Grenadier.076104.Response To FOIA Request, 12-11-19

August 12,2009
Janice Wolk Grenadier

15 W. Spring Street
Alexandria,VA 22301
Re: In the Matter of Ilona Ely (Freedman) Grenadier

VSB Docket #09-NAT-076104
Dear Ms. Grenadier:
Please note that I am a member of the Committee on Lawyer Discipline (COLD) and the
current chair of the COLD Oversight Subcommittee. Your Complaint and your many letters and faxes
to the Virginia State Bar Office of Bar Counsel have been forwarded to me for a response.
Please note from the outset that COLD has policy-making and oversight responsibilities.
However,COLD is not an adjudicatory body. COLD's oversight responsibility is limited to ensuring
that the proper procedures were followed in theses matters. COLD is not permitted to substitute its
judgment for others in the disciplinary system. Instead,COLD simply ensures that the proper
procedures were followed,regardless of the outcome.
In conducting a review of this matter,I have read the Complaint which you filed on July 30,
2008 with attached documentation. I have read the response letter from James C. Bodie,Virginia State
Bar (VSB) Intake Counsel dated August 4,2008 advising you that the Bar could take no action based
upon the allegations and circumstances surrounding your Complaint. In addition,I reviewed your letter
of October 22,2008 to Mr. Bodie requesting reconsideration of the matter.
Subsequently,on November 25,2008 Jane A. Fletcher,VSB Deputy Intake Counsel,wrote you

advising she had reviewed your Complaint as well and agreed with Mr. Bodie that no issues warranting
further investigation or disciplinary action had been presented. On December 30,2008 you forwarded
a letter to Ms. Fletcher indicating your disagreement.
On January 28,2009 you forwarded a letter to Manuel A. Capsalis,the then current VSB
President requesting his intervention.
Apparently on April 29,2009 the Complaint with documentation was again filed with the VSB.
You then subsequently faxed a letter dated June 11,2009 with attached documentation to Edward L.
Davis,VSB Bar Counsel. Mr. Davis forwarded a letter to you dated June 23, 2009 setting forth in
Janice Wolk Grenadier August 12, 2009
Page 2
great detail his review of the facts and circumstances of the history of the litigation and dispute you
have with Ilona Ely (Freedman) Grenadier. I will not repeat Mr. Davis' detailed summary in this letter.
I also reviewed your letter of June 24, 2009 taking exception to his findings,Mr. Davis's letter to you
of June 25,2009, your fax to Mr. Davis of June 26,2009, and your faxes of July 2, 2009 and July 14,
2009.
In summary,your Complaint has been reviewed by three (3) separate attorneys with the
Virginia State Bar including James C. Bodie,Intake Counselor,Jane A. Fletcher, Deputy Intake
Counselor and by Bar Counsel Edward L. Davis. All three (3) attorneys have reached the same
conclusion that based upon the facts and circumstances which you have alleged that this is not a matter
for investigation by the Virginia State Bar. All three (3) have advised you that your recourse,if there is
any,should be through the courts and you should pursue same through private counsel.
Based upon my review of all the matters contained in the Virginia State Bar file,it appears that
all proper procedures were followed concerning the Complaint you filed against Ilona Ely (Freedman)
Grenadier. I understand that you do not agree with the determination by the Office of Bar Counsel to
not conduct any further investigation. However,as I mentioned above,I cannot substitute my
judgment for others in the disciplinary system. My role is merely to ensure that the proper procedures
within the Virginia State Bar Disciplinary System have been followed in considering your Complaint.
My review indicates that all proper procedures were followed.
Accordingly,please note that no further reviews will be conducted.
Very truly yours,
Stephen H. Ratliff
SHR/bll
cc: Kimberly Slayton-White, Esq., COLD Chair
John D. Whittington,Esq.,COLD Vice Chair
Edward L. Davis, Esq., Bar Counsel
Jon D. Huddleston,Esq.,President,Virginia State Bar
Inquiry Form
V I R G I N I A S TA T E B A R
VIRGINIA STATE BAR NOTE: Send in this form if you have concerns about a lawyer's conduct. Your inquiry might result in
INTAKE OFFICE discipline to the lawyer. If you are seeking other remedies against the lawyer, you may need to seek
707 East Main St., Suite 1500 legal advice from a lawyer in private practice. Also, the bar may require your further involvement in
Richmond, VA 23219-2800 an investigation of your complaint by asking you to be interviewed by a bar investigator and/or to
Telephone: (804) 775-0570 participate at a hearing.
_ Mr. _ Mrs. _ Miss _

x Ms.
YOUR
NAME: janice wolk grenadier
first initial last
15 W Spring St. Daytime Telephone No.:

YOUR
street home (70 3) 623-9655
ADDRESS:
work
Other Telephone No. and times you
Alexandria VA 22301 can be reached:
city state zip code
jwolkgrenadier@aol.com
email
LAWYER’S Ilona Ely Freedman Grenadier Heckman

first initial last
NAME:
LAWYER’S Grenadier, Anderson, Starace & Duffe Lawyer’s Telephone No.:

lawyer’s law firm, if known
ADDRESS: (70 3) 683-9000
street address or P.O. Box
Alexandria VA 22314
city state zip code
List the names, addresses, and phone numbers of persons who might be able to give additional information
about your inquiry:
YOUR
SIGNATURE: Janice Wolk Grenadier DATE: 5/22/2010
FORM MUST BE SIGNED AND DATED

Turn this form over for more information we need from you to analyze your inquiry. ☛
Virginia State Bar Inquiry Form . . . Page 2
PLEASE ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS:
1. Have you or a member of your family contacted us about this lawyer before? ❑
x yes ❑ no
If yes, please state when you made the inquiry and the outcome of that inquiry.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E6meWwoItlU
2. Have you filed a complaint or legal action about this matter anywhere else? ❑
x yes ❑ no
If yes, state where and the outcome.
3. Did you hire this lawyer? ❑ yes ❑

x no
If yes, give the approximate date you employed him/her, the nature of your legal case, and estimate how much money, if any, you paid him/her.
4. If you did not hire the lawyer, what is your connection with the lawyer?
5. Is your concern only that you think the lawyer charged you too much? ❑ yes ❑
x no
If yes, you should contact the Virginia State Bar at (804) 775-0500 and ask for information on fee dispute resolution.
LAWYER’S ACTIONS COMPLAINED OF:
Mr. Davis, After our last phone call and how ya'll were going to ignore
my complaints.. i have decided to go to the public and see how many
other peoples lives you have screwed with.

Inquiry Form

x Ms.
YOUR
NAME: Janice Wolk Grenadier
first initial last
15 West Spring Street Daytime Telephone No.:

YOUR
street home (70 3) 623-9655
ADDRESS:
work (20 2) 215-0525
city state zip code
email

first initial last
NAME:
LAWYER’S Grenadier Anderson, Starace & Duffet Lawyer’s Telephone No.:

ADDRESS: (70 3) 683-9000
649 Sth Washington Street
Alexandria VA 22314
city state zip code
about your inquiry:
Amy Bird, (540) 635-5390
Andrea Grenadier, (703) 624-4557
Scotty , (571) 438-5627
Karen Grenadier,
YOUR

x yes ❑ no
In 2008/2009/2010 - would like to believe Edward Davis - VSB wants to
do the Right thing - investigate the Truth.
x yes ❑ no
Appeal Supreme Court for Bellefonte. NO legal action filed for Note
Ilona Grenadier is with holding from me.

x no
She represented and manipulated me into believing she was working for
the best interest of me and my family. Instead she was only working in
the best interest of herself and her law firm. Mismanaging the Sonia
Ilona -late wife Albert stepmther David - mismanage Sonia Grenadier
Trust (mther to Albert)
x no
Ilona Grenadier representing herself was disingenuous in court in
September of 2007, She filed false and disingenuous statements knowingly
with the Circuit Court of Alexandria. She is with holding a Note that
Ilona insisted on for a loan of a commission which she negotiated a
settlement for the mismanagement of the Sonia Grenadier Trust out her law
firm. I have requested the Note on several occasions to be returned and
she has refused. Ilona Grenadier knowing that she and her law firm had
mismanaged these funds manipulated me into believing differently. Ilona
Grenadier using her power and knowledge of the situation was disingenuous
with everyone involved with the mismanagement of the Sonia Grenadier
Trust. Ilona Grenadier had manipulated everyone into believing what she
wanted. In the summer of 2008 Ilona Grenadier turned to Janice Wolk
Grenadier and informed her she should be grateful to Ilona Grenadier for
the Listing of Real Estate known as Holland Road - and that David
Grenadier didn't steal the money from the Sonia Grenadier Trust which only
left Ilona Grenadier and her law firm to do it. Ilona Grenadier knew from
an accounting I had done that at least $54,000 - $ 60,000. had been
mismanaged from the Sonia Grenadier Trust yet she negotiated only $40,000.
taken -
The money from the Sonia Grenadier Trust went to Benefit Ilona Grenadier
personally benefited with the Real Estate she purchased through GIC.
Complaints on the lawyers in her law firm which have chosen to turn the
other cheek and other attorney's who know about this complaint - will have
VSB Complaints filled against them. Ilona Grenadier was also manipulative
and controlled the Late Judge Albert Grenadier's sister Ruth and was
disingenuous with her. Ruth Grenadier passed on May 17, 2008. Prior to
her passing in the Spring 0f 2007 Amy Bird - Ruth's daughter was in
Ilona's office where Ruth was requesting her will to be changed. Ilona
Grenadier and Ruth own an inherited property. Ilona informed Ruth and Amy
LAWYER’S ACTIONS COMPLAINED OF (continued)
she would not change Ruth's will till her divorce to her husband was
complete. Ruth died with a will she didn't want because Ilona Grenadier
wanted to manipulate the order and the way Ruth wanted things. Ilona
Grenadier charged Ruth for her time so she had a fiduciary responsibility
to Ruth. Ruth at the time she met with Ilona had had several stokes. Ruth
never lived to learn the truth about the mismanagement of her mother's
Trust.
Janice Wolk Grenadier believes Ilona Grenadier has broken the following
rules of the VSB:
Rules -
1.1/
1.2/
1.6/
1.7/
1.8/
1.9/
1.10/
1.11/
1.14/
1.15/
1.16/
2.1/
3.4/
Virginia Code Responsibilities:
DR 1 -102 / 103
DR 3-104
DR 5 - 101 / 104/105
DR 7 - 104 / 105/109/
DR 9 - 101 / 102 / 103
Everything can be backed up in writing with documents from arms length
documents. Some notes are notes from our conversations that I took and
details in day timers that I keep.

Inquiry Form

x Ms.
YOUR
first initial last

YOUR
street home (70 3) 623-9655
ADDRESS:
work (20 2) 215-0525
city state zip code
email
LAWYER’S Charles A Anderson

first initial last
NAME:

ADDRESS: (70 3) 683-9000
Alexandria VA 22314
city state zip code
about your inquiry:
Ilona Grenadier Heckman, (703) 683-9000
Arlene Starace, (703) 683-9000
Benton S Duffett , (703) 683-9000
Elaine M Vadas, (703) 683-9000
YOUR

1. Have you or a member of your family contacted us about this lawyer before? ❑ yes ❑
x no
2. Have you filed a complaint or legal action about this matter anywhere else? ❑ yes ❑
x no

x no
Partner @ Grenadier Anderson Starace & Duffett PC
x no
Charles A. Anderson is aware of Ilona Grenadier's infractions - being
disingenuous in court - filing false documents - with holding my Note by
his law firm. The Mismanagement of the law firm with the Sonia Grenadier
Trust. I have sent all the attorney's in Ilona Grenadier's office the
information and they have ignored it.
rule 1.6
Dr 1-103
Inquiry Form

x Ms.
YOUR
first initial last

YOUR
street home (70 3) 623-9655
ADDRESS:
work (20 2) 215-0525
city state zip code
email
LAWYER’S Benton S Duffett lll

first initial last
NAME:

ADDRESS: (70 3) 683-9000
Alexandria VA 22314
city state zip code
about your inquiry:
Charles A Anderson, (703) 683-9000
Arlene Starace, (703) 683-9000
John T Winkler, (703) 683-9000
YOUR

x no
x no

x no
Partner at Grenadier Anderson Starace & Duffett PC
x no
Ben is a Partner at Grenadier, Anderson, Starace & Duffett PC - employed
by the law firm at the time the funds from the Sonia Grenadier Trust were
being mismanaged. has ignored my requests for my Note that is being with
held by the Grenadier, Anderson, Starace & Duffett PC -
Rule 1.6
DR 1-103
Inquiry Form

x Ms.
YOUR
first initial last

YOUR
street home (70 3) 623-9655
ADDRESS:
work (20 2) 215-0525
city state zip code
email
LAWYER’S Arlene T Starace

first initial last
NAME:

ADDRESS: (70 3) 683-9000
Alexandria VA 22314
city state zip code
about your inquiry:
Charles A Anderson, (703) 683-9000
Benton S Duffett, (703) 683-9000
John T Winkler, (703) 683-9000
YOUR

x no
x no

x no
She is a partner at Grenadier, Anderson, Starace & Duffett PC
x no
Arlene Starace through e-mails from Janice Wolk Grenadier is aware of the
Note she is due being held by Grenadier Starace & Duffett PC - She is
aware of the mismanagement of the Sonia Grenadier Trust by the law firm
and Ilona Grenadier Parther to Grenadier Starace & Duffett PC
DR 1 - 103
Rule 1.6
Inquiry Form
Mail to:
NOTE: Send in this form if you have concerns about a lawyer’s conduct. Your inquiry might result in
VIRGINIA STATE BAR
INTAKE OFFICE discipline to the lawyer. If you are seeking other remedies against the lawyer, you may need to seek legal
707 East Main St., Suite 1500 advice from a lawyer in private practice. Also, the bar may require your further involvement in an investi-
Richmond, VA 23219-2800 gation by asking you to be interviewed by a bar investigator and/or to participate at a hearing.
Telephone: (804) 775-0570

x Ms.
YOUR
first initial last

YOUR street
ADDRESS: ❑
x home ( 703) 836-9655
❑
x work ( 703) 836-9655
Alexandria VA 22301 Other Telephone No. and times you

city state zip code can be reached:
❑
x ( 202 ) 368-7178 7038369655
e-mail ❑
x ( 202 ) 368-7178 7038369655

first initial last
NAME:
LAWYER’S Grenadier, Anderson, Starace, Duffet

lawyer’s law firm, if known Lawyer’s Telephone No.:
ADDRESS: ( 703) 683-9000
649 South Washington Street
Alexandria VA 22301
city state zip code
This is not a complaint to change the outcome of a case. This is a
serious violation of the Virginia State Bar Ethics and laws in the State
of Virginia. This is a lawyer you choose to turn the other way on who was
involved in the Forgery of an Addendum to the Trust of Sonia Grenadier,
who stole a human from his grave site at King David and knowingly
(Continue on the back or a separate page if you need more space. Also, attach copies of any documents that help explain
your inquiry.)
YOUR
illegally donated his garden at King David, This is a lawyer that she and
her law firm stole over $95,000 from an elderly women, This is a lawyer
who the Judge's have exparte communications with, that use's bribery - you
have all looked the other way. It has now come to my attention and she
about your inquiry:
Ben DiMuro, 1101 King Street Suite 600, (703) 683-4333
John Tran, 1101 King Street Suite 600, (703) 683-4333
Michael Weiser, 510 King Street Suite 416, (703) 836-7003
Neil Gurvitch, 4416 East West Highway, (301) 684-3100
x yes ❑ no
on or around September of 2008, ignored Ben DiMuro past president, donated 10%
of his estate to the VSB
x yes ❑ no
COA -all orders are VOID due to lack of Jurisdiction by Judges,Due Process,
Fraud et al
3. Describe your relationship to the lawyer who is the subject of your Inquiry by choosing from the following:
❑ I am the lawyer’s client
❑x I am the lawyer’s former client
❑ I am a relative or friend of the lawyer’s client
❑ I am an opposing party
❑ I am an opposing lawyer
❑ Other
If Other, please explain:
4. What is the nature of your legal case? When was the lawyer employed or appointed to represent you? How much money, if any, was the
lawyer paid to represent you?
$ she owes me.willful acts were malicious,
violent,oppressive,fraudulent,wanton,or reckless
x no
If yes, you should contact the bar at (804) 775-9423 for information on fee dispute resolution.
6. Have you read the pamphlet describing the bar’s attorney disciplinary process? ❑
x yes ❑ no
and her lawyers were notified that as the x-wife of David Grenadier - The
properties he sold while married to me - needed my signature on the deeds.
The Deeds as it has been explained to me have defects. Ilona and her
lawyers have been notified of this. Ilona's Liquidation of the
Partnership GIC was done by the looks of it in Maryland with a Lawyer not
licensed in Virginia, From his website. The documents can be found on my
scribd account http://www.scribd.com/VirginiaLaw
http://judicialslavery.com/ http://valaw2010.blogspot.com/
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=ttFLhGwu0Xo This
is not my first complaint about this Law Firm. You have continued to
ignore all complaints - This now affects the homes of 15+ people whom
think they were given clear title to their homes. Ilona used an attorney
that was Maryland attorney who most likely was unaware of the fact that
David was married. This agreement did not hold up in Virginia with
Virginia Lawyers on the sale of the property 28 E. Bellefonte Ave. So
this agreement should not hold up on any other properties that she has
Sold or moved from one name to another to protect herself from the FRAUD
of the agreement. the attorney's are the attorneys that are involved in
all her FRAUDS and use there influence with the VSB & Judges.
Inquiry Form
Mail to:
NOTE: Send in this form if you have concerns about a lawyer’s conduct. Your inquiry might result in
VIRGINIA STATE BAR
INTAKE OFFICE discipline to the lawyer. If you are seeking other remedies against the lawyer, you may need to seek legal
707 East Main St., Suite 1500 advice from a lawyer in private practice. Also, the bar may require your further involvement in an investi-
Richmond, VA 23219-2800 gation by asking you to be interviewed by a bar investigator and/or to participate at a hearing.
Telephone: (804) 775-0570

x Ms.
YOUR
first initial last

YOUR street
ADDRESS: ❑
x home ( 202) 368-7178
❑
x work ( 703) 836-9655
Alexandria VA 22301 Other Telephone No. and times you

city state zip code can be reached:
❑ ( )
e-mail ❑ ( )
LAWYER’S Neil Gurvitch

first initial last
NAME:
LAWYER’S Selzer Gurvitch

lawyer’s law firm, if known Lawyer’s Telephone No.:
ADDRESS: ( 301) 634-3100
4416 East West Highway
Bethesda MD 20814
city state zip code
This is not a request to change an outcome. This is to have the charges
of this attorney and the attorney he did business with in Virginia while
not licensed in Virginia to be held accountable for his actions, along
with the Actions of the Attorney he worked with Ilona Ely Freedman
Grenadier Heckmnan of Grenadier Anderson, Strace, Duffett & Kiesler of the

(Continue on the back or a separate page if you need more space. Also, attach copies of any documents that help explain
your inquiry.)
YOUR
City of Alexandria Virginia. Mr. Gurvitch wrote a Liquidation Agreement
for Grenadier Investment - He is not licensed in Virginia and has admitted
to working for Ilona only - who is licensed and should know the law. The
following is an outline - GIC – Deeds - What Ilona has done to everyone
about your inquiry:
Ilona Grenadier, 649 South Washington Street , (703) 683-9000
David Grenadeir, 649 South Washington Street, (703) 683-9000
x no
x yes ❑ no
VSB complaint against Ilona Grenadier
3. Describe your relationship to the lawyer who is the subject of your Inquiry by choosing from the following:
❑ I am the lawyer’s client
❑ I am the lawyer’s former client
❑ I am a relative or friend of the lawyer’s client
❑ I am an opposing party
❑ I am an opposing lawyer
❑x Other
If Other, please explain: the Liquidation agreement should have included my name
4. What is the nature of your legal case? When was the lawyer employed or appointed to represent you? How much money, if any, was the
lawyer paid to represent you?
We are talking 4 Mil + owed to me
x no
If yes, you should contact the bar at (804) 775-9423 for information on fee dispute resolution.
6. Have you read the pamphlet describing the bar’s attorney disciplinary process? ❑
x yes ❑ no
here was calculating and deliberate – Thinking she was above the law GIC –
Partnership Agreement Signed between David & Ilona on (IEG 51% & DMG 49%)
- July 29th, 1985
http://www.scribd.com/doc/136021379/IEG-DMG-GIC-Liquidation-Agreement-Nov-1
7-1997 404 E. Monroe Ave – Loan with Virginia Commerce -
http://www.scribd.com/doc/136660567/IEG-404-E-Monroe-Ave-Va-Commerce-Loan-E
TC 404 E. Monroe Ave – Tax Record 2008
http://www.scribd.com/doc/136496703/IEG-404-E-Monroe-Ave-Tax-Record-Sept-18
-2008 GIC – Misc Tax Records 2008 -
http://www.scribd.com/doc/136496439/IEG-GIC-Misc-Tax-Records-COA-Properties
-Sept-2008 GIC – List of Properties and Information -
http://www.scribd.com/doc/136469666/IEG-GIC-List-of-Properties-April-11-201
3 IEG – Other Tax Records of Real Estate owned by Ilona et al -
http://www.scribd.com/doc/136495781/IEG-Other-Real-Estate-Tax-Records-Septe
mber-2008 Southway Terrace – Loan with Citibank -
http://www.scribd.com/doc/136660419/IEG-Southway-Terrace-Citibank-Note
Southway Terrace Notes & Tax Records –
http://www.scribd.com/doc/136495167/IEG-Southway-Terrace-Notes-Tax-Records-
September-2008 Southway Terrace Hud Ones -
http://www.scribd.com/doc/136469159/IEG-GIC-Hud-Ones-Sthway-List-of-GIC-Apr
il-11-2013 December 1986 - Janice loans DMG $3,600.00 for purchase of 28
E. Bellefonte Ave September 1988 – Janice & David Get married October 1989
– Townhouse Sq / Southway Terrace purchased value today about 12 million
September 1991 - Assignment of $30,000.00 commission which Ilona acting
as JWG attorney maliciously manipulated out of JWG with lies and
misrepresentation. She had been involved with the Forgery of Sonia
Grenadier’s name on an addendum to give her and her law firm access to
Sonia’s money & property – which the law firm then stole over $ 95,000.
+ October 1992 – Refi of Bellefonte Ave - approx. $60,000. Goes into GIC
– GIC is loaned $ 30,000. Through lying in Bankruptcy Court – as well as
the Circuit Court of Alexandria – Ilona Grenadier is able to steal this
money for herself - Janice Wolk Grenadier wife to David Grenadier now
has an interest and approx. without interest $ 63,000. And other payments
made into 28 E. Bellefonte In GIC and its properties. November 17, 1997
David & Ilona Grenadier do a Liquidation Agreement without David’s wife’s
(JWG) signature. The only attorney that is mentioned is a Maryland
attorney. The Liquidation Agreement can be read at -
http://www.scribd.com/doc/136021379/IEG-DMG-GIC-Liquidation-Agreement-Nov-1
7-1997 April 16, 2013 - Conversation with Neil Gurvitch he - has never
met my x-husband – DMG nor has he ever worked for him – Ilona is his
client – Which the question then is Why would Ilona take the agreement to
a Maryland lawyer with all the lawyers she has here in Virginia? April 16,
2013 – Deborah at the Virginia State Bar confirms Neil Gurvitch has never
been a member of the Virginia State Bar giving him legal rights to act as
an attorney on any Virginia matter Janice Wolk Grenadier has never given
Ilona or David Trustee powers for her ownership in the GIC properties by
her contribution of money and marriage. When Bellefonte Ave was sold –
The Liquidation Agreement did not hold up by Virginia Law Standards – so
it would not for any of the other properties owned by GIC from the
marriage of Janice & David without Janice signature. The following
properties have been “Sold” or Ilona realizing the errors moved the
Properties in and out of different Partnership names – The owners of the
following properties have been notified – Caroline G or Jonathan M
Perkins 1623 Francis Hammond Pkwy Alexandria, Virginia 22302 Steven M.
Kremer 44 E Taylor Run Pkwy Alexandria, Virginia 22304 William Dale
Betz 1943 Euclid Ave, - Lincoln, Ne 68502 54 E Taylor Run Pkwy -
Alexandria, Virginia 22304 Mary Gilreath 33 S Gordon St Alexandria,
Virginia 22304 Gregory P Lynskey 2943 Sycamore St Alexandria, Virginia

22305 Ms. Anita Workman 2945 Sycamore St. Alexandria, Virginia 22305
Robert L or Eunice Thompson 415 East Del Ray Ave Alexandria, Virginia
22301 Ms. Sharon G. Scribner 224 Guthrie Ave Alexandr

15 W. Spring Street
Alexandria, VA 22301
202-368-7178
JWGvBias@qmail.com
December 1, 2016
Virginia State Bar

1111 East Main Street Suite 700
Richmond Virginia 23219
I- 1 :Í:; Í IVE 0
(804) 775-0570 F----- 1
1
JIRC Judicial Inquiry and Review Commission (JIRC) E DEC 2 2016
j~
~ ~ ~' ~
l-
Dear Sirs, I *M /5./\ C-r/\TE D/"D D M, 1
This Complaint comes after several complaints ignored by both the JIRC and the VSB. That the
Judiciary being of a self-reporting it is important that the highest of integrity is displayed. Instead I have
been illegally jailed et al to try and break me by lawyers and judges, while the state of Virginia has stood
back and laughed.
I am not alone, many have committed suicide and Murder for Hire is the norm by the Old Boys Network,
which by all appearance owns the VSB and the JIRC.
The Criminal Spree of Divorce Lawyer Ilona as attached documents show started in November of 1983
with the Forgery of Sonia Grenadier's signature giving her through her law firm the ability to steal
Millions in Real Estate and funds.
That the lies and manipulation and theft of Real Estate and money from Janice Wolk Grenadier would
begin on or around February 14, 2016 that the attached Criminal Complaints go against the following
Judges and Lawyers. It is understood that this is unusual complaining and delivering the complaints to
both the JIRC and the VSB at the same time, but, the depth of the corruption and collusion overlaps
both to the extend both need to have the information.
That the Criminal Actions of Divorce Lawyer Ilona Grenadier Heckman with the help of David
Grenadier
and her daughter Erika Grenadier Lewis are in the Millions.
That Ilona an experienced Divorce Lawyer would represent and use her legal knowledge to
steal, use
lawyers not licensed in Virginia, the conversion of property, Bank Fraud et al - the attached
Criminal
Complaints Exhibits 1-2 and 390 into that. The other Exhibits give you the needed
evidence to show
the collusion and corruption.
I (Janice) am aware this will not change the outcome of my cases and the
continuance of legal actions.
But, the reality of nowhere to go for help or to have these criminals Judge
and Lawyers actions reviewed
means they continue to do this to others on a regular basis. These lawyers
must be stopped.
That through interviews et al I will be able to give you other victims of

these lawyers - Judges.
1
FBI:
John Comey
FederaIJudges:
USDC of DC Federal Judge James E Boasberg
USDC of DC Federal Judge Beryl A. Howell
USDC of DC Federal Judge Reggie Walton
USDC of DC Federal Judge Richard. Leon
USDC of VA Federal Judge Gerald Lee
USDC of DC Judge Rudolph Contreras
USDC of VA Leonie M Brinkema
Federal Appeals Judges

Circuit Judges: Judge Judith W. Rogers
Judge Sri Srinivasan
Senior Circuit Judge Douglas H . Ginsburg
Judge Wilinson
Judge Niemeyer
Senior Ciruit Judge Clyde Hamilton
Federal Judicial Council of the District of Columbia Circuit:

Chief Circuit Judge Merrick B. Garland,
Chief Circuit Judge Brett M. Kavanaugh,
Judge Sri Srinivasan,
Judge Patricia A. Millett
Judge Cornelia T. L. Pillard,
Circuit Judges:
Chief District Judge Richard W. Roberts
Judge Amy Berman Jackson,
Judge Rudolph Contreras,
Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson
Supreme Court of Virginia Justices:

Chief Justice Leroy Rountree Hassell Sr.
Chief Judge Supreme Court Justice Cynthia Kinser
Justices - The Honorable Donald W. Lemons -
The Honorable S. Bernard Goodwyn -
The Honorable LeRoy F. Millette, Jr. -
The Honorable William C. Mims -
The Honorable Elizabeth A. McCIanahan
The Honorable Cleo E. Powell

Senior Justices -
The Honorable Charles S. Russel -
The Honorable Elizabeth B. Lacy -
The Honorable Lawrence L. Koontz, Jr.
Appeals Court of Virginia Justices:

2
Chief Judge : The Honorable Glen A . Huff
The Honorable Robert J. Humphreys-
The Honorable D. Arthur Kelsey
The Honorable William G. Petty
The Honorable Randolph A. Beales
The Honorable Rossie D. Alston, Jr. -
The Honorable Stephen R. McCullough
The Honorable Teresa M. Chafin
The Honorable Marla Graff Decker
Senior Judges : The Honorable Sam W . Coleman Ill
The Honorable Rosemarie Annunziata
The Honorable Rudolph Bumgardner, Ill
The Honorable Jean Harrison Clements
The Honorable James W. Haley,
Circuit Court Judges of the State of Virginia:

Chief Judge Donald Haddock
, Chief Judge Lisa Kemler
Judge Nolan Dawkins
Judge James Clark
Judge Thomas Fortkort - Attorneys Arbitration and Mediation, Inc
Judge J. Howe Brown
Judge James J. McGrath - Judicial Solutions
Judge Richard Bowen Potter (PWC)
Chief Judge Mary Grace O'Brien (PWC)
Judge Carroll A. Weimer Jr. (PWC)
Judge Richard J McCue (Arlington)
Judge Donald Kent - McCammon Group
Judge Poston
Judge Johnston PWC
City of Alexandria Magistrate: George F Ball
Judicial Inquiry and Review Commission (JIRC)
Donald Curry
Katherine Baldwin Burnett
Virginia State Bar

Edward Davis
James Michael McCauley
Lawyers:
Ilona Grenadier - Grenadier. Anderson, Starace, Duffett & Kieser
Heather Jenquine - Grenadier Law et al
Ben DÌMuro - DiMuroGinsberg
Hillary J. Collyer - DÍMuro Ginsberg / Lasher et al
Judge John Tran - DÌMuro Ginsberg / Fairfax Cty
Andrea Molsley - DÌMruoGinsberg
3
Michael Weiser Esq
Ann Schmidt - Reed Smith /
Reed Smith -
Rich Rosenthal Brincfield Manitta Dzubin & Kroger LLP Lana Manitta
KellerHeckman
Fagelson Law Firm
Troutman Sanders (aka Mays and Valentine)
Neil Gurvitch Wecheler, Selzer & Guritch, Chartered
Kermit Rosenberg
Robert Mayer
Roy Zimmerman
Stonewall Title
Heba Carter
City of Alexandria Attorneys
Megan Roberts
George McAndrews
James L. Banks Jr.
Ms. Gerry
Ms. Christia Brown
State of Virginia Asst to Gov Terry Mcauliffe - Brian Moran

Randy Sengel (Ret) - Elected Commonwealth Attorney City of Alexandria
Bryan Porter - Elected Commonwealth Attorney City of Alexandria
Clerks of Court:
Angela D. Caesar, - United States Federal Clerk of Court
Patricia L. Harrington - Clerk of Court - Supreme Court of Virginia
Ed Semonian - Elected Clerk of Court / Elected official of the City of Alexandria
Patricia S. Connor the 4th Circuit of the USDC of VA appeals
That it is believed all of the above have law license. I reserve the right to amend.
That the Virginia State Bar Michael McCaulley, Broudy, Edward Davis have acted in a
unprofessional and in direct conflict of the Professional Code of Ethics by not investigat
ing the
Criminal Actions of Divorce Lawyer Ilona Ely Grenadier Heckman and her lawyers / lawyers
in her law
firm that have all had the knowledge of her criminal acts. The appearance is they ignored
the acts
and actions for friends.
That Divorce Lawyer Ilona's Crime spree started the documentation show started
on or around the
purchase of Custis Ave out of the Sonia Grenadier Trust and then has continue
d through today with
several unanswered question with the King David
That Divorce Lawyer Ilona Grenadier Heckman the widow to Judge

Albert Grenadier of the City of
Alexandria and his 1 St cousin Jerome "Jerry" Heckman founding partner
to Keller Heckman an
International Law Firm.
4
The Cover-up of Ilona's Crime Spree includes the following:
Exhibit 1 Criminal Complaint on many
Exhibit 2 Criminal Complaint on Judge James Clark
Exhibit 3 Criminal complaint on Divorce Lawyer Ilona Grenadier Heckman
Exhibit 4 Outline of those Murdered, Suicide and Linkes to other evidence
Exhibit 5 Documents that show the thefts and back up the Claims in the Complaints :
Exhibit 6 Documents that further show the "TRUTH"
That you have been contacted prior to this on these complaints
Legal action has been filed but, you cannot get Justice in a corrupt court.
Janice Wolk Grenadier's relations to Divorce Lawyer Ilona Grenadier Heckman are: was a client, was
a former client, a relative as married to David Mark Grenadier, is a Victim of her criminal activity. Is
owed by law, by right over $20 Million in Real Estate and money - loans.
It started out as a Divorce case and Bankruptcy case due to her thefts and lies.
I have read the pamphlet on the disciplinary process.
That I believe everything in this letter, the attachments to be true to the best of my knowledge
. I have
been denied all discovery in Divorce, Bankruptcy et al
Respectfu Submitted,
Janlci~Volk Grenadier
5
Í)¿ Akk Z
..........i...................................i
AO 91 (Rcv. l l/11) Crintìi,ul Cumpluìi,t
UNITED STATES DISTRICT CO

URT
fur thc
E.astcm Divt·ict of Virginia
United States ofkmcrica

0 )
V. )
Judge Brian Kenny, Trustee Thom
as Gorman, DOJ Joseph Casc No.
Guzinski, Judge James Clark, Divorce )
Lawyer Ilona Grenadier )
Hcckmån, Lawyer Hcba Carter, Lawy
er Reza Moshin, Scott
Suroveil, Judge Donald Haddock,
Judge Carroll A. Weìmer,
Judge Poston, Judge Lemons, Judg
e John Tran, Lawyers:
**t U * M#lfv +Uol-4{ 1~Ül® 4*Qko»
Hillary Colyer, Andrea Mostoy, BW
W Law Group , Ben jv¿ól.* *Lujtdb¿-,
DiMuro, Rced Smith with the right to add 08:ers*¿Ztu/ *ol<k ¿d ; Ík//?*074),
LR¥ /IU<kä.el Ù.)1·Wc«
Defendants CRIMIÑAL COMPLAINT ~~~-~~;~
I, the complainant iii this case, statc
that the following is true to the
best of my knowledge ond belief.
On or about tho datc(s) of
_ __ in ilìc county o f
_ City of Alexandria
M lhe
Eastern District o!' \Arginia , ihe defcndant(s) violated:
Code Section
0112„se Description
The Code and Sections are atta

ched in more detail this includes
Communications, Obstruction Fraud on the CouM , Ex-parte
of Justice Violating Janice Wol
k Grenadiers: Bill of Rights,
Laws and Codes of the Suprem
e Court of the United State O f
America,
United States Constitution Righ
ts - VA Constitution Right -
Judicial Canon's Violated by
Professional Code of Conduc t Rules Violated
Judges -
This criminal complaint is base

d on thcsc facts:
Taped court hearings, telephone
conversation's done in Virginia
court that are riddled with lies a one sided permission, e-mails,
by lawyers empowcrcd by documents filed in the
Judges - which creates obst
False imprisonment of Janice ruction of Justice, Fraud on
Wolk Grenadier - A Gang the Court,
like mentality to mentally , phys
Exparte communications and ically harm Janice and her girls
financial donations as THANK .
Virl,Ae YOU , This is without any disco
very allowed . - See Lmks to
4 Continued on the attt,chcd shcct.
CU,1'Vhli,l,m/ '.ï 'Çtjylanu.c
Janice Wolk Grenadier / VICTIM

Pt·íilled iíui,ie (t"~1 t¿'Ic
Sworn to before mc and
xìgned in my presence.
Date:
J,/tlxi''s siwintwrc
City and state:
Í'i·i,1 Ì ,·~Í Il,1,;1*. „ :KÍ IÍI k

The Links to back up Claims:
JWG Links -Video Update October 28, 2016
June 22, 2016 Janice Circuit Court of the City of Alexandria VA - exposing the corruption - Judge
James
' Clark states he and Carter Land were Trustee's on all of Burke and Herbert Loans for Friendship
as he did
on June 8, 2016. That Judge Clark further stated no financial compensation from Burke and Herbert band
directly or indirectly. Which must mean the lawyer representing Burke & Herbert from his law firm would
have had to do it for free - "friendship" still illegal. Janice states this is a "Shame Hearing" - Judge Clark
States - "Not on this side" since when does Judge's take sides?
https:üyoutu.be/L05U4Frvdwl
In May of 2016 learned that Judge Clark had a financial relationship - I contacted the FBI and here
is the
conversation with the FBI that has ignored it:
https:üyoutu.be/DbdcVaZkltQ
These two videos show that l spoke with Gov. Terry McAuliffe
and Brian Moran and showed him my Box
of evidence that
https:Hyoutu.be/kQlhRnaxvRc
https://youtu.be/JevLIGOtQBE
Janice Exposes the Corruption of the City of Alexandria

Nazi Virginia the place Terrorist's can Buy $$$$ Justice
https://youtube.com/watch?v=qhBZLmVynXc
Janice Wolk Grenadier asking / exposing Mark Warner

for the 3rd time having the discussion
he lied.
DSCF0005- Jailed so Senator Mark Warner could be Re-elec

ted and
https://youtu.be/rRs7cBEYAJQ
DSCF0039 Mark Warner Exoosedashe Lies about what he knows
- YouTube
https://youtu.be/OlOopcNIqNA
These Videos are the tapes of Janice Wolk Grenad

ier Standing UP and speaking out at the City of
Alexandria Council Meeting
June 2016 COA Council Meeting

COA june 18, 2016 Council Meeting exposing Judge
James Clark
https://youtu.be/MXa5aVqLPPI
June 2016 Burke & Herbert Bank - Lying

to me aboutthe subpoena and that he had no idea
I wasto come
today after I had already had a conversation with
another person there.
https://youtu.be/glsnNjOgvko
October 2016 City Council Meeting

further exposing the corruption in the City of
Alexandria
https://youtu.be/vNKZD4a 6Fw
2
October 2016 - City of Alexandria Council Meeting - These two tapes
show the Financial Questionable activity
https://youtu.be/GaNIBTEzWLM
and
The disclosure of the City Corruption in the finances - Private School $70,000 - for
tennis courts - COA funded
$400,000 for tennis courts - the City Paid $1.6 Million
September 2016 City Council Meeting https://youtu.be/lrSIZ/oTh7A
Right with Crime - CSPAN - Talking about the Corruption with

Judges https://youtu.be/IYM6ULrTfMO
CATO - Judge Merrlck Garland https ://youtu . be/ IVIUoBWrZvQ
February 2016 - The $ 602,000 SCAM of the JIRC https ://youtu . be/ poQ6uH hSLXM
DSCF0008 - The Mortgage Crisis - Eric Holder Eric Holder and the SCAM on the American People
https://youtu.be/GjaZ6a--aRM
DSCF0042 Citv of Alexandria Council Meetinq Januar

y 2016 - YouTube
https://youtu.be/IZG00480vlo
DSCF0047 City of Alexandria City Council Meeting Decem

ber 2015 - YouTube
https://youtu.be/yd9qz2ukExE
DSCF0048 Citv of Alexandria Council Meetinq Novem

ber 2015 - YouTube
https://youtu.be/OrñJWgr_qf28
DSCF0050 Citv of Alexandria Council Meeti

ng October 2015 - YouTube
https://youtu.be/cqjSDcHGS3c
DSCF0051 City of Alexandria Council Meetln

a September 2015 - YouTube
https://youtu.be/qGavoOLEcRY
DSCF0055 Citv of Alexandria Council Meeti

nq June 2015 - YouTube
https://youtu.be/2qAc_YqdVUw
DSCF0056 Cltv of Alexandria Council

Meeting Mav 2015 - YouTube
https:Uyoutu.be/2qAc_YqdVUw
https://www.voutube.com/watch?v=poQ6u
HhSLXM City of Alexandria $602,000 Scam Coun
Feb 2016 - httgs://voutu.be/DoQBuHh cil Meeting
SLXM
httos:#www.voutube.com/watch?v=GDZ
BUkJv781 Cato Question where to go
- Licensed to Lie - On July 25, 2014 for Help with Sydney Powell
Janice Wolk Grenadier asked "Where
do you go for help when your
Due Process rights as an American Citize
n are violated?" You will be shocked by
https://youtu.be/GDZBUkJv781 the answer
3
We send young men and women into harms way to fight
for rights that we no longer have as Amerìcan
Citizens. It is very scary and until you are involv
ed in a Slippery Slope of the Collusion and Corru
the Judicial System - it is difficult to understan ption of
d.
The entire event can be heard at http://cdn.ca

to.org/archive-2014/cbf-...
Read more at:
• JAMJustice.orq
• www.ProSeAmerica.net
• @ProSeAm
• Facebook.com/JAMJusticel
• Facebook.com/jwgrenadler3
• Facebook.corn/ProSeAmerica
• Facebook.com/PSA-Your State Name
• www.ProSeAmerlca.blogspot.com
That the law ìs very clear: That Judge Clarks actions have turned back
tìme. Giving me less rights then ð slave.
someone under Title 42 US Code 1994 and Taking
Title 18 US Code 1581(a): Whoever holds
or returns any person to a condition of
PEONAGE, shall be fined under this title
for imprisoned not more than 20 years or
both. That on October 22, 2014 I was placed
in jail for failure to pay legal fees ìn 30
days which is a violation of my Thirteenth
Amendment "Neither Slavery not ìnvolu
servitude, except as punishment for ntary
a crime where of the party shall have
duly convìcted, shall exist within the
or any subject to their Jurisdiction". United States,
Furthermore the right by placing me
"under" a state Peonage / Involuntary
violating the Fourth Amendment right Servitude
by malicious prosecution, false Impri
sonment and unconstitutional arrest
of my Eight Amendment Right as to . This violation
Excessive Bail which in this case const
itutes "Restitution Bail" which furthe
knowledgeable malicious Intent to silenc r shows the
e me till the election was over on Novem
ber 4th. 2014. Bias, Retaliation and
Retribution to further line the Lawyers pockets by
Judge Clark.
Further: The system is one wher

e the Lawyers and Judges have
set it up to protect each other and
with Cash. line each others pockets
December 2015 - Defendant Janice

Wolk Grenadier Stands up and speak
s out against the Criminal Acts of Judge
Dawkins In Regard to his re-appoint Nolan
ment - In front of the Courts of Justic
e in the Virginia Legislature - Sever
also stood up and spoke out abou al other Victims
t the criminal actions of other Virgin
ia Judges Courts of Justice A group
Lawyers who practice In front of Elected Officials /
of these Judges
VOTED ALL JUDGE'S BACK INTO THER

E POSITIONS KNOWING THE CRIM
INAL ACTS & ACTIONS OF THE JUDG
ES
The Professional Code of Resp
onsibility of the Lawyers on the Cour
ts of Justice Rule 8 . 4 Misconduct
misconduct for a lawyer to: It ìs professional
(a) violate or attempt to violate

the Rules of Professional Conduct,
do so through the acts of ano knowingly assist or induce anot
her to do so, or
ther;
(b) commit a criminal or delibera
tely wrongful act that reflects
adversely on the lawyer's hon
or fitness to practice law; esty, trustworthiness
(c) engage in conduct involvin
g dishonesty, fraud, deceit
or misrepresentation which
lawyer's fitness to practice reflects adversely on the
law;
The Courts of Justice further

- GUARANTEES THE JUDGES
against complaints being inve
SELECTING THE JIRC ( The stigated by HAND
Judicial Inquiry and Review
Committee where complai
nts are filed against Judges
-and
4
never investigated - Read More at www.prose
america.blogspot.com the $602,000. SCAM
on the Virginia
Citizens
Guaranteeing all Judge's the ability to ignore the

law and rule to protect their own and as Judge Clark
clearly to his good friend Attorney Mich stated very
ael Weiser
"1 HAVE NO CHOICE BUT TO LET HER OUT OF

JAIL, I AM SO SORRY I CANNOT COLLECT YOUR
LEGAL FEES FOR YOU"
The Appearance and the collusion is that all

Judges in the State of Virginia have a Secret
"Handshake" of "You
Scratch my Back, lwill line you pockets
with WINS in the court room for your Client
s - Call me - Buy me Lunch or
Dinner or what ever - but, we will not
turn on our own"
So what about those young Men and

Women who go off to war to fight
for the Rights our Constitution Give'
Americans of Due Process? s
www.Valaw2010.blogspot.com
www.Scrlbd.com/Virginlalaw
Rico Information: Complaint:

https://www.scrlbd.com/doc/303506666/Ric
oRaci-2-v-4-FINAL-JWG-v Complaint-Octob
er-17-2015
Documents the Back up the Claims:

https://www.scrlbd.com/doc/30350817
7/USDC-VA-Exhibits-for-Rico-Rackering
-Jan-6 -2015
This picture / email says It all:
From: Rea. Mohsln [mailto.nlo

l-tsln.reza,0:t,outnl:-,n..,7,1<te
rs ,- o, Ìi]
Sir,t: Thursday, January
28. 2016 12:21 PM
To: Heba Girgls < HGI,gis '·ylls
kf,r,n .c, )!), ,: And rea Mc,se ley
<.tt,Ic,f,»(,.«' J·tlt,ì I : , , :.·.„, i,
Cc: Urla. Andy <A:,d
y.Urs ètc.î· troutl 1 , :kí ìtutn
dt·, s, C CJ, !) ,: Tho,Tipson. Asnley < ,-1 t.·*,
troufmansanders.coin, T)..,.. Ij'., 1" 1 .,
Subj • ct '. Grenadier . et .æl

. v . Grenadler , et dl . - Case
No . Cl 15003661
Hello , Heba and Andre

a.
ljust received Jarwce' s written state

ment though ìt appews to
havt been m &' Éd on Decw , Ibçr Zö Aíe you .t! 1
going to note an object,on or
just let Judge Clark deal with
it"
Thanks,
S. Mohsin Reza I TROUTM

AN SANDERS LLP
1850 Towers Crescent Pl
aza . Suire 500 . Tysons Cot
Tel: (703) 734-4351 net . Virginia 22182
1 Fax: (703) 448-6510
nìohs,n. reza@trol,trnans
ariclers .coin
Now he DOJ Joseph Guzinsk

i to ignore the crimes and to
state clearly that he is not goin
afraid of Retaliation and Ret g to investigate because he is
ribution
That the acts and actions of

Judge Kenny and Trustee Tho
mas Gorman are clear that they
criminal spree of Divorce Law are prejudice to protect the
yer Ilona Grenadier Heckma
become party to the crimes. n and 28 USC 1 states clea
rly if you do not report you
5
The Criminal Acts against Janice Wolk Grenadier:
Laws / Code Description
Bill of Rights 1. Freedom ofspeech

2. Frccdom of worship
3. Freedom from want
4. Freedom from fear
JANICE 1, This Count and each Claim herein assert deprivations ofconstitutional rights under color of law pursuant to
ILLEGAL 42 U.SC. § 1983 against Defendants as indicated per Claim.
JAILING AND 2. Each act alleged in this and each Count of this First Amended Complaint was
TORTURE
performed under color of law.
42 U.SC. § 1983, §
3. That all Defendants are aware of Janice's illegal jailing and have acted under the color of law to ignore and
1994 18 USC
1581(a) Violating to further cover it up to help make Plaintiff homeless and to further the criminal acts with new law suits for
4m and 8'b ill - gotten legal fees awarded by VA , Judges Wiermer and Clark for favor with Dimuro . and the Otd Boys
Amendment Network.
4. That your actions have turned back time. Giving me Janice less rights then a slave. Taking someone
under Title 42 US Code 1994 and Title 18 US Code 1581 ( a ): Whoever holds or returns any person to a
condition of PEONAGE, shall be fined under this title for imprisoned not more than 20 years or both. That
on October 22,2014 I was placed in jail for failure to pay legal fees in 30 days which is a violation ofiny
Thirteenth Amendment "Neither Slavery not involuntary servitude, except as Dunishment for a crime where
of the party shall have duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any subject to their
Jurisdiction". Furthermore the right by placing me "under" a state Peonage / Involuntary Servitude violating
thc Fourth Amendment right by malicious prosecution, false imprisonment and unconstitutional arrest. This
violation of my Eight Amendment Right as to Excessive Bail which in this case constitutes "Restítution
Bail" which further shows thc knowlcdgcable malicious intent to silence me till the election was over on
November 4th. 2014. Bias, Retaliation and Retribution to further line the Lawyers pockets by Judge Clark.
5. That Judge Clark had to release Janice Early after she snuck out documents stating to the other
attorneys "l am so sorry I can not collect your legwl fees"
42 U.S.C. § 1983 190. This is a Claim by Janice against Defendants for deprivation o f rights under color of law pursuant to 42 U,S.C.
§ 1983
191. All prior paragraphs are rc-alleged and incorporated as if set forth in full.
192.. That the COA Police by not following up on the harm that was threatened by Michael Stuart by all appearance
hired or as favor to Clark, Grenadier, DÌMuro, Wieser, Ilona, David et al to harm Janice and her girls
193. That the COA / VA sheriffs in warfare torture waking Janice up at night for sleep deprivation, moving Janice
around to disorient, the Magistrate threatening the safety of her daughters while she was in jail. the
extra pütting.
down when moving about was to intimidate further,
194.. In performing the acts attributed to them, used, threatened, and attempted to use unreasonable and
excessive
mental harassment upon Janice despíte Janice's lack ofphysical resistance, în deprivation of Janice's liberty
interest
to be free from excessive, unreasonable, or unnecessary force under the Fourth, Fifth, and Fourteenth
Amendments
to the Constitution ofthe United States ("EXCESSIVE FORCE and HARRASSMENT"). That
iii Jail documents,
papers, and effects against unreasonable search and seizure under the Fourth and Fourteenth
Amendments to the
Constitution of the United States, ("SEARCH AND SEIZURE").
195.. Upon seizing Janice, Defendants at no time advised Janice of any other crime
then $8,100.00 in lega! fees for
lawyers that had lied in court, lied in court documents of any crime she was
accused of committing in deprivation of
his right to be notified ofall charges against her secured by the Fifth, Sixth,
and Fourteenth Amendments of the
Constitution ofthe United States ("PROCEDURAL DUE
PROCES").
196,. In so acting, Defendants intended and did deprive, retaliatc for, oppress,
and chill
Janice's PUBLIC BENEFIT ACTIVITIES, rights to freedom ofspeech,
expression, privacy, and association,
secured by the First, Fifth, and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constituti
on ofthe United States and
("EXPRESSION, PRIVACY, and ASSOCIATION");
6
197. In so acting, Defendants did deprive, interfere with, impede, hinder, delay, and oppress
Janice's past, ongoing,
and future of DUE ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE securcd by the First, Fifth, and Fourteenth
Amendments to
the Constitution of the United States ("ACCESS TO JUSTICE");
198. In so acting, Defendants were aware of Janice's standing up and speaking out as an advocate for each ofthe
EQUAL PROTECTION CLASSES and acted intending to deprive Janice ofher rights as a such in violation
to his
rights to the equal protection of the laws secured by the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution
ofthe
United States ("EQUAL PROTECTION .\.
198. . In inflicting this Janice'sjail time was abusively, violently, and in front of professional
in the court at the
time ofarrest. Defendants injured and assaulted, and intentionally, oppressively, and maliciously
humiliated, embarrassed, and defamcd Janice as detailed more fully elsewhere,

constituting a deprivation of
Janice's right not to be subjected to cruel and unusual punishment for being
poor and ofa conceived lower
class by thc Defendants under the Fifth, Eighth, and Fourteenth
Amendments to the Constitution ofthe
United States (" CRUEL AND/ OR UNUSUSAL PUNISHMENT ").
199.. In so acting, Defendants CULPABLY and UNREASONABLY brcached

one or more PROFESSIONAL
DUTIES. causing foreseeable injury to Janice in deprivation of Janice's right to not be
deprived of life,
liberty, or property without due process oflaw secured by the Fifth and
Fourteenth Amendments to the
Constitution ofthe United States ("SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS
").
200. Defendants performed the acts attributed to them in agreement
and coordination with one or more other
Defendants as elsewhere detailed.
201.. As an actual and foreseeable result, Janice has been deprived of

state and federal constitutional rights,
damaged, and injured in a nature and amount to be proven at trial.
42 U.S.C. § 1983 209. This is a Claim by Janice against VA and USA for deprivation of rights
under color of law pursuant to 42
This is against the U.S.C. § 1983
State of Virginia
210. All prior paragraphs are re-alleged and incorporated as ifset forth
and the United in full.
211 . The above Judges were at relevant times a Judge o f the USDC
States of America District of Columbia , USDC Eastern Division o f
for the actions of Virginia or Circuit CouM Judges in the State of Virginia . an employee
of Defendant ' s USA or VA a coordinator in the
Judge Donald Janice Jailing. and an agent of USA or VA.
Haddock, Judge 212. On information and belief, in performing the acts attributed
to them in the Janice jailing, the above Judges acted
Lisa Kemler, Judge as a supervisor, director, and principal of De fcndants USA or VA.
Each Janice jailing COORDINATOR, in their
Nolan Dawkins, activities elsewhere described.
Judge Thomas
213. On information and belief, Defendant's collaborated with USA
Fortkort, Judge J. and or VA COURT, to plain and participate in
the Janicejailing . (" PLANNING AND DELIVERY "),
Howe Brown, with extra notices to confirm Janice would be in court .
Judge James J. 214. In performing the actions in the Janice Jailing and the
USA and VA are CULPABLY and UNREASONABLY
McGrath, Judge breached one or more PROFESSIONAL DUTIES, causing
reasonably foreseeable constitutional deprivation to
Richard Bowen Janice in violation of Janice's rights to SUBSTANTIV
E DUE PROCESS.
Potter, Chief Judge 215. In committing the actions as alleged in the Janice Jailing
the USA and VA, in collaboration and agreement with
Mary Grace
each other including lawyers Wieser. DiMuro, Grenadicr Janice Jailing
O'Blren, Judge COORDINATOR's, subjeeted Janice or
caused her to be subjected to deprivation of rights, prívilege
Carroll A. Weimcr s, and immunities relating to SEARC}1 AND SEIZUREI
Jr., Judge Richard SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS; PROCEDURAL
DUE PROCESS; EXPRESSION, PRIVACY, and
J. McCue, Judge ASSOCIATION; ACCESS TO JUSTICE; EXCES
SIVE FORCE; and CRUEL AND/OR UNUSUSAL
Donald Kent, PUNISHMENT.
Judge James E. 216. As an actual and foreseeable result, PLAINITFF
has been deprived, damaged, and injured as etsewhc
Boasberg, Judge re alleged
for life.
Judge Beryl A.
Howell, Judge
Reggie Walton,
Judge Ricard Leon,
Judge Gerald Lee,
Judge Rudolph
Contreras, Judge
Leona Brinkema
42 U.S.C. § 1983 217. This is a Claim by Janice Jailing

against Defendants VA Judge McGrath,
Fortkort, Brown, McGrath, Dawkins,
7
Against VA - Kemler and Haddock for deprivation of rights under color of law pursuant to 42 U . S . C . § 1983
Judges McGrath, 218. All prior paragraphs are re-alleged and incorporated as if set forth in full.
Fortkort, Brown
219. Defendants at all times relevant to this Count and Claim was, are or were a Judge ofthe state ofVirginia
McGrath,
and worked in collusion to coordinate between September o f 2007 and January of 2012 to prevent Due Process
Dawkins, Kemler
and Had(lock and coordinated in Ex-parte communications to protect one of there own Divorce Lawyer Ilona Grenadjer
Heckman.
220. On information and belief, Defendants McGrath, Fortkort, Brown, McGrath, Dawkins, Kemler and
Haddock were a collaborator with DÍMuro, Wieser and Grenadier, Ilona and possibly other Janice Jail
COORDINATORS in the PLANNING AND DELIVERY,
221. The above in there Bias Orders, allowing Lawyers to Lie in court, Lie in Court documents in performing
the actions in the Jailing of Janice and this Count 1, They are CULPABLY and UNREASONABLY breached
one or more PROFESSIONAL DUTIES, causing reasonably foreseeable constitutional deprivation to Janice in
violation of Janice's rights to SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS,
222. In performing the actions described in this Count 1 with each other Defendants as alleged, subjected Janice or
caused Janice to bc subjected to deprivation of rights, privileges, and immunitics relating to SEARCH AND
SEIZURE; SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS; EXPRESSION, PRIVACY, and ASSOCIATION; ACCESS TO
JUSTICE ; EXCESSIVE FORCE ; CRUEL AND/OR UNUSUSAL PUNISHMENT . When the Judges und
Lawyers Self Policing did not In any way stop or correct their errors they committed Fraud on the court.
Violating That all "ORDERS ARE VOID" Due to the Judges lack of Jurisdiction. VA Code 17.105 (b) and VA
Code § 8.01-428. Setting aside default judgments; clerical mistakes; independent actions to relieve party from
judgment or proceedings; grounds and time limitations.
A. Defaultjudgments and decreespro confesso; sui,müry procedure. - Upon ,Iotion of the plaintiffor
judgment debtor and after reaso ,wtble notice to the opposite party, his attorney ofrecord or
other clgeitt,
the court may set aside a judgment by defautt or a decree pro confesso upoit the foltowing grounds
: (i)
fraud on the court, (iì) a void judgment, (üi) on proofofan accord and satisfaction, or (ìv) on
proof that
the defendant was, at the time ofservice ofprocess or entry ofjudgme,it, a person in the military
service
ofthe United Statesfor purposes of 50 U. S. C. app. § 502. Such motion on the ground offraud on the
court shall b¢ made within two
years from the dute of the judg,nent or decr
223. As an actual and foreseeable result, PLAINITFFS have been deprived, damaged, and
injured as elsewhere
alleged.
224. This is a Claim by Janice against Defendant USA. For deprivation of rights under color of law
pursuant to
Against Defendants 42 U.S.C.§ 1983
USA Judges
227. All prior paragraphs are re-alleged and incorporated as ifset forth in full.
Boasberg, Howell,
228. USA Judges at all times relevant to this Count had thc ability to stop the Jailing
Walton, Leon, Lee of Janice if they had
and Contreras, followed the law and allowed her equal access to the courts.
Ginsburg, Rogers, 229. On information and belief, Janice was denied equal access due to being poor
and the personal relationships
Srinivaåan and the above Judges had with other Defendants working and religious. These
Judges collaboratoi· the other
Brinkema, Doe Defendants to coordinate the Jailing of Janice.
230 . On information and belief, these Judges met with one or more other Defendant
s to
COORDINATOR the cover up of the criminal acts and actions of the other
Defendants and especialiy Divorce
Lawyer Ilona Ely Grenadier Heckman who hates Catholics
.
231. On information and belief, Defendants communicated with others
who COORDINATED THE Jailing of
Janice.
234. In performing the actions iii the Ordcrs or lack of Orders
allowing Due Process and this Count I, the above
Judges arc CULPABLY and UNREASONABLY breached
one or more PROFESSIONAL DUTIES, causing
reasonably foreseeable constitutional deprivation to Janice
in violation of Janice's rights to SUBSTANTIVE
DUE PROCESS.
235. In performing the actions described in this Count
1 with each other Defendants caused Janice to be
subjected to deprivation of rights, privileges, and immuní
tíes relating to SEARCH AND SEIZURE;
SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS; EXPRESSION,
PRIVACY, and ASSOCIATION; ACCESS TO JUSTIC
E;
EXCESSIVE FORCE ; CRUEL AND / OR
UNUSUSAL PUNISHMENT .
236. As an actual and foreseeable result, PLAIN
ITFFS have been deprived, damaged, and injured
as elsewhere
8
alleged.
42 U.S.C. § 1983
Against Defendants
237. This is a Claim by Janice against the above
Defendants AND ASSOCIATES for deprivation
GRENADIER of rights
under color of law pursuant to 42 U.S.C
LAW, WIESER, . § 1983 .
238. All prior paragraphs are rc-allcgcd and
REED, RICH, incorporated as ifset forth in full.
BWW, 239. Above defendant at all times rcleyant to
this Count 1 was a practicing attorney and notorio
us member of the
TROUTMAN, "Old Boys Network" in Virginia , in conjunc
tion with the USA and VA COURT ' s , employee
, owner , and agent
PARKER, of Defendants different law firms were a ware
ofand help to coordinate the Cover up o f Ilona
KELLER,VSB, and Grenadler
Law.
DIMURO and
240. On information and belief, the above met
Ilona, Gundtch with one or more Janice Jailing COORDINAT
ORS.
241. On information and belief, the above
communicated with other Janice Jailing
COORDI NATORS.,
Discussing Plaintiffs' PUBLIC BENEFIT
ACTIVITIES, DUE ADMINISTRATION
OF JUSTICE, and her
participation in exposing the Corruption
in thc Judiciary, the Government and Electe
d Officials. The members of
thc Old Boys Network have comm
ented to the effect of " that ' s why we have to
do what we do ." Meaning
Jailing Janice to Silence her or through
warfare torture have her commit Suicide.
Thc Old Boys Network cannot
afford more Murder for Hire.
248, In performing the actions in the Janice
Jailing and this Count I, the above Lawye
rs and associates of the
firms are CULPABLY and UNREASON
ABLY breached one or more PROFESSIO
NAL DUTIES, causing
reasonably foreseeable constitutional depriv
ation to Janice in violation ofJanice's rights
to SUBSTANTIVE
DUE PROCESS.
249. In performing the actions described
in this Count 1 with each other Defendants
as allcged, thc above
subjectcd Janice or caused Janice to be
subjected to deprivation ofrighlS, privile
ges, and immunities relating to
SEARCH AND SEIZURE; SUBS
TANTIVE DUE PROCESS; EXPR
ESSION, PRIVACY, and
ASSOCIATION; ACCESS TO JUST
ICE; EXCESSIVE FORCE, CRUEL
AND/OR UNUSUSAL
PUNISHMENT.
250. As an actual and foreseeable result,
PLAINITFFS have been deprived, damag
ed, and injured as elsewhere
alleged.
Retaliation 251. This is a Claim by Janice agains

t all Defendants for deprivation
of rights under color of law pursu
42 U.S.C. § 1983 ant to 42
U.S.C. § 1983 by efforts to retalia
te against Plaintiffs for telling the
"TRUTH" supposedly your best defens
Against all COMPLAINT I and the DUE ADM e.
INISTRATION OF JUSTICE in
Defendants the Janice Jail ing
252. All prior paragraphs are
rc-alleged and incorporated as
if set forth in full.
254. On information and belief,
upon a meeting with Judge Giam
mittorio it is believed the Schem
process and to allow the " TUR e to deny due
TH " of the criminal acts of Ilona ,
Erika and David and al ! other Defen
going to be denied in any type dants was
of Open Court room.
260. In performing the actions descri
bed in this Count 1 with each other
Defendants as alleged, subjected
or caused her to be subjected to depriv Janice
ation of rights, privileges, and inunun
itics relating to SEARCH AND
SEIZURE; SUBSTANTIVE DUE
PROCESS; EXPRESSION, PRIV
ACY, ACCESS TO JUSTICE;
EXCESSIVE FORCE; CRUEL
AND/OR UNUSUSAL PUNISHM
ENT.
261. As an actual and foreseeabl
e result, PLAINITFFS have been
deprived, damaged, and injure
alleged. d as elsewhere
Retaliation 262 . This is a Claim by Janice again

st Defendants VA , VSB for depriv
ation ofrights under color of law pursua
to 42 U,S.C. § 1983 nt
42 U.S.C. § 1983 By
263. All prior paragraphs arc re-all
Judge Donald Kent eged and incorporated as i f set forth
in full.
264. On information and belie
and his x-wife f, February of 2011 after many
phone calls starting on around
assistant to Patsy Ticer a meet November 3,2008 with
Martha Kent ing is had -even though I live
walking distance in Alexandr
to go down to Richmond whic ia - to have meeting I had
h she was still toooo busy to meet
with inc and set me up with an
claimed ot be her assistant - older womcn who
I would find out later that was
a "LIE " Instead : set me up
of Judge Kent. I will not be spine with Martha Kent x - wife
less like Martha Kent and Patsy
Ticer and allow a bunch ofovergro
"BULLIES" to control me as wn
they have them. After listening
to my story - she said to me
:
" Do you know who I am?"
no
9
"1 am the x - wife of Judge
Donald Kent" Martha Kent
"I have walked in your shoc
s - you can't win this"
" Me and My family can't
get a fair trial either"
" You are no longçr one
ofthem
Defendants VA, COA and VSB

have ignored this and all other
allegations determined to retal
for her involvement with expo iate against Janice
sing the TRUTH.
272. In performing the actions
described in this Count 1 with
each other Defendants as alleg
subjected Janice or caused her ed, Defendants
to be subjected to deprivation
of rights, privileges, and imm
SEARCH AND SEIZURE; uniti es relating to
SUBSTANTIVE DUE PRO
CESS; EXPRESSION, PRI
ASSOCIATION; ACCESS VAC Y, and
TO JUSTICE; EXCESSIVE
FORCE, CRUEL AND/OR
PUNISHMENT. UNUSUSAI-
273 . As an actual and foreseea

ble result, PLAINITFFS have
alleged. been deprived , damaged , and
injured as elsewhere
42 U.S.C. § 1983
274. This is Claim by Janice
against Senator Mark Warner
Against and Patsy Ticer for deprivati
of law pursuantto 42 U.S. on o f rights under color
Defendant C. § 1983 for planning, supc
rvising and implementing
others in violation of PLA the Janice Jailing and acts
INTIFS' rights, privileges of
USA, VA, and immunities.
COA 275. Senator Mark Warner "elec
ted by the residents of the State
of Virginia. By all news repo
of his own self that he offer rts and reporting
ed a Judgeship to the daughter
October 11,2014 - Breaking
Warner and aid to Gov news Senator Mark
ernor Terry Mckuliffe guilty
and admit to offering a Fede
Phil Puckett on or around ral Judg eship to daughter of
October 14 , 2014 - Janice expo
ses on Blog VaI. aw2010 . blog
corruption by Senator War spot . com information of
ner.
276. On or around October
22, 2014 - November 12, 2014
- 22 days Janice illegally
the City of Alexandria, Soli jailed and tortured in
taire Confinement till 5pm
on Election day Tuesday, Nov
Jailed to : 1 . Silence ember 4,2014. Illegally
her and stop exposure
of e - mails between herself and Mark
çorn:Dtion in thc Judiciarv. Warner ' s office on the
Janice went to Mark Warner
for help instead he had her
was exposed his " Pay to Play jailed, at lhe same time it
" with a Federal Judgeship for
a favor . Being ignored by the Sena
Committee. Janice out ofre te Ethics
taliation was held in Solitaire
Confincmcnt iii! 5 pm on Elec
2 . To Bully / scare her tion day by Defendants.
into either committing Suicide
or to turning thc other chcck
holding Virginia and the Fede of the corruption and not
ral Judiciary, the Government
and Elected Officials accounta
criminal acts and actions of ble, as well as the
the Old Boys Network in Virg
inia The State of Virginia
and official capacities. is sued for his individual
f, Senator Mark Warner in
a close race was aware of such
activities, and acted at all speech and political
times herein with the inte
nt to retaliate, deprive, inte
activities in deprivation of rfere with, and oppress such
Janice and Janice's rights
to SPEECH, ASSOCIATI
TO JUSTICE; and SUB ON, and PRIVACY; ACC
STANTIVE DUE PROCES ESS
S.
281. On information
and belief, at all time
s mentioned in this Com
defendan plaint VA has been uwure ofhi
ts' acts relating to Janice and s co-
the DUE ADMINISTRATIO
BENEFIT ACTIVITIES. N OF JUSTICE, and Plaintiff
s' PUBLIC
283. In performing these
actions, VA is CULPAB
LY and UNREASONABL
PROFESSIONAL DUTIE Y breached onc or more
S, causing reasonably fore
seeable constitutional dep
Janice's rights to SUBST rivation to Janice in viol
ANTIVE DUE PROCES ation of
S.
284. In performing the
actions described iii this
Count 1 with each other
as alleged, VA / Senator Defendants
Mark Warner subjected
Janice or caused her to be
privileges, and immuni subjected :o deprivation of
ties relating to SEARC rights,
H AND SEIZURE; PRO
SUBSTANTIVE DUE CE DURAL DUE PROCES
PROCESS; EXPRESSIO S;
N, PRIVACY, and ASS
EXCESSIVE FORCE; OCIATION; ACCESS
CRUEL AND/OR UN TO JUSTICE,
USUSAL PUNISHMEN
285. As an actual and fore T.
seeable result, PLAINI
TFFS have been deprive
alleged. d, damaged, and injured
as elsewhere
42 U.S.C. § 1983
300. This a Claim by
Chilling Janice against Defend
ants, its associates, mem
deprivation of rights und bers and affiliates, and
er color oflaw pursua Janice, tor
ntto 42 U.S,C, § 1983
Jailing of Janice in vio forplanningand particip
lation of PLAINTIFS' ating in the illegal
rights, privileges and imm
unities, causing "chill"
ofexisting and
10
further protected activity.
301. All prior paragraphs are re-all
eged and incorporated as ifset forth
in full,
302. Defendants were aware of the
Criminal Acts of Divorce Lawyer Ilona
Grenadier Heckman
303. Defendants disfavored Janice
from PUBLIC BENEFIT ACTIVIT
IES; Plaintiffs' "JUDGES BEHAVIN
BADLY" MESSAGE, the DUE ADM G
INISTRATION OF JUSTICE, and
Plaintiffs' ongoing.
304. Defendants' organized and
committed the Jailing of Janice to
deprive, intimidate, thwart, retali
chill the same ("CHILL"). ate for, and
305. Plaintiffs and others at or aware

of thc Janice Jailing were CHILLED;
frightened, intimidated,
demoralized, thwarted, and emotionally
traumatized by Defendants' activities.
306. As an actual and foreseeable
result, Janice, and affiliates have since
been deterred, intimidated, deprived,
abandoned further PUBLIC or
BENEFIT ACTIVITY , and
DUE ADMINISTRAITON OF JUST
disaôsociated, avoided inter ICE, disse mble d,
actions with onc another.
307. Janice's clients, profession
al colleagues, and affiliates at or
aware ofthe Janice Jailing who
high opinions of Janice and provi previously had
ded or referred PLAÏNTIFS signi
ficant busincss opportunities, stopp
associating with, providing or ed
referring such opportunities out
of fear ofreprisal by De fenda
308. In performing the actions descr nts.
ibed in this Count and the Janice
Assault, Jailing
the COORDINATORS and each
ofthem, in CULPABLE and UNR
EASONABLE breach of one or
PROFESSIONAL DUTIES, have more
subjected Janice her affiliates, or
caused them to deprivation of their
privileges, and immunities rclat rights,
ing to SUBSTANTIVE DUE
PROCESS; EXPRESSION, PRIV
ASSOCIATION; and ACCESS ACY, and
TO JUSTICE.
309. As an actual and foreseeab
le result of the acts of each Defe
ndant to this Count 1, Janice affili
been dcprived, damaged, and ates, have
injured in their persons and prop
Virginia State Law erty in a manner and amount to
be proven at trial.
Claims
This is a Count against Defendan
ts consisting ofsupplemental
Claims under Virginia slatc law
Claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and a single
based thereon.
Breach of 314. This is a Claim by Janice for

breach of contract and covenant
Contract, Covcnant of good faith and fair dealing unde
state law and 42 U.S.C. r Virginia
§ 1983
of Good Faith and
re-alleged and incorporated as
Fair Dealing ifset forth in full.
316. In committing the Janic
e Jail ing Defendant UNREAS
ONABLY and CUI-PABLY
rights under the CONTRACT deprived Janice of her
without cause, nolice, justificat
ion, or abatemenl, thereby breü
317. Based on Defendant COA ching the contract.
, VA participation in the Janic
e Jailing ENTERPRISES, and
acts alleged herein, its acts in other CULPABLE
breach of contract were in bad
faith, malicious, fraudulent, and
breach of the coyenant of good oppressive, in
faith and fair dealing.
318. As an actual and fore
seeable result, Janice has bccn
damaged or injured in a
nature and amount to be prov
en at trial.
Wrongful
319. This is a Claim by Janic
Inducement to e for wrongful inducement
to breach contract, breach of
fair dealing. wrongful interferenc covenant of good faith and
Breach Contract, e with prospcctivc contractual i·clüti
COORDINATOR Defenda urtó, and defamation againsl all
Janice
Covenant of Good nts under Virginia State law
and 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Faith and Fair 320 . A ! 1 prior paragraphs
arc re- alleged and incorpor
ated as ifset forth in full .
Dealing 321. Dcfcndants and each of
them were aware of the righ
Against Janice ts to Real Property stolen by
Grenadier under VA CON Divorce Lawyer Ilona
TRACT law and the covenant
of good faith and fair dealing
Jalling the Janice Jailing and ASS attendant thereto, prior to
AULT, and by their UNREAS
COORDINATOR ONABLE and CULPABLE
more PROFESSIONAL DUT actions in breach ofone or
Defendants IES expcctcd and intended
their actions to cause the brea
322. As an actual and fore ch thereof.
seeable result, USA, VA and
COA did UNREASONABL
the Janice CONTRACT Y and CULPABLY breach
and covenant ofgood faith
and fair dealing attendant
and injuries in a nature ther eto, causing Janice damages
and amount to be proven
Interference with at tria!.
323. This is a Claim by
Economic Janice for wrongful inte
rference with existing and
defamation against Jan prospective cconontic rela
Relations ice. 42 U.S.C. § 1983 tions, and
Against Janice 324. All prior paragraph
s are re-alleged and inco
rporated as ifset forth
Jatling 325. Janice Jailers and in full.
COORDINATOR Defend
ants knew or should hav
COORDINATOR BENEFIT ACTIVITIE e known of Plaintiffs' PUB
S and Janice's professi LIC
on and POSITION UN
Defendants existing and potential DE R THE UNITED STATES
economic relations as , and the
an Entrepreneur.
11
325. Janice's ASSAULT COORDINATOR Defendants knew or should have known that committing each act's
as the blogjwgrenadierisalair.blogspot,com in thc Janice's ASSAULT would wrongfully
interfere with such
relations. That in December of 2015 a new blog which is still on the web along with continuing e-mails making
the harassment the slander and libel a continuing occurrence by Ilona Grenadier Heckman and her gang the
blog is janicewolkgrenadierinjail.blogspot.com That Janice viewed it as recently as November
11, 2015 -
where Ilona and her gang is calling Janice a Terrorist.
326. Defendants knew or should have known that causing or contributing to thc Janice Jailing
would damage
Janice, and cause resulting business income loss for My Pillow Pack,
327. In performing the acts ascribed to them in the Janice Jailing and Count 1, De fendants to this Count
2
actually and proximately caused Janice to suffer lost business opportunities, revenue, and goodwill
in a nature
and amount to be proven at trial.
328. Defendants knew or should have known that causing or contributing to the Janice Jailing
would damage
Janice, and ©(tu~ resulting injury and loss to Janice and her business ventures. Which defendants
where aware
of with the help ofthe Ilona Gang and (hc Blogs calling Janice a Homosexual and Aniti
Christ forging e-mails et
al were criminal libel and discriminatory towards Janice.
329. In performing the acts as described to them in the Janice Jail and Count 1, De fendants to
this Count 2
actually and proximately caused PLAINITFFS to suffer lost business opportunities, revenue,
and goodwill in a
nature and amount to be proven at trial.
330. As an actual and forcsccable rcsult, Plaintiffs have been deprivcd, damaged and injured
in a nature and
amount to be proven at trial.
Defamation, Libel 331. This is Claim by Janice against all DEFENDANTS by virtue ofthe defamatory
and extreme and
and Slander outrageous nature of their conduct, causing severe mental distress and constitution
al deprivation thereby.
332. All prior paragraphs are re-alleged and incorporated as if set forth in full.
333. In performing the acts ascribed to them in the Janice Jailing and each Claim of Counts
1 and 2, Defendants,
and each of them, knew or should have known that Janice was an entrepreneu
r maintaining of business,
personal, and professional relationships in the City of Alexandria
since April of 1983.
334. Defendants further knew or should havc known that the açts of assaulting, and statements
insulting,
accusing, and humiliating Janice as described above in front of millions by way
ofthe web ofher professional
colleagues, clients, and judges would defame and injure her reputation, cause her severe
emotional distress, loss
of business opportunities, and resulting loss o f income, and jeopardize Janice and her girls lives.
335. In [ight ofsaid knowledge and other facts alleged herein, each Defendant'
s actions in each Claim of Count
1 and the Janice Jail ing defamed and injured Janice's reputation
for life.
336. All statements and acts causing such injury to Janice were false, misleading,
and unjustified.
337. As an actual and foreseeable result, Janice has been damaged and injured jn
a nature and amount to bc
proven at trial.
Intentional
Infllctlon of 338. This is Count by Janice against a]1 DEFENDANT's
for injury by virtue ofthe defamatory and extreme and
Emotional Distress outrageous nature of their conduct, causing severe mental distress and constitutiona
l deprivation thereby.
339. AII prior paragraphs arc re-alleged and incorporated as
ifset forth in full.
340. In performing each acts ascribed to them in the Janice's
Jialing the Blogs, thc Threats on her life and her
girls life's and well being and each Claim of Count 1,
each Defendant intended to cause, or acted in reckless
disregard of the likelihood of causing and did cause
Janice extreme emotional distress.
341. As an actual and foreseeable result ofthe Janice
Jailing Lhe Gang like harassment by Judges, Lawyers,
the
City of Alexandria, and the State of Virginia as well
as Federal Judiçiary and each Defendant's actions
in each
Claim of Count 1, Janice has in fact suffered severe
emotional distress and resulting loss to business
opportunities and income,
42 U.S.C. § 1983 342. This is a Claim by Janice against Defendants

/ COORDINATOR's for deprivation of SUBSTA
TNIVE
DUE PROCESS by virtue of each prior Claim
in this Count pursuantto 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Inducement to 343. All prior paragraphs are re-alle
ged and incorporated as if set forth
in full.
Breach Contract, 344. Defendants and each of them were aware
of Plaintiffs and their affiliates, PLAITNIFFFS'
Covenant o f Good PUBLIC
BENEFFIT ACTIVIES and the Patent pending
for My Pillow Pack.
Faith and Fair 345. Defendants, and each of them, CULPA
BLY planned, coordinated, communicated
, and çooperated with
Dealing each other to induce and affect the Janice Jailing
and torture ASSAULT knowing and intendin
g the same to bc a
12
breach of the CONTRACT and covcnants thereto.
346. In committing each act alleged in each Claim ofthis Count, each Defendant intended and expected to
further the purposes of each ENTERPRISE which the Defendant is affiliated with, including all "racketeering
activity" ofthose ENTERPRISES as that tenn is deflncd in l 8 U,S.C. § ]961(1). As such, each açt alleged in
each Claim herein constitutes an act "involving" the predicate crimes of kidnapping, robbery, bribery, and
extortion alleged in Racketeering Counts.
347. In committing each act as described in this Count, Janice Jailing COORDINATOR Def¢ndants deprived
PLAINITFF of rights relating to SEARCH AND SEIZURE, SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS, EXPRESSION,
PRIVACY, and ASSOCIATION; EXCESSIVE FORCE; and CRUEL AND/OR UNUSUSAL PUNISHMENT.
348. As an actual and foreseeable result of the Janice Jailing / Blogs / Threats on her life and each Defendant's
actions in each Claim of Count 1, Janice has in fact suffered severe emotional distress and resulting loss to
business opportunities and income.
Malicious 349 . This is a Count by Janice against all Defendants , including and not [ imitcd to other John and Jane Doe ' s
Prosecution, not listed as Defendants in the Janice Jailing ASSAULT COORDINATORS for deprivation of
Obstructlon of
rights under color of law pursuantto 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This Count sets forth a series of related crimes of abuse
Justlce
of color of law authority and legal process to impose duress, undue influence, retaliation, and oppression on
42 U.S.C. §
Plaintiffand her girls. These acts include obstruction ofjustice, malicious prosecution, perjury, prosecutorial
1983
misconduct, kidnapping, and cxtortion under state and federal law, and form the factual basis of PLAITNIFFS'
Claims to several Racketeering Counts, and tolling by duress, fraud, and undue influence.
350. The General Allegations to this Count identify both immune and non-immune act:. The Claims ofthis
Count are based only on the non-immune acts. Other acts are relevant to legal issues not relevant to the claims of
this Count such as racketeering activity, fraud, duress and undue influence, to which immunity is not a defense.
351. For all actions relevant to this Count, all De fendants and each of them, acted under color oflaw to interfere
with, dcter, deprive, and rctaliate for Plaintiffs' exercise of rights, privileges, and inimunities under the
Constitution of the United States and the Constitution ofthe State of Virginia.
352. In performing each act attributed to thcm in this Count, CITY ATTORNEY DEFENDANTS COA were
bound under the following PROFESSIONAL DUTIES: CONSTITUT[ONAL (non-discretionary), and
REASONABLE CARE.
GENERAL 353. Shortly after a meeting with the COA Mayor, COA Police, and the COA attorney Janice, e-mailed and
ALLEGATIONS mailed a letter to the Attorney General, the Governor of Virginia and e-mailed the remainder a Demand letter as
TO COUNT 3
requested. Such letter has been ignored. Demanding compensation for the injuries Janice suffered in thc Covcr
up ofthe Criminal Acts of Divorce Lawyer Ilona Grenadìer Heckman the Defendants and at the hands ot'thc
The COA, VA and
Shcriffs in jail. (the "CLAIM AND DEMAND").
USA Claim and
Demand 354. The CLAIM AND DEMAND outlined facts consistent with those set forth in this Complaint..
355. Janice received either no answcr or an answer they felt they had no liability to Janice.
357. Defendants' records will reflect that e-mail or ignoring gives thc appearance of
summarily denied liability
for the Janice's Jailing et al with no speçific erplanation. That no defense was given
as lo tcgally right to do to
Janice what has been done.
368. Recognizing the scope of the dispute, the number ofquestionable Suicidcs that surround
the Old Boys
Network, along with MURDER FOR HIRE Janice is afraid for her and her girl's lives, That
the Defendants are
and have became intimidated and frightened Janice by there actions, and statements. Considered
to be a very real
threat to his personal security.
371. On information and belief, by Police, Judges and other lawyers also aware of
Plaintiffs' PUBLIC
BENEFIT ACTIVITIES and DUE ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE, including
the Jailing COORDINATOR
Defendants' hostility to such activity - Defendants and their representa
tives therefore acted ín conspiracy and
ENTERPRISE to protect Defendants own interests, the interests ofits
insured's and their affiliates to oppress
and impede the CLAIM AND DEMAND, and impose further HARASSM
ENT and ABUSE of Plaintiff.
372. In doing so, USA, VA and COA imposed duress, intimidation,
fcar, and opprcssion which did in fact cause
Janice to cease pursuing the CLAIM AND DEMAND, the DUE ADMINIS
TRATION OF JUSTICE, and
initiation ofthis Action.
Prosecutorial Misconduct of Assistant City Attorney

City of Alexandria Megan Roberts, George
Mckndrews , James L . Banks Jr , Corine Parks
Paralegal , Ms . Gerry and Ms Chrlstiu Brown ,
13
Commonwealth Attorney's office
373. On about October 10,2014, on information and belief, The City Attorneys and
the Commonwealth
Attorney interfered in Police Report on the corruption in the
COA Courts.
374. That prior to this the City of Alexandria Attorneys to harass
Janice filed suit over gutters and an RV in her
drive way legally parked, That the use of COA employees to intimidate and
to harass Janice has been an on
going criminal act.
375. Janice has now endured years in persecution as a result of such outrageous
behavior. Janice appears today
to redress those acts for herself and, she prays, thousands of others who have suffered similar
and even more
outrageous insults, violations, dcprivations, and injuries under the indecency
of those who today occupy offices
of honor, yet who regularly debase those offices while driven by motives no one,
perhaps not even they
themselves, could honor.
376. Such behavior was intended to retaliate, obstruct, and deprive Janice
ofrights, privileges and immunities
under state and federal Constitutions. Janice subsequent arrest, imprisonm
ent, injury, and severe mental distress
constitute numerous serious felonies under state and federal law, as detailed
through out this Complaint.
377 . COA Police , the FBI and others acts in investigating , manipulat
ing evidence , witnesses , and the Virginia
and Federal Judiciary / Courts and initiating the prosecut
ion of Janice jòr exposing the criminal acts ofthe
Judiciary, the Government and Elected Omcial matter
constitute CULPABLE and UNREASONABLE breach
ofonc or more PROFESSIONAL DUTIES, and have foreseeably resulted
in deprivations of Janice's clearly-
established rights under the First Amendment to the Constitution of
the United States. Such acts are not immune
from criminal accountability, and those on which the Claims of this
Count are based, are not immune from civil.
378. These acts ofthe Defendants will bc rcfcrrcd to as Defendants PERJURY
ONE.
379. That Janice will be able to show that all Lawyers in this
suit have lied in Court, lied in Court documents to
Cover up Criminal Acts of Divorce Lawyer Ilona Grenadier or
the other Defendants
379 That PERJURY TWO was to interfere with and retaliate for Plaintiffs'
PUBLIC BENEFIT ACTIVITIES
and the DUE ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE.
382. On information and belief, Defendants did so with the knowledg
e and support of, all o f whoin
acted with the specific intent to retaliate against Janice for telling
the "TRUTH" and exposing the continuing
criminal acts and actions ofthe Defendants . DEFEN
DANTS caused Janice to be imprisoned without probable
cause causing a false imprisonment for 22 days. At the time
Janice was imprisoned by Defendants the Judges
and others knew or should have known of the perjuries and
retaliatory nature ofthe Old Boys Network.
(FALSE IMPRISONMENT 1).
385. Janicc was jailcd for being poor was the appearance bü.,
ít weilt much deeper which will be proven at lr,al.
Judicial 387. On October 22,2014 Judge James Clark bias

to protecting his friends, Having been asked several
times lo
Misconduct recuse himself refused. That even today ass this is being written the Defenda
nts have filed a new suit with a new
Scheme to further forever harm Janice.
388. That the Judiciary in the Federal Governm

ent and the State o f Virginí., is ü disaster. That
in the past it has
been mostly Blacks that they have had to deal with
and could intimidate and be Disingenuous as no one
wus
going to stand up for them. That in Virginia
the Old Boys Network has intimidated und
make it clear to lawyers
that they will loose there license ifthey don't
do as told, This is changing the new face
ofwho the Federal
Government, Virginia and these defendants
are dealing with are white people. Who for
there whole lives
believed in a Frecdoms we were taught
we had. The Defendants have violated
that trust and that freedom of
Janice.
400. That the Defendant lawyers believe

they can file anything they want and thc Judge's
to protect them and the
Criminal acts ofall involved will
rule as the Lawyers who put them
in position ofbeing a Judge owe.
401. Such acts, though possibly immun
e from civil suit, constitute "monstrous"
felony criminal violations of
Janice's rights relating to SEARCH
AND SEIZURE, PROCEDURAL
and SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS,
and CRUEL AND/OR UNUSUAL
PUNISHMENT.
414. On information and belief, Defend
ants collaborated, agreed, affilialed,
and conspired, City Attorney and
Defendants on Janice's Jailing ASSA
ULT COORDINATORS, and othcr
ENTERPRISE PERSONS, including
other Judges that are party to the
Old Boys Network in Virginia .
445.18 U.S.C. § 242 provides:
Whoever, under color ofany law, statute,
ordinance, regulation, or custom,
14
willfully subjects any person in any State,
Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or
District to the deprivation
o f any rights, privileges, or immunities secure
d or protected by tile Constitution or laws
of the United States, or
to different punishments, pains, or penalt
ies, on account ofsuch person being an
alien, or by reason ofhis color,
or race, than are prescribed for the punish
ment ofcitizens, shall be fined under this
title or imprisoned not more
than one year, or both; and if bodily injury
results from the acts committed in violation
of this section or if such
acts include the use, attempted use, or threate
ned use ofa dangerous weapon, explosives,
or fire, shall be fined
under this title or imprisoned not
more than ten years, or both.
446. The Criminal Activities to Cover up
the Truth the numerous acts of punishment
and prosecution of
protected speech along with the perjur
y and subornation ofperjury constitute
deprivations of Janice's rights
secured under the First, Fourth, Fifth,
Eighth, and Fourteenth Amendments
to the United States Constitution and
related provisions ofthe Constitution ofthe
State of Virginia. Whether shielded from
civil accountability or
otherwise, the felonies represent a deplor
able pattern of contempt of law. They are
also RICO predicate crimes
under 18 U . S . C . § 1961 ( 1 )( A ) and
( B ), as detailed below .
447. On information and belief, defend
ants sought to impose these deprivations
knowing such to be criminal
violations of Janice's constitutional rights
ín order to punish, rctaliatc, obstruct justic
e, and CHILL Janice from
further criticism of the Judiciary, thc
Government and Elected Officials and
all other Defendants herein, and to
intimjdate, harass, and oppress Janice from
pursuing the CLAIM AND DEMAND,
this Action, the DUE
ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE,
and PUBLIC BENEFIT ACTIVITIE
S.
448. That Judge Clark for the Love that
Judge Haddock etalhasfor Ilona usedj
ailasaconduítand
device to impose fear, retaliation, intimi
dation, duress, undue influence to try and
impede Janice bringing this
Action, and further deprive her of rights
privileges and immunities secured under
the Constitutions ofthe United State
s and the State of Virginia.
452. Janice is and was and in fact remai
ns intimidated, oppressed, fearful, and
under duress from all defendants
illegal activity.
453. Janice was imprisoned by Judge

Clark for the other favor of the other defen
dant, who knew or should have
known of the malicious and retaliatory
nature ofthe prosecution until releas
e on November 12 , 2014 . Such
constitutes a false imprisonment for
22 full days (FALSE IMPRISONMEN
T).
454 Janice was imprisoned on October
22,2014 with only DÍMuro lawyers stating
she had a home with a value of
$700,000. Which they wcrc aware
no equity existed possibly and the home
was in foreclosure .
456. That due to the Gang like activi
ty the Blogs they the Defendants had
killed any hopes oflanice getting a job.
That the malicious behavior by the
Judiciary et al is to cover up the crimi
nal acts and actions ofthemselvcs and
friends, the other defendants. there
466. As an intended or a reasonably
foreseeable result of these actions of
Defendants, Janice has been reasonably
fearful, intimidated, frightened, decei
ved, and thereby under duress and undue
influence to exercise his rights to
bring this Action sufficient to equit
ably extend or toll the running of any
stalute oflimitations 011 all Claims
Najor, 15 Cal. App. 4th 1351,1356 . Aweq v.
,19 Cal. Rptr. 2d 320,323 (1993);
Lauter v. Anoq/j-ieva, 642 F. Supp.
1101 (C.D. Cal. 2009) 2d 1060,
467. The events in this Section shall
collectively be referred to as
the MALICIOUS PROSECUTION.
DEFENDANTS ' role in them shall Thc
bc rcfcrrcd to as the PROSECUTO
RIAL MISCONDUCT .
Claim 3.1 468. This is a Claim by Janice again

st Defendants and it's unknown Claim
42 U.S.C. § 1983 s representative, for deprivation
under color of law pursuant to 42 of rights
U. S.C. § 1983 for its response to
thc CLAIM AND DEMAND, and
CITY ATI'ORNEY DEFENDANT its role in the
S' and Janice's COORDINATORS'
rcsponsc to thc CLAIM AND DEM
foreseeably leading to the MAL AND,
ICIOUS PROSECUTION, PRO
SECUTORIAL MISCONDUCT
IMPRISONMENTS. , and FALS E
rc-alleged und incorporated
as ifset forth in full.
470. At all times herein mentioned
, VA Judges and Federal Judges,
Commonwealth Attorney was
agent or employee of USA, acting as an
VA or COA and on informati
on and belief each Janice ASS
COORDINATOR in all acts AULT
relating to the CLAIM AND
DEMAND. In such capacity,
under color of law. VA, COA acted

f, in responding to thc CLAIM
AND DEMAND, VA, COA
Janice's ASSAULT COORDI collaborated with
NATORS and CITY ATTORN
EY DEFENDANTS in the MAL
PROSECUTION, and FALSE ICIOUS
IMPRISONMENTS by providing
or gencrating false or misleading
inforinarion,
15
testimony, documents and other evidence to other Defenda
nts, precipitating acts in the
MALICIOUS PROSECUTION, and foreseeably causing the FALSE
IMPRISONMENTS und other subsequent
events.
472. In committing the acts as described in this Count 2, VA, COA
and Defendants UNREASONABLY
breached one or more PROFESSIONAL DUTIES, including the duty ofgood
faith and fair dealing available to
Claimant beneficiaries ofproperty and liability insurance policies written
in Virginia, causing foreseeable
constitutional deprivation to Janice in violation of Janice's rights
to SUBSTANT]VE DUE PROCESS, and
extreme mental distress.
473. In performing the actions in this Count 2, Defendants subjected

Janice or caused her to be subjected to the
PROSECUTORIAL MISCONDUCT, FALSE IMPRIS
ONMENTS, and MALICIOUS PROSECUTION,
constituting a deprivation ofriglits, privileges, und immuní
tics relating to SEARCH AND SEIZURE,
SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS; PROCEDURAL DUE
PROCESS; EXPRESSION, PRIVACY, and
ASSOCIATION; ACCESS TO JUSTICE; EXCESSIVE
FORCE; and CRUEL AND/OR UNUSUSAL
PUNISHMENT,
474. As an actual and foreseeable result, Janice has been deprived,
damage, and injured in a nature and amount
to be proven at trial.
Claim 3.5 498. This a Claim by Janice against all DEFENDANTS for
deprivation of rights under color of law piìrsuant to
42 U.S.C. § 1983 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for all nonimmune acts ofthe MALICO
Chilling US PROSEUCITON, PROSECUTORIAL
MISCONDUCT, and CLAIM AND DEMAND, iii violation
of PLAINTIFS' rights, privileges and immu,i ities.
499. Al! prior paragraphs are re-alleged and incorpo
rated as if set forth in full.
500. Each Defendant to this Claim was aware of the Criminal
acts of Divorce Lawyer Ilona Grenadier Heckman
and had an obligation to speak up, That Janice's PUBLIC
BENEFIT ACTIVITIES, and ENGAGEMENT
before each event in the MALICIOUS PROSECUTION
and PROSECUTORIAL MISCONDUCT.
501. Defendants disfavored these Plaintiffs' PUBLIC BENEFI
T ACTIVITIES; Plaintiffs' "JUDGES
BEHAVING BADLY" MESSAGE, the DUE ADMIN
ISTRATION OF JUSTICE, and Plaintiffs' ongoing.
502. Defendants' organized, committed, and participa
ted in the Janice Jailing ASSAULT, MALICIOUS
PROSECUTION, and response to the CLAIM AND
DEMAND to deprive, intíinidate, thwurl, dtid retaliale
fbi
the sarne.
503. Plaintiff and others at or aware ofthe MALIC
IOUS PROSECUTION, PROSECUTORIAL
MISCONDUCT were frightened, intimidated, demoral
ized, and emotionally traumatizcd by Defendants'
activities,
504 . By thc MALICIOUS PROSECUTION , and
PROSECUTORIAL MISCONDUCT , Defendants
CHILLED
Plaintiffs and their affiliates from further PUBLI
C BENEFIT ACTIVITIES and other rights of
SPEECH,
ASSOCIATION, ACCESS TO IUST1CE, and
SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS.
505. As an actual and foreseeable result, Janice
and affiliates havc since bccn ddcrred, intimidated,
deprived,
or abandoned further PUBLIC BENEFIT ACTIV
ITY, DUE ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE, dissenib
led,
disassociated , and avoided interactions
with one another , causing Plaintiffs lost
business opportunities and
revenue.
507. In performing the actions described in
this Count and the MALICIOUS PROSECUTIO
N and
PROSECUTORIAL MISCONDUCT, the
Janice ASSAULT COORDINATORS and
each ofthem, in
CULPABLE and UNREASONABLE breach
of one or more PROFESSIONAL DUTIE
S, have subjected Janice
and affiliates, or caused them to be subjected
to deprivation of theír rights, privileges, and ím:nun
ities relating to
SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS; EXPR
ESSION, PRIVACY, and ASSOCIATION;
and ACCESS TO
JUSTICE.
508. As an actual and foreseeable result ofthe
acts ofeach Defendant to this Claim, Janice
and affiliates, have
been CHILLED, deprived, damaged,
and injured in their persons and prope
rty in a manner and amout}l to be
proven at trial.
16
COUNT 4 509. This is a Count against Defendants
for obstruction ofjustice relating to events
Obstruction of subsequent to the filing of
this Action, constituting deprivations
ofrights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Justice
510. That since on or around March of
1990 Janice can and will show with docum
42 U.S.C. § 1983 ents the Obstruction of Justice
by lawyers - Defendants that through each
law firm has a representative that has lied
in court, lied in court
documents, lied in documents to the
Supreme Court of Virginia.
511. That the Judge's have been in all case chosen
by Favoritism and Cronyism ic friend's of Defenda
nt ilona,
Erika or David to rule in there favor ignoring the
law in hopes that Plaintiff will commit suicide
or one oftheir
threats on her life will happen.
512, That Judge Haddock made it clear

all Judges' would be chosen by him to protect
Ilona from the Truth
being exposed for the "LOVE" he has
for her.
541. By virtue of the actions of Defend
ants, and each of them, detailed in the differe
nt Orders or documents that
they wem not going to allow the Truth
to be exposed of the corruption in the
Judiciary, the Government and with
the Elected Officials. De fcndants have
dcprivcd or caused deprivation to Janice
of rights
to SPEECH, PRIVACY, and ASSOCIATI
ON; SEARCH AND SEIZURE; ACCE
SS TO JUSTICE; and
SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS, causing
deprivation, damage, and injury in a nature
and amount to be
determined at trial.
COUNT 5 551 . This is a Count against Defendants

, for their ultra vires acts under color of law
Obstruction of constituting deprivations of
rights privileges and immunities under 42
U.S.C. § 1983. Defendants' acts anc! failure
Justice, s include creating and
maintaining illegal policies, rules, ünd
Deprivation of customs, causing and permitting a cultur
e of dclibcralc indiffcrence,
failure to train, breach of PROFESSIONAL
Rights Under Color DUTIES, and failure to act in a special
relationship, foreseeably
of Law causing constitutional deprivation as elsewh
ere alleged.
42 U.S.C. § 1983 552. Defendant VA Commission on Judicial
Performance, at times authorized to perform certain
activities
under the Commission, except in such times
as he was acting ult }·a vires, beyond the scope
ofauthority in his
office, in CULPABLE and UNREASONABLE
breach of one or more PROFESSIONAL DUTIE
S, in criminal
and civil conspiracy, or in violation of Plainti
ffs' rights under the Constitution ofthc State
of Virginia.
554. Thc VSB In performing all acts attribu
ted to them in this Count, have ignored the
criminal acts ofthe
lawyers by all appearance for the fundi
ng thcy receive from them . The VS
B were bound under thc following
PROFESSIONAL DUTIES: CONSTITUT
IONAL (non-discretionary), SUPERVISO
RIAL, FIDUCIARY,
SPECIAL RELATIONSHIP, CREATION
OF DANGER, SOCIAL WORKER and REAS
ONABLE CARE.
Said duties include duties to assure others
within their power and control abide by
their duties
555 . The VSB , FBI , DOJ and thc JIRC authori
zed activities include investigating Plaintiff
Janice ' s complaints
to the Commission on Judicial Performance
were ignored and she was told to not send
any other complaints as
they would be returned as these were.
557. VA, USA and COA funczio[led at
a!1 times under color of law and only in
an admínistrative capacity. At no
relevant time has either functioned
to protect Janice
Claim 5.1 558. This is a Claim for deprivation ofrigh
Illegal Line- ts under color oflaw for USA, VA and
VSB unauthorized
rulemaking to permit illegal judicial condu
Drawing ct, causing foreseeable constitutional injury
to Plaintiffs as clsewhcrc
alleged.
42 U.S.C. § 1983
eged and incorporated as if sct forth
in full.
Judge's "Line 560 . USA , VA and VSB
duties and responsibilities include " overs
Drawing" Duties ight , supervision , training , supervision
discipline over judges of Virginia , and
and Federal courts and the justices
o f thc Court of Appeal and Supreme
Court.' Their duties and responsibi
lities also include the power and duty
to discipline, control, or influence
"former judges for conduct prior
to retirement or resignation." They
also "share authority with the super
courts for the oversight of cour ior
t commissioners and referees."
561. That the USA, VA and COA
"authority is limited to investigati
ng allegations ofjudicial misconduc
warranted, imposing discipline t and, if
. "" Judicial misconduct usual
ly involves conduct in conflict with
forth in the Code of Judicial Ethic the stand ards set
s. After investigation and in some
cases a public hearing, the comm
impose sanctions ranging from ission may
confidential discipline to remo
val from office."
562. Under such authority, the FBI,
the Commonwealth Attorneys, the
OAG have a role in creation,
maintenance, and enforcem
ent of rules governing the beha
vior of County judges, inclu
ding judicial omcer
17
Defendants herein.
563. That the different Agency's in thc USA, COA and VA have ignored
the criminal acts and threats on Janice
and her girls lives to protect one ofthere own. As such, these Defendant
s' rulemaking and enforcement
influence gives them the power, though not thc authority, to permit
unconstitutional conduct by refi'aining from
discipline of it, and to discipline judicial conduct which is not a violation
ofany law. Such power foreseeably
influences judicial behavior toward litigants, including Plaintiff
herein.
565. These "line-drawing" roles of COMMISSION employees are described
in detail in tile Judicial Cannons.
566. In addition to their PROFESSIONAL DUTIES, Defendants are
bound by special duties in the performance
oftheir job responsibilities in drawing lines. Those "line-drawing
duties" include the duty to draw and only
enforce lines which arc consistent thc mandates and restrictions
which govern the behavior of those whom they
have the power and ability to influence or control, including
all provisions ofthe
Construction of thc United States and the Constitution
ofthe State ofVirginia.
567. Any CULPABLE or UNREASONABLE failure to draw lines consistent
with thc laws that govern judicial
behavior constitutes a violation of Defendants PROFESSIONAL
DUTIES. Such breaches causing reasonably
foreseeable injury constitutes a deprivation of SUBSTANTIVE
DUE PROCESS, and perhaps other
deprivations, to the person or entity injured.
568. Relevant to this litigation, the laws under which the Defendan
ts and others exercise line-drawing control
include those identified in the Constitution ofthc United States, thc Constitutio
n of the State o f Virginia, the
Virginia Code of Judicial Ethics, Civil Rights Criminal and Civil Statutes,
as well as those laws and rules
identified as JUDICAL PROFESSIONAL DUTIES, CONSTITUTIONAL
PROFESSIONAL DUTIES, and
oaths of office ofjudicial offi cers.
569. Pursuant to their own PROFESSIONAL DUTIES under the
Constitution ofthe State of Virginia
Defendants have no discretion to draw lines inconsistent with
these laws, rules, codes, oaths, and cannons
governing judicial officials.
570. By their power and ability to draw lines, Defendants and other
Commission employees exercise significant
control over behavior of Judges in Virginia jurisdictions. Because
many acts o fjudges are uniquely immunized
or insulated from ordinary civil accountability, Defendants, and other Commissio
n employees represent the only
true influence to cnforce-or fail to enforce-laws and duties governing
judicial behavior.
571. Civil rights immunity is not a defense to discipline by
the Commission or its employees.
573. Defendants failure to draw lines faithful to laws and thc
PROFESSIONAL DUTIES derived therefrom
effectively abrogates those laws and judicial offer PROFE
SSIONAL DUTIES thereundcr, as no other effective
means for enforcing such duties exists.
574. Defendants have no discretion 10 abrogate the Constitution of the United
States or the State of Virginia, or
any other law, rule, or legislation.
576. On information and belief, Defendants have participa
ted in line drawing in such a way as to effectively and
illegally abrogate many laws imposing CONSTITUIONAL and
JUDICIAL DUTIES on County judicial officers
in Virginia jurisdictions, thcrcby giving express and
implied permission to violate those laws.
577 . In so doing, Defendants have caused or contribute
d to conditions in which judicial officers are unrestrained
by the laws, duties, and responsibilities oftheir offices and constituti
onal restrictions on their acts.
578 . Such conditions have foreseeably lead to a culture
ofdeliberate indiffcrcncc which precipitated the illegal
acts ofthe judicial officers as described in the Janice Jailing,
MALICIOUS PROSECUTION, OBSTRUCITON
OF JUSTICE, RACKETEERING, and elsewhere
throughout this Complaint.
579. As an actual and foreseeable result o f Defend
ants' line-drawing to abrogate CONSTITUIONAL
and
JUDICIAL DUTIES governing judicial officer defenda
nts herein, Janice has been deprived and injured as
elsewhere alleged of rights, privileges, and immuni
ties relating to SEARCH AND SEIZURE; SUBST
ANTIVE
DUE PROCESS; PROCEDURAL DUE PROCE
SS; ACCESS TO JUSTICE; EXPRESSION,
PRIVACY, and
ASSOCIATION; and EXCESSIVE FORC
E; and CRUEL AND/OR UNUSUSAL
PUNISH:MENT.
has been dcprived, damage, and injured iii u
nature and amount
Claim 5.2 581. This is a Claim for deprivation ofrights
under color oflaw for Defendants facilitation
Obstruction of and toleration of
illegal obstruction ofjustice creating a widesp
Justice read culture ofdeliberate indifference causin
g foreseeable
obstruction ofjustice and retaliation, consti
Failure to tuting constitutional injury to PLAINITF
FS as elsewhere alleged.
582. All prior paragraphs arc re-alleged
and incorporated as if set forth in full.
18
Discipline Judicial 583 . The power and duty to disciplincjudges inçludes thc duty to protect thc process
and rights of citizens for
Defendants
doing so. Causing or allowing interference with such processes or afterward in retaliation constitutes a
42 U.S.C. § 1983
CULPABLE and UNREASONABLE breach of Defendants PROFESSIONAL DUTIES.
foreseeably resulting in
constitutional deprivations ofthc complaining citizens and others thereby subject to retaliation
or chilled out of
fear ofsame.
584. Such deprivations of rights of citizens to utilize the complaint process relate to rights, privileges
and
immunitics to EXPRESSION, PRIVACY, and ASSOCIATION; ACCESS TO JUSTICE;
and SUBSTANTIVE
DUE PROCESS, Such interference shall hereafter bc referred to as "OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE,"
585. Elected Officials, Commission on Judicial Performance employees are uniquely

empowered and therefore
bound to protect California litigants' rights under state and federal law to
petition the Commission and its
employees for grievances against such officers; speak freely about judicial officers
and their misconduct both
within and outsidc ofthc Commission's processes; seek and obtain unfettered, unimpeded,
and safe access to
such processes; maintain privacy in relation to commission matters and investigations;
and preserve procedural
and substantive due process rights through their management ofcomplaints, discipline,
and protection of
witnesses and parties to that process.
586. The failure to enact, maintain, policies and practices which assure the integrity
ofthe complaint process
foreseeably leads to opportunity and actual retribution by judges who, attune
to De fendants and others'
impotence to protect their witnesses, creates an environment ofdeliberat
e indifference and inadequate protection
ofwitnesses in the judicial oversight process. As a result, judicial officers
have rcceivcd a "green light" to
rctaliate against complaining litigants in manners similar to those
alleged hcrcin.
587. Defendants are aware that judicial officials are keenly sensitive to public
criticism, including complaints by
citizens . Professional Judges at 1278 - 79 . They
are also aware that City / County judges have substantial , often
unfettered, discretion to abusc legal process and obstruct justice to
retaliate with immunity against citizens who
make complaints against a City / County judge should the complaint
be revealed to the judge . Landmark
Commc 'ns, Inc . v. Virginia , 435 U . S . 829 , 835 ( 1978
); Supreme Court of Virginia v. Consumers Union of U. S.,
Inc,, 446 U. S. 719 (1980)
588. On information and belief, Defendants are aware of numerous

prior incidents of OBSTRUCTION OF
JUSTICE by judicial officers within their power and duty to control,
including each judicial omeer herein, some
of which are similar to the acts ofthc Janice Jailing COORDIN
ATORS.
589. On information and beliet Defendants, and others maintain
policies, practices, habits and customs
permitting the ability ofjudges to retaliate successfully, thereby
inhibiting, and impcding exercise of litigants,
including PLAINITFFS,' rights. Such policies consist, inter
alia, of (1) inadequate investigation of original
complaints brought by litigants who are dramatically disfavore
d in the proportion o f investigations undertaken
and ignored by Defendants and others and (2) Inadequat
e discipline for interference and retaliation, and (3)
inadequate and assurances and protections to litigants during
the complaint process to assure complaints are
properly treated, including advising litigants ofthe availabilit
y ofthe available means to protect them and
discipline judicial officers who retaliate.
590. Defendants are further aware that litigants
face unequal risks í'or retaìiation due to unecllial
discipline fu,·
litigant complaints in comparison with complaints by governme
nt lawyers. Published Commission statistics
show that as little as 2% ofall complaints by litižants are
acted upon, meaniníz that litigants who make such
comD]aints remain at jeopardy within the iurisdictio
n ofthe iudicial official and/or his colleagues, and therefore
subject to retribution. By contrast, approximately
50% ofcomplaints by government prosecutors
or other judges
themselves are acted upon.
591. Such inequality inflicts a deprivation of state

and federal Constitutional rights to Equal Protectio
n on
litigants, including Plaintiffs herein.
592. Defendants arc also aware that City / County

judges regularly icfuse to rccuse themselves
in cases iii
which they have obvious conflicts of interest,
including conflicts due to complaints filed by
litigants appearing
before them.
593. Under De fcndants habituated toleran

çe for judicial misconduct, disregard o f
ethical canons and
constitutional restrictions on abuse of authori
ty, the mere act of identifying a litigant ín
an investigation subjects
her zojeopardy by officer complained
ofor the o fficcr's colleagues acting in
lockstep sympathy.
594. That failure, combined with Defend
ants impotence to swiftly punish the same
in deterrence, makes the act
ofcntrusting a complaint to Defendants
at outrageous risk o f constitutional injury
by county judicial o fficers
]9
behaving as a steerage - fare gallery of feckless petit - ty
ran, pervcrsely immunized under the honor
ofpatriots to
indulge frolic, whimsy, and caprice, What shame a professi
on of reason today endures.
595. Defendants, by virtue oftheir awareness of the ongoing
DUE ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE and
ENGAGEMENTS, had a duty to protect Plaintiffs in
COMPLAINTS and DUE ADMINISTRATION OF
JUSTICE-either by effectively protecting Plaintiffs' and their
members' identity, or, ifnot possible, by
otherwise assuring that retribution against such citizens is met
with swift dctcrring discipline.
599. Such acts have caused Janice fear and distress, causing her to
refrain from subjecting herself to further
illegal retribution in accessing courts - but, on the other hand Defendan
ts have tortured her so she has no other
choice especially with there newest suite to make her homeless
for illegal ill-gotten legal fees she was jailed for.
600. The USA, VA and COA acts and failures to act have also
foreseeably led to the Jailing of Janice,
MALICIOUS PROSECUTION, PROSECUTORIAL MISCON
DUCT, OBSTRUC]TON OF JUSTICE, and
RACKETEERING,
601. Defendants failures in responding to the history of
complaints against judicial defendants herein, includin
g
have thereby deprived Janice ofrights, privileges and
immunitíes relating to EXPRESSION, PRIVACY, and
ASSOCIATION; ACCESS TO JUSTICE; and SUBSTA
NTIVE DUE PROCESS as elsewhere allegcd,
602. As an actual and foreseeable result, PLAINITFFS have
bcen deprived, damage, and injured in a nature and
amount to be proven at trial,
Claim 5.3 613. This is a Claim against Defendantš for depnvat

ion of rights under color o f law b:sed upon the
42 U.S.C. §1983 sallie facts
alleged against them under racketeering
Claims for Relief
614. Plaintiffrc-alleges and incorporates
by reference RICO Counts for Relief.
615. In performing each acts attribuled to them
in Racketeering Counts, Defendants have
CULPABLY and
UNREASONABLY breached one or more PROFES
SIONAL DUTIES, forcsceably dcpriving Janice
ofrights
relating to SEARCH AND SEIZURE; SUBST
ANTIVE DUE PROCESSI PROCEDURA
L DUE PROCESS;
EXPRESSION, PRIVACY, and ASSOCIATION
; EXCESSIVE FORCE; and CRUEL AND/O
R UNUSUSAL
PUNISHMENT.
616. As an act:ual and foreseeable result, Plaintiff

s have been deprived, damaged, and injured iii
a nature and
amount to be proven at trial.
Claim 5.4 626. This is Claim against Defendants for
deprivation of rights under color of law pursuan
Deprivation of t to 42 U.S.C. § 1983
for implementing, maintaining, and enforci
ng policies and practices iii violation of PLAIN
Equal Protection TIFS' rights,
privileges and immunities to EQUAL
42 U.S.C. § 1983 PROTECTION, causing foreseeable injury
to Plaintiffs as elsewhere
alleged.
627. All prior paragraphs are rc-alleged and

incorporated as i f set forth in full.
628. On information and belief, Defendants
rule-making responsibilities include power
and influence to
discriminate on thc basis o f categories or
classes o f, litigants, Claims, or judicial
officials.
629. On information and belief, Defend
ants create and maintain policies, rules,
and practices discriminating
against each ofthc EQUAL PROTECTION
CLASSES, and giving special exceptions
(o family court Judges
with jurisdiction over litigants within the EQUAL
PROTECTION CLASSES.
630. On information and belief, this unequa
l treatment is motivated by invidious discnm
ination against the
EQUAL PROTECTION CLASSES.
631. On information and belief. this unequa

l treatments results in complaints from
litigants within the EQUAL
PROTECTION CLASSES being prejudi
cially adjudged as less credible, viable,
or important. Such judgments
are based on invidious prejudices that
family court litigants are "litigants behavi
ng badly," a "bunch of
borderlines, " 64 angry about everyth
ing" lack credibility, importance, or legitim
acy, or otherwise inferior or
unequa! to other litigants. See Exs.
1,2; EQUAL PROTECTION CLAS
SES infra.
632. For similar reasons, litigant
complaints against Family Court
judges are treated differently becau
se ofwhat
has been described as a "Domestic
Relations Exception" to the Const
itution ofthc United States and
Constitution ofthe State of Virgin
ia.
633. Despite such error, Defendants,
along with other present Defendants,
abide the misconception in their
practices, effectively discriminat
ing against complaints alleging
constitutional deprivations by judge
by word or deed as if court litigan s, behaving
ts have fewer constitutional rights
to offend.
634. Such a policy and practice
constitutes deprivation of PLAJNITF
FS' rights, privileges, and immu
relating ro EQUAL PROTECTI nities
ON, and has inflicted foreseeable
injury to Plaintiffs as members
ofeach
20
EQUAL PROTECTION CLASS as elsewh
ere described.
635. As an actual and foreseeable result ofthe
acts and omissions of Defendants described hereinab
ove,
Plaintiffs have been deprived, damages, and injured as
elsewhere alleged in a nature and amount to be proven
at
trial,
COUNT 6 636. This is a Count containing Claims against
Defendants who maintain supervisory power and
Supervisory responsibility
over other Defendants (SUPERVISING DEFEN
DANTS). The Claims of this Count allege
Liability injury under 42
U.S.C. § 1983 caused by breach of those duties foreseeab
42 U.S.C. § 1983 ly causing deprivation of rights, damage, and injury.
637. Each SUPERVISING DEFENDANT at
all times was under the following SUPERVISORY
DUTIES:
A. Policy and Rulemaking '.
Powers and duties to create, modify, and maintain
policies , rules , and restrictions to
govern subordinates in compliance with
alllaws and each SUPERVISING DEFEN
DANT's and each oftheir
subordinate's PROFESSIONAL DUTIE
S.
b. Train: Duties to prepare subordinatcs
for foreseeable risks of causing constit
utional deprivation which the
subordinate could not be expected to anticipa
te, and duties to continue and update such training
to accommodate
known errors and changes in laws and
circumstances;
c. Oversight: Powers and duties to
oversee , communicate and interact with
, direct , train , and guide subordinates
to assure their acts are in accordance with law
and each subordinate's PROFESSIONAL DUTIES
.
d. Enforcement: Each SUPERVISING
DEFENDANT had duties to enforce policie
s , and all laws and
restrictions relating to their subordinate's
PROFESSIONAL DUTIES through discipli
ne and ifnecessary
termination.
638. Each supervisor further was at all
times bound under the following PROF
ESSIONAL DUTIES:
CONSTITUTIONAL, SOCIAL WORK
ER, FIDUCIARY, and at certain times
elsewhere alleged,
CONTRACTUAL.
639. On information and belief, each

SUPERVISING DEFENDANT knew
or should have known of:
Prior disregard of PROFESSIONAL DUTIE
S and laws, and deprivation ofrights by
their subordinates
named herein; The breaches of PROF
ESSIONAL DUTIES and laws and depriv
ation ofrights among
their subordinates as alleged herein ;
Plaintiffs ' DUE ADMINISTRATION
OF JUSTICE , CLAIM
AND DEMAND, MALICIOUS PROSECUTIO
N, PROSECUTORIAL MISCONDUCT, and
NESTHUS OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTIC
E; Each Scheme and Artifice to Defraud,
ENTERPRISE, and
CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY alleged
under the RICO ALLEGATIONS infra.
640. On information and belief, each
SUPERVISINO DEFENDANT had
further specific knowledge of prior
acts by their subordinates, supervisors
and/or trainees causing constitutional
injury similar lo that complained o t
by Plainti ffs.
641 . Knowing of these facts , each SUPE

RVISING DEFENDANT had a duty to investisulc ,
remedy , correct ,
discipline, re-train, and/or terminate those
over whom they had the power to influen
ce or control to conform thc
behavior of those they supervised
to law.
642. In CULPABLE and UNREASON
ABLE breach of one or more SUPERVISOR
Y DUTIES, each
SUPERVISING DEFENDANT implem
ented çustoms , policies , or practices that
created unreasonable risks that
subordinates would perpetrate the constit
utional injuries elsewhere complained
of by Plaintiffs, including:
Directing, rewarding, encouraging, or
acting with deliberate indi fference to
the actions ofsubordinatcs which led
to Plaintiff's constitutional injurie
s; Failing to change the customs, practic
es, or policies, or employ corrective
practices for subordinates, after having
knowledge of actual or threatened
constitutional injury; and Facilitating,
acquiescing to, endorsing, or ratifyi
ng HARRASMENT AND ABUS
E.
643 . Each SUPERVISING DEFE
NDANT UNREASONABLY and CULP
ABLY failcl! IO implement remedial
measures to prevent further const
itutional injuries to Plaintiffs and
those similarly situated.
Claim 6.1 644 . This is a Claim for failure to super

vise against the heads ofthe VA , VSB
Supervisor COA who had official believed at
times relevant to this Action, for
Liability failure to oversee subordinates as
alleged below.
645. A!1 prior paragraphs arc rc-all
Against the City of eged and incorporated as if set forth
in full.
Alexandria, VA, 646. That at all times someone thc
Clerk of Court or other Superviso
r type's were aware ofthe Criminal
VSB, USA taking place and ignoring the acts Acts
of Defendants provides services
as elsewhere alleged, including the
criminal ENTERPRISES.
42 U.S.C. § 1983 647. On information and belief, Defen
dants UNREASONABLY failcd to
perform one or more SUPERVISORY
DUTY over his or her subordina
tes, foreseeably causing or perm
itting the subordinate's acts as elsew
here
21
alleged in Janice's Jailing, CLAIM AND DEMAND, and RACKETEERING, causing deprivation
of rights of
SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS.
648 . By virtue ofthe CULPABLE and UNEASONABLE beaches of PROFESSIONAL DUTIES by each
subordinate as elsewhere alleged, each SUPERVISING DEFENDANT has breached one or more SUPERVISORY
DUTIES, directly and indirectly depriving Plaintiffs of rights as elsewhere alleged, causing injury in a nature and
amount to bc proven at trial
COUNT 7 713. This is a Count containing Claims Defendants of Municipal Liability, VA Courts Liability,
USA Federal
42 U.S.C. 1983 Courts Liability, Judicial Council Liability, ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE COURTS, City
of
Municipal
Alexandria, Prince William County for deprivation of rights under color of law against ''beneath
Liability, VA
State-level" entities under 42 U.S.C. §1983 .
Courts Liability,
714. Defendants to this Count are "governments beneath the state level" within the definition
USA Federal ofthat term in
Courts Liability, Board offomm'rs v, Brown, 520 U,S, 397 (1997),
Judicial Council 715. Each municipal entity herein was at all times bound under the following PROFESSIONAL
DUTIES:
Liability, CONSTITUTIONAL, SUPERVISORY, MUNICIPAL, SOCIAL WORKER, FIDUCIARY,
and at times
ADMINISTRATIV elsewhere alleged, CONTRACTUAL,
E OFFICE OF
716, Each Defendant created, maintained, and enforced maintained policies, customs,
THE COURTS, rules, procedures,
traditions, practices, including "line-drawing" activities as elsewhere detailed ("policies")
City o f Alexandria, and permitted and
Prince William directed behaviors by policymakers themselves, causing or permitting deliberate
indifference and a culture o f
County deliberate indifference to foreseeable constitutional injury ofthe type caused to
Plaintiff Janice and her in ability
to get a fair trial, a Judge with Jurisdiction, to protect Janice from criminal acts ofother.
in the DDIJO and
MALICIOUS, PROSECUTION, and PROSECUTORIAL MISCONDUCT, and OBSTRUCT
ION OF
JUSTICE.
717. Administrative Director of the Courts is accountable to the council and
the Chief Justice for the
performance ofthe Administrative Office of the Courts. The Administr
ative Director's authority is limited to
accomplishing the council's goals and priorities. A chart dcpicting
the relationship between the
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE COURTS, JUDICIAL COUNCIL
, and other related defendants. The
JUDICIAL COUNCIL or its employees have no authority to perform any
"judicial act" as that term is defined iii
Ashelman v. Pope. 793 F.2d 1072,1075 Øth Cir. 1986)
718. Said policies further permitted or were deliberately indifferent to the
conduct, participation in, operation,
monitoring, discipline, and control of each ENTERPRISE and ENTERPR
ISE PERSON in a slate wide affiliated
Enterprise operation that participated in Janice Jailing.
719. Each Defendant further failed to properly train its employees prior to
its employee's acts elsewhere alleged
to have caused constitutional deprivation, damage, and injury, foreseeab
ly resulting in thc injury alleged.
COUNT 8
Respondent 754. This is a Claim alleging respondent superior liability against
VSB and JIRC for the actions of their agents
Superior Liability and employees pursuant to common law Principles of responde
nt superior.
Claim 8.1 755. All prior paragraphs are re-alleged and incorporated
as i f set forth in full.
Against VSB 756. VSB Ìs an association to support, facilitate, and coordinate
the Virginia State
Lawyers /
[cgal industry. The responsibility of the diverse legal community,
the VSB aims to support and inform thc
States lawyers, but also the public and the community. Program
s help clients find qualified lawyers, resolve
disputes and educate Virginians is their claim , The
VSB has had the Ethics Guru send Janice ' s information of
criminal activity to his home instead ofto his office. That
the Bar is supported offthc Lawyers andi f you look
at the lawyers disciplined they are not usually
part ofthe Old Boys Network . Janice went she went
to them for
help was told to go away. We don't discipline our favorites
.
757. At all times relevant hereto, Defendant VSB was
the superior, employer, and principal ofmajority of
Defendants that COORDINATOR, , and each ENTER
PRISE PERSON and a conductor and participant
ín each
ENTERPRISE.
758. Each act attributable to each Janice Jailing
COORDINATOR, and each ENTERPRISE
PERSON and a
conductor and participant in each ENTERPRIS
E Defendant is attributable to VSB.
759. As an actual and foreseeable result of
the acts of each subordinate, agent, and emplo
yee Defendant, Plaintiffs
have been damaged and injured in a nature
and amount to be proven at trial.
COUNT 9 764. This is a Count for conspiracy to interfe
re with rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1985 against
COORDINATOR
22
Conspiracy to Defendants based on the Janice's Jailíng in Count 1,
based on the non-immune acts in the MALICIOUS
Interfere With PROSECUTION and PROSECUTORIAL MISCO
Rights NDUCT in Count 3, Defendants based on the
OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE in Count 4,
42 U.S.C. § 1985 Defendants on acts alleged in Count 5, their
supervisors ín Count 6,
and municipalities in Count 7 (çolleçtively
Against All COLOR OF LAW DEFENDANTS).
Defendants
Claim 9.1 765. This is a Claim by Janice against all COLO
R OF LAW DEFENDANTS as alleg:d in each
42 U.S.C. Claim of Counts
1,3-7, for Preventing Officer from Performing Duties
under 42 U.S.C. § 1985(1) against Janice ASSAULT
1985(1)
COORDINATOR Defendants based on the Jailing
of Janice in Count 1, based on the non-immune
acts in the
MALICIOUS PROSECUTION and PROSECUTO
Against All RIAL MISCONDUCT in Count 3, Defendants
based on the
COLOR OF LAW OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE in Count 4, on acts âlleged
in Count 5, and acts ofsupervisors and
DEFENDANTS municipalities in Counts 6 and 7.
766. All prior paragraphs arc re-alleged
and incorporated as ifset forth in full.
772. In committing the acts alleged in Counts 1
-5 above, COLOROF LAW DEFENDANTS and
each of thcln
conspired as detailed in each Count:
A.To prcvcnt, by force, intimidation, or threat,
Janice from accepting or holding a POSIT
ION UNDER THE
UNITED STATES; to prevent Janice from any
ancl all employment or mvestment opportunities
has been deprivcd of rights, privilege, and immun
ities as alleged in
Counts 1,3-7, damaged or injured in a nature
and amount to be proven at trial
Claim 9.2 774. This is a Claim by Janice for obstructingjus
tice; intimidating party, witness, orjuror under
42 U.S.C.
1985(2) against Janice COORDIN
ATOR
Conspiracy to
775. All prior paragraphs are re-alleged
Interfere with Civil and incorporated as ifset forth in full.
Rights 776. Defendants and each of them conspired
as detailed in each Count 1,3-7 above;
42 U.S.C. 1985(2) 777. Plaintiffis Catholic and has been harass
ed for religious beliefs by Defendants. Subjec
t to historic de facto
Against COLOR and de jure invidious discrimination in violati
on ofthe 5'h and 14th Amendment rights to
Equal Protection of
OF LAW the Laws (collectively "EQUAL PROT
ECTION CLASSES"):
DEFENDANTS 785. No Defendant acting under color of
law may legally act with discretion in lhe
absence ofjurisdiction
established by the Constitution of the State
of Virginia, United Statcs Constitution,
statutes, laws, contract, or
regulation.
786. Plaintiff membership in and advoc
acy for the EQUAL PROTECTION CLAS
SES was known to and
targeted by Defendants prior to
her jailing.
787. Defendants CULPABLY undertook
each ofthe acts ascríbed to them with the
intent to cause Janice Jailing
MALICIOUS PROSECUT]ON, PROSECUT
ORIAL MISCONDUCT, and OBSTRUCT
ION OF JUSTICE to
deprive Plainti ff, o f them, of equal protec
tions, privileges, and immunities, includ
ing rights related to their
PUBLIC BENEFIT ACTIVITIES, DUE
ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE, and
rights as advocates for and on
behalfofthe EQUAL PROTECTI
ON CLASSES.
788. In performing the acts alleged above
, COLOR OF LAW DEFENDANTS
conspired to deter, injure,
Plaintiff, by MALICIOUS PROSECUT
ION, PROSECUTOR]AL MISCONDU
CT, and OBSTRUCTION
OF JUSTICE, from attending or testifying
freely, fully, and truthfully as a party or witnes
s in Plaintiffs'
PUBLIC BENEFIT ACTIVITIES, or
from testifying to any matter, frccly,
fully, and truthfully; Plaintiff in their
property for lawfully enforcing, or
atiempting to enforce, the rights of Plaint
iff, and each ofthem, as members of
each EQUAL PROTECTION CLASS,
to the equal protection ofthe laws. Herei
nafter collectedly referred to as
the EQUAL PROTECTION CON
SPIRACY.
789. As an actual and foreseeable
result, Plaintiffs have been deprived
of rights, privileges and immunities
forth in Counts 1,3-7 as set
Claim 9.3 790. This is a Count for Depriving
persons of rights or privileges unde
Conspiracy to r 42 U.S.C.1985(3)(a) against Janic
Defendants based on the Jailing e,
in Count 1, DEFENDANTS based
Interfere with Civil on the non-immune acts in the
MALICIOUS PROSECUTION
Rights and PROSECUTORIAL MISCOND
UCT in Count 3, Defendants based
OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE on the
42 U.S.C. in Count 4, on acts alleged in Coun
t 5, and supervisor and municipal
1985(3)(a) Counts 6 and 7. entiti es in
(b)(c) 791. AH prior paragraphs are
re-alleged and incorporatcd as
ífsct forth in full.
792. In committing the acts alleg
ed against them in each of Coun
Against all ts 1,3-7, COLOR OF LAW DEF
CULPABLY acted in conspirac ENDANTS
COLOR OF LAW y for the purpose of depriving Plain
ti ffs individually as members ofan
advocates for the EQUAL PRO d
TECTON CLASSES, ofthe equa
l protection ofthe laws and equa
l privileges
23
DEFENDANTS and immunities under the laws, including but not limited to their PUBLIC BENEFIT ACTIVITIES
, the DUE
ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE, and retaliating for cxcrcise thereof, causing Plaintiffs reasonably
foreseeable and injury therefrom.
793. As an actual and foreseeable rcsult, Plaintiffs have been deprived ofrights, privileges and immunities,
damaged and injured in an amount according to proof at trial.
COUNT 10 802. This is a Count for Failure to Prevent or Aid in Preventing Deprivation of Constitutiona
l Rights under 42
Failure to Prevent U.S.C.§ 1986 against Janice.
or Aid in 803. On information and belief, Defendants to thís Count had knowledge ofall relevant
facts alleged in this
Preventing Complaint, including that the acts conspired to be done and committed as alleged in
Counts 1,3-7 were about to
Deprivation of be committed.
Constitutional 804. Defendants to this Count, and each of them, by virtue oftheir relationship
s with each other de fendant, their
Rights authority under law, and PROFESSIONAL DUTIES, had power to prevent or
aid in preventing the commission
42 U.S.C. § 1986 of the same.
Against COLOR 805 . Defendants to this Count , and each ofthcm , neglected or
refused to exercise their powers to prevent or aid
OF LAW
in preventing thc commission ofthc same.
DEFENDANTS
806. The acts as aileged herein were ín fact committed as alleged.
807. As an actual and foreseeable result, Plaintiffs have been deprived,
damaged, or
injured in a nature and amount to be proven at trial
COUNT 11 808. This is a Count alleging breach of contract, fraud, exto,lion, bribery
and abuse ofprocess centered on the
Ilona Grcnadier et actions of Defendants Grcnadier Law, Ilona, David and Erika acting under
color of law, and related deprivations
al TERRORISM
of rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Breach of
809. That the above Defendants conspired to steal from Janice from on
Covenant o f Good or around December of 1986,
Faith and Fair 810. That Ilona acted as Janice's lawyer to protect herself The documents
and letters will show this.
Dealing 811. That on the morning of July 7,2990 Lawyer Ilona would
lie to Janice as she was waiting results lo hear
42 U.S.C. § 1983 how " A" who had been born the night before with
arl cmcrgency C scction with heart issues how she was .
812. Lawyer Ilona manipulated a $30,000, Commission that Mays
& Valentine aka Troutman Sanders with her
collusion would further the manipulation in the days and
weeks to come .
815. These representations made were ifyou want your child ever
seeing her father out ofjail you had better do
this. In return you will get a nok due in 30 years with 10% interest.
Ilona has as a lawyer said the note would
be safer with her. Ilona a Lawyer refused to hand over
such note.
816. Ilona breached the contracts and representations by committi
ng extortion, abuse of process, and by failing
to abide by each ofthe above referenced promises, his PROFES
SIONAL DUT]ES, including dutjes of
disclosure, loyalty, honesty, and good faith, as well as breaching
one or more provision ofthe written contract.
817. Ilona exceeded his authority in filing false and misleadin
g documents with the courts and several other
agencies. Ilona has been allowed criminal behavior because
ofa perceived Power in tþ.e Old Boys Network of
Virginia.
818. Ilona Attempting to intimidate, distress, harm, defraud,
extort, and rob Janice; is a pattern and practice
along with her participation itt having Janice Jailed
. All lawyers and Judges were aware this was illegal and
did
it anyways to intimidate and torture a citizen in the United
States o f America, should worry everyone.
910 . That the attempts to stop Janice by Defendants accusing
her of Extortion was criminal in itself and was
made able by the Commonwealth Attorney ofthe COA,
the COA Police.
829 . Janice was also defrauded by Defendants
n a car they have stolen and sold with forged documenls alleged
in understanding the nature and extent of the
enterprise und conspiratorial rclationship5 betwee
n thc other
Defendants giving them a perceived Power.
830. As a result of such fraud, duress, undue iníluenc
e, breach of fiduciary und other PROFESSIOKAL
DUTIES,
Janice has been oppressed, deterred, and unwill
ingly delayed to initiate this Action until Augus
t 20,2013.
Claim 11.2 843. This is a Claim for fraud and negligent
misrepresentation by Janice against Defend
Fraud ants.
844. All prior paragraphs and all paragraphs
below regarding each RICO Count 1, below,
Against are re-alleged and
incorporated as ifset forth in full.
Defendants 845. At all relevant times, other Defendants
acted as an agent and representative for Ilona.
Ilona 846. Ilona's written and oral representation
s described above were intentional or neglige
nt, false when made,
material, and reasonably relied upon
Janice
847. As an actual and foreseeable result,
Janice has been injured in a nature and
amount to be proven at trial
24
Claim 11.3 848. This is a Claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress by Janice against
Ilona and her gangs
Intentional
849. All prior paragraphs are re-alleged and incorporated as ifset forth in full,
Inflictlon of
850. Ilona's TERRORISM detailed above and throitghout were CULPABLE, extreme and
Emotional Distress; outrageous,
malicious. fraudulent, and oppressive, reasonably and foreseeably causing Janice severe emotional
42 U.S.C. § distress.
1983; Against 851. Ilona was at all times acting as an agent, co-conspirator, collaborator, subordinate, and
employee of each
all Ilona other Ilona TERRORISM Defendant.
TERRORISM 852. In committing the acts described in this Complaint, Ilona, Grenadicr at
Law and her gang of other Defendants
Defendants and John Does, . foreseeably damaged, injured, and deprived Janice or
caused her to be deprived of rights. privileges.
and immunities relating to SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS; PROCED
URAL DUE PROCESS, SEARCH AND
SEIZURE; EXPRESSION, PRIVACY, and ASSOCIATION; ACCESS TO
JUSTICE, causing deprivation, damage,
and injury in a nature and amount to be proven at trial
Claim 11.4 873. This is a Claim against VA, COA and USA for supervisory failures
causing deprivation of Janice's rights
Failure to
under color of law pursuantto 42 U.S.C. 1983
Supervise
874. All prior paragraphs are re-alleged and incorporated as i f set
Defendants forth in full.
875. VA, COA and USA SUPERVISING DEFENDANTS, and each of them,
42 U.S.C. 1983 at all times had the power to
oversee, supervise, train, discipline Ilona and her gang. so as to prevent
and Cal. Const or aid in preventing the commission of
art. I, § 26 Ilona and other Defendants acts as alleged herein.
876. That VA, COA and USA had the administrative and supervising authority
to prevent Lhc Jailing of Janice.
878. VA, COA and USA are CULPABLY AND UNREASONABLY
permitted the Jailing of Janice so to
allow Defendants to commit the fraud, abuse of process, extortion
, and terror against Janice.
879. DEFENDANTS knew or should have known: Ilona's history
offraud, abuse, and illegal conduct described
herein; The pattern of illegal activities of the CONSPIRACIES
and CRIMINAL
ENTERPRISES herein ,; and The FEDERAL ENGAGEMENT
of Plaintiffs and others regarding Defendants ,
the ENTERPRISE and CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY operators
and affiliates.
880. After learning of Ilona's "S history of illegal conduct,
fraud, and abuse, liona's SUPERVISING
DEFENDANTS had a duty to investigate, ovcrscc, re-train,
discipline, and/or termìnate those over which they
had thc power to influence or control including Grenadi
er Law.
881. Supervising Defendants failed to implement remedial measures
such as reassignment, removal or other
disciplinary actions to prevent further constitutional injuries to Plaintiffs
and those similarly situated.
882. Having this knowledge, Ilona's SUPERVISING DEFEND
ANTS neglected or refused to prevent or aid in
preventing the same.
887. Despite the knowledge of past/prior acts causing or likely
to cause constitutional injury, Ilona's
SUPERVISING DEFENDANTS took no and/or inadequa
te corrective action, and in fact encouraged the acts
that caused or were likely to cause constitutional
injury.
888. In committing each act as described in this Count, Ilona
and other Defendants SUPERVISING
DEFENDANTS CULPABLY and UNREASONAB
LY breached one or more PROFESSIONAL DUTIES
,
depriving Janice or causing him to be deprived of
rights privileges and immuníties relating to SEARC
H AND
SEIZURE; SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS; EXPRES
SION, PRIVACY, and ASSOCIATION,
EXCESSIVE FORCE; and CRUEL AND/OR UNUSUSAL
PUNISHMENT, causing deprivation, injury, and
damage in a nature and amount to bc proven at
trial.
COUNT 12 889. This is a Count against each COLOR OF LAW
Defendant based on acts alleged against cach such
Deprivation of
Defendant in each Claim herein. This Count asserts that
each Defendant's UNREASONABLE and CULPABLE
SUBSTANTIVE acts under color of law in breach of a duty identifi
ed below constitute a deprivation ofsubstantive
DUE PROCESS due process
under both the Constitution of the United States
and the Constitution of the State o f Virginia to
all cntitics
foreseeably injured therefrom.
42 U.S.C. § 1983 890. At all times relevant to this Action, each
COLOR OF LAW Defendant and defendant acting
Against COLOR under color of
law owed one or more PROFESSIONAL DUTIE
S to each Plaintiffas follows: CONSTITUT
OF LAW IONAL: For any
Defendant acting under color of law, the
following non-discretionary duties: The duty
DEFENDANTS to exercise color of law
powers only in the presence of legal author
ity or jurisdiction provided under enabling
legislation, rules, charters,
or constitutions, pursuant to VA Const
.
The duty to protect, uphold, and defend
the laws and the Constitutions and laws
ofthc United States and the
State of Virginia;
The duty to act only in the public intere
st; provide only honest government servic
es;
25
The duty to avoid al! conflict, undue influence, bribery, self-dealing, bias,
nepotisin;
The duty to commit no reasonably foreseeable deprivation
o f clearly established civil rights;
The duty to create or inflict no harm unless specifically authorized
after due process oflaw. Pursuant to ofthe
Constitution of the Statc of Virginia, each Defendant's CON
STITUTIONAL duties for administrative, law
enforcement, judicial, quasi-judicial, and prosecutorial functions
identified in this Complaint are "mandatory"
and "prohibitory." As such, no entity, including
but not limited to defendants herein, acting
under color of Virginia state law may exercise discretion
to perform any act which violates any
CONSTUTIONAL DUTY, and no valid law of the State
of Virginia may empower an act under color of law
which violates any CONSTITUTIONAL
DUTY
FIDUCIARY: Duties oftrust and loyalty of treating

pecuniary interests of named or reasonably
foreseeable beneficiaries equal to own. Such duties apply
to certain functions of Defendants acting
under color of law;
JUDICIAL: Duties to ensure due process and protect rights

ofall ofthose within their jurisdiction; all
duties enumerated in Canons and related codes ofjudicial
ethics. Such DUTIES apply to all functions
of all judicial officers perfoming any administrative orjudicia
l function;
ATTORNEY / ADVOCATE : Duties ofprofessional
competence , loyalty , zealous advocacy and those
specifically articulated in the Model Code of Professional
Conduct. Such duties apply to al! function of
all attorneys and certain functions of social worker acting
as advocates or advisors
SOCIAL WORKER: Duties of professional competen
ce, act only in public interest;
SUPERVISORIAL: Duties to oversee, supervise,
train, instruct, guide, monitor, discipline, and
1 terminate subordinates; to exercise power to prevent
or aid in preventing breaches of others with power
to influence or control;
SPECIAL RELATIONSHIP : Duties to affirmatively

act in situations not otherwise requiring action
founded on the existence of a prior engagem
ent, bond, or other relationship;
CREATION OF DANGER: Duties to affirmatively
act in situations not otherwise requiring action
founded upon the actor's creating a danger or risk
to which the duty to act in preventing harm from the
risk arises;
CONTRACTUAL: Specific duties under contract; duty

ofgood faith and fair dealing;
MUNICIPAL: Duties ofall governments to enact
and enforce only constitutional rules, laws, policies,
customs, habits, behaviors or procedures; duty
to act to prevent foreseeable deprivation of
constitutional injury; duty to take action and/or
avoid deliberate ind Ì fference to actual or likely
constitutional injury within authority to act;
THERAPEUTIC: For all mental health professi

onals, duties to observe all professional standard
s
relevant to their respective professional licensure
, best practices, and specialty standards; Duty to
do no
harm. Such duties apply to Domestic Dispute
Industry Professional Service providers.
891. In performing each act alleged herein, each
Defendant bound at all relevant times by one
or more
PROFESSIONAL DUTY as elsewhere
specified.
892. Said PROFESSIONAL DUTIES undcr which
each Defendant to each Count herein ucted extended
at all
times to each Plaintiff named in each Count.
893. By virtue ofeach Defendant's PROFESSIONA

L DUTIES, PLAIINTIFFS at all relevant times
possessed
reciprocal rights to SUBSTANTIVE DUE
PROCESS in the performance of those
duties ofthc Constitution of
the State ofVirginia and the Fifth and Fourtee
nth Amendments to the United States Constit
ution.
894. For each entity acting under color of
Virginia state law, their breach of a PROFE
SSIONAL DUTY by
CULPABLE or UNREASONABLE
conduct as elsewhere alleged , setting
in motion foreseeable injury ,
constitutes a deprivation of SUBS
TANTIVE DUE PROCESS of those
injured.
895. As elsewhere alleged cach
Defendant brcachcd onc or more
ofsaid PROFESSIONAL DUTI
ES
UNREASONABLY or CULPABLY
, constituting a deprivation of SUBS
TANTIVE DUE PROCESS under
the Fifth
and Fourteenth Amendment to the
United States Constitution, causin
g damage and injury in a nature
and amount
according to proof at trial
COUNT 13 896. This is a Claim for trespa
ss under color oflaw for acts cause
Trespass Under d in coram no ,ì Judice by each Defend
elsewhere alleged. ant as
Color of Law
42 U.S.C. § eged and incorporated as ifset
forth in full.
898. Each Defendant acting under
color of state law is empowered
and restrained from acting by virtue
ofthe
26
1983 respective constitutions, charters, and articles ofincorporation, appointme
nts, or other entity fonnatlon
Against Each
documents describing the Defendant's jurisdiction. To tile extent the powers
are derived from the Constitution of
Defendant
the State of Virginia, such powers and restrictions are "mandatory" and
"prohibitory" (nondiscretionary) under
thc Virginia Constitution.
899. In causing injury as described in each Count and Claim herein, Dcfendants
acting under color oflaw, and
each ofthem, actcd in excess ofand in the complete absence o fjurisdictio
n, causing "offthe reservation" injury
in violation of Plaintiffs' rights, privileges, and immunit
ies.
900. In exceeding the limits of their authority as elsewhere alleged
in each Count and Claim herein, Defendants, and
each of them, committed a trespass to the property,
persons, rights, privileges, and immunities of Plaintiff
s, causing a
deprivation ofsame, and are therefore strictly liable for all injury
foreseeably resulting therefrom, including each
injury identified in eaçh Claim herein, ilz a nature and amount
COUNT 14 901. All prior paragraphs are re-alleged and incorporated as
if set forth in full,
Unjust Enrichment
902. In reliance on Count 14 Defendants' acts and omissions,
Plaintiff has been wrongfully induced to retain
Count 14 Defendants, and as a result has paid in excess
to Defendants to be had.
903. As an actual and foreseeable result of Defendant Defenda
nts' misfeasance and malfeasance described herein,
Defendants have been unjustly enriched in an amount paid
by Plaintiff the exact amount to be proven at trial.
COUNT 15 904. This is a Count for false description of services against each
Defendant as indicated under 15 U.S.C. §
False designation of
1125.
origin, false
905. All prior paragraphs are rc-alleged and incorpor
description ated as ifset forth in full.
906. Defendants, in connection with their business
es, professions, PROFESSIONAL DUTIES,
15 U.S.C. § CONSPIRACIES and ENTERPRISE OPERATIONS,
usc in their advertisements, promotions, sale and
offer for
1125 sale of their legal services words, terms, names,
symbols, and devices, and combinations thereof,
Against All (COMMERCIAL SPEECH) which are false and
misleading.
Defendants 907. In their COMMERCIAL SPEECH DEFEN
ANTS represent that their services abide by
ordinary and
professional standards ofcare, arc legal, efficien
t, safe, and effective exercise of governmental
powers and
public licenses provided under law as follows
per defendant:
Entity Misrepresentation / Reference
All Defendants Each Dcfendai : t ' s COMMERCIA
L SPEECH r : prescnts
that their public and private services arc legal,
safe, efficient, obedíent to PROFESSIONAL
DUTIES and
standards ofcare. JUDICIAL COUNCIL,
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE COURT
S,
910. The Claims ofall Defendants describ
ed in this Count and elsewhere arc false
and misleading.
911. With respect to each Defendant: a,
In their activities described herein, Defend
ants operate CRIMINAL
ENTERPRISES which defraud, abuse, oppress
, and deprive Plaintiffs and the general public
of their property
and liberty.
b. In their COMMERCIAL SPEECH promot

ion for such ENTERPRISES, including
websites, literature, public
appearances, statements and representation
s, Defendants misrepresent theirs and others'
legal and professional
services as legal, fair, honest, and benetì
cial, when in fact they urc fraudulont,
harmful, inefficient, opprcsäivc,
and illegal.
c . Further . in their advertising
and promotion De fendantg fail to wnrn
c „„„ iners of thc ill , 8 ° l , ty o f tl , cir
services, the constitutional deprivations
they cause and form the basis o f liability
for, and the many disastrous
pitfalls which occur regularly from use
ofsuch professional services. As such,
De fendants nìislead as to the
nature, characteristics, qualities, oftheir
and their ENTERPRISE affiliates' service
s, including the nature ofthe
ENTERPRISE with purpose..
d. Defendants mislead consumers by

misdirection from superior, legitimate,
legal services by one or more, and
by advising "that's how it is" in family
court, and by failing to advise ofthe
full options consumers have toward
legal, healthy, and safe alternatives
to avoid the abundant harm likely
to befal! those who engage m such
activities.
912. PlaintifTs compete with Defen

dants for provision of legal servic
es and as dctailcd in RICO ENTE
RPRISE
allegations below.
913. Plaintiffs, their clients, and

affiliates provide safe, legal, efficie
nt, and healthier competing profes
services in compliance with law. sional
Defendants, by virtue of their
illegal collusion, conspiracy, and
coordination
are competitively advantagcd
to overcharge for harmful, ineffi
cient, oppressive, and unhealthy
services. To
protect such inefficient, illegal,
and anticompetitive activities, Defen
dants have and continue to misle
consumers of PLAINTIFFS' and ad
DEFENDANTS' services in their
COMMERCIAL SPEECH. Plaintiffs
27
1
reasonably believe they are likely to be misled and damaged by such COMMERCIAL SPEECH again in the
future.
914. As an actual and proximate result PLAINTIFS have been injured ín a nature an amount to be proven at trial.
RICO 915. In addition to thc allegations regarding each Defendant above, defendants are each engaged in activities
ALLEGATIONS which constitute Enterprise operations under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act of 1970
RICO (RICO). The following entities are defined as a "person," as that term is defined pursuant to Section 1961(3) of
DEFENDANTS
RICO. Such Defendants include:
925. By virtue of their affiliations, associations, and collaboration as alleged herein, RICO Defendants function
collectively as alter ego vehicles ofone another facilitate and further the commercial purposes ofthe
ENTERPRISES alleged herein.
926. Specifically, in addition to the conspiracy allegations detailed above, each defendant ts liable as a principal
pursuant to 18 U. S.C. § 2(a)-(b), and that each RICO person that is a RICO de fendant is liable as a co-
conspirator pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 371.
927. Defendants, and each of them, while affiliated with one or more ENTERPRISES, have operated, affiliated
with, and participated directly and indirectly in the conduct o f ENTERPRISE affairs through a pattern o f
racketeering activity, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1964 (b), (c), and (d) as follows:
RICO 928, Each ofthe following configurations, for purposes of plaintiff RICO §1962(c) Claims for relief, constitute
ENTERPRISES an enterprise engaged in, or the activities of which affect, interstate or international commerce as those term is
defined pursuant to Title 18 United States Code §1961(4) of the Racketeer tnfluenced and Corrupt Organizations
Act of 1970 ("RICO"), Odom v. Microsofi Corp., 486 F.3d 541 (9ih Cir. 2007) and Boyle v. United States, 129 S.
Ct . 2237 ( 2009 ) ( collectively " RICO ENTERPRISES ") The VSB , Judiciary , Government is organized and
maintained by and through a conscnsual hierarchy of, managers, directors, officers, supervisors, agents, deputies,
and/or representatives that formulate and implement policies relative to the dispensing and providing the
rendition ofjudicial services to the public, including, but not restricted to, lawyers practicing before, networking
with, funding, and collaborating with this enterprise, including, but nw restricted to, aspects of family law, child
custody, and domestic relations, acting in concert with one and others unknown to Plaintiffs, engaged in a course
of conduct and a pattern ofpractice formulaied, designed, intended, implemented, and executed to as part ofone
or more.
With respect to each ENTERPRISE:
GENERAL Commercial Purpose
ENTERPRISE 946. The constituent members comprising each ENTERPRISE arc engaged in a conccrted campaign
to extort,
ALLEGATIONS defraud, trick, deceive, corruptly persuade, victims, including primarily family court litigants and
their children
and extended families.
947. Further, in unfairly protecting their commercial purposes, each ENTERPRISE harasses, threatens,
assaults,
abuses. dcnigrates, impugn, and/or otherwise harms, threatens, and attempts to hann,
competitors, critics,
reformers, and others.
948. The ENTERPRISES operate as a "cabal," a semi privale, sonietinics secret, informal
affiliation ofentitics
with public presence and identity that is wholly or partially inaccurate and misleading
as to the true goals,
affiliations , and processes o f the cabal . The ENTERPRISES achieve
their respective purposes by fraudulent
collusion among operators and affiliates, who in their COMMERCIAL SPEECH
represent to their clients that
the relationships among the members are in compliance with legal and ethical
PROFESSIONAL DUTIES when
they in fact are not. See "False Flag" and "Poscr Advocac
y".
(COMMERCIAL PURPOSES).
949. The ENTERPRISES also compete unfairly through their COMMER

CIAL SPEECH by misiepresentíng the
legitimacy ofthe ENTERPRISES, by representing that their illegal
behavior is "how it is" in a "take it or leave
it" breach of one or more PROFESSIONAL DUTIES
.
950 . The ENTERPRISES also compete unfairly within the
marketplace by creating the imprcssion that non -
ENTERPRISE entities are incapable of representing the interests
of family law clients. In the present case, the
ENTERPRISES operated as alleged to suppress and retaliate
for Plaintiffs PUBLIC BENEFIT
ACTIVITIES by HARRASSMENT AND ABUSE to restrict
the family law marketplace access, knowledge, and
awareness to only ENTERPRISE operators and
affiliates.
28
951. Funded by fraudulent exploitation ofthc ENTERPRISE operators and affiliates engage in bribery,
exchanging value, emolumcnts, patronagc, ncpotism, and/or kickback schemes within their networks to assure
system-wide "cash flow" and continued viability and vitality ofthe ENTERPRISES. ENTERPRISES refuse
such cooperation with non-afñliates, thereby baring potential competitors. These bars include fraudulently
manipulated referrals, representations, certifications, nepotism, íllegal antitrust tactics, and manufactured pitfalls
to support the pervasive "who you know" cabal in defiance ofthe rule of law.
952. When necessary, itlcga! marketplace protections are perpetrated by illegal criminal justice system sanctions
byjudicia! officer, direct attacks such as the Janice Jailing and HARASSMENT AND ABUSE. This predatory
competitive behavior targets any entity, association, or organization that supports and
advocates for purposes, including Plaintiffs (ENTERPRISE UNFAIR COMPETITION).

Scheme and 984. Defendants have operators regularly breach one or more of their PROFESSIONAL DUTIES of loyalty,
Artiñce to Defraud zealous advocacy, fiduciary responsibility, and professional competence through one or more "false flag" frauds
1 to induce, deprive, or deceive Thesc "False Flag" maneuvers involve one or more COMMERCIAL SPEECH
False Flag misrepres¢ntations, thereby dcpriving them of the benefits o f legal professional services, and pcrpctrating fraud.
breach of "False Flag" schemes and artifices include:
PROFESSION 985 . Poser Advocacy . "poscr Advocacy " is the practice and sale of what appears to be the practice oflaw to the
AL DUTIES unsophisticatcd . Attorneys engaging in poser advocacy act to appeal to their client's emotiolìs, greed, or other
untoward ends to generate fees with no beneficial legal work performed. Poser advocates write angry letters
("paperwads "), exchange worthless formwork discovery, or repeatedly file baseless motions with no hope of
success ("late bombs"), to generate what looks like legitimate legal work to an unsophisticated acclimated to a
daytime TV diet of Judge Judy drama and CSI suspense.
986 . In the more sophisticated commercial legal marketplace , poscr advocacy is not tolerated as clients insist ,
and attorneys abide by, legitimate practice and ethical standards. Because ofthe unique nature ofthe clients and
market.
987. Yet given the nature ofthe marketplace and absence of awareness of the fraud, there is little incentive to
eradicate its existence. Because it is highly profitable, even ifillegal, it is there fore quietly encouraged. Because
it can only exist in a market place where all players-thc attorneys, professional service providers, and even
judges--play along, it requires a "caba!" enterprise to be successful. Outsiders such as Plaintiffs who offcr legal,
safe, and far more efficient services are market spoilers, and as such are illegally targeted as described herein.
988 . False Flag Collusioir. Operatives regularly collude with erstwhile opponents-- opposing counsel or entities
representing the state, or at appropriate times working with or on behalf of the clicnt or jointly with the client.
Such collusion is a violation o f one or more PROFESSIONAL DUTIES of loyalty, zealous advocacy to assert
client rights adverse to other entities, and fiduciary responsibility.
989 . False Flag Abstention : fail to observe ofassert for the client rights when under one or more
PROFESSOINAL DUTIES to do so, failure to observe constitutional restrictions on use o f color of law
authority. Such failures in general include:
990. Failure to object to impermissible procedure, inadmissiblc evidence, and move to strike scandalous or
impertincnt matter;
991. Failure to insist on procedure consistent with the Virginia Code of Civil Procedure for motions;
992. Failure to seek sanctions for improper procedure;
993. Failure to object to unconstitutional laws, or processes harmful io their client;
994. Permitting or cooperating with Family Court or opposing counsel to tnisrepresent the rights and duties
adverse to the client;
995. Otherwisc failing to zcalously represent thc client's interests.
RICO §1961(5) 1000. RICO Defendants engage in thc following "racketeering activity," as that term is defined pursuant to 18
PATTERN OF
U.S.C. § 1961(5) ("RACKETEERING ACTIVITY"). RICO Defendants' RACKETEERING ACTIV[TY as
RACKETEERING
committing, aiding and abetting, or conspiring to commit, tens of thousands of violations ofthc following
ACTIVITY laws
within the past ten years, including:
ALLEGATIONS
18 U.S.C. § A. Fraud and related activity in connection with identification documents, authentication features,
1961(5) B. and information: 18 U.S,C. § 1028;

COMMISSION OF C. Mail Fraud: 18 U.S.C. § 1341
RICO §1961(1)(B) D. Wire Fraud: 18 U. S.C. § 1343
29
RACKETEERING E . Bank Fraud : 18 U . S . C . § 1344
ACTIVITY: F. Intangible Personal Property Right Deprivation: Title 18 U.S.C. § 1346.
§ 1503;
G. Influencing or injuring officer or juror generally: 18 U.S.C.
and committees: 18 USC 8 1505;
H. Obstruction of proceedings before departments, agencies,
I. Obstruction of Criminal Investigations: 18 U.S.C. § 1510;
J. Tampering with a witness, victim, or an informant: 18 U.S.C. § ] 512;
K. Retaliating againsta witness, victim, oran informant: 18 U.S.C. § !513;
L , Peonage ; obstructing enforcement : 18 U . S . C . § 1581 ,
M. Enticement into slavery; 18 U.S.C. § 1583;
N. Sale into involuntary servitude: 18 U.S.C. § 1584;
0. Seizure, detention, transportation or sale of slaves: 18 U.S.C.§ 1585;
P. Service on vessels in slave trade: 18 U.S.C. § 1586;

Q. Possession of slaves aboard vessel: 18 U.S.C. § 1587;
R. Forced labor: 18 U.S.C. § 1589;
§ 1590;
S. Trafficking with respect to peonage, slavery, involuntary servitude, or forced labor: 18 U.S.C.
involuntary
T. Unlawful conduct with respect to documents in furtherance of trafficking, peonage, slavery,
servitude, or forced labor: 18 U.S.C. 1592;
U. Benefitting financially from peonage, slavery, and trafficking in persons: 18 U.S.C. § 1593A,
Conspiracy, attempt to commit acts ofpeonage, slavcry, proscribed: 18 U.S.C, § 1594;
W. Interference with commerce by threats or violence: 18 USC § 1951;
X. Interstate and foreign travel or transportationinaidofracketeeringenterprises: 18 U.S.C. § 1952;

Y. Violent crimes in aid of racketeering activity: 18 U.S.C. § 1959
Z. Principal and Aider and Abettor, Attempt, Conspiracy Liability: Title 18 U.S.C § 2(a) and (b)
RACKETEERING 1001. This is a Count asserting numerous Claims for relief under RICO section 1962 (c) and (d), based upon
COUNT 1 18 predicate crimes actionable under 18 U.S.C. § 134 I, 1343, and 1346 for Mail, Wire, and Bank Fraud, against
U.S.C. §§ 1962(c), defendants as identified per Claim in this Count.
(d) Frauds and
1002. All prior paragraphs are re-alleged and incorporated as if set forth ín full.
Swindles 18 U.S.C.
§§ 1341, 1343, 1344
General 1003. Defendants, having affiliated with one or more ENTERPRISE and devising or intending to devise one or
Allegationi to more for obtaining money or property by means of false or fraudulent prctenses, represcntalions, or promises,
Racketeering delivered invoices, accountings, billing statements, letters, reports, and other correspondence into the U.S. mails,
Countl email, telephone facsimile to Janice.
1004. Such use of U.S. mails, emails, facsimile, and wire occurred as follows:
1005 That defendants mailed, emailed documents that were riddled with lies and untruths to protect one of there
own Lawyer Ilona Grcnadier Hcckinan.
1006 Lawyers / Defendants there agents on severa] occasions mislead and Obstructed Justice ín the courts to
protect one of their own.
RACKETEERING 1031. This is a Count asserting numerous Claims for relief under RICO section 1962 (c) and (d), based upon
COUNT 2 predicate crimes actionable under 18 U.S.C. § 1346 for Honest Services Fraud, against defendants as identified
18 U.S.C. §§ per Claim in this Count.
1962(c), (d)
1032. Al! prior paragraphs are re-alleged and incorporated as ifset forth in full.
Honest Services
Fraud 18 U.S.C. §
1346 Agalnd AI!
RICO Defendants
General 1033. Defendants engaged in one or more Enterprise against Janice by and in conjunction with the
Allegations to ENTERPRISES to deprive Plaintiffs ofthe intangible right of honest services.
Countö 1034. On information and belief, Defendants, and each of them, support and promote one another ín perpetrating
each actionable fraud, bribery and/or kickbacks, wherein a quid pro quo (monetary, preferential referral,
business referral, and/or some other form of benefit) is provided by the RICO defendants lo persons unknown to
plaintiffa to assure that Plaintiffs in their PUBLIC BENEFIT ACTIVITIES would be effectively punished,
30
silenced, discrcdited, and rendered ineffective as an effectively competing alternative vehicle offering reasonable
and realistic forms of professional quality services to counsel and advise individual parents and guardians
addressing family law, child custody, and domestic relations issues.

1035. In the case ofmany ofthe Defendants, these quid-pro-quo exchanges are backed up with use of one or
another, such as "that'sjust how it is" or extortion such as "ifyou ever want to sec your girls again ...." which
are enabled by the abuse of process tools ofThe Pit and abstention/en forcennent of illegal Acts and ORDERS.
In Janice's case, additional muscle was provided by the Sheriffs in torturing her while in jail.
1036. The fraudulent quid-pro-quo ignores ethical duties ofloyalty and zcalous advocacy among putativc
opponent lawyers, and judicial officials who disregard their ethically-required adversarial obligations and duties
to enforce law to re-define their opponents as their own clients, take their opponents interests above their clients'
collaborating with opposing counsel and state interests under color of law to extort, defraud, and abuse their own
client base, whom they refer to as " Litigants Behaving Badly " in a grotcsque and reprehensible criminal
enterprise conducted with full knowledge, conscnt, and contribution from public and private servants alike, Or
the hiring of Michael Stuart to drug and get sexual inappropriate pictures, to rape one of Janice's daughters,
plant drugs in the home or on one ofthe girls this was by all appearance ordered by Judge Clark to give the
appropriate evidence to make Janice Incompetent to file any other documents. Ilona, David, DÍMuro and Wieser
and others where in on the Scheme.
1037. Such conduct constitutes the deprivation ofthe intangible personal property right to receíve 'honest-
services' for purposes of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1341, 1343, and 1346.
1038. As an actual and proximate result, Plaintiffs have been damaged or injured in a naturc and amount to be
proven at trial.
RACKETEERING 1039. This is a Count asserting Claims for Relief under 18 U.S.C. § 1962 (c) and (d) bascd upon commission of
COUNT 3 the predicate crimes of
18 U.S.C. 1962(c),
1040. Each Claim for Relief in this Count is actionable as a predicate crime under 18 U,S,C. § 1961(1)(A) as
(d) Kidnapping
"any act or threat involving,,, kidnapping,.- robbery, bribery, extortion ,.. which is chargeable under State law
and punishable by imprisonment for more üian one year."
1041. Each act ofeach Defendant in each Claim in this Count was committed in conducting, participating in,
conspiracy with, or aiding and abetting in furtherance of he purposes of each ENTERPRISE with which the
Defendants is affiliated.
1042. At all times relevant to this Count, each De fendant hereto acted CULPABLY with knowledge ofthe
illegal nature of the Janice Jailing and Kidnapping ofJanice and her witness's by the Commonwealth Attorney
Randy Sengcl and Judge Bowcn Potter to protect there own.Defendants' and each of tlìcir, intent to interfere
illegally with Plaintiffs ' PUBLIC BENEFIT ACTIVITIES and DUE ADMINISTRAT
ION OF JUSTICE .
1043. At no time relevant to this Count did Janice act on his free will or consent
1044. At no time relevant to this Count did any Defendant act with probable cause, good faith,
or pursuant to
lawful authority.
RACKETEERING 1074, This is a Count against Dcfcndants undcr 18 U.S.C. § 1962 (c) and (d), bascd
upün ptcdìc¿itc cr:iìics uí
COUNT 4 extortion under 18 U.S.C. § 1951 under 18 U.S.C. § 1961(1) (A) as "any act or threat involving... kidnapping,
Extortlon
...robbery, bribery, extortion . which is chargcable under State law and punishable by
18 U.S.C. § 1951
imprisonment for more than one year."
Racketeering 1075. This is a Claim against Defendants for extortion and robbery pursuantto
18 U.S.C. § 1951.
Claim For Relief 1076. All prior paragraphs arc rc-allegcd and incorporated as if set forth
in full.
4.1
1077. Defendants, in committing each act described in the response to the
Extortlon, Robbery CLAIM AND DEMAND, (d)
MALICIOUS PROSECUTION and (e) PROSECUTORIAL MISCON
18 U.S.C. § DUCT, attempted, conspired, aided and
1951 abetted, and did obstruct, delay, and affect commerce or the movemen
t of any article or commodity in
commerce, namely, money and valuable things consisting of,
inter alia, (1) money payments to lawyers for
services never rendered., abandonment ofthc competitive PUBLIC
BENEFIT ACTIVITES, and abandonment
of the DUE ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE by robbery
and extortion, committed and thi catened physical
violence to Janicc and her girls PROPERTY in furtherance
of a plan or purpose to extort and rob Janice, .
1078. As an actual and foreseeable result, Janice has been
damaged and injured in a nature and amount to be proven
31
at trial.
Racketeering 1079. This is a Claim against Defendants for extortion pursuant to a crime undcr 18 U,S.C. § 1961(1)(A) as
Claim For Relief "any act or threat involving ... kidnapping, ... robbery, bribery, extortion ... which is chargeable
under State law
4,2 and punishable by imprisonment for more than one year."
1080. Al! prior paragraphs are re-alleged and incorporated as i f set forth in full.
1081. Defendants, and each ofthem, in committíng each act alleged above, attempted, conspired, aided
and
abetted, and did obtain property, namely (1) payment o f money and abandonment of money
Claims relating to
Divorce Lawyer Ilona (2) payment of money and abandonment of money Claims money Claims relating
to
Ilona, (3) abandonment ofthe competitive PUBLIC BENEFIT ACTIVITES, and (6) abandonment
ofthe DUE
ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE from Janice (1) induced by a wrongful use of force or fear
(2) under color
of official right in the (a) Ilona TERRORISM, (b) FRAUD, (c) the response to the CLAIM AND
DEMAND, (d)
MALICIOUS PROSECUTION and (e) PROSECUTORIAL MISCOND
UCT.
1082. As an actual and foreseeable result, Janice has been damaged and injured in a nature
and amount to be
proven at trial.
RACKETEERING 1083. This is a Count asserting Claims for relief undcr RICO section 1962
(c) and (d), based upon predicate
COUNT 5 crimes actionable against Defendants identified in each Claim ofthis Count.
Obstructlon of
Justice
18 U.S.C. §§
1962(c), (d)
Racketeering This is a Claim against Defendants for Influencing Or Injuring Officer Or Juror Generally
pursuant lo 18 U.S.C.
Claim for Relief 5.1 § 1503.
Obstruction of 1084. All prior paragraphs are re-alleged and incorporated as if set forth
Justice in full.
1085. Defendants, by the (1) Janice Jailing, (2) MALICIOUS PROSECU
18 U.S.C. §§ TION, (3) PROSECUTORIAL
1962(c), (d) MISCONDUCT, and (4) OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE corruptly, by threats
and force, by threatening letter or
18 U.S.C. § 1503 communication, endeavored to influence, intimidate, and impede Janice in performanc
e of her
PROFESSIONAL DUTIES, and corruptly or by threats or force, and by threatening
letter or communication,
influenced. obstructed, and impeded, and endeavors to influence, obstruct, and
impede, Plaintiffs from
continuing in their cooperation with the FEDERAL LAW
ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS in pursuing the DUE
ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE.
1086. As an actual and proximate result, Plaintiffs have been damaged or injured
in a nature and ainount lo be proven
at trial
Racketeering 1087. This is a Claim against Defendants for Obstruction of proceedings before
departments, agencies, and
Claim for Relief 5.2 committees pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § ]505.
1088. All prior paragraphs are rc-alleged and incorporated as
Obstruction of ifset forth in full.
1089. Defendants corruptly and by force or threat of force in the (1) Janice
Justice Jailing, (2) MALICIOUS
18 U.S.C. §§ PROSECUTION, (3) PROSECUTORIAL MISCONDUCT, and
(4) OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE endeavorcd
1962(c), (d) to and did influence, obözruct, er impede Plaintiff PUBLIC
BENEFIT ACTIVITES and
18 U.S.C. § thc DUE ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE before FEDERAL
LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS, and the
1505 due and proper exercise ofthe power of inquiry under which any
inquiry or investigation is being had by either
House, or any committee of either House or anyjoint committe
e ofthc Congress ofthe United States
pursuant to PLAINIFF ' s PUBLIC BENEFIT ACTIVIT
IES before the Representatives ofthe United States .
1090. As an actual and proximatc result, Plaintiffhavc
been damaged or injured in a nature and amount to be
proven
at trial
Racketeering 1091. This is a Claim against Defendants for Tampering
with a witness, victim, or informant pursuant to 18
Claim for Relief 5.3
U. S . C . § 1512 ( a)( b )( c )( e)( 2 )( A ).,( B ),( C
),
18 U.S.C. §§
1092. All prior paragraphs are re-alleged and
1962(c), (d) incorporated as if set forth ín full.
1093. Defendants, by the (1) Janice Jailing, (2) MALIC
IOUS PROSECUTION, (3) PROSECUTORIAL
Tampering with a MISCONDUCT, and (4) OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTIC
E CULPABLY used and threatened use ofphysical
witness, victim, or force, including confinement, against Janice,
and the threat and attempted to do so, with intent
informant - other to influence,
delay, or prevent the testimony of Plaintiffs and her
witness's, in THE DUE ADMINISTRATION OF
harm JUSTICE.
1110. Defendants acted corruptly in making the
18 U.S.C.§1512(a) fraudulent and coercive stalelnents attributed to
them in each
section above, thereby acting with an improper
purpose to obstruct, thwart or mislead Janice
into divcrting their
32
(b) (c) (d)( e) contacts with thc U . S . Attorney ' s Office , F . B . I , and others in thc DUE ADMINISTRATIO
N OF JUSTICE and
(2)(A), (B), (C), PUBLIC BENEFIT ACTIVITIES
1112. Defendants' false, misleading, deceptive, concealing, or destroying behavior included disingenuous
allegations, including claims in a complaint that violated Janice United States Constitutional rights and federal
criminal law.
1094. As an actual and proximate result, Plaintiffs have been damaged or injured in a nature
and amount to be proven
at trial,
Racketeering 1127. This is a Claim against all RICO Defendants for Conspiracy to Rctaliatc against a witness,
victim, or an
Claim for Relief 5.4 informant to 18 U.S.C. § 1513(f).
18 U.S.C. §§
1128. All prior paragraphs are re-alleged and incorporated as i f sct forth in full.
1962(c), (d)
1129. Defendants, and each of them, CULPABLY conspired with each other DEFENANT
to commit each act
described above.
Conspiracy to
Rctaliate agalnst n 1130. As an actual and forcsceablç result, Plaintiffs have bccn damaged
or injured in a nature and amount to bc
witness, victim, or proven at trial.
an informant
18 U.S.C.§1513(0
RACKETEERING 1131. This is a Claim against Defendants by Janice for Violent Crime in Aid of Rackeleerin
g pursuanl to 18
COUNT 6 US.C. i 1959.
18 U.S.C. §§
1132. All prior paragraphs arc rc-alleged and incorporated as ifset forth in full.
1962(c), (d)
1133. Defendants in the (1) Janice Jailing, (2) MALICIOUS PROSECU
TION, and (3) PROSECUTORIAL
Violent Crime in MISCONDUCT attempted, threatened, conspired, aided and abctted, and did kidnap,
assaulted with a dangerous
Aid of weapon, assaulted resulting in serious bodily injury upon, and threatened
to commit a crime of
Racketeering violence to Janice in violation ofthe laws ofthe State ofVirginia and
the United States, in exchange for (i)
18 U.S.C. § 1959 consideration, a promise or agreement to pay, pecuniary value, from each
ofthe ENTERPRISES, or (ij) the
purpose of gaining entrance to or maintaining or increasing position in
each of the ENTERPRISES.
1134. As art actual and proximate result, Plaintiffs have been damaged
or injurcd in a nature and amount to bc proven
at trial
RACKETEERING 1135. This is a Claim against all RICO Defendants for aiding and abetting primary
contravention of 18 U.S.C. §
COUNT 7 1962(c) under 18 U.S.C. § 2(a)-(b) and § 1962(c).
1136. All prior paragraphs arc re-alleged and incorporated as ifset forth
in full.
RICO Aiding and 1137. Defendants employed the U.S. mails and/or federal interstate
wires, as weil as engaged in racketeering
Abetting activity as alleged herein, to aid and abet the primary RICO
§ 1962(c)) contravenlions committed by Defendants
18 U.S.C. §§ 2(a)- as alleged herein above.
(b) and §1962(c))] 1138. Defendants were knowledgeable and aware of the commiss
ion ofthe primary RICO conlruventions
Against All RICO committed.
Defendants 1139. Defendants substantially assisted in the commission ofthe
primary RICO contravenlions bysaid
defendants, thereby deriving a monetary benefit ns
a result thereof to the cletrimcnt o f Plaintì Ífs.
RICO Recovery 1140. plaintiffs pray, pursuant to Title 18 United States

Code §1964(c)), treblc damages in the amount to be
determined by offer of proof at time o f trial. Plaintif
fs arc also entitled to recover attorneys' fees and costs
ofthis
litigation, as weil as damages arising from lost profits
and/or lost business opportunities attributable to the
activities engaged in by defendants committed
in furtherance ofcach RICO ENTERPRISE.
RACKETEERING 1141.This is a Claim against all RICO Defendants
for aiding and abetting a RICO Section 1962(d) conspir
COUNTB acy
in contravcntion of 18 U.S.C. § 1962(c), pursuan
t to 18 U.S,C. §§ 2(a)-(b) and 1962(c)-1962(d)
Aiding and 1142. All prior paragraphs are re-alleged and
incorporated as if set forth in full.
Abetting a RICO
1143. Defendants employed the United States
Section 1962(d)
mails and/or interstate wires, as well as engage
d in racketeering
activity as alleged herein, to aid and abet the
Conspiracy primary RICO § 1962(c)) contraventions commi
tted by Defendants
and other RICO Defendants and persons unknow
n to plaintiffs as alleged herein above.
18 U.S.C. §§ 2(a)- ! 144. Defendants' actions constitute mediat
e causation resulting in exettion of some causal
efïect upon other
(b) and §§1962(c)- Defendants' conduct by virtue ofthe affilia
ting with one another for criminal purpos
es.
1962(d) 1145. Such criminal affiliation constitutes
a voluntary act committed with a culpab
le nwns rea that causes a
33
Against All RICO societal harm and concomitant social harm,
Defendants
1146. Defendants' conduct constitutes aiding and abetting a RICO §1962(d) conspiracy
inastnuch as defendants:
were associated wíth a cnminal venture as alleged herein, participate
d in thc criminal venture as something the
dcfcndants wished to bring about; and sought by their actions to make it
succeed.
1147. Defendants were knowledgeable and aware ofthe commission
ofthe primary RICO contraventions
comrnitted by others.
1148. Defendants substantially assisted in the commissi

on of thc primary RICO contraventions, thereby deriving
a monetary benefit as a result to the detriment of Plaintiff.
1149. Defendants aided and abcttcd a RICO Section 1962(d)

conspiracy between said defendants to contravene
RICO Section 1962(c)) to injure and/or damage Plaintiffs
' interests in business and/or property.
1150. Plaintiffs allege that Defendants are conspiratorially
liable under Pinkerton, v. US., 328 U.S. 640 (1946)
and Salinas v. US., 522 U.S. 52 (1997) for the substanti
ve RICO Section 1962(c)) contravciìtions comtnitted
by
defendant inasmuch as Defendants:
engaged in the fraudulent activities that constitute the

RICO § 1961(5) pattern of racketeering activity;
are members of the RICO §1962(d) conspiracy designed
and intended to contravene RICO § 1962(c)),
engaged in activities in furtherance of advancin
g and promoting the RICO § ]962(d) conspiracy
designed and intended to contravene RICO § 1962(c));
are members ofthe RICO § 1962(d) conspiracy at
and during the tirne frame the fraudulent activities
were committed that constitute the RICO §1961(5)
pattern of racketeering activity: and,
The offense fell Within thc scope of the unlawful
agreement and could reasonably have been foreseen io
be a necessary or natural consequence ofthe unlawfu
l agreement.
RICO Recovery 1151. Plaintiffs are entitled to recover, pursuant to
Title 18 United States Code §1964(c)), treble damages
in the
amount to be determined by o ffer o f proo f at time
o f trial, Plainti ffs are also entitled to recover attorneys
' fces and
costs ofthis litigation, as well as damages arising
from lost profits and/or lost business opportu
nities attributable to
the activities engaged in by defendants commit
ted in furtherance of each RICO ENTERPRISE
RACKETEERING 1152. This is a Claim against all RICO Defenda
nts for commission ofconspiratorial contravention
COUNT 9 of 18 U.S.C.
§ 1962(c) based on a conspiracy as defined
under 18 U.S.C. § 1962(d), Pinke,·ton v. US.,
Conspiracy to 328 U.S. 640 (1946)
and Saünas v. U.S,522 U.S.
violate 18 U.S.C. 52 (1997)
1153. All prior paragraphs are re-alleged and
1962(c) incorporated as ifset forth in full. RICO Conspi
ratorial
Pursuant to 18 Liability- Mediatc Causation Contc
ntions
U.S.C. § 1962(d)\ 1154. In committing each act alleged, Defendants
mutually agreed to engage in the aforementioned
racketeering
Plnkerton v. U. S., activities and/or other wrongful conduc
t giving rise to the RICO Section 1962 ( c ) contraven
tions .
328 U.S. 640 (1946) 1155. The objective ofthat mutual agreem
ent was to destroy Plaintiffs' interests in
and business and/or property.
1156. Such çonduct constitutes contra
Salinas v. U. S., vention of 18 U.S.C. § 1962(d)
1157. Further, Defendants' actions are deemed
522 U.S. 52 to constitute mediate causation resultíng
with the exertion of
some caugal effect upon other Defen
dants' conduct by virtue ofthc affiliat
(1997) ing with one unother for criminal
Against All RICO purposes.
Defendants 1158. Such criminal affiliation constitutes a voluntar
y act committed with a culpable mens rea that causes
ü
societal harm and concomitant social harm.
1159. Defendants employed thc U.S. mails and/or
interstate wires, as well as engaged ín rackete
ering actiyity as
alleged herein, to aid and abet the primary RICO
§ 1962(c)) contraventions committed by Defend
ants and other
RICO persons unknown to plaintiffas alleged
hcrein above.
1160. Defendants were aware of the comm
ission ofthe primary RICO contravcntions.
1161. Defendants substantially assisted in the
commission ofthe primary RICO contraventions
, thereby deriving
a monetary benefit as a rcsult to the detrim
ent of Plaintiffs.
1162. Defendants aided and abetted a RICO
Section 1962(d) conspiracy between said
defendants to contravene
RICO Section 1962(c)) to injure and/or
damage plaintiffs' interests in business
and/or property
1163. Defendants are liable as conspirators
as defined under Pinkerton, v. US, 328
U.S. 640 (1946) and Salinas
v. US.,522 U.S. 52 (1997)] for the
substantive
RICO Section 1962(c)) contraventions
committed by other Defendants inasm
uch as Defendants:
engaged in the fraudulent activities that
constitute the RICO § 1961(5) pattern
of racketeering activity;
are members of the RICO §1962(d) conspi
racy designed and intended to contravcne
RICO § 1962(c));
engaged in activities in furtherance of
advancing and promoting the RICO §1962
(d) conspiracy
34
designed and intended to contravene RICO § 1962(c));
are members ofthe RICO §1962(d) conspiracy at and during the time frame the fraudulent activities
were committed that constitute the RICO § 1961(5) pattern of racketeering activity; and,
The offense fell within the scope of the unlawful agreement and could reasonably have been foreseen to
be a necessary or natural consequence of the unlawful agreement.
RICO Recovery 1164. Plaintiffs are entitled to recover, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1964(c)), treble damages in the amount to be
determined by offcr of proof at time of trial. Plaintiffs arc also entitled to recover attorneys' fccs and costs of this
litigation, as well as damages arising from lost profits and/or lost business opportunities attributable to the activities
engaged in by defendants committed in furtherance ofeach RICO ENTERPRISE
RACKETEERING 1165. This is a Claim for conspiracy to contravene 18 U,S,C, § 1962(c) by a conspiracy to commit aiding and
COUNT 10 abetting under 18 U.S.C. § 1962(c) and Pinkerton v. U.S.,328 U.S. 640 (1946) and Salinas v. U.S,
522 U.S, 52
Aiding and
(1997)
Abetting â
1166. All prior paragraphs are re-alleged and incorporated as ifset forth in full, RICO Conspirntorial
Conspiracy to
Contravene 18 Liability- Mediate Causation Contentions
U.S.C. § 1962(c) 1167. At relevant times Defendants mutually agreed to engage in the aforementioned racketeering activities
1SU.S.C. § and/or wrongful conduct giving rise to the RICO § 1962(c) contravcntions.
1962(d)/Pinkerton 1168. Thc objective of that mutual agreement was to destroy Plaintiffs' interests in business and/or property.
v. U. S., 328 U.S.
1169. Such conspiratorial conduct constitutes contravention of RICO §1962(d).
640 (1946) and
1170. Defendants' actions constitute mediatc causation resulting with the exertion ofsome causal
Salinas v. U. S., effect upon
other Defendants' conduct by virtue of the a ffiliating with one another for criminal purposes.
522 U.S. (1997)
Against All RICO 1171. Such criminal affiliation constitutes a voluntary act committed with a culpable
mens rea that causes a
Defendants societal harm and concomitant social harm.
1172. Defendants employed the U.S. mails and/or interstate wires, as well as engaged in racketeering
activity as
alleged herein, to aid and abet the primary RICO § 1962(c)) contraventjons committed
by other Defendants as
alleged herein above.
1173. Each Defendant was aware of the commission of the primary RICO contraventio
ns committed.
1174. Each Defendant substantially assisted in the commission ofthe primary RICO
contraventions by
defendants, thereby deriving a monetary benefit as a rcsul[ to the detriment
of plaintiffs.
1175 . Plaintiffs allege that defendants arc conspiratorially liable
under Pinkerton, v. U. S., 328 U . S . 640 ( 1946 )
and Salinas v. US., 522 U . S . 52 ( 1997 ) for the substantive
Section 1962 ( c )) contraventions committed by
Defendants inasmuch as Defendants:
engaged in the fraudulent activities that constitute the RICO § 1961(5) pattern
of racketeering activity;
are members of the RICO § 1962(d) conspiracy designed and intended
to contravcne RICO § 1962(c));
engaged in activities in furtherance of advancing and promoting the RICO §1962(d)
conspiracy
designed and intended to contravene RICO § I 962(c));
are members of the RICO §1962(d) conspiracy at and during the time
frame the fraudulent activities
were committed that constitute the RICO §1961(5) pattern of racketeerin
g activity; and,
The offense fell within the scope of the unlawful agreement and could reasonably
have been foreseen to
be a necessary or natural consequence ofthc unlawful agreemen
t.
RICO Recovery 1176. Plaintiffs are entitled to recover, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1964(c)),
treble damages in the amount to be
determined by offer of proofat time oftrial. Plaintiffs are
also entitled to recover attorneys' fees and costs ofthis
litigation, as well as damages arising from lost profits and/or
lost business opportunities attributable to the
activities engaged in by defendants committed in furthera
nce of the ENTERPRISES
RACKETEERING 1177. This is a Claim Against All RICO Enterprises
for Orders ofthis Court dissolving each RICO Enterpri
COUNT 11 se
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 1964(a)-(b)
Petition for Orders
1178. All prior paragraphs are re-alleged and incorpo
Dissolvlng RICO rated as if set forth in full.
1179. Plaintiffs respectfully petition the Court, pursuan
Enterprises 18 tto 18 U.S.C. §§ 1964(a)-(b) to issue an order
U.S.C. § 1964 §§ immediately dissolving each identified RICO
§1961(4) ENTERPRISE herein inasmuch as
said RICO
(a)-(b) Against All ENTERPRISES are each a mere subterfuge and/or
alter cgo vehicle for the afore mentioned RICO
defendants to
RICO Enterprises engage in felonious, fraudulent, corrupt, violent
, and illegal conduct, as alleged herein.
Only
RICO Recoyery I l 80. PLAINITFFS are entitled to recover, pursuan

t to 18 U,S,C. § 1964(c) treble damages in the amount
to be
35
determined by offer of proof at time of trial. PLAINITFFS are similarly cntitlcd to
recover atrorncys' fees and
costs of this litigation, as well as damages arising from lost profits and/or lost business
opportunities attributable
to the activities engaged in by Defendants committed in furtherance ofthe ENTERPRISES.
PROSPECTIVE 1181. For each Count seeking prospective relief below, Platnti ffs allege:
RELIEF
FICRO COUNTS 1182. This is an allegation that Defendants in committing the acts alleged in COUNTS 1 -11 and RICO
1-22; COUNTS 1-11, above, concurrently committed one ore move deprivations of Plaintiffs'
rights, privileges, and
Fraud; Deprivation immunities in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 242, 241, and 371. These allegations are
relevant to Defendants'
of Rights, ENTERPRISE, conspiracy, and racketeering activity, and are the basis for Plaintiffs' Claims for
prospective
Privileges and reliefunder 28 U.S.C. § 2201, As such violations are indictablc federal
offenses, and shall hereinafter be referred
Immunities to as FEDERAL INDICTABLE CIVIL RIGHTS OFFENESES (FICRO).
Pursuant to 1183. Ag part oftheir ongoing CIVIL and CRIMINAL CONSPIRACIES to depríve Plaintiff
and others
42 U.S.C. Sections similarly situated of and other civil rights, Defendants have CULPABLY committed
each Count and Claim for
241,242,371 relief alleged herein in furtherance of thc conspiracies alleged hereinabove, establishing
the existence ofthe
Against Defendants crimes, conspiracies, and enterprises alleged herein.
acting under color 1184. Defendants' activities described herein constitute a conspiracy to commit one
or more violations ofthe
of law Family Federal Rights, actionable under the Civil Rights Criminal and Civil
Statutes (FICRO CONSPIRACY).
The purpose of the FICRO CONSPIRACIES is to deprive Plaintiffs and those similarly situated
of their rights,
privilege, and immunities under thc Constitution of United States by
committing, causing, or contributing to, or
ratiíÿing each ofthe acts alleged against each DEFENANT.
1185. Defendants, and each ofthem, acted with specific knowledge o f Plaintiff
and PUBLIC BENEFIT
ACTIVITIES.
1186. On information and belief, upon Icarning ofeach fact relating to Plaintiffs' PUBLIC
BENEFIT
ACTIVITIES, Defendants coordinated efforts, shared knowledge, and
shared a common purpose with one or
more ofthe other Defendants so as to be the agents of on another
in FICRO CONSPIRACY to rctaliate against,
disparage, harm, injure, Plaintiff because o f the same.
1187. In carrying out the FICRO CONSPIRACY, DEFENANTS committed
, were aware of: acquiesced to,
intended, and ratified each act and/or the acts and/or omission
s o f each other De fendant.
1188. Defendants are or were co-workers, collaborators, co-owners,
cooperators, a ffiliates, colleagues, meinbers
ofone another's personal and professional networks ofonc or
more other of Defendants.
1190. Defendants, and each o f them, in committing or conspiring to commit
the acts ascribed to them
CULPABLY acted in furtherance ofthe CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY,
including the ENTERPRISES, entities,
color of law, mis feasance and malfeasance ascribed to
them hcrcin.
1191. As an actual and foreseeable result, Plaintiffs have been damaged
or injured in a nature and amount to be
proven at trial.
Further United States Constitutional Rights:
Amendment I The First Amendment guarantees freedoms concerning religion,

expression, assembly, and the right to petition. Il forbids
Congress from both promotinQ one religion over others and
also restricting an individual's relicious practices. It
[Religion, Speech, Press, guarantees freedom of expression by prohibiting Congress from
restricting the press or the rights of individuals to speak
Assembly, Petition (1791)] freely. It also guarantees the right of citizens to assembl
e Deaceablv and to petition their government
(see exolanationì
Amendment IV The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses,

papers, and effects, against unreasonable
searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no
Warrants shall issue, but upon prcbable cause, suppor
by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing ted
the place lo be searched, and the persons or things
seized. to be
The Fourth Amendment originally enforced the

notion that "each man's home is his castle", secure
from unreasonable
searches and seizures of property by the govern
ment. It protects against arbitrary arrests, and
regarding searçh warrants, stop-and-frisk, safety is the basis of the law
inspections, wiretaps, and other forms of surveill
central to many other criminal law topics ançe, as well as being
and to privacy law
36
Fifth Amendment ÍGrand The Fifth Amendment creates a number of riahts relevant to both criminal and civil legal proceedings. In criminal cases, the I
Jury, Double Jeopardy, Fifth Amendment guarantees the right to a grand iury, forbids "double ieopardy," and protects against self-incrimination. Il also
Self-Incrlmlnation, Due requires that "due Drocess of law" be part of any proceeding that denies a citizen "life, liberty or properly" and requires the
Process (1791)] government to compensate citizens when it takes privale prooertv for public use
(see exolanalion
V1 The Sixth Amendment guarantees the rights of criminal defendants, including the right to a public trial without unnecessary
delav, the riqht to a lawyer, the right to an imgartial iury, and the right to know who vour accusers areand the nature of the
âiälh charges and evidence against you. It has been most visibly tested in a series of cases involvinq terrorism, but much more
Amendment [Criminal Often figures in cases that involve (Íor example) jury selection or the protection of witnesses, including victims of sex crimes as
Prosecutions - Jury Trial, well as witnesses in need of protection from retaliation
Right to Confront and to

Counsel (1791)]
(see explanaöon
Vll In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury
shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United
Seventh States, than according to the rules of the common law,
Amendment [Common
Law Suits - Jury Trial
The Seventh Amendment continues a practice from English çommon law of distinguishing çívil claims which must be tried
(1791)] (see 0*Dlanation
before a ila (absent waiver by the parties) from claims and issues that may be heard by a iudge alone. It only
governs federal civil çourts and has no application to civil courts sel uo bv the states when those couMs are hearing only
disputes of state law
Vlll Excessive ball shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.
Eighth Most often mentioned in the context of the death penalty, the Eighth Amendment prohibits cruel and unusual
punishments, but
Amendment [Excess Ball also mentions "excessive lines"and *!. The »exçessive fines" clause surfaces (among other places)
in cases of civil and
or Fines, Cruel and criminal forfeiture, for example when property is seized durinq a drug raid,
Unusual Punishment
(1791)] (see exDIanation
IX The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to
deny or disparage others
retained by the people.
Ninth Amendment INon-
Enumerated Rights The Ninth Amendment was James Madison's attempt to ensure that the Bill of Rights was
not seen as granting to the people
of the United States only the specific rights it addressed. In recent years, some
(1791)] (see exolanatbn) have interpreted t as affirming the existence
of such ünenumerated" rights outside those exgresslv orotected by the
Bill of Rights
X The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited
by it to the States, are
reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
Tenth Amendment IRight3
Reserved to States or
The Tenth Amendment helps to define the concepl of føderalism, the relationship between
Federal and state governments. As
People (1791)] Federal activity has increased, so too has the problem of reconclìlng state and
national interests 85 they apply to the Federal
(see explanatlon
powers to tax, to police, and to regulations such as wage and hour laws, disclosure
of personal information in recordkeeping
systems, and laws related to strio-minina.
Amendment XIII Section 1. Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a

punishment for crime whereof the paíty shall have been
duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subjecl
to their jurisdiction.
Civil Rlahts
Enforcem9nt Power Section 2. Congress shall have power to enforce tnís article by aopropriate
legislation
Fourteenth Amendment The Fourteenth Amendment addresses many aspects of citizenship and
the rights of citizens. The most commonly used --
and frequently lítigated - phrase in the amendment Ìs "equal
Droteçtion of the laws", which figures prominently in a wide
variety of landmark cases, including Brown v. Board of Education
(racial discrimination), Roe v. Wadefreproductjve
rights), Bush v. Gore (election recounts),Reed v. Reed (gender
discrimination), and Universitv of California v. Bakke (racial
quotas in education). See more.
Section 1 All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject
to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens oí the
United States and of the state wherein they reside. No
state shall make or en force any law which shall abridge
the privileges
or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall
any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property,
process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdict without due
ion the equal protection of the laws.
37
Section 2. Representatives shall be apportioned among the several states according to their respective numbers,
counting
the who,e number of persons in each state, excludjng Indians not taxed.
But when the right to vote at any election for the
choice of electors for President and Vice President of the United States, Representa
tives in Congress, the executive and
judicial officers of a state, or the members of the legislature thereof,
is denied to any of the male inhabitants of such
state, beino twentv-one years of age, and citizens of the United States,
or in any way abridged, except for participation in
rebellion, or other crime, the basis of representation therein shall
be reduced in the proportion which the number of such maie
citizens shall bear to the whole number of male citizens twenty-ôn
e years of age in such state.
Section 3. No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, oi elector

of President and Vice President, or
hold any omce, civil or military, under the United States,
or under any state, who, having previousy taken an oath,
as a
member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member
of any state legislature, or as an executive or
judicial officer of any state, to support the Constitution of the United
States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion
against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies
thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each
House,
remove such disability.
; Section 4.
The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorize
d by law, including debts incurred for payment of
~ pensions and bountles for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall
not be questioned. But neither the United
I States nor any state shall assume or pay any debt or obligation
incurred Ìn aid of ìnsurrecüon or rebellion against the United
States, or any claim for the loss or emancipation of any slave;
but all such debls, obligations and claims shall be held illegal
and void,
Section 5. The Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate

legislation, the provisions of this article.
The Virginia Constitution:
Virginia Article I . Bill of Rights - A

DECLARATION OF RIGHTS made by the good people of
Virginia in the exercise oftheir sovereign
powers, which rights do pertain to them and their
posterity, as the basis and foundation ofgovernment
.
Section 1 . Equality and rights of men .

That all men are by nature equally jree and independ
which , when they enter into a state ofso ent and have ce,·tain inherent rights, OJ
ciety, they cannot, by any compact, deprive or divest
their posterity: namely, the enjoyment
liberty, with the means ofacquiring and possessing
property, and pursuing and obtainin oflife and
g happiness and safety
Section 2 . People the source of power .

That all power is vested in, and consequently
derived J)·om , the people, that magistrates are
trustees and servants, and at aü times amena their
ble to them.
Section 3 . Government instituted for common

benefit . That government is, or ought to be, institutedfor the common
protection, and security of the people , nation benejit,
, or community; ofall the various modes attdjor
nts ofgover , tment, that is best which ís capable
ofproducing the greatest degree Ofhappiness
and safety, and is most ejjectually secured agains
whenever any government shall befòu t the danger oj maladministi ·ation : and,
nd inadequate or contrary to these purpose
inalienable, and indefeasible right to reform. s, a majority ofthe communíty hath an indubitable,
alter. or abolish it, in such manner as shall be judged
most conducive to ( he public wca /.
Section 4. No exclusive emoluments or

privileges ; offices not to be hercditary
. That no man, or set ofmen , is entitled to exclusive or
separate emoluments orprivilegesfrom
the community, but in consideration ofpublic
the olñces ofmagistrate, legislator, or service s : which not being descendible, neither ought
judge to be hereditary.
Section 5. Separation oflegislati

ve, executive, and judicial depar
tments; periodical elections.
judicial departments OI the That tile legislative. execwive. and
Commonwealth should be separate
and distinct: and that the members
by feeling andparticipating the thereof may be restraíi : edjroni oppres
burthens ofthe people , they should, sion,
at fixed periods, be ,·educed ( o a privat
from which they were originally e station, return into that body
taken, and the vaca ,lcies be
supplied by regular elections, in which
shall be again elìgìble, or ìnellg all or any part ofthe former members
ibte, as the laws may direct.
Sectlon 6 . Free elections ; conse

nt of governed. That all elections ought to befre
pennanent common interest with, e, a,td that all men, having sujjìc
and attachment to, the comm ient evidence of
unity, have the right ofsuffrage, and
damaged in, their property cannot be taxed. or deprived
for public uses, without their of, or
own consent, or that oftheir repre
which they have not, in like man sentatìves duly elected, or bound
ner, assentedfor the publ by any law to
ic good.
38
Section 7 . Laws should not be suspended .
That all power oj 'suspending laws , or the execution oflaws
, by any authority, without
consent ofthe representatives
ofthe people, is injurious to their rights,
ünd ought not to be exercised.
Section 8 . Criminal prosecutions

That in criminal prosecutions a man hath a right to
demand the cause and nature oj his accusation ,
to be confrontedwith the accusers and witne
sses, and to call for evidence in his favor, and he shall
enjoy the right (o aspeedy and public
trial, by an impartialjury ofhis vicinage,
without whose unanimous consen { he ccin,iot be Jozind
gttilty. He shall not be deprived o! life or
liberty, except by the law ofthe land or the judgment
ofhis peers, nor be compelled in any crimínal
proceeding to glve evidence against
himself, nor be put twice in jeopardy for the same
ofense.
Laws may be enacted providing for the trial
ofo#enses notfeloniot ,s by a court not ofrecord withoi , t a jitry,
preserving the light
accused to an appeal to and a trial byjury ofthe
in some court ofrecord having original crimina
l jurisdiction. Laws may also provtdefor juries
consisting ofless than twelve, but not less
than five, for the trial of ofenses ,iot
felonious, and may classify such cases, and prescri
number ofjurorsfor each class. be the
In criminal cases, the accitsed may plead guilty.

If the accused plead not guilty, he may, with his consent and the concur
Commonwealth's Attorney and ofthe court rence ofthe
entered ofrecord, betriedby a
smaller number ofjt, rors, or waíve ajitry. In case ojsuch
or plea ofguilty, the court shall try waiver
the case.
The provisions ofthis section shall
be self- executing.
Section 8 - A . Rights of victims of crime.

That in criminal prosecutions, the victim shall
be accordedjàirness, dignity and respect by
the omcers, employees and agents oftile
Comntonwealth and its political subdivisions and
ojjìcers of the courts and, as the General
Assemblymay dejìne andprovide bylaw
, may be accorded rights to reasonable
and appropriate notice, infornzation, restitution, protectio
and access to a meaningíul role in n,
the criminaljustice process.
These rights may include, but not be limited to, thejòllow
ing
0 1 . The right to protectionfrom further harm or

reprisal through the imposition ofappr
opriate bail and conditions oj release :
0 2. The right to be treated with respe
ct, dignity andfairness at all stages
of the criminal justice system :
0 3. The right to address the circuit
court at the time sentence is imposed:
0 4. The right to receive timely notification
ofjudicial proceedings,
0 5. The right to restitution:
0 6. The right to be advised of releasefr
om custody or escape of the o#ender , whethe
r before or after disposition , and
0 7. The right to confer with the prosec
ution.
0
This section does not confer
upon any person a right to appeal or modify any decision in a criminal
right guaranteed by the Constitution proceeding, does not abridge any other
ofthe United Stütes or this Constitution
damages against . and does not create any cause of action jòr compensation
the Commonwealth or any ofits political subdivisions, any oßicer, or
employee or of the Commonwealth or any of its
political subdivisions, or any o#icer ofthe agent
court.
The amendment rati,fìed November 5 ,
1996 and efective January 1 , 1997 -Add
ed a new section (8 -A)
Section 9. Prohlbltlon of excessive bail and

fines, cruel and unusual punishment, suspcn
ex post facto laws. slon of habeas corpus, bills of attalnder,
and
That excessive bail ought not to be
required, nor excessive fines imposed,
nor cruel and unusual punishnzents in./licted. that the
the writ ofhabeas corpus shall not be privilege oj
suspended unless when, in cases ofinvasion
General Assembly shall not pass any or rebellion , the public äafety may requir
e. and that the
bill of attainder, or any ex post facto
law.
Section 10. General warrants

or,earch or seizure prohibited
.
That general warrants, where
by an ofìcer or messenger may
be commanded to search suspe
or to seize anyperson orpersons cted places whhout evidence
not named, or whose ofense ís not oj afact committed,
particuktrly described and
oppressive, and ought not to supported by evidence, are grievous
be granted. and
Section 11. Due process oflaw;

obligation of contracts; taking
or damaging of private property;
in civil cases. prohibited discrimination; jury
trial
That no person shall be depriv
ed ofhis life, lìberty, or property
withoi, t due process oflaw : that the
impairing the obligation ofcontracts General Assembly shall not pass any
; and that the right law
to be free from any governmen
conviction , race, color, sex, tal discrimination upon the basis
or national origin shall not of religious
be abridged, except that the mere
discrimination. separation ofthe sexes shall ,iot
be consìdered
That in controversies resp
ecting property, and in suits
between man and man, trial
sacred. The General Asse byjury is preferable to any other
mbly may limit the number , and ought to be held
ofjurorsfor civil cases
That the General Assembly in courts of record to not less tha
shall pass no law whe ,dìve.
reby private property, the right
for public we. No privak property shall to wh ich is fundamental,
be damaged or taken for shall be damaged or taken excep
public use without just comp t
property may be ensation to the owner thereof
taken than necessary to achi No more private
eve the stated public use.
taken, lost projìts and lost acce Just compensation shall be
ss, and damages :o the resi no less tha,t the value ofth
due caused by the taking. e property
dejìned by the General Asse The terms "Iost projìts " and
mbly . A public service "lost access " are to be
company, public service
corporation, or railroad
exercises the power of
eminent domain
39
for public use when such exercise is for the authorized
provision of utíiíty, common carrier, or railroad
or damaging of private property is services . In all other cases , a taking
not for public use if the primary
use isfor private gain, private benejìt, private
increasing tax revenue, or enterprise. increasing jobs.
economic development, except for the cl iminati
on oj a public nuisance existing on the propert
bears the bwden ofproving that the y. The condemnor
use is public, without a presumptio,i
that it is.
The amendment ratified November
6, 2012, and e#ecttve January i , 2013-
ln the heading ofthe section , after "taking
damaging". In paragraph one, after "contra ", added "or
cts", deleted ", nor any law whereby private
property shall be taken or damaged for
withoutjust compensation, the term 'public public uses,
uses ' to be dejined by the General Asvembly ", Added
a new paragraph ajke,· parag }-al)h two .
Section 12. Freedom ofspeech and

of the press; right peaceably to assem
ble, and to petition. That the freedoms ofspeech and ofthe
press are among the great buiwarks ofliber
ty, and can never be restrained except by
despotic governments , that a,iy
write, and publishhis aentimen citizen mayfreely speak,
tson all subjects, belng respon
sible forthe abuse ofthatright: thatth
law abridgtng the freedom ofspe e General Assembly shall not passun
y
ech or ofthe press, nor the right
oj the people peüceably to assem
redress of grievances. ble , and to petition the government For tile
Section 13 . Militia ; standing armie

s ; military subordinate to civil
power . That a weil regulated militia, compo
sed ofthe body ofthe
people, trained to arms, is the proper, naturat, and safe
defense ofa fre state , therejòre, the right
not be infringed: that standing armíes, in e ofthe people to keep and bear arms shall
time ofpeace , should be avoided
as dangerous to liberty; and that in all cases
be under strict subordlnation to , and the military should
governed by, the civil power.
Section 14 . Government should be unifo

rm . That the people have a right to unijòrm governm
separatefrom, or independent ent: and, therefore, that „ o government
of, the government of Virginia, ought to be erected or estab
lished with ti { he limits thereof
Section 15 . Qualities necessary to prese

rvation of free government.
preserved to any peopk, but by afirm That no jree government, nor the blessi, igs oj liberty
. cun be
adherence tojustice, moderation, temper
ance, Jrugalitv, and virtue, byfrequent recurr
fundamental principles ; and by the reco ence to
gnition by all citizens that they have dutie
save in a society where law is respec s as well as ,·ights, and that such rights cannot
ted and due process is observed. be enjoyed
That free government rests, as does
all progress , upon the broadest possibl
e diüüsion of knowledge, and that the Commonwea
itselfof those talents which nature has lth sliottld avail
sown so liberally among its people by
eíïective system ofeducaiíon throughou assuring the opportt, nity for their fullest devel
t the Commonwealth. opment by an
Section 15- A. Marriage.

That only a union between one man and
one woman may be a marriage valid i,i
Commonwealth and its political or recognized by this
subdivisions , Thls Commonwealth and
its political subdivisions shall not create or
jòr relationships ofunmarried recognize a legul stattts
individuals that intends to approximate the
Commonwealth or its political subdivision design , qt,alities, signüìcance, or ellccts of marria
s create or recognize another union, ge . Nor shall this
partnership, or other legal status to which
rights, benefts, obligations, qualities, or efects ofmarriag is assigned the
e. The amendment ratijìed November 7, 2006,
Added a new section (15-A). and elb: ctive January L 2007
-
Section 16. Free exercise of relig

ion ; no establishment of relig
ion . That religion or the duty which we owe
manner ofdischarglng it, can be to our Creator, and the
directed only by reason and convìction,
to the free exercise of religion, acco not byforce orviolence : and, therejbre,
rding to the dictates of co ,ucienc all men are equally entitled
e: and that it is the mutual duty OJ all to practic
love, and charity towards each other e Christianforbearance,
. No man shall be compelled to freq
nor shall bc enforced, restrained, uent or support any religious worship
molested. or burthened in his body , place, or ministry whatsoever,
or belief¿ bu: ali men ahatl or goods, nor shall othe , wise si ,fer on accoun
befree to profess and by argument to t Oj his religious opinions·
maintain their opinions in matters oj
diminish. enlarge. or a#ect their civil religion. and the same shall in nowìse
capacities . A,id the General .4 ¿:semb
ly shal t not
prescribe any rel:giott % (est whate
peculiar privileges or advantages on any ver, or confer any
sect or denomination, or pass any
ofany district within this Common law requirmg or authorizing any ,·eligious
wealth, to levy on themselves or others society , or the
, any taxfor the erection or repair ofany hou. people
orfor the support ofany churc e ofpublic wo ,·ship ,
h or ministry: but it shall be leftfr
support such private contract ee to every perso n to setec t his religious instructor, and to make
as he shall please. for his
Section 17 . Construction of the Bill

of Rights. The rights enumerated in
the people not therein expressed. this Bill oj ' Ríghts shall not be co, istr:ied to
limit other rights oj
Further the Judicial Can

ons Violated by the Jud
ge's as stated against Jud
but, all are guilty by sup ge James Clark from his
porting and ignoring his complaint -
criminal acts and actions
:
1.The Judges have violated Cano
n 1 of the Canons of Judicial
that they: Conduct for the Commonweal
th of Virginia and United State
s of America in
a. failed to uphold the integrity
and independence of the judi
b. failed to maintain and enforce ciary
standards of conduct for fellow
judges , and officers ofthc cour
t.
40
c. failed to observe minimal standards so that
the integrity and independence of the judici
ary would be preserved.
d. failed to construe and apply the provisions ofthe
Canons of Judicial Conduct to further their objecti
e. reduced the public confidence in the integr ves.
ity and independence ofjudgcs and thc
deference of the public to the judgments
rulings of courts and injured the syste and
m of government under law.
f. acted based on favor.
g. failed to comply with the law
h. failed to interpret and apply the laws
that govern us.
i. failed to respect and honor the judic
ial office as a public trust.
j. failed to cnhançc and maintain confi
dence in our legal system.
k. failed to be art arbiter of facts and law for
the resolution of disputes.
!. failed to meet even minimal stand
ards for ethical conduct ofjudges.
2. The Judges violated Canon 2 of the Canon

s of Judicial Conduct in that they failed
to respect and comply with the law and
all times in a manner that promotes public failed to act at
confidence in the integrity and impartiality
ofthc judiciary.
3. Thc Judges violated Canon 3, of the
Canons of Judicial Conduct by failing to perform the duties of his
diligently. Judicial office impartially and
4. The Judges violated Canon 3, Section

3B(2) in that they failed to be faithful
to the law and maintain professional comp
etence in it.
5. The Judges violated Canon 3, Sectio
n 3B(4) in that they failed to hear any
promptly of the business ofthe court proceedings fairly and with patience,
and failed to be efficient and busin failed to dispose
esslike while being honest and delib
erate.
6. The Judges violated Canon 3, Sectio
n 313(5) in that they failed to perform
Favoritism, Cronyism bias or judicial duties without Retaliation,
prejudice. Retribution,
7. The Judges violated Canon 3, Section

313(6) in that she failed to refrain in
Orders from manifesting, by words
prejudice based upon social hierarchy, or conduct, b iaš or
to protect others. Judges violated Canon
person who has a legal interest in 3, Section 3B(7) in that they failed
a proceeding, the right to be heard to accord every
according to law.
8. The Judges violated Canon 3, Secti

on 3B(7) in that they and there staff
communications, or considered other initiated, permitted, and/or considered
communications made to the judge ex parte
impending proceeding on several outsider the presence o f the parties
occasions. concerning a pending or
9. The Judges violated Canon 3 , Secti
on 3B ( 7 ) in that she failed to disclo
38(7)(a) and 38(7)(b) regarding se to all parties all ex parte communicat
a proceeding pending or impending ions described in Sections
before the judge.
on 3B(7) in that they independently
investigated facts in a case outside
evidence other than that presented in the courtroom and considered
documents, and with the fact they did
not allow my witness's to take the stand.
11. Thc Judges violated Canon 3, Sectio

n 38(7) in that they failed to insure
pcrsonnel on the judge's staff. [If that Section 38(7) was not violated
communication between the trial judge through law clerks or other
and thc appellate court with respe
permitted, a copy ofany written comm ct to a proceed ing is
unication or the substance of any
oral communication should be provi
ded to all parties.]
12 . The Judgoo violated Cano
n 3 , Scctlon 3B ( ö ) in that they failed
to dispose promptly of the business
following the law and rules of of thc court . In a fair and unbias why
the Court.
13 . The Judges violated Cano

n 3 , Section B ( 9) in that she
failed to abstain from public comm
any court, and failed to direct simil ent about a pending or impending
ar abstention on the part of cour proceeding in
t personnel subject to his direc
tion and control.
14. The Judges violated Canon
3, Section 3C(1) in that they faile
bias or prejudice and maintain d to diligently dischargc thc judg
pro fcssional competence in e's administrative responsibilities
judicial administration, without
15. The Judges violated Cano

n 3, Section 3C(2) in that they
and control to observe the stan failed to require staff, court offic
dards of fidelity and diligence ials and others subject to the
judge's direction
the performance of thei that apply to the judge and
r official duties. to refrain from mani festing
bias or prejudice in
16. The Judges violated Can

on 3, Section 3C(3) in that
as a they Judge failed to take
matters before the court. in reasonable measures to assu
a professional and fair way re the prompt disposition of
.
] 7. The Judges violated
Canon 3, Section JC(4)
in
a. that they failed to exercise
the power of appointmen
t impartially and on the basi
s ofmertt,
41
b. that they engaged in Retaliation, Retribution, Bias, and showed
favorítism;
18 . The Judges violated Canon 3 , Section

3D ( 1 ) in that they received reliable information indicating a substantial likelihood that other
Judges, and Lawyers hat acted criminally, had conflicts and had
committed violations of these Canons or other laws and they
appropriate action. did not take
19. The Judges violatcd Canon 3, Scction 3D(1) in that they had knowledg
e that Judge and lawyers had committed violations of these
Canons that raises â substantial question as to their fitness for office
and thcv did not inform the Judiçial Inauirv and Rcvicw
Commission or other authorities as they are reauired to do,
20. The Judges violated Canon 3, Section 3D(2) in that

they received reliable information indiçating a substantial
likelihood that the
attorney's in this case and others had committed a violation ofthe
Code of Professional Resøonsíbilitv and thev did not take aopropriat
c
¤Qn,
21. The Judges violated Canon 3, Section D(2) in

that had knowledge that Attomev Ilona Grenadier
Hackman and others has çommitted
violations ofthe Code ofProfessional Resoons
ibilitv that raised a substantial auestion as to his
trustworthincss and fitness as a lawyer
and thev did not inform the Virginia State
Bar.
22. That to date December 2,2015 Janice has personal

ly provided several statement's and Motions to Judge outlining
and offering to provide additional information. ìnuch ofthe above
23. The above Judges have engaged in "conduc

t prejudicial to the proper administration ofjustice
" (Va. Const. art. VI, § !0; Code of
Virginia § 17. ! -906) and therc performance as
a Judge needs investigating and a Special Grand
Jury should be empowered for a fair and
unbias investigation into this court and the
actions of the above Judges.
The Professional Code of Ethics for Lawyers /

Judges:
Professional Code of Ethics

Thc following and possible others have
been Violated thru Misconduct
Rule 1.2 Scope of Representation

(a) A Lawycr,hall abide by a client's decisions concerni
ng the objectives of representation, subject ot parngrap
hs (b), (c) und (d), und shall
consult with the client as to the means by
which tey are to be pursued.
That In the Scheme of stealing from Janice Divorce
Lawyer Ilona Grenadier acted as Janice lawyer
and a " NOTE " for money that was manipulated and when asked for herr documents
out of Junice through lies on or around July 6 , 1990
admission in May of 2008 that it was not David for money by Divorce Lawyer' s own
Grenadier who stole such money only leaving Divorce
to steal from the Sonia Grenadler Trust Lawyer Ilona Grenadicr Heckman
through her law firm.
Rule 1.3 Dlligence
(a) A lawyer shall not with reasonable diligen

t and promptness in representing a client
(b)A lawyer shall not intentionally fail to carry
out a contract ofemployment entered into with
a client for professional services, but may withdra
permitted under Rule 1.16 w as
(c) A lawyer shall not intentionally prejudi
ce or damage a client during the course of
thc professional relationship Divorce 1. awver
.ov,ril çrlmtnal açto to çoycr uo hcr nnd Ilona harmed Janice in
tier law nrms Heallng from the Sonia Grenad
ier Trtist account
Rule 1.4 Communication - Divorce lawver
and other lawvers lied as a Dnttern and
In thc Sonk Grçnadter theft from her pr,ìetlce - Divorce Lawyer Ilona behind
law omce hid Dertinent facts onlv reccnt the back of Cliçnt Jzniçc
and her famllv Rsllona R , a Ilitte lv learned . This facts were kent from Judee Grenwdic
rn and Dractiçe stole from them r ' s sister Ruth
usintz a foreed trust aízrecment
(a) A lawyer shall keep a client reasonably inform

ed about the status ofa matter and prompt
(b) A lawyer ahall oxploin ct matter to the clicnt ly comply with reasonable requests for informa
reasonably necessary to permit the client tion
(c) A lawyer shall inform the client of to in formed decisions regarding the represe
facts pcrtinent to thc matter and ofcom ntation.
munications from another party that
or resolution of the matter. may significantly affect settlement
Rule 1.5 Fees
(a) A lawyer's fccã shall be reasonable,

The factors to be considered in determ
1) The time and labor required, the ining the reasonableness of a fce
novclty and di fficulty of the questi include the following;
ons involved, and he skill requis
2) The likelihood, ifapparent to thc ite to perform the legal scrvicc prope
client, that the acceptance ofthe rly,
particular employment will preclu
3) The fee customarily charged in de other employment by the lawye
the locality for sìmilar legal scrvic r
4) cs
Thc amount involved and the result
s obtained:
5) The time limitations imposed
by the client or by the circu
mstances,
6) The nature and length of the profe
ssional relationship with the
client
42
7) The experience, reputation, and ability ofthe lawyer or lawyers performing
thc services: and
8) Whether the fee is fixed or contingent
(b) A lawyers fee shall be adequately explained to the client
Rule 1.6 Confidentiality ofinformation
(b)To the extent a lawyer reasonably believes necessary the lawyer may rcveal:
(1) Such information to comply with the law or a court order

(3)Such Information whkh clearly establishes that the client has, in the course of the representation,
perpetrnted upon a third party, a FRAUD
related to the subject matter of the representation.
(c) A lawyer shall promptly reveal:

(1) The intention of a client, as stated by the client, to commit a crime and the information necessary
to prevent the crime, but before revealing such
information, the attorney shall where feasible, advise the client of the possible
legal conscquences ofthc action, urge thc clicnt not to commit
the crime, and advise the client that the attorney must reveal the clients criminal intention
unless there upon abandoned, and, if the crime
involves PERJURY by the client , that thc attomcy shall sec to withdraw as counsel
:
(2) Information which clearly establishes that thc client has, in thc course ofthe rcprcscntation
perpetratcd a FRAUD related to the subject matter
of the representation upon a tribunal . Before revealing such information , however
, tile lawyer shall request that the client advise the tribunal of
the FRAUD. For the purposes of this paragraph and paragraph (b)(3),
information is clearly cstablishcd when the client acknowledges to the
attorney that thc client has perpetrated a FRAUD: or
(3) Information concerning the misconduct of another attorney to the appropriate
professional authority under RULE 8.3. Where thc information
necessary to report the misconduct is protected under this Rule, thc attorney
after consultation must obiaìn client consen[. Consultation should
include full disclosure of all reasonably foreseeable consequences
of both disclosure and non-disclosure to the client.
Rule 1.7 Conflict of Interest: General Rule - Bçn DÍMuro met wlth and represçnted Janice Wolk Grenadler
in the overaee of 404 E. Monroe Ave
fire. That Janice di , clo, cd this to Ben DIMuro who by avvearanc
e believes that since he 1 , a Dast President of the VSB and has
donated 10 % ofhis
ø,tate Rt thetlme ofhi, d¢*th - he has Durçhn,ed thc Justice to
hold him above the law and nnvone he represents, Divorce Lawver Ilona
Grensdler Heckman al , o bellcves she l , above the
law and should as the Judíze , and Layers are willine to Dut
their careers on the line to COVER
UP h,r ,•,tmir,el ..•*....a .-*4---
(a) A lawyer shall not represent a client if the representation ofthat client
may be materially limited by the lawyer's responsibilities to anothcr
to a third person, or by the lawyer's own interests, unless; client or
(2) The lawyer reasonably believes the representation will not

be adversely affected; and
(3) The client consents after consultation. When representation o f
multiple clients in a single matter is undertaken, he consultatio
explanation ofthe implications of the common rcprcsent n shall include
ation and the advantages and risks involved.
Rule 1.8 Conflict of Interest: Prohibited Transacti

ons
Rule 1.9 Conflict of Interest : Former Client Jnnlçe Wolk Grcnadler was a former client
of Ben DÍMuro
(a) A lawyer who has formerly represented a client in a matter shall not thereafter represent
antother person in the same or a substantially related matter iii
which that person's interests are materiall y adverse to the interests o f the former client
unless both the present and former client consent
after consultatlon
(b )A lawycr shall not knowingly rcprcäon

t a person in thc same or a substantiall
y related matter in which a firm with which the lawyer formerly
associate had previously represented a client. was
Rule 1 : 10 Imputcd Dlsquallflcatlon : Gener

al Rule
Rule 1;11 Special Confllcts of Interest for Former
and Current Government Officers and Employ
Rule 1.12 Former Judge or Arbltrator ees
Rule 1.13 Organization u Client

Rule 1.14 Client wlth Impairment
Rule 1.15 Safekeeplng Property
(c) All funds reccivcd or hcld by alawyer or law

ñrm on behalfofa client, other than reimbursemen
in one or more identifiable escrow accounts mainta t of advances for costs and expense, shall be deposit
ined at a financial institution in the state in which ed
lawyer or tw firm shall bc deposited therein the law office is situated and no funds belong
exccpl as follows : ing to the
(d)Whcn lhe course of representation

a lawyer is in POSSESESSION OF
PROPERTY in which both the lawyer
property shall be kept separate by the and another pcrson claim interests, the
layer until there is an accounting and
severance of their interests. Ifa dispute
arises concerning their respective interes
the portion in dispute shall be kept separate by the lawyer until t,
530*000. toCOVER UP her and her the dispute is resolved . Dlvorce Inwver In Julv of 1990 mnnioula
law firms involvement ln stetllnf from ted Jnnice into loi, nlne
thc Sonia Grenadier Trust - which
Divorre T.awver Ilona nrenadícr
Ub,ed to turn over to Jaqlçe, That the lawy.çr
, DIMuroG[nsburf and Michael weisekäü-ïñã
And..åïtlgnl, ïlusion wiüi-Judew ïo ôover UPTÍ@-crïmin
al acts
43
Rule 1.16 Declining or Terminating Representation
(b) Except as stated in paragraph (c) a lawyer shall not represen

t a client or where representation has commenced, shall
representation ofa client if withdraw from the
3 ). Thc lawyer is discharged . -

DIVORCE LAWYER ILONA GRENADERacting üs Janice luwver in stealing $ 30 . 000 . from her in a
conversation on July 7 . 1990 has refuse
d to turn over NOTE . She stole the monev to eo into
for GIC to Durchlse orovertiei. Which
payine off moncv stolen through her law firm
indirectlv / dircctlv shows Jtjnire Dut more
çash Into GIC between thls and mone ¥ taken
Bellefonte Partnership then x-husband David out of thc
Grenadler.
Rule 3.3 Cåndor Toward the Tribunal
(e) A lawyer shall not knowingly:
(1) Make a false statement offact or

law to a tribunal;
(2) Fail to disclose a fact to a tribunal when disclosu
re iå necessary to avoid assisting a crimina
l or fraudulent act by the client , subject to
1.6: Rul e
(3) Fail to disclose to the tribunal controlling legal
authority in the subject jurisdiction known
client and not dlsclo~d by opposing to the lawyer to bc adverse to the position of
counsel: or the
(4) Offer evidence that the lawyer knows to
be false. If a lawyer has offered materia
l evidence and comes to know of its falsity,
:hall take reasonable remedlal measu tile lawyer
res.
Rule 3.4 Fairness to Opposing Party and Couns

el
A lawyer shall not:
(l) File a suit, initiate criminal charges,

assert a position, conduct a defense, delay
or when it is obvious that such action a trial, or take other uctìon on behalf o f
would serve merely to harass or malici the client when thc lawyer knows
ousty injure another . THAT IS EXACTLY WHAT THIS SUIT IS -
MALICIOUS TO HARM JANICE
AND HER GIRLS.
Rule 4.1 Truthfulness In Statement

to Others
In the course of representing a client
a lawyer shall not knowingly
(a)
Make a false statement of fact or law; or
(b)
Fail to disclose a fact when disclosure is necess
ary to avoid assisting a CRIMINAL or FRAU
DULENT act by a client
Rule 4.3 Dealing with Unrepresented
Persons
Rule 4.4 Respect for Rights of Third

Person
In representing a client a lawyer shall

not use means tliat have no purpose other
obtaining evidence that violate the legal than to embarrass , delay or burden u third
rights ofsuch a person. person , or usc methods of
Rule 5. 1 Respon,ibility
Rule 5.5 - Unauthorized Practice Of

Law; Multijurisdictional Practice
of Law - DIVORCE I.AWYER I!.ON
A GRFNADÏER IIICKMAN USED
A
LAWYER NOT LICESENDED IN
VIRGINIA TO STEAL REAL ESTA
TE - her açtions have caused manv
homeowners in the Citv of Alexan
dria to have
orooortics with Janice Wolk Orcn
adicr having ownershiu:
(c) A lawyer shall not practice law

in ajuriadictio,i in violation ofthe
regulation ofthe legal profession
(d) Foreign Lawyers: ìn that jurisdiction, or assist anoth
er i,ì doing so.
(1) "Fordgn Inwyer" is a perso
n authorized to practice law by
ihe duly constituted and authorized
governmental body ofany State
United States or the District of or Territory of the
Columbia, or a foreign nation,
but is neither licensed by the Supre
me Court of Virginia or autho
practice law generally in the rized under its rules to
Commonwealth of Virginia,
nor disbarred or suspended
from practice in any jt,risdictio
(2) A Foreign Lawyer shal n.
l not, except as authorized
by these Rules or other law:
(i) establish an oßìce or other
systematic and continuous prese
nce in Virginia for the practice
not physically present in Virgi oflaw, which may occur even
nia; or ifthe Foreign Lawyer is
(ii) hold out to the public or

otherwise represent that the
Foreign Lawyer is admitted
(3) A Foreign I,awyer shaH to practice law in Virginia.
inform the client and inter
ested third parties in writin
(i) that :hi lawyer is not adm g.'
itted to practice law in Virg
inia,
44
(li) thejurisdiction(s) in which the lawyer
is licensed Lo practice. and
(Ut) the lawyer's ol]Ìce address ìn the
foreign jurisdiction.
(4) Á Foreign Lawyer may, ajìer informing the
chent as required in 3(i)-(iìi) above, provide
legal services on a temporary and occasional
basis in
Virginia that:
(i) are undertaken in asãoctation with a lawyer

who is admitted to practice without limitation
in Virginia or udmitted under Part I of Rule IA:5
ofthis
Court and who actively participates ìn the
matter:
(ii) are in or reasonably related to a pending or
potential proceeding before a tribunal in Virginia
or another jurisdiction, ifthe Foreign Lawyer,
or a
perâon the Foreign Lawyer ts assisling, is
authorized by law or order to appear m such
proceeding or reasonably expects to be so
authorized;
(iii) are in or reasonably related to a pendin
g or potential arbitration, mediation, or other
alternative dispute resolution proceeding in
Virginia or
anotherjurisdiction, tf the services arise ou{
ofor are reasonably related to the Foreign
Lawyer's practice in a jurisdiction in which
tile Foreign
Lawyer is admitted to practice and are not
services for which theforum requires pro
hac vice admission, or
(iv) are not within paragraphs (4)(ìi) or (4)(iíi)
and arise out oforare reasonably related to
the representation of a client bythe Foreign
Lawyer in a
jurisdiction in which thi Foreign Lawyer is
admitted to practice or, subject to the foregoi
ng limitations, are governed primarily by mternat
íonal law.
(5) A foreign iegal consultant practicing under
Rule l A:7 of this Court and a corporate counse
l rcgistrant practicing under Part H of Rule
Court are not authorized to practice 1 A: 5 of this
under this rule.
Rule 5.6 Restrictions On Right To Practic

e
A lawyer shall not participate in oferìn
g or making:
• (a) a partnership or employmen{ agreement
that restricts the right ofa lawyer lo practic
e Gfter termina[ion of [he relationship, except
u}î agreement
concerning benejìu upon retirement, or
• (b) an agreem,nt in which a rcstrictìon on

thelawyer's ríght topractíce is partof the
settlement of a controversy, except where
such a restrictionis
approved by a tribunal or a governmental
enti{y.
Rule 6.3 Membership In Legal Services Organ

ization
A lawyer may serve as a director, omce
r or me,nber ofa legal servlce
s organization, apart from the law firm ìn
which the lawyer practices, notwithstandin
that the organization serves person shall not knowin g
s having interests adverse to a client gly participate
oflhe lawyer. The lawyer in a decision or
the organization : action of
0 <G) ifparticípating in the decisíonoracrionw

ouid beincompatible with lhe lawyer s
' obligations to aclie, lt under Rule 1 . 7 , or
• (b) where thedecisionoraction could havea materi
aladverse ejyect on the representation ofa
cltent ofthe organization whose mterests
to a client ofthe lawyer. are adverse
Rule 6.4 Law Reform Activities

Affecting Client Interests
ÁBA Model Rule not adopted.
Rule 6.5
Nonprofit And Court-Anncxed Limit
ed Legal Services Programs
• (a) Á lawyerwho, under the auspices of
a program sponsored by a nonprojìt orga,Li
zation or court, provides shor{-tei·,nlìm
ìted legalservices to a
client without expectation by either the
luwyer or the dient that the lawyer will
provide continuing representutio ,1 m the
(1) i: Sukf•c, :0 Ruks 1 . 7 and matter :
1 . 9(a) only f ( he lawyer know, ihw che represenza
tton of the ctien{ invoives a co ,lßicl of interest
o (2) is subjec . and
t to Rule 1 . 10 onlyif the
lawyer knows that another lowyer assoda
ted with the lawyer ina lawfinn ìs
with respect to the matter. disquallfied by Rule 1 . 7 or 1 . 9 (a)
• (b) Except asprovided in

paragraph (a)(2 ), Rule l. 10 ìs lnapplicable to arepre
sentation governed by this Rule.
Rules 7.1.7.6 - Information Abou

t Legal Services
Rule 7.1 Communications Conc

erning A Lawyer'g Services
• (a) Alawyê, shall Mot make a false
or mislegdìng communiçatioiz
about the lawyer or the lawyer's
services. A communicatlon is false
it contains a material misreprese or nzisleadìng ìf
ntation ofjact or law, or omits
a jàct whe,I omission ofsuchfact
a whole. makes che swtement mate,ially false or
misleading as
• (b) A communication violates this rule

if ü advertises specißc or cumulative case result
s, without a disclaimer that (i) puts
that is not misleading: (ií) states the case results in a context
that case re~ulis depend upon
a variety offactors umque to each
guarantee or predict a similar resut case ; and ( iíi) further states that
t in any future case under case results do not
taken by the lawyer. The disciaim
When the communication ts in cr shall precede the communica
writing, the disdaimer shall be tion ofthe case resuttä.
in bold iype face and uppercase
leaers ín a Joni size that iã u{ leu,[
uã lurge üs the
45
largest text used to advertise the specijìc or cumulative case results a ,id in the same color and against the same colored background as the text used {o
advertise the specijic or cumulative case results.
• (c) Anyadvertisingpursuant to this Rule shall include Ihe name and ofjìce address of at Leaöi one lawyer responsìblefor ÌM content, or, in tile
alternative, a lawjirm may fìk with the Virginia State Bar a current w,·itten statenient identifying the lawyer responsible for the lawfirm 's advertising
and its oílìce address. The law firm shall promptly update the written stateme,lt if there is a,iy change ín status.
• (d) A iawÿershall timelyrespond to and futiycooperate with anyrequests for information bv Ethics Counsel regardi), R the lawyer 's advertising.
Rule 7.3 Direct Contact With Potential Clients

• (a) Alawyershali not solicit employmentfrom a potentialchent if
(1) the potential client has made known to the lawyer a desire not to be solicited by the lawyer : or
(2) the solicitation involves harassment, undue infíuence, coercion, duress, compulsion, intimidation, threats or unwarranted promiîes of benejìls.
• (b) Á lawyer shall not give anything ofvalue to a person for recommending the lawyer 's services except that a lawyer may :
• (1) paythereasonablecostsofadvertisements orcommunicationspermittedbythis Rule and Rule 7,1;
\ o) pay the usual charges of a legal service plan or a not-for-projìt qualijìed lawyer referral service;
j 0) payfora lawpractice in accordance with Rule 1.17: and
\ (4) give nominal gijìs ofgratitude that are neither intended nor reasonably expected to be aform ofcompensationfor recommending a
lawyer 's services.
, • (c) Ewry written, recorded or etectronlc communicationfrom a lawyer solicitlng professionalemploymentfrom a potential client known to bein need
of legal services tn a parttcular matter shall conspicuously display the words "ADVERTISING MATERIAL " on the outside envelope, if any. and at the
beginning and ending ofany recorded or electronic communication, unless the recipient ofthe communication :
• (1 ) lä a lawyer; or
(2) has afamilial. personal. or priorprofeasional reicitionship with the lawyer; or
0) Is one who has had prior contact with the lawyer.
Rule 7.4 Communication Of Fields OfPractice And Certification
Lawyers may state, announce or hotd themselves out aã limiting theír

practice in a particular area or Jìeld oflaw so long as the communication ofsuch
limitation ofp,actics i, in accordance wi:h :he s:andapds of this Rule, Rule 7. 1 and Rule 7. 3, as
appropriatô. A lawyer shall not siate or imply :hai the lawyer
has been recognized or certijìed as a specialist in a particular field of law except as follows:
(a) Á lawyer admitted to engage in patent practìce before the United States Patent and Trademark Oftce mûy use the designaüon "Patent
Attorney " or a
substantta[Iy similar designation:
(b) A lawyer engaged in Ádmtrattypractice may use as a designation "Admi,·alty," "Proctor in Admiralty " or a substantia ![y similar designation;
(c) Á lawyer who has been certijied by the Supreme Court of Virginia as a specialist in some capacity may
use the designütíon of being so certijìed, e .g.,
"certißed mediator " or a substantially similar designation;
(d) A lawyer may communicate the fact that the Ia'*yer has been certified as a specialist in a
field oflaw by a na,ned organization, provided that the
communication clearly states that there is no procedure in the Commonwealth of Virginia for approvi ,
ig certifying organizations.
~
Rule 7.6 Political Contributions to Obtain Legal Engagements or Appointments

by Judges
Rulcs 8.1 - 8.5 - Maintaining the Integrily ofthe Profession
Rule 8.1 Bar Admission And Disciplinary Matters

An applican: for admission to the bar, or a lawyer already admitted
(o the bar, in coiznection with a bar admission application, any certifìcation required to
be, ßied as a conditton ofmaintaining or renewing a license to practic
e law, or in colmectíon with a disciplinary mauer. sha !1 not :
• (a) ]ofowingly mako afalse statement of material fact:
• (b) failtodiscloseafactneceâsary to correct a misapprehension known by the personio have

arisenin the matter,
• (c) failto respondto alawfuldemandforinformationfrom
an admissions or disciplinary authority, except that this Rule does not require disclosure
oj
information otherwise protected by Rule 1 . 6:
or
• (d) ob*ruct a lawful investigation by an admissions or diöciplin
ary authority,
Rule 8.2 Judicial Officials
A lawyer shall not make a statement that the lawyer

knows to befalse or with reckless disregard as to its truth orfalsity ~
co ,îcerní ng [ he qualifications or
integrityofajudgeor other judicialomcer .
For *\ lawyers - Ilona Grenadlcr Hççkman . Ben D
[ Muro . Mlçhael Weiser , Judge John Trun , Hillarv
-follver . Andrea Moslev False Statement, have been n Dnttern
And practice In the Cltv of Alexnnclria Cnurrt (locuments, in
court and to the Sunreme _
46
Cgi:rt of Vlr¥luti
Rule 8.3 Reporting Misconduct
• (a) Á lawyer having reliable information that another lawyer has conmzitled a violation ofthe Rules of Professional Co,iduc{ { hat raises a substantial
question aa to ihat lawyer's honesty, trustworthiness or fitness to practice law shall i,®rm the appropriate professional üuthority,
(b) Alawyer having reliableinformation that ajudge has commìtted a violation ofapplicable rules ofjudicialconduct thut
raises a substantial
question as to the judge'sfitness for omce shall inform the appropriate authority.
, (c) If a lawyer serving as a third party neutral receives relìable information during the dispute resoiution process that another lawyer has engaged iii
misconduct which the lawyer would otherwise be required to report
but for its confidential nature, the lawyer shall attempt to obtain the parties '
written agreement to waive conjìdentiality and permit disclosure of such information
to the appropriate professional authority .
• (d) This Rule does not require disclosure ofinförmation otherwise protected by Rule
1 . 6 or information gained bya lawyer or judge who is a member
Ofan approwd lawyer's assistance program, orwho is a trained i„tervenor or volunteer for such
a program or committee, or who is otherwise
cooperating in a particular assistance e#ort, when such information ís obtained for the purposes
offuljìtling the recogn :zed objectìves ofthe program .
• (e) A lawyer shall inform the Virginia State Bar if
o (1) the lawyer has been disciplined by a state or federal disciplinary

authority, agency or court in any state, U. S. territory. or ihe District of Columbia,
for a violation of rules ofprofessional conduct in that jurisdiction:
o (2) thelawyer haa been convicted ofa felonyin a state, U. S. territory, Districtof Cohimbiu,
or federal court ;
o (3) :helawyer has been convicted of either a críme involving theft, fraud, extortion, bribery or perjug, or an altenlpt,
soticitation orconspiracy to
commit any of the Jòregoing ofenses , ín a state, U. S. territory, Dist,·ict
of Columbia, or federal court. The reporting required by paragraph
(e) of th is
Rule shall be made in writing to the Clerk
of the Disciplinary System ofthe Virginia State Bar not later than 60 days fouowing entry of any fìnal order
or judgment ofconviction or discipline.
Rule 8.4- Misconduct-I]tnt the lawven with the Judecs hnvc had ex-Darte commu:,[catio,is to work
in concert iii court, Ín all Orders as Judfe
James Clark tells the oüoosing side " Write U [) what ever you want and I will sien it "
It Ls profe:sionaI misconduct for a lawyer :o:
• (a) violate or attempt to violat• thø Ruies of Professional Conduct, knowi ,tgly assist or inducc another to do
so, or do so through the acts of another ,
• (b) commit a criminalordetiberately wrongfulact that reflects adversely on the lawyer's honesty,
tn,stworthiness or Jìt,iess to practice law,
• (c) engage in conduc: involving dishonesty, fraud, deceít or
misrepresentation which rejlects adversely on the lawyer 's jìtness to practice law :
• (d) state or imply an ability to influence improperly or upon irrelevant
grounds any tribwial, legislative body, or public oßìcíal; or
• (e) knowlngly assiãt a judge orjudlciat oíßcerin conduct that is a viotation ofapplicable
rules ofjudicialconduct or other law.
47
ti»
*·~.' ·' dk\.' i?.·· ~ '.~ W·'.y, ';* & * * A, W c & 3 . u i r;.x,; :~: MA«r·G~ .·~· 'i~;.·..,·~ ~ · ·,.
VM N / i / 1 % / 9 5 P N M F LÑ/We ü / U lll.#L E FWbh/ R:ÜŽ." P -,;,AM'.2;'»'·'ÄtWWM#'*JA,E h c k V' 'L'.; ~:·' z 6'.,. ' ir~3 SJZ -S t "C,3
AO 91 (Rvv. 11/1 I) Crimi:t.kl Coitlpl~11nt
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

fur die
I::Ištern 1)i.<lri:t i,í' Virgini,i
Unitcd Stntcs: ofAmc,·ic:i

Y, )
Judge James Clark Case No.
)
j
CRIM]NÀL COMPLAINT
j, tlic co,iìpl:fini,nt in this ç:ise'. Ni:ile tliíit ll:e lo]1(,wilìu is truc to lhe best
of my knowledge and belief.
Onor nbout the date(s) oi __Jal-~ary 2012 through Today il) lhC Coutity 0 f . -City of Alexandria
in the
Eastern District of Virglnlo .
thi· dcl'Clìi!:tlìt{:4) Vii)!atcll:
Code Section
(>.tíi·nxc t) ~·
VA Code 8.01 - 428 sc,·íptíon i
Fraud orl thc Court
VA Code 17,105 (b) Designation of Juclges to hold courts and assit other Judges - That a judgel
can not bo bias, rule In Favortlsni, Cronyism with Retaliation
and Relribuüofl
Ir, nrnter: t hìs friends
.
Dtvurce Caäc N„. 099 - 1253
Divorce
Bellefontc Ave Cuse No. CH
010654 All Orders ure
Lis Pendts Ciue No. CL 15- -' VOID " Lis Pcutljs Cnsc Na 1400 - 2193
003661 All Orders nre "VOI All Orders urc *'VOLD"
D"
These nre the cuscs thut Judg Crltnd Jun·Case Xo. MOllüül-182
e Clurk Ruled In
This çriminal complaint is büs,vd on tlk·:C Ittcts:
That Judge James Clark In colusion with Inany in tho

Slatc of Virginia and the District oí Columbia have
Scl ,entod With knowledgable Intend to covor up the crin n,Ellisouslyi
, inoi acts and actions of many in the Judiciary , tho Governmen
and Elected Ofñcials to protect the TRUTH oí the t
Criminal Crime Spree of Oivorce Lawyer Ilona Ely Freedman
Grenüdler Heckman. That the documents show this ,
ctortod soon oftor hot· marraige to the late Judge Albert
Grenadler.
~ Colilitillefl (itl ll,e

ull:lclled >:I,cet.
C,~, iv,t,~t,i.„,i ~.. .,N~~• ~~~-·•'
Janice Wolk Grenadier / VICTIM

/*,·i,i,¿·¿1 H,qmimi,f itífi,
Sworn to bcfoi·c m© otid signed in my 1)1'csencc.
D,i,e.
,/„d,e'· 's .ri'g,Ja<ü, c

Citv :ziìd *tíite:
Pnlt{Ctl Mtlle ttnif mh'

Criminal Complaint against Judge James Clark for cases:
• Divorce Case No. 099 - 1253 The 2000 Grant of Divorce should stay in tack by Judge Kloch : but, all
Orders from Judge Nolan Dawkins / Jlldge James C. Clark are "VOLD", that no
Property Settlerüenr was ever
agreed on and entered into the record.
• Bellefonte Ave Case No. CH 010654 All Orders

are "VOID"
• Lis Pendis Case No. 1400 - 2193 All Orders are "VOID "
• Lis Pen lis Case No. CL 15 - 003661 All Orders are "VOID"
• Grand Jury Case No. M011001482
The Links and Videos that support the Claim

s:
JWG Links - Video Update October
28, 2016
June 22 , 2016 Janice Circuit Court

of the City of Alexandria VA - exposing the corrup
tion '- Judge
James Clark states he and Carter Land were Truste
e's on all of Burke and Herbert Loans for Friend
ship
as he did on June 8, 2016. That Judge Clark
further stated no financial compensation from
Burke and
Herbert band direotly or indirectly. Which must
mean the lawyer representing Burke & Herbert
from his
law firm would have had to do it for free - "friend
ship" still illegal. Janice states this is a "Sham
e
Hearing" - Judge Clark States - "Not on
this side" since when does Judge's tal<e
sides?
https://youtu.be/L05U4Frvdwl
In May of 2016 learned that Judge Clark had

a financial relationship - I contacted the FBI and
the conversation with the FBI that has here is
ignored it:
https://youtu.be/DbdcVaZklt
Q
These two videos show that l spok

e with Gov . Terry McAuliffe and Brian
Moran and showed him my
Box of evidence that
https:Uyoutu.be/kQ1 hRnaxvRc
Janice Exposes the Corr

uption of the City of Alexandria Nazi
Virginia the place Terrorist' š can Buy
$$$$ Justice
https://youtu be. com/watch ? v=q

h BZ Lm VynXc

asking / exposing Mar
k Warner for the 3rd time havi
ng the discussion
he lied.
DSCFOOO5 - Jailed so Sen
ator Mark Warner could
be Re-elected and
https://youtu.be/rRS7(BE
YAJQ
DS¢F0039 Ma; k 9'/.
:,r<:á, x .:.26ti..L -.L
L'·ï Í.. : - >..: -". '. M:.:
httpg:Uyou tu.be/010~FNI q-4~- '. 2 :.
2
These Videos are the tapes of Janice
Woil< Grenadier Standing UP and spea
Alexandria Council Meeting king out at the City of
June 2016 COA Council Meeting COA June

18,2016 Coundl Meeting exposing Judge James Clark
https://youtu.be/MXa5aVq LPPI
June 2016 Burke & Herbert Bank - Lying

to me about the subpoena and
today after I had already that he had no idea I was to com
e
had a conversation wìt
h another person there.
https:üyoutu.be/glsnNjOØVko
October 2016 City Council Mee

ting further exposing the corruption in the
Cìty of Alexandria
https:Uyoutu.be/vNKZD42
6Fw
October 2016 - City of Alexandr

ia Council Meeting - These two tapes
show the Financial Questionable activ
https://youtu.be/GaN!8TEzW ity
LIVI
and
The disclosure of the City Corruption
In the finances - Private School $70,000
$400,000 for tennis courts - - for tennis courts - COA funded
the City Paid $1.6 Million
September 2016 City Council

Meeting https ://youtu . be/ lrSIZ
ZoTh7A
Right with Crime - CSPAN - Talking

about the Corruption with Judges
httpš://youtu.be/IYMGULrTfMO
CATO - Judge Merrick Garland
https ://youtu . be /IVIUoBWrZvQ
February 2016 - The $602,000

SCAM of the JIRC https://youtu.be/poQ6uHhSLXIVI
DSCF0008-The Mortgage Cris

is - Eric Holder Eric Holderandthe SCAM on
https://youtu.be/GjaZ6a--a the American People
RM
L'bc,!-OC)·'12 ( :RV oi :'-'·,l· j ·,1~:«1 i ,

https://youtu.be/IZG004Bovlo
DSCF0047 Citv of Alex

anci,-ie l--:,„ ÍÏ:(.:.tlí~~~·4; í
-r,r :
https://youtu.be/yd9qz2ukE
xE
https:Ü-y~tu.be/OmJ\Ngr~q
f28
DSCF0050 Citv of
A , exeli-
ir.J I'lgj Qgi.i !') C.j ! -v,fl .29.;j.::~Y._.'~.,t ,* ,
https://youtu.be/cqjSDcH .I ',
GS3c
E,@Ç.F.QO-51_- ~ ÊÎ .81.@
,¿.·: ' í., , 3..·..· . 4..jgi
https://youtu.be/qGav
oOLE-cRY
https://youtu.be/2
qA c_YqdVUw
3
DSCF<)056 Citv oý AÍ:);·:,V·'ri.'' < ' ',
https://youtu.be/2qAc-Yqd\/Uw
https://www.voutube.com/watch?v=p,9(,Dô!.Ii-1
118}_)<I\4 City of Alexandria $602,000 Scam Coun
Feb 2016 - https:üyoutu.be/poQ6uH cil Meeting
hSLXM
hltps://www.voutube.com/watch?v=G
DZBUkjvl'81 Cato Question where
to go for Help with Sydney
Powell-Llcensedto Lie- On July 25,2
014 Janice Wolk Grenadier asked "Wh
when your Due Process rights as an ere cio you go for help
American Citizen are violated?" You
will be shocked by the answer
https://youtu.be/GDZBUkJv/81
We send young men and women into

harms way to fight for rights that we
Citizens. It is very scary and until you are no longer have as American
involved in a Slippery Slope of the Collu
the Judicial System - it is diffi sion and Corruption of
cult to understand.
The entire event can be heard

at http://cdn.cato.org/archive-2014
/cbf-...
Read more at:
• JAMJustice.ora
• www.ProSGA,i,elica.nat
o @ProSeAF,-,
a Fnoehcol'<.e,i,p ,~T hnf,v#5:·

. : ·B,M.M
»>
..*
i'*Ce.u'OO~~.CO,d' ~~/'~'-' 6,í•~-
uüu.Ï 25'lë¿':é·, · ,€·:,~~;,~.
o wv,w.Pi'OSU.4*i r„:.·rbc:z.Ijí
lú.0::l~'cí·.,·:<.[, :
That the law Is very clear : That Judg

e Clarks actions have turned back time
. Giving me less rights then a slave .
someone under Title 42 US Code 1994 Taking
and Title 18 US Code 1581(a): Whoever
holds or returns any person to a cond
PEONAGE, shall be fined under this title ition of
for imprisoned not more than 20 years
or both. That on October 22, 2014 I
placed in jail for failure to pay legal fees was
in 30 days which is a violation of my Thirt
involuntary servitude, except as puni eenth Amendment "Neither Slavery not
shment for a crime where of the party
shall have duly convicted, shall exist
United States, orany subject to their within the
Jurisdiction". Furthermore the right
Involuntary Servltude violating by placing me "under" a state Peonage
the Fourth Amendment right /
by malicious prosecution, false
unconstitutional arrest . This viola [mprisonment and
tion of my Eight Amendment Right
as to Excessive Bail which in this case
"Restltutlon Bail" which further show constitutes
s the knowledgeable malicious inten
November 4th. 2014. Bias, Retaliatio t to silen ce me till the election was over on
n and Retribution to further line
the Lawyers pocl<ets by Judge Clark
.
Further: The system Is one whe
re the Lawyers and judges have
set ìt up to protect each other
with Cash. and line each others pockets
December 2015 - Defenda

nt Janice Woík Grenadier Stan
ds up and speal <s out against
Dawkins in Regard to his re-a the Criminal Acts of Judge Nola
ppointment - In front of the n
Courts of Justice in the Virginia
also stood up and spoke out Leg islature - Seve ral other Victims
about the criminal actions
of other Virginia Judges Cou
Officials / Lawyers who rts of Justice A group of Elec
practice in front of the ted
se Judges
VOTED ALL JUDGE'S BACK

INTO THERE POSITIONS KNO
WING THE CRIMINAL ACT
S & ACTIONS OF THE JUD
GES
4
The Professional Code of Respo
nsibility of the Lawyers on the Court
sof Justice Rule 8 . 4 Misconduct Itis professional
misconduct fora lawver to:
(a) violate or attempt to violate the

Rules of Professional Conduct, kr,ow
ingly assišt or induce another tc do
or do so through the acts of ano so,
ther;
(b) commit a criminal or deliberate
ly wrongful act that reflects adversely
on the lawyer's honesty,
trustworthiness or fitness to prac
tice law;
(c) engage In conduct involving dish
onesty, fraud, deceit or misrepre
sentation which reflects adversely
lawyer's fitness to practice law; ort the
The Courts of Justice further - GUA

RANTEES THE JUDGES against com
plaints being investigated by HAN
ŠELECTING THE JIRC { The Judicial D
Inquiry and Review Committee
where complaints are filed agai
and never investigated - Read Mor nst Judgeš -
e at www.proseamerica.blogspot
.corn the $602,000. KAM on the
Citizens Virginia
Guaranteeing all Judge's the abilì

ty to ignore the law and rule to
protect their own and es judge
very clearly to his good friend Clark stated
Attorney Michael Weiser
" 1 HAVE NO CHOICE BUTTO LET

HER OUT OF JAIL , l AMI SO SORRY
I CANNOT COLLECT YOUR LEGAL
YOU" FEES FOR
The Appearance and the collusion

is that al ! Judges in the State oý Virginia
have a Secret "Handshake" oý " You
Scratch my Back, lwill line you pock
ets with WINS ìn the court room for
your Clients - Call me - Buy me Lunc
or Dinner or what ever - but, we h
will not turn on our own "
So what about those young Men

and Women who go off to war to
fight Ýor the Rights our Ccnstìtuti
Americans of Due Process? on Give ' s
www.Valaw2010.blogspot.com
www.Scribd.com/Virginlalaw

https :// www . scribe!. co ,),/ dv ;'
30350 .5 (536 ./ Rh : c, t:ìr, c
}·· Z -·,·-. 1 . Ci . ..:.-': '..53 .: C , .-:·:.:, h .. .
'-> . , :.
Documents the Back up the Claim
s:
https://www.scrlbd.com/doc
/303508177/US DC-VA-Exhibit
s- for-Rico-Racl<ering-J an-6-201
This picture/ email says It 5
all:
F, o"'. é~v...'. '...:*'.*"

I
C. t t, •., A'',1. -
.
S. Mohstn Reza ' TROUTrvlA

N SANDERS
LLP
5
Law / Code Description
United State Constitution Amendment I The Ftrsl Alnendmenl guarantees freedoms concerning religion, expression,
assembly. atid the íight ro petition. It forbids Congress from òoth · ' '-: . .
[Religion, Speech, Press, f·CÝL,g'= w!:,_Ls·'.ÍÌÍSL.k and also --:,v..: ·'p ' · 'C.." . .5. ' ·,; / v ··.
Assembly, Petition (1791)] =jjíik'}. It guarantees 'isíor:-: 2 f &..:., e:..ú~c", by prohibitíng Congress from
(see e>.,ulanobori) Fesmcling the press or the ri®ïs-oñiìójvidualsto speak freely. It also
guarantees the rigm of Citizens to L.Yf.1 L:. Ç '.''E., 3 ' ! --i _-' .'_ J: ~!' 2-- --:
Amendment ÍV ,rc :.UCE ...
. C.
The Fourth Amendment originally enforced the notion thal -each man s home
is his castle". secure from .,í »- --·1: 3:íj ..fí. L.. ~, 3 ..'_...Å: ... ·t~ ofproperty by
the government. It píotects against aroitraty . . '_.. and js the basis of tile
law regardìng j-š:i:I.í',¿ f,?, ]].' , '.~1 .-- .--.- , safety inspections, _ry.:.
¿ ,".'r' ·r 5cl]--' :+::P' M·: as.'/ell as being central to many other criminai
law topics and tô, I L~ .,··.,·
Fä!11 Ameidnïø:'t [Grand The Fifth Amendment creates a -j-L"·IN. _Ú,··-i' relevant to ootiì criminal and
Jury. Double Jeopardy, civil legal proceedings. liì .._.-Spr:'.'-f.:, the Fifth Amendment guarantees the
Self-lncrimination, Due Mght to a És,i! 1_, forbids "Anlt:Ui¿.ÌY)1,' and protects against çis-
Process (1791)] rr!*T,in':*':. It also reqilires that 'j4.t -y.:.(ÍÇ-f...,5,1' be part of any
(see ialik:1121 c,· , proceeding that denies a citizen lìte, ììberty or Dropeíly and reüuì:'es lhe
government to compensate cit:=ens n,hen it :.- ! fci public
use
V1 The Sixth Amendment guarantees the rights of crlmlnal (jeíendar,ts, including
the right to a public trial . .~. t
'.:' .- ll,e .,a. :-· ·1·.·.t .j ..:·,aijdme.
.
1 /r-
/..1
r,cn Fiì: [Criminal j,--and the nature of the charges and evidence against you. It has been most
Prosecutions - Jury Trial, visibly tesled in a series of -:.,s·,-: ~'-,,¿! / '·(: I;r ,·:: -·, but much more often
figures in cases that involve (for example) jury selectiori of Lhe protection oí
Right to Confront and to
witnesses. including victims of sex crimes as well as witnesses in need of
Counsel (1791)]
protection from retaliation
(see l:Ý:lj!.ß.UUf
Vll pt · ·'. '
J.:'I X
·'1!J_1 f,1, '1,2.:: [Common
th:, :·,1~t:,·d Stgt.5. 'jio,·i :.c'·.·or·.ing t,; tn. ··,ij-T : f Ti· :. ,·,I'./ùtl Jr..···
Law Suits - Jury Trial
(1791)] (see L Ilf:--:'Ìt':-" '
The Seventh Amendnient continues a practice from English j.'„, ~ ': of
disbnguishing -- ". 1.", which must be tried before a (DDsent -'.- by
the parlies) from claims mid issues that may be neard Dy 2 2:O.Re. it
only governs i: g--_y, 41- -1anc has no application to civíl
couíts : . i:.- .
.- ,:/ , · uhen Ilioseccurts are hezrinç only disputes oí '.
Vll¿
Í'_í':r,5~*3'C! [Excess Bail

Most often mentioned in the context of the : .i,._: k':ý-J :, the Eìgþth
or Fines, Cruel and
Amendment prohibits cruel and unusual punishments, but also mentions
Unusual Punishment
"excessive fines and ý.ir. The .': :.:.-': ·'e :, -: . c.,>·g _ surfaces (amorg
( 1791 )] ( see ïü ý.·.·.Vjb
·- oznerplaces) jncases OL.':/'U,-, J : - ., foí exšmQIU yhefì
prooertv is :·-,-».. , tz":· -~r·,n :,,
3
6
IX 1,: C t: It.. Í 4..
Enumerated Rights The Ninth Amendment was : .iì~t.,si-4:

1.2.1]i..·' *f -,~ :·v to ensure that the 3!i-1:·
(1791)] (see l:12'lla'2*Jl) Í' c .* was not seen as granting to the peopl
e of the United States only the
specific rights it addressed. In recent years
, some have interpreted it as
affirlning the existence ofsuch unenu,nerat
ed- rights outside those . I. · :..
>:9:j,ft·t by the Bill of Rights
X
1''lé :l'0'."*'s "O· ·19130 ?t.ef t '. Ih,3 '..' ·r:!tc:ù Ö IE·&. '] ,·-,- '- --' '. '' - '
1,
UIÌLLUC'.- · .íí' 1
[Rights
Reserved to States or rey:cecl:'.·e!',. or [o !:ie t,èc:L:!.3.
People (1791)]
The Tenth Amendment helps to define
(see §,z.,Iÿboftl~iì the concept of Íp.Cl:*.g!, tile
relationship between Federal and slate
governments, As Federal acüvity has
increased. so too has the problem of recon
oling state and naticnal interests as
they apply lo the Federalpowers _ü_,
. .. g-- ·. and to regulalions such
as 1.·Jt_ä 1'1· ¿ 'LL disclosure of person
al Information In recordkeeptng
systems, and '-,zs «j -., :·'
·:7 Q. i.: ,)'
Amendment XIII Section 1
C wü Rbhis Neither slavery nor involuntary servit

ude, except as a puníshment for crime
whereof the party shall have been duly
convicted, shall exist within lhe Unjted
iúíçí'Z~güi.I.FI·:7·~eí States, or any place subject to their jurisdi
ction.
Section 2.
Congress slìall Iìave power to enforce this amcle

Dy appropriaïe iegslatloiì
Fozillcci]Ili Amendment - he Foudeenth Amendment addresses man>'
aspec:s of c,tlzenshiß and the
rjghtg of Citizens. The most cômmônly used
-- and frequently litigated --
phrase in the amendment is "eq;.iai Diot:cticn O' t, ~, e ~e:.'5", whic
h figures
prominently in a wide variety of landmark cases
. includìng Eís'..,115:Çëlg-
*bý.ù zi (racial discrimination), Ç't,>..· -213-G
'Nreproductive rights). - z«
Lú,-5 (election recoljnts).Fe--· .·. - ::i,·-·Ž (gender
discnminatjon). and ¿ ',·i#:':·'
lì'Íjú!]Í'1'.'[.!-' 1.i':1. i (racial quotas in
education). :i-:." "-
Amendment XIV
Section 1,
All persons born or naturalized

in the United States, and subje
ct to the
jurisdíction thereof. are citizens of
the United States and of Ihe state
:v lie t'ein
tney reside. No state shall make
or enforce any iaw which shall
abridge the
pnvileges or immunmes of citize
ns of the United States, no'
shall :nv state
deprive any person of lífe, Ilben
y, or property, vvíthout jue
process of law: nor
deny to any person *ithin its
Jurisdiction tne equal pro:ection
of [he laws,
Section 2.
Repíesentatives shall be apportione

d among the several states eccording
their respective numbers, counting to
the whole number of persons in
excludjng Indians not taxed. But when each state ,
the right to vote at any election for
choice of electors for President and the
Vice President of ihe United States.
Representatives iii Congress, the
executive and judicial oñicers of
Ihe members of thelegisíature there a s:a!e, or
of, is denied to an, of the ·.. ¿ inhab
of such stale. _:._. .: ,L itants
,~ ~,~ , . ,~~, ·· ~ ai,d citizeits cf tne United State
or in any abfjdged, excepf fót participation s.
m íebelííotî. ûrother crime. the
basis of representation therein shall
be reduced in the propoí{,on whic
- numbeí oí such male cítizens h the
shall beâr to the whole number
of male citizens
twenty-one years of age in such state.
Section 3.
No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of

President and Vice President, or hold any office, civil or mílitary. under the
United States, or under ally state. who, having previôusly taken an oath, as a
member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of
any state legislature, oí as an executive or judicial officer of any state. to
support the Consütulion oí lhe United Slales, shall have engaged in
insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the
enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds oí each House,
remove such disability.
Sectíon 4.
The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including
debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties fc, services in
suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be quesvoned. But neilher the
United States nor any stale shall assume or pay any debt or obligation
incurred in aid of insurrection or rebellion against the United States, or any
claim for the loss or emancipation oí any slave; but al! such debts, obligations
and claims shall be held illegal and void.
Section 5.
The Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the

provisions of thìs ailicie.
Bill of Rights l. Freedom ofspeech

2. Freedom ofworship
3. Freedom from want
Virginia State Constitution Virginia Article I. Bill u f Riglit,

A DECLARATION OF RIGI-ITS iìiude b>· the 6;Ol,J pcc,pie „(Virginia ill tlìz exei:i.e Ot thcir
sovercign powe,3. u hìch right, do pe t-(üin ui lhe nl .t,id t hcir pc) slel-it>'. .,5 t he b:tsi:; ar.d fp Li iicial ion o l'
govei·ninent.
Kectìoi, 1. Equnlitr unil ri~htf oí n,en.

r 'hul L ,/l IICI 1 L , J ·L' hy ilcmire Ctfl , C#lh · frcc Líf ,C/ 1, t < lcf ' C , ÌLN' ttt Ll , kl i, i ,\·e c crni i , i i „ h;:·:, i ! rtg ;if.~ .
et- ijitlol , /,\· lul \' c {' j ) j~ ),- lci . tj ).'}:' ptbl :" }'y :
p,trs„i}Ig w,úl ohiai}iì),g hc,i)1,i;ie~., Lmd s:Ger\'.
Sectiol, 2. People the source o f i,o,; er.

77,c,/ C/// /7(1,1'C, ix vc.wedi/1, L„,L~ :t,I/.,L'qi,cu//; ./.'I·ii c:/ fr„/,t, ,/,e pe, y)/e, //,a, /11,/,ei.,//'a/.'., </i'c' //,ci/·
1/ 7/.Vi'ex lílld SCI'\'l,tlth, Cíllij d Ull litlll'.'t (Ilj}Ct[(.1~k' bl 1~Il'jl}.
Section 3. Goi ernment instituted for er,mmon beiìefit.
'Ihat goi 'enimem is, oi · ottgh , (o he. i , ìxti !, i ted f'o ,· me e< ì )] ïij ,cm he , icíit, proicciit „j . aikl svct , jij>' *,j ílk
people . MNÍ{ ül . or c {) 1] ljlltijljjv, oj QN dìe Vlirt<,i !\ ij ]{ jttc , ií ] Ìlt 1 < Jll ]?\ < lj '¿(,# Ci 'jllììcil !. 11?.!1 j.< he., t whk·/,
/x capah /e I,fp„, Lh ,L ·i , ~g // jc ' g,·c „ k.v c /e,wie : i ,/ /, L ,vlt , i):'.*, L , i , t / ., L ,/ et ,. L ,//(/ i~# //,„.,/ i '// ~ ' L „,v// 1 '., ec· tired
agvj )).Nt Ae Lhli }ger qf muhldmiNi~11 ution .· and. whcl )
~ '~ ' ei · ilnv '., I () ~ '
ej ' t ; 1 ;, etlt .çjì~IN hc líilll )(i i}]¿ IJC(plulc
<,t' conti ·&.·\' m the.~e 1 ) 111 ·puse.j . a mqjl ) t -jl\· qt t/w ci ,1 ))/ ~iltnit \' j}(, fjl „j , 1 /,ij/ jj, i /( tj~/e, il~it~, e, jt , hic. .,nd
ij ,de.fecls ihle j ·ighi m reft , 1 ·m. dher,,„ uh,) lish it. in xtleh ji }itmle,- tt.N .vhi , ll hc ilkl>!ctl I )1„Si et)! lihici\'e
/o Ijw /)1[hljc wCaL
8
Scctio,1 4. No excltlsi,e Cilioltl:,Irnt, (jr
~) 2'i~ilcgc:,; offic'LN. t,(;( ¢L) be het·çdit.i:'1.
l /}a ' liu Ilklit. (> r *N I.4 tîicll , I.\ CIÌ { iíled tl ,
l'. Vl '/¿/.f h 'l' ( jr SÇ )')~Í/'J /l ' L '/ Ilíj~ / Í/// C ///.3 Or ili ) 1 i /i 'ges /j 'um //w
ümmwllit\'. b, tî m cn } l.çi~jc }·Cf~i, t , Ì ofp~hlk , ~¿ üjn ·it.· e~ : .· j, ~~ · jt )"' t hci ,) g J: rcei , Jihle, iwhh: r , ,( íght rhe
q#k'C'.Ç (f /,tc/gi,Ï//WA', /C,MBAÍÍ,)/, Ím.//Í{(b /(, /'>C ACTCMA// i,
Section 5. Separatiozl of legi,il:,tire. erec,itive. ancl judicial (Iei,artme,its: i,erioilíed elections.

lh ,,/ /he /egi , /, m' re. exec,,/j i ·c , „/ k 4 //, /ichd de~ „ /. 7 /„ euh ql /h c ( '(,/, z N ,(, í i H L u //// ,//(,/,/d bc Yctk /.' ,// l '
j )(,/'/ il ' ij, u / ill,g /he hij / the , ls (,/ / hl' /, ei ,j ,/e , / hcr s/l , mk /, m /:< t·' i / peri , I ,/ç , /, e ,· cc /uced /„ i , prir, f / c
swtic, I . i ·e „„·i imn thi , t hc,cly íi '0,;, w/uch t /, cr were
~ (, 1 'igi, Iiìlh ' tlt~~L'll, Wtd tl}C
hy ruglil ·tl· electiu , tv . iii which uli „ r ai ,\ pç,[ t „t ! hc fi , Ì '! it :r !, ic , ìihe ! ~,

xlîctll 1.c a,<uiíi ehg, lìlc, or
ij¿L'/i,L,ih/e, a. lhe /,nrs mm' ch/'L'c/.
Section 6. Free elections ; consent ot' í: uverned .

Thut üll e/eeri<,i,G
c,ug/u to bc /ì·ec , clitd mc,t aU nîeli, hin·ittg xtll./Ìciei}t c)'ic/el,cc
{'t permulleì}l
ct)})1})1,)1) i)1:Ct'Cst with, alkf illtt}L'11))1(í}1 l{), lhe c<,illilìtl):i f\·, lìcl\·C thc 1 ighl (4 hliflj'i.ti~C. :mll C,Il))}I)1 he
Íuxed, or Llepl'ive,1 (il, or dumagl·{Í Ilì. ÍÍ}C,r l)„,l)eríy j,ir public
ìixcš. $1'ilhOÌN Ij}c'i1'' ,)\\M C,1/ìhcilt, f );
{/i~,t (lf' tlleit' i,L'/)/i'si'/mtt/i'c., Lh,/1 c/ccwd, ti/' /,í,m,,(/

/)1' i/¿n' /:itt /,t ti/tirh rbc.1 h. /n //,,/. //, /iÁ-i
/ik,imei'. :t.Fwiì íccj 14 Ii- the pi íhlk· ,-, i,,Lt.
Section 7. Lnws shozild not be suspei,drd.
l'hltt uli powe}' <d Sltspefltli,!g 1(,ws, or }jìe e.\-ect,tì<1)] <11 liíwx, hy rl)1\- iiì{Ih,bl'tt\ , \1'ilh,ml -·„11.cijt "j the
mmrj,)!IS 1,} ftleil· 1-il,~11!s. J)1tí <)1,(*i )1,), !,; 1·~e C.\'L'f 'l' / Ýe:/.
See'tion S. Cri,ni,I:,l proseen,tions.
Í'haî Hì CÌ'itlli)]Ui prnxccmjonx ¿1 l)?till jï~!?j) a rp¿ht ,(~ Jcmaud t/ic ln'il It:,/,íl'.' ,~ /?'x Nc,·1",C/tj,·,1),
m he co,I/)·i,i/tecl wWi die t/C'C X/X'('/I# illg ~ 1 m /c'.ï t' #. Wkl W cttll Í{H' Cudc//cc /// h/\ fmy,i . .i)/t//'29 .,ha//
am
CI}jt}y die ri ,jh, t ,) , I .V ,Ce.iy j p , fhik· ,rk,1, hy c,n m,p, tf ·Ii, Il ì ,I ;-~ ,,1 m ': rtcit :~tgc. i:), hf ,Itl whc ,xe
zi//c„,i//,vt/.,· c·(,/isc/// he cm,//ci, be tí;,u, ~/:y,j//ì . .t/<' x//,í// m,/ /)e,/(·/)/-/~v,/,)1 /d¿,,)/' /ibe//i:
2.v.,·p/ />t
Ihc h,w (,/'tj,e Il,Illi t,I' Ilíc i¿ICI'Zjlìct,1 •,Í' f]1 , j,eci'.\, jl, )1' h: l. ~~) j}1;)CI;CJ Iii ,I, iy crblmlth J))'1 )il'C, jil,g m Új\'C
9'1 'h/C,I,C'L'
Uxaij,s, hi,n.wlt, nu,· he tm, twicc in ie,)í)(i,·d,\ hn' (/w NC/,I,e ,~(teit..C.
Lau:ç mar he el k,c I e'i 1 pro r k li „g ,joi' f l,e u· iü l t?/'í)//è/¿.çl'S

i#(,I,Íeloi,ic,t,x hy Ll culll·i u, " (,t',i-ecord
wi, h,m , Murv, prexer\'illg the right W tile (tccjtsell m
uu appet,l t,) #d ct Irjl,j byjun' ) 1} Mmw C{)11)'t
ot reci)1'd huïjjtg t)}'igijkti cl'il}li,tctl jltl'js~ljci j<)íl. Lan , il,uv
uho provide /ktr jtlrie# Coll.#Ìxl jítg (,/ /exx
thu /,/ f t ,·e/i ·c. bm íi,), kv ihaíì N \'c. fur Nìe iriaj ojl <, Nc ' j }, eç ) 1 ,] t , 1 c' li , ni , ilt~ ,. tija ,)). t \ ,
k / V , jh .'// eh i ·,/xcx ,
ulìd prewrjbc dic j, u 1)1/,i'r ot pu'<,r.# Mr each ühtß,
hi crkiiilizür cukj.
tile (ICC'}1!wd may j,leiíd gliìlt>·, jl the ucct,sed plead „,)t :ü,ìllv.
IÏ: ,}kty, \.ith Iiif
Cint\et U Llt kf Ihe ct ),k'1¿t'/'CI}Ce 'Jl fjle ( 'i)#) Jj);,1)/1\'L'Lljí I)'.i . 1 F?Í)1·Jk'1' l,i ki { Jj l Jlc cí)1 jl-Í et);e,·e,t nl )'ec< 4·( j. hi'
tried hy u b„iülle,· wai vc :, ittl\. l.
o·ü.se oj.,i,L·lt ji,Ii,ej· :,r pli·Li „t'Kiíjlb , ,/ìe
1 he pri
Section 8-A. Righrç of r ictitng <,t' crime.
• / hat i/r L / i„li/tc,/ Ij/'(içecmi, ,#/1, ///e

ric/i/1) .ç/19,// /,f' L,L ü ,„kvi tai/'I/css,
,//,<,i In· c,i,(/ /·e.Vic·c í b,
/he t,//ic'et'x. e,j,ph,1·cc.< lì; ¿Li
"1»Ihe Commou\Ve,11(h u,ld ih p,)1{tic
ul Mihd{YINÌoji.i Œill
qf/he c„m·/x au,/, „x mc (jcncrul .l,vmh/y u~o· ddi//l' u//Jpnn
idc /n, hm, mur be
( tcco}·cle< i i 'tgjìtf m ret {, I „ l', I h |e ll , It i ll})1 } Ì i ,1 ÌI ' Itltc 11111 ìl 'l~. I j l/( 11 ] 1 k , I l l }l l . ,~ ,
. l
U 1 '. ~L '(. C. U ( r, c/
fl { Cü{ 1 {Iltitd loíc m {< ic cí '{ Ilmllíí lìf\ Ilcc
l l # il l : l ~i ì . ] IJ 'l ) 1e {.' I ll )))
pj '(,CC~ \ Í ÍÌChc' t 'jt{ Í) 1 \ Ì)1( IV jììclildc,

hut m,t (ìe Íi,Ìijteií t<,. the fi,líc,z, it,>(:
o /. 77,e
t'jght tt) pr{}tect MH.Irom /lll·tlïer ll~ll'1,} ot' reprisul lj}l~(,ltglt
tlte ilt~~)(Jiítioiì ~4
Ltl,i,n,j)1'i&„e bi,il i,ikl condititit: „f iclectxc
:
o 2. l/,c rig/1, /u he /rei//e,/ wi/h /'c's,[,ec/, ci¿.::////1' (,//l~/l/i/'He.,x t// aü #,ctt,~e., ,//,#c· .7 ,///,/wl
/'//Ç//cc .$'1 .ÿtc/,1.·
0 3. t/tc' /·ig/)/ /, j (K/d,r.u the t i/'LNN viít/'I

,// ///e tit~/e .*C/t/ ~'/ t~~,' i.i
/tt,ict»wd
o 4. Thc right in receirc ümelv m)!ilìiuh,)}1
r,f bjdieiül í)1'(,L'e.,lill~-~.~:
o 5. / h.
*hi 1(, }C\UNÍMUN:
c L.Hw }')!új)1 It3 1'~e ~, ~j'.~i.>c,1, ~) rdAMe fi·,m, i, ~·.

i~,~l> „,· c, ~·., i~c ~, j íl~~. „fi~. ~, ~íci. 2,.{ieíjï~,~i
9
be/i,rc <,r idic,· cli.Npu.,ili,m: u„d
c 9 Thc "ÌHI„ %, (.·,,
liter wj,h rh. l,Í t 'Nccltl¿(,11.
N,ix H··c/i,m ¿h,cx
,~ ÍIÌ') ì1\' lit!\ (/cc 1\/í,/l i// u L·/·/mma/
Ilt,t Cl,Illej' 1{(,t,ji ijjj)· per'·„,l (l /'ight ,{, ~t~,l}Cul ~~.
prijccetlìlìg. t & ) es ììt if üht·idge
:tlïy of Ilcì' I'jglït gzícij'.ltltccd l ,7 f 1}c ('<}ji~~!i
f ttfi~,tl of thc l 'ìllícd AILIÍC>~ t}r
/hb C o //,/ i / t#io//. amt ( Iüe.A m )1 cri'aje
li),y cil ! 1 ,;e (,) ~~ljl'JI !] j ) fi ))' l ' Í~;))¿.)Ujj \ ~ ,1 ¿/)) j ,·~)' ¿ k,)) l~t~~e:, ¿,gc; i ); sj lj)c
Comm,),Iweajth t,I· L,íly (,j'it\ i), Ililicuj >Ifhdh™,„I:, f,it\· , ,lttl'Cr, Cjj}i)1,,\'Ce , „· .üg:~1¿ ot t.l,e
(Pllili)1(Jl}i,ei,1! h or C,iìy ,)1' ií.· l)(,lil icf,I .,lthdivi, j,tjth, I,r uny qftìcer
qf tile U,m'f.
Tj,e ctjllelldnie , tt i -:ilifhkl Ni , i ·enihei · 5. ll)9 (, . ti kl ej/ecji \'.·, Ji ,iltti , i ·y j . jvz)-'--, 4* I, lccj u ttd~; :icth,( i (,N-
.lL
Section 9. Prohibition of exeessive bai! Rnd fines,

cruel and nmtsi,nl ptitlisltment. $1!Spensiüai oi'
Imi)ens col·p:is. bills of:ittninde·v: m,d ex post fncto ]:,#v.

Hkií e.,-L·esçire hai/
(nlghl ",){ 1(} he }.C<itm·eli, 11{'ì'
ij)To>i''i. il'1! ül{CÝ dlr·.4 Ì'illf.Niìcit
I )! ltli,X /mîc, HX in #/cíed: Í /?a ? thc /)/' jvj/ etr t )1 thc writ nf hahea.ç
cnr/ ms sha // m ,í he , Hv~el ! ikd jmkg
wheit. m üf ijt, itjhji, or i chel;i,m, Uîc ptt/i/jc i'cquit-e, .I,ttt tl}~Í Wic (I{.il:r,il
.·ls.Çemhlv «ill m )
1 jìafx cíìjy hjjl c } jc ,! Ictjl } der. or c ,jn : r i >„: 1 facm hn \'
Section 10. Geiteral ),arranis of je;,rctl or seizure

prohibited.
7 hw geue /, d M 'U / i ·,n , 4 it ·hcrchì · Lm UHÍCCI. <) 1 / NCX., L'//,!ÓC /" // kf 1
j )/aces 1~ ' i,/im ,/ e, li, A'„ ce (,/ 4 / t < t¿·/ g , i /,//, ji / ied. ,, ~ · /„ ,,· ~ ,
iz„ c ,//,ìpe/ Iï¢,// (, ipe /·.„'/ i.% //, H Icí /ne ,/, (, r it '/1 ( J jc
'
01*/, SL' is ílt } t )}Ctl 'ítcttlltliy
LIC.VL /' il} C ¿I t / 1 /.1 . Ï /q )1 )01 '/¿'Ll hi · C,ì ' i</t , jli 'L'. , t /·t , ,„,)· iel ' c ),1 , : 1,¿,/ (,i), i ·cçfi, v, Lmd
ottglîí í 1< il la Iì: tij'Líittcd.
Section ll. Due i),·oiess of 1,„,·: ohlìx:~tioti ,;f cimt,·:ic: j: t:t]~íilg :,r cl:~îiönging o:' jirivgte
propert, : prohibited disc,·imin:itic,$1: jtir> trir! in c,4 i! c,ìses.
T/Iül Ii<) pcrs<>,ì s/w// l,e f/i'i), ivi·(hìf l,is life, 1 j/,e}*n'. t)}' pri,l,el'ty witl)<mt ill,C pr,Ï~ es.\ , ,t law: il,at the
(iene/i// .Jxsen,b/i· shall ìi)4)airing tlie t,Í,lig,ítji)11 (lj cl>jjlruc,s: w,(1 111&,t tile í'ighl Il}
he. free . 1'1 '(,m
cmy g,)1'emme„ tc, I tljsej ·imi , ki, ic),; : ip,)„ / jlu hct.~t.# ,)/ ,·e / igicmx e'<, ilvje , i ,),}, ruee, c ,)/111·,
xex, (j/' jiutiallul c,tigili
Slìi{11 tlot he ,<htklgcd, eiüy)/ //tü// /he
i/tc/e .iqev//„// €/ /hc Sc.ïc.,- d/¿/// //tv
he coux}clei·ed clisci'i tnilì< I,J,ilì.
Tliut * cnmr, n·er.ýiex rc.,110.c -ti , ìg prnpej ·/ v. uud m
xt , i /< he/ wecu m.m cm</ mali , tril ;/ hy pu -\' ix
pl'Ul'ßvMC tl, i,/her, wk/ í,ti'.¿/)% t„ be hc/ií .ç~/ ~~/'
e</. J/,c (,'eueral .-,.ý,embh· ))/,/, hm// t/lv' mml/,e/' qt
case., j/, crm/· A, ( jt /'ec 'c ),·d /,) m ,/ /e.ü- / hcí ,/ tire.
Nu,/ the (;e/,cr.,/ .1.:.cmbh· i/,a// I)„... i„, /,nr ·,vh:,·cb.r prh·a/c ft,yqt:, n .
me , t,Li't ,", ul/ic/i A
Wndume,ilal. sl}it!1 he Jum,tged or mkcu cxcept fìit· piíhl ic ti.\e. N„ pnvalc propertv
>Iì~,!l hc datììaged
o ,· ra/:en ün · p uhlic / /.' L ' „'ifhom jlr: f L 'fi #) ~j , e „ xulj,)„ m
ihe ow , wr ihcv ·:,) 1 . X ,) m „ J ·e j )#* ivu ¿, c prriliern ·
/Jko' /le mkeu //k,/l /tece.,sa,1' /<) ,/l'hie\'c //ie sm/eifjll,h/it· use. .//i.ç, L'I)/JI/)e,1.5,//jou xhaH /,c /J,) /V.v,
Ukm
the rulue i :1 lhe properr kiTzen, I{).Fi j,rt)1 jl.F a)}d It )>:l
Ltt ] J Lkl !} Ii { ŽC ,\ t ,) lhe re\ 5 ( ilie ci ; 11 .Çed
hr /hc
tiìkmg. The letmx "It , v [)1 '(}lilA " Lil ,il "1{ k.x ]
W'/-l'k'L'
A public Cnmptm\·. j)11~'~Ie Nen'k·l· c(,I'j~{)1'iíti,)11. ,);· raijr,;ad i'.\-C'/L/k'5' //lc jhnlv/- tì.1 e,nulem
lìt}Ilìaijì Ihr puhlic Ií'<e wllcm xîlcl) cxcrcìxe k foì' tlïe
ilìltlj,},ted provjxìt)! ~ (}f tlíiji[\ u}ì)mìt)1) CLÍI'1'iüî',
M· rui//·cjc,d xc/·\·il'us. Ij; ,<11 4,dwr c,i.L'Ç. i,
//XC
if dw prim,i, .v use iS A,1·
prin,IC gc,ht. l,li,Lttc heuc.m, I)1 l\2/te eitel'j)1 l\L', jí,creu>,ilìg juh>.,
ijig mx re\·enli:, t,/· <:, iii„,Iìi,· Jc,2·lt,ptlictif. i'.,¿, L·i,f f,ìr :/Ie c'Íií}jmmu}i, i}f u Puh/ì'c ÍN/jjti"L'i'
eviçti , 4 . mi the
l)'Y ,I , CI 'l \·. Thc Ccili, lç' 1 ] Ìltí : r heift ·\ thi· hm -ile ) 1 (,1
í ) 1 c )\· Ii ;g { 1)uj I 1)e il.„ e ).~ j )11)', 1 ie. wljhc, tí ;
a p'CS'11)}i)1{t W 111.ll H i>..
Ihc a„k'//ch,/ct// t'L//(tie,/.\'orember í), 'U/2, üm/e#L'L·/i\·c ./,/imarr j, 2/)13 /,) //k· /jcc,Lh'ijg Itfi/w
seem nj , utter "t , tk} ng ", ( ICILICJ
"<, i ' {. ki /li.,gmg ". Ïìl j ,urclgi 'c ,ph { mc , uftcr "Coi ,tl '(.{CI:~ ". tl: lcled
". 1 ,(, t Cí ,Iy
/hc icrm
'puhlk· uxe.ç ' /o he de/i/lell
h, f/,L (iw,era/ .·IÇNe)/,/,/.1'", . tc/i~i'd o i.1," pm'L,gmp
/i ,(t,ei'
pa}'agrc,l)1, two.
Sectio:112. Freedom ofspeech and of

the p,·e~; r.igi,t pi·nce:ibly ko ns.sembne.
8::d to petition.
be restl'ailwd except hy dexl),ji ic gover,Iti,e,w.$: tliu,

c,it~ Liti:e,I ijki.f lt'ee/\- speuk, write
,·ai,d 1),thlixii
hi.ç SC'/,/ i /neua
(m üll st,h/cc /S, /'L' i/ lg i Cxj , titi, ih /c / iw · thc aht , xe ( d fhat ,·ìght : tl,~1 , fl,c ( ie, lcrül
.#xsemh/,· .ÿ/kt//
//u/pc/XX ,/jn· /t/"
(Jl))'ijgi/jg ihe frccdc)1}j
m,j tbe )'jlljjj of lhe
j,Cf)/)19 peitceühlv m ü.ïse,nhle , lt)}d t,) pelttiun tlle ,1(Ï\'Urim}Cm 1(}}' Ihu / L'¿// C'.Ç.Ç M Kyaüm'C.';,
10
Section 13. ililiti:I: st,i:iclir,g i:i·inie
s: ti,ilit,iy· st,bc,r·di: :,te fo Cr,il
~ ~)(,\ ~CI',
l'hat a HV// jegtl/.,(elhllillti,1,
Compo,ed uft/ìe l«y ufllic pcuple, Il'(titìed
h, l!1'm.Á, hille prüper,
natlíl'al. úlkl kife defe}1%, (,f d fì'ee >:tclte, theretc
,re, the right qf th: pcnple m kc'ei) i,nd bcar ürms
Jhall m, t he i/ lfri, ìged: that >: l.
ijti /itlg Ltl 'tniek. m mî ,C I , f p:., cc. Nttc , ttl./ hc J ,·Uic /e~i
/ ihe/·/ j ': and / 1#, t m alj c , t.ýe-5 the ji } ijitüry shuì .,A . k¿, i>~crnw: ,c ,
, M he t , Ill /Ct · xtricí v ,/1( jrdil
,L , Ii { Jil t ,}. Li ,} il g,}\-e }·ned hy,
/he c.n.,/ pí,wei·.
Sectio,i 14. Go,ernmeut slio,ild be

uniform.
Tíktl IÍW penple 11( t\'U LI
l 'igm
ll , Ìliì~1~ ) rlì ) tp )\'ei 'Iij~lelll , ( lli~Í, UMVbu
c dìi.[I Iì{) '2, lìknìllkìlt ?, ~1)1ll 'lll('
, trom.
' o ,· i „ del ,e, jilem of, thc
gc)\'Cl Í „ Ìlelll qf ji j '>¿iljil{. ( mglìl
11 ) hl' ereded o !' exlahlj.Çhed wltilìll the
tin,ìtx (hereot
Section 15. Q , ialities nec<· ss :, ry

to preserváti , rn of free goret ' nilien
t.
//kü / U ).//'ec gí , VL 'j -/;/ Ue // l , m , r /he h /c., w , t,p ul /i /, e ,·, i ·, 1 ·Lm hc , 1 )·cse/ 7 · e,/ /„ &/(,· pc·, q ,/ L,, hm hy a, firn ,
i,tlliereiìçe li , jilxtice. 1)1í~ilei·~ilií ,Iì, tcjìit,erance, li i ,gulily , tíjìil \'irme: hr freipiei ]( rec ,<,iuice i „
,/mlt kt/) kl / fü / 1 /,/' it , cil)/ es : w , J itj ihc recci,41
,/ i, m h.ì · i ,// ci / izc~ ,s // ki / //ic, /1 „ ~ · c ~hi / ic., ,;, „ L~,' ,/.,
Lmd dlcll Such ; /,q /')/ ç .
cmmm /le e///,; t~t'(/. çure m a wcw
/ ì · Hi,c ·/'e hnr / x re. v , C ' l '/ C, Awd Ji' le m "occn' /.Ç
C , h.ve, 7 ·UJ
Tji¿tttree govcrjmîcm #·es /$. a , < h , L ·x Itl ), ,/, líle hi·, i , rde \ 1 j ), 1 < xih/ e dilft !.~jnn qfkit <)„/L'il ,.:,',
(tj}J d}ltl c Iw C'<,ml}1(,1,;Vec Íl th ,h,m Id (1 rl, i 1 i,i e 11 ,)1' jh,lse l,Ik, til.c wh icl} nam re hli, x,nvi, xu lihereil ly
amn,W it.Ç pec,p/'C hr as.ït//'i//g thc u/,j,í,Í
//,nity tí,)' ///e,f'./¿j// ~,
çj ,/'i're/í,p/ne/I/ /,r an e/Jcc;,vc rrs/e/jj <4
ech,ccuion Illl'(}1(gholti dle ('l}Iììj]1(H]Weilí
lll.
Sectioai 15-A. ~I:irri:ige.
1-htl{ olily a Iltlil)1~ hel\'A'e)1 (ìlw

}iìan 611)~1 (llìe \~(,
Itia,1 mtiy ]~e ,: 111~,t'1'iaqe rujid ilt UI' 1'CG{)\~111=ecl hv
tlli., ('(„jlim)„wei,1!h ajid il.; p,)1
ilicl,1 stlh,Ii\'ì.\ jl),t.\. J J,¿.\ l '(;1,}illt,i,\,i„lil, tm,1 !,5 l'i,tjJ),C·L,1
hlil'i~~\·i.Niou.~
shüit 11(}Í
crec,ie or ieccigi}ize t, legal stitli{N T{,r relüll{,)1,hip. „f
mi,iurrlcd [iì:Ít~'tdti~tl# 11;il! ilile,td, m
appmxi//J,t,c ,/ic t/C.Ýi,WL q¿laf/ziex. ,/:v/ific,/icc, ,)/ e//bax ,# nk/)'/'i,/:c.
.\ (,i· .,/j.,/l /hi.~ (.ci,/,iji,),t:,c,i///,
ur iís putitical stihclirisiu,ts
clu,/e ur recogilce tli,(,iher imitm, jìlli,J}Civ/}ij). (,r c,jher je:z;li .',Í.##It.\ 1(J
w/i/C// is as'¿itr,lc,/ t/ie i j,ÍZ/)/ç, /h'l,et//F. ,)h/igi,ti,),1:, qi~it/itics. (,r
C/tl'I /Ç oí 1]kln i<.{„t.
The ume/ klti } em
rutìfìcd A '(' lz'„iher 7, 2 „ t , ti . lílll |
ellccjivc , J,imtur.v L 21 jl )7 Added ,# iii·, i .,cuhm
{ l 5-A).
Section 16. Free eiercìse of religion:

no estt,blishm:·1:t of religi(ni.
Thc,/ ,·eligmn ,;,· /he ,/un· whh'/, we owe,„ t,liì· ('j'Cclmr, it,ld Ihc Ijjltlll,('j' td di:c/kir•Zi/}g lj. c,)11 he
Líi)'et.ted
(,n/y hy reels(,ti a,J cuuvictt(jli. t,o{ hy 1{,rce { )#· via/cnce: dl,((. Wet'Cll,l'C. J/1 l),Cu Jt·C ell:l£,l/'\'
emilied lo me free exerci#e (if re/j,zj,),I, dcct),Jitjg
M lhe dk,Ltie., ,)1 cunsü kilce.: at,d jli,it jl 1.% jhe
nmmul Juty q/ dl to pruc; ice ( 'jll'j.<tian lf,rbell)'tlt,Ce, lm'l·, tt)1~~ cj,<Iri,\' Ílm'(.,rd~ Cucj) t),het'. Xt, n?,m
.,/? a // he
coinpe / led lo, tì'eql ,e,„ (,j ' silj,ji , i )·t Lt, n ' religi(, lt., \\'(, rship . place, or
„ li, ti .Sfr,\' \Vhu,5 (,e ,·C· r, „or
.ç/m// he t,n/¿u·ccd. /'cvruiuc,/, mu/eç/c,/.
„i· hm·,/,cunl m hn· nodr m' t,
~(~( ~~A'. /jr~j' .dw# Í,f/,crw/,C .v,//¿'r
OU </ CL " i /. f
(., t ' /1 (x ,-e //g/t , 11.\ (,~ } Iltt <, UN Or ('C /tl'
A /, Ití ,// l ml' li > Ila /l he Írel' ti , /},,)1*'.~ :/,t,/ h '.'
1(, mclitlluitl Iheil' (,1),Il .,¿·:.:/m ?ettl
itlll.\ lil ljlll{!Cí's (jl'1'C
li'diou, L,IÌJ lhe g<tlìle Àjìtjlj
h] jll,\#'IÇC dmlijil:h.
eitlctrl:e. {,1*
u.(Rct t/,elr c j,1/ Cltl,ucj,ics. A,ki me Gcl,crcil ,1.ï.,e,jil)1.j· .~lkil/
„t~/ /~i'c.,cril~c uj,y ruJ j>Ij,)]i., !~/
whwevet·, <,r co,t.lei· ~ijly pecìt/iur j)1'tvileg
ex ul· Lit~\'l{,Illíges t,1, Cijl\' Seel l)1' delll;jlliì
:L{li,u*, /)1' ptt.\\ ll~1\'
Ia\\' reqlíi j'ÌI,g t,r cllilji<il'i:ijlg
awy religi<,I,s ~(, L lely, (,r l he
people uhmy , /iv/riet „ ifhbj du <
( bm / il<, nn ·eak//. m je
\·\· ( m < j;i./} iwh ·cx o /· í ,/ hi '/:5 ,
a , i \' /, t. r k , i · // ie CI 'L,
pill,Jie c)1'®r tj,e xII/,Pc,rt c / 1 ( w nr /'Cpa
ttï,/'Ship, „/'lt!,>· Cltl,1'L·11 ,11' ,}jt{, / i ' qt <(; Iy lic ,
ifsc' ( I ]
ist,n': hì!1 ií X1}Lflj
he teî) lì-ce ic,
w sc/cct his rc/igi,mx i,(.,frlil Ii )1 . li,jd jí) j),LJJW tt,r
hi, . Jjt)1),))'i Ž~¿%c
h 1)rivale ü,mraci
please. ü., h: .,hall
Section 17. Construction of the

Biïl of Righ(s.
The rights e,Ìt,mej
cited in ihix )lili of
I{ ightx xltcill j,t,í /.c
ct Ììivi'iíeil 1, , hmlt
11(,t tho" üthei' rlghR ,)1 tjìe
kill 1*,p/e
C.17 ' i 'L'.Ç.I CC /.
Judicial Canons Judge Clark has ignored the

Judicial Canon's. That Judg
e Clark lost subject matter Juris
May 1 9.2016 whcn pcfc diction on
ndant fuund the Financiü
l contlict and üppilrent
COVER UP included his
11
past law firm and client Burke & Herbert Bunk That Judgc C[itrk
tlwough Bias iwd lüsl p¢r.oiml
jurisdiction over Janice as Dc fcndünt in
thi:i casc and Plaint i ff itì ozhcr Cuses in or around January
2012. Thatthe Codeot'Judicialconduct docsrequireaj
udgc to 'respect and comply with the law"
to "be faithful to the law and maintain professional
competence in it" and :o "accord to every pergoli
who has a legal interest in a proceeding, or that pcrson
's 1¿,wyer. the right to be heard according to
the law". That thc actions of Judgc Clark or not "mere
legal errol'" they are deliberate malicious
uctions to subscrvicnt thc law forhis co-workers, Judges,
lawyers, Eleclcd Officials. That Judgç
Clark has abused any and all discretion due to the appeara
nce of fuiancial äuin eli propcrtics
involved iii this case.
Professional Code of
Professiona] Code of Ethics
Ethics The following and possible others have been Violate
d thru Misconduct
Rule 1.2 Scope of Representation

(a) A Lawyer shall abide by n client's decisions
co„cerning the objectives of
representation. s,ibject ot par„gr:,phs (b), (c) tind (d). {,nd
shall consult with the
client as to the means by,vhich tey are to be l,itrsue
d.
That in the Scheme o f stealing from Janice Divorc
e Lawyer Ilona Gretta(tier acted as
Janice lawyer and when asked for her documei,ts
and R "NOTE" for money that was
manipulated out of Janice through lies on or
around July 6.1990 for money by
Divorce Lawyer's own Rdmission in May
of 2008 that it was not David Grenadier
who stole such money only leaving Divorce
Lawyer Ilona Grenadier Heckmnn to
steal from the Soni:, Grenadier Trust through
her law firm.
Rule 1.3 Diligence
(a) A lawyer shall not with reasonable diligent mid promptness iii reprcse
nting a client
(b)A lawyer shall not intentionally fail to carry
out a contract uf employment entered into with
a
client for professional services, but maywithdraw
as pcrn-uued uttdcr Rulc I.16
(c)A lawyer shall not intentionally prejudice or
damage a client during the course of the profess
ional
relationship Divorce L,nn'er Ilona harmed Janice
in several crimi,ml :icts to cover up her and
her law firms steâlinf from the Sonia Grenadier Trust account
Rule 1.4 Communication - Divorce law'ver

:Ind other !:i,vyers lie<1 :ìç n D:~tteri: and practic
e-
Divorce Lawyer Ilona behind the back of
Client Janice in the Sonia Grenadier theft
from her
law office hid Dertinent facts only recenflv learned
. This fuc(s were kent from Judge
Grenadier's sister Ruth and her f:,milv as
Tlonn as a Dattern and Dractice stole from
them
using 8 forfed trust aereenient
(a) A lawyer shall keep a dient reasonably

illformcd about tbe status ot-u matter
and promptly
comply with reasonable requests
for information
(b) A lawyer shaíl explain a mutter
to the client rcasor.ably necessary
to pcrmit thc clicm lo
infortned decisions regarding
tlìc representation.
(c) A lau'ycr shall inform the client of
facts pertinent lo the matter and ofcom
munications
trom another party thal may sigiufi
cantly affect settlement or resolution
ofthe nièitter.
Rule 1.5 Fees
(a) A la,vyer's fees shall be reaso

nnble, 'rhe factors to be consi
dei'ed in determining the
reasonableness ofa fee
include the following:
I) The time and labor required.
the novelty and difficulty oftile
questions involved. and he
skil! requisite to pcrlbrm the
legal service properly,
2) The likelihood. ifapparent
to the client. that the acceptance
ofthe particular
cmploymcnt will preclude other
employment by the lawyer
3) The fee eustomorily ¢hai·ged
in the locality for similar legal
services
4) Thc amount involved and thc
results obtained:
5) The time limitations imposed by the clien
t or by the cücumstanccs,
12
6) The nature and length
ofthe professional relaz
ionship with thc client
7) The cxpcricncc, rcpi,tatio
n. and :ibility ofthe lawy
er or lawyers performing
and the services:
8) Whether the fee is fixed or

contingent
(b) A lawyers fee shall be

adequately explained ro
the client
Rule 1.6 Confidentiality of informn

tìon
(b)To the extent a lawyer

reasoilably believes necessa
ry tlie lawyer mny reveal:
(1) Si,ch information to com

ply with the la„' or a cour
t order
(3)Such information
which clearly establish
es that the client has,
representation, perpetra in the course of the
ted upon a third part
y, H FRAUD relwted
the representation. to the subject mntter
of
(c) A lawyer shall promptly

reveal:
( 1) Thc intcntion ofa clicn
t, as statcd by thc client, to
commit a crime and the info
twccssary to prcvcn[ thc crime. rmation
tilt beibre revealing stich infor
mation. the attorney shall
wherc feasible, advise the clien
t ofthe possible legal conseque
the clien
nces ofthe action. urgc
t not to commit the erün
e, and advise the c! ktit
Lhal thc dtlorliey must rcveal
clients criminal intention unle the
ss thcrc upon abandoned, and.
ifthe crime involves
PERJURY by the client. thüz the
attorney shall see to withdraw us
(2) Information which clear counscl:
ly establi:41CS that thc client
has, in the course ofthe
representation perpetrated a FRA
UD related to thc subject mutt
upon a tribunal. Before revealing cr o f thc representation
such information, however, the
that [hc clicnr advise thc tribunal lawyer shall request
of the FR AUD. For the pulposes
o f this paragraph and
paragraph (b)(3), information
is clearly established when
Ihe client acknowledges to the
attorney that the client has perp
etrated a FRAUD: or
(3) Information concerning thc
misconduct ofanother attorney
professional authority
to the appropriate
under RULE 8 . 3 . Whvrc thc infortnati r.ccessüry to
on report the
misconduct is protected undc
r this Rule, tlic allorney aíìer
consultüliolì must obtahi
clicnt consent. Consultation shoul
d illclude lìtll diselosttre of all reaso
consequences ofboth disclosu nably foreseeable
re and non-disclosure tó the
client.
Rule 1.7 Conflict of [üterest:
General Rule - Ben Di,Tluro
met witb and rei,resented J,u,i
Wolk Grenadier in the over çe
age of 404 E. Mouroe Ave
tire. That Janice discloçe
DiMuro who bv Rîineara d this to Bett
nce believes that since he
is n past President of the
donated 10% o 1 his estate Rt VSEI and Inis
the time of his death - he has
p,Irchased the Justice to hold
above the law :Ind nnvone him
he reoresents. Divorce Liwver Ilona Gren
believes Mhe is above the. ndier Heckmnn also
l:nv Rt:d should i,s thc Judxçs
ind L:,¥crs are „·illint: to m:t
careers oil the line to COVER t!!Cir
UP I,er criniìni,l Ncts trnd actio
ns.
(a) A lawyer shall not repr

esent o client ifthc repr
esentation ofthat clien
limited by thc lawyer's t may be materially
responsibilities to anot
hcr clicnt or to a third
lawyer's own interest person. or by thc
s. unless:
(2) Tlic lawyer rcasoliably beli

eves the represent:it ion will
(3) not be adve,sely affected:
The client consents aftc t,od
r consultation, Wlien repr
matter is undertaken, hc esentation of multipic clie
consultation shall include nts ina single
representation and the explanation ofthc implica
advantages and risks invo tions ofthe comnion
lved.
Ritle 1.8 Conflict of

Interest: Prohibited
Transactions
Rule 1.9 Conflict of Inte

rest : Former Client
J:mice W'(,lk Gren:idier
Ben DiM„ro w,s i, former client of
(a}A layyer who has forme

rly represcmed a client ilì
a Iniìîtcr shall Iìot tlìeleañer
iepr¢sent anlother
13
ests are materi:ÌI]y
which that person's ititer
tantially related nì:ilter in
person in tlle same or a subs pl·cs eIll und tì,I·m er clien t consent uftcr
ll,c
e lormci· clicnl unless both
adverse to lhe interests oflh
consultation.
:1 Sllbstanl iull> t 'lklle'll Jlla[!Cr m

represent :i person in lhe s:line or
(b)A lawyer shall not laloivingly
i,ssociatc had pre\'iowly,·epr¢sctized a cl„nt.
which a firm with which the lawyer iormcrly was
tion: General Rule

Rule 1:10 iniputed Disqunlifica
Govcrtiment Officers and
ial Conf licts of Interest for Former mid Ctirrent
Rule 1;11 Spec
Employees
r
Rule 1.12 Former Judgeor Årbitrato
Rule 1.13 Orga niz:it ion ns Clien t
Rule 1.14 Clieut with linpizirmetit
Rule 1.15 Safekeeping Property
than
r or luw tinn oiì belialfofa client. ollïcr
(c) All funds received or held by a lawye or more identifiable
ited iii unc
and expense, shall be depos
rcimburscmcnt ofadvances for costs law office is situated
in the gatc in which the
d at a financial institution
escrow accounts maintaine t as follows:
in excep
er or tw firm shall be deposited there
and no funds belonging to thc lawy
OF PROPERTY ín which
tion u lawyci· is in POSSESESSÏON
(d)When the course of representa
kept separate by the layer
claim intcrcsts, the propcrty shall bz
both the lawyer and another pci·son
arises concerning their
ance oftheir interests. lfa disptitc
until there is nn accounting mid sever
1:iwycr until the dispute is
dispute shall bc kept separate by the
rcspeetivc interest. the portion in ng $30.000. ro COVER
e into loani
of 1990 ina,linillated J:I,lir
resolved. Divorce lawver ij, ,J,ilv r Trust - which
Soni a Gien aclie
vement i,1 ste:1111,1! from the
UP her íind her Inw firms invol 1:,wvers
to Janic e. That the
refused to turn over
Divorce Lawver Ilona Grei,adier to Cove r UP these criminal
er are in colh, sion with ,hidp es
DÍMuroGinsbi,rg and Michael Weis
ncts and actions.
ion
Rtile 1.16 Decliningor Termin:iting Represent:,t
u client or where
(c) u lawyer sliall not represent
(b) Except as stated in paragraph
repicscntation ufa client if:
, bh.,11 withclraw from the
rcpreseutation has commenced
GRE,NÀDER R¢t,n#L as
DIVORCE LAWYER ILONA
3). The lawyer is discharged. -
,-,iati oi, oil Ji,lv 7.1990 hns
00. fi·ot,i her in i, ço,ive
Jai,íce ln,¥yer i,i steatiz,g $30.0
the mone v to eo into pavin fi offmonev stolen
ole
reftised toturliover NOTE. SI,est
h indirectl, / directly
to Durch:,äe properties. Whic
throulzh her IR,v fïrnì for GIC
moiev tnkem out of me
into G]C between this and
showç Jnnire Dl,t more fash
x-husband D:ivid Grenadier.
Bellefonte Partnership then
Rule 3.3 Candor Toward the Tribunal
(e) A lawyer shall not knowingly:
tribi,n:11:
(1) Make a false statement of fact or Lìw to a
:,t ;vhen disclos ure is necessiìry to p.void :,ssistìtig ki
(2) Fail to disclose a f:,ct to :, tribuit
criminal or frnitdulent :Ict by the client. subject to Rl,le 1.6:
ictioit
olling leg,Il nuthoi·it) in the subject ju,·isd
(3) Fni! to disclose to the tributl,il Colitr
:ind not disclos ed by
positilm of (he çlient
luio,¥n to the lawyer to be :ìdverse to the
opposing counsel: or
if a I:„vyer Ims offered material
(4) Offer evidence that the la,vyer knows to be false.
lß,vyer shall tnke reasonable remedial
evidence and comes to know of its falsity, the
measures.
Rule 3.4 Fairness to Opposing Party and Counsel
A líi) ß'er 511111! l,ot;
14
(i) File a suit, initiate crim
itìal c]Ìarges, assert a posit
ion. conduct a defense, delay
other action on behalfoft a trial, or take
hc client when the lawyer
kooivs or,vhen jt js obvi
would ous that such action
serve merely to harass or inûli
ciously injure another. THAT IS EXACTLY WHAT
SUÏT ÏS -MALICIOUS TO THIS
HARM JANICE AND HER
GTRLS.
Rule 4.1 Truthfulness in

Statement to Others
111 thc course ofrepresenting
a dien{ a lawyer shall oot
knowingly
(a) Make a false statemen

t offact or law: or
(b) Fail to disclose a fact when
discìosure is necessary to
avoid assisting a CRIMINA
L or
FRA UDULENT act by a client
Rule 4.3 Dealing with

Unrepresented Person
s
Rule 4.4 Respect for Rights of

Third Person
In representing a client a
lawyer sha]! not use means
that have no purpose other
delay or burden a third perso than to embarl·ass.
n. or use tnethods ofobtaini
ng evidence Lhal violate the
such a person. legal rights of
Rule 5. 1 Responsibility
Rule 5.5 - Unauthorized Prac

tice Of Law: Multijwisdictiona
l Practice of Law - DIVORC
E
LAWYER 1LONA GRENAD
IER HICKMAN USED A LAW
YER NOT LICESENDED IN
VIRGINIA TO STEAL REAL

ESTATE - her actions have caus
ed many homeowners in the City
of
Alexandria to have propcrtieN
with Janice Wotk Gretladier havin
u ownership:
(c) A lawyer shall „of prac
tice law iii ujtti-i.yc/ictioi
, iii yk,lcitioi, of t/le regtd
professio,i ili Thatjmlsdjctlon, atioj} t,fll,e legal
oi' assist cmother m d<}jijg so.
(d) Foreign Lüwt·ei·s:
(D "Fü, eign Lauyer" i.ï a pe,·son tmfho,·iz

ed lo pructice lt,w b\, I he dtlly
cojìsi Ìmíud ulìd
au,horized govermiîental
bc,dy OJ any Sk,te or Tej'}'ìtor
y (,j Ihe Uï,ited Slcttes or the
C<,jt,mhict, cir c,fcireixn „atio District of
,i, hm is „ci,j,e,· licensed h>·
the Sz,p,·eme Com·t Of Vii*mia
auihorjzed wider its j·tiles to prac or
tice Icn,· gejiet·i,ll.>- in t I,e C<,ljî
tliwi,i·ec,lth of Virginia, nor
disbarred or sttspei,dcd
from pructice it, ctity ju,·i
s dicliui.
(2 ) A Fo,·eig,i Lcn,yer sliull I, ot,
excepí us aittho,· ized hy these Rules o,· other law:
(i) estahlish c,ti (,ÍÉYIce t,r
orhe,· Ñyste,nettie aìid
e<,i,ti,i,u),ir presei,ce in I·'irginio
Qf law. which ma., occu for ýhe pracrice
r e,·e, 1 if tlìe l· ~~ , reig, i Law~ 'er
is Ilot phys ically preseil i, i
(ìi) hold out to the pt, blìc
~ 'irginia, oj·
or otherwise represei , t
that the Foreign Luwycr ià udmitted lo
practice law in Virginia.
(3) A Foreign Lani'e,· .çhcd
/ i,1/hj·m tlie cliei,t and mte
restcd third partie.A ìíì wrìt
(i) that the lawyej· is jto, admjued to ptücyice law m Virginia: ì,îg:
(ü) the jitrisclictioi }(s) iii which the

/ciw\·er js licei , setl m pjuctice.
a,id
(ììi) the Ia\,yer's o#ice
address in thefoj·eignjitri
sdictiou.
l4) A Foi ·eig,i /. awve
r mar, RÍ'er iqfi) 1'1 ,}ing íhe clje, i ,
os req „ i ,·ed i ,) 3 ( ij -( ijl) uhov
legal services o,i a tem e. provide
porary and occasional
hasis in Vi,gmia that:
(i ) are iti , cle,·taken
in assocìatioij N 'i'th a k,
H]· cr whü is
in Virgi}ìic! or c,dtniíí admitted to prcic·Ike wìthoul limitation
cd it,Ìder Part ] (tj Rul
e j A:5 of this ('ourí (t,id
H'110 ac{Ì\'ely purtìcjpcites
iii the maîtui':
(}i) clre hi or reasonctbly
i·elated to c, pe,kling oj- po,c
,itic,l proceeding be/ure
Ii ,·gi, ija or It t,·ihmiaj iii
anüthe ; jt „· isdictio„, if tile Fo,·e Law yer.
ig, I or a purstm Ihe Foreign Lau
assìftìììli, Ìs üìiîhol'ì,eli hy law ye ; is
or order io uppear Ìi xltch pro
ceeding or reasonably expects to
15
heso atit]:o}·i=ed:
(ill) are m or recr. ol,Qbly related tc, cl pe, idil,g or j,c,teil (iul urbiti
ü,ioit, mediatiolt. t,r otllei-
al ter,ìalive disptlle l'esolìi lìoll pro ceedil ÌK
ìlì Virgmìu ür ilíìollìer j urìsdìc {ìo H, ìf lhe
sei'yìces
ürise oi # t {)»fur ure
i -cciso , icil, h. j -elatcd to che Fuj -cig{ Lu , 17 ·cr '.y
1 pructtce m u Jill 'isdtcíto, t m
which 0,e Foreig,I Lcn,ycr Is admitted
m pracíice a, id
,·eqi, ires pro hac ,·ice admission : ate not äctniccs, for whiclî tile jbru,}î
or
(ivj üi'e Ilol within pc,r„g,·opl,s (4)(ii)
ot· (4)(iìi) m,J w·ise out ufor are reaso
nably relc,ted lo
the represelilaíìo}1 ofa clìejií by 11ie Forei
gjì I.a\Ú'er in a jìt)'Ìsdìclioiì i}t which the Foreig
,i
LoiQ,e,· is admitted to piäctice or, A,ibje
ct to tile fc,iegc,ì,ìg lìmìtations, are gcìyen
ied prìinarìly
hy i„ternatio,ial law
.
(5) A foreig,ì legal coilät{Ìmm
pructicìttg wider Rifle JA:7 Ol
tlljs Colirl alìcl (l col'porüte
cow Isel regist }'ant pruclicing under Pu ,·t 11 ufkt ,le / A : 5 cd tlijà ('c , m t w -e
m, t ui , t hori=ed Ici
practice tmder this nde.
Rule 5.6 Restrictions On Right To

Practice
A kn,yer shall m,t participole in offeri
„g or making:
• (a) a pctrmerslìip or etiîplo,·Iììem cig,·eetì ,ejíí
that re. trìclx the rìgjìl ofa lawyer lo
pracíke
after termination of the rululionship, u.\-cep/
a,1 agieemem coucei'/mlg beltejiís i,po,1
i·elireme}if; or
• (b) an agreeme,it i,1 whicli a j·est,·ictio),
ou the lawyer's right to practice is part
of the
seff/emem ofa controversy, exce
pt where .ç /,eh a restriction is approved
by a trih,mal or a
governmemal emil\·.
Rule 6.3 Membership hi Legal Scrvkes Orga

nization
A la\,yer may serve as a di ,·ecto,·,
oßìce,· or me,i ,het · of a legal services
organi=at io ,1, apat'tfrom
the tawji,·,11 i„ wj}ich d,e
lawye,· p,·aeíic·es, ito,\, i Í /:stc, l ,di,
tg í /ict , dîtz urgi , i , Ì=a , iot, serves
persons
having interests adverse
ro a cliej, t (,f lhe l,nn ,ei '. ihe lc, wver shall ,„it
decision ot· action of the orga k,)„ witig /y participate i„ c,
ni-a f ion:
• (cl) ifparticit,ating j,l t/,e decj.s io,1 or ac,jo,1
H·et,Id be jj,eo,iipat ihle /he h-nt,·er's
obligc,íitmä to a clìe„i it,ìder K~e
1.7: or
• (b) where tile decision cir action c'oitld Iiare o mc,íurja t,d/
í ,e/.ve elleci („1 íj}e }'ep)ese,italioìì
(da client of the organi=ation whos
e i„,ei·esls are <,d\,erse lo a e'jìe,) 1
Of Ijie Io,n'er.
Rule 6.4 Law Reform Activ

ities Affecting Client Interests
AÌÌA Model Ritle not adopled.
Rule 6.5
Nonprofit And Court-Anncxcd
Limilcd Legal Services Programs
• (a) A lap#yer who, u,idei- the aì,spices Ofa prog
ram sponsored b\' a jio,ìj~Ivjìt orgat
,izutioi,
or
court, provides short- tel '„1 limited legal Aervk·eà 1(, u diem withcmt expectatk,I by ett/iej '
tlie ]0143'el' or the cliel ,t thc,

t the lawyer will proi'ide coi , 1 ìit , i } ig repl
·ese „ tatio ,i m the mau
er :
o (1) is subject to Rides 1.7 attd J,9(a) o,}/y
.iíJj}u law\'et kuu il'.ç ihctt íhe reprufe}}tatioi, of t he
client involves u cojijlict OJ ij,Iei
ei, a,id
o (2) is sithjecí [o Rule
J.JO (,jìly ifthe
hnlye, k,mìi·s ,]iüí Lij,otjier la,13'ei· (&<,cialed wilh the
la,vyer in a lawjìi·,n i,v clisqt,alif
ìcd hy Rîtlc J.7 or l,9(a) with
respccf {g the marrcr.
• ( b) Exceplas provided lil para
graph (a)( 2), Ritle i . i {) is i „app
licuble lo a retjresemation
governed bv this Riíl
e.
Rules 7.I - 7.6 - Information

About Legal Services
Rule 7. l Coinmunications
Concerning A Lüwycr's Serv
ices
16
• (o) A law)·e r sha/i noí mi,ke a,lc,is·e or
misleading commw,iccmo,1 izboî
tl me lawyer or me
/ctwyer 's services, A cumm
ull icatio,t is Ads:e oi· Itlisjecld¿ng (f ií cuutc
misrepreseilfation offa mls U illaíel'Íat
ct (,r knv, or (,mifs (, jac
t whei, oinissic)11 (,f si,c·
h fact mükcs tile
statenie,it materially false or mìsl
ectdinq GS a H·ht)/e.
• (b) A commimicutioi violates

,his rule ij it adverlises spec
i/ìc or ci,!,11,luíj\'e case resi,
Ils,
withoiu a (Iisclain,cr íliat (i) pitts
the case rexi,l,s in a c,mtext fhat
i.s j,oí mislcadi,ig: (ii)
sýctles thal cose )'eçt,/t.ç
depend îipon a 3'O,Veo' Rffactors uuique lo each case
: and (ìii)
furlher slales thal cctse resli
lls do nof gitarantee or pred
ict (, sìmilar resilll Ì„ ail\'Jtítllr
e
case lindei'taken by tìie
Ici,ú'cr. l'lie disclciìmer shal
l precede tl,e co,i„ lil , ixication
results. When the communicaticm is Of the Ca.%'C
m writing, tile dixcluìmer sholj he jn
hold typeface aud
u!,percase lelters in a fo,H size
tlta, ìs at leas, as large as the
lurge. t text used lo adye,·,Ìse
//i L spec l. fic or cli,ittlalive
case ,·es ,i //s aud iii tlie same color aid agc, i „st
Ihe suine colored
backgrotmd aä the lext z,sed to adver
tise the specific or Çltmltlalire case
results.
• (C) Am' advertising pit):xiíu,
it to Illi:ç Rule shall Ìi,cli,de
the iìüme ai,d qilìce add/·ess
lecl.ît one la,#yer respoisih/e,fc,r Us confen
the Virg),)} a Sfa , e Bar t: or, iji fhe cdternatjve, a lc„1·,fij·i), i,ïayjì
o ct , n ·em wrmeti stcitei„e, tt ide, le wüh
itj, A· ing ílje luwyel ' resj )<,j}s, ble
Icn,·jìrm 's advertisi ,ig and for lhe
its cdjice achhrv . Zhe
law tìrm shall pi 'onipth, l ,jkktte the written
stc:remem iflhere is cmy chau
ge ìit sícítta.
• (d) A la),yer shall timely respond to a,ìdfitlly coop
erate with any reqitexîs for infor
mation
bl' E / hics ('I), insel regaic /i , I,v /he
/a ,n ·er 's IKA ·ertisiug .
Rule 7.3 Direct Contact With

Potential Clients
• (a) A Icntye,· shall,tot solicit cn:vl
oyt,ie,it,fr,m, ct potential client if:
( 1 ) the potential cliem has mc,d¢ k, iowi, to Ihe
lowrer
a desire i , ot to he solicited by the la\n,er : o,
(2) the soliciíatioti involves
lìarassme ,it, widite mfïitcjic
e, cocrckm , dttt ~ . is, compttlsici, i,
jnlimidati<m, lh:·eats or itilwci,7·anted
promises (,1 hej,e/) fs.
• (b) A /mtyer sha// mil give
üuwhing qfro/i,e /c) c, persc)//./i,
r rect,/j,i,teic/i„g /he /i,Ho'e/·'.ç
se,·vices except that u lawyer may:
• ( 1 ) pay the reasonable CU.Ç /S (,f udvei 'Iiscmc}, 1.1
or cüm, Ii „,] icatiwis pei ·j}ijlíed by Ihis j<tile
a,Icl Rule 7.J;
(2) pay the I,st,al cha,·

ges
of c, Jegr,; se,-rice pk,it o,·
c, mdln·-pruf,t (!ttulifìed /cnn'er refei·r
service, af
( 3) payfor a law
pl 'actlce m uccorckmce with R ,tlc 1
. 17 ; a ,id
(4) give „ominal gifts qfg,·u,Ìní
de thctt are iei,hei· i,ite,îcled m,r
rec,sc,tiahl\'
of comvettsaf k,ilfw recomme expected /o be a form
jldi)?g u /üwver's services.
. (C) Eve,·y wrjftei, reco,·ded o,· e/ec,I·oitic commm,icuf lu,i.ÍÌ'om u kiwyer w,iìclli,lg
p "c .)lesxionc, l e }}lpjoymejlt

from u pote,jti¿il clie,) t k,i,; w, î to be iii I , cect of legal xcn'ice
partict,lar matter shall cons s itt a
piciu,i,sly display the words
"Af)VERTISING MATE.RI
the oi, ls ide e,lvelope , ìf a, ty, AI." („,
a ,} d ot me hegi , ij , i,
jg ü„d ending ofcmy recorded
Co,mmm,C U,jo,], w,less the J-ec}
o,· elect ronic
pjem (lf the comnmnicati
ow:
• (1) is a /ait'1'c/': ü,
(2) has a fa„tllial, perso,îa
], or p,·ior p,·ofessìoi,ctl rela
(3) is one wh tioi,E]tip with
o has I,ad prio the lawyer, or
,· contact
with /he /r, M'Ì'ei'.
Rule 7.4 Communication Of Fiel

ds Of Practice And Certific
ation
Lou~·er.Tmay s,ale, ol,ttoimce or
hold íheinselve,s out as
limiti,tg their Ii-octice m
area orjìeld of lawsc) a particular
long as Ihe coi,ì,Iìt,jjicajici,1
~~j~ fitch limi
tation of pracliceis
with the standards (if iii accordance
this Rule, Rzífe 7.1 w,c
l Rttle 7.3, as ctj,prol,jiat
imply thci, the tcnn·er has e. A lai,yci slicill not slat
been rccügni-ed o}· cer,i/}e em
d c,x o xl)ecia/i,si in c, pct,
except as follows: ·tici,Jc,i'jie/d (f k,w
(a) A lawyer admi{ Ied to eiìgage

i ,1 pulem pracíìce befo
re lhe Uiììted Síates P,
ile ,ìl uiìd
17
Tradenîark Qtlice muy use tlle desjgl,utioti
"Pate,it Att<,r,jey" or o s,th.s/oi,Iic,ll>· sij,ijlcw
desig, ia tion:
(h) A /allye/' engaged in Admiralíy
l)"ttctice mci\' ttse as a designütjc)11 "Admiralîy," "Procmr ili
/ldinìi'ally " or a sìihstaiíially similar desjg
,iutìo , i :
(c) A lawyer who has bee,i certijìed by the Si,preme Court of l·'j,Xi„ic
i us a 5pecjulist ill some
cc,J,Ucìïy may ,/xe ihe desig,ia,ion Oj being >.o certifìed. e.g., "cei·tijied
nieclictto,-" c,r o si,bs,c,„tic,lh,
similar designa:i<m:
(d) A la\,yer may commtmìcatc thefact that the lenn·er

has heciì certìjìed ci.r a sj,ecìalìst i, i a jìeld
ol'law by a naniecl orgc„,i~a, io„, pi·oi,ided Ihut
tj,e co,11,112,1, icut i (i, , cl carly s kí,e.ï tl ic{ t there ì.s
i,o
procedure iji the ('c,mmoj , wcalth
Of Vìi ·ginìufoi' appro \· i , ig cei lilj'ittg utgctit
izati<)1 ] à .
Rulc 7.6 Political Contributioiìs to Obtain Le,ual

Engagements or Appointments by Judges
Rules 8.1 - 8.5 - Maintaining the Integr

ity ofthe Profession
Rule 8.1 Bar Admission And Disciplinary Matters

Ai , applìeaitfor ad,nissioit to die bar, oi ' a
/a " 3 ' er ali ·eady admiued tt) Ihe bar. iii coimectiün 14 -i /h
a bar adtnlssioji application, cmy certìfìcatìot,
required to be /iled as ct cojìdìtioi, of „Ìailt{U
iltillg
or renewi„g u license to pructìce law, or ì„ comwc
tion wilh a disciplì,tcín, mciller, shc,ll I,ot:
• (co ki,owjjìgly make a fölse stateme,it (,/ materiallact:
• (h) fajl to disclose afact itecessary lo con'ecí
a mlsuppiehens jt),i kj}owi hy t he persoji t o
have arisen in /he mauer;
• (C) jòil lo respo,id to ct la\*l de,i,atìdj},i- irlfot·tnc
ttiojì fi'()111 a,i üdmjssiois or discipli,ia,7·
alitho,·iry, except that this Rttle does not ,·eq,lire
disck,sure t,f j„forj,iotio,i ofhcr„Yse
protecfed by Ride l.6: or
(d) obscrwcí a lawtì,1 jjive,tíigatjoij by a,i admiss
ions or discipli,iury uî,Ihuriíy.
~ •
Rule 8.2 Judicial Officials
A Icn,yer shall not inake ct stateme, jt that íhe lawye,· km,ws m he false
or with reckless disregard
as to h .s t,·ttth orjälvity co ,ice,·„ i„g the qialit
ìcatic,is <}r integ ,·ity of a .j, idge u,· either
judicial
o#lce/'. For all lawvers - Ilona Grenadier
Heçkman, Ben DiMitro, Michael Weiser, Judge
John Trnn , Hillnry Collyer. Andrea Mosley
False St,itements have been i, pattern and
Dractice in the Citv of Alexandria Court doc,im
ents, in court and to the S,ipreme Court of
Virei n i 9
Rule 8.3 Reporting Misconduct
• (C{) A /a,t,·er havmg ,·ellable itlformatiojt Nìctt ctlìothe

r lawyer has committed a.uiojafion oj
lhe Ri, les O.f Prolessio ,iul ('o, idztc·1 tlicit raises a
si, bsta„tial qi ,e.çíio, t as lo thut
lawyer 's
hoì ,esty, trustwoi ·thinesx t >}' jìmess to p,·actice law shall i , ijc,
rm the upl)1
'Oprit, fe j ),·tijüsäìü„ al
ai,cl,o,·ity.
. ( h) A Icm)*er huvi/,g rcliahle i/ l/brntu/
ioi / l,Ltt u judge has committed u
vjü /a/ io ,j (,/
applicable 1 '!tles
ojj:, diciul co, iditcí thut raises u siíbslujìt joi qitesíioil c, i ío ílìe il,dge 'x
jlt„ess jür cdìc·e shall
i,Î,12„·m Ihe apprc)[ij'iate
atttlic,rity.
• (c) Ifa law\'er sen,i , as a third pat·,y
tg nezm·al receives reliable i,ìfoi malic,n diring lhe
disptile resohttiol, process íhul a,]oíli
ej· Ía,ger has ejigaged in misconduct
the lawler
H ·oì, ld otherwise be reqi, ired to
report b, ttjür its coiljìde,{ tial jtat,tj
~e, t he ici \,yer shelli
allempl jo obîuiti the paivies'
w/'itteji agreeinei)1 tc, 11 Ctive co"Jìdeníic,lin· cit,d
Pc,·mìt
disctosi,i'e (ifsitch li,12)7
,101*oi) to #ie ctppropriüte
j,rofessjt)),ot cit,f/)<),·in·.
• (dj This Ritle (/Oes iìol reqìiìre dixclosuie of inform

ation olherwìse projected bv Ri,]e J.6 or
18
itifor,nafio}1 gcli}ied bv ct tciw\,
ei· or .jifdsze who is a mej),bei·
l),1 w, c,pp,·ured /awver')
ussistct,ice pt-ügrunî,
or whois u [t-aitted il,[e
n'eilor (,r \:üllitueerjor
stich aprog,·üm or
commì{ Iee, or who Ìs <,theì'wîse cüo
perclli,Ig i,i a particular assì
stcmce *r l, when such
i,,(formatioi, ìs obtai, Iedfor
the pljl 'j )(,Ses ofjì ,lfìllit ,g the
recognized ohjectives
of the
program.
• (e) A kntyel- shall ij®i-m
the l'Ìigiltici Xfute Bar if
o (I) flie lawyer has bee)1 djsc
iplined by u state c,rfedei'c
eottrl iii any sta tl dixeij,li,!a,-y ut,tll~,1'in', agen
te, U. S. terrìtor\·, or the District cy (ir
of Cohimhia,
professkmal conduct i„ thtil fm · u vi<, lcitio , i of rtiles Of
j,i,·isdicti,m:
o (2) (he la,wer has beei, coi,
iìc! ed ojci .lekmy m
a stctíe, l .1. 3. íe~-!~itc)1:y, Di:~írict of ( üllíinbia,
m' federal coi,j'i ;
o ( 3 ) Ihe lawver has beeji côi ,~ · ictedof
eifher aci 'jiie i ,irol
or perit ,1 'y, or an atte vi, ig tliejt,, fi·atíd, ertc ,rtio hrih
mpt , sol icitation o ,· con ,1, ery
bpi ,·ücy ío commit
cmy of tlîejb
otfeises, in a stat
e, l ]. S. territory, District oj rego i „ g
('olt ,mbict, oj ·Jedercil coi,
req , Ii,·ed hy pai ·agroph (c) rt. lhe reportmg
oj' this Rule shall be made i ,i
writi ,ig to the ('lerk <,Jíhc
Dìscìplijìary System
of íhu Virginia State Ba ,·
not late,· t /iaj , 60 days . fc,/lo
wj,ig eim ·y of auy
jìnc, l order orjitdgmem of co, wìcíio„ or
Rule 8 . 4 - Misconduct
,Iìscìpli , ie. 1
- That the lawvers with the
J „ dwes have had ex- part
communications to wor e
k in concert in court. in
nl] Orders ns Judge Jam
Opposinp side "Write uD, es Clark tel!5 the
vhat ever vou w:,nt and
l,vill siEn it"
It is pi·(ìfessln,Ial 1),iscoi,
duc, for ü lawyer to.
• (a) violate or attempt to
„iolate the Rlt/es of Pro
/dssiol,al Cojìdttct, kltowtll
l„Lluce another lo do gly ussist or
so, or do so througli
tjìe Licis o,/ w,oihet·;
• (h) commit a criminal
or Lieliheratel\' ~i ·on#,
l c,ct îhat t 'ejïccts adverse
ly ml the
jlonesf\·, n'1/Stw lawyer 's
o)·tjliness or /lm
ess to proc/ic c lü\,d
• ( c) engclge ì ,ì conduc
t ì , n'oh'Ìiìg dìshoi,esiy, frrmd, dec
eit or ji, bt epreòeliíu { Ìoli
reflects (kivei'sely o,i the law ~·hic/,
yer'sfmìess to
practice k m •,·
• (d) state or imply a} j abilir\' to i,jlt
,e,ice improperh · or
irlhimal, legislative hodÿ, iti )( m irrelevant grotmds aîn:
or p,ihlic oßìcic, l : or
• (e) ktiowi„gly assist a
j,idge orjltdicjal Oftìc
er i„ coitcli,c·t tjtat is a
\'iolctt,oti ot applicahle
rules üfjî ,dìcial conduct or of her
lc,w.
The 11!egal Jailing of Tltcit Ji ,lge Ciarks ttcfi

ons h,n·e turned back fim
Janice Wolk Grenadier someone i, n,ler Title
c. Giving Janice less righh
íhen (1 slave. Taking
42 US Cc, de I 994 ti ,id Title
Title 42 US Code 1994, j 8 US Cwle 1581 (c,): Who
evei · j}olds or reim ·, is
any pei 'son m a co, Idi,}o„ of PEONAG
E, shall he jìned m,dcr this
Title 18 US Code 1581(a) 2 () years or hoth. Tllat oii
fitle ibt imprisoned i ,ot
„,ore Iha, i
Oc fohc ,· 32. 20 14 . Ja , jice
30 days which is a vio/ario was ploced injoijfor
n of my Thi,·teei,tli A„,eitti„ fa ih,re to pco. legcilfeesi ,i
ic,it "Nejthei· S/a,·e,·y jjot
T~tCC;~Ct~th, 8th & sei·vimde, except Lis mm
islime,i, for o c,·ime whe
re of tl,e pa,·ry shalt l,ai'
i;ì\·<,/i,;ìtai·>,
within tlîe [I,iìted Staîes, e d,dy co,i v jctcd, sl,ü!1 ex/:çi

or any sìihjecl to tlìeit· J,ti'
Ìsdìc,ion". Furthermor
"tmder" a îfate Pet)„a e Ihe rigli, by placmg me
ge / I„rnhmtoln, Sen·it,t
de i,iolcitl,IAE the Foiti·ili
prosectitjoi, false imp Ai,Iejidine,w right hy jnal
risomnent a„d itj,CI,ijs iciot,s
limf ÌO„al Ctn est. This
Right as to Exces.vh vic,lo,iol, of my r, igjlt
e ßail which in this Amejidmejìt
cas e constilt,te. "Res,itittioti ßai/" whi
Ic!,owledgeahl
e maliciot ,s j, ch.tilrtliej· sl,o,m the
tte„ t to silence me
ml the e/ eetio, i wa
s over o,t No \,em
Retaliation ai,d Ret ber 411,- 2014. Bias,
ribtllioiì lo ftti~lier
line the Lawye,·s poc
kets by Judge Cla,
k.
j..iaiunciul Conflict
The Judicial Canon's witlî Bt,i·ke A,icl Herbe
,·t Bi,itk
ignored by all Judg
es 2. The Judges have vio
lated Canon I ofthc
Canons of Judicial Con
Virginia and United duct íor the Commonwe
States of America in alth of
that they:
a. failed to uphold the
integrity and indepe
ndence ofthe judicia
b. failed to maintain and ry
cnforce Standa,ds ot'
conduct fôr fcllow jud
Court. ges, undo fficcrs of thc
c. failcdto obscrvc mini
mül standardssothat the
integrityand independence
ofthe judicia ry
19
would be preserved.
d. failed to construe and apply tllc
provisions of thc Canons oflud
ícidl Conduct to further
their objectives.
e. reduced the public confidence
in the integrity and independence
ofjudges and the
deference ofthe public to thejüdgme
nts and rulings ofcourts and injure
government under law. d thc system uf
f. acted based on favor

g. failed to comply with the
law
h. failed to interpret and apply
Lhc laws that govern us.
i. failed to respect and honor the
judicial office as a public trust
.
j. failed to enhance and maintain confi
dence in our legal system.
k. failed to bc an arbiter of facts and law for
the resolution of disputes.
1. failed to meet even minimal
standards for ethical conduct
ol'judges.
3. The Judges violated Canon 2 of the

Canons of Judicial Conduct in that
they failed to rcspcct and
comply with thc law and failed to
act at al! times in a manner that prom
otes public confidence in
thc integrity and impartiality ofthe
judiciary.
4. The Judges violated Canon 3, ofthe Cano

ns of Judicial Conduct by failing ro perform the
duties o fhis judicial office impartiall
y and diligently.

on 313(2) iii that they thiled to be
faitlitìl] to the law and
müintain professional competenc
e in it.

on 38(4) in that they failcd to hear
and with patience. failed to dispo any proceedings fairly
se promptly ofthe business ofthe
court and failed to bc efficient
and businesslike while bcitlg
honest ancl deliberate.
7. Thc Judges violated Canon 3, Sectio

n 3B(5) in that they failed to perform
without Retaliation, Retribution, judicial duties
Favoritism. Cronyism bias or preju
dice.
8. The Judges violated Canon 3. Secti

on 38(6) in that she failed to refrai
n in Orders froin
manifcsting, by words or conduct.
bias or prejudice based upon socia
others. Judges violated Canon 3, l hierarchy, to protecl
Section 38(7) Ìn that they failed
to accord every person who
has a legül interest in a pj·oceedmg,
the right to be heard according to law.
9. The Judges violated Canon 3 . Sect

ion 313 ( 7 ) in that they and there sla
and/or considered ex parte ff initiated . perinítted ,
communications , or considered other
communications made to the
judge outsider the presence oftile
parties concerning a pending or
scvcral Occusions. impending proceeding on
10. Thc Judges violated Cano

n 3, Section 313(7) in that she
failed to disclose Lo all parties
pai·te cotnm unications dcscribed in Secti all ex
ons 313(7)(o) and 3 B<7)(b)
pending or impending before the regarding a proceeding
judge.
l I. Tlie Judges violated Canon

3, Section 313(7) in that they indep
endently investigated facts in a
casc outside the courtroom and
considered evidence other than
thal presented iii documents, and
with îhc thct they did not allow
my witness's to take the stand
.
12. The Judges violated Cano

n 3, Section 38(7) üi that they
noz violated through law clerk failed to insure that Section
38(7) was
s or other personnel on thc jtidg
c's staff. [1.fcominunication
between the tria! judge and
the appellate court with resp
ect to a proceeding is perm
ofany written communicati itted, a copy
on or thc substance ofany
oral communication should
to ail parties.] be provided
13. Thc Judges violated

Canon 3, Section 38(
8) in that they failed
business ofthc court. to dispose promptly ofth
in a ibir and unbias why e
following tlie law and
rules ofthe Court.
14. The Judges violated Can

on 3, Section 13(9) ill
that she failed to abst
about a pending or imp ajn Íroni public commen
ending pi·oceeding in t
any court. and failed
to direct si,nilar abstenti
the part ofcourt personn el subiect to his direction and on on
control
20
15, The Judges violated
Canon 3. Section ]C{
I) in that they fuilcd
judge's administrat to diligently di:icharg
ive responsibilitie c the
s withozlt bias or
prcjltclícc and mainta
compctcnce iii jud in professional
icial administrat
ion.
16. The Judges violatc

d Canon 3, Section
30(2) in that tlley
failed to require staf
and others stlbjcct f, court officials
to theji,dgc's direct
ion and contro] to obs
diligctice that apply to erve the standards
thejudge and to refra of fidelity and
performance of the in fi·om mnnitesting
bias ol· prci„dice ili the
ir o tficial duties.
17. The Judges violated

Canon 3, Section 3C(
3) iii that as a they Jud
mcasurcs to assure the ge failed to take reason
prompt disposition ofm able
atters bc foic the cúu
Waz rtin a professional and
fair
18. The Judges violated

Callon 3, Section JC(4)
in.
a. that they failed to exe
rcise the power of app
ointniclit impui-Lìally and
that they engaged itì Rct on the basis ofmerit;
aliution. Rctriblltion. Bia
s. :md sliowecl Íkivoriti
sm:
19. The Judgcs violate
d Canon 3, Section JI)(
1) in that l!]cy receiv
indicating a substantial ed reliable iníbrmation
likelihood that other Jud
conflicts and had commit ges. aixl Lawyers hat
acted crimina!]y. had
ted violations of tlicse
Canons or olher laws und
appropriate action. thcy did not take
20. The Judgeg violated Cun

on 3, Section 31)( 1) in
had committed violati that they hud knowledge
ons ofthese Canons that Judge ünd lawyers
that raises a substan
o mce and they did not tial question as to the
inform the Judieial inquiry ir fitness for
as they are required and Review Commission
to do. or other authorities
21. Thc Judges violated

Canon 3, Section 30(
2) in that they receiv
a substantial likeliliood ed reliable information
tliat lhe atîorney's m îl,is indicating
e:ìse and others had com
ihç Code of Profession: mitted a violation of
,l Responsibility und they
did not t:,kc appropriat
e action.
22 . The Judges vio
lated Canon 3 , Section
D ( 2 ) in that had knowle
Hackman and others has dge th :tt Attorney Ilona
comtnittcd violrltíons ofth Grcnadicr
rßised ß substantial quc e Code of Proíüssjonal
stio,i as to his [rtistwo Rçsr~onsibílity that
rthincss and fitness as
inform the Virgin a lowyer and thev did
ia Statc Bar. not
23. Thut to date December

2,2015 Janice has per
sonally provided sev
Motions to Judge out eral 5[utenicnt's aid
lining much ofthe abo
ve and offering to pro
vide additional informa
tion.
24. The ubove Judges
have engaged in "Condli
cl pi·cjudicial to the pio
(Va. Const, art. Vl. § pcr .idminislration o fjus
10; Codeof Vüginia ticc"
§ 17,1-906) ami there
inveå : tig ,ttìils Lmd
a Speciu ) Gru per fut mancc Us O Judge
nJ Jury shuuld bc
clnpo ,¥ ercd Íur
nee ds
into this court and the actions ofthc above Judges. . ì 12111 - anij unbia .
tflves [ Iga [} otì
TITLE 18, U.S.C.,

Ïlltocre,·, under
c(,1(,r (tt' (t,~y law,
SECTION 242 statute, urcli,icittce
, 1·cgt:lctíiti,t, or cus
perso, i in tll,y S,a tcmi, willfully sub
te, Terri ,<, n·, Cü jects a:iy
,li ,iîo ,I , re, tltlt , Pc,
riffhts, m·i yjle-
gey ,_f?!1[t, 1'1 'mi sse fsiü ,î, „ i· 1)istric
tics xec ,t ,·e, l or i),·< , m Nie dei , ri ,#,itiün ofumv
, tectecl 1>,· tl, r Co
Smtex . ... Nluill be line nsfiti, ri ,m or Ictw
x of Il, e United
d ind er tl, is title ur i„,J )1 'IN„
bodily i ,ijury results „ e,1 m,1 mmö 1),<, Iî
<,I, e yeitr, (, i · b,)th , mt
from tile {tcts committed i ,i rit ,1 if
,l {Itit),1 of tí, i ,í sec
/,se , (Iîtolilvt
ed ttse , or threutle ,i !( l il.Çe tio n or ibttcl , (ic·t # ì
, Iclttde the
linder this title o,· [), f (' *mpü * wei
ili,i} riso ,led i,of ti, tpon , c. vp /„.çi. j , c.# , m · jìrc
ure tlt, tn k ,î ,·e, , x1: cill be fined
ct)»îmittecl in u·s, ur bu ,/t; (índ
Vi „ 1(ttìl ),i Of thi ij clcc , tl, 1 ·es :Iltx ji·o
x Nectio ,i or if m tl, e (tct5
aggrctv ,tted xi, ch uct ,# i ,icli, de kìd,
se.rli<tl (Ibttse, ictpi ,ig ai ' an
(, r (, it (ttk,1,pt cttt emi ,t to ki, l,îc ,i,.
%1:(,11 I,e fi„ed umler this to ctm , mit „gl: rclríttccl xex
title, ar i„ipris ,i: iml (ibltse, (,r (ll
ecl ß, r ci„y term {tttempf 1 (, kill,
sentenced m deat <,fyectrx c,r f,) r life,
h. o; hoth, or mt
,y be
Racketeering 18-U
SC § That the appear
1961, Extortion ance to is that
tlìe Jildges were
18 USC § - jailed und torlür and are in the
loop ofthc collus
ed for being poo io,1 ut-I,avi)18 J:lll
-- r, Calholic and ,CC
to Cover up the
criminal acts.
Al all (imcs
21
1951. 18 USC § 1963, Va threatening üicarceration by
other Judges iflanice did not pay.
Code 18.2-470 VA Code intimidation in hopcs of Colhision with others in the
Janice being ML:i·dci·ed or
coinlilitti,itz suicide thc
¿:cl:i and actions show
§18.2-439 Acceptance of pattern and practice / Collusion
o f Virginia Circuit Court Judg
a
es, USDC Federal Court aild
Appeals
bribe by officer or candidate Court in Virginia and the District of Colu
mbia That when DiMuroGinsberg. Gren
Starace Duffett & adier Anderson
Kieser donated substantially to the Portr
ait of Judge Dona
ld Haddock was nothing
more than a THAN K YOU
- BRIBARY for always havin
g their back. That Janice was
Solitairc Confinemcnt to held in
ensure that e-mails of the
con'üption could not be relea
election of Senator Mark Waru sed prior to the
ei· who had gottcn caught "pay
Virginia. to play" with a Federal Judge
ship in
Obstruction ofJustice 18 Making judicial decisions otìtsi

de ofthe courtroom and relyi
USC § 1503(a), § 1505, § ng on extrajudicial. ex parte
to issuc substantive decisions. infoi'1]la[Ìon
Conducting ex parte discussion
s with opposition and governme
agencies. Not rcqi:iring opposition nt
1506.§ 1510.§ 1511,§ to prove their case but ruüng for
proccdural due process, denying them i,nyway. Denying
1512.§ 15!3.§ 1514.§ any and all witness's or informatio
n that showed the criminal
1514(A),§ 1519 VACode § activity of Ilona Grcnadicr Hcck
ma,V David Grçnudicr/Eriku Lewi
s and their Ia\vyers. Is~míng
18.2-409 Resisting or baseless, noncompliant orders
and seeking or trying to intimidate
with the possibility of money to
obstruction execution of opponents lawyers. That lawyers
ignore Subpoena!;/ ask to have quash
getting thc information together ed due to a bit ofwork
legal process VA Code 18.2 or to hid thc "TRUTH",
Mail Fraud 18 USC § Causing thc issuance ofcoerciv

e letters demanding püyment ofba
1341 making tlwcats ifl do not pay, seless legal fees Ìn support and
thcn illegallyjailing Janice, The
above Judges aftcr a conversation
with Judge Haddock, Martha
Kent et ül Janice believes the
Judges believe they are above
and by all appearance cooperati the law
ng outside to find favor With othc
rs in die Jucliei:,ry
Honest Services Fraud 18 Thc Scheme is Systemic denia

l of honest services ofthe cour
USC § 1961 t system. while perpetrating a
scheme to gain favor with other kickback
s, or financial gain, To be seen
as a game player wizh the "Old
Network" with the hope ofpa Boys
y raises, bonus and the
what ever the Judge tnay requ paytnellts towards din: ici s . parties. portraits or
est ofzhe lawyers which give
the appearance ofbribery. Thut
has seen first hand that the Judg Janice
e's and Lawyers who arc friends
is made prior to thc tria! for tile talk prior to a Trial and the decis
bcttcr friend ofthc most Powerful ion
Judge as in Janiee's cûse it is
Judge Donald Kent and Judge
Donald Haddock by appearan
ce running the Judiciary et al
Virginia and in Washington in
DC it would be Judge Walton,
Howell. Leon and Boosberg.
USDC of VA Judgc Lee with and in the
appeals Judge's Wilkinson. Niem
eycr, Ilamilton along wizh many
other in the USDC ofth
c District of Columbia
Gang Activity - Collusìon with numcrou

s Ìndivìduals and agencìes
to obstruct jitsticc. Smearing
Conspiracy 18 USC § 1961 reputation to obtain self- character and
serving favors with tlie imen
tioll of causing overt denia
VA code § 18,2-22 blocking receipt ofhonest
services while some judg
ls ofdue process and
es huve been seeking illeg
Deformation of Janice Wolk al puyments.
Grenadier
Public Assistance Fraud Participating in schemc

co firoudulcndy obtuin ätotc
VA Code §18.2-469 Officer and fcdc ral funds through thc Ham
and extorted payments from p Progrum
nie, for Ilona Grcnadicr Hec
refusing, delaying, ect., to basis. with the intention ofdi klna n and lawyers without lega
stributing the money among l or factual
execute process for co-conspirators. That ignoring
$251 Billion in fines, allow thc banks
ing Lawycrs not to answer
conipluiut. ignoring Troutman
criminal Mays and Valentine conflict
in all cases. Choosing a com
Sanders akü
the dirty work for missioner iii closed doors that
Divorce Lnwyerllona G renadicr would do
Ï Icckmali . That thc iss „ Cs with
thc home is oot limited to the Moi '[ goge oil
actions of Janice bllt, incl
Law Group. udes Bell Düvluro calling
in u làvor Rom BWW
Egregious Legal Errors

- 42 Participation in attcmpt
ing to basclcssly destroy
[J.S.('. jf 198/ Eq Jünicc financially. physica
ual Rights Collusion to illegally Libe llv and mentally.
l and Slander with the Blo
Under the Lai,· g jwolkgrenadierisalair.b
District offolumbia den logspot.com USDC: of
ying restraining ordcrs to
win favor in a defamatory
issued without due proc public opinion not
ess. Collusion to continu
e Libel and slander with
to protect colleagues, 0[her Judges and lawyers
Ukimate goul o f niurder
or suicide,without lega
tlìrough crüninality, in l basís and accomplishe
both jurisdictions. d
42 U.8.C. § 1983('i
vil Action Participation atte
mpting to baselcs
sly destroy Janícc.
for Deprh,atìon of Ri# Coliusion to Libc
ts in a defamatorypublic opinion
without duc proccss.
l. Slander with reli¿
šìous hate
Ultimatc goal ofmilrder, suicide
to make
22
hotneless without legal basis
and accomplished throu gh crimínality. in holli jurixdieti
the criminul actions o f Ïlonu
Gi'eii:,diet· Ileckmun u,id thosc
ons. To protect ,
in tlic '·Jttdieial, Governme
Officials" whom had ali'eady steppecl olltside the box nt n,id Elected
of { Iie law iii thu CLiver Up of
actions Lawyei· I lona's ,
Due Process Fifth & Deliberate denial o f subs

tantive n,ld procedt,ral
Fourteenth Amendment no due process systcrnicitlly
opponent o„ the basis of fa\Oring any
Socif,1 Hler:irchy to obt:,1
person "deprived of life, ,1 f:i;'or ,¥itlì tile Judician
and other Elected Offi ', the Government
cials. Colh,sion to de„y
procedural due process
liberty, or property without proceedings - not allow ill VA foreclosl,re
ing H Jury by Trial as dem
nnded b>' Jnnice for fairi
due process of law" Thnt dismissing the com ,ess in the courts.
plnint with b:iseless re:is
oning after pt·oper mot
issuance of unfounded ions atid causing the
ri,li,Igs.
Social Hierarchy -
Defined: Difïereilt acgrees
ofpower and uutllority by
Discrimination Pel'solls who believe they
in Gov't. Elected Officials are above the Ìuw :is
& Judiei:iry u'hen missed
laws for those that belie
by these persons who believe
ve they "They make the
so they do not have to arc above the law
Discrimination for being t-ollow thc same law:i"
poor, bluckcd bülkd by the
Old Boys Network
Religious Discrimination 42
USC § 2000bb First Fr,:„,i. i.•ra'Ì-:·'i' " ;/j'AÇÍ...Sli; ·1 ~Alì!.,
Amendment of US
Constitution ,
YOU C'IC,rl-1 „CLF ~JG..':

YOU ARE THE Kit'JD
THAT WOULD TUR
THEM 1N Llt.-'.Isr 'Ji ji pr?P' :.·, ~r,i[, ·-,f:,·„Ei'·,:i N
i-· T,>, ,· T,·,··r .,·4.• •!.••· l: w , ''
LILL.' Inll 'r,ll'. F,·.MIL, FLJE,ILL·*,yll-Í.1'·t
~[.';
··.t ,- ,..,,r· :,:I,-r„, ·„i,
(.Lll, .It-'· 1-i·i,
REJECTED .. •.,[. ,·.·''·.r,v tc,...,, YOU WERE
Îtf 1.· Illi I'·, ,(·,i.,6' T,·(,< t -·,,ilL,Il,) ·.,. ).,·.i ·£: 1,1:-, irli.· i-ir· . r·
~,~·' IK'. -rll, :'·P,i'E-i,
BLAMING ALL JEV
t.lr·-,1 t i,_·
JS LIKE H aTLER
FOR NOT LIVING
STREET ~' iELL ,-·ET OFF ·.Go/·· ON EASY
-i.=. ,.cir,C· ·Z· ~
f t.r.>:·r ..L t · :', „·· ,· I.Ž., tl·., ? ,-, r:.. ·.·*.' il, „.16,1. =, ;[,Y·.-,-r.C,
1·,tll , /-k· Ir' .-- '1*· ;.».: 1.I .:- T -. , .'.*
I.-
:.'
.Ilr i-•1·.fi· i.,F .· · . i,i ri,f- 1-,p:·..r r,t...·c ..,ir,i.T ,1 '·.;0.
-„.,e.,- I,· . .'
~1 Ir, t t,:"t' , *A C I ·C' -.·E· ·' IT 1 t •~· ~-$/ I · r.'ii líi.·
r·.*.-I Þ-·•' 4.-* ' ,··.I
L, J'' -•..... t,1': } í Il- ' Î~ ·>j' ·' 1 '_r· l,1, '2 ' '-'"
·
'·'·T t-
The First Amendment gu:i

rantees freedom of Religion
Gover,unent and Elected - That i,ll Bodies ot'the
Judici:,ry, the
Officitils h:„'e supported
110,1:1's I·!ATE OF CAT
HOLICS et al
Decisions made iii bad fait
h
for a corrupt purpose
All decisions and Orders
liave been done delibera
deliberately and intentionally tely k, deny I),ie Ptocess
Acts und Knowledgeable IO protect the Criminol
üelions or"FRIENDS aiìd
failing to fo!!ow the law Collelìýltes"
Extrinsic Fraud See e.g.,

Deliberately i:isuing
unfounded. baseless
Schlr,sshei'g v. Sch/a orders with the kno
wledge of the C]ct·k
çsherg, colltision to lie to
Jnniçç. Perjury. Fra of Court and
tid. Iiat'ússmenl see
343 A. 2d 234 - Md: Cou king money.
il
of Appeals 1975
Abuse of Contempt Pow

ers Collusion with oth
ers in cases to deli
VA § 18.2-456 berately deny due
process to get c.ise
(4) then ìssuing petition
s :tnd orders that
in :i contempt posture
.
do lìut
Misbchavior ofan office contempt, incarcerütion lply with thc stat
lltoiy procedure
con
r of and ìfï do not pay. ]I]egnll :ttid tlìJ'eaten
the court in his offici - Novçmber 12,2014 íbr y inc:it·cerating, torturin
al g Janice from October 22
thc hopes ofher comlnjt
character (5)Disobedie mails showing Mark Wa ting suicide when she was
nce or rner's knowledge ofthe released. to prevent e-
resistance o f an office Lawyer ilona Gren:td con·uption in the Judicia
r of the ier Heckman, for pure ry and the cover up of
abuse o!' J:mice.
court
Ex parte Commun
ications D¢liberorcly conduc
judicial Canon 3(B ting cx paste discuss
)7 their own investiga ions with opposition
tions. then us ins the and government age
¢xlrajudicicl ì,lform ncies ttnd doing
denying due proces at io 11 to is!; ue base[e
s and seeking money ss mlinus while also
for crimimll :Icts by
lawyet·s. Tllat the ham
p program
23
Virginia code of Professional
offered by tlic govcrmlient liris been
misused by the Ba!11:š and Lawyers
Conduct ignored which have been pled :md
Deformation / Libel / That in colhision with thc olhci judge

s the words ., štutemeiìts " frivolous
Slander VA Code é l 8.2 417 looking fol' li'i,olùuš law suits"
" 'Deiusioiìal . malicious &
saying Ï :Lin F:,ntastic .Ìi,LI 111I1:i
f-L,l nuttu·c l,> Gerald Bt·llcv
L¢c and
Slander and libel. 28 USC § similar saying by other Jildgcs,
J:mice has tlic dociiments and the
prooi'otcwruption by the
4101 Jttdiciary and Lawyer ilona Ely
Freedman Grenodícr Heckmuti -·
Law Ilrnìs DÌMu!0(jinsbelg aild ~
BLV\V Luw Group and Troi,t,n~n Sande
rs ul:u Mi,>·:. .Sk Vul:nli,14 :tiìd (he
Jl,dge's íi.)r tarot· are
colluding to coverup all crimi
nal acts. That the use of Deforinatío
n is becaiìse tlìe real law does tior ~
woik, bccüusc ihç LAW ís
on ihcside oflanice.
Períury VACode § 18.2-10, Thút when the Judge's signed

Orders thnt were or.tside the Ia\\'.
not true and correct that were
§ 18.2-434. § 8.01-4.3 in gtatenients they committe thlse
d Perjury . That Lawyers Ilona
Grenadier Heckman . Ben DiN,
Michael Weiser, Andrea Mosley. liìj~o .
Jitdgc ,Ioliti Ti:itz. 1!ill.try Cullyci,
lïleil clocui,ietit~ .ind mislead
tlìi5 court Obstrllctillg Justic
e witll stateinent tlìat tliev
kneiv to be unt.'lie
VA Code $ 17.105 (b) Designation of Judges to hold

courts :„,d :,ssist other Judg
es - Th:,t ill Ji,(lges in :,ll c:ises
Jnnice have been by J,idgcs by
thal did not ha,·e Jiarisdic·ti
oti nialdng all ordl·t's "VOID"
VA Codc § 18.2 - 21 An Accessory, either before or after

the fact, may. ; hether the principnl
fclon bc convicted or
i:ot, or be amei,Able to Jüstke or
not bc indicted, tried coliyicted
:I,Id 1)ittlislied iii the count, or
corporation in which he became ~
accesso,-v or in which the pri,icil}a!
VA Code § 18.2-481 fcio li mieht bi' illcliclecl.
Treason Resisting the execution ~
ot' the 1:iws under color ol' its at,tho
Treason - VA Code § 18.2- rit> . ]Í'an>, pcr'Noiì knowing t
oi' Sllch ti'cason slia]1 not. :Ìs sooil as tny be, gi~'e ilili)1'Ilia[,iìiì thei'eof to tile (}ovemor. i,i st)ine !
482 Misprision of Trcason conservator ofthepeucli he shull
b¢ guilty ofa C'Iass 6 Felony
~
VA Code § 18.2-472 Fi,löe e,itries or destructioti of
records b> officers O f the court
- When Kcinler. Dawkins anc!
Clark mailed back documellts
submitted properly into the recor
d ie Mail Fraud
October 2012 - Janice's

documents stibmilted into
the record. wlien she went
tc, eheek tliat they h:ìd
been filed - shc is told to tüke them
or they would tlil'ow tlwtn oul, Janic
e ret'itscd to tal:e them and i
then they arc m:, iled back to her
by Judge ' s Kuinler. Dawk
ins and C !: trk . The bux ., boui 4 " thick h:, s
b¢en x-ruyed a„d shows the docm
l,ents bi,t. never opelied still Ïn the
bc,\
"tl - ---**1
~ Decenibei
· / J ,itiu : il · b · tìi , e Ìi · a ,
Iie ol' 2 ( 112 & Zl) 13 t - ai , vci· Íll, IÌ. 1 Il~ COI,
others :,s :í favor or hired liì >, ll ) 11 Wkh 1
:, gentleman that goe. by the
n:ìine oI M:Irk Stli:it't who
waf to drug Janice and Ìniòi'ins Janice lie !
get
di,uwhters, or to plant clritg:isexua l inappropriate pictures
on J:Iîìiçe's daìisthtcr or in theof Janice . or to rüp ¢ one of ., Ii , iíce ' N
home to give Circuit Court .Ji,d~ i
Kemler. Dawkins and Clark, c's i
inionmtíon to m:ìke .I\VG inco
ilipeleiì! to tile :my other docu
Wr. Stuart said thc Lawyer ments. !
ilona wíll go lo any length to
harni ,Ïaiìice or J:liìic¢': dai,g
Lawyer tlona will contüiue liters. That :
to do wh.,t she can tu disttact
J:mice from becoming stìcc
moving on with Janice's e~sfu] ,itid !
life. That Lüwyer Ilona ts
n "Greedy .len'" that .,]11
arc dcliberate to causc harm .,t,v\'er Ílotio's actions
to Janice. W'he:, the Alex:I, ~
dria Pülice i, ere called the>
J:mice they ivere instructed ' informed
by Cotili,ioili,edlth Attor,ìe>
of issue. ' I~:,ttd,· Seilgel to i,ot t:Il~e ~
iìn, reports '
VA Code § 18.2-168 Forging Pi , blic Reco

rds - Ilona Cìren :idiel
· Heck tnan That „' Iìen liona
forgery of Sonia Gren u ' as in \ olved with the
adier'Ñ name in the Trus
t agreeinc,ir :ìnd the,Ì
Íorging continued to after knowmg :ind be
use stich document wilh caught
the help oiother 1_:t
#yet's. Gc,vertìtlìent uitic
mls
1
24
VA Code § 18.2-455 Conduct illegal by an attorney at law or any pet'son
holding license from commonwealth to
Unprofcssional Conduct: engage iii a profcssion in unproíbssionül
revocation of license Conduct
§ 9. 1 - 600 Civilian A. State, local, and other public law enforc

ement agencies, which have ten or more law
enforcement
Protc©tion in cases of officcrs. shall have procedures as establislìed
in subsection B. allowing citizeo submission of
complaints regarding the conduct ofthe law
police misconduct : enforcement agency. law enforcement officer
s iii thc
agency. or employees of the agency.
Minimum standards
B . Law enforcement agencies shall ensui
' e , at o minimumi that in thc case of all
writtcn complaints :
1. The gcneral public has üccl:55 to thc
required fonns and information concerning
the submission of
complaints;
2. The law enforcement agency assists individ
uals in filing complaints; und i
3. Adcquate records are maintained ofthe
nature and disposition ofsuch cases.
The Scheme involved the policc. That divorc

e luwyur Ilona Grcnadier lied to the police and
Clark ignored such criminal acts which come Judgc
under Obstruction úf Justice which Judge
empowered by quashing thc Subpoena for eviden Clark
ce to prove further the collusion and corruption of
all.
§ 18.2-434 - PERJURY BY
Judge James Clark LIED, in court on
April 27,2016 - June 8.2016 and June
JUDGE JAMES CLARK 22.
2016 -His relationship with Butke and Herbe
rt Bank, his financial relationship with
Burke and Herbert bank. Judge Jame
s Clark has obstructed Justice as he calls
it for
his "Friendships"
25
LWk &
i
AO 91 (Rev. l l/l l) Crìnti,nnl Complaint
UNI-FED STATES DISTR

ICT COURT
fur thc
lüstcrn Disi,·ict of Virginìu
Divorce Lawyer Ilona

Grenadicr Heckman )
Erika Grenadier Lewi )
s
Ca,c No.
David Mark Orenadier
)
)
)
D,Ji·'Uiani (ä)
CRIMINAL COMPLAINT
I, thc complainant in this
cnsc, statc that the follo
wing is truu lo thc best
o f' my 1.nowledgc amd bctic
On or about thc datc(<) f.
oí
- --/--/ - I in thc county uf City of Alexandria
___
Eastern Dislrict of hi the
__ . .~!rgirlla. _ , the dercndalll(s) viútuled
:
Code Sec{Ìcm
Oflìli~se Dcsci·iptiult
See Attached Page 2 - 14

Perjury, Fraud on the Cou
rt, Conversion and Theft
with Sonia Grenadier on of Real Estate starting
or before November of 198
3, Janice Wolk Grenadier
February 14, 1986 from on or around
This crimiìì.,l complai

nt is based on tlies
c facts:
Documents, Accountings,
Deed, Trust agreement
s, Copies of Checks, Let
Deed ofTrust, Partnersh ters, Outlines of Proper
ip agreement, Divorce ty,
Degree with no Property
in the court that are ridd Settlement, Documents
led with lies by lawyer filed
Ilona and her lawyers, A
without Janice's signat Liquidation Agreement
ure by a lawyer not lice done
nsed in Virginia.
W Uontmucil un the ült:,checi
1
sheet.
C'l,11*i mt, „t,1 < 'ã S{gnu

-Í { *L d (ÁM Ag~24~ ~
1'*Lc»_ _
1·e
L»A'98 Wolk Grenad

ler / VICTIM
12,·, IL'(i 'til,Ii, iâ „4/ lilli,
Sworn to before me itid
signed in my prescticc.
Datc:
A/KC'ó .ïign Um,·C

City and statc:
1" bue,1 Il,/,il, (uld t/iíe

Criminal Complaint against Divo
rce Lawyer Ilona Ely Freedma
daughterto Ilona Orenadìerw n Grenadier Hcckman and Erik
ho in or around Fcbruary a Ely Grenâ(tier Lewis of Calif
4, ! 985 with Ilona's first lic ornia /
Of the property by all appearan about Bristow Road and the
ce as well as the property from money she stole our
in or around March of 1985 Soni a Grenadicr mothcr to the late
. Ilona then married Jcromc Judge Albert Grenadier who
"Jcrry" Heckman - Albert's had died
KellerHeckman an Internatio much hated l s' cousin Fou
nal law firm. Erika became nding partner of
involved in the collusion docu
mented on or around Novemb
er of 1997.
Date Court
Case No. Description 1
October 5,1999 City of Alexandria CH99-1253

Divorce Janice Wolk Grenadier
David Grenadier Divorce Granted wíth
no Property
April 20,2001 Settlement agreement
City of Alexandria
CH01 - 0654 The Money owed for the
10-11-2011 City of Alexandria Bellcfonle Partnership
M011001482 Grand Jury
10-20-2011 USDC ofVirginia
1:11-cv-01136 GBL
- JFA
01-31-2014 USDC of District
1:14-cv-00162 LLM Loreta Lax Miller
ofColumbia
07-29-2013 USDC of District 1:13-cv-01152 UNA
1 Spring Street
of Columbia
07-02-2014 USDC o f Virginia
1:14-cv-00827 LMB- Spring Street - Stayed as of Sept
ember 29,2016 in the 4'h
TCB Circuit under an En Banc accepted
0440-2014 City of Alexandria
CL 1400 - 2193 Lis Pendens
03-13-014 Prince William CL 1400-2185
County
Lis Pendens
& 1400 - 2185-01
09-15-2015 City of Alexandria
CLISOO - 3661 Illegally brought suit for Legal
fees that were gotten through
FRAUD ON THE COURT
11-12-2015 USDC of Virginia 1:15-cv- 01497 GBL Rico & Racketeering Stayed
as of Sçptcmbcr 29 , 2016 (he
- IDD 48 Circuit under an En Banc
accepted
The following links will con

firm the criminal Activity
and how it has been ignored
:
JWG Links - Video
Update October 28
, 2016
June 22, 2016 Janice Cir

cuit Court of the City of
James Clark states he and Alexandria VA - exposing
Carter Land were Truste the corruption - Judge
Friendship as he did on Jun e's on all of Burke and He
e 8, 2016. That Judge Cla rbert Loans for
fro m Burke and Herbert band rk further stated no financi
directly or indirectly. Which al compensation
& Herbert from his law firm must mean the lawyer represe
would have had to do it nting Burke
Is a "Shame Hearing" - for free - "friendship" stil
Judge Clark States - "No l illegal. Janice states this
t on this side" sjnce wh
en does Judge's take sid
es?
https:üyoutu.be/Lo
5U4Frvdwl
In May of 2016 learne

d that Judge Clark had
the conversation with a financial relationship
the FBI that has ignore - I contacted the FBI and
d it: here is
https:üyoutu.be/D
bdcVaZkltQ
These two videos

show that I spoke wit
h Gov. Terry McAuliffe
Box of evidence that and Brian Moran an
d showed him my
2
https://youtu.be/kQlhRnaxvRc
Janice Exposes the Corruption

of the City of Alexandria Nazi Virgi
$$$$ Justice nia the place Terrorist's can Buy
https:Hyoutube. com/wa
tch?v=qh BZLmVynX
c
Janice Wolk Grenadier asking

/ exposing Mark Warner for
the 3rd time havingthe disc
he lied. ussion
DSCF0005 - Jailed so Senator Marl<

Warner could be Re-elected and
https://youtu.be/rlìslcBEYAJQ
DSCF0039 Mark Warner Exposed
as he Lies about what he knows -
https://youtu.be/010opcNIqNA YouTube
These Videos are the tapes of

Janice Wolk Grenadier Standing
Alexandria Council Meeting UP and speaking out at the City
of
June 2016 COA Council

Meeting COA June 18,2016 Council Mee
ting exposing Judge James Clark
https://youtu.be/MXa5aVqLPP
I
June 2016 Burke & Herbert Bank -

Lying to me about the subpoen
a and that he had noideal was
come today after I had already to
had a conversation with ano
ther person there.
https:Uyoutu.be/glsnNJogVko
October 2016 City Cou

ncil Meeting further exposing the corruption
https://youtu.be/vNKZD4a_6F in the City of Alexandria
w
October 2016 - City of

Alexandria Council Meeting -
These two tapes show the Fina
activity ncial Questionable
https://youtu.be/GaN!8TEzWL
M
and
The disclosure of the City Cor
ruption in the finances - Priv
ate School $70,000 -for tenn
$400,000 for tennis courtš - is courts - COA funded
the City Paid Šl.6 Million
September 2016 City Council

Meeting https ://youtu . be/ lrslz20Th7A
Right with Crime . CSPAN

- Talking about the Corr
uption with Judges https ://youtu . be/ IYMGULFTfM
O
CATO - Judge Merrick Gar
land https :// youtu . be / IVI UoBWr
lvQ
February 2016 - The

$ 602 , 000 SCAM of the
JIRC https ://youtu . be/ po [16u
HhSLXM
DSCF0008 - The Mortgage
Crisis - Eric Holder Eric
Holder and the SCAM
https://youtu.be/G on the American People
jaZ6a--aRM
DSCF0042 Citv of Ale

xandria Council Me
etina Januarv 2016
- YouTube
3
https://youtu. be/IZG00480vlo
DSCF0047 Citv of Alexandria Citv Coun

cil Meetinq December 2015 - YouTube
https://youtu.be /ydgqzlukExE
DSCF0048 Citv oí Alexandria Côun

cil Meeting November 2015 - YouT
https://youtu.be/OmJWgr_qf28 ube
DSCF0050 City of Alexandria Cou

ncil Meeting October 2015 - You
https://youtu.be/cqJSDcHG53c
Tube
DSCF0051 City of Alexandria

Council Meeting September 2015
https://youtu.be/qGavoOLEcRY - YouTUbe
DSCF0055 Citv of Alexandria Cou

ncil Meetlna June 2015 - YouTub
https://youtu.be/2qAc_YqdVUw e
DSCF0056 City of Alexandria Cou

ncil Meeting May 2015 - YouTub
https://youtu.be/2qAc_YqdVUw e
httos://www.voutube.com/watch
?v=poQ6uHhSLXM City of Alex
andria $602,000 Scam Council
Meeting Feb 2016 - https://youtu
.be/poQ6uHhSLXM
httos://www.voutube.com/watch?v=G
DZ8UkJv781 Cato Question where
Powell- Licensed to Lie - On July to go for Help with Sydney
25, 2014 Janice Wolk Grenadier aske
when your Due Process rights as an d "Where do you go for help
American Citizen are violated?' You
answer will be shocked by the
https:#youtu.be/GDZBUkJv781
We send young men and women into

harms way to fight for rights that we
American Citizens, It is very scary and no longer have as
until you are involved in a Slippery Slop
Corruption of the Judicial System e of the Collusion and
- it is difficult to understand.
The entire event can be heard

at http://cdn.cato.org/archive-201
4/cbf-...
Read more at :
• JAMJustice.ora
• www,ProSeAmerica.net
• @ProSeAm
• Facebook.com/JAMJustlce
l
• Facebook.com/jwgre
nadler3
• Facebook.com/ProS
eAmerica
• Facebook.com/PSA.Yo
ur State Name
• www.ProSeAmerica.b
logspot.com
That the law Is very clea

r: That Judge Clarks
actions have turned
someone under Tltle 42 back time. Giving me
US Code 1994 and less rights then a slav
Title 18 US Code 1581 e. Taking
condition of PEONAG ( a ): Whoever holds or
E, shall be fined und returns any person to
erth]5 title for Impriso a
ned not more than 20
years or both. That on
October
4
22, 20141 was placed in jail for failure to
pay legal fees in 30 days which is a violati
on of my Thirteenth Amendment
"Neither Slavery not Involuntary servit
ude, except as punishment for a crime
where of the party shall have duly
convicted, shall exist within the United
States, or any subject to their Jurisdiction"
. Furthermore the right by placing me
"under" a state Peonage/ Involuntary
Servitude violating the Fourth Amendmen
t right by malicious prosecutíon, false
Imprlsonmentand unconstitutional arrest
. This violation of my Eight Amendmen
t Right as to Excessive Bail which in this
case constitutes "Restltutlon Ball" which
further shows the knowledgeable mal:c
ious intent to sìlence me till the electi
was over on November 4th . 2014 . Bias on
, Retaliation and Retribution to furth
er line the Lawyers pockets by Judge
Clark .
Further: The system Is one wher

e the Lawyers and Judges have
set ìt up to protect each other
and line each others
pockets with Cash.
December 2015 - Defendant

Janice Wolk Grenadier Stands up and
speaks out against the Criminal Acts of
Dawkins In Regard to his re-appoint Judge Nolan
ment - In front of the Courts of Justic
e ìn the Virginia Legislature - Sever
Vlctims also stood up and spoke out al other
aboutthe criminal actions of other
Virginia Judges Courts of Justice A
Elected Officials / Lawyers who group of
practice In front of these Judge
s
VOTED ALL JUDGE'S BACK INTO THER

E POSITIONS KNOWING THE CRIM
INAL ACTS & ACTIONS OF THE JUDG
ES
The Professional Code of Responsibil

ity of the Lawyers on the Courts of
Justice Rule 8 . 4 Misconduct It is professional
misconduct for a lawyer to:
(a) violate or attempt to violate the

Rules of Professional Conduct, know
ingly assist or induce another to do
so, or do so through the acts of anot
her;
(b) commit a criminal or deliberate
ly wrongful act that reflects adve
rsely on the lawyer's honesty.
trustworthiness or fitness to prac
tice law;
(c) engage in conduct involving dish
onesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresent
ation which reflects adversely on
the lawyer's fitness to practice
law;
The Courts of Justice further - GUA

RANTEES THE JUDGES against com
plaints being investigated by HAN
SELECTING THE JIRC ( The Judiciall D
nquiry and Review Committee whe
re complaints are filed against Judg
- and never Investigated - Read Mor es
e at www.proseamerica.blogspot
.com the $602,000. SCAM on the
Virginia Citizens
Guaranteeing all Judge's the abili
ty to Ignore the law and rule to
protect their own and as Judge
stated very clearly to his goo Clark
d friend Attorney Michael
Weiser
"1 HAVE NO CHOICE BUT TO

LET HER OUT OF JAIL, 1 AM
SO SORRY I CANNOT COLL
YOU" ECT YOUR LEGAL FEES FOR
The Appearance and the

collusion is that all Judges
In the State of Virginia have
"You Scratch my Back, l will a Secret "Handshake" of
line you pockets with WIN
S in the court room for you
me Lunch or Dinner or r Clients - Call me - Buy
what ever -but, we will
notturn on our own"
So what about those young

Men and Women who go
off to war to fight for the
Give's Americans of Due Rights our Constitution
Process?
www.Valaw2010.blogspot
.com
www.Scrlbd.com/Vlrglnlala
w
Rico Information: Com

plaint:
https://www.scribd.com
/doc/303506666/RicoRaci-
2-v-4-FI NAL-JWG-v Complaint-o
ctober-17-20 15
5
Documents the Back up the
Claims:
httos://www.scrlbd,com
/doc/303508177/USDC-VA
-Exhibits-for-Rico-Racker
inR-Jan-6-2015
This picture / email says it all.
From: Reza. Mohsln [niatlto:n

l olisifi, f ez a:0: trotitn ì .:ií ,
5-nt: Thuriday. JJnu.J,y 29. ~:.t,cle,·s.c or, A
2016 12,21 PM
To: Hiba Gårsl: <HGirg:
süà' pskfirni. coin>: Andrea Mo5eley
Ccs Urta , Andy YAndy.
Uriaig) iroutil , ans; aj , diurs
<atnc) 5,-,Iey, 2,( liri,ttrci.C *.,ð' 1 l
uoutmansanders.ccm. . i on -p.: Thorr, pfon , Ash
ley . #.. 1 t , i - , /T hiyr ,) I , 2.
tv , 3'
Subj•ct: Grenadler,
et a!. v. Grenadler,
et al . - Case N o.
CL 15003661
Hello, Heba and And
rea:
I ;ust recened Janlce's

vA,Zten statement thou
g], tt appoars Lo Iu,+1 t;wer
gobng to note an obiect,on i :n:u!·*a 1*n D.e·.,mibe'
or lust let Judga Clark 28 Ai. ~ 9 l.1 -U,
deal #,th ,(-)
Thanks.
S. Mohsin Re
za I TROUTM
AN SANDER
1850 Towers cre S LLP
scent Plaza. Su
ire 500, Tysons
Tel: (703) 734-4351 Corner, virginia 22182
i Fax: (703) 448-65
10
fnohsin. reze,(a) trc}
t,[nnansa nclers c:o
n)
Law / Code Description
~
Bill of Rights
1. Freedom of speech
2. Freedom o f worship
3. Freedom from wan
t
United States Amendment I The First Amendment guarantees freed

Constitution
oms concerning religion, expression,
assembly, and the right to petitì
IReligion, Speech, Press, on. It forbids Congress from both
promotino
one relioion over others and also
restrictinq an individual's religious
, Assembly, Petition (1791)] Dractiçes. It guarantees freedom
of exoression by prohibiting Cong
(see exDIanationì ress from
restricting the press or the rights ôf indivi
duals to speak freely. It also
guarantees the right of citizens to
assemble Deaceaòly and to petitio
n their
oovernment
Amendment IV
The right of the people to be secu
re in their persons, houses, pape
rs,
and effects, against unreasonable
searches and seizures, shall not
be violated, and no Warrants
shall issue, but upon probable
cause,
supported by Oath or affirmation
, and particularly describing the
plâco to be searched, and the
persons or things to be seize
d.
The Fourth Amendment originally
enforced the notion that "each man'
is his câstle", secure from unre s home
asonable soorches or,d ôeiz
ures oí properly by
the government. It protects
against arbitrary arrests, and
is the tasjs oí the
law regarding search warrants
, stoo-and-frisk, safety inspection
and other forms oí surveillan s, wiretaps,
ce, as well as being central
to many other criminal
law topics and to privacv la~l
Fifth Amendment [Grand
Jury, Double The Film Amendmen[ creates a numb
Jeopardy, Self-lncrlmlnatlon er of riohts relevant to both crimin
, Due proceedings. In çriminal cases al and civil legal
Process (1791)] (see exc , the Fifth Amendment guara
lanaüpn ntees the righl to a grand
jwfí, forbids 'double ieooardy," and
protects against self·incriminatlon
that 'due process of law' bž.Ë . It also requires
ålofar:Qrogeeding-thâlde
niei.icltjzen"liíe-!&2&2t
6
property' and requires the gove
rnment to compensate citizens
when it takes private
Dropertv for public use
V The Sixth Amendmenl Ouaranlees the rights
oí criminal defendants, including (he right
lo 8 public trial without unneçessar
v delav, the riclht to a lawyer, the
Sixth Amendment ÍCriminâl Prose riqht lo an impartial
cutions j!¿LV, and the riohl lo know who
vour accusers areand the nature
- July Trial, Right to Confront of the çharges and
and to evidence against you. It has been
moit visibly tested Ìn a series ol
cases involving
Counsel (1791)] (see exolanatio terrori5m, but much more often figures
n in cases that ìnvolve (Íor example)
or the protection of witnesses, includ jury selection
ing victims of sex crimes as well
as witnesses in
need ol protection from retaliation
Vll In Suits at common law, where
the value in controversy shall
exceed twent y
dollars, the right of trial by jury
Seventh Amendment [common shall be preserved, anú no fact
Law líiøl by a
jury, shall be otherwise re-examin
Suits-Jury Trial (1791)] ed in any Court of the United
States, than
acco rding lo Ilìe ru:es O< lhe
(See ÊÄQ[â[!âlbü commôn law.
The Seventh Amendment continues a practice

from English common law of
distinguishing çivíl claims which must
be tried before a iwa (abser,t waive
r by the
parties) from claims and issues
that may De heard by a #dqe alone.
governs federal cívil courts and has It only
no applica:Ion to civil courts sel up by
the
states when those courts are
hearing only U,spules OÍ ilitlg_
Vlll !âl
Excessive bail shall not be requir
ed, nor excessive fines imposed,
nor cíuel
and unusual punishrnenls inflicted.
Elahth Amendment [Excess Baìl or
Fines, Cruel and Unusual Punishment
(1791)1 (see exvlana Most often mentioned in the context of
tlon the dcath penalty. the Eighth Amendment
prohibits cruel and unusual punishments
, but also mentions "excessive fines"
and kâi!, The "exçessive Íines clauöe
surfaces (among other places) in cases
of gïj!
and criminal forfeiture, for examp
le when property Is seized dunno
IX a drug raid.
The enumeration in the Constilulion
, of certain rights. shall not be
construed to deny or disparage
others retained by the Keople
Ninth Amendment [Non-Enumerated
Rights (1791)] (see explanation) The Ninth Amendment was James Madiso
n'S attempl lo ensure that thie Rili 01
Riohts was not seen aš granting to
the people of the United Sta:es only
the specific
rights it addressed. in recent years,
some have Interpreled it as aííirmi
of such ünenumerated" fíghts outsíd ng the existençe
e tnose exoressly protected- bv the
X Bill of Rights
The powers not delegated lo the
United States by the Constitution
, not
prohibited by it to the States, are
Tenth Amendmenl [Rights Reserved to reserved to lhe States respectively
, or to
States or People (17 the people.
91)]
(Bee explanation
The Tenth Amendment heips to deíine
the concept oí Íedemli;m, the relation
ship
between Federal and state governments
As Federa] acl,vity has increased, so toe
has
tile problem of reconciling state and
national interests as they apply lo the
Federal
powers to tax, to poliçe, and to regula
tions such as wöqe and hour laws,
disclosure of
personal information in recordkeeping
svstems, and laws íelated to stno-r.in,nq.
Amendment XIII
Section 1.
Qällßlghtã Neithor slavery nor Involuntary servitu

dc, except as a punishment tor cíime
party shall have been duly convicted, whereof lhe
Enforcement Power shall exist within the United States,
subject !0 their lurlsdiction. or any place
Section 2.
Congress shall have power to enforc

e this article by appropriate legisla
Fourteenth Amendment tion
The Fourteenlh Amendmen! addre
sses many aspects of citizenship
and Ihe rights of
citizens. The most commonly used
-- and kequen':ly 11!igated - phras
amendment is "eQual orolection e in the
of Ihe lawf, which Íigures prom
inently in a wide
variely ol landmark cases, includ
ing Brown v. Board of Education
(racial
discrimination), Roe v. Wade(repro
ductive rights), Bush v. Gore (electi
recounts),Reed v. Reed (gender on
discrimination), and Un,veísily
of Cahfornia v.
Bakke (racial quotas in educ
ation). See more...
Section 1. Allpersonsborn orna

turalízedinthe United States,
jurìsdiclion thereof, are citizens andsubjectto the
of the United Slales and of lhe
state wherein they
reside. No state shall make
or enforce any law which sha!1
abridoe the pnvileqes or
7
immunilies ofckizens of the Uníted States: nor shall
any state deprive any person of
life, liberly, or property, without due process of law:
nor deny tc any person within its
jurisdiction the equal protection of the lows.
Section 2. Representa'.ives shall oe apportloneö among the

several stales
according lo tnøír respective number3,
counting the whole number oí peísons
In each
state, excluding Indians not taxed. But when
the right to vote al any election for the
choice of eleclors for President and Vice President of tho
United Stoles,
Representatives In Congress, the executive and
judicial officers of a state, or the
members of the legislature thereof, ìs denied lo
any of the male inhabitants of such
state, being twenty-one years of age, and citizens
of the United States, or ín any way
abridged, except for participation In rebellion, cr other
crime, the basis of representation
thorein shall be reducod ìn the proportion which
the number oí such male citizens shall
bear to the whole number of mâle citizens twenty·on
e years of age in such stale.
Section 3. No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress

, or eleclor
of President and Vice President, or hold any office, civil
or military, under the United
States, or under any state, who, having previously taken
an oath, as a member of
Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member
of any slate legislature,
or as an executive or judicial officer of any stale, to support
the Consdtution of the
United Slates, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion
against the same, or
given aid or comfort lo the enemies Iheíeoí. But
Congress may by a vote oí Iwo·thirds
i oí each House, remove such disabilily.
Section 4. The validity of tne public debt of the United States,

authonzed by law,
Including debts incurred for paymenl of pensions and bounties
br services in
suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not
be questioned. But neither the United
States nor any state shall assume or pay any dem or obligation
incurrød in aid óí
insurreclion or rebellion against the United States,
or any claim for the loss or
emancipation of any slave; but all such debts, obligatio
ns and claims shall be held
illegal and void.
Section 5. The Congress shall have power to eníorce, by apocopfìa

te legislation,
the provisions of this artjc!e.
Virginia Virginla Artlcle I . Bill

of Rightä A DECLARATION OF IGGI '] S inadc
by ( Ì , e good people oí Virginia in rhe excrc
Constitutional Rights : se of tlìcir sovci · eign
powers, wh:ch righu do pertain to thcm and thelr posferity, ns the basis
and foundation of govcrnincnl.
Scçtion 1 . Equality and rights

of men. Thai c U men are by nalure eq :, a lyfree
and í„ depende , ií irnd
which, when they ent• ri,ito a sta :ø ofsocie ha ve ce ,·tain ínhe )·en t rights , of
:y, they cunnol, by üny compuc {, deprlve
Itbe,·(y. with the means ofacq or dzves { ( he :}· poster .il)'¿ nan·,ely. the
uiring and possessing property. enjoyiìieniof life md
and pursuing
and obminm g happi nes. (: d s< dè (y.
Sectlon 2. People the source of powe

r. That all power is vested in. and conseq
trustees and servants, and ac all limes ueli [ Iy deri\,ed jì·om, the people , ihw magistr
amenabìe to them. ates are their
Section 3 . Govcrnment tnstttut

ed fur common benctit,
l'ha{ goveri:me,it is. or
and securtty of the people, nation. ought to be. : nstilwedfor the common beneßt , prutectioll.
or comi„
nity, ofall (he vuriotcî „iodes üiîd jorins
productng
:ho g}·oat,s: degrce of happinesi and safety, a,td of äover}tmi, n:, tjio: tä best which w wpubit
iä most e#ec{ualty secitred agains of
whenever t , he danger oj m <: Ìnd», Im¿:
any governmmit shall befound inadequate or co „ira Iration; a„, l,
inaltenable, and Ind,Jeas ry io i
lblo rig): i to reform, alter, ]~ese pu,·pos es. ü ?najo ,·tly of the (. oüttn xi. ity hath
or ebolish it, m such mannei· as a}i i„dìibitabie.
shall beJudged most conducive
io the pitblie weal.
Section 4. No exclusive emolu

ments or privileges; office
s not to bc hiredil,ry.
That no inati. or set ofmen
. is entitled to exclusive
o,· ãeparute enioluments
or privileges Ji-o}n
services : which not being dcscen :he cü}),},lìttuly, imi il:
co:isícle,·atioit oí ptit}llc
dlble, neither ought (he oßìce
s of ìn,igiàtr(
tie, legislator, or Judge io be he }·edu,trÿ,
Section 5. Separation ofleg

islatiye, executive, und judic
ial departments; periodical
That the iøgtslatív¢, execut clcctlons.
ive, andjudicial depa
rt ,nentä of lhe Cominonwualih shouid
may be restrained be separate
from oppression, byfeelìng and participating a,td distìnct, ui ,d dia: tile membe
the bw·ihens ofthe people, thcy ähould, üt rs thereof
private statio
„, reiurn into that body from jìxed periods, be reduced to u
which they were ongínally taken , and
or any part of the formor { he vctcwick.s be
menibers shalì be juppliecl by egulür dectìons, in whic h cill
ugain eiíziblc, oi · t,iel ,gíbte
, os : he luws may dìrect.
Section 6 . Free elections

; conscnt of governed . Tlia [ all
elections oi ,xhz
permangnt co,nmon interest
with, and ottach,neiti to, the co , fo befree : and thai all men, /mvi, ig ,·u #ici: i : t evidc, tce of
damažed i}4 their property nmunily, hü .e the righ{ Qf ài,Jfì·(4;e, utid ca,uiot be iüxed.
jor
public uses, with
out their ow }1 conse
or deprìved of. or
nt , or th,It oj ' 1 ]teir upi ·escilta
tì. cs duiy elected . t:,· l, ol., 3
,1 by ct ,t~ , tuw lo
8
which they have not, i,i líke m,tiuier, {usented for {he pub[ Íc
good.
Section 7. Laws shouldnot bc suspended. Thoi a // po , tc ,· ofsuspendi:,g laws. or Ihe execution a

ofla,vs. by ,i)· oullìoi·i !)•, witl, oui coi:se .i
of the represemafives of the people, ìs ínjuricniä {o theb· i · ig),{ s , ünd ought not to be exercised.
Section 8. Criminal pro3ccutlons. Thal i,I cri,ninül prosec,E,io,Ls ü man hath a right io deinand the cause and
natu,·e of his accusation, to
be confro,tt¢d wtth the accwe s ünd witnesses, and Lo c·uli for cvidemce i liís f<¿ vo}·, ü} td he shült enjoy Uie righ; to a speedy and public
triû !.
by an impar:ialjury ofhis vicinage. without whose unan i,nous consent he cannot be found guilty, He shall not be deprived of life or liberty,
except by the law ofthc tand or the judgment of his peers, nor be compelled w, any crimìnat proceeding to give evidence against himself, nor
be put twice injeopardy for (he same oífe,ise.
Laws may be enacted providingfor the trial ofo#enses notfelonious by a court not of record
without ü jury. preset ·v. ng the right oj the
accused to an appeal to aid a trial byjury in so,ne court ofrecord having original cri,ninül jurisdiction.
Laws may also provide for juries
consisting ofless tl: a ,i twelve, but no{ less than jìve, Jbr ihe trial ofo#eîîsgv not jèìonioms, and may clûääüy such
cas·es. cind prescribe ihe
number ofjurors Jor each class. In crtmí}îal cases, the c:ccused moy plead guilty. lí fhe accu:,cd plead not guitty. he iîwy, with his conxeìì:
and the coiìcurrence of die Co,n,nonwealth's A ttorney altd Ofthc court entered ofrecord,
be tried by a sniüller îmmber ofjurors. or waive ù
jury. In case of such waiveror plea of g,ji[{y, the cow ·,
31~(: 11 try (he case .
The provisions ofthis section shüll be self-executing.
Section 8 - A . Rights of victims ofcrime . That ìn c) imi,ial prosecwions, the v ,ciím shaìì be accorded fairness ,
ollìcers, emplo d ,g, 1 ' Ü, and respect b)' rhe'
yees and agentä ofthe Coinmonwea!(h aiul its political subdivisions and oßìcers of ihe courts
and, ns the General Assembly
maydef ,ie and provide by lü,v, maybe accorded rightá
to ,·eûsonuble and app, opria [ e nottc e. tnforî, iu ( ío , i. r es [
Í iwtiun . p ozec:ion . and (, ccess
to a meaningft, I role in the c,i,ninal These rights may incll
Justice process. ,dc, b„ i not be luniced ¿o. Lhc following:
1.Thc n'ghi io prot«ctton from jürlher hdi·m o,· rcpl·isal ihi·oi,gl~ tjte i,npositioi, oj app, opriaíe bail üid coiditioná
uj releaäe:
2. The right to be trecikd wlch respect, digiìliy aììd Jüírtiess (]t Gll s {
Qges of Lhe ci 'ilniliu í justice s),siei ,i
O 3 . The right to address the circuit cour{ w the
time sentence ìs imposed,
O 4 . The righl io receive tinieiy notijkation ofjkdicíül proceedings :
0 5. The right to restitution,
0 6. Theright to be advised of release from cuátody or escüpeoftheofendør, whether befo ,·e or afterdispoáition; and
O 7. The right to confer with the prosecution.
This søction does not confer upon any person a right [o
appeal or modify any decision in a crímmal proceeding, does not abridge any other
right guaranieed by tl:e Constitution of tlie United Stütes or this Coi,Sik,il,Oli, a,id doe.s not
creüte nity cause oj uct:oi, Joi· co,npe,isat,c>n o,·
damages against the Commonwealth or üny ofi:s political subdivísio ,is, any
ojjicer, c,Iiploi,cu or age}It of : 1;e Cu»ij;ioi~wcüttlt or
political subdìvislons, or any ojjìcer of the court. any of ilä
The amendment ratified November 5,1996 and effeciíve Jaiuw·y 1.]997-Added u
sec{Ío) (ä-A)
Section 9, Prohlbltlon of excesslvø búil lànd fines, cruel and unusual punishment,
suspension of habeus co,·plis, bills ofnttl,indei·, and
CX post facto laws.
ll,a: excessive bail o,iglu not (o be requíred. nor excessive Jìites
imposed, Iior ct·uei and umtsual pu,iísi~ilie,its i,Úlicted: lh(ti
:Iie p,·,vilege o;
the wriz of habeas corpus shall not be suspended unless when, i,j cases of il~vciäic,n or rebel on,
the p„blic safety may reqwre; (lnd A uf the
General Assembly shall not pass any bill of attaínder, or üny ex pnxtfacto
law.
Section ]0, General warrat,ts of searcl, or seizure prohibited. That Zeneral warrants..Ihereby íi)1 ojfice,· ü,· m,x.ei,8.r inny be
com,na„ded ro seai·ch äuspecred piaces wtthow
evidence of a fact committed, oi· lo selze al,), perso)1
ot· persolìs nut lìü}nvd. or whose ofje},se
is not particularly described and supporied by evidence.
are gricvojis and oppressive, ond uughi Hot to be granted.
Section 11. Due process of la,i'; obllgution of contracts; tíìking or diå:iìagìtig

of pr-ivatc property; prohibjtl:d discrinilnntlon; Jury trial
In civil cã , es . That no person shall be ofhls We, líberiy, or
not pai : ai ,y
law Ì:npairi
deprwed property without due pi ·ocess oj la,v; t,Ktt the Gene}·al Anembly sh, 1 / l
.8 thi obli<I # i.,i of con {·oc{*, Ii~J
f/iw ; MI rig/,& /o bc Jiec fi uin a „y go vcr„„,c„{u ¿ diöcrtnìín,Izfo,1 up On Lhc b< 13 { j üj
refigious convidion , i ·ace , color , sex , or natío „aî o rigin shall not be ab,·idg: d. c.„·epl th, 1 the
m ei · e s,1„ m 6 , of Ute ,·exes xh„ N noi be
considered dijcrtmí,iatto:1.
Rar fn cotitroversiqs respecting property, and i)1 suits between mun and ma, L trid by jury Ìs
prcfercilde io aiîy other . .md ought to bc held
sacrêd. The General Assembly
may limit (he number ofjurors for civil CQS'es ÍI courls of record io not
That the Generat Asse ,nbly shall pass no law whereby priva les'S fhG , i jì~'e
[ e proper\y, the righ{ (o which isfundamental, shall bc damaged or taken except
Jòr public use. No privaie properíy shall be damaged or take „ for
public .w ,„ irhow just con,pensa ¿ ion tu A: o „„ e,· th: r:«f. No mor·
c pr : vc,tc
property may be taken than necessary to ach [eve the smied public wse. Just coinpensaíion
shoi l be no less thcm the value 4 Ihe properly
token, lost proßtâ and lost access,
and dalnages [o the residue caused by {he itiki,ig. The lerms "lost p,·oíìts"
deßned by (he Generell /1*sentbiy, A public service compüny. ü,td "lost access " ü,·e to be
public ,se ,·vice corpo ,·a: io,L or railroad
Íorpublic wse when sudi exe,·cise is Jor the authori excrci, es the power ofelnincnt domain
zed provision ofutility, common earríer or railroad
or damaging ofprivate prope ,·ty isnot for public use if the , serriceö. In ull oiher caáü, ü tuking
primary use is for private gain , private benejìt. prirate enterprise, increüsìi,g
increasi/Ig fax revenue, oreconomicdeve/opinent, except jobs,
*r the e /i,iIi' notiolz ofop¿, blt'c ,li, i . wti : ce existi , ig ú , z :/, e prupei
bears the burden ofproving tlial
·ü ·. Th e c· ui :dei , l / lm ~
the uäe is public, witlioui u presuinp
íio,t 1]iüt it is.
The amendmem ratified November 6. 2012,
and e#ective Jam,ary j , 2013 - in thc hcadi}ig Qf
lhe section. ajle,· "takìni '. added "or
damaging: In paragraph one, after "contracts ", deleted
", nor any law wherebyp,·ivate property shall be taken
without jusf comp,nsation, the tcrm 'public uèe)' oi · damaged for public uses.
co be defined by the General
Assembly". Added a new parûgraph Qjler paragraph two.
Section
press are11 Freedom
umong ofspeech
[ he greut uild
bi, lwarks o f ( he press , Nüht Pl' aeeably to * suntble , :l , ld to petition . / i ,u ¿ the j 'reedonis of speech (md of the
speak, wrtia, and pi,bltsh hiz; s#}i ti,}~e of hberty, and ca ,i i,ever ba resrru : itcd excep ¢ by deipo [( c Aovc „ imeitts , that a ,Vy cm: en 'n cu ' j'i .ee /.'
} s on ulÌ subJect s. bei„
pass anylaw abridging { h« g responsible for ihe abuse oj thw ng} il : thut Ihe General Asseînbly shan not
freedowi oíspeechür of the press, nor the rixhí o Ahe penc·eabiv 1 „ u.m„ b.!e . and iu pezitioi, üì~
pe <'ì,Ìe
9
governmeni for me redress o.f grie \, ü : ices .
Section 13. Militia; standing Grmles: military subordinate to civil power.

1 hat a wetl }'eguta ted milit,a. compused of the b„dy ol th.,
pcopk,
trumed {o arms, is { he proper, ),(ìtu al, ünd safe defèlìse oj afree *ate. ìherefoí ·e , ! he right of ÙI € peo p!e u , keep un .i bear urms shcdl
nol be inftinged; {Itat standing arìnies, in time ofpeace , slìo,ild
be civoìded as dc„tgeroi,s to libe,·ty : ,~, d tl,m ín Gil 9 (I .Çes
be mder strict subordination io, und governed Ilìe nniliíü ,·.\· äju,uld
by, the civil power.
Section 14. Governmontshouldbouniform.

Thut the people jun,e a
separate from, or independent of, lhe go\' e}·}„ i·iglä (0 "mfo,-m gorernmetit¿ *~id, tjiei·ejbi·e, t/1(tt no gorçi·i!1!tei~f
ne,it of \'irgi , tiù, üiíghí to bc e ,·eaed ur esiab /¿.jhed u 'ithíji íh : ümiíà
í /tei ·eo /,
Section 15. Qualitics necessary to presery

ationoffree government. Thai no jree govenìmeilt, nor the b/eäsijigs
O/'/íbert.r, cün be
preserved to any people, but by a firm
adherence to justice , moderation, tempe ,·ance, . frugüliíy
, and viri,ie : by /i ·eqi , e / H / ecurre /ice io
8„ da , ne:,io
i principles ; and by tl, e recogi Ìo , i by all ci: i =e, is tl, a{ thcy have d„,
ti{ ies as well oä ,·ightà , (i,Id thüt à·i ,clî ,·iàtl: 3 c,imiot bc
save iii a society where law ís e,Vo)·ed
respected and due process ià obscn'ed .
Tllal froe go•re,•mne),ì resis, cli doas all p,·ogi·ess, t,poi, U,e bi·oadesi powíbl: d,1./„.,¿„, c,1 k„u-·t:dge, m,d ih cit Comntonweath ~jioi,ki í:,·mi
itsel. fofthofe lale }Its which }ia w ·e has sow}i so líbei 'ally O :,ioltg ilò· people by usò·i„·ì
, iš th c oppoi · i „ nity lüi · tlieir jì, 1 le,ït devc lopi,tciìí b\, im
e#ective s>'s:em of educatioti throughout the
Commonwealíh.
Section 15-A. Marriage,

That only a unto} ì bc:wecti one man
ünd one womun may be a inarriage vahd m o,· i · ecot
;}ted by this Co „, z „ o }i„'eulth aird i :à pütilit <1 {
subdivisio)13. This Commonwealth a}: its politiea
d l subdi \'ision:t Nltall not create o ,· recog„ i :e c: legill st <: tl,
sfo,· ; dcilio ,i.ç!; ip~ ol I ,it„ic„·ried
ilidividuaìs that intends to approximate the design, qltolilie
. s , sißidìcü„ce , ür e,JJecls of mm·riagü . Nor shall this Coi„, i <i, I ,*·e <ålih o
pomlcal subdivísions creat e or
,· its
recogn ize ü ,iother w i oi :, pai ·t , iei sjwp, oi oth er legal s la ti< s [ o wjìuch i s ass ¿ g„ed Mei
· 'IØ , ts. be,ieltls,
obligations, qitalities, or eífects of IM ,·,·
ìage
TI,e ame,idment ratijìed November 7, 2006, and effective
January L ] 007 -Added a iww .%' CC / fo / l ( 15 - A).
Section 16. Free exercise o f rellglon; no

establlshinento f i·elií:ioi}. 77!at ,·elig¿o,i o,· the diay w/Iic/i we owe !0 oit,· Creütüj·. md lhe
mülmer ofdiscl:ai ·gmg h, can be direcledonly by reason and comictioi
l, nüt by force or vìoleitce, and, [he ,·ejbi·e. mllne,
lo thefreeexercíse of rehgion, accordingto thedìclütesof i iíre equ(lily eniítlvd
conscience : and Oìat it is the mwìlcìldìtíy oj uíl to p3 ·acíìce
love. and darity (owürdy Chi 'istiaìì jö,·beurance.
eüch uthör . No mün sjìaíl be con ,pellüd to
f}'eque }i { or si,ppoi·1 <: ny rehgio „à „·o,·. hip . pìaci~. o,·
norshallbeenforced, restrained, molested, or mlnisci ·y . hciísoiver.
burihened in his body or goodj, Iìor slìüìt o{Ììeì·wi.
ïc äilffer on ücc·s>lin{ ol his teligtou.\ optnions
or belief bt,t all n, e,î sha IÌ be
frec to profess and by (: i ·gw,ie, It to „Håin ( ci iii Ihei ,· opinions in m ,ilie ,·s oj l 'eligio,ì.
dimi„ ish, ei, ((wge, or ajj&({ theí r civil capacitíeá. A , td the Gene,·al (:lifl IIi e a(i me .ïhall ill uu i.ie
Aásen ,bl y shall no{ pre ácl -Íbe (m \· t 'Çtigttilts
/ esf „ /ici k vt ,·. ( ir cwlki ant
pecilìai· pri,ßleges o }· üdva ,itoges o ,i ¢: t !>, sect or
ofany disfric [ wifhi,i this Cm „„ denoinitwmon, oi · puss (lll>' {(: W ,·equi ,·ing ol· azltllorl :ing filìy religi<) l( s .~cì:ty, or tlìe people
wwgalth, to lei ,y on tjtciti:dves ol· othe}·s , ain· ta.r A}i· the erect ioti
,„· i ·epair of any hozcíe Ij 'pitblic .'oi·¿~iiíp ,
°¥ for the support Of an), çhw ·chor ministry,· bui t ähül[ be lejÌ free {0
erery person (o seleci his religious insi ,·i,aor, und io make for híà
support such private contract as he shall please.
't,
Janice Wplk Gronb,dlur wouid not have gone to

Jull Illegally
ISX. ~ I f Judüo Morrlck Garland had followed tl,o Läw and not
Made it
-~----~
To protect onoh~ h~|o~~AJ~wh~
D, :t,~J¿L:.nll~ E y Gr¿:odier H o ckm'n
Who uHATMS" CATHOLICS'Mo and
My Family hod nothing to do you,
girli, booaut,o you raised thom Cathol,c
'
1,···, 6/.l„Luil:>·1(L~oi G/„n -L//„La¥1234(i,~/ ol corn·
wnritto lioar son,utlungnlorei,c arlur 1 corìtncted IlonaEIV

Froednlan Gronadier Hocktnnn yoilr w,tcli I,i„,t
l, over
l''u' l. ·Ill 1%1"L.· '·4,."
VO.... .•...... T-~h¥ ..I... .I..
YOU WERE
REJECTED. .-''..'.,
BLAMING ALL JEWS UKEHITLERFORNOTL
l,Z'.
IVINGONEASY
I I STREET
...
.'' ' .,~ll,fu. ~.
0.(* ci lw,·* vcn, G,cr-d.t¥ H c~krnan .'..'..:...0.. '..»i,i.,*..,lilli,ri, ~,~. OIl., 1.i, '
& h, MWNA
Cr ,~ G,/Id / LIZ,5. YOU ARE THE NAZI WORSE A r,1USLIN LOVING NAZI!
*Wmllak,leuvis <ØLA
i../ tè". law i. v.ry Çlear. Tlut Jläli CI/,hi aclilni hlvø tu,n4d t.aci ttpn/, Clktíaa-/.1?NLUL/,gc/í.Il-L/iA:a.l,Au¢.
Tikly *imioie U„//, T,Il/41 VS CU, IDW an/ T,„/ 18 LISCI/I 1;ltiaj' Wb,~ovo, *./Idi *i iv<u/i~, .n, /.i,-n
I.. Iia,Ili- * PEONACU, Ih.11 h~ Ii.Id .n.11*,,~i.,.I. I., 1.i,„-n..., n.~i. tku. .0 ,.ar. ,r 1,*i,i. rn,a,..
Wtebir 22, 1014 l wa• pla¢ld ,/ Fil 1., 1.,il, li ,/y
l,gi/,I/ ~ In JO /a// which 1, / v,oül,on ol M,y TM/I¥/h
A.,ndm., -Ni,hu Slov,ry n~; mvilwnt/r
y D•rvltw# u.fl,~J
u.¤nttbæfnl--hra E,clmtt.-'*•i. •' ™. P•.y-Itlall-ho.. lh,Iy G.n¥,6§~U, It]Ujj V,1., rmmn tltw url;*oo ito[,i, oi
My 8**, t, th,M Jui,s~bctli.-. IWU.r,nir, thi ilgm Dy pløüq n], -W~dir 0
it]W PCO,Woi 1 tñvoll,It,r,
S,rvltu,è, IMWW W PWM AMMNm,Mt ilohl by 1~ullcteul &;rem**
Llw t,np,iêo:,nnint 4#
"IWMi-#I U"'l. Th" Vi•1•tt,l *l my E,lht A,Mindn,IM[ R,ght *, tl &~l„l,v, Uæil wh,slî in thl.la»s
J.....*-*.....
GIn*UUIS,I. YR/Itltltlli §/1- Illch furthi, ihøwi lh, hnøwti·l,u~Ablo ntallc,w, i,kt,rr~ §9 I,I,MI m, till iII
by Jüp WAA.**I,
410*UH. Clark. il NI¥irnb,r 41)6 3014. I,ai, Ølit.»I,It,ei a,h/ RI„,bu„.I ,* ,~a™I, lin, thi Lczifi„I p,I..„*
-K,m#, hün,
Section 17. Constructlon

of the Billof Rights. 77¿L' ,·ig/Ns e,mn,ei-uied in Uus Bill
of Righ a Sh<lli not be cot,äl,·i,ect io limit
the people not therein expres ulhei· i·iglits oi
sed.
10
INTENTIONAL The cvidcnce is well documented which
often you have ìo rely on circumstantia
FRAUDLENT tho courts havc dcvclopcd "badg l evidence oí' fraud. To prove actual
cs of fraud," whkh, while not colicl intclit,
usive, are considcred by the courts
TRANSFER AND cvìdcncc offraud:[çitation as circumstaìllial
nccdcd]
REVCOVERY OF
MONEY AND Bccoming insolvcnt bcçausc
of the trans fer;
Lack or inadequacy of consideratio
REAL ESTATE n;
Family, or insider relationship among
parties;
Thc retention of possession, benef
its or use of property in question;
The existence ofth¢ threa
t oflitigation;
Thc financial situation o f the debtor
at the timc oftransfer or after tmnsfe
r;
Tho existcnoc or a cumulative effect
ofa series oftransactions after the
onset ofdebtor's financial diffiçu
The general chron ltiçs;
ology of events;
The secrccy of the transaction
in question, atid
Deviation from the usual method or course
o f busincr s.
1 Thnt thc documents meet the above

requirements of FRAUD by Divorce
lawycr Ilona Grcnädicr ct a!
CONSTRUCTIVE
FRAUDULENT That the Sale of Real Estate in thc Chapte
r 7 was donc by Fraud on the Court
by Reed Smith. That the collusion with
TRANSFER OF Orcnadier was to harm me. and leave
me and my girls financially unstable
Ilona
forced on Janice by the courts. she found willing partners in lawyer
REAL ESTATE s that were
That inefficient council / ovcrpaid counci

l can be proven that each and every lawyer
have a Property Settlement with know or shoü,d have known 1 had to
my divorce.
That Burke and Herbert, Ilona Grenadier

and others kncw the Liquidation Agreement
would not hoìd up in court as is shown
in the Bcllcfonte Property Deed when
Ilona signed as if under durcss for
signing and stating after her signat
have to sign duo to thc Liquidation ure slic diould not
Agreement.
The Liquidation agreement was signed

after Divorce Lawyer Ilona Grcnadier and
appearance hired a "Hitman" and pulled x-husband David Grenadicr had by äll
a gun In the home. That Ilona had
given David in or around June of 1997
' to move into the basement - do things the advice
for the kids, none of Janice's laundry, or
allow licr to eat what he had cooked to
the separation. The Liquidation agreem start
ent was signed in November of 1997,
whcn killing me didr.'i work.
Ilona would then in December aa a lawycr

write up a separation agreement and a
sign - I refused únd no property 3cttlcm property settlement that she wanted Inc
cnt was ever done. to
CONVERSION That Janice never legally gave up her propert

y rights. Divorce Lawyer Ilona Grenad
ícr Heckman m a pattern and practice
that startcd with Sonia Grenadier sold
property / conveyed property to her daught
er Erika Lewis illegally and behind Janice
back. 's
The Scheme to steal from Janice began

in or around December of 1986 with the
portion of down payment and lie about not having enough moncy for
closing costs. GIC
That with thc conversion of Real Estate

ín ihc Liquidation agrecmcnt - then ihc
sale of It in collusicn with Burke & Herber
Bank - using sale proceeds by all t
appearance to furthcr invest in Califo
rnia and other places'
That Divorce Lawyer did not have to
act crimina[Ìy she did so voluntarily and
with knowicdgcablc inlciìd.
COLLUSION That thc Collusion of David Mark
Orcnadier, Burke and Herbert Bank,
Weiser Esq. Judge Haddock, Judge Land Carroll Blair, DiMuro Ginsb
McGrath, Judgç Kcnìlcr, Judge Dawk erg, Michacl
ins the Prince William County Judgcs
this court have colluded and worke , Judgc Potter,
d hand in hand in the GANG RAPE
and criminal dealing of Divo of Janice Wolk Grenadier to enrich
rce Lawyer Ilona. and do the illegal
That Taylor Burke / Burke and Herbe

rt when hc was in July of l 997 was
Ilona to squash Janice to repa under investigation by dl cppea:ancc
ir his standing with the FDIC worked with
.
That the Judiciary, thc Governme

nt and Elected 0 fficials arc as
a pattern and practice selling Justic
ignoring thc United States Cons e to the highest bidder
titution, the Law and Rules of
thc Supreme Court who is Empo
wering them to do so.
MALISCIOUS That Bankruptcy Lawyers,
Judges, Ben DÍMuro, Michael
PROSECUTION, Weiscr, Ilona Grcnadier Ilcck
Collyer, Ann Schmidt, John mün, Andrea Mosley, Hillary
Tran el al all licd in court,
lied in court documents whic
OBSTRUCTION ignored It. h was pointed out to thc court
thal
OF JUSTICE
That the Judge's to date ofall
owed Fraud on the Court by
Janice to line their friends lawyers to maliciously ¢ttusc
pockets or its Judge Clark unnccess,iry paili and suffering
did for "friendship"/ of
11
Justice was Obstruçtcd when
every subpoena for informatio
n was denied Janice. ihat thc
and the collusion ofall- the more moie J:nicc exposed the "TRU
harm came to Janice. TH"
That the changing ofdockets

, the mailing back ofevidenc
e sliows a pallcrn and praçt
line the pockets of"FRIENDS" icç uí- Obbll l:ctiolì oí~ Jitsl',çe
Bankcrs, Lawyers and Judgú's. to further
October 2012 - Janice's docu,

ncnts submitted into the record,
when She \venl to check that they
to take them or thcy would throw had been filed - she is told
them out, Janice refused to take
them and then they are inüile
Kemler, Dawkins d büclc to her by Judge's
and Clark, The box about 4" thick has
been x-ruyed and shows tile documents
box but, never opened still In the
Eg.-
The most recent case for legal fees

was malicious and illegal. All legal
court. Legal fees were in Order fees awarded where "VOID" due
s and as Judge Clark stated very 10 Fr:,ud on the
clearly aíìer 11!cg:lly jai líng Janic
TORTURED in jail to his best e and having lìcr
friend Michael Weiser "1 aln su
sorry I cannot collect your legal
jail - you will have to
come Í'ees - I h:i\'e to le: het oitt of
back and get a " not different tllen "CASH
Ibr KIDS' iii Pennsylvania where Judge
jail. "CASH for LAWYERS" 's i,ent to
ìs just us illegal.
ALTER EGO That througliout the years starting

in 1993 (this was right after David
1
fur thc fi ist time stated he 3, a,i ted
would start moving thc prope
rl ies ìn ünd Oul of'Erust'S :t Jivorce) Ilona
ll:ìdcr different names She „oitl,I (Jke cci:ìri·ol ,)f
could be used. Thann doing so shc was Itowthc propcrlies
the .Iter ego ofthe trusts, This resulted
hanning thc other partners with ktlow in pei-sonl! unjusl cnriçl:iti¢nt, fraud íind
ledgeable intend
VIOLATIONS OF That Ilona's hate ofCatholics

was made clear in or around May
THE CIVIL of 2008 wlìen she stoted very clearl
nothing to do with your children y "Me and My family had
because you raised them Catholic"
Ihc hatc is proven in her collusion
RIGHTS ACT OF Miller in tlic blog jwgrenadierísala
ir,blogspot,com that is down with
u'itli Loretta Lax
a ilcw one that went up as l got
187 (42 USC § OM 0 fjail
That the rights o f Janiçc in üic
1983. 1985,1986) courts wcre denied to her for heing
"Blacked Billed" by the Old Bo>s
appearance by Judge Donald Netwotl: order by all
Kent and Judge Donald Hadd
ock.
RACKETEERING That tlie criminal enterprise of
Ihe J udici tlry to harm those that
AND CORRUPT do not Iìavc tlìc inoliey or us e ':iwye
the Judge's is sick. That the r; Oir.l i,i·e i,c t frie n ds oí
facts, the documents show
ORGANIZATIONS
ACT OF 1970 That the Judiciary, the Governmen
t and Elected omcials have wrc¿Itv
you buy me brcakfast, lunch, dinne cl a "You scrnlclì 'ny back - 1 %%'ill
( 18 USC § 1962) r a weekend getaway -I will rule scratcli your back" or
in your favor. Being the x-wi fc
Judges at eventsetal Ihavesecnthisbeliuv o f a son ofa Judge -
iorfirsthand. Ihave i,owlirec! tlicotheisídc
women who havc donc whatever at tlle merc\' ofthese tneli nlid
they can to sílence me. By tlie
gracc of God l am still alive. RIP
were not so lucky. Nailcy Dv,nning et al that
-U- -1
Deccinber / January time frame

oí 2012 & 2013 Lawyer Ilona m
a gentleman that goes by Lhe collusio:, wttlì otlìe'rs Us iì favor
name of Mark Stuart \'ho inforï or hired
ns Janice lìe w:ìs lo druíz Janic
pictures of Janice. or to rane one e aîid ízet sexual inappropriate
of Janíçc 's dailghter:ç. or to plant
Court Judges Kemler. Dawk ilru t¿s on Janic e's daitehter or ìn the hollìe tv Kivç
ins and Cl:,rk, information Circuit
to makc ,]WG incot,lpete,lt to
said thc Lawyer Ilona will go filc lìlìy otherdocwiìents. Mr.
to any length to harilì Janice Stuart
she can to distraçt Janice from or Janice's daughtei·s, l h,11
La,vyer Ilona will continue to
becoming sllccessful and movi do whüt
ng on willì Jaiìice"s life. -llìat
that all Lawyer Mona's actio L:iwycr Ilona is iz "G,·ccd)· .ïcw"
ns are deliberate to causc
harm to Janicc When tile
Informed Janice they were Alexandria Police were çülle
Instructed by Commonweol d they
th Attorney Randy Scngel
to not take any ,·cpurts o f
i,sue,
LIBAL AND That when Ilona acting in
collusion on her and her frien
SLANDER ds blog lied stating I was
trying to sell a t-alnily fricn the "ami-Clìrisl" :t %0;iìosex
di>' product "My Pillow ui!" \\'1:ìle
Pack" funhcr harmed me
with :hcir [ics
That Ilona and h¢r lawyers
lied ìn court, in court docu
ments slandering thc (ruth
and me defaming ine
FALSE Judge James Clarlc Illeg
ally Jails Plailìtiff: That
IMPRISIMENT slave, Taking someone Judge Cl:u·I:s actions turn
under Title 42 US Codc ed b:ick time. Giví,Ig me
1994 and Title 18 US Cod less ,·igllîs t heil u
person to a condition of PEO e 1581(a); Whoever hclds
NAGE, shall be fined unde orreturns any
r this titlc for imprísuncd rlot
more th:ill 20 yc.irs or both.
-I-Ijlil oil
12
Oçtober 22,2014 Janice was placed in jail for
failure to pay legal fees ín 30 days which is a
Amcndmont "Neither Stavcry not involu violation ofmy Thírteenth
ntary servitudc, except as punishment for
a crime where ofthe party shall have duly
convicted, shall exist within the United States,
or any subject to their Jurisdiction". Furthe
" under ' a slate Peonagc / Involuntary rmore the rìght by placing me
Servitude violating the Fourth Amendment
right by malicious pro5ccution, false
imprisonment and unconstitutional arrest,
This violâtion ofmy Eight Amendmcnt
cage constitutes " Rcstitution Bail
Right as to Excessive Bail which in this
" which further shows the knowle
dgeable malicious intent to 3ilcncc
over on November 4th. 2014. Biüs, mc till thc election was
Retaliation and Retribution to furthcr
tine the Lawyers pockets by Judge Clark.
That on November 12 , 2014

when Judge James Clark was forced to release
Janice eorly from joll he turned to his
BEST FRIEND lawyer Michael Weiser
and stnted very clearly " I Rm so sorry 1 have
Collect your legnl fees for vou .. YOU, to let her out of , T : iii , Ï cannot
vlll have to çome back to get a Judyment"
ñled for. to date no such Judgment has been
By all appearance it was tllrou[:h the

ORDERS of Judge Jamçs Clark -
Janice was to be tortured Ín thc City
Alexandria Jail. of
That in CASE NO, 1500-3661 ñled

by Divorce Lawyer Ilolia Grenadier
Heekm:rn for legal fees that ure nut
Judgements- Judge James Clark hus
pet·soi:illy in Judge's Chatnbers cliosen
Discovery to show the "TRU iì Trustee, not giving i'l:,intiff,ìny
TH"
TURNOVER OF That thc appearance is in 1983 from docume

ntation that Janice has Mona became Truslúe
PROPERTY SOLD Ilona is using profit9 and rents for by all appeara and is still collccl rents et al. That
nce other Real Estate or personal use / use
by Erika Lewis her daughter ct al ,
/ AND OR STILL
COLLECTING
RENTS AS
TRUSTEE
FRAUD ON THE That the evidence and thc orders themse

lves by Judge clearly show FRAUD ON
THE COURT. That the willingness of
COURT BY Judges to protect them own is clearly in thc
Orders and the acts and actions. .In c-mails
between lawyers " Do we ihat nçcidcntly 1 was included in
LAWYERS AND have to respond or will Judge Clark just take care
of il ". Lawyers do not have to respond to the
JUDGES Appeals Court or the Supreme Court of Virgini
a - Judges have agreed to further RAPE
Thc mnchincry ofthc çourt is broken JANCIE lo takc care of their own.
, corrupt an enterprise to protect their
own.
In Bulloch v. United States, 763 F.2d

1115, t 121 (toth Cir, 1985), thc court
stated "Fraud upon the court Is fraud which
directed to thcjudicial machinery itself is
and is not fraud between the parties or
fraudulent documcnts, false statements
perjury. ... It is where the court or a membe or
r iâ corrupted or influenced or influence
ís attemplcd or whcrc thc judge has not
performed his judicial function -- thus where
the impartial functions ofthe court have bcen
directly corrupted."
Honest Services The Scheme is Systemic denial of honest
services of the court system , while perpetralíng a kickback
Fraud 18 USC § with others , or financial gain . To bescen scheme to gain favor
as a game playcr with tlìc "Old Boys Network " with
and the pnymcnts towards dinners thc hope ofpay raises , bonus
1961 , parties , portraits or whatcver the Judge
may request of thc lawyers which give Lhe
appearance of bribery.
These are the Professional Code of Ethic

s that Divorce Lawyer Ilona Grenadier
Heckman has violated and been
ignored by the Virginia Statc Bar with
the help of Ethics Head James M. McC
University of Richmond) auley ( Adjunct Professor to the
Professional Code of Ethi

cs
The following and possible
others have been Violated
thru the Misconduct of Divorce
Lawyer 1! ona
Grenadier Heckman and many
others
Rule !. 2 Scopc of Representatio
n
(t) A Låwycr shall abide by a client
's decisions concerning the
objectives of representation,
clientu to the means by subject ot paragraphs (b), (c)
which tey are to bc pursu and (d), and shall consult with
ed. lhe
That in thc Schcmc of stealing
from Janice Divorce Lawyer
Ilona Gre:iadier acted a: Janie:
money that was manipulatod lawyer andi whcn as·kcd tur licr
out of Janice through lio documents anu a "NOTE" for
on or around July 6,1990
was not David Orenadícr who for money by Divorce Lawy
stole such money only leavin er's own admi,sion in May
g Divorcc Lawycr Ilona Grcnu of 2008 that it
her kw firm. dicr Hcckman zo stcal from
thc Sonia Orenadier Trusl throug
h
13
Rule 1.3 Dlliucnce
(a)A lawyer shall not with reasonable dìligcnt

and proinptness in representing a client
(b)A lowycrlhall not inzcntionally fail to carly out
a contract of employment entered into with a chent
Rule l.16 for professional serviçcs, but may withdru\v as pennitted
under·
(c)A kwycrshall not intentionally prejudice or damage
a client dur'ing thc course ofthc profcssional clulionsh
criminal Rcts (o coveruo hor and her law ip Divorçç Lawyer Iloni, hi:1·nied Jî,niçc iïì several
ftrmA atcålìnl! from the Sonia Grenad
ier Tr,ist :Icçount
Rule 1.4 Communloation - Divorce Îawver and
othçr Inwvcrs l Icd aö 4 p~ttçrn ond orticti¢c
Grenadiorthofl fromhcr liw omçchid oertinen - Dìvorçç Lawyçr Ilona bclìlnd the back of
t fhçts onlv reçently learned, TI,is fncts werc Client Janice ìn the Sçr lü
nattern and practice stole from thcm ket)t froîii Judg; Grcnadier's s stcr I<uth artd
using * forged trust agrcçmcnt her fami]Y db llona asa
(a) A lawyer shâll kccp a client reasonably

informed about the status of a matter and prompt
(b) A lawyer shall explain a matter to thc çlicnt ly comply with reasonable requests for inform
rcasonably necessary to permit the client ( o inforrned
ation
(c) A lawycrshall inform the clicnt of facts pertinen decisions regarding thc tcprcaC: ttatiott
t to the matter and of ço,nrliunicationj from another
party ütat may slänmcan.Iy a ffcct settjc,mç[Ìt
rcsolution ofthe matter. Or
Rulo l.3 Fccs
(a) A lawyer's feeä shall be reasonable,

Thc factors to bu ¢0113idcrcd tn determi
ning the reasonablcness of u fee include
1) Thc time and labor rcquired, the novelty the fo owinß
and difñçulty ofthc questions involved
, and hc skill rcquisite to perform the legal
2) Tho likelihood, if apparent to the client, service propcrly,
that thc occeptance of the particular
employment will preclude other employ
3) The fee customarily charged ment by the lawyer
in Ihc locality for similar Icgal scrviccs
4) Thc amount involved and the results
obtained:
3) The time limitations imposed by Lhc
client or by thc circumstances,
6) The naalre and length ofthc profes
sional rclationship with thc çlìcnt
7) Thc experience, reputation, and ability
ofthe lawyer or lawyers performing thc
services lind
8) Whether the fcc ìs fixed or contingent
(b) A lawyers fcc shall bc adcquütely

cxplalncd to the çlìcnt
Rule 1.6 Confidcntiallty of Information
(b) To tho extcnt a lawycr reasonably bclìcvcä necessary

thc lawycr may reveal :
(1) Such informâtion to comply with

the law or a court ordcr
(3)Such information which clearly establis
hes that the client has, in thc coursc ofrhc
rcprescrtution, perpetrated upon a third
subject matter of the repreicntation. party, a FRAUD related to thc
(c) A lawyer shall promptly reveal:

(1) The intention ofa client, as statcd by thc
clìcnt, tocommit a crime and the informat
ion necessary to prevent the crime, but
Information, the attorneyihall where feasible, before revwling such
advise the client ofthc possible legal conscqu
cncçs of the action, urge the client not
and advise the client that thc attorney to commit the crime,
must reveal the clients criminal intentio
n unless there upon abandoned, and,
client, that the attorney zhall sce to if the crime involvca PERJURY by thc
withdraw as counsel:
(2) Information which clcarly cstablizhcs
rhaz the çllcnthus, Ìn the course of the
reprcsentation pci-pctratcd ü FRAUD
representation upon rclated to the subjcct matter ofthe
a tribunal . Bcforo revealing such in formatio
n , howcvcr , the lawyer shall request that
For the purposeå of this parngraph and the client advise the tribunal of thc FRAUD
paragraph (b)(3), in formation ís clearly
hu perpetrated a FRAUD: established whcn the clicnl acknowledges
or to thc attorney that the Client
(3 ) Information concerning the misconduct
of another attorney to the upproprjarc
profcssion. al authority under RULE 8 . 3 Where
to report thc misconduct is protect the information necessary
ed under this Rule, the attorney after
consultation must ob:üjn client conscn
disclosure of uli rca3onably forese l Consultation should include full
eable çonscqucnccs of both disclos
ure and non-disclosure to thc chent.
Rulel.7 Conflictoflntercst: Oeneral Rule

- Ben DÌMuro met with and ronrcien
tcj Jnniçc Wolk (lr.t,ädicr In (hu ov¢rßiz:
íl , lclr,Med thl , to Ren D[ Muro who bv of 404 E Mvnroç Avc f-Irc. Tllat Janic¢
anocarançc bclievcs that since he
is ß oß , it President ofthe VSB and
has nurchased the Justice to hold has donated 10% ofhis çstatc at
him above Ihc law and anyon thc ti < nç ofhis dcath - llc
e he represents. Divor¢e Lnwvçr Ilona Grçnüdicr Hcçkm
should u the Judges and Layers
are willing to out theìr careers arì albo belicvç), slìc l'ì above the law and
on the lìnc to ÇOVEI< UP Ììçr
çrin'.inal acts and actions.
(a) A lawyer shall not represcnt a client

ifthe reprcsentation of that client
person, or by the lawyer's own may be materially limltcd by thc
:ntcrests, unless: lawyer' 5 rcspon s Ibil itles lo another
clic lìl or to a third
(2) The lawyer reasonably bclicvcs

(hc rcprcscntation will not be
adversejy affected; and
(3 ) Thc client conscnts aftcr consultation
. When represcnmtion o f
multiple clients in a single nlattc
Implications of the common repres ,· is undertake : ì , h e con sulrat i oll
entation and the advantages sh al ] i nc ludc exp ] anation o f the
and riskc involvod.
Rule 1.8 Conflict of Interest:

Prohibited Transactions
Rule 1.9 Conflictof Intere

st : Former Client Janiçç Wolk Orcnidicr
was a formerchentof Ben
DÌMT,ro
(©A lawyer who has forme
rly represented a client in
a matter shall not thereafter
porâon's íntcrcsts are mater represent untocher pcrson in
ially adverse to the íntercsts tlic same or u äubstantìally
of thc former client unless Icliltcd tlìit:(Cr Ill which that
both Ihe present and forme
r cl,ent consent after consu
liaz,on.
(b)A lawyer shall not know
ingly reprcscnt a person
in the same or a substantial
previously represented u ly related matter in which
client, it firm witll which thc l jwyc
r former ly wil s ässociate
had
14
Rulo 1:10 Imputcd Disqualiñcation: General Rule
Rule 1;11 Special Conflicts oflnterest for Former
and Current Government Officers and Employees
Rule 1.12 Fozmcr Judgc or Arbitrator
Rule 1.13 Organization as Client

Rule !.14 Client with lmpairment
Rulc 1.13 Safckeeplng Property
(c) All fúndzreceived or heldby alawycrorlaw

ftrm on bchulfof a client, othcr than rcimbu
rsement ofadvances for costs and expense
moro idontifioblc cãorow accounts maintained , shal; be deposited in one or
at a financial institution in the state in which
the law office is siluutcd ünd no funds belongi
ahall bc deposited therein except as follows: ng to the lawyer or Ìw firm
(d)When the course of rcpmcntation a lawyer

h in POSSESESSION OF PROPERTY
in which both the lawyer and another person
be kept separate by the låyer until there is an accounting daim int:rests, the propcrty shal]
and severance of their interests. lfa dispute arises çonccrn
åhall be keptseparate bythe lawycruntilth ing their respective interest, the portion ín díspute
e dispute is rcsolved. Divorce lawver in July
law ñrms lnvolvoment in stcalin, from thc of 1990 monioulítc(1 Jünicc into loi ninv ß]Ü,000
Sonia Orcnndlc
r Trust - whiçh Dtvorçc Lawyçr Ilona (ircnad,e , îo COVEK UP hçr and her
Di MuroOI noburz and M Ichaol Wclacr arc r refused to tärn over [o Janice. That thc Inwyçrs
in collu~inn with J udge, u) Cover t,P Ihc<e
cr ninal Rcts and a ctions.
Rule 1.16 Declining or Terminating Representation
(b) Except ås stated in paragraph (c) a lawyer

shull not reprcsent o client or where rcprescn
tation h.s:o,wa,cnccd,.hu'I w,thdrcw
client if: fro„n Ihç rcprçictitimon ora
3). Tho lawyer is dischnrgcd, - DIVORCE LAWYE

R ILONA GRENADER actíní? nç ïanice li:wycr
7 . 1990 has rr.ñlsed to turn over NOTE . in Ktc[[lint¿ $30.000. from hcr in a conversation
She stole the money [ o go into Davinu off moncv stolen on Julv
Indlrcctlv / dircçtlv shows Janiçc put morc cash throueh herlaw firm for G [ C to purrhasc proneiti¢ 9
into OIC between this and monev tükçn out ofthe Which
Bçllcfonte Partnership then x-husband David
Grcnüdier.
Rule 3.3 Candor Toward thc Tribunal
(c) A lawyer shall not knowingly :
(1) Mnkc å fal,c statcmcnt offact or law to

a tribunal;
(2) Failto disclote a factto a tribunal when dìsclosu
re is necessary to avoid assisting a criminal or
(3) Fail to disclose to thc tribunal controlling legal fraudulent act by the client, subject to Rule
uuthority ín thc subjcct jurisdiction known to the 1.6:
disclosed by opposing counsel: or lawyer to be adverse to the position ofthe client
and not
(4) Offcr cvidenco that tho lawycr knows
to bc false . lfa lawyer has offered material evidence
remodial measurca. und coincs to know of its falsity , Lhc lawyer shall
lake reasonablc
Rule 3 ,4 Fairness to Opposing Party and

Counsel
A lawyer shall not:
(1) Filo a suit, initiate criminal charges,

asscrt a position, conduct a defense, delay
a trial, or tüke other n:tioi on behalf ofthc
ia obvioua that such action would serve client whcn the lawyer knows or wlìcllij
merely to hara. or maliciously Injure
anolhcr. Il·ÏAT IS [,X ACTL«Y WHAT Ttl lô
SlnT 15 - M At. IC!()1./5 -] O M AI<IVI
Rule 4. l Truthltilncss in Statement to Others

In the courso ofreprcscnting a client a
lawyer shall not knowingly
(a) Make a false statement of fact or

law; or
(b) Fallto disclose a fact when disclos
urc is nccessnry to avoid assistin
g a CRIMINAL or FRAUDULENT
act by a client
Rule 4 . 3 Dealing with Unrepresented Person
s
Rule 4.4 Respect for Right

s of Third Person
In representing a client alawycr

shall not use means that have
no purpose olhcr than to cmbar
that violate thc Icgnl rights ofsuch rass, delay or burden a third pervon, or use method
a person. s of obtaining evidence
Rule 3,1 Responsibility
Rule 5 . 5 . Unauthorized Practice

Of Law; Mullijurisdictional Practi
ce of Law - pIVORC LAWY
E ER ILONA GRFNAD ] RR HICKMAN
USED A LAWYER NOT
LICESENDED [N VIRGÏNIA TO
STEAT REAL ESTATE - her action
s have carised manv homeowners
in the Cltv of Alexnndrín to havc
Drooçt"!je, with Jnniçc Wolk
g=dig~ingzmlün:
(c) A Icnvy•r :hall not practice law

in a Jurtsdiction in violation of the
regulation of the legal profession
(d) Foreign Lawyers: in tha: jurisdictio}i, or assist anoth
er in doing so
15
(/) "Fore/gn ifityer" Lr a penon aut/Iorized
to practice law by the duly cons,ituted ond
ai,thorí:ed goi,ernme,ttai body ofa,ty Smíe
o, Terríio,y offhe Uní'ied
Stata or the DlstrklofColumbia, or a foreign
nation, but is ileitl, gr licensed by Ihe Si,
pre, ne Court of Virginia o ,· authorized under its rules to practict law
generully in the Commonweaìth of Virginia,
nor dìsbarred or suspended from pracli
cc In uny jurisdiction.
(2) Á Foretgn Lawyer âhall not, ucept as authori
zed by these Rules or otj,e,· law·
(1) e:tabiüh an ol~ice orother Systematic and
eontimáous p,·¢sence in Virßi,lia for the pracllce
of law, wi,i:j. may occur I.,I if [he Foreign
physically prasent tn Virginia; or Lü.Iyer [s no:
(ü) hold out to the public or otherwise

represent thai the
Foreign Lawyer is admitted to prüctice tow
in Virginia .
(3) A Foreign Lawyer shall inform the cliont
and Intercsted third pa,·tìes in writing
(t) Aal the tawyer 13 not admitted
to practice law tn Virglntui
(tl) the jurisdiction(s) in which the
lawyer is licensed to practice: and
(tit) ihs Imvycr 'a o,üke address i,t
the foreign jurisdlctlon.
(4) A Fonig„ Lawy¢r may, ajlerinfonntn
g thø client as,·equired ín 3(i).Ci'iü above,
proyide /egal sen'ices ona temporary
(t) ars undcrtakcn tn aßoclatton wìth andoccasiona/basis in Virginia d,at.
a lawyer who ts adntittcd to pructic
e without límtta :ìon in Virginia or üdmltted under
Part ~ of R\1 [e ] A : 5 of this Cou ,·t und
who acttvcly pürtlcipates in the matte
r;
(it) ari tn or rea:onably related to a pending or
potential proceed{,ig before ü tribunal in Virginía or cmoih
er Jui · tsdictton, d tl,e Foreign Lawyer, or
th, For,ign Lawyu 13 asststi,ig, is author ü person
ized by law or order to appear in such
proceeding or reasonubìy expects to be
so authorized:
(iii) are In or rca:onably related lo a pending or potent
ial arbitration, mediction, or other alternati
ve dispwe resolution proceedi,lz u, Virginlü
juri:dìction.lf:h• #rvice: arise out ofor or (mother
are reasonably rck:(ed lo the Foreigij
Lawyer's practice in a jurisdiction i,ì
which the Forcign Lüw)·er {3 admitted
practici and a,I not services for which Ihe foním lo
requtres pro hac vice admission : or
(iv) are not within
paragraphs (4)(iü or (4)(üi) and arise out of or are reas
onably rclated to the representation
of u cliem by tile Foreign Lawyer ìn a
Jurisdiction in which the Foreign
Lawyer is udmmed to practice
or, subject to the foreeoi)12 limitations, are
gov~ ,-ned prì, nariìy by i„!* rna: ionaì ¿U .,
(3) A foreìgn legal consuìtant practìcing under
Ru[, 1 A:7 of this Court and a co,·porat« counsel
registrant practicing u,ider Part U of Ri,Íe
are not authorized to practice under 1 A :3 oj iluî Cour{
this rule,
Rule 5.6 Restrictions On Right To Practi

ce
A lawyer shall not participate ìn olíertng
or maku~g:
a partngnhlp or •mployment
agreemen{ {ha{ restricts
{he righ{ of a lowye,· to prc:cli
ce ajìer lernn),atío,iof t]Îe
relationsh,p,
bc:Mfßu upon retlrement: or except un agi-cement
conccr,ing
, • (b) an agr,em•nt in which a res:ric:ion

on the {awyer'ã rixht to practice is part
of th, settlemcnt of a con{,·oversy, excep{
where such u res:riction is üpprove(1
a tribunal or a Rover
nmental entity. by
Rule 6 . 3 Member, hip In Legal Servlces

Organization
A lawyer may sirve w a director , omc
er or member ofa kgal
services organization,
apart ÍÌ·om tlie law jìm m which the lawyer practices. i, otwit
orgonizatton :ervei p•rãon; havlng in:erosts hstündíng thüi the
adverse to a client of the luwyer,
The lawyer shaìl not knowingly partielpoie
in o docision or ac , io„ oft ),e organization .
, (a) ifparticlpatlns tn th• deci:ionor gctlon would
be Incompatible wtlh the lawyer 's obliga
tions to a client imder Rule i . 7 . or
(b) whgn thed•clslon or actlon could have
a ntaterlaladverseefec{ on
the representation of û client
of { hø orsnnieotion wl, o:o i„ rest: are adv•,·s ,r io a cli• nr
ofth• lawy". t.
Rule 6.4 Law Reform Activities

Affecting Client Inter
ests
ABÁ Model Rule not cdopkd.
Rule 6.5
Nonprofit And Court- Anne
xed Llmlted Legal Serv
ices Programs
• (a) A lawyer who, under ihe
auspices ofo program spons
ored by a nonprojit o,·gu,
jiz~tion or court, provides
expectotlon by óhor{-term ítinucd Ìegat áen,I
etther the lawyer or the clien ces to c client withow
t that the lawyer will provi
de conlt,luí }12
representation m Ole mca tte }·:
O (1) lãmbject to Rutc, l.7 and l. 9(a) onlylffh
e
lawyer knows thal [ he representation of
the client involves ü confl
O O) i: subjoot to Rulo 1.} ict ofinterest : o}td
0 o„ly ìf th• lawyer k,ww
a that unotlìcr lawy
er ussociaíed with ihe lawy
er ìn a lawjìrm is disqu
to the matter. olijled by Rule l . 7 or l
. 9(a) with respect
• (b) Except as provldedlnparagrapk

(a)(2), Rx{Ie l. 10 is
inapplicable to a rel,r
esentatiün Rov
erned by this Rttle.
Ruleå 7.l · 7.6 " Infor

mation About Legal
Servlces
Rule 7. 1 Communicati
ons Concerning A Law
yer ' s Services
• (a) A lawyer :hallnot make a.
talse or mislead
ing comnlun ication about tl,
e lawyer or tke lawyer 's services
. A cummwicatio„ is
false or misleading : fit
16
contalns a matcrialmtsrepresentatton ofjàcto
i' law, or ümits a jàct whe, t omission of snch
,/t: ct makes the statement malerì„
Ily jülse or misleading aä n wholc .
7, • (b) Á communication vtolaies {his rule if

it advertises öpecifìcorcunmlatlve cüse
resuits, wìthout a disclüil,icrtilat (i) pwä
tjìe cak,·eàultã i„c, contexl thüt is
not misleading; (ti) :tates that case results depend
upon a variety offactors Miqwe lo each case,
and (iìi) furtller sta:es that case results do not
pr«itc: a :imtlai result in any.future case undertak guara,rtee or
en by the lawyer. Th, disclaimer sjid I preccdc t}ïc
coinmunication of the case remlts. When thc
communication l: In writing, the dì:clalmer shall
be in bold type foce and ztppercose lettcrs ì,i a
fo,it size t}iat is at Ìeasl as Ìargc us O,e Ìargest
text used to
adve,tise th, :pecvlc or cumulative case results
and in the same color end cgaìns: t]:e same colored
background as the text used to Jdveî·!iâe the äpecijic
or
cumulatiw case rcults.
• (c) Any abentstng pursuant to this Rule shalt

include the name and ogce üddres s of at least one lowyer responsible for its conten
t: or, üi the
alternative, a law
jlrm mayjll, with thl Vlrginta Slate Bar u çurw.i
wrlií.I 3:atem-it, id:it:1*i„8 ihc lawyer rvbpo„öl{
JIC Jür lt~e luw Jlrzri å advertising clnd íts oljìce
iaw jtrm ihall promptty üpdaie thc wrttten nddreçs. 1 he
statementif theye is any cliünge ìn status.
0 (d) A lawwrsha!!timely respond {o and
füìly coope,o:e wilh anvreo.Iá·t: for i.foria
tìon by Ethicà Coi,r,Jcl rcxurdinK the tuwycr '3 udveri.s[}ix
Rule 7.3 Direct Contact With Potential Clients
• (a) Alawyer shall not solicit employment

from apotentiûlclient if
(1) thi pot,ntial cll,nt has made known
to the kãwyer a desire not to be solicit
ed by the lawyer; oi·
(2) the aotkltation involves harassment, undue
inltuence, coercion, duress, colnpulsion, i,ztìmida
mon, threats or Mwürr:inied promises ofbenej
ità.
• (b) Alawyer shall not glw any:hing of
value to aperson for recommending the
lmvyer's serýicc: cxcept that a lawyer
• may:
(1) pay the rcaâonablc coâ#of adverd
sements or communicatto,ispermi:te
d by Lhis Rule and Rule 7.I:
OÌ Pay the usual charges ofa legal serøice plai, or a not-for=projìt
quülijìed luwyer refe rül servke;
(3) payfor a lawpracticø In accor
dance with Rule I,17, and
(4) give nominal guì: OJgratltudø that are
neither ti~:ended nor reasoi:ably expecte
d to be a Jorm of compensatlon for re co,nine
i id i,ig o lawyer's sen,lces,
• (c) Evvy writlen, recorded or electronlc
communlcation fromalawyer solicití,tg
p,·ofessionalemploymeni fromc: poiei:(i
ü{ client known to be in }ìeedojlegal
sorøtcw in o particular matter shall conspi
cuously display the words "ADVERTÎSIN
C} MATERIAL" on the outside envelo
ending cfany recorded or electronic pe. if ci}~y. and üt tile beginning and
colnmunication, unless the recipiunt
of tl, i co,M ,„„nìcaiíun
(1) t, o lowy.r; or
, (2) hasa famtllal, personal. or priorp
rofessio,îalrelutionship with the law>,er; or
(3) ts one who has had prior contact with
the lawyer.
Rule 7.4 Communication Of Fields Of Practi

ce And Certification
Lawyers moy state, announc¢ or hold
(hemsel ves out us lüntting their practic
e í,t a particular area or Jield of law
so long as the commw,ticatìol, of sucji
practice t: in accordancewiththe standa Nmilation of
rds ofthis Rule, Rule 7.l and Rule 7.3,
as app oprlale, A lawyer shall ìto: state
or ccri~ed g; a speclallstln a Qr mzply that tlle lawyer hus beeil recogn
particular field of kiw except ized
us follows:
(a) A lawyer admitted to engage in patent
practice before the United States Pa{ent
üid Trademark Omce may use the design
ztmllar designation; ation "Patent Attorney" or ci substantìíllìÿ
(b) A lawyer engaged tn Ádmlralty

practlce may use as a destgnatio,1
"Admlrally, " "Proctor in Ädtniralty"
o}· a yubstantiûlly similar deâigliülion,
(c) A lawyer who has been ceri[Jled by the Sup}·em
e Court of Virgi,Ua as u specialisi i,i some capacil
modlmof ô, a substan y may use the de:igiìal¿o„ uf bei,1* ïo cer i,Jìed.
tially :imìlar 6|.sìgna e.* . "cer,UÌ.d
:Ìon;
(d) A lawyer may communica{6 thejac
t that the lawyer has been certißed
as u spectaíis{ in a Jield of law by a
cloarly stat,a that there k no proce „ümcd organization. provided that
dure In the Com:nonweatlh the communication
of Yirginia for approving ceríif
ying orgcmizations.
Rule 7.6 Political Contributions

to Obtain legal Engagements or
Appolntmentß by Judges
Rules 8.1 - 8.5 - Maintaining

the Integrity o f the Profession
Rule 8.1 Bar Adml,ãlon And

Dl,clpllnary Matters
An applicantJor admission to thø
bar, or a lawyer already
admitted (o Lhe bar,
in connection with a bar udmissíon
o condttion ofmatntoining or appi icalion, any certification requi
rønmving a license to prac red to be fììed üs
tice law, or b, connection with
a disciplinary matter, shall
• (a) koiowingly make aJblsø nol:
statement
of matcrtcl Jàct ;
• (b),Íail todtsclos, a fact nece,sary to co
rrect a inliapprehension know
0 n by theperson lo have arise
(c), ß:ilto ~:pond n in the ma: zer:
åo a iaw,Íul demand for injbrmatio, i fro
}n an admís jiunä or aitc
information otherwise prot dtsci pllììclry hor i{~,, except tha [ !jlls Rttle does
ected by Rule l · 6: or itoi reqwre dìsclosure of
17
• (d) obâtruct a tawf~d tnvest
ìgatton by an admissions
or disciplinary authority.
Rule 8.2 Judlclål Officials
A lawyer:hallnotmake a statem
ent thal the lawyer know
s to be faìseor withreckle
ss disregardas to itslmth
Judgc or other Judlclal omcer. or falsìty co ,acci·ni,ìg the
Forallkwvers - Ilona Orena qualifìcalio,is or mlegrtlv
dicr Hcckmnn. Ben DEMuro . Miçlin of tl
cl Wcisçr . Judtc John Trail . kti
]! itrv Ccillver Andrea Moslev
Statementi have boon o untt¢rn and uraçtlçc False
in thc Citv of Alexandria Court docume
nts. in çourt nnll to the Suoremc Court
of Virfjnln
Rwlo 8.3 Reporting Misconduc

t
I (a) A lawyer havìnf reliable inform
ation that anothor law>,er l.as
ço..i„~ítled a violalion of ihc Rulü
of Professional Condwct that raises
as to that lawyer': honesty, zrustw a subòiwitial question
orthincss or jìtness to praclice
law shü[! injt~rm the appropriate
• (b) A lawyer having reliable il®rm p)·ofcšsiona I a„fh<,rity.
otion that u judge hos commi:ted
a viola{Ío,i of applicable rules
the Judge 's jitneä:Jor ofjtidicial conduct {hüt raises
u sr,b:,a,itíu] qtie,líol~ aS to
omce shall inform the approprtate authority.
Ifa lawyer ãørvtng a, a third party
neuzrat receives reliable Difon
nation di,ring {he dispute resol„
misconductwhtch ihg lawyer would Iion proccsl Ihat
a„o{/t¢i· lawyer hüs e,tgüged ín
otherwise be required to repor
i but for its co,Øden tial nature,
agrfi,nent to watve conjìdenliality the Ìawyer shall altempt to obtain
the par! i es' w í ítei~
alld permit disclositre of s,(cli
i,iforntatioli to the üppropl·iaie
professio,z<LÌ authurity
• (d) This Rul, doe: notrequire disclo
sure oft,tformation otìitrwlse protec
ted by Rule 1.6 or i,iforìnatio„ gaine
approwd lawyer's assistance progr il by ü lawyer orjudge who is a
am, or who is a trained interv member ojon
enor or vohmteer jor such a progr
particular assistance elIort, when am or comm itiee. or who üî oil,cnvtse coope
such i,tformallon is obtained ,·uti,tí; m u
for the purposes offuljìlli,tg
. (e) A lawyer shall biform ihe recognized objectives of
the Virginla State Bur if the prožr am
o (1) the lawyer has been dijcip
lined by a state orfederal
disc ipìinary awhority, agency or
cm„·t in any statg, U.S. territo,·y,
violation ofrute: ofpmfessioncl or the Di,{ric{ of Columbia,for a
conduct in thai Jurisdiction,
0 (2) thi iawyir haibun convicted
ofafelony ina state, U.S. territ
ory, District of Columbìa, or feder
O (3) the lawyerhas been convicted al court .
of olther a crlnle tnvolving thejì,
fraud, emrtion, briberyorperjur
y, oranattempt. solicitationorcon
of theJor.gotng olrøns,s, in a state. U. S. territor Distrì spiracy tocommitany
y, ct of Columbia, or fe lerul cozirt.
writingto th• Cl•rkof {he Dtâc Tlie reporting eqt, il·ed by pül-ag ,·aplì
ipitnary Syste}n of the Virginia fe) of this Rule shali be made ìn
Stale Bar not iater {han 60 duys
fo[Iowing entry ofany Jìnal order
dtscipltne. or Jltdgl,ient of convictzon ur
Rul• 8.4-Misconduct-That the
lawvers with the Judiej have had
oogo,Irti stde "Write up who ex-oarre çommuniçatlons to work
t ever vou want and I will In concert In court, ìn all Orders
oš Judf e Jomeb Clark rells the
slil lt"
It ü profes:tonal miscondu
ct for a lawyer to:
0 (a) viota~6 or uttempt to violate the
Rule: of Projessional Conduct,
knowingl>, assist or i,iduco anotl,
• (b) commìt a crlminalordelìbera:i cr to do so, or do so t],ro„äh the
ly wrongfulact thut re.ßectv adver ac:s of unod,çr,
se]), on lhe lawyer'ä honesty, trustw
~ (c) *nâag, tn çonduct involvingd orthiness orfitness to practice
isho,iesty, fraud, deceit or mlsre law,
presentalion which rejlects udver
• (d) state or impty an ability to sely on the law)'er's fit,leýs to pract
injluenc¢ impropwrly or upon ice law,
irrelevant groundã any Iribti,
• (e) knowingly a:si:t a iudR•or ial, legisìunve body, or publi
judicial omc•r in condwcí c oljìcì,i, or
that isa violütion of upplicat,le
t·ui¢s of i„dicial condKI ot·
othei· tu„·,
18
(i) File a suit, initiate criminal
charges. assert a position, cond
uct a defense, delay a trial, or
other action on behalfofthc clien take
t when tile lawyer knows or when
jt is obvious that mich action
would serve mcrcly to harass or
maliciously injure another. THAT [S EXACTLY WHAT
SUIT ÏS -MALICIOUS TO HAR THIS
M JANICE AND HER GIRLS.
Rule 4.1 Truthfulness in Stat

ement to Others
lil thc course of representing
a client a lawyer sliaíl not know
ingly
(a) Make a false statement of fact

or law. or
(b) Fail to disclose a fact when discl
osure is necessary to avoid assis
ting a CRIMINAL or
FRAUDU LENT act by a client
Rule 4.3 Dealing with

Unrepresented Persons
Rule 4.4 Respect for Righ

ts of Third Person
In rept'esenling a clien[ a lawy

er slìall not use means that have
rio purpose other than to einb
delay or burden a third pei'son. anass.
or usc methods ofobtaining evide
such a person. nce tlial violutc the legal righ,s
of
Rule 5. 1 Responsibility
Rule 5.5 - Unauthorized Prac

tice Of Law; Multijurisdiction
al Practice of Law - DIVORC
E
LAWYER ILONA GRENAD
IER HICKMAN USED A LAW
YER NOT LICESENDED IN
VLRGINIA TO STEAL REA

L ESTATE -her actions have
caused many homeowtîcrs in
the City of
A[cxandríu to have propcrtic
g with Janice Wo[!c Greiladie
r havinv ownership:
(çì A krwyer shall not prc,etiee h , w iii

f, jttri,Ydictio, i i ,t rk, lulio, I of t /îe tegtck
profession iii that jurisdic ,tiojl i ,f / he legal
tion, or assist onother iii d„
mg so.
(d) Foreig„ La,n·ers:
( 1 ) "Foreign La, ~7 'er " is a

person a :, ího,·ized to pructjce li, w b\· the d, il\' Col
,sl ilìllell litìtl
aìtthori:ed goverumemal body
Of a„y Sfc,le or l'erjiton, <,j
the I li,ited Sícíles or íhe 1)istr
ic·1 c,1
Cuhi ,nhici, c) 1 ' u jì}rejx }, j ,ütion, hm
ix ncjthei · j }ce ; i.çe£1 hy die Stq > j 'ejne ('c , Iji 'f cit Vit ·gima or
authorized imder its ,·t ,les to
proctice low geije ,vi /iy iii the Con „„ onwecilth of Ì 'i,·gi
disbati-ed or Stispei,ded fron „ ia, nor
t pructicc iii anyjziriädiclioit
.
(3) A Foreign Lc,Hl'e,· shc,// m,t,
except ux outhorix,d hi, thc.çe R„/c.
, or other /cnt'.
( ì ) estahlish c, 11 ü# ice or other Ñys
,e ,Iìatic a , jd cü „ ti ,li ,<,i
, F j,i -c.çence il , 1·'irgilìio foì · the
Qf law, si ·hich j'](jy ücem' /,t·acr ice
eve„ ifthe Foreign Lau ]·e,- i., 1101 physiculty pre
sem m t 'i,·gima: or
(ìi) hold oi,1 tu the pi,blìc or othei
'wise represem jhat fhe Foreign
Lu n.i·c, ij admitted to
pracfice law in Virginia.
(3) A Foreign Lenn er.dk
/// in./oi·m the diem and Ìi}ierestc
„ot adn, m d tl,il'il pul'tieJ i,1 \,vlti,i:
(i) tjlal the / a Hyer is ed ío p,·uc,
iee law in
l 'irginiu :
(ü) thejurisdìctioi ,(s) iii
which the lawye is licejtse~l tc)
r pri,ctice: c„,Lj
(i i i) the /mjycr'.s
office addl·ess iii theforeignjî
trisdic[
Ìo,t.
(4) A Fo,·eig, i l.cnr\,e,· inay, afte
r ij ®rming the client cix retp
, i ,·ud m 3( i )-( iii) c , hore . prt
, vide
legal services oil c, feinpoi'
ary and occasional basis
Ìn Virgjjìict flìat:
(i) are underlükei ,
iii asso ciation
with a /mú ·cr w/m is admiued to prt ,
iIi Viigi)}ici t)r aclinitted cíice without limitatio
mkle,· Pari J Of Rule I A:5 n
(,f tl,ìs ('f~ttrt a,id wh,) ac/i,·e
/v
iii the matter: püllìcipates
(il) c,re i , 1 oi · J ·eusoiably
related io a Vejklj ),g (,r pot
ei / jctl proceeding be/W ·e
Virgmla or ai,other jurisdic i, / ribimal iii
tion, ifthe Foreig,t Lawyer, t,j ci per
son Ihe Foreign Lawyer
a~ì,Älììl,g, Ìs üuthorized hy law or ord is
er to uppear Ììì nieìi ì)1'(iceediìig ür rea
sonably err,ects to
15
1
he so c„,/110,·i~ed:
( illj are m or reaäona
hly related m
c< pe, tclmg or í )(,te „ tiul c, rbici 'utio ,
t, mcdiuíkm, ur uíher
(Ilíer,ìative disptile 1~esolilliojl pl~oceeclilig m Ì· ij:gitìia ur ami{Iìe
r jìtrìstlìc{Ìüiì, ìfllie seryìces
cit ·ise oåa o,ful · cu ·e ,·e~Iso , ic, h/y re /t~ted /o ( he
Ful ·elgli Luìu ·ci ' 's prLIC [ íce itì u jîll - i : litcíloji jli
which the Foreigj, La,n·er lä admitted m prc,c
-flee a, id arc not äcr\'icc.î for wlïicli thefc)1 !, tti
requires pro hoc vice
adlilj.Fsi<),1: <,r
(lv) ure not withit, purctgraphs (4)(ü) or (4)(¿il)
uj,d a,·ise out ofor ai·e i'cusu,tc,bly,·e/ated to
the represeiìtalio„ ojcl cliejií by ihe 1·'t,reigii
[.(nn'er iii ci jiíi'ìsdìclì{,)ì ìij wliìcli lhe Foreign
Lo,n,e,· is admitled
to practice or, xitbiect to the fc,iegoiIìg lim ìtaí i (mx. are gcìvenied prìmorìl
y
hy ime,i,ational law.
(5) Aforeìgiì legcìl cotisi<1(ul,c j)Ì'({cticilìg wider

Rl,le 1,4:7 ol thiä Colíj'I Ltjltl a col'porule
colt},Sel regisírum practicing under Part H uj Rule JA , 5 ( j this ('(, Iirt we mit üllthür , Zed ,(j
practice midcr tltif ndc.
Rule 5.6 Restrictions Ôn Riglit To Practice

A knn, er shall m,t participate in offering or ma
king:
• (a) a partnership or eniplo,·ment
agreement tliut resli-Ìc ! 1 ttìe rigjìl O) ü ju \,Ter lo prueliee
cdler terminutiou oj'ij,e j·elüíionship, except <In üg,·eemetic coitcei'mng betie./ìfi Livu/1
retiremem; o,·
• (h) an agreement Iii which a rest
riction o, i the lawyer's 1·ight to
practice is part ofthe
seífiei,e„í ofa controversy, exceiw H·hei·e such a restric
tion is approved by a Irihu„al
govermnenkd emiív.
Rule 6.3 Membership In Legal Scrvìc¢s Organ

ization
A lawrer inar sen,e as a director, oßìcer
or memher ofa legi-d services orgcitizatitjiì.
c,j~arlfrnm
the law firm iii wJ, ich the lc, wye
.,· p,·c,ctices, i ,o , withstm ,di, tg 1 /tcit
the orgu , ti=utiui, se,-,·e
1
.S perso , is
hcn'1,14 intel'esls adrerse to cl cliellt <,f ihe knn ,e}·. The
la ,f -·e ,· shc, ll Imr km, H ·i,Igly pct ,·ticipcìte i , i c,
decision or actíon of the orea,
ìi=afiojr.
. (a) ifparticipating Ìn the
decision ür aclj,)„ wo,ild be i„c<inivatihle with jhe h7,4,·e/-'s
obligallo,13 lo u ctìeiìl itìider Kitle !.7; ür
• (b) where tlie decisioi Or uelic))1

Cül,W Iltn'U a })lcílerial t/th'e'/'se
effec! (m t he j'eprese,}tatioi,
of a c/ie,1/ of t/,e o,gm,iza/ií,„
„ ho.ve j„,e.,·e.ç/s óu-e adì ·ei'sc /o
a.-/ic,i, uj the /oi,u.r:
Rule 6.4 Law Reform Activities Affecting Client

Interests
AHA Model R„ Ìenût adopted.
Rulc 6.5
Nonprofit And Court-Anncxcd Limi
ted Legal Services Programs
~
• (a) A Iciwyer who, itt }der tile a,{
spices ofa program spojtsoi 'ed by a jtoi ,l),·Ojit
orglljlizcitiu,i
or court, provides short-term limite
d legal sei·,·Ìces t<) a ctjenf wit/ì<)
1{l exl)ec?ation hy either j
tile lavo 'er or Ihe clie , tt tliaí the
law\·er will provide coitì , mi „g repi ·ese ,iraíiíji , m the mut ,er :
o (/) is á'„4/ec'/ /u R:,/es l. 7 a//d 1. 9(f,J
u,dv if//)1, /ato'u/' Á-/,o :i'ç /hc,/ /he rep¿
ext,i,/atio,i qf the
cliem involves a co,iflict Uf i„terest: w,il ~
o (2) is si,hjcci to Rltle J. JO only if 'he lot„ù·e

r knows thüí ui jother Ia„yer (issc>cialed
wilh the
icn,)'er in a law fìi·,n is disqtialljì
cd h\· Rt,le h7 (,j· l .9(a) with respe
ct m the mattcr.
• (h) Excep f as providedi,i paragrap
h (a,(2), Rule 1. lo is i„upplicub
te lo a represejttc,tion
governed br this Rul
e.
Rules 7.l - 7.6 -Information Abo

ut Legal Services
Rule 7. l Communications Con

cerning A Lüwycr's Services
16
• (a) A lawver shall i ,o , make a,
thlse or misleading commtmic
atio, 1 Gboî { 1 íl?e lawyer or tile
/miye,- 's.wn'ices·. A comm , m ica
fio}ì ix fi,jäe Or mislec:c/it
lg ¿f¿t cc,ttíaitls U mate
inisi'el„'esenmticm ofjcict rial
or knv, or omifs a fact wile
n oinìssic)11 (,j suclì Jöu
meikes the
statenienl mate,·ially false
or misleodì,ìq ús a whole.
• (b) A comn,it,jiccitio,t violates

this rule ifìí adrejlises specìtìc or
ci,1,11,1uíivu case
withoïtt a disclaimer mat (i) pitts resjj//s,
the c·use I·esu/rs in a context thc,t
ix uo, mislcc,di,ig: (ii)
sfates Iha, case results depejid
îipoi a variety offactors lt,iìq
tie to each case: and (iíi)
fl,rlhel' slales Ihal cctse j·eslills
do nol gitat·ci,Iee or j),'edict a
sìl}lliar resl,ll ìjl alt\' fìlliire
cü.se i,}iderlaketl by the
Ìc{\$'ycr. Ihe dìsclúiímer
shelli precede thi, cüli,mit
}jifütìotì oj tlie Cüsç
\ resi,It.. Wilen the com, mmiccition is
m wrìting, íjie djscluìj ,ier shall he
ill bold typeläce a , id
IiI,percase letters ij) afo,w size
thal is al least as large as die
1(irgesl text Hsed to advertise
{he specific or citniutctlíve ccise
i ·esti /(s aid m the same color
wìd cígc, it ,st í he same colored
backgroimcl cis the text used to advertise tlie specifìc or ct,iîit,1(,li\'e
C¿/,Ye i es//l/S.
• fc) A,îy adrertisi,ìg pìtr:stlulìí lo this Rule
shall include îhe „ame a}ld {djice addre
least one
ss ofa[
/aH)'er respo,tsihlefor its content: or, in the alter
native, a law.fì,·t,1 ti,ay,lìle þi·ith
lhe VÌI'gi,ija Sfate Baj· a etin·e
m w,-inen slct,emejjt idejifjfÿijjg
the lawyer )'espons}ble,for me
Icn,·jìj ·m 's adrei·tisi, ig aild
it.s ojjìce addws ? he law. tìrm shctll
promptly uj , clute the writte „
smîemem if there is aiìy change
ilt sfciítís.
• (d) A lawyer shall timel>, respo
,id lo and ñclly cuopeicite \vì{Iì
a,ìy reqìtests fc,r itifot'Inatio,t
by E/llk·s ('c),I,/sel ,·egaj'L/i
/,g the /avye,· 's L/t/rer/isi//g.
Rule 7.3 Direct Contact With

Potential Clients
• (o) A law\·e,· shall m), solicit
en,vloy,nen, from a potential
client if:
(1) the potential clieitt has made
kiìown ío the ILM'ei' ct desire not
(2) ( he solicitatioti i , n,olves hci to he solicited by fhe lawyer; or
,·ass , nej , t,
it , tclite i , ifïtíel ,ce: cüet 'cic ), i, dt{ 1 'ess,
ilitimidation, thi ·eats oi' imß,a comptilsic ,íi,
i ·1 ·cmtcd promis
es Of benetìt.X .
• (b) A /mú·'er sha// not give auw
hing of'ì'a/ue m a pe,·sou,fb
r recomme,idi„g /he /aM-1'e/·'.Ç
services except that a
lawyer may:
• ( 1 ) pay lhe rei,so , johfe C <J .Çf.Ç ( ìf ad\'ei ·/ isemer
us or
cüm, m „,icafic ij j.ï pei 'jnme
a,ìd Ritle 7. J, d hy this Ride
(J) pay the itst,al cha,·ges o,f

a /egol ser;*ice t,lc,n o,· C, trot-
/(,t-proßt qtfullfìed lawyer refei
service: 'ral
(3) pay for c, Icnrpructice

Iii uccorda, ìce wim Rule 1 . 17 ; ctt
,d
(4) gire nominal gifts (,fg,Yitifz
ide that are ueithci· i~itejklec
l nor rec,si,Iiü),ly
of compeltsatkm .for ieco expected /o be <Î form
mme,Ìding a /mrver's servic
es.
* (C) Erwy wl'jffei, reco
,·<jed o,· e/eetm,Iic
co„i,mi„ict<íio,I fi'ol
îl a lawyer s<)/iciti#}
j)1'(,lessìo,ial en,1)/o\:m g
eijt f)'cim a potemi¿,1 ctie,i
t kn<,wi jo be i„ I,ced
(,J legal Nen·ices i,t cl
pc,rticitiar matter ähall conspicitoi,sl
y display the words "ADÌ'F.R
TISIN(; WATERIAI." on
the outside em,elope. ifai ,y,
and ca the heginni„ and endi
g ng qfany recorded or electro
Co, ilmimi ,ik
culion, Nnless Nie
recipiem of die com
nu ,# Iiccition :
• (J ) is a /awwr: or
(2) has afamilial, person
al o,· p,·jor pi·ofessio„c,l,·e
lationship with the /awi'
(3) is one who has ha¿ e,v or
l prior contact wìth lhe
lawyer.
Rule 7.4 Communication Of Fields Of

Practice And Certification
I.awvers mcn , state, am mce
,o , cir hold themselves out
as linîitil ,g their plcictic
area or,field of law so e m a l>orlic, ilar
lo„g as tjîe cojlìjîi~i jjica
tìo„ i,f such li mitatioiì
with the stctjidczrds of this ofp ractice is inaccordance
Rifle: Riíle 7. 1 Ct,I<I Rille
7. 3, as appropriate. A Icnn
Imply that the lc, ~)·et· has hec , i reco ,cl· shc, ll „ot staíe or
gnjzecl or ce ,· ied ax a spec
tl/ iali,rt in a l 'ctrticttkw, tield
except asfollowx: of Ictw
(a ) A /a \ g , er adm
itted to engage i ! 1 pctíeiìl
practice hef ol
' 'e the United States
Puíem and
17
l 'iädeinark Om
ce may „se ilie desižj ,uljoti "Pa/elil AI,<,r, iey " or a sz,hstci,itially similar
desigilcit joi 1:
(b) A lawyer engaged in Adi,iìralíy prttct
ice muy tise as a designc,tlc "Adm#
)11 all," "Proc,or m
Admìrally" or a suhsía,itially similar defign
ütìo,I:
(e) A lawyer who has beejl certified by the Sitpreme Court of Vi, git, iti
as a 4}eçluilsí i„ some
capacity may use //w desig„uljolt ' j being xo certijied, e. g.,
"c·e ,·titied medic,toi ·" c, r a ,¿:, h. iui,tic,lh·
,similar desig„atio,i,
(dì A la\,yer may commimicafc lhefaeí that
the lawye,· Itos hecn cer ijìed as c, :pecicdìsl ì„
a,/ìeld
of law by a named orga, iì=ation, p rorided that
I he co„1 immica: ic „, clearly s{< tles t),(,í there Ìs Ito
procedure i,i the ('(,mm
c„iwcalth of Vil'gij,ÌLI
jì)1' l~ppl·<,ri,lg lei-1 ißing
ol'gctili=atitmä,
Rulc 7.6 Political Contributions to Obtai

n Legal Engagements or Appojiittnentg
by Judges
Rules 8. I - 8.5 -Maintaining thc Integ

rityofthe Profession
Rule 8.1 Bar Admission And Disciplinary

Matters
Ail appticati, i)1' admis
~/ sion to the l,ai·, oi· ü tcnn·ei·
ah·ecujy admmcd ,(, Nìe hw·. m comieccir)11 H·i/h
a bar adinlssiüji applica
tion, tmy certijìcaíion requij·ed lo be /ìled as u comlit
ioìt Oj iìiui„ Wi,! i, ìg
or rcnewi„g a license to pructìce law,
or ìn comæc,io„ with a discipli),aly
„iulldr, shelli „ot:
• (a) ki,owj]Ìgly make ajälse statement ofnîa
terialfäct:
• ( b) fail to disclose a fact necess
ary m correcl a misappl 'eliensjo„ know„
hy 11}e pei:soji lo
have arisen m the numer;
• (c) jdil to respo,id tü a knrl
t , l demand JÌ,r i,11(,i 'j ,Ìútt jo i
*Oln (1 j , udmis.ç it), Is or disc
ai , thoriry, excel ,t that this Rtile iplijia,3'
dnex i,ot disclosure (,f j,®,·m
require atioi, o,hc,7,·ise
protec f ed hy Rîtle !,6: or
• (d) obsct'itcl a laiffi,l i,1\'e>ujgutjo,1 by c,i,
admissions ur clisciplj,iuj >· ui,thurjty.
Rulc 8.2 Judicial Officials
A knn'er shall m,t muke a statem

em that lhe lawyer k,jowx m be
false or with reckless disregard
as to its h'î, tl, orfalsify
coi ,ce,·ni ,Ig the qi ,alif,cc,ti<)„x ,),· in
, eg ,· io· (,f
ctj , ídge (, f' (,tl,er judicial
omcer. For 111 law¥ers - Ilotigi Gren
adier Heekman, Bcit Di:Vli,ro,
Michael Weiser, Judge
John Trnn . Hillnry Collyer.
Andre:, Moslev F:ilse Statemei,t
s h:ive been .i nattern and
nrnctice in the Citv of Alexandria
Court doci,me,Its. in court n,id
to the Supreme Cuurt of
Xi[Xkllil
Rule 8.3 Rcportmg Misconduct

lhe Rules
• MA law\'oer f Pha,·i,
rojess
igio
i·elia
„al hle i,ifot'tlîatíotl that ajìotlîel' lawyer
Cojìd ïic'I íhal ra has committed a viotatioj, of
ises a stil
,sta,itiul q
tieslioi as
I,o}ie. (y, n'tistworthi}~es
ío tl,ut /aiú·c,·'s
s „r lìt}ìess to prctctìce
law shal! i,ìjì,rm the appr
oprìuíe prc}jèsxìonal
C,lttl,orin'.
• (b) A kmyer having reliul}Ie i,®rm

ution tlìut u jitdge hu.s cujiì,),Ìlíe
d u rìolütion (d
applicable rules oj judiciul
conduct thut raises u si,bstujlt
iol qiíestioil as Io tlìe judge's
lìti,essjür (,ßice shal
l inform the cipl),Y)!)1·iate a,ttl,
f,rify.
' (C) If a lawver sen,i,tg as a third party neu
tral /CC'eij'e,f ieliul
,le iufoimatic),i dlílijìg tile
dìsptite l 'esolwit)„ process
íhuí a,ìoíher /a ), i 'el' has engaged in
misconduct whicli Ihe
\,uuld otherwise be reqiti,·ed lawyer
lo repoi·1 h,tijoi· its coj}/ideit
ticil i}att{J'e, ílîe /ctwyer sliall
altemj,i io obtuin tile parties' it'/·i/te,t
Ogi'eenwnt k) Itï/irc
conjìcle#tfktljt> imd
disclost ,1 'c <,f ätich líifo pcrnîìt
i ·,i,<ilmn m Uie ai ,l ) 1 '(,I )1·ic, te i ) i '<,tï!ssj,), iül c„, fl )<,}·itr
• (d) Thìs Ride does Ìiol reqìiìru dìsclosi,re of

i,ìformatìon othe ìn,ise protected br Ritle ].6 or
18
1
The Faces of the Murdered / Suicide and Survivor ' s
of the Old Boys Network in Northern Virginia *
i
Ut l
. ' :' f'·'· ,3
, Vi.'. The \·1:iny '* ic!:í·,i, of ]~o Pictures of

,
rj-i..* Michael Gardner :
John Doe
e."j:' lhe j,mnt: Ch·1~ '
.M-ãil.161 'ih É And
It , Stood L:p
Dr. Robert Rixse
. After having a Hit Man ' RIP
Chris Mackney * Janice Wolk Grenadier' ' Ruth Ann ~ Hired to take them out Murder for Hire
Lodato * Ron Kirby * Nancy Dunning ' Megan Owen Barry ,
Suicide Survivor Murder for Hire Suicide Survivors Murder for Hire
Still Fi,¿htinif & Needs HELP
Murder for Hire and Questionable Suicide ' s in the City

of Alexandria and Northern Virginia
rhis puts together several known facts - through the life

of Janice Wotk Grenadier and different News articles and
bdi)k facts from
-Bullícd to Death- tile Chris Mackney story, Edited and
Published by FamilyCourt,com. LNC attorney Michelle
McDonald, *itten by: Mike
Volpc . That the obvious is being covered up by the FBI. the
Judiciary . the Government and Elected Officials who are
using there personal
"POWER and FINANCiAL POWER- to illuminate those
that they find annoying or whom may get in their way through
Muider for Hire or
Questionable Suicídes, illegaljailing that when put
together it shows a pattern and practice of the " Old
Boys Network " in the State of
K'irginia.
Pete Scamardo [n 1968 hired a hit man Charles Harrelso

n to kill his child hood friend Sam Delegia Jr. which brihgs
was the idea ofhow to get rid ofyour spoz,se / or other brought the question
to the Old Boys Network in the 70's by Pete Scamardo as
thel hits known begain
In oî around 1984 with Dr. Rixsey. That by the 1990's in two
Commercial / Land Development Association known Nationwi
de with
headquarters in thc City of Alexandria Pete Scamardo was
President. Chairman on the boards as an active citizen - hiding
hí> true idcnity and
past criminal history from the locals. This started to unravel,
to be exposed through the divorce ofhis daughter to Chris
take his own life in December of 2013 from the Mae~ney who would
b , tllying of Pete Scamardo . his attorneys whom he paid
handsornly and Jud #e Bellows who
today is the Judge for Charles Severance. That Judge
Bellows by all apperance in thc news and record has disallow
ed any nedative information
or truth on the spouscs / third parties or issues the victims
may have been having with others prior to opening their
Alexandria and being MURDERED. front doorß in the City of
That where Janice Wolk Grcnadicr live ' s in a circle around

Janice thier have been 5 known Murder type hits - Dr . Rixsey
Dunning C which you will read came to Janice's home . ~ohn Doe. Nancy
twice to check on Janice. now believed Nancy knew
more and was frlm what Nancy said
afraid ofwhat could happen and maybe knew what
was going to happen to her) Ron Kirby and Ruth Ann
Lodato. That atl five have strong
connections to the Old Boys Network .
July 1 . 1984 Who shot Dr . Robert Rixse /

Murdered for opening his front door . Wc know who
hired thc killer - thc boyfriánd ofhis x - wifc
But what is the evidenceofwhoshothim? .
Didthebulletsthatkilled Dr. Rixsc in 1984
match the bullets of Nancy Dunning and
they tested? The story the police release others? Where
d was the murderer with no evidence was
a man floating in the Potomac dead whom
Easy for the City of Alexandria police had Mafia ties.
and the FB1 as they consider this murde
r solved.
We then have unknown date and

name of John Doe Murdered for opening his front
door in thc City of Alexandria. also cdnnected to
Boys Network aod Murdered. whom has receive the Otd
d no real press that can be found.
j
Then on or around September 34 of 1997
that on an unexpected cab ride to the airport
Judge Albert Grenadier and step-son of aš Janice ' s x - husband David Grenadier ( son
Divorce Lawyer ilona Ely Frccdman Grena ofthe tate
dier Heckman of Greanadier Anderson
Kícser) as he was suppose to take Janice Starace Duffett and
to the airport and was late, Janice was
outside waiting and not in her home.
Janice had called him to find out where Janice'sl x-hsuband as
he was - started yetling at her and saying
a cab was on the way. Janice can persum
disappointment thc money it appears he and e *w his
tlona spent to have Janice killed has come
back to haunt them. When Janice gottin the
driver could hear David yelling he said cab and the
to Janice hang up the phone, hang up the
phone if you don't hang up thc phone 1
it up for you. Janice hung up the phone will pull over and hang
, the driver than said we can take care
of that for $5.000.00 - you don't have
work tt our. Janíce was handed a phone it - then $2,000 we can
number. Janice tossed it in the trash
can thinking it had been a Set up -
Aiestion it was to be a hit and today she Janice now bc]Ícvcs with out
was to bc dead. Janice has never been
:hough she has rcached out several questioned by the City of Alexandria
times with her information.through Police orlthe FB1 even
Commonwealth Attorney Brian Porte
ier tourturcd in jail)That in February r & Sheríiff Lawtlorene (who had
/ March o f 1998 Nancy Dunning
who would open her front door in
)ccatíons to check on her safty. The 2003 came to Janice on different
question know arrises was she aware
o f the outcome that was meant for
Janice in Septeni~ber of 1997.
Fovember 1997 That Lawyer
tlona in collusion with David Grcna
dier , Andrea Grenadier . Robin Gren
Javid Grenâdier to pull å gun adier passed a rumor arbund that cause
in the home with Janice's girls d
in the home,
1 l'
Fehruary 2003 the Suicide of Megan Owen Barry wit-e of Fairfax
County Sheriff Stan G . Barry - Thc Washington Post rc~orted that at 12 : 30
am Sheriff Barry had stepped out and when he came back his wife had committed
suicide. The Blue Wall calls this a Mltl'de~, but ofcourse no
înrestigatíon.
liecember 2003 the Murder of Nancy Dunning wife ot- City of Alexandria Sheriff James
Dunning - never questioned " oop~" say the Police
when Dunning dies in South Carolina a few days after Janice Wo[1< Grenadier
on the radio questions the investigation or lack,ofinvestigation
into the Mürdcr. 1
Nlarch of 2011 - City of Alexandria police . Fire and Ambulance

come to tlìe home of Janice Wolk Grenadier while she is onttravel
- she is
supposedly " DEAD " in the home ? There is no recoid ot' this in the City o t
Alexandria . Two neighbors have confirmed thíb with Janice and
thc onc who convinced tlic police to not hack down her door but
to allow him to open it with the key he had. l[ was not till Jfnc
of 2011 when
Janice's neighbor shared this with her she became aware of
it. When researched thicr is no record yet two other neighbors
have confirmed this.
December 2011 / February 2012 - Deliberate tamperinf
i with knowledgeable intend ofthe Grand Jury by Judge Potter
,1
at~d Commonwealth
Attorney Randy Sengel
October 2012 - Janice ' s documents szlbmitted into the record ,

when she went to check that they had been filed - she is told <p take them
or they
would throw them out. Janice refused to take them and then
they are mailed back îo her by Judge's Kemler. Dawkins and
Clàrk. The box about
4" thick has been x-rayed and shows the documents but.
never opened still tn the box
-- --- ./.*.-.I-:-- *'.'.'t
". , - -/7 Irr-",717'i~~
-I. Iigill/i I.. -' --
GE:-7,-1E~ CLX'~
z*f»'t·~j!1:*(&6/i#2*Wj
-tl,·l -•""I'»--' '
.~
- ~ € ØTI -tt~ te * -".'. -, -/
r - .-.-.--
December / January time frame of 2012 & 2013 Lawyer Ilona

in collusion with others as a favor or hired a gdntleman that
goes
by the name of Mark Stuart who informs Janice he was
to drua Janice and Get sexual inaoorooriate oictures
of Janice. or to rape one of Janice's
dauahters, or to olant druas on Janice's daughter or in
the home to give Circuit Court Judge's Kemler, Dawkins
and Clark. inf,brmation to make
JWG Incomoetent to file any other documents. Mr.
Stuart said the Lawyer Ilona will go to any length to
harm Janice or Janice' daughters. That
Lawyer Ilona will continue to do what she can to distract ~
Janice from becoming successful and moving on with
Greedy Jew " that all Lawyer Ilona ' s actions are Janice's life. That Lawyer Ilona is a
deliberate to cause harm to Janice . When the Alexandria
Police were calldd they informed
Janice they were Instructed by Commonwealth Attorney
Randy Sengel to not take any reports of issue.
November of 2013 the Murder of Ron Kirby

- Opening his front door - Shot and Murdered .
December of 2013 - Ilona Grenadier Heckman and

Presidential Candidate Loretta Lax Miller do a ' HATE OF
CATHOLICS , CHRISTIONS et al "
Blog - jwgrenadierisalair.blogspot.com taken down
while Janice ìs in jail.
{
i,o- Leahlaxl 234(et?aol.çorn <Leahlaxl 234(2~aol.con,>
r,-, i,-„1' .tàl-v ,„f!1,_ Tue. Dec 24, 2013Iiat 2:05
, .. -P.fln.-·.L' PM
Lelu
want to hear something

more scarier l contacted
Ilona E!*
Freedrnan Grenadier Hec
krnan your witch hunt
is over
lr,-,n· 1_:.Il,T_...x l Z &.4 ri ..•,1.. 1':1-
...' VO . l'·ELU e[.iCI ler'*.UI , N-a lLC..t 9: f-tic. Dc,-- 2 i. 2'-)13
you Knovv what YOU C,IDNT 1-IEE,-P JE=VVS

YOU ARE THE KIND THAT WOULD TURN
Tt-IEIV'I EN EE~ECALI:SEE ONE PERSON [JIO SOMETA-+ING 7-C) ·i'OV THAT '/%/AS .JEVVISH ·,·OLJ MADE YOUR EBECb ANO YOU
REJ
LI[EC~
IN EI-- ' THIS FAMIL·,·
ECTED r='G JECTEZC, YOL.1 FOR NCD-r ESEIKIC:, JEVVISH ·,01-1 ST,_,PI[Z; C»OY YOU VVERE
GET TAHAT INTO YOI_IR
'THIC.L< £:$*.1_ILL. NOV~/ 'LOLJ
ARE MAKING LIP STORIES AND SPFREAOINO
BLAMING ALL JEVVS LIK
1_IESI
E HITLER FOR NOT LIVING
STREET VVELL GETOFF YOLJR ON EASY
ASS GOOD YOL.1 LOST ALL
-<OU C?OT A V\/HIF'PINIB YOI_IR MONEY MAKE
FROM A JFVVISH LAME S ·;OI_1 MUMBLS AND GOOD
H'RE HER IN AHEART <GR \A/HO VVA SMAPTER THEN YOUR
BEAT SHEWENTAFTER A S. (300[D FOR 1-(EFR
GRANDSON A GOOD JeWHATWG NAZI ANO 1 OULCI
TALKING TO FOR MARR SHEVVON AND I HOPE
YING A GOY W THE SHE G ~/ Ve HER
ZIPPER IJP AND NOT FIRST F·LACE ANC} HE SHOIJ
HAVE HAD SE,< VVITH LD HAVE
A MENTALLY SICK PIECE OF CRAP EPT Ht:5;
YOU ARETHE NAZI LIKE YOV ~<
VVORSE A MUSLIN
YOURSELF THAT t:5 INHY YOIJ HATE
LOVING NAZI! you HATE
JEVVS _.Y.Ot-I
ARE BL.OCL EC„ .
1
February 1 8, 2014 - FBI cautions resid
ents of public corruption in 1/a. - 4{,»·'». .„, I«9
:Qr,·unini:-i ,l·' ~')'~ker". v !,ci,jia· 53*Žk)1-
c=,I,4•, •,.. 'Iorai:;ol,kpis.&·r¤ ~ ,. I~w:~, i * o„b,~
WA <Ç HI,VGTC)* i ILS. 4 } -- The F:,ie,·<11
8„ re, n, „ t 'I,tvexr, eit„,„: FBI 14'nsi,
i ) i„Ein„ Ficld ojJÎi'e ix lo¢, ki„W to idrntifr .ny p„ 1,1}c
Tl„· FBI c,irrl,ptln„ ncc„rr, 1„i~ iii Nnrthrr„ Vir,ti„ ío.
ptih{ Ic etirvupt: oi : e~in
n: 7 „';, h ,·„ api,h /, e IÜÌ:tn i. ùt *tn, j:, ei Ij
'gn.·:rnli:e„ 1 - loci,1. ri,11. ,))' 3: d :„,I - tt t·~ ~:n,·
Ijj;:,tiì ,iei „, exc hfl„ge joi · m, Aev. o,· od,er
.·„,·nip<ío,i.·,it, Aj :i/.„, ini·/mh, pi,/,/i.·,·i jree gootfs oi · x:rvtc¢s. JOI · prn·.,[: Š,1 „, P,i{'|':
np/o,,·etu :,/io mki „1„,L'fh<,i.g qf ,·ahi:,/b,·
</i,•ir m .P,•r.,n„iî/g,Ii,r. t/er,·h,· w/,iti.g
Ihr pti/'¿i,·'s inl.,t. " Th,·FB/ .ç,iv3 i„„„ oj 'E/1,·i,· i,ir,·.r,iga
' rce ..' 4 ' hp b ..'.m no,i.t i,ifo pwihc.vm,pilu,1 ,(„nwr
... O , v,„, ~~ui ' /o jwlp ih,·.,·
„i., i ,#, pnleit #i,ij rr,„
i, n, il , M, ·, 1 ,· th :· B „ <Ii'~igl ,„, Fwl,i 0(li:, 1,#
„·, i,p i, %nrdier,i Ì':i·g, i,s., P„h /i:
Cormptio.,
1!2.ULCQij.atï.gE. Hoili,ir ,% 'u)- hjh - f~225 d,1~f »,u :ún úlãu :-m.H Ih:,n , tl
~
fnme t,i il,e .,r„
mptek oj cni ,·,ip t, oit ineh„k ·
Gowr,tm'ní (#clû/.ç .îtíe'h its D,WI 'i,mp/olrl'r. :ttl· tt,riWE,orr,

hü·,ne nr :nn,ny afsi,f=,r r3,,)thi,· i·eelih;#in,lgp,Ici,In)pi
oreer m· i,i·t'n imi,i tmi„ic'l /t n,· m,i<·orx:
C„Ir,r/ n / q „/ N.i ,11, Ii! / 1~ /ev: t. i,iett, f¿, g #how ,;i,i
mi,„,1*/ qo .'„, me,if ,~nntr,ir„ M
4.q,i„ I ,' pri'mt , ni· :ehnnì ir.m „·ee
# 91:I·r.t u ;to I ,t, itig, I: hnúl „fni,„r ,
• Loridoüicmis .0//tim,W .irh red es,ire in,Ysfor.s 50 rig #i,· /,i,/d/ngpme·,·ss ,# 3:irc/oiure mi:/io..i,:
0 A nirsm; rcr,reie„ti„ tr #ie Iti,Hcíai hrrt, ch - n jr, dte, mwher nf ilie i,Irv or ço„ M ~
pet·so, uiel, M.
• A pei·,;on i ·epre3en [1,!g law eiqof ·eeme,it. do s~enü: Jrttgi frnln crtmin~:
t ,r, cmhezzles govern n,t ·r,t Jullck. Jcttltl>r records or smuggfes coi, Iialwl,td
Tile FBI Ililji now rcrused lo Ili,Cstií~tc Clinton'g cmsllh Hftcr fbo
followitie:
Comey tdl, thc prCSM hc huui prosecuted many fur ICNN and xcnt
(hcm ro jai l
• Lurcm Lynch then m:ciä with Clmion prlvikly tn hc, pri
,·atc plan
• It „ rcportcd thüt Clintun thrcntcncd Lynch wíihhcrlit'c if it didn'i

¿io i,wñy
• Comcy 'wo day: aftcr (hc mccr,ng in thc pl~n rcpocl:, ihuc
Clin(on li.J "tio irlxn, i, ivua only curclcfvnc:,r Jid Iioi thit,E
illc :,houldbc cl,nr~šcd witl, any criminol intcmd
. O„ or Hround Octobcr 16, 20 I 6 tlic Caäc ib rc-opcncd
Februarv 2014 mc Mtlrdcr of Ruri, Ann Lodato for opcnm

hc , front Juor. Jaud ,tcr of Judkc (li,immi lorio & t, Ìxicr tn Judge Bob
Giammi <( oriu
FBI. Virginia senators

dåscussed corruption October 9,2014 The FBI & VA Senalors in
*A-, /1'Gln:O '42(ll,r 5/n.i:©r-l cs,7:r~· ,-,cr,*·.,Tr, #=ri-r' 3-,·:,Jll '/; a CD -''f CMC
private discuss Corruption in Virginia
-,- c·' irg on Ic ,---, r , er. ro run . v' oi , 10 ' Lccer . T,
n iur. Ý.Ind 'crrn.r CF.uv

j ,-Lórr '-: p , rcn : ~v., ,* r~or - L,
Z. r> r.1. C.r,ne:LI C!.,:t. .~
: ~~qte
seli.r.C3 '.!,c :rl:r.cr·,>:'ž

The Result to date is Two Supreme Court
Ä Mv C'f:C / J~.%·r·/k,/,I -c,hl Tr.,p A:v.o a.1:I j pre-v> ·,r.,I :·.·Ici, 3en,1.,.
CL· irn,·=, crjim .. ejc: ei
R, c~, 4·ird _ Sn :,}. hv, sa , tl Vcedrer . gay L T
Justices- Chie f Judge Cynthia Kinser and
Hn·S.L-u-, e._t~-- -r-5.'. Justice Leroy Millette Jr. resigning, Jidge
Potter retiring early, Commonwealth Attorney
· ~ !· t'.I»-
·[ ~rL·C~X 1323.e~.'
Randy Sengel retires at a young age. -he Old

S./,_•:- -'- Boys Network retires them early with all
benefits - by all appearance as a '*Thznk you"
t ...·Ul· '2 t .:' lor-Gn, To S, vc 00*0 'rc-'r-, FM, 3 t.3,/., N fi .'.0* t.·
C#a,SCJ,OU' 0",=/·.1 C"t,r.G' 0-'*~.
Xr,at .f; '•*_C '." '* for hiding the Murder by Hire and Su cides
/*out,Io c<*:Øt,nor Coo,
/ncl Cagtø 1*,3 L'RL ' rl.D
/C/ ' LJ,/ .viæ,
October 11, 2014 - Breaking news Senator Mark Warner and

aid to Governor Terry Mckutiffe guilty and admit to offcing a
Judgeship to daughter of Phil Puckett Federal
October 14 , 2014 - Janice exposes on Blog VaLaw2

010 . blogspot . com information of corruption by Senator
Warner
October 22, 2014 - November 12, 2014 -

22 days Janice illegally jailed and tomlred
in the City of Alexan dria . Solitaire Confinement till 5pm
on Election day Tuesday, November 4. 2014.
Illegally Jailed to: 1. Silence her and stop exposu
rc o f c-mails between herself and Mark Warne
office oil the corruption in the Judiciary. Janice r's
wcnt to Mark Warner for belp instead he had her
jailed, at the same time it w: s exposed his "Pay
to Play" with a Federal Judgcship for a favor. Being
ignored by the Senate Ethics Committee. 2. To
Suicide or to turning thc other check ot-thc corrup Bully/ scare her into einer committing
tion and not holding Virginia and the Federal
Judiciary, the Government anl Elected Officia
accountable. as well as the criminal acts and actions ls
o f the Old Boys Network in Virginia
That the law is very clear: That Judge Clarks

actions have turned back time. Giving mc
less rights then a slave. Taking sore:one under
US Code 1994 and Title 18 US Code 1581(a Title 42
): Whoever holds or returns any person to
a condition of PEONAGE, shall bc fired under
for imprisoned not more than 20 years or both. this title
That on October 22, 2014 1 was placed injail
violation ofmy Thirteenth Arnen for failure to pay legal fees in 3 days which
dmcnt "Neither Slavcry not involu is a
ntary servitude, except
as punishment for a crime where o
have duly convicted, shall exist within thc party shall
the United States, or any subject to their
Jurisdiction". Furthermore the right by
state Pconage / invotuntary Servirude violati placi me "under" a
ng the Fourth Amendment right by malici
arrest. This violation of my Eight Amen ous prosecution, false imprisonment an
unconstitutional
dment Right as to Excessive Bail which
in this case constitutes " Restitution Bail"
the knowledgeable malicious intent to wh ch further sbows
silence me till the election was over on
November 4th. 2014. Bias, Retaliation
line the Lawyers pockets by Judge Clark and Ret bution to further
.
Further: The system is one where

the Lawyers and Judges have set
it up to protect each other and line
each others pockets wit Cash.
December 2015 - Defendant Janic
e Wolk Grenadier Stands up and speak
s out against the Criminal Acts of
his re - appointment - tn front of the Judge Nolan Da kins in Regard to
Courts of Justice in the Virgioia Legis
lature - Several other Victims also
:riminal actions of other Virginia stood up and spo e out about the
Judges Courts of Justice A group
of Elected Officials / Lawyers who
practice in front of t se Judges
VOTED ALL JUDGE ' S BACK
INTO THERE POSITiONS KNO
WING THE CRIMINAL ACTS
& ACTIONS OF THE J GES
rhe Professional Code of
Responsibility ofthe Lawyers
00 the Courts of Justíce Rule 8 .
awyer to: 4 Misconduct It is professional -sconduct for a
3
(a) violate or attempt to violate the Rules of Professional Conduct, knowingly assist or induce another to do so, or do s~ through
the ac ts
of another;
(b) commit a criminal or deliberately wrongful act that reflects adversely on the lawyer's honesty, trustworthines
s or itness to practice
law;
(c) engage in conduct involving dishoncsty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation which reflects
adversely on the lawyer's fitness to practice
law;
The Courts of Justice further - GUARANTEES THE JUDGES against complaints

being invesligated by HAND SELEC TING THE JIRC (
The Judicial Inquiry and Review Committee where complaints are filed against Judges - and never investigated
- Read More at
www.proseamerica,blogspot.com the $602,000. SCAM on thc Virginia Citizens
Guaranteeing all Judge's the ability to ignore the law and rule to protect their own and as Judge
Clark stated very clearly to tis good friend
' Attorney Michael Weiser
" Ï HAVENOCHOICE BUTTO LET HEROUTOFJAIL, I AM SOSORRYI CANNOTCOLL

ECT YOUR LEGAL FEES FOR YOU "
The Appearance and the collusion is that all Judges in the State of Virginia
have a Secret "Handshake" o f "You Scratch my Back, I will line
you pockets with WINS in the court room for your Clients - Call me
- Buy me Lunch or Dinner or what ever - but, wc will
ot turn on our
own"
So what about those young Men and Women who go off to war to fight
for the Rights our Constitution Give's Ameri ns of Due
Process?
December 19, 2014 Letter exposed that Michael Gardner was looking for someone
to hire to Murder young girls he had molested and found
guilty with DNA - yet [et out ofjail by Chief Justice Cynthia Kinser,
December 31, 2014 Chief Justice Cynthia Kinser with no explanatio

n to retire early (January 31, 2022 - expiration of her ap
ointment) The
Appeals Court of the State of Virginia had denied Michael Gardner's appeal / release
- Cynthia Kinser let him out ofjail by 1 appearance for
the Old Boys Network. to hire a hir man to kill the young women
he had molested prior to his re-trail. She will receive her p nsion and perks for
cooperating and doing the bidding ofthe Old Boys Network
for all her years.
January 23 , 2015 - The Virginia Republican Party wants the U

. S . Senate to investigate whether Democratic Sen . Mark War .er violated federal
law when he discussed possible job opportunities for a former state senator's
daughter. GOP Party Chairman Pat Mullins senj a letter Friday to
the U.S. Senate Select Committee on Ethics asking it to investigate Warner.
He was part of a group of Democrats that tried ulsuccessfully to
prevent former state Sen. Phil Puckett from resigning last summer. Puckett's
resignation gave Republicans control ofthe stat¢ Senate. Warner
has acknowledged he "brainstormed" with Puckett's son about possible
job opportunities for Puckett's daughter but did not rr'ake any explicit
job
offers. Federal prosecutors indicated in December their investiga
tion into Puckett's resignation was closed, they would igno
the criminal
actions. That Janice has followed up with a complaint to thc Ethics
~ Committee by all appearance along with the Judiciary are ignoring
facts, Murder / Suicides et al. these
August 31 , 2015 Janice Intervenes in the

Charles Severance Case
September 2015 Judge Bellows " ORDER " Denies Janice

Intervene with no hearing , and Orders Clerks to take no other
f ings by Janice
September 2015 Janice Intervenes in the Michael

Gardner case - Michael Gardner takes a plea. The
Old Boys Netwo k cannot afford
two Murder for Hire case's going at the same time.
The question should be for all - What is the back room
deal the Old Boy Network made
with Michael Gardner for the plea and his silence
.
On or around October 3 , 2015 we come full

circle Charles Severance will be tried for the Murder
s of Nancy Dunning . Ron rby and Ruth Ann
Lodato with a police office having told Janice they
had no real evidence that supports him doing it,
of creating the needed evidence to support a convict that the City of Alexandri was in the process
ion . That Judge Bellows who assisted Pete Scarnad
o ' s Murder / Suicide o Chris Mackney
will preside over the Charles Severance trial.
That Judge Bellows understands and will disallo
w evidence that may find Char es Severance
innocent is without question, he has shown this
in his pre-tria! Orders. That Judge Bellows
brings a Bias in support of Murde / Suicide into the
courtroom cannot be denied after reading "Bulli
ed to Death". That Judge Bellows is no differe
Retribution, Retaliation with the knowledgea nt than the Judge's that have r led in Bias.
ble intend to ignore the law and to protec
t the criminal acts of David Grenadier -
Grenadier Heckman are obvious in all docum d Ilona Ely
ents and Orders filed in the courts . That
Chris Mackney , Charles Severance d Janice Wolk
Grenadier and MANY OTHERS have in
common is the Old Boys Network has made
it there mission to kill or ruin th re lives to protect
one of there owns criminal actions.
No doubt the Murderer needs to be stopp

ed, yet the person who paid him lo kill the
above should be held accountable - No o
Murderer for hire - because for free he will take e will out the
that person out. It is the belief of Janice he does
not kill if he has met you - nd talked to you
-
4
Hc kills anonymous only, because ifhe didn't Janice believes he would have killed her by now, but,
that she has met him and he has spared hcr,
as Mark Stuart did,
The " Old Boys Network" is an evil Gang of men and few women with no sole . They consist of
the POWERFUL and WEALTHY of the
Judiciary, the Governmen[ and Elected Officials in Virginia and the District of Columbia. They
believe they are above the [a,v, and the truth
supposedly your best defense does not exist around them, that they are no more then a bunch
of low life bully's with money, and no class. The
leaders in this "Gang" are Judge Donald Haddock and Judge Donald Kent at least in the
case ofJanice Wolk Grenadier. In tt: case of Chris
Mackney it was Judge Bellows, who has now overlapped into Janice's with the cover up of the
hits and the trial of Charles Severance. That the
following law firms have dirty hands in collusion of thcse actors: Grcnadier Anderson Staracc
Duffett and Kíescr, Keller Heckman.
DÍMuroGinsberg, Troutman Sanders aka Mays & Valentine, BWW Law Group aka Bierman Gees[Íng
Ward and Wood, Park·~r Simon & Kokolis
LLC, and other's that are known and unknown.
Virginia Rated 47th and 49th in Corruption - Daily Beast rated Virginia
second most Corrupt State -
htto://www.loudountimes.com/index.Dhin/news/article/region survev finds virginia
second most corrunt statet)87/ State Integrity
Gave them an F . 47th most corrupt States - http ://www . stateintegritv . org/virtini
a That Janice is not alone the corrupïion and lack of
over site or Due Process in the courts in Virginia, the Federal Courts
of DC and Virginia is and are a disgrace.
Yet to date October 3, 2015 Janice has not been interviewed by the FBI in
regard to the information in this article even with her many phone
calls to them - for help to protect herself and her girls.
Update: Charles Severance was found guilty of the 3 killings with no real evidence.
Update as of October 30, 2016 which does go back and forth

-
Divorce Lawyer Ilona Grenadier Heckman in Collusion with Judge

James Clark filed a lawsuit to forclose on Janice's home with
illegally gotten legal fees by DiMuroGinsberg and Michael Weiser.
She hired Heba Carter a lawyer who went to the University of
Richmond.
We have learned the University of Richmond is where in 1987 Judge

Donald Kent best friend to Judge Donald Haddock was President
of the School and still today is on the Board.
James Comey and Senator Tim Kaine were both adjunct Professors at
the same time by all appearance at the University. of Richmond.
That the corruption and the illegal acts and actions of Judge
Clark can be found at www.valaw2010.bloesnot.com in the case
filed
against hirn in the City of Alexandria for injunctive relief for his
financial conflict along with other criminal activities.
But this E-mail of January 28, 2016 may say it better then anything
:
Frorn: Reza . Mohsån [ rnadtci ..= r. oj , stn .:

ez .-i , 2 ' t 'tr ulrnar , s ar.de : s .
Corr, 1
Sent: Thursday. January 28.2016
12:21 PM
To: Het>a Glrg[$ <HG:,gls vpbkfìr·'·i.r.Z
cxr..:,; Andrea Moseley <arn<.setlrb·
#dínlv:0. C·.).n,
Cc: Una. Andy <A,ldv. LI:ià,2~-rc,UN>
iat,sbn<:!é,a S.ccut,I: Thompson.
Ashâev < Ast i.*
Crcuz-srons.ar'ders.corrt > ~.. Ti·:cru&so/: ež
Subt-ct= Grenadfer. et a:. v. Grena

dier. et ab. - Case No- CLZ 50036
* 1
Holo. Heba =and Andrea_
liust rece,ved Jar: ice z, wntten stat, 8 !Tçent

t:iougrìr it apjear ; te hã'Je been mai~ed
o :·, Decembe • 213 . A ,ë 1( L ¿3i ;
goir. g to ncte an sb , ect , on üy , u : t [ et Judg
e Cfark deal v.lh r
Thanks.
S- Mohsin Reza I TROUTM

AN SANDERS LLP
1850 Towers crescent
Plaza . Suite 500 . Tysons
Tek (703] 73.$-4351 I Fax: Corner . Virginia 22182
(703) 4413-6510
rtlchs#n. Fezaí:*,trolttmansanclers
. ccbm
rhe lawyers did not show up in court. They did

not have to file anything - Judge James Clark
links was on their side as stated in the below
IWG Links - Video Update October 28, 2016
5
Jüne 22 , 2016 Janice Circuit Court of the City of Alexandria VA - exposing the corruption - Judge James Clark states he ard Carter Land were
Trustee's on all of Burke and Herbert Loans for Friendship as hedidon June 8,2016. That Judge Clark further stated no financial compensation
frpm Burke and Herbert band directly or indirectly. Which must mean the lawyer representing Burke & Herbert from his law firm would have
had to do it for free - "friendship" still illegal Janice states this is a "Shame Hearing" - Judge Clark States - "Not on this side" since whcn does
Judge's take sides? https://youtu.be/I.05UzlfrvdwI
In May of 2016 learned that Judge Clark had a financial relationship - I contacted the FBI and here is the conversation
with the FBI that has
ignored it: https:Uyoutu.bc/DbdcVaZkItQ
These two videos show that I spoke with Gov . Terry McAuliffe and Brian Moran and showed him my
Box o f evidence that - that I had been
illegally jailed and torturcd httvs://youtu.be/1(OlhRnaxvRc https://youtu.be/JevLIGOtQBE
Janice Exposes the Corruption of the City of Alexandria - Nazi Virginia the place Terrorist's can
Buy $$$$ Justice
Janice Wolk Greoadicr asking / exposing Mark Warner for the 3rd time having the discussion
he lied. DSCF0005 - Jailed so Senator Mark Warner could be Re-elected and https://youtu.be/rRslcBEYAj Q
DSCF0039 Mark Warner Exposed as he Lies about what he knows - YouTube https ://youtu . be/ Ol OopcNIqNA
These Videos are the tapes of Janíce Wolk Grenadier Standing UP and speaking out at the CÍ[y of Alexandria Council
Meeting
June 2016 COA Council Meeting COA June [8,2016 Council Meeting exposing Judge James Clark https:Uyoutu.be/MX:ÓaVqLPPI
June 2016 Burke & Herbert Bank - Lying to me about the subpoena and that he had no idea I was to come today after
I had already had a
conversation with another person there. https://youtu.be/gisnNjOgVkO
October 2016 City Council Meeting further exposing the corruption in the City of Alexandria https :// youtu . be/vNKZD4a_6Fw
October 2016 - City of Alexandria Council Meeting - These two tapes show the
Financial Questionable activity
https://voutu.be/GaNISTEIWLM and The disclosure of the City Corruption in the finances - Private School $70,0)0
- for tennis
courts - COA funded $400,000 for tennis courts - the City Paid $1.6 Million
September 2016 City Council Meeting https://youtu.benrSIZ20ThlA
Right with Crime - CSPAN - Talking about the Corruption with Judges https://youtu.be/IYM6ULrTMO
CATO - Judge Merrick Garland https ://youtu . be/IVIUoBWr2vQ
February 2016 · The $602,000 SCAM of the JIRC https://youtu.be/poQ6uHhSLXM
https://youtu.be/GjaZ6a·-aRM
DSCF0042 Cìtv of Alexandria Council Meetino January 2016

- YouTube https://youtu.be/IZG004Bovlo
DSCF0047 City of Alexandria City Council Meeting Decemb

er 2015 - YouTube https://youtu.be/yd9qz2ukExE
DSCF0048 City of Alexandria Council Meetinž Novemb

er 2015 - YouTube https://youtu.be/OmJWgr_qt'28
DSCF0050 City of Alexandria Council MeetinE October

2015 - YouTube https:Uyoutu.be/cqj5DcHGS3c
DSCF0051 City of Alexandria Council Meeting Septem

ber 2015 - YouTube https://youtu.be/qGavoOLEcRY
DSCF0055 City of Alexandria Council Meeting

June 2015 - YouTube https://youtu.be/2qAc_YqdVUw
DSCF0056 City of Alexandria Council Meetin

g May 2015 - YouTube https:Uyoutu.be/2qAc_YqdVUw
https://www.youtube.corn/watch.?v=00O6uHh
SLXM City of Alexandria $602,000 Scam Council
https://youtu.be/poQ6uHhSLXM Meeting Feb 2016 -
6
littps:„ www.youtzibe.corn/watcb?v-=GDZRL'kJ v781 Cato Question where to go for Help with Sydney Powell - Licensed to Lie
- On July 25.
2014 Janice Wolk Grenadier asked "Where do you go for help when your Due Process rights as an American Citizen are violated?" You will be
shocked by the answer https:h'youtu. be/GDZSUk.h/781
Wc send young men and women into harms way to fight for rights that we no looger have as American Citizens, tt is very scary
and until you
are involved in a Slippery Slope ofthe Collusion and Corruption ofthe Judicial System - it is difficult to understand.
ihe entire event can be heard at http://cdncato.orw'archive-2014/cbf

httos:,/www.scribd.conidoc/303506666/RicoRaci-2-v-4-FINAL-JWG-v Complaint-October-17-2015
Documents the Back up the RICO Claims:

https:üwww.scribd.com/doc/303508177/USDC-VA-Exhibits-for-Rico-Rackering-Jan-6-2015
Read more at:

• www.VaLaw2010.biogspot.com
• www.ProSeAmeríca.blogspot.com
• @ProSeAm
• JAM.Iustice.org - tile solution to the criminal acts
• ProSeAmerica.net
• JAMJustice.org
• www.Facebook.com/ProSeAmeríca
• www.Facebook.com/PSA-Your State Name
• www.Facebook.com/jwgrenadier3
• E- mail ProSeAmerica @ gmail , com
• Contact Janice at: 202-368-7178
That on Friday October 21.2016 DOJ Joesph Guzinski stated very clearly his not investigating
the criminal acts and actions as his concern for
his own life, the retaliation and retribution as well as when asked who is supervisor
was he stated 'rhe White House" not the epartmcnt of
Justice Or Loretta Lynch.
Outline FB1 / DOJ corruption / Bankruptcy Cover Up and others
l. Janice has been reporting this corruption on a regular basis - 1 know how bad
it is and bow horrid 1 have been treated and ould never
understand and 1 knew everyone was being paid offor afraid - but , 1 guess
1 never knew thc extcnd -
2. On October 11, 2016 - Thomas Gorman (Bankruptcy Court Trustee)

was at the table and insisted with this other women that she had bccn
ripped off by her lawyer - tbat he was going to get the
DOJ - Josepb Guzinski to investigate .
3. DOJ Mr Guzinski came and interviewed her and Mr. Gorman
4 . On October 13 , 2016 in court . l was Jrd on the docket at or around 1 . 25 pm told lwould be called
by Mr . Gorman in out or within 30
minutes
5. First in court was the non-contested arguments
6. Thcn Mr. Gorman calls a women's name I unfortun

ately, did not pay attention to the name - will need
to figure it out - D, J - Mr. Guzinski
goes up - he doesn't want anything to do with it. Mr. Gorman
fights for the women - who does not show up
in court so lossc by default - but,
Mr. Gorman puts oo fight to have it continued
- to give it time to be investigated - he fights
witb the Judge that she should be card. He believes
her and he thinks 3hc was takcn advantage
of.
7. 1 ask DOJ Mr Guzinski to stay in the court, as lam

to bc heard in the next half hour. He agrees turns around
to stay - Mr Gorman and the
Judge had seen me do this and bad looked me in
the eye -
8. 1 believe one ofthem signakd hirn not to stay

- after he turned around and was on his way to
sit - because he then abruptly turned and said he
couldn't. l thcn asked if he had a card.
9. 1 now am sure Mr. Guzinski was motioncd

for him not to stay by either Thomas Gorma
n or Judge Kenny
7
· 10. 1 was then left to be heard at the end. But, it wasn't just the end. lhe Judge took a break. it was to bc LO minutes, Tho as Gorman went
runningoutofthecourtroom-lbelieve andtheappearance was to thc Judge.
. 11. l[ was about a 20-minute break and the hearing started. Thc hearing was held
after 4 pm - after court hours so no onc els could hear. Thc
hearing was bulling to me and the niling by the Judge was unreasonable witb no questions
ofsubstance asked ofme. At the ndlstood and ask
for the Judge's recusal he refused.
12.1 did get Exhibits into the record that show the TRUTH and thc comiption.
Shows the pattern and practice and the crimir al acts and actions.
l 3. 1 wou ld learn after research that Judge Kenny wcnt to the University of Richmond.
the one common denominator of all.
14. On Friday. October 14.20161 filed tor the Judge to recuse and Thomas
Gorman be removed 1 file Criminal Claims sbe s with back up
against Judge Clark and Hona Grenadier Heckman. 1 filed a Notice to be heard and was denied.
• 1 take a copy to the Department of Justice as well as other Documents to Mr. Guzinski
• 1 then e-mail other information and request a meeting on Friday the 14tb with Mr.
Guzinski ofthe DOJ
• Mr . Guzinski refuses the meeting saying he would read everything and then get back
to me .
• 1 continue sending Mr. Guzinskí information / things
• Now on Friday, October 21, 1 have evidence that is confusing

and want to meet with him to show it to him, it is ti e for a meeting
and he is ignoring me. 1 stop by his office late in the afternoon. He YELLS at me.
• That he is not going to meet with me and any information 1 have e-mail it to him.
When l state "This is my Life" i a very calm and
professional manner he states - angry and all red faced yelling at me
"NO - THIS IS ABOUT MY LIFE - ME" l w's extremely taken
back. shocked - to me it was one more person saying 1 was a NOBODY
.
• When 1 left the o ffice since l had not recorded it - lsat down and
wrote the whole thing out, that he was more conc ed about himself
and bow this would outcome him then me. That he was afraid of
the Retaliation and Retribution on hirn, then what J had been through.
That llc wasn't going to help mc - because he most likely at or
around 50 was to afraid of toosing his pension - is wh t 1 wrote. That he
didn't give a shit about me - he was only concerned about himsel
f and the retaliation and retribution against him was not worth doing the
right thing.
• As you may or may not know 1 reached out to everyon

e -
15. On Sunday night October 23, 2016 ( and now 1 am

going to work back words with thc cvidcncc that shows
thc collusion of Gov. McAuliffc
and thc DOJ / FB1.
16 . Thc two articlesrcteasedlate onthe 23rd showth

ecollusion and the payoffs to the officials in the FB1
- as everyone kno s Terry McAutiffe
was the fund raiser and got Bill Clinton elected to
the President. He was supposed to be 1 st choice
for VP. The plan was he ould run for
Governor - and it was just a stepping stone - l have
been loud and standing up and speaking out a problem
couldn't control. As you can see in the above for all ofthcmsi ce 2010. Tbat they
links
17. Clinton Ally Aided Campaign of FBI Officia

l's WIR - WSJ $675.000.
18. http://www.fircandrcamitchell.com/2016/
10/23/virginia-gov-terry-mcauliffe-dona
ted-467500-to-campaign-of-wife-of-s
who-ovcrsaw-clinton-email-probe/ or-fbi-official-
VIRG1N1A GOV. TERRY MCAULiFFE

DONATED $467.500 TO CAMPAIGN
OF WIFE OF SENIOR FBI OFFICIAL W
CLINTON EMAIL PROBE O OVERSAW
Virginia Gov. Terry McAuliffe is a

Clinton goon and as corrupt as it gets.
So it should be no surprise tbat Mcku
campaign of state senate campaign ofthe liffe donated $467,500 to
wife ofan FBI official. You say why
is this a big deal? Because that senior
McCabe who oversaw the Hillary FB! offi :ial is Andrew
Clinton email probe. Commic Come
y's corruption is looking much more
clear these days.
The political organization of Virgin

ia Gov. Terry McAuliffe, an in fluent
ial Dcmocrat with longstanding
nearly $500,000 to the election tics to Bill and Hillarý Clinton. gave
campaign ofthe wife ofan offici
al at the Federal Bureau of tnves
investigation into Mrs. Clinton's tigation who later helped ov:rs
email usc. ee the
8
Càmpaign finance records show Mr. McAu
li ffc's political-action committee donated
McCabc, who is married to Andrew McCa $46 :.500 to the 2015 state Senate cam~aign
be. now the deputy director ofthe FBL. of Dr. Jill
The Virginia Democratic Party. over which
Mr. McAuli ffe exerts considerable contro
l, donated an additional $207,788 wort of
N!(Cabe's campaign in the form of mailer support to Dr.
s. according to the records. That adds up
to slightly more than $675.000 to her can
either directly under Mr. McAuliffe's contro idacy from entities
l or strongly influenced by him. The figure
represents more than a third ofall th campa
McCabe raised in the effort. ign funds Dr.
Mr. McAuliffc and other state party leaders recruite

d Di. McCabe to run. according to party official
Republican Dick Black. s. She lost the election to incumbent
19. tn May of 2016 - Terry McAulliffe was

going to be speaking in Alexandria - 1 decide
to show up. My lucky day - the ews media for all
stations was following him around like crazy.
Not the sound, but, my picture as you can sce
in this video was everywhere -ou will notice the
box and the picture. The box is the box of un-open evidenc
e that 1 have and the picture is of the Mark Stuart who
direction to help him find
was hired under Judge Clark's
me incompetent. When the Alexandria Police were
called - 1 was told the Commonwealth Attorne, -
said they wcre not allowed to take any police Randy Sengcl
reports from me. Same YouTube as above.
• You tube me and Terry McAuli ffe https://youtll.be/

k(21 hRnaxvRc You will see in this that 1 am showing
him my vidence and the
picture - the media according to them had deleted all
the verbal conversation ofmc and him. This came
from ABC
20 - The artictes of the $120,000 from a Chinese

business man and the other video that ABC gave
me Youtube -
https.üyoutu.bc/JevLIGOK?BE
• The Articles - http.//freebeacon,com/issues/doj-investiga

tes-mcmiliffe-douation-chínesc-clinton-backc#
httv://fieebeacon.com/issues/doi-investi,zatcs-mcaztliffe-donation-chinese
-clinton-backerl Asyoucanseeonmy F ebook page most
of the links to this story arc corrupt
21. BELOW is a link to the FBI one ofthe many conversations 1 have
tried to have with them - 1 caught this one agent off iard - she even gave
her page # - but again she did not ever follow up with me - no matter
bow many e-mails etc - Unfortunately 1 was tate to the record everything
Above you will sec a link to tbe FBI for 06-08-2016 - with mc very
comely telling the investigator - what is happening. 1 a so have the
e-mails
showing that 1 sent the information in.
22. 1 start googling and doing outlines on all he players and learn the common ground is the
University of Richmond and Th University of
Richmond law School also known as TC Williams Law School. That in googlíng
adjunct professor you learn they make be /een $5.000 -
$20.000. 1 have learned privately they make $35,000 - $50.000
23. 1 also learned that Judge Kent King or bead ofthe Old Boys Network
was the president of thc school in 1987
24. Tim Kainc was an adjunct Professor for 6 years
25. James Comcy was an Adjunct Professor, since being with the FB1 speaks there
regularly (Paid), has won awards from th school which
brings gifts, and then paid for commcnccmcnt speech May of2016.
o James Comcy would then go on to do several interviews with thc press that he had put several
people injai for far icss then thc
criminal actions of Hillary Clinton
o James Comey came to Richmond from NYC - where he worked with Loretta Lynch
o James Comey stated it was bis job to give the information to the DOJ and there job
to decide thc charges
o James Comey after Bill Clinton met with Loretta Lynch on the tar mac became the spokes
person for stati "}LRC did nothing
wrong was just sloppy" in direct conflict ofwhat he had said in the past
The above evidence l believe shows without a doubt the corruption and the purcbascofthe FB1/DOJ
whywecannotgcta , hclpinour cases
and bave nowhere to go for help
26. We also don't want to forget about the cover-up of Michael Gardner and how
our Virginia Legislature and the FBI kept .lent the removal of 1
our Supreme Court Justice Cyntbia Kinscr as she let him out ofjail so he
could hire ah Hitman to kill thc girls.
27. Further in DC you don't want to forget about the removal of Judge Richard Roberts after
RAPINGa 16 yearold Victim-the Judges have
ignored his crimes and his retired with full pay and benefits
• https :// www . washingtonian . corn/ 2016/09 /08/ one -dcs - powerfu !-judges
- got-accused - rape/
• http://abovethelaw.com/2016/09/a-detai led-dive-into-the-rape-allegations-against-a-former-federal-jud
ge/
• http.//www.washíngtontimes.com/news/2016/mar/17/dc-federal-judge-to-retire-follow
ing-19805-rape-ac/
• He was closely involved in the Cover-Up of my cases in the District of Columbia Federal Court
- He was retired with full benefit: and we will all pay
for his fun and fteedom for the rest ofhis life.
9
ikbij ß_
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DIVISION OF V]RG
INIA
Exhibits to Verified Complaint Novem
ber 12, 2015 for thc Illegal Jailing of Janice
Wolk Grenadier
It should be noted - there are 1000's of
pnges of documents to support all allega
tions
Exhibit No.
Description
No. of Page's
Amendment to the Trust Agreement Sonia
Grenadier who's signature is forged
1
Dated November 30,1983
2 The Comparison of Signatures which show Forge
ry v. Original 1
3 Letter dated Dec 6, 1985 most direct letter
in regard to the issues of the forged
2
Amendment and solutions? The handwriting
is David Grenadier's
4 Letter dated December 9,1985 which upset
Ilona in 1990 as it established a
1
pattern that the Trust was being run out of her
law firm
5 Letter May 2,1990 revoking the right to
manage the Trust any further - several
documents such as the settlement she show 2
ing Janice' s payment of $30, 000 .
Will be entered into the record at the appro
priate timc
6 Yoav Katz & Co. CPA - did an accounting
which was not available to Janicc
till 2008 - from her accounting' s and other accou 1
ntings with the property called
Bristow Road that sold shows Ilona has profit
ed handsomcly
7 Article Jim Arthur after he had been caught and
the FBI actually tooked into his I
actions - ignoring Ilona's thanks to all her LIE's
8 The Bristow Road Property in 1965 shows
ownership Sonia & Herman
I
Grenadier
The Bristow Road Property in 1965 show
s ownership Sonia & Herman
Grenadier - The will of Herman Grenadicr 1
is very clear everything goes first to
Sonia - and than later distributed 50% To Alber
t and 50% to his sister Ruth
10 Albert dies in March of 1985 -by April / May
1985 it is known there is a 3
problem in regard to the Amended Trust
this August 23, 1985 shows Ilona has
taken control ofthe Bristow Road Property
11 February 13, 1985 shows Ilona receiving
founds from the Bristow Road Property
the following by all appearance were disbu !
rsements from this property of
$81,000. October 4,1984 $200,000. And
February 13, 1986 of $521,063.50 that
was by all illegally appearance partially
to Lawyer Ilona - This property by all
appearance was sold for about $ .30 cents
on the dollar in April of 2014 with
questions of Ilona's ownership ignored
12 Letter October 17,2007 From Circuit
Court showing they were choosing the
Judge's and Judge Hoss was the first one 1
chosen that once he say the parties -
recused himselfa 2"d time
13 Letter November 15, 2007 again the
Circuit Court shows they are choosing
Judges and Judge Hoss is mentioned the 1
again yet Judge Fortkort hears the case
finally on Wed. December 5,2007
14 Letter May 13,2008 Kloch has retire
d and is now working with Judge McC}
rath 1
who is chosen for Kangaroo Court on
September Il & 12,2008
15 Order Judge Kloch after recusing hims
elf he came back after much ex-parte
1
communications August 1 I, 2010
16 August 12,2010 Judge Kioch has
second thoughts and recuses hims
17 elf again 1
August 12, 2010 Letter from Judg
e Kloch apologizing and stating
as he works with Judge McGrath inappropriate 1
- So the Question becomes how
17 continued appropriate
was Judge McGrath hearing this
case?
18 Letter Janice to Judge Haddock
November 17, 2010 - Request
ing a Judge with 2
Jurisdiction & to take responsi
bility for the criminal acts ofhi
19 Letter Judge Haddock passing s court
the issue on to Judge Dawkins
whom had heard
the Motion - Yet by all appearan 1
ce had recused himself and that
had been
1
verified by an attorney who called the Court
20 Notes an e - mail strand between Ethics attorne
y Jim McCauley who reached out
3
20 continued and than didn't have it in him to do the right
thing. Had Janice mail
documentation to his home and not the VSB
and than ignored it to protect his
friends?
21 Letter Janice to Judge Donald Haddock
September 21,2011 In regard to the
2
corruption
22 Scptcmber 27,201 l letter pointing out
his actions are in conflict with the law
and looking to go in font ofthe Grand 2
Jury which was illegally delayed allow
iñg
Judge Haddock to retire early with all
benifets
23 October 14,2010 Letter to Judgc Hadd
ock on his unconstitutional behavior
in 2
the Court Room and the Tampering
with the Grand Jury on October 11.20
11
24 Article where Judge Haddock states he
believes in nepotism - As hc has shown
1
in his choosing of Lawyers in this case
from Sept of2007 for his ULOVE" for
Divorce Lawyer Ilona Grenadier Heck
man
25 The Bribery - The Thank you to Judge
Haddock for ruling against Janice and
others the pay back which included a 1
very elaborate party at the Monoco Hotel
on King Street in Old Town Alexandria
by only few contributors such as:
DÌMuroGinsberg, and Grenadier Ande
rson Starace & Duffctt
26 Letter to Judge Potter from the Supreme
Court Justice Cynthia Kinser (forced
1
early retirement) to Judge Richard Bowe
n Potter Prince William County -
( forced early retirement ) after FBI meets
with Virginia Senate. That he is to
allow mc I front of the Grand Jury
to ask for a Special Grand Jury to
27 Letter from Supreme Court Justice Cynth
ia Kinser that lam to be allowed in
1
front of Grand Jury on February 13,2012
28 February 13 , 2012 KIDNAPPED WITH MY
WITNESS ' S into another Court Room
denied access to the Grand Jury and forced and 3
to tell Judge Potter and Randy Sengel what
criminal acts and actions this is crimin
al in itself. Tampering with thc Grand Jury
is
treason - all parties have been forced
into early retirement with no redress for Janice
29 Opposition to Judge Clark writhing his version
ofwhat happened in court instead of
allowing Janice to write what actually happen 5
ed in court - This also goes into other
Victims of this court
30 Part ofthe Nov 20, 2012 filing that had
to be approved by the Judge to even file
Judge ' s had " ORDERED" Janice was . As the 6
no longer allowed to file without there permi
That this also shows the corruption in ssion .
the court of taking documents that showed
Truth of the criminal acts of Lawyer Ilona the
and sending the documents in the mail back
to
Janice
31 New Evidence found around April 2014
showing that Judge Hoss and all Judge '
Prince William County necdcd to recuse s in 1
themselves when Ilona Grenadier is the
Plaintiff
or the Defendant.
32 Order on May 7. 2015 Chief Judge Craig
Johnston stands up and rules by the Law
Giving back Richard Perry his life 25 years - 1
later ruling if a Judge docs not have
Jurisdiction and thcre is Fraud on the
Court the Order is " VOID"
33 The assembly ofthc Murder for Hire,
the Suicides in the Northern Virginia
Showing the Resemblance ofwhat area . 4
has happened to Janice Wolk Gren
Clark et a] is not much different adier by Judge
than what Judge Bellows did to Chris
Mackney. That
the appearance is the torture in
court and al ! the above and included
in this shows the
harsh reality of the criminal acts and
actions ofmany against Pro Se Litig
Janice Wolk Grcnadier and her girls ant that is Poor
Page from Jail book showing

Rights of Prisoner in the COA
Jail - that were
34 denied to Janice 1
35. Liquidation agreement done
by Lawyer not licensed in Virg
inia for Divorce
Lawyer Ilona Grenadier Hec 9
kman, Erika Ely Lewis and
David Grenadicr to steal
from Janice
2
AMENDMENT TO TRUST AGREEMENT
This Amendment
to Trust Agreem
ent made and ent
erád into
~ thiœ 301~ . läy ' of Nove
mber , 1983 , betw
een Sonia Grenad
íer , here-
I inafter ca
ll •d the Gran
tor , and
Albert H . Grenad
ier and Ilona
Grenadier , E.
i~ hef • inaftœr
called the Trustees
i1
4
Whereas , th
e Grantor and
.
Albert H , Grenad
ler as Trustee
~ ent• red into a Trust Agr
- ament dated May
ll 2 , 1975 , and
Whereas , the
Grantor desires to
name Ilona E . Gre
4 aæ an additi hadier
onal trustee,
in the event th
e orlginal Tru
ìi unable to stee is
perform his
duties uv ,Aer
the Trust Agreem • nt
, '
1 . Nov , therefore , wi
tnesseth the
following :
1. That Ilona E .
Grenadier is
named an additional
Truæte . and ' sh
all h «vo 111
of the rights
, powers and obliga
tion ,
of the origin
al Trustee he
retofore appo
inted.
2. That either
Trustee shall
have the right
to take
any ae tion requlrid
. in furth• ranc •. of
thi Truot withou
t . the
n•ces•i.jlr of
. th,i other
joining. ther
ein.
3 .. That in al
l other re .pect .
the Tzu . t Agreement
May 2 , of
1975 ahall rmna
in thi same .
In witn• ol wh
ereof ,
the following
signatures and
have been seals
affixed hire
to on the da
te firmt abov
e written .
- Jul ç~5£-ull~
Gonia Gr ' Aadi .
,. r ,JYrantor ' ( Seal )
By: L144 hl~~C

Attorney- in-l
~ct (Seall
i -C
n**70(ÍZLLZ
t HI Grë~adie «
r, Týus ti
ri,F.- . . vtwí[NIK'. . Ù\ 4
. um.C;6*rvr ---ÝPËZ~L
'"h *· *nze
g <, t: ag Arzrt
,4 'nin
.- --/.-z..:ÍI.'-rfkfi,L-LÍ:-
t to Txu :it Agrecrnent
wad
Eiiiöišr~~t~~~421?>j~*.-amå'øti:TXUAeßä~:Ád LŽY3ilbyä;jr<1:':,
hy 'C-,t,odr.M
inn expirct,
--*--.-A-36-i, Bsr
~ a#= Äli/£
Exhibit A § 181168. Forging public records, etc.
FMWNMZNT 70 'riurr AC.m-KEKEYT If any person forge a public record, or ccrtificatc,
1 Thi. ü...M..n~ tc
- return. or attestation, of any public officer or public
Tri- #r,œrranx madi and .ntared into employee, in relation to any matter wherein such
tht. Jod day of No,e»bir, 1~a3. between Scnlœ Or,nadtor.
her•-
kattor cålliá thi Grantor,
ccrtlñcate. return. or attcstation may be received os
añd Albert M. Grenadllr Ind Ilona E.
ar• n , dtir . h • r~hnaft • r I • ll •
legal proof, or utter, or attempt to employ as truc,
d the Tru~toli .
Wh , rais , th . Cr , Mtor and Albørt H. Cr • nadlar a , Trumt •• such forged record, ccnlñcate, return, or atteštatio
n.
knowing the same k) bc forged, he shall be guilty
..terad ln,o I Tru•t Agroib.It datid Miy 2, 1*73, arwd
of
Whir . as , tl , o Ccantor de , Lreo
to narlœ Ilonl E. Grcnadlor
a Class 4 felony.
• s an addltlo
rlat trultio , tn tho evlnt the eriqlnal Trustea li
(Code 1950, § 18.1-92; 1960, c. 358; !975, cc. 14,15;
u.abl. to perform hl, duties Inder the Truit A,r,•.It
Nov, thorifore,
1976, c. 146.)
vltn.,ioth the follovlnq;
Zb ·· .P. Sonia Grenadier
t. That Ilonå t. Cronadtor 1* namod *n addltionål
'0421 with Abigail Grenadler,
Trustee
and ihall havi Hl of the rtghtl
of th. eri , pow* rå and ebliqåtionœ
Fft]~~
~~ her Great-Granddaughter,
qi.al Trui
toe hœrs
tofori app
ointed.
fi~ 1~lborn 6 July 1 990
2. Thit olther Trultoo ,#11 hav. the rtoht to take ~~~'
#j'fjwsz.KL ~1 Madeline Grenadler
iny actli, 1 r•qulr . a Ln fuæthi / ani- e £ thi T /uiz wieboui thi
1„//i~~ born 6 November 1991
noceislty of thœ other lolning thereln.
3. T'at Ln atl •th:- ro/pg:t, tl.c ·:./.. „Vre,Ient o:

-
May 2. 1915In Ih•ll romaia
wltn-. wh. thi •Im..
roo f, tho fcilow
tnq si,neturq
, œnd sialæ
Exhibit B (signature part only)
-
1:t wlf:,ESS ~ntr.RKO
F , tho fol lovlno gt~n
hiv . be . n aftlxod hir • to jtir,;·1 ar.d
on $(alß
the date flrit abov • wrttten . ; havo 1:*. n m [ Ii >. oá hcroto on the Ù .Il. e flrat atw, va vrltlen .
Contrast the S
In both signatures '
ll„I -
IV
Vül,~~47,11~.,
~"
~ ~ G~r~o'-r~'1544):
Attorr•r ln
-»ct
then compare the
·
"Ier" to end the last (~KAI. j
otá- A">,4'ÍL.C fS•§11 •
name 'Grenadler", k : 6 ... M .
KB/*r N. Otu.78315:
.. '
r,/ di •, I NU •, e.
Sonia with Ilona... -, ' .42.-' . STA"K Or VIRGINIA

STATZ *r Vtla,NIA,
-=-•<>*-L '-;B<4'*Ukru.'ltsi' CZTY Or *LöXANMTÀ , To -wit ,
What Is the significance?
Th• ferr/,f'/ ln•tru-,r.L w¢• asincvte,kv·d b•for, re ,
tHÌS -=- ~ - day o . :: Iy , ' 975 , hy : 0 :¿: A
The Amendment to Trust Agreement of G ,. S ..-, 3 ' L ?, 6 :. ntor ~nd I
30 November All.., ' h. WL :3'.:p. -r-•:.:i.
1983, with the FORGED signatur

e of Sonia
Grenadler, In Item 1. stated, "That Ilona
E.
Grenadler Is named as an add
itional Trustee..." ,Ø ..........
.
Ø
........'..'./'. : Exhibit C
F...:.u/, N~I'"..r.... p... ~ ./. .
.
TWO years lâter Ilona's husband (parts)

Judgo Albert arenadior ~.'U.6*. .,nll. -«. U-
;
died, and soon Ilona assumed the .
function of Trustee. ,,
.I..'. ./ .
'....
Then lawyer Ilona proceeded to "loot" .-

the Sonia
Grenadler Trust created to provide
for Sonia 's her .. D,Cf,J,r t. ll,t :
descendants , eventually to include Abi
gail and Madeline
Grenadler in the amount of over •
$90,000. I 4034 9 ·à r, Nici ,
jlqi,ñjr.a, ·/Lr,l,LI 22)74 '
4., ,-/.1'...J'.. .
;
In October 1993 an Interim Trustee, Jim Arthur, was '. d'., n".'
indicted , and convicted for Iootlng
· .. ' »
other Trusts for which A ' hi ' lr , i puil , i 14 øt ·621 , .a~ = ha ,
he was a Trustee ( see Exhibit lc , ü üœ : ý jet . , -
E), a preliminary Indicator 1 Äh,1, ýau ·,t ý,u .o 3 Di•it j oi. •.iv
seen : Jhni : Jto T :·JI :' 9.," ",~/~1~ü.1

/ ndr• : I,1~;:•
" , - ·I-„ï
by his cover-up attitude "we cou /d . • .
s// st/ck our ,; lit Je : il to c , 9 , j .i3 ·d1 . Nll

t '. t '. hln '* that SC •3 lt , ìt · u · 1
i : n * ithir h ,vl ·.'u I,-, t , n
40 Šjoull
. ~
tongues tn our cheeks, Ign t , I 'tlndlt , 7 ·' f
tz . 5 •v¢ 90 - tla f~lr • Ct ·u 1:) ie~vl
:1 U# OV/, ·.
ore the basic ; ivy, l , t r,J M Dritd a • cáitc, Ilan •
j , Tfuici „ but
• 7 ,+ Nmu tt , .rt 4 * 7 • :&* C ,
rrn •£, I . r~d 1 * t thi two 02 I
~~~~,
circumstances, .. " but actu Blgfl • ~4 •,•.Pi
PJ api> k :it . d 't : dti ,. ;
ally his letter of Decemb
er :; T'Il»
. pe ll'It
,p, r ,u·@thatls „,
1·k Llni .lth ~=
6, 1985, Exhibit C, Identifie cl•ar 1 , th• 3,•.4•ont t?:,t .il,-n·t ,tt,Ttptel '
iop „ . üv•. al=~o~g, t iwp,~, ) n :
d the problem of the invalid 1. pnd Ill Itlol~ 9 .t :
~.
tpl ' Jil tn ý~r çhú : Ik ,t . lon,i ;
'4-,i-,~a,t,i. T 'ie i , il -: ;
Amendment to the Trust Agr „Iil,„*
sïl-,I na
TAI ' '.'f .
.'1 '11/. "1'
"a:':.'. '/.*. ,
eement - "the S/mp/e E.Rü'*
",9 ' ~,•, 11 , "",t,'-, ~
; ,n.: .I,at. Ho.*·.f. *r,1 lit l,J ê,rvo *• ~
mechanics of the Trust", and uê : ho . tlá a,; i •* that t?: et
W 4• Jn 901,;
U ~0 :#~,
ilona serving as 'Wl,UOP grl,O,tt' 1~ tl~4t
ia • ihat ,~
ar , •?·, di ;.-ZhLXFN . Cií
t t,LX: ;
: .
i1
·,tl-~1 Ël__ztlîKN@ .. t.ñTE-S~
cashier, without any author & Jt·'0 'Ll; '
to lo ...
P' *'53*ó-7'J'-Lrr >or.n MMT:
lty to do so,„.". ; 63 * itl . n ¥ L, C un ·3. jü il , tll. lt :,
t.ti ·
OZ
.. tv: : Jnùi Dy 411 ·, f t .o ;
Exhlblt D - Comparison of
Signatures - Forgery v. Orig
inal - and Exhibits A, B, and
C
IL-I 4
FAGELSON, SCHONBEROER, PAYNE AND

ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELLORS AT LAT
H #-ur Af L
dt U-
(CONNER -™i AN" W. maVAL 8¥.E~B)
POST OMCI IOM ID,
m[.WA'D W. ,*OELSOM
ALEXANDRIA, VIROINIA 2*ôlß-0297
NOV C. INAIO DOOO-1084
EUOEHE SCMON~K-E' 5(lu Ll
ROURT # PAYNE
(703) 548·8100
~ 1, 'Ll
JAMEå œ. ARTHUR
#0- 6 DEICWUKISTER'
PCTKR A. OINOMAN'
ALUN S. MUOO.
U~ ~4 -6 'L, 1'
JOHN L /AOILSOM
MAK.LL, r»Ah•C- æC'.i-~DCM

**r· Q*rw 8- L
CA-N J. CLAV,UNA
*H/mm L MANWER lw-ll ~~W'KÇ L, ~~1~i

*V# .NO D.(.'A"*
December 6, 1985
~VA-, D.C. ANO ... '.*.. r » IËFG- ,- kuöif
ULA. -f ur 81 Sßl
Ilona Ely Grenadler
4004 Sharp Place
Alexandria, Virginia 22304
t= Ø L -a- -
Re: Sonia Grenadier
Dear Ilona:
This is one of those lett

ers that I am not sure who
be writing or who the to
client is , but feel like somethin
be done . g needs to
The topic is specifically Sonia ' s Trust and the
administration thereof.
As I am sure you are aware, in revie
the title wing
information Rich Klein did for you ,
properties of a real estate there are no
character which were transfer
the Trust . Accordingly , the red to
only aaôets in the Trus
are the cash accoun t , I assume ,
ts . This structure presents
types of problems wit two different
h regard to Sonia and her estat
e plan .
The first problem is simple

While you or you
mechanics of th • Tru • t .
and Davld are
handling now
Jack the assets, on paper
Duvall
the ÍS
substitute Trustee and I am
substitute Trustee the second
. ' I would think that
get Jadk to resign and at a minimum we should
then either have me ser
the handling of · it ve and take over
, have Sonia direct
appoint you and pavid me to serve as Trustee , but
aa custodians therefor
you operate it , or have me and let the two of .--
resign and have you app
This last on• is in ointed Trustee .
line with the amendment
to prepare that that Albert attempted
waa clearly nonoperat ~
could all stick our
lve , although I suppos
e we fg
tongues in our che
circumstances, eks , ignore the basic
follow the paperwork
Albert ' s amendment and adopt the positi
was a good ame on 'that
Trustee under that ndment , and let you serve
. However , if we are as
we should agree tha going to do that , I
t that is what we think
obviously presen are doing . The problem this
ts is that with
any you serving as
authority to cas hier, without
do so , you subject
questions of usage yourself to potential
and liability 99 the runúß by all of the
4
Ilona Ely Grenadier

December 6, 1985
Page Two
ultimate beneficiaries of Sonia ' s Trust . You have indicated some

problem with Ruth objecting to usage
of the funds to date and
thia is the type of problem that cóúl
d arise.
The second set of problems related to this is the

question of the handling
of the real egtate . At this
time , Sonia la the only one point in
who can deal with the real property
since it is in her name .
These are not assets of the Trust and ,
thus , we would have to have
a virginia probate of Sonia ' s estat
We could deal e .
with the real estate by having Sonia
execute a
Power of Attorney to ýou
or David , we could transfer the real
estate·into the Trust, we could
set up a new Trust and transfer
it into the new Trust , or
handle it in another fashion . However ,
we do have these problems and they
should be addressed . In fact ,
I feel somewhat boxed in because on
one hand Sonia is clearly the
client here and yet on the other
hand as your attorney you are
the client , and it is pos
sible that you and Sonia would
conflicting end up in
positions . In any
comfortabl• if thls matt event , I would feel more
er was straightened out in one form or
another.
Please give this matter your consideration and,

with everything along
else that is going on ,
attention to how to handle we should give some
these problems.
Very truly yours,
James u. Arthur
JGA : b
N
ILONA ELY GRENADIER, P. C.
LAW OFFICE3
649 SOUTH WASHIWCTON STREET .
nz,WA Zly PR.IKDUA~ ALEXA)4DRIA, VIRGINIA 22314 TELEPHONE
~k. lions E# Or,nmd.4 (703) 08<-DOC)0
-
ROBERT á CULDJ, ]Rf
KARZN C D,ulr
STEPHEN K. SIMPSON"
' VA 8 DC
'VAIPA
7¿A. MD & DC December 9, 1985
Je f f Crippen Oldgmobi·le , Iric : .

1815 N.E. 123rd Street
North' Miami, FL. 33181
Attention: Stephen Caruso
Dear Steve:
Pursuant to our conversation of Dec~mher 7, enclosed

please find a cheek in the amount of $45.00 to cover the
cost of the flóor mats. It is my understanding that my
Grandmother will be picking the mats up on Wednesday , December
11.
Additionally, the spare set of keys that were made for

the car w'ere incorrectly cut and are useless . I would appreciate
it if you Would see to it that a working extra set of keys are
made for the car before my Gran~mnther leaves the dealer on
Wednesday.
Your cooperation in these matters is greatly appreciated.
Sincerely, ,
~ ~
«aýf't #Lk
DaviB M. Grenadier
DMG : d
Encl.
k'
MAYS & VALENTINE
2300 NINTH STREET. SOUTH
30¥MAN CENTIZR
- |"' CAIT MAIN Si.ICF
AILIN•9-e,I,Vimo,NI*
*2*04 IO- Sou¥M AICHAROION
ROAD
P. O. Box §122
R,Cu.0/e. V,IOIHJA 23*Ol-ell* H.No.E. A'. PA..
1703) sEI-SESZ
V~L«-•0••. (.0- I-/--00 A.ILA/0. Vl=0~Nøi /3005
7/LC/o/,<m ¢70 3) m/1- *lso
T<1</NO/C (00*' 0*'-'330
TzLKK 3:.003 (MAVSVAL UD)
r,LE NO.
May 2, 1990
Mr. Norman B. Schrott

Vice President
A.G. Edwards & Sons, Inc.
P.O. Box 590
Re: Albert H. Grenadier Trustees

Sonia Grenadler Trust
dated May 2, 1975
Account No. 713791018
Dear Norm:
As you and I discuss

ed on . the phone and , as you have been
notified by David Grena
dier for reasons that we need
not go into ,
sonia Grenadier has requeste
d that I , as substitute Trus
l handling all matters unde tee , start
r the above captioned Trus
Agreament was dated May t. The Trust
2, 1975 and named Jack DuVa
ll and then
myself as suceesnor Trustees .
Al , shortly before his death ,
apparently added both David Grenadier and Ilona
various Trust Accounts Grenadior to
under the theory that
they could continue
managing it the way
it had been done and about
a year after Al ' s
death we documented
much of that on paper .
irrelevant Parts of that are
for the current disc
ussion, but there is
resignation of a written
Trustee Agreement date
reflects thi • uccession d February 19, 1986 which
transfer or Trustees
upon Al ' s death and from Al to Jack Duvall
the resignation of Jac
appointment , all of k as Trustee with my
that being Approved
by Sonia .
I am enclosing herewi
th copies of the origin
resignation of Tru al Trust and the
stee Agreement . In simple terms , I would re
that A.G. Edwards & quest
Sons transfer the cap
tioned account fro
H. Grenadier Trustee, m Albert ..
tò my name as substi
tute Trustee based upo
the enclosed pap n
erwork . We can continuo to
security number, u = o Sonia ' s social
which is listed on the cap
temporary purposes tioned account,
although I have applied for \f
number for the Tru for a tax identificati
st. on
, G
Mr . Norman B . Schrott
- May 2, 1990
Page 2
Along the same lines the Trust had or has invested in two
other security type assets, apparently through your help and
assistance . These are several units of a Van Campen Merit Insured
Municipal Trust Bond , for which I am enclosing a copy
of one of the
recent payments and an Oppenheimer Fund . Would you please look
into what steps may be necessary to transfer those ..
assets to my -
name as successor Trustee as well .
Your help and cooperation in this matter is greatly

appreciated.
Very truly yours,
A=
Jamgá G.
5----
Arthur
enclosure
PC: Sonia Grenadier

'.
.
-
KATZ & CÓ.,P.A.:
CERT:PIED PUÖOC ACCOUNTANTS . IA
ål:,ÇILVIZRSPRINCAVIL,SUITE4ÕO
VOAV KATZ SILVEKSPRJNC. MDvm:0
brVDU B,DGRSI Inln,I,ONB
14*Y U]1 om) »1.E,66
öARYLOU MACALALAD 0* i"46~
CTRV, *Rmrz=* IAXÖOBSR-4:i,
YON'A XATZ
LIST OF THE PARTNERSHIP ÔF EACH PARTNER ' S CONTRIBUTIONS FOR THE

YEARS AS FOLLOWS:
1. . Grenadier Tnvestments Co Ltd .
ILONA
DAVID
GIC SÔUTHWAY
1985 13,018 -0-

1986 14,668
13,363
-0-
1987, 15,716 a
34,057 -0-
l9 a8 34,978
14,926 -0-
1989 8,995
15,974 16,800
1990 B,246
10,798 114,581 -0-
TOTAL
$103,441 $131,381
======= $81,298
2. East Bellefonte Par

tnership
GIC ( PÁRTNER~
JANICE WÔLK
1987
9,195
1988 9,195
1,051
1989 1,042
375
1990 350
-0-
-0-
TOTAL
010,621
$10,587
3. Monroa Avenue
Partnership
GIC (PARTNER)
JEROME HECKMAN
1987
15,654
1988 7,827
-0- ,
1989 -0-
6,358
1990 -0-
1,000
19,674
TOTAL
$23,012
$27,501
h®.zlo,t n"*,DXIC
AUD=Trru rae,cn"nmn'rumuc
*CCOUWTANIZ
' Clm 1¢A, rt.AYD AS,OCIAT*
» I OP c ,== m= M k L: c ACC
OUNT»,Ts
lim D. C D<:Trrvrm o, cmt'l
ilrW MæI.X ACGOVTAWT1
Lawyer Gets o Years IJ-Md. B~
For Bilkìng Elderly ~ College F
Ty
$ 2.4 Million Embezzled From 8 Clients rraternit-
By Charles W. Hall I've done, and its effects on the
OMEGA, From B ]
, Washington Pmt St:H Writer families."
Arthur cmbczzlcd the money punchcd, spat upon, dri;
In a courtroom crowded wilh rel-
while working for Fagelson, Schon- hot wax ând struck wit
atives of his elderly victims, a forme
r berger, Payne and Arthur in Fair-
Arlington lawyer was sentenced paddles, belts, whips and 1
to fax, and later at a Northern Virginia
five years in federal prison yeste Five pledges suffered :
rday office of Mays and Valentine , a
for embezzling $14 million from juries, including a broket
Richmond-based firm.
eight trust and estate accounts. ruptured spleen, a collaps
According to a presenlencing
Jåmes G. Arthur, 46. w)Ío pros concussion, a ruptured e;
memorandum filed by prosecutors,
éêölors said had -iýstemattcally Arthur's retiring demeanor disguised cracked rib and a . stre
looted the accounts of eight client
s a life of excess. The memorandum stomach disorder. the pob'
since the mid-1970* and used
aþ said that "while some oí the money At Omega Psi- Phi's
most all of the money to suppo
rt a went into investments, by and large headquarters in the Dist
IY hARA¥ l•OIM*-n,E *AI-070,1 ~001 lavish lifestyle, had pleaded guilty in Arthur simply enjoyed the good life ecutive Director John S. :
.l.•p,t th• Cæt•,plll.' August to embeulement, mone
y at the cxpenz of othern: unavailable for commen
~ot flnd æ niw homi. laundering and income tax evasion. ~
The memo said that Arthur annu- day.
Judge Claude M. Hilton, citing ally transferred hundred~ oí thou-
:he day-care center and helped Lhe size and duration of Arthu The police report and ir
r's sands of dollars from clienti' accounts
•nsor the grant requeaL thefts, gave Arthur a five.year sen- with one injured pledge pai
into a personal checking account, and
ìince opening two years ago, tence with no chance of parole, that audits found little money left. portnit of the physical :
.crpillar Clubhoux has run close to the ma;dmum allowed The document said Arthur -spent tlona! pain some men endu:
un-
ht classrooms for children up to i der the plea agreement. nearly $160.000 in clienti' money, the socíal status associa
: 11, a nursery for.infanti and a Arthur, who resigned from the on American Exprcä, bills alone in joining a fraternity.
:!ten in a 6,500*uare-foot Virginia State Bar last year, Volated 1989 and 1990. The billings The seven plcdges wer
ce at Battlefield Busineu Park. the trust of his clients and the mem- showed "innumerable purchasea to eat vomit, drink from to
ekly fees at the center average bers of his two [låw] iìrms," U.S. from placea auch as ... Bailey,
At- ercise to the point of ex
13 a child. It is regulated by the torney Helen F. Fahey said. l'his Banks .& Biddle; Waldorf Astoria and do homework and buy i
te Department of Social Ser- sentence sends a message to attor ... Black , Starr & Frost. Neiman-
e, and was last relicen:ed in the brothers.
neya that if they violate their truit. Marcus. Saks Fifth Avenue. etc.;
ril without any complaints, ac- The abu3e could occur
they will be treated like anyone else. ~ the list goes on and on."
ding to officiåls there. time, in dorm rooms or off
Several relatives of elderly victi Arthur reported his crirnc3 to
ms the pledge said.
<t the same lime, owner Wlleen bilked by Arthur hailed the swlen prozcutora last year. after one of his
ce. "By the time you are on
:hardson said. the center re- but said they still had not recei clients learned that a pension account
ved notice it would have to ved
complete reåtitution from the law that was supposed to contain $1.1 [pledgíngl, you have spent
ve. Home-Kim Contrâctori. a firms for which Arthur had worked. million had ju,t $3,000 in it, said A3- time, money and energy oj
Lng company, had bought the "We're very happy with the sen- sistant U.S. Attorney David A. Barr don't want to walk away, e.
: out of receivership. Richard- er. lie knew the hammer was about ií that's what the brothers
tence,- Sald Robin Grenadier, a Jus-
i got a 3ix-month deadline to tice Department employee to fall, Barger said.
whose ing to get you to do," said
ve ouL nearly blind grandmother, Sonia Robin Grenadier said her family
mer pledge, who request
Since then, Richardson 8aid, Grenadier. 86. lost more than has sued both of Arthur's law firms,
nymity out of his concern
r e deals in the I-66 cor- seeking to hold them liable for acts
$100.000 from a tru* account han- safety,
: .ve fallen through. either died by Arthur. lie's been steal of alleged negligence involving the
:ause the child-care center re- ing sale of some of her grandmother' Two dozen of the Colle
for 20 yearå , and he ' s finally getti i
res special-use zoning or be- ng · property. chapter members were chi
his comeuppance:
130 financing has been a prob- A relative of another elderly vic- late May with seven copnv
Once regarded aa one of Vir·
1.
ginia's most prominent trust and tim, who asked not to be identified, criminal hazing, a misdc
Chi}d care appears to be a e,- said his family also had not yet that carries a maximure,pe
tate lawyers, the balding set-
c," Richardson said. @nd be- tied with Mays and Valentine.
spectacled Arthur sat six months in Jail and a'$
{ome-Kim Genenl Manager silently in a
charcoal-gray suit, spea Howard Gorman, an attorney for pretrial hearing on
irew S. Good was in Geor king only Mays and Valentine, said the tb~
gia briefly before the sen firm scheduled for ne
a business trip yesterdæy tencing. xt moqi}14f'
and had worked aggressively to trace all
-I accept fü.1 resporsibilìty,- Ar George's Circuit Court. -4
e of the company's office
rs thur told Hilton. 'I have been Irærs caused bv Arthur and had
dis- of- Fifteen Ír:tçrnity mfr#.
Id comment, a secretary said. fered each of lhe víctimš lot , l reim-
mayed by the broad ripples of what ' were students al the tti:
· bursement with interesL 1 P»*
kged hazing also face e,
I from the imiv
ersity .
The pledges might also t
~e to Drop' provide 15 hours of train

ter parents and cond
and approval with set
ing for fos-
uct screening
periods for
N.C. Man Gets
plined for lying to police a,
pus officials about their i
ment with Omega Psi Phi
r, adoptive and foster pare
nts. jaid.
Tìo =+ 1, Pono lt , r King said the 24 fraternit
m, 371 F.415
üêl't
™IS DÊZD =4
. thü 1.t by
or october, 1~6
8, by and b,t
PAUL LEZ *Wtnrf. vlin
™]RTIZ. U!3*AN
CRRLADIER and ØON
XA GRDIADIOK, his
wtf• 1
CLIPTOI D. 1(A
llm; and lm!Ll
A. HATNDI, hiå
vif,} Z. L. NI
UIM anè GIM
U
h•r•inaftø
r cal:Lid GR
ANMR, and
ITANUY A.
oi#nlê ænd
TZDLI IKO~~
TOI!.JR•. ,.
¥lrgfmla, birifmaftœy eallid TSDSTIZ
villflltlll'.
alao all flxturu

now or hœn aft•,
œkta.h•4 to or u-d
tn •o,i#oetl.n with
th.
trust, and partlculazl, disc:ibid as followa:
Run. in Brintæ
villi Mmøtæterla
l Dtatzltrt, 1:*a
øe Wtlli- Cow:ty,
Vir:1•1•.
IMCOR,OUTZD, ül
a üid lå r•eordød
la Di,d look SM
, æt p•D 19: of
th.
híj=I Vljlim *=tl,
Vlzsinla, L-4 R•eard•, t» ,~:à
1* hanby
,-3
%
. · c~ -: 428 m426
VITN. ØØST"
1
asa ofir ,ßod .nd *1=b~ , d=.ia. 4tiaø

· in hane pm~d xt and b .foy• *h.
1
. l
3-
·3
I I '
'...
· '5
/3
ÙBIÒ~ BKI 335 PGI 752
. THIS DWID , made thi • ~Iy of zué/kü~~ ' 19 • 5 .
by and b / tw //n BRISTOW DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ,

~ ~ a Virginia
3 o Corporation, pacty of tho Elr*k pirk, IOTATI 0, CLI,TON D.
MAYEZW , party of thi second part , ILONA ZLÝ QBZHADIU , party of

~ ~ ~
3 the
third park , ROTH S . 491%:11%' pacty of th• fourth part , and
<~ ~
PAUL LIE UIKHX , party of the fifth part .
~ ~ ~
WZTHBSSZ
TM;
That foc and in consideratio

n of thi * um of Ten Dollars
($ 10 . 00 ), receipt whiceof 1 * hereby
aoknowledged , th • party of
the fir•t part do.s hereby
~ grant and convey to the part
ies of the
second , thlrd , fourth
and fifth part , as tenants in common and
with General Warranty
of Titl •, all that certain lot or parcel of
~
-, lana situate , lying and bltng
in th, Clty of Manasaam , virginia .
9
more particularly d ••ori
b•è ai follows , to-vit ,
~
Property on the waters of Broad Run in · Bxontavtlle
Haglste : lal Dlltzlct , Prince Nilll ,m County . Virginia ,
BEGINNING at a Point in tho oonter Of Brl.tow-
B:Intævtll• Road, thonoi io:th :Io
Sa' :a~t 31. S ohaln•
te a point in the North bank
of Broad Run River, thence
along the North bank of
said :lvig South 53- 04'
1 . 6 § chains , :aat
thonoe South 42 • 46 '
th •noo South 250 20 ' la . t 3 . lø ohains ,: a•I, 3 . ~S ohalns ,
theno • South 32 '
20' Eaæt 2.76 chains, thenoe South 56' 25' East
chains to Low water mack 3.79
ef saia rivor , thenoe South
lå' 47' Wist 1 chmln to thi watlr'æ œäge
thanee along thi water ' l edg of æata rl,ir,
e og lald : tve : South 61 '
13 ' last 4 . 65 chaini , thenci South 740 W :ast 4 . 4
ohaln •, thenc • Ncrth 89 * 15 ' East 3 . 1 chaln •,
North thpnc•
72 ' 32 ' tait 3 . 2 chains , thenci Wocth 24 ' 05 '
W • st 0 . 45 chains to th , clntag
of said riv • r , thœno •
with the cent•r of Bzoa
d Run North 76' 32' last
chains , thenoe G.26
South 290 15 , last 0 . 97 chain• to •
chains to a pipe stone tn
and a Einol thlne •
North 62 ' 31 ' Zast 2 . 23 lini ,
ohalnø , thenc , No : th 51 ' 51 '
East 5 . 03 chains , thinei North
350 31 ' Sast G . 3 chains
to thi South Bank of
Broad Ron , th , ncœ with the Sout
Bank h
• toni ,of the
said river North 330 45 ' East
nce North 3 . 7 chain• to a
360 47 ' Wist 1 . 18 oha
c•nt • r ot said inæ to th •
zivir , thence wlth thi c, ntir of
river North said
46 ' 53 ' East G . 02 ohalns ,
oald riv,r /nd running thenae leavlng
Worth 360 47' West 9.19
to a stone , ahalns
thenc • North 350 20 '
th , nc . Ne : th 31 ' Ia = t 10 . 34 chalns ,
22 ' Zaøt 36 . 25 cha
ins , thenc• South
55 ' 38 ' East 25 chains
, thenca South 15 ' 07 '
phains to a point in a bran West 27 . 06
West 7 . 5 chains , ch , thence South 48 ' 52 '
thence South 810
22 ' West 4 ohains ,
thencc South 60~ 12' W,st 4 chains; thenc• South 53'
22' W*st G chains,
theno, South 7' 22'
thence South 66 ' West 1.1 chains,
07 ' Wist 13 . 92 oha
eO5 63' 53' W•st 2.5 ohainæ,
lns , bhenoe North
chain •, th,no i South 64' 52' Weæt 2.75
thenoi South 10 ' 37 ' wi , t 7 chains , th • no•
South 15 . 22 ' Wut 54 . 75 chains to
Bciætow- Br , nt • vill the canter of
e Road , thenoe with th . c. nt. c Of
31' Oâs West lõ.Š chalns
; khênce Nôrth 41' 39' Weal:
This Desd li ezempt fcom C . eocdation taxis te
puriuant
Section 58.1-Ill (A) (7).
Bxl 335 PGI 753
10.75 chalnæ, tbinee Worhh 55,

tho place of 2)' Woæt 23. 87 oha
beginning. lns to
more or and containing 345.02 acre•,
liæg , LISS AND BXCB / r
beln æo muoh thereof as
taken by th. Comaenwealth · hal
improvoment and of Virginia for
widenlng of State the
Route No . 619 .
LESS AND ZXCEPT 3.3
2887 acres, morœ
April 13 , or legs. convey•d
1973 to Ronald
Stanl• y , C. Stanley and Benita
his wlfe , a, R.
r , Ëlected on a plat by R .
Thomas , Jc ., Ltd B.
., dated rebruary
and made a part of 16 , 1973 , attach , d
th • deed recorded tn to
at Page 218 amo Deed Book 680
ng the æaid land ceco
cds .
LESS AND IXCEDT 4
acres, more or lies
23 , 1973 , to Hol , eonviyed March
lis T . Dunn and Florence
his wife , as refl Kathryn Dunn ,
ected on a plat by
and hæsoclat , R . I . Thomas , Jc .
s , certiflid correct
dated October 24 , by R . B . Thomas , CLØ ,
1972 , attached to
th • d •• d record • and mad • a pact of
d in D, ed Book 676 at Pago
the •ald land rieordæ. 462 among
fESS AWD . BXCBPT 3 .

41687 acres , mori or
Junl 28 , 1373 liei , conv • y • d
, to Donald Keith Yacnall
Yarnall , hl • wife and Joann • r .
, ai being rar
B. Thomas, cel 3A on a plat by R .
Jc., Ltd., datid
c.vll.d June 12, Yibroar, 16, 1973.
1,73, attached to and and
thi de•d recorded in made a part of
Doed Book 694 at Page
said land records. 97 aiong thi
SUBJECT TO the conviyancœ of

a perpitual las ,m•
egress and tngresm ovir that nt of
oiztain 30- foot right of
way easement running from
th• noctheastegly most
of oogn•r
the pzoporty in a southecly direction
intœrsiotlon of State to thi
Rout• Gli , aæ shown
att. aehaa bo thi on the platz
aied, cooe , aia in Deea Dook
462 and 67 * ali Page
Deiè Book 694 at Pag • 697 .
LESS ABED RXCIPT 132.

5401 accos, more og
to the Clty of Hanasoas liag, oonveyed
by dced dated October 4 , 1984 .
a• shown on a ~lab by Ross
November and Trance, Ltd., dated
17 . 19 2 . attached ta thi èeed r ,cord .d
D..a Book 1285 ali tri
)Ig, 1045.
And belng the æami property
conveyed to the party ot
th • Eirst part by paul Loe Sw.
Doid dated Marah 27 , 1967 , ony , Tru• tei , et al , by
and duly e • cérded tn
Book 426 at Di • d
page 426 among the land records of tho
afocesald County.
To have and to hold an undtvtdld forty- flvl percent

( 45%) tnt • r•• t irs and to the pazty of thi second part , to hav .
to hold an undlvld•d tw•nty-two and one-hal E percent
( 22- 1/ 2 *) int • c• st In and to the party of the third part ; to hav •
and to hold an uneivid •d
tventrtwo and oni- half piroont
( 22- 1/ 2 *) interest tn and to the party of the fourth part ; and to
have and to bold an undlvidid tin peccint ( 10~ ) lr: tcrest Ln and
to the part
y OE the fifth part .
This conveyance
is made axpreisly subjoet to any and
all easement •, oondltions , restrictions
and agrooments of r • oocd
2
€3-
1
M l 3 3 5 PG 1 7 5 4
insofar a• they may be lawfully applteabli to thi prop • rty h • r • by
conveyed , and to such etati of factl as are disclosed by th •
recorded plat abov ,
mentioned .
The Said party of the first part covenants that tt ham

the rlght to convey the said land to ãaíð granteos , that th •
grantees shall hav • quiet
possession of the said free
land , from
all encumbranc • m , except as hereinabove set forth , and that the
æald party of the first part will 0 *. cute • uch Euzthig asmuranceæ
ot th . said land as may bœ requisite .
This De•d represents a distribution to all stockholders

of the party of th• fl = st pact upon complete liquidation of th •
party of the first part Ln a transaction which qualifies for
income tax treatment pursuant to section 337 of the Int• rnal
R„* nue Code of 1954 . as it exists at tho aata heriof , ana l•
th . e . for .
.*..pt from r - cordatlon ta*• S pursuant to Seotlon
58 . 1- 811-AM ot the cod • of Virginia
, 1950 , as amended :
WITNZSS thœ followlng slgnatur
i and sial :
DRI.TOW DZVZLOPMENT CORP

ORATIOS
STATE OP VIRGINIA )
) SS:
CITY/~OONTÝ 01
)
I, the undersigned ,
jurlsäictlon Uotary Public
afor-said, whosi a in and Eor th •
com
mission aæ Notary
*xplrls Cn the
C . NONT , priæiaent , 19-£L , do hereby certify
-örEFräEE», that CARLA
ts signed to the fôregelng dœed Diveiopm, nt Corporation , whose name
bearing date on
th • .o t ,# diy of
, 1985, hai acknowledged
the *a- before me in
jnzi~~Ïcl~on aforosald, tb•
on behalf of eald cogpocat
GIVEN lon.
und• r mir hand and seal this .. as. v day of
. 1985.
/'pbtazy Public
Grantei Address:
c/o Carla C. Hunt Return to,
10217 Piper Lane InCZCCO IKEV,ll~&7I A)0*IXEO
, Unit u
Bristow, Virginia Fagalson . Schonberger .
22013 IMS SEP -9 PH Payna &
1: 48 Arthur
-4*
P.O. Box 297
PRINCI 1:ILLIAM CC..VA. Alexandria, Virginia 22313-0297
28338 B)11364 PGOG56
DEED 0/ BANCAIN AND ŠX.C
TXIS ==, dated aæ of th• R--- day

ef Fihruary , 1996 . by
and between 3:Lon ZLY GRZNADZER, RUTH C.
~/ SUBITZRY. PACL LEE
mmEEI, and ehl
EfnTZ 0, Cr. I MU
. D. MAWErw ( collectively ,
~ th• . Granto =-), ALBERS J - ~DUOSIZW , TNO: TEI: tth• ' Crantee~ ).
mna JEROMZ w !:CKMNI , hl, band of ILOMR ELY (¤UPM, ICR
. SZYMOOR
0
vife of PAUL IZZ

SHEËHZX, provldu ,
TRAT . fer
and im Oe = iaeration of thi conviyanci maa -
her -y , the consideration riceived therefor by the Grantors
, and Otblr oecd anà vnlnmbli eo - iairation, the ricilpt and

' • uffici •ncy of Vhich herdby
are acknowledged . th • Orantors
1 h•
riby grant and convey to *h- Granti. with GENERAL laRRANTY
I and zngllsh Covenants

of Title , all that certain tract of
*U /.
land
~ containing iplecœgimatlly IOI.4254 ievli ef lana =ituate,

I lying . ana hoin, in t:h - county of rrlnoi william . State of
attachid hir - to and incorporatid hir- in k' r„ Zirinc - ( thc
i .R.al Z•tat..).
f
Th- Rial Zitate i. conv.yid =nbjict to all ricrordid
extent , but only to thi uxtint , that the sipi ari valid and
•*listing and æpply to the meal Estate or amy pkrt th•reo
f.
ZNZ'-s.t
TO HAVZ AND TO ROLD 1: he R- al E -tati , tc , ith - r with all
~ righ
t •. privileges . and Id , Intages therimnto bilenging er
.=UW~-V
1
~.-" I- .
Circuit éaltrt üf Kíexa

trhria
1* Judge,
DONALD M. HADD
OCK
*}irgirtia
Courthou,e
JOHN E. KLOCH 520 King Street

Alexzndr!2, Vlreinin
LISA BONDAREFF
KEMLER
* irf 79 22314-3164
(703) 838-4123
Octobcr 17,2007
E. BIair Brown, Esquire

. Miehnel .1. Wcisei. E.ÿquirc:
3 J 38 Golansky Boulevard:
Suite 20] 510 King S[rcet. Suite 416
Woodbridge, VA 22192
Alexandria. VA 223 14
Janice Wolk Grcnadicr

Ilona Ely Grenadier: Esquíre
15 W. Spring Street
Grcnadier,·Anderson. Simpson, Stárace
& Duffctt
649 S. Wßshington Slreel
îlfd
Re: Grenadier v. Grenadien Nivcstint-rít Co.. el al

Docket No. CHOI 0654
Dear Parties:
This will confirm that thc: abo

ve-captioned matter has been
Plaintiff's Motion for Default set fur a hcaring en
Judgment before Judge Frank
Ncvcmber ZR. 2007. A. Ho ss ort Wednesday,
I,t l &.v,; t,t,i.
' *
Very truly your.i.

Mj~1~ Zßl
b b< 1·ila© d_
UGÏL
Diane P. Fiske
Court Admilli,51}u
tor
t
Œirrlrit (Inurt of
cAÍ£ xar[bria
li}irginia
Judges
DONALD M. HADDOCK Courthouse

520 King Street
JOHN E. KLOCH
Akxåndria, Virginia
LISA BONDAREFF
KEMLER 22314-3164
(703) 818-4123
November 15.2007
Janice Wolk Grenad

ier
15 W. Spring Street
Alexandria. VA 2231
0
Michacl J. Weiser,
Esquire
510 King Street. Su
ite 416
Alexandria, VA 22
314
Ilona Ely Grenad

ier, Esquire
Grenadier, Anderson
, Simpson, Starace &
649 S. Washington Duffett
Street
Alexandria, VA 22
314
Re: Grenadier v. Grenadie

r invcstmcnt Co., et al.
Docket No . CHO 10654
Dear Parties:
This will confî

rrn that the abo
ve-
captioned matle
a hearing on Plaintif r has becn resche
f's Motion for Defau duled for
on Wednesday, De lt Ju dg me nt be fore Judge Frank A.
ce mber 5, 2007. at 10 ·flo=r
:00 AM.
Very [ruly yours,
Diane P. Fiske
Court Administrator
CÝ
t,3
'.
¢[[ ircuîi ÚIolzri Irf xarthria

cAÍ£
]@irgitlia
Judge Courthouse
DONALD M. HADDOCK_ . 520 King Slreet

(Retired) Alexindrh, Virginia
JOHN E. KLOCH
22314-3164
LISA BONDAREFF KEMLER (703) 838-4123
May 13,2008

15 W. Spring Street
Michael J. Weiser,· Esquire

510 King Street, Suite 416
Ilona Ely Grcnadier, Esquire

Grenadier, Anderson, Simpson, Staraoc & Duffctt
649 S. Washington Street
Alexandria. VA 22314
Re: Grenadier v. Grenadier Investment Co., et al.

Docket No. CH010654
Dear Parties:
This will confirm that the above-captioncd matter has been schcdulud
for
trial on September 11 and 12, 2008, at 10:00
AM, before Judge John J. McGrath.
Jr. A new Pretrial Scheduling Order should
bc filed with the Clerk's office.
Vcry truly yours,
4~~*.u
Diane P. Fiske
Courl Administrator -
.
j
.
Avg o«- l{, 2~?D
VIRGINIA:
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR

THE CrrY OF ALEXANDRIA
JANICE WOLK GREN

ADIER,
:
.
Plalntlff,
V.
Case No. CH 010654
ILONA ELY FREEDMAN GRE

NADIER
HECKMAN, et nl.,
.
Defendants.
.
ORDER
This matter came before the

Court this 11'~ day of August, 2010 upon
Plaintiff Janice
Wolk Grenadier' s "Motion For
Default Filed On September 21 ,
2007 To Be Heard By a Judge
With Jurisdiction" (the "Motion").

Upon consideration ofmemoranda
filed in support and in
opposition to the Motion, argument of

counsel, and for the reasons stated in
couxt, it is hereby
ORDERRD that the Motion is DEN

IED.
ENTERED this .iL_(lay of Aug

ust, 2010.
»ge, CÍI#it Court W the City of Alexandría
A COPYTESIEI ..
Edward Semonfao, Ch*
~Bxdüa r 4# ~.~
60
Ij............................................... l
VIRGINIA:
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE CITY OF ALEXANDRIA
JANICE WOLK GRENADIER
Plaintiff
V. Docket No. CHO 10654
GRBNADIER INVESTMENT CO., LTD., et aI.
Defendants
ORDER
THIS MATIER came on upon the Court' s own motion to rescind and render void and
without effect the Order denying the motion of the Plaintiffseeking a default judgment and other
reliefentcred August 11, 2010; and
UPON further consideration, I am ofthe opinion that I am so situated as to have rendered it
improper forme to have considered the motion of the Plaintiff for reasons stated in my letter to
counsel and the Plaintiff of this date; whcrcforc it is
ORDERED that the Order disrnissing themotion ofthe plnintiffseeking a default judgment
and other reliefentered August 11 , 2010 is hereby revoked, rescinded , rendered void and ofno effect;
and further
Counsel and Ms. Grcnadier may reschedule the subject motion before another judge at their
convenience and at the convenience of the Court.
ENTERED this 12'h day of August, 2010.
Jyßge Desi@late 7
Endorsomcnts are dispensed with pursuant to E~!Llu'Óf the Rulä of thc Supreme Court of
Virginia.
#Rig-ÍQI
Michael J. Weiser, Esquire
15 W. Spring Street 510 King Street Suite 416
./
Bernard J. DiMuro, Esquire
Hillary J. Collycr, Esquire
,\ 908 King Street Suite 200
š ?, ' · Alexandria, VA 22314
.- 4*n
l
QIirclzit ( E[alrrt orf Aízxarùkria
101Îrgil1ia
Judges Conrthouse
520 King Street
DONALD M. HAI)DOCK
Aluæmdrlm.Vlrglnla
LISA BONDAREFF KEMLER 22314-3164
NOLAN B. DAWKINS -.GÛFU=&
(703)746-4123
August 12,2010
Janioc Wolk Gronadier Michael J. Wcisor, Esquire

15 W. Spring Street 510 King Street. Suite 416
Alexandria, VA 22301 Alexandria, VA 22314
Bernard J. DiMuro, Esquirc

Hillary J. Collyer, Esquire
908 King Street. Suite 200
RE: Janice Wolk Grcnadicrv. Grenadier Investment Co., Ltd., et al.

Docket No. CH010654
Dear Ms. Grenadier and Counsel,
Ort Motions Day yesterday, August 11,2010, an order was entered denying Ms. Grenadier's
motion for default judgment and· other relief. Upon fürther reflection and consideration , and on the
Court's own motion, that order will be revoked, rescinded and deemed void.
Thc motion for entry of default judgment focuses on the validìty of art order of dismissal entered
by Judge John McGrath, a visiting Judge Dcsignatc, on Septcmber 11 , 2008 . On thatdateand
continuously to the present Judge McGrath and I have been associated with the mediation firm of
Juridical Solutions, PLC. Although the motion addresses whether Judge McGrath had jurisdiction to
entcr the dismissal ordcr as opposed to thc merits ofhis docision to dismiss, I nevertheless arn of the
opinion that bccause ofmy association with Judge McGrath, I ant so situated as to have rendered it
improper for me to have heard the motion for default judgment filed by Ms. Grcnadier. Further. I
believe strongly that the appearance ofjustice is equally important as justice itself.
For these reasons, by separate order, the order dismissing the motion for default judgmcnt
entered August 11,2010 is revoked, rescinded and deemed void. A copy ofthat order is attached. I
suggest that Ms. Grenadier and counscl reschedule the mIbject motion to be heârd by =nother judge at
their convenience and the convenience of the Court.
I apologize for any inconvenience to counsel and tho parties.
Very truly yours,
...
*hn Eykloch, ludge Designate

Attachnnent
'1
1

15 West Spring Street
Alexnadriå, Virginia 22301
iworggrenadier@aol.com
703-623-9655
November 17,2010
Judge Donald M. Haddock

Chicf Judge ofthe Circuit Court of Alexandria Virginia
Court House
520 King Street
Dear Judge Haddock:
I am sure you are aware of the mictake that was måde in the Alexandria Circuit Court. I
understand this is a difficult situation to deal with for everyone. I filed a motion with the
hope of fixing the mistake and to have my Motion for Default Judgment rcheard or a new
trial set with a Judge that had Jurisdiction.
I have filed an appeal with the Supreme Court. Part of doing that I did a Courl Siatemenf
of Facts of Odober 13, 2010 & October 20, 2010 Order to me Made a part of Record in 1
accordance withthe Supreme Court Rule 5 : 11 (c)(1) and (2). Ihavc contacted the
Alexandria Circuit Court and asked if Judge Nolan Dawkins had signed ìt. I am aware
from the Virginia Supreme Court that ifJudge Dawkins doesn't sign it procedurally my
Appeal can be denied. I want to know if Judge Dawkins is going to sign it or not sign it.
1 do not believe this is an inappropriate request to have this question answered.
Apparently from Page Smith it Is not a question that is going to be answered. So I come
to you and request you to please step in and inform roe as to if it is going to bc signed or
not.
I know you care for Ilona, but ifyou were a friend of Judge Albert Grenadier's you i
should know thc trulh about Ilona . She has been extremely disingenuous with this court
I don't believe from everything I have heard about Judge Grenadier he would be happy to
hear how Ilona through her law firm mismanaged close to and possible more than
$95,000. from his mother, Thc Sonia Grenadier Trust. Nor do I believe he would be
happy with the fact this court has allowed her to be disingenuous with the Bellefonte
Partncrship. I have been a single mom to his 2 grandchildren. His family has by their
choosing done everything thcy can to make mine and my children's life as difficult as
possible. They have stolen from me in the Bcllefonte Partnership , Ilona Grenadier and
her law firm are with holding a $30,000 .00 Note that she used to negotiate her and her
law firms way out of making restitution with the Sonia Grenadier Trust. lam sure today
*s 1 write this Judge Grenadier if he is the man everyone says he was is turning over in
his grave.
'. . çlž'
[Recipient Namc]
November 17,2010
Page 2
Ifyou have any questions as to the truth ofwhat lam saying 1 would ask you to review
the file. The file number is CH010654 . The Motion for Reconsideration of Order Dated
September 11,2008 - Exhibit 4 goes into thc mismanagement ofthe Sonia Grenadier
Trust
1 pray ovcry time Ilona Grenadicr or her law firm ts In your court room, you rccall this
letter and think of your friend, Judge Albert Grenadicr and what thc law meant to him.
What he would have rvanted for his grandchildrcn, and what he would have done as a
Judge to someone who would steal from the mother of his grand children and his own
mother.
Thank you for your time and I look forward to hcarìng weather Judge Nolan B. Dawkins
will be or won't be signing my Court Statement ofFacts.
Warmly,

Circuít Eourt of Sïtxtmbria
Firßíttíã Coorthouse
Judges
510 King Street
DONALD M. HADDOCK Alexamjriå. Vir:inll
12 314-3164
LÏSA BONDAREPFKEMLER
(70>) 746·4123
NOLAN B. DAWKINS
November 22, 2010
1
Janice Wolk Orcnadicr
Bernard J. DiMuro, Esquire

DiMuro Ginsberg
Alexandria Virginia 22314
Michael J. Weiser, Esquire

-
Re: Janice Wolk Grenadier v. Ilona Grenadier, et al.

Chancery No. CH010654
Dear Lady and Gentlemen:
Judge Dawkins is the trial Judge in this matter. Your correspondence and filings with me
are misdirected. I have turned them over to Judge Dawkins.
Yours truly,
-»>1 #Af«
Donald M. Haddock
-
4
Exhibit 22
JAMES MICHAEL MCCAULEY - VSB ETHICS ATTORNEY
Contacts JWG over a year ago and tells JWG a friend asked him to look Into this on the
side - JWG with good faith met with him when he was in the Washington DC area. He
requested JWG In good faith send him the information - One year later he hasnt had
time to look at the information JWG sent him -'Mr. McCauley Is paid every day by the
Virginia State Bar to look at Ethical problems - Mr. McCauley Is the Ethic's Counsel for
the Virginia State Bar - Teaches classes to lawyers on Ethic's and at University's -
Question: Has he Ignored this because of the power Ben Dimuro has as past
president, was this a " favor " to Ignore the laws these Judges and Lawyers have
broken? Or has he taken into consideration the Tables at events Ilona Purchases and
how much her Escrow account interest supports hls and other of his collegues jobs . The
10 % Ben DiMuro is donating from his Estate and his influence . In his correspondence
back and forth he has told JWG has been too hard on his boss Edward Davis.
If you to go to the VSB web site and look at what Lawyers with less power have loss
there license' s or been disciplined by the VSB . It Is 10% of the Crimes Ilonahas gotten
away with. JWG has looked at the Infractions other lawyers have been disciplined for
and spoken to' them. They felt they were In many cases treated unfairly when you look
at the more powerful lawyers and what they get away with.
JWG from his actions feel he has scammed her. JWG believed a man who used
his activities with his church or family as an excuse as to why he hadn't had time
to look into the situation as the reason for him to be a man of honor - Over one
year later a man who gets paid to look at Ethics complaints JWG realized was '
not a man of Ethics but, a man who was out to protect his friends, hl8 profession,
and The Network - When JWG confronts him he threatens JWG- Trying to
intimidate JWG as the Judge's, the Commonwealth Attorney, the Clerk of Court
t
and the Supreme Court of Virginia , all have done .
@8 b k.d«)0*5. m. M WRAL (~
1. Rð'0*&1 U A hcl 1~*
la L -L, ÝAÓLU,e~ @ Teó liúljllo» law' 56#l
*j @Ok'
'*ó-MLLJ Ws¿l @ Virpu*
\155 £,hhw Mlu,R *lt,1 -?5 - 9**
January 7, 2011
1
James Michael McC,uley
ou are gaylng. l h=ve to be In Arlington on

o Janice, I have read this and cannot make heads ortaila ofwhaty
1 /28 and maybe we can meet and talk then?
January 12, 2011

1
1 Janice Wolk Grenaçll,r
out there that believes i

o l would love to meet and talk with you - I would love to believe there is one person
what theso people have gotten away with - If you
deôervc Juôtlcc juôt aô much as anyone else. It is horrid
send you and out line as well as my Appeal to the Supreme Court
have an e-mal address l can use -l will
January 19, 2011
o Mr. Mcaauley - lam going to be In Rlchmond tomorrow morning to file an appeal - If you would Mke to meet
we could.. Other wise we wlll stìck with the 26th -
January 19, 2011
James Michael McCauley
o l am going to be with the Ethics Committee tomorrow from 10:00 to about 2:00 pm. We can stick with the
26th. l will be at the DoubleTree Hotel In Crystal City doing a presentation in the l=te pm. t will fìll you in on
nlore details. l should not be far from where you live and perhaps we could meet sometime that day before I
have to do my lecture.
3
.
. .". 730
January 28. 2011
Janlce Wolk Grenadier
o HIJim,
to gel this
Thank you again for meeting with me - My cable and electric went out wlth the storm - l wanted
still In town - or back In Richmond -
right - l have the Information for you - l was wondering If you were
Please let me know so - l can get this to you -
Thank you again- I am very grateful to you -
Jwg
February 7, 2011
Jamoœ Michael McCauley
with the General Assembly

o got your package. as you know. l have been tied up atl last week and this week
~1 pn various bìlls affecting the bar. l will try to get reading your material as soon as possible.
February 11, 2011
a Thonk you - l look fornrd to he=rlno what options you may think l have -
February 14, 2011
Janice Wolk Grenadler 1

%
o HI - Happy Valentines Day - Hope your day Is full of love - 1 really appreciate your helpt h
J
k
.
Fobruery 28, 2011
S
'.
Janice Wolk Grenadler
15 W Spring Street
703-623-9655
jwolkgrenadler@aol.com
September 21, 2011
Judge Donald M. Haddock

Circuit Court of Alexandria Virginia
520 King Street
Dear Judge Donald M. Haddock,
Alexandria all
On September 7,2007 by appearance and actions of the Circuit Court of
Judges recused themselves . The Circuit Court of Alexandria did not follow the rules of
1 my Civil
The Supreme Court of Virginia Rule 17.1-105(b) This was in violation of
The Law of the Supreme Court of Virginia which
Rights, my Constitutional Rights, and
conclusio n you either you did not
as a Judge you have the responsibility of knowing. In
know the law - incompetence, or, you ignored the law - unconscionablel
I understand many courts have found that judges who have acted in their judicial
capacity were entitled to immunity. But, courts have fouhd that the judges who acted
outside of their judicial capacity were not entitled to Immunity. Which l believe Is in
yours and all the Judges from September 7,2007 who have ruled on my case are in
violation of many different laws which you lose Immunity. Under the common law,
judges are generally immune from clvll liability for judicial acts, but they do not enjoy this
immunity when there Is criminal liability. Judges are not protected by Immunìty when
they have acted In "the clear absence of all jurisdictions." I believe in this case You and
all the Judge'B from this date have acted with Mallce and Clear Intent to follow your
wishes Judge Haddock the head Judge of the Circuit Court of Alexandria - who to my
face told me I would not get a fair trial and how they 'Loved Ilona'.
You are a trespasser of the law, as the head Judge - the Judges you choose to
hear my case did not have subject-matter Jurisdiction and there orders are vold,
of no legal force or effect Whenever a Judge acts where he/she does not have
jurlsdlction to act, the judge Is engaged In an act or acts of treason. When judges
act when they do not have jurisdiction to act, or they enforce avoid order (an ....
order issued by a judge without jurisdiction), they become trespåssers of the law, N
and are engaged In treason.
l gave The Circuit Court of Alexandria an opportunity to fix this error- Instead you
personally have added insult to injury causing me much stress - even more upsetüng
what this has done to my children . How many times have the police come to my home
to make sure l have not committed suicide over what actions you out of your 'LOVE" for
Ilôñå håvê tåkêrl. Ilônå Grënåólêr whô Ilêd In Court - but, Ig a part or your club.
vt
1
You have lost your immunity . You as a judge did not follow the law , i . e . you are a
trespasser of the law, you as a judge have lost subject-matter jurisdiction and your
orders should be void, of no legal force or effect. The U.S. Supreme Court, In Scheuer
v. Rhodes, 416 U.S. 232, 94 S.Ct. 1683, 1687 (1974) stated that "when a state officer
acts under a state law in a manner vlolatìve of the Federal Constitution, he "comes into
conflict with the superior authority of that Constitution, and he is in that case stripped of
his official or representative character and is subjected in his person to the
consequences of his individual conduct The State has no power to Impart to him any
Imrnunity from responsibility to the supreme authority of the United States."
1 have gone to the JIRK committee to the VSB - The Supreme Court of Virginia, to my
State Representative . To be told I have no rights 1 am not a part cf The Virginia Old
Boys network.
THEREFORE l will be filing suit against all parties who have decided I am not of value
to deserve a fair trial . Who have violated The Rules and discriminated against me. I
am notifying everyone of this - On Wednesday September 28, 2011 if I have not heard
from you lwill assume you are not interested In settling this and will file suit âgalnst you .
Warmly,
Janice Wolk Grenadler
Pro-se Party
V-i
September 27, 2011
The Honorable Donald M. Haddock

Chief Judge
Circuit Court of the City of Alexandria
520 King Street
Re: Request for Presiding Judge to Impanel a

Special Grand Jury
Dear Judge Haddoclc
Reading the Virginia Constitution and the Code of Virginia, as well

as some supreme
Court of Virginia Rules and Handbooks, l have
learned:
1. Code of Virginia § 19.2-191 (2) and on, plus the

October2010 edition of the
Virginia supreme Court Handbook for Grand Jurors
Section 23, titled
"Convening", states:
"Any citizen or group of citizens may ask the Circuit

Court of a city or
county to convene a Special Grand
Jury."
Further,
2 . Handbook for Grand Jurors, Section

26, titled ' Functions of a Special Grand
Jury" states:
'As has been set out in Section 3, a Special

Grand Jury Is composed of from
seven to eleven cltlz•ns of a city or coun
ty, selected by the Circuit Court and
summoned to investigate any condition
which tends to promote criminal
activity in the community or by any gover
nmental authority, agency or ofncial.=
"The Special Grand Jury, composed entire
ly of private citizens, Is the one
nonpolltical body with legal authority
to make such investigations."
Research reveals four ways in

which a Citìzen may ask the Court to
convene a Special
Grand Jury . One way is for a Citize
n to request the Presiding Judge to
impanel a
Special Grand Jury. By this letter,
! exercise my First Amendment Righ
government for a redress of griev t to Petition the
ances, to the proper agency of gove
Special Grand Jury, by rnme nt, the
this, my request to you as the Presiding
promptly. Judg e , to impa nel one
60
You have lost your immunity. You as a judge did not follow the law, i.e. you are a
trespasser of the law , you as a judge have lost subject-matter jurlsdlctlon and your
orders should be void , of no legal force or effect. The U. S. Supreme Court, in Scheuer
v. Rhodes , 416 U . S. 232 , 94 S. Ct 1683 , 1687 ( 1974) stated that "when a state officer
acts under a state law ìn a manner violative of the Federal Constitution, he "comes into
confllcl with the superior authority of that Constitution, and he Is in that case stripped of
his official or representative character and is subjected in his person to the
consequences of his individual conduct. The State has no power to impart to him any
immunity from responsibility to the supreme authority of the United States."
l have gone to the JIRK committee to the VSB - The Supreme Court of Virginia, to my
State Representative. To be told I have no rights l am not a part of The Vlrglnla Old
Boys network.
THEREFORE I will be filing suit against all parties who have decided l am not of value
to deserve a fair trial. Who have violated The Rules and discriminated against me. l
am notifying everyone of this - On Wednesday September 28.2011 if 1 have not heard
from you l will assume you are not interested in settling this and will file suit against you.
Wannly,
Pro-se Party
h 15 West Spring Street
October 14, 2011
Honorable Donald M. Haddock

Gmnd Jury Prcsidíng Judge
Cirouit Court of Alexandria
520 King Street
Dcar Judge Haddock:
Ill Court on Tuesday October 11, 2011 after ñling the appropriate paper work to bc
scheduled by the Clerk of the Circuit Court to make a Presentment before the Grand Jury,
as is ANY CmZEN's RIGHT; prior to your enteringthc Courtroom, I was first told by
Mr. Semonian, with Mr. Sengel standing nearby overhearing our conversation, that while
I was not on lhe list. I would be scheduled to speak to the Grand Jury that day.
Then you came in and "over-ruled" Mr. Semonian in his DUTY as a Constitutional
Officer. On what authority, "chapter and verse", or Virginia Code section or VBC Rules?
Ofcourse, Mr. Semonian failed to exerthis authority to arrest yourviolation of Virginia løw.
You may want to huddle with Randy Sengel, where he too over-reached his authority or
tried to deceive me by his craftily worded letter of October 5, 2011, saying:
~*
You are not a material witness to any of the cnqpq to be presented. [Note: byMr. Senâel]
Accordingly, unless ordered by the Court to do ctherwise, I do not intend to list you as a
presenting witness forthe session ofthe regular grandjuryon October 11,2011."
I was NOT asking to be one of Mr. Sengel's witnesses, I was exercising MY RIGHT to
address the regular grand jury on a Felony matter thmt Mr. Sengel in his flawed exercise
of "Prosecutorial Discretion", or based on '*fear or favor" of Ilona decided not to
prosecute.
Then you came Ìn and sat on the bench and said as well as I was able to record:
"While I planned on letting you speak to the grand jury but have decided against it
because you are likely to be talking aboutjudges, including me. Therefore, I am referring
the matter to the supreme Court to assign ajudge from anotherjurisdiction to hearthe
case on December 12~ at 9 a.m."
Then my attorney (attorney in fact per Virginia Code § 26 - 97 , § 26- 106, and § 26- loD
tried to assist your understanding that I had TWO issues to present to the regular grand
jury; one, as you rightly guessed, about criminal actions by various local past and present
judges, where your proposal to have the Chief Justice assign a judge from outside this
Circuit to preside over a session ofthe grand jury had some merit, but the other cases of
Felony Forging, Uttering and Forging Public Records by powerful, politically connected
remarried widow, Ilona Grenadier, of former Chief Judge Grenadier, once my
father-in-
law.
October 14,2011
Page 2
What I say and what I do in front of a Grand Jury is my business, and the business of the
gmndjurors and not yours. The Jury Foreman has the duty to decide how much and how
long cacll Privntc Citizen or Public Servant is allowed to speak before the grand jury, not you .
If any Citizen who presents before the grand jury is unmly, then the Bailiffs are just
outside the door to reestablish civility. And you would be presumptuous in the extreme
to deny my RIGHT to speak to the grand jury because you had some thought Ìn your
mind that I might be unruly.
It is a First Amendment Right to "petition the government for a redress of grievances".

Some legal scholars have described the grand jury as the "fourth branch of government".
The Founding Fatherg considered the Jury to the Jurists Úudges) like the Housc is to the
Senate in a Bi - Cameral Judicial Branch, yet now departed Chief Justice Hassell in
his
2008 "State of the Judiciary" speech identified that Virginia suffered over a 69 percent
decline injury trials from 1999 to 2008. That is pretty muchthe definition of disaster!
If you had clone yourjob as judge legally-why would you have anything to worry about?
Youhave again abused my rights as a citizen. Was part of your deception choosing the
date of December 12, 2011 that puts us past your retirement datc?
'
Please inform mc immediately as to what your retirement date is
. 1 am no longer in
agreement that it will take till December 12, 2011 to be heard and will be
filing to be
hcard inNovcmber.
Let me stress to you - once again you have played me a

fool. Ya ' 11 did it with Dawkins
and the dates he became a Judge versus the date Kloch retired, but
I will not be played a
Fool by you agaìn.
I hope you cnioy the enclosed information about Ilona Grcnadier-the women
you
"Love':
Thank you.
Sincerely,
Janice Wolk Grcnadicr
Copy to: Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli, Chief Justice

Cynthia Kinser, "Randy" Sengel
ü
1
IAâkáh *)9 jtll
CDDNECMON ~
Doctors Express'
I,O/E 1 I.ATEFV I LOCAL I l-S,C-,-IOI I *,Oql, ' PHOTO OAULCRT 1 PRINT CDIT:0*S ONLINE I CONTACT 115
SKAmol
gl A--=0.EARCH Honday, Octohf 31, 2011 teST)
N...
Clrcult Campaign
Thmi undldat. œmæ,oi Is polmnttål mplæc..n.nts foi i.Ilrlng Cl,çult
- Edlll.'v .
Court judge
BV Mk/d . Pop• 'j W

0 './C
Au,1*Iy, Ulfch 10, 2011
t,Et I«IC; annouf~In,~r~t Ut.t Do.•Id Hasdock S,„ ,•ti . it.oo- eo-I frorn t.i
6
C,rrult Court rllwisents I chap,gl~, O~ lh• 9%,a~d al lk. clty couru',09,e. wlui the
(*y' $•*r junft hanglr g uo ms robe at ti e end of thl ysw. But R alto opens up i tit.I /r,AGINS, h,i.l
P,n"ØMU-a *F.Naø/.-*ar,uu
h)*y œvated : potofl the berlcll, Ind three Dotentlal C,nde,tlc Mvi already
C..PU.....b«.. '.*8,.......D,
•m•ro,0 to lucc*œd Hêddoclt - Ger,ial D•t,Ict Cowrî Cni~ Jwdge 8•c~y Moor·,*
ittô,Iwy Nm Cl*A .d IHO,ney Tb..0* Datti M,Pi c.r.J,da,e, Io.4* siœo for-a~/ •„.b,•, * 0•-•,•ME.... C~~k R~h~
W¢n P fldly'G dea~l to Iwbmit I Ouiåttenia. lo thœ Aliuir.drle Bo, As;oclallon.
Tm Plooeh,I tnåt U,i Ginira, Atsimbly wl not Iñti,fœie wilh th, ¥,itl of our
cor•,rnu#'M.. s.d Del. 0'..'W- Hœ,ftf,o (0-4 61 Wme 1. C..nøln.tl.g CV,dsl/Ill
Ir,%,rv~ev,& *Ith potenllal car,dldætœ*. *Clf cour'te, thu, ålwiv; i conc~rñ.•
/#//' "/v...../. /../ Ô'.melk ngtv.~ b/l./. *ulœ R.ou~uc/ns ånc

D-nocra"( ...,bers oø th' kxæl 0*eoat'.. *cluølno . d.a.Dc. '..do# I. XX~
TMCB WP,œn N *8•Oernocratk IOC,1 0**atkoft auope,ted X~*n90 indj C]Drr-Stlc
Re#ilo,Is C-rt,ud~ No,I. 0..MM, -ntt,..I R=uellcßi
Dupport.Ø 88!Se.
*-* LI•• #*, e,n~-. , como,on**, g,n-æ DAO *ne • Clfcwlt
Cev#1 jvl,i In Mlfgn 200§. Tñia la laßl, a pl#In
Glslgr,Irnlnt ov,r œ
Møu»to,y þosn,on åtilleo I vote on Mldål VEJKIH IM AI-Müli. Nc- 1*olstætoi;
pl hoolng to fl Hlddock~å slêt e,1 thi court du,i'o "'ei '•*tloi '•w¢ --Vh.
.
1.'r. hop.M thi: •AH b. , n.ñpsfl),in proce,C MIO Dei AO/m Eboln (C}-~9). Am'...' N.#*4 ....".*/./ *..
-Wa·8 -æl -nh •nv dlmcunv whe„ œ.. " it I"S•S.- /.L.•...h %.// *.7. ~ './-I
ualv,nMv. Ap», V.™.4 he, 1*%, ~, F..

HAOOOCIC HAS 11!N eñ th, bench strbc~ May 1981, wh.n D•,Met,a~¢ Ce/. Chu,&
Rôbt} aooalntld him te nt a vlclncy c,e,t«, by th.
ieslgnstkø, of Chls¢ Jw~g, WHœv N"I, ""0* ' I AJ#" ml,0 "I b"I"' '
Wr,Iht. Thi N,nir,1 A--I,Iv -a• •vo»olid tl tihi w, thi vlaicy ti IU r•to /4./..N. /.......#., ., LD..L
0*&'-..'"..d'.- * .'.*
N=i•n BK YI,r. bu< -*Sn'l at~I te 9* e,Oun~ to t I,Ciute O¢ a 2,0* numcir O~
-* .*../"... ..."1 D.UIO
'· · - .So Robb usld hl,
DOv,er to makœ ß Inta,lm :ooN*tm*< apd t),~ C.n.,i humbly I.l.i r•tølœd :hs CI.*).... D.....&... 0......y .
1".. SN• l'.•1'."I, t'• g'1•' 1.'• •I,h.
Ch•kå. leœusl Heddo~ la ovl, 70, he v„N,Id t» Iro/gibl~ /w inolhi, te,m.
'.".. 'I -n. '. ' j.Øœ. I. ~.! ."'#
-1 :*Y ü d,œc,W„.Itory, M thoi, i,e U,€ r~t j,' 3016 ,tste
3,n. Patsy ncår (D-
30). -1, my olbnlon, UVO,vlf,O a-ay *x,i#lu fer Y,Uth doißt FM•*I Inv S~nH.'
W/e MI/*, the last Ume a,o,Irno, haø iueolmd

a CI.,bl Court juigœ h
Allia-ti turnld iut tl bl e short·œvld t•rm. :n 1~73, Reoubllc, ~ Gov. U/n¥Ooò
Holto,1 ID,elntid fellow Ripubllum W~Iltån, 1~oo,Itz lo the
Ipæd,0 I nerce g»,ti,sn bact,I blncn. Thl Wlldlon
In thi Ge-N Aäiembly, W Kooñtr,
:irm 181:œd
-l=pji'
*y . f- mo.,ths. DSMOG,It, * ß, Gener*1 Aås,Wy s~Iectad Donad Kœnt, ¥,~o
.'¥•d uf,tll 1 DN. tn 2008. H/'*/*' .'.... .../1./ t~ thi G..•,•t C)4*tikt
CeuM /æ,IZWI /M.lowll, h,Id bv RI:,•~t C~â,Iimona.
Tve Dœœn •s~d l SæY æ fevnvofS *beut Mootlgre,48~Ø~c~ e,Kk~~ at W so~*

In,taålitlon clrlmeiy, '1'n, Iñ flvor of t-----"0---
--------
.-I- . - ,
00# TWO CANO,DATIS. tri,I~tei prociu wm •swn~* I p,oi,6*.N,4¥,M

WM<, Bl OI.I'œl AISI,ebly dluiolre,d thi Ili of the A*-nodi Baq As~cüuon.
M :*I late 1090, ¥,4" Geier $ D,etrtcx Court jlcql 0*nlli
PIMSI 0 I;lhlly
ai„o,b,Clc NG %4„,IN, Ctar# å,I Moon Ii/I beß 'Iik~* D §**t iad bi:* A n."...' A»....l.. Oa,h v.dua'.d
.m-, at e rlrm tn-, =tvn aå Unø, Cla,tt, Canol, *Md Me,~dœlso~ (no. t.and. /ri,I 1.C. Wlll,m, MVI Och•IM IDGI
C]an, Carrezl, Menøllge n and Sisk). Thi bw Ilsocl,Uen chci.
CID,k, but the local
**8., AN.F ...... './- ..../..
Wloå:IM cho,I Moefœ - I,- nrst Fæmale u, I„r.I ss I ]Idoi e,' I'~ G•nI,SI -***,eN, -~*#. /*#.
Shl na s rlcugaa nœrsllr fforn Rlvtng any catas that afl å,guld Dy W lumlr •• • ~,•Ø•€,e•r ~••, C,mme"=I.nn·a
üw
UI•*mo¥ -NU•.C-414. In lm. h•
'Attnls judlc#at liwt, mv,y' " ...œvun. ~&*./ a.....hn•=.

8 IN-Ve/: Mooræ toll Be Gliltil Pacltet In ø 1998
l by
IntI,~æw. 'Sô veu hlvl te bl
partlculwly øe,~Ittvi to Il I thlt Jwltks I s ckens. and te See I~,at :hi pis,1. t,efo,e . 6, * œe~Vat -.Url ~Ud,• IR
YOU --§ . œuf.,It.'",' t.-,
5.Cœ tæ.AO . DO:Rlon 0" thœ court~ Moo- 'itl. t- thi ...i
*'. '..0....d
cr,Slec I sutitltwll juclgeì K,drrv. She Vllidld Ovw I härdful
cf htgþ~.t,eflle
l I"3
caseß. Indudlpio the drunk·dnvtno Ulli of U. S.
RID. Vito FIU,Ili (A-N.V.).
Ct,M has al,0 ma!.t,tnid , *thol p,onle, rœcn,inuig citinu
svcn a; Allw,non,
Po•cœ CNIF Oivlq Dlkir anl/ ha was 8„ts™á !0'
tl~ CHI of »,Ilo Thurrnan. i,i Al=*ndr,a man
d," k dtli"W . Clarit also t"' o" pl
DNA Ivldaxl D,ovid he wa, mneceAL
who spim 10) yla,§ * odlon b•fo,M , rl
91* *cary to U•¢,# Ehat ZI·Ie lyglrn iopl:ld

Ehl way that It iu designed ta vvo,k,*
Clv·4 „Ic In a 20>03 Inlin,Ie,v:And
Ihls 1*slice stlll occw,rü.-
COURT WATCHERS a,e e.0-*y antlclo#Ino th,

vcta of thi AI.and,tD 9,r
Alsotjlüon. v,h d Could sli
ßl n:a,e lv **Ithv,ot~tl
d gon Icl with thœ k#
dœtio~UMN AI-„*Ia :a•vnlker;
6~di to oo MM a cho~* 't~~' th~
th~ M
;44(t•0
Akh"nam DY 0%l Oar Iuocjltloa, that could crl:El u opoorlui®y fe, Rioubêcimi li
swpg»4 All D'n c'Iøk'tl. OR
Md Ehœ local 6*»Oatlon out th~Ir
t~N'ol"'MI'6, " tn' Dar a'eelæt
lci
'li I.MI., „ CŽ-
Iuocxyt behlad the :*ma c,ndl<it A lit.../ S.. /....'., -I.i. 6. f....
IN *,Wh Alch,nond. Whit/ i that cowkl *..1
¥, thi c,åe, ID,nnaklü Must ***W#*Wgml
.•*• a *elecllol duplno
Inl v«o -von If thlv vvlnt to h"**'4" h/N V•Øuëlw l-I
avoid I gub/nlte,Iil a,pown,n.nt.
D'.... Inl.. ~* .I.-l.
&*" -./.
-lty tmt>v#* v,·e o,t ciachtno or, thl ;,' ul Tkv.
- "*..MV * ....D... A.- ..I.*.
D~• --P• ~ .•-
*UNØ•-•8•,.
Crallt COUIU hlve tho bráäd,Ct I,oll þowi,t In V,g.nia, VI,oln. la 1~å, hœ •p•nt å n•i sø • d•,h
ha.dnno dvll cases *h
ØD#ms o,moi r,an $13.000 i'd ~S, Unll./ 5:.'. 0~.I, ~,
i.'#, C/..IR.! C...S, C.C.4 .0.., j.00•á 1 J,d,I 0,- '1*§..
MIW /M famà~y pnaet* .IØO L.'w// */-/ b,#ml/, a -*
D, Incjudlng dlvorc:, ~i 1//./.*
from the Glqr»1 Dtstfkt wsu êå CS,es tn•{ a'e lc)O*•' /'I'"'I' "/4- P,••1"
Court IM Zhl jvvli,1• Ind ¢C t/ V"'/ *~• 1'
00),I+ISOC R-tien: Cour!.
*W R'u 'I/Int IIO*. sucl~I thi Thl¥
I'l InMOWO * 3009 tr, Re"bllc'I
Òb IODI#Ilt Hwili~. Even 1*ov•Oh rhe §,Iidoi

Mad te Darti./ -t,*JI. •*I,IO.s
.f U~i D,ICI„ ., k) lif SUDG,10~
Ub#.
joe M,ø,I,
If orcult courl Juòoœ: can f,Iqu•r,U
y
N...'*U C).* C..'~' 2 00*
1
1 2
:tnnn """ ":n,u

PORTRAIT OF JUDGE HADDOCK
OY£2,1* 201'
Pictured are frorn left. Henry Wingate, the artisr, Judge Haddock, the
portrait. and
Judge Haddock. The portrait has been completed and been sent to New York for
framing. After being framed but before the otflclal unveiling. tho artist wiìl borrow the
portrait for an exhibition.
A àIM~~~å~W*¢~6 the Alekandrla
1#'ivsr#i##%+Mlf'itjha dinner and later at the
hüli'Michael,Patúrls,.and Jonathan Westrelch

~~~1* " bf DIM òro Ginsberg; Dlhgman Lôbowítz: Grenad,er,
- ízön>b@ìšèi-AEMËTFFAGdgins Law Firm; Leibl,ch
&
">:¿ÖRM,®dwil~rn G- Thomas fór their generous donations.
-
,
K..'U-
SUPREME COURT OF VIRGIN
.a IA
UBALC'"..L
=--RI/.. ·
Ra=aT,L*I=/
1
.¥ML-"
-
-I.
OI,C, 0, ™t FUCUI,¥E $,CREIAET

100 Nom™ N,/, I St•
tn
E,ciuo,Io. V,•o,M,A 2321P
-2334
**ná, 6'I=ll, ZO=~=
(8041 786·6455
Novcmbcr 21,2011
The Honorable Rich=d B. Potter.

Judgc
Thirrßmt Jodjclil Ciratií
Prince Willi=n CI!0*
Court
Circuit Cot=t Clmmbers

9311 Leø Avenue
M=** VA 20110
Dear Judøe Potter.
FebrumEnolos®d a de=!-d-n order authorizing you to sit in Alæcandria Cirazlt Court on Mon
y 13, 2011is You will bo presiding dMY,
Rc : Omnd Jurv Roaueât of Janice W. Orcn ovu thcrcgulmr =ssion of *e Omnd Jmy. ll,cre is one it=~s, In
adleL scheduled thsf the Judges
have rccuscd themselves *om
bcdn;
By copy of this l-r to Chi

ef Judgo Haddock and Mr. Sem
agieement to pr=ide on Pebruåt onian, I am advising hm of
y 13~. Ms. Diane Fiske, cou yoor
Plcoe contact Ms. Pialæ at rt administrator, i: available
703-7464123 to aåsist you,
Thznks agi!!n Ibr }9>t~ a=istance.
Sincerely.
.
Patricia G. Dãyis
POD:pbk
Enciomno
The Honomble Danal

d M. Haddock Chfef
Judge
Tho Honorable Edw=rd Semoni=
~ Jr., Clcrk
ML Diane FkK Court Admlnhtmk
Øuprtmt €O11rt oí Virginia
«0 Stl 0 ÎBDO= 1»tøt prtstut* *t;all €.UA#*$
RT[Okn Et, na, I, CYNrwu D. KINSER.
dib'l-å- ofth• hp. Co,•t .f Vlrglnl.. by virvoe orm.ido,Ity Yz.tod ln m. by l=-,
THI 1{ONORABU R!CHARD B. POTTa

JUDGEO'THZTHIRTT-MRSTJ[IDICIAL CIRCUIT
TO TRISIDZ IN THE CIRCUIT COURT
Op THI Crrr OP ALmANDRIA
To pr-idi gver F~IMI J=Y pr .. p

on Momdzy, kbruuy i 3, 2011
To A..[g
THEJUOGES Olf THIEIOHTEENTH JUDIC:ALCIAÇUTr

knths p,rfarmænci orthcirdutl®~
R i•,o Ordm,d. Ghem umder my hand I:~1 -=lthl 2*stday orßiov:mber 2011.
Lwf--UL
Owi..,44-*-C.i.t.fvlr~Rk
]1
.
VIRGINIA
IN TH]š CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CrrY OF AIÆXANDRIA
MO 11001482
In Re: The Matter of Janice Wòlk Orenadier
FINALORDER
UPON THE FILING

THIS MATIER CAME ON TO BE HEARD THIS DAY
"the Pctitio ner", ofthe following:
by Janice Wolk Grenadier, hereinafter referred to as
1. Petitioner' s Praecipe.
any other initial pleacling~1 XD U'Tit
The Praecipe was not accompanied by the âling of
part: "6. this eæ:uf.
The prayer for relief in the Preacipe provided only in relevant
as an elected
precipe calls oh you (the clerk ofthc couzt) to perform your
Duty
. ' : · : P.
Granä Jury before the
.,j ';'. , '1 Cpnstitutiopnl QIScèr to plaòe this Petition for Special
pctilion Éled with the praecipe,
á ··?Ž4*k,~Y. ~:~ ,~, 1~~ *~~Ï~~~Gyandlúhr.'1. Hof*ve~,lhetç wasno
irèd· in Itde.3:2 ofthe Rules of
' 7'. 'Z~ .7 :Y:' nór.1~rakthate any·8Nil' complaint fled asrequ
for judgmcnt br bill of complaint
:. ' f :.'.' 5 .· íhé S,ipremæ (p(~t; nor aá other mòtion
5, which pleading
·,· filed Jþcrein'as're*iired ih Virginìa Code Section 8.01-27
ce for the 001]It to proceed uponthe
':. · f'l · Would set forlh sufficient.mn,ter of suhtan
ion or mqucst filed under Virginia Code
, ' - ·, ? f .::.-::6'¿Ïi , merits oftho caüsèi nor:any' applicat
/,.
., · Section 8.01-644·orSection 2.2-3700.
the Commonwealth
. · · ·· ,i . , : * Petitioncr's Práecipe and Ñíotion for Sanctions against
: ·' · '. .... Attomey for the.Citÿ] of Alexandria, and
the Court
:. I ' ' ' ~ ~ ·- . >3. P©titi®er~s Praecipe and Motion for Sanctions against the Clerk of
. ' 11--. ' U
'' UPON THE FILINO OF (+ BERVICrOrrl®eIESS Ml~RE BEING

NO
ŠERV[CE OF PROCESS on any person or party defendant. and
g
ý« t · : AUPON THE APPEARANCE IN COURT , in person, this day of lhe followin
(«ihdletitioner, Janice Wolk Orenatlier and ....

(Vfthe Commonpfjlth Attorney, ;im.dçlph Sengd j
Cafüßec #J/f)4#$, /VI#*NSH~

v AAT AIW
AND UPON CONSIDERATION OF the totality of the facts presented to this
colut, incll~ing, but not limited to the following:
(1'the cxhibits presented and duly mlmitted herein / 77*¢*. ,/z~
< ~- Ge othcr evidence presented by the Petitioner ( ) no other evidence being
presented by Petìtioner
1
e being
( ) the evidence presented by the Respondent(s) (.*~ other evidenc
presßted
( *khg argument by Petitioncr
(v))!Í~gumcnt of Rcspondcnt
( VÍ !* ruling of thc Federal District Court in Casc No . 1 : 11CV1136, nnà
Attorney has not requested
( Ó thc finding by the court that thc Commonwealth
ended to the
that a grand jury be impaneled; that the grand jury has not recomm
that this coutt, On its own
court that a special grand jury be impaneled; and
provided in
motion, has not ordered that a special grand jury be impanclcd , as
Virginia Code Scction 19.2-206 , it is thcrcfore
stated in court, as
ADJUDGED, ORDERED and DECREE) for the reasons
follows:
efe»4 &,e·eoe, t.er (%0*!r

1. That, as a matter of procedural law, this causo (.+1&.b
not propcrly before this couzt
not properly filcd or noticcd and thcrcforc it is
and this cause shall bc, ømd hereby is, dismissed, and
tive, the oourt orders 83

1 That, asa matter of substantive law, and in thc alterna
to the merits of the praecipe and motions that the Praccipe and Motions filed
cäor 00-
by Janice Wolk Grenadier shall be, and the ãamc hereby are. (+Uene
dismissed, and
before tile
(a) the Pctitioner' 3 Prcacipc to have the clerk place the.petition
and thc Prcacip e is
grand jury Bhall bc, and the same hereby is, denied
dismissed, and
the
(b) the Petitioner's Praecipe and Motion for Sanctions against
Commonwealth Attorney shall bei and the samc hereby arc, denied
and are dismissed, and
the Court
(ç) the Praccipe and Motions for sanctions against the Clerk of
with
shall be, and the same hereby are, denied and dismissed
prejudice.
(d) Other:
"u -ni# e«wr 1*F*CR7~*blne *4M97Iht#U»e-

3. That the court order*hat the court reporter shall make a transcnpt oi these
proceedings and filë tñe same with lhe clerk of this court which transcript
shall then be made a part of th* record and incorporated as part ofthis order «
bv reference thereto. -l,e ,*,yz'*e•*'Sät,z**dà~ØK,7-*l«kf~- \
65
*'Y'YF>#*W'**0*
And thi3 order is final and this cause ended.
N
Entered this 13'b day of February, 2012. ~..1
VU
Juåge Richard B. Potíer
2
Seen:
Janice Wþlk Grenadig'Petitioner
Randolph Sengel, Commonwealth Attorney
.
t
br
.U .
3
.
Q
,
3
VIRGINIA:
IN THE CIRCUIT COUITT FORTHE CITY

OFALEXANDRIA
JANICE WOLK GRENADIER
Plalntift,
V.
Case No. CH010654
ILONA El.Y FREEDMAN GRENADIE
R
Aka ILONA HECKMAN,
And
GRENADIER INVESTEMENT CO..

cro et al.
And
DAVID MARK GRENADIER
Defendanta
Opposition to Ordbr by Judge Clark on Statem

ent of Facts
for September 26, 2012
Having read Judge Clarks Order - lt shows the ooüusåo

n of the Def•ndant•. the
Defendants Lawyers„ the Clrcu# Court ol Aloxancbía, other
Govomment employees and
elected omdals. Under the Rules of the Suprm
l,o Cou,t of Virginia all ovldonco evon if
R i• not •low-d h oourt 1~to~be in ü» 8#tømerá of Fads. Judge Clark accepted hto
evidenc• Infonnation suppo,~o Ptalntørs clairns Aat he on October
12. 2012. mailed
back lo Plalntlff b·, an Iflort to Intlmlda» Plalntlff. This evidenc
e ks In th• fil• that •hould
be sent to Suî=no Cou:t of Virginia. parl of Plaint
iffs Siatarnent of Facts
Judg• Clark leavee out alao what has recently come
to tho Plaintiff'o atl•ntlon th•
Colu•Ii,n b.twæ.on Judge's and Defend
ant Ilona Grenadler that they were lookin
inlormatlon on Plalntlff to declare her g
for
Incompetent to me any further Infomlatlon A
gentlomin a• a favor to'Defenda
nt Ilona was to d,ug Ptalntlfl gettin
g sexual and
Inappropriat- naked plotures of Plmlnt:M or to plant
drugs In Plaintiffs hom,& on her
girls, or to hurt Plalntm'e girls.(Plalnlltf cho'os
es not to expose what was to happen to
Plaintiff• girls In this Oppoellon) Plaintiff
has reported lo the police who In colluslon
with Cornmonwiallh Attorniy Randy
Sing,l to charge plalntiff with Extort
lon With rtc
report number or hcldent number, hform
ed Plab,tllf she ehould just Ignore lt. Plaint
chooses not to Ignore and 1« the evide iff
nce in th• wayof e-fnmi|8 and
conversation.
tape of
1 ,%
EXHIBIT # \
M' 865
03
Plaintiff can show thio is a
p* ttern of the Circuit Court of Alexan
are nôtapart of be Old dria agalnôt thoôe tha
t
Bo~1 Network - Examp
les include:
1. ' Mike Flelds - The court offic
ials known at this
time are: the Clerk óf the
Court Edward Sernonlan
Jr., the Commissioner In
Chancen, Michael Weiser,
Ihe Honorable Chief and Pre
siding Judge Lisa B.
Kemler, and qttorney Ir@
S. Saul. The proceedings
referenced by this
Petition are: CL 04-
001130. CH 04-0012
30, and CL 05-001284
-
Page 17 - Of Michael Fiel
d's - Petition for Writ of
Mandamus & Prohlbltlon
Supreme Court of Virgin to the
ia Reads :
The court officials'Improper

conduct is not limited to Mr.
relief sought in the Petition Field and the
lä of significant public Importa
example, had the court omclals nce. For
performed their mandated mln
duties ln these proceedings, the lster ial
bankruptcy of General Motors and
governrnenb subsekluent mut the
ti-billion dollar bailout of the
the -old- GMAC would *new" GM and
have been avoided.
Instead Mr. Field and his coun
sel have been obstructed from
seeking
relief and denied access to
the records at the arcult Cou
rt forthe City of
Alexandria by threat:s of phy
sical harm and the unethical
behavior
evidenced In this Petition.
: ~š-js~~]{*~24~Síf]-uc :; ~
T• Ih• best or my rieo
C.urtbe=.< iner æ beag
aœe:tea. I rem,inbrr
tæl om thi CMAC CaM
s:,ndtog æg~øid, th.
- -
Ai....drlm City
when Art came etll,tat
41
ie
~,4/.
ahakco attd st#ed nul loot:ng Wlb}y
J•• Mnya hœd told Art
Oa[ ) A,l coolht••d t•
th• lawlån tt WOU[d be pertoæ pr•ss ciahzu agaloål
threætœæod Art Whe aay dangero,• ror ArLAr[,p~ctñ ~~
n I s•ggeæl.d tbal ws caüy {hæt Joæ M•ys bmd u.-•
rct:rn hi,lde to teœ the
detllned to dn :o. Ï asked Jt~dgt orponce, Art
him,c¥trmt ¢*nes ss lo
3*atrd :hat Joe Msys bad ex:ctty whit jioe Msys
had åztd. •nd Art
threntad Art *6 p.no 4, ti
mal Lmrm lfArt brooghi
the attor,c,i læ the ea,e. Uælmt mgælmt *
Erhlbh 1 - Exhjblt
adrnmld into evidencg,
over Mr. Field 's objo
cuonl privileged com c:Ion thet it conlaine
munlc®ona, by com d attorney·
missioner m Çhanoe
reporl and thi cert ryWe!3er howeve
lfiod record r omitted from his
EXH[OIT #
64
Counsel for thi Bake~ Ptalntjfl's,
Ira S. Saul, was su•pended irom
law In Virginia and M+Yland the pmclige ol
for many years alter being
convicted ol four counts
of bank fraud - -crlmiòal acts
reflecting adversaly on hla hon
osty, tru¥tworlhlnooe,
or tltneao aa a lawyerlln othor recp
oel•.,9,..Abiu~„Y Or#øvano• Gomm
Ma,yland v. /ra Staphbn Sau loa/Orl Of
/.
2. John Arundei
-Iit rk-4't 01 -,y
c•.„i.r than that.-
Perhaps k does.
In a second hoctll~ t=Iœow of

The Almndrka TIY/ h 2000'
K A,1,1:Jr.and Denlll mullmmonmlro new 0*-rs John
and WIN D,mb=wl,* aecu
aüocatlno $10,000 p•r month In .id by,h.pipir's lotndir
'coniuläng fees and w-ownorof
Jaokion Holœ, Wyoînlng (whiri »,i to lhe Arlarl at:ornœy Davi
Arlal, vacation and own a ranch), v•Hho d Bick•tt of
krv•bdg• ol tho Pubå•h~r. A iure» ut thi cons•nt or
r complaIN v:u that thi now own•,s
booldcei:», wlfh Ih•lru. M,«yn t,„ix had replaced hk
. vh, cougt rioo,ds indicali did pri,on
Wglnlå for emb•zzl- nanL G•a•* tlmæ in W•st
•SI .1<*æ •, The Noxancrla Times and ts Wed on Ibs
= ACOO,mtanL web cHo
Cônlmnt*d wah tho clalrr-. thi Artaøa

kxk•d *- 1~net,our-,nd Pubü•h•r
nivmpæp,rol! ~ al 1108*ue, PRI SV« out ol N
(abuœdbW liœ A,*I ownbd had
ë. . mdo la Publ•h•r
I. . ' .. )
0./'//.'*) "/.%t. Bick•b-,d AW hb,d Craig
. vlythi#*=F,io„al)#Na dog,
La,Ieto es a» niwpubüshef, bl
dlm~aed hlm~ pæoer *w Lanoto was
ki A~na mo,nk; *u bebg confk
wd•r l p•Iudon 3/11 and r~,d w~ sci„lilll,U anides
IE:Irnpmno to bm thi Tl,n,e
for thorn.
A cub*iquent Pubâshlr. &1•n
Dlntllson. waå also bckid out
o, th* papir m y•ar lat•,. and
A:soc» Pü*lhlr Jeonfi Thilln Ms
wm resigned k, prola.
pmpirk,baok piy. Thi ci„I L Ajoirai,d,ia ooun documonts show
U~t Th irnann hi,I i&aid *-
Dio-bor. oois te A,I„i„d,la CI,cuR Coint
In
Colnoldinti#. lhe oeae alaln# tho Ailmt~a

wher, Dolwtl M. Hs,ddock Sr li nd txnb- wil bo h~ard tn thi si,uni couitho
mi P:æikl~0 CI=A CouR Jdp ui.
Jr. 6 a Clro,A Cou,t Judge. P(lr .d ß„-§ R:. Hfdo©
ysare, MI ligal Ir-Ists cf thl Artal ~
byDon•ld M. Haddooh Sr. and tam»y. wori repro~ntid
Donmld M. Haddoel4 Jr. whll~
thq wer,ln prlvati pmctlce.
Whle both anor--
.Ai"d..#.* 4TCSZZ2%~'&*
©onltlc! ef &*'/"L oourt r~corch; h,d~csts that Judo'~tr.:/y:di:it:i,ix~iA#Ztjf'i'ÜÜii~n
C)0'Ild M. H.dooolc Jr. ia•t y'*r rut'd In
lavor af a roullitle Court riqui•t
Jr. who b nc,v d,co/9 by Alu Tbnas LLC, ownsd by hli
fomwir d•nl John M- Arl•Il,
,•d.
in anoltwr Ilrlncl tvh

t. aft•r I -k..vßz baltl~d
for wam wllh thi oon
niw• paperh © iervo~I Wa,hinoton
ou,1 Tlrni•
voa,A!•*and,Im Tl,ovor ownir:hlp ol ,• Conneclion Nsvæpapiræ and unpdd p,Indng
r- Uanaglng Dlr.ctor Din bms. lut
lsl Dunbærhlrad Patrici
P'*giher. V. Cvllloan as hs n•w
Dunbar told frlends that

she wanted e- paper to
havo a more 'conservallvi
voicæ' and Bald the
8 wih Thi Wiåhir*n Tkn
is, o,nid by Ihe Unn*o
n Church, a
~~~~~~~~~!
maaa weddhl Tknes Ptïb Dy Korean r•Uolous kd®, Bun Uyui,g Uoon and bi•t
ahar Patrlc~ á,Illgan le known lor b
Marlt~tino and FI„v„nu ü,e w!1, ol Tom C:Illtoan.
, o,164~a' Ths Waihlng the Chld
ton Times.
EXHIBIT #
65
1
Låbovtn eåål wa• bi,~lgat,d by Aas~tari U.8 Aaomey for the E=te,n Dl,Ulct ot
Wgkù• Tim B•1•¥•tz, Is~wiåasbythœ IRS.Crknlnal hv-tioatlcn DM•Ion mrü Justl-
D,oœrbnœnræ Tsx Dlv~o,) Trial A:tmeyCaryn Fhl~y.
Wih John Arlalr, pasælng' last Pibruury, hl~ ownorshlp Irrtorout of Alo:c Tlmoæ LLC has nOW
~
r-"" Io lhl 'A,lal P•mãy. Or-ollhi Adæl fam,ym„r~swho ov,rm thl Alalca,1*a ™es
ID Il,n,v• kl<in kllelait Un~*d 8~~ A#om~. R,IU,Ilid St~H A„of,w, ~ Olñci
Inv=lg-d the cmmagakn kllovtz. -p•r i,tict• From Looal Kjoks- 8•pliinbœr~.2011
-*-Ja-Ndoi.Ao . mkyi#*-Fper-tlo,49="n•- paclæt-
Deter·Iabovltz·rlóed-tot,Íson·
& MS. De,Anne R. Upson ·Case No. 10-CV-360 - The. ar• many oth•r vlcürn• b•cause
' .... „. .. '.. d
clf. Thiymumt ~v;be,In ge~no I,N,g wm tí,•corruoüon for a væ,v long lima.
My,-ral çm * 10-CV-380 In DC Federal Olsttlc: Court and l, Up.,.nv. DC •t 21
Haddcok suaspon:o.aled my c:u,lody r:,- and t'*u•d a capias lor my arroal Íor nlusíng to show up to
: Show C=• h-N for *Nch ha had -1-olu:ely no lurtrnr-"on. No one bi thi cas• lv•• ir, VAI The
aaptma c.in'I bœ enlorc~d outik~i ef VA
Bla»d Nl Oasœ No. 10-CV·360
In thc ñrrth= h„1po of lhe ends ofjuøtice. Mother Fys thit Court consider lo mî,ns
on this Motion for Rein*1*Íernant that this Child is the rcsalt of internet Eextlal predation
and rmpe by the biological father who is a $50 mlîllon oct worth wel!<onncctcd
Washingt~a DC 1105~*4 law ,er who evö- Indlcateø b,ibod DC, VA. and MDjudges
and ofñeiali to achieve tbls now coming 6 year kidnapping and conccalmcot through
impïopcr forum shoppiAg back and forth acrou Lhe Potomåc River through briblng
judøes to hear c=es with promises of political favon lododjng as:ict=nce with
Iccommcndailons Tor hl,her court appointment. Evldcncc wu prt:eatcd to tho state
courts and ofmcials of th• biolo:'--1 fsthor'• --~n ~nd prnctlcc of forum ahopplnz and
fraud upon the courts and crindml activity, but that cvidcn.. wu colnplctoly ignored
m:Ulting 113 I arilking tack orcmpathy for this Mother and Child who ore victlmz ofhis
internet zexunl prødation and rape. clearly extrcmc animoslty, and harmed by Mother's
rcftšal to be coerced into åboninz dìs Child by William Eærl Wallace III-
Judge Clark furiher does not go Into the fact that h• had recused himself by all
appearance * this case on I
1. January 25,2012 nol hoarlno a Motion - fïl•d appropriately with the Cîe,lts office
4
EXHIBIT "Ill,¿1.
00
2. February 8, 201
2 not hearing a Motion
fllod appropriately wIt
h the Clerl¢S ofliCe
3 . May 14 . 2012 Jud
ge Clark received a
letter from Plalntjf! he wou
ld be Included Ìn
a suit for 18 colludon In
lhe blocking ol Plalntl!1
gevlng a fair trial.
September 28,2012 amo
unted to no more than
Kangaroo Court with Jud
br•aking hl, Oalh of ge Cia,lc
omci 4 not recuslhg
hlrnset
Plalntltf here lays out

the pdom cf Clmull Cou
rt of Alexandrla. their coll
actions agains uslon ar~
t Platnttff ar• wtlltul wit
h maßcloua, violent, opp
ressive, fraudulent, wan
and groesly recldess thre ton
ats - to twist the law to
abuse the Power thgy
puttíng ort the robe and pogso•s by
entorlng the Court eac
h day.
Plalntlff oblects lo the

~Ordet by Judge Clark
who by his past 'Ô,der
Trustee type sltuatlon by r haa created a
Orli•:ing Plabtm cenno<
and the value of the fib any*áng without his
case w*h he iß aw permission,
are of.
Judge Kemler. Judgo
Dawkln• &.ktdgi Clark
documonrasubmltted by their order and by retu
ktto court on S•pt•mb•r rning the
have commnted Tre 26, 2012 and past Treaso
ason on the Court n on the Court
Raipecttully subn:1*tod
on Doco,nber 17,2012
for Judge Clark's per
filed. A basic right of mission to be
Amerlean Cltlzins - Due
States Con*lltution Proc-* - stated In th•
tn any other Couft. unit•d
December 17,2012
~~nd~J~---
pro G./ J
15 W•«**,g Str=1
.Imnn-n.",I.-, - Ale=nt!% Vugwa 22301
703-63&0658
1!OE>aes.,178
Ooournents have b•i CI,Uflo- ol S,I,v[E» Ub
n deüvered 10 Judgeo
Chømber, on Decemb
eæ em'!M' for h Oid•,K er 17.2012 tor Judge
Copi. havi D,iim *41, Clærk's approval
netily ml, p-tre that a»id to Oelind~ntæ hwy
Ordir t- bionmed and v,l ors - Judge Jœrn~i Clar
T-etc, P~*,tilr, *** n-- havi 1 #Ied -nped k shani
D~uro at O:N u/oG~ - 8"""e~~ and sert to al Pa ,tlas lrrv
=C 4"n=* A,~1=son olred 25
110, 1(]49 St~st. Sun , Stan io,. Dui.Uüulw PC lo
Mtcrael J. W*er. 810 i 810, AI=andrla~ VA B••,
King St. SuRI 416, Aha 22314 & David Grenad
inæla, VA 22314. ierlo
December 17,2012
Jante Wolk r 1~, kj&6
L-
~ }W-4
V s
-
Ejü{!Brr *.. ,,
d
67
VIRGINIA: i
IN ITHE CIRCUIT CO
URT FOR THE CI
.t
TY OF ALEXANDR
4
.ANICE WOLK GR IA
ENADIER
Plaintiff,
V.
Case No. CH010654

ILONA ELY FR
EEDMAN GRE
NADIER
et al,
And --
GRENADIER INVE FILED I

STEMENT CO., LT
D et al, Nov.20 zo/L %
And
Clerk oí Cor
i
DAVID MARK GR City*»d,I, Va. i
ENADIER
1
Defendant
DEPUTY C'LEAK - '
-
Statement of Fact
s For Hearing on
City of Alexandr September 26, 20
ia Filed to perfe 12 in the Circuit
ct Order by Judg Court of the
e Clark on Octob
approving Plai er 12, 2012
ntiff's Ap peal Notice
~OMES NOW JA
NICE WOLK GR
ENADIER, PLAI
Orders by Judge NTIFF files State
Clark - who had ment of Facts fro
having had re recused himself m the illegal
ceived in May fro m hearing Plaintiff
of 2012 a letter 's Motions In the
stating he would past -
Plaintiff. that his be party to legal
actions on Septe ac tio
her day in court mb er 26, 2012 were n against him by
according to Brod with prejudice an
y v. Connecticut. d that Plaintiff ha
and Cronyism no That the Judges s still not had
t the Law and the have been ruling
Rules of the Su on Favoritism
preme Court.
On September 26
, 2012 the followi
to the Judge and ng picture show
copies to the Defen s the Notebook of
when asked by dant's attorneys evidence that wa
Judge Clark. Ju with no Objections s summited
dge Clark allow by Defendants att
record ed all evidence orney's
In the Notebook
to be put into the
ZR
.j
d
\1
1
On around October 11, 2012 Plaintiff
went to the Clerks in the City of Alex
-çonfirm Plaintiff's file was in Order. andria óffice to
Plaintiff found the Exhibits that the Judg
A,here not in the file. When Plaintiff ques e had ordered Into record
tioned ìt - Judge's Chambers informed
about 45 minlutes that Judge Clar the Clerks office after
k was on the bench Plaintiff wou
went to the 4'h floor to find tha ld nee d to come back. Plaintiff
t was a lie. A clerk from Jud
ge's Chamber came down claim
had been in court on Septem ing she
ber 26, 2012 and
1. The Judge never had them

on the bench - which is unture
how would the Judge have them
they hadn't been on the ben if
ch and he hadn't received them
2. They were never put into evid in court?
ence - Judge Clark very clearly aske
they had objections and niether atto d Defendant's lawyers íf
rney nor defendant whom is a lawy
room had an issue with them bein er and was in the court
g entered on the record .
3. Then ìt was Plaintìff could
check the transcripts and they
would say that they were never
entered into the record ( which
means to Plaintiff the transcripts
4. Prior to leaving the court hou have been tampered with)
se Sheriff Kapetanis of the Alexand
Plaintiff back into the Court house ria Sheriff's office escorted
where Plaintiff requested the note
Defendant's lawyers if they didn book's back from
't wish to have them - They both
Plaintiff they needed them as they in agreement informed
had been entered into the record as
walked away agreeing with evidence. Plaintiff
them.
The Clerk from Judge's chambe

rs then gave Plaintiff the cholce
or they would be destroyed of taking Plalntiffs Exhibits
-
-,0*/0"" A'- 4.'./ i-LJ. 1--*'"-/--

I",
vl
2
On October 13,2012
in the Mail Plaintiff rec
-,pened from the eived the following Bo
Circuit Court of Al x which has not been
exandria
rcö
On October 11 2012
, Plaintiff wrote
Jury to lookinto a letter to Chief Ju
the Illegal beha dge Lisa Kemler req
vior and irrespo uesting a special Gra
fmmlted into co nsible way the co nd
urt - The fraud on urt handled the
-šponse to the requ the co urt since Septemb do cu me nts
est the foliowins or er 5 , 2007 . Plaint
çlçr - r latntìfí was iff was served in
Court house on
or around Octobe served this Order as
r 16, 2012 she walked into the
3
VIRG]NIA:
rN THE CIRCUIT CO
URT FOR THE CITY
OF ALEXANDRIA
JANICE WOLK
GRENADÌER
Plaintiff,
V.
CASE NO . CH010654
GRENADIER INVE
STMENT CO.. LT
Defendants. D. ot cL
OB--Ež
Finding that all
mancfs pending before
this Court pertaining to
the matter Janlce Wo ,
Grenadier v. Grenad
j,r Investment Co .,
LTD, et aL , Case No
. CH010654 , have bee
n conclut j
and that Plaintiff, Jan
ice Wolk Grenadicr,
has filed a Notice of
Appeal from the Ord
cr cnten
September 26. 20 l 1
denying Plaintiffs Mo
tion /o Reopen Cosc-
Due fo- Fraud on fhe
Cow y
Deßndanu, Change
of Venue, 7>Ml by Jw
y, Additional De/,n
dan,; it is
ORDERED that Jan
ice Wolk Grenadier
be, and hereby is, pro
hibited from submitti
ol ny
further plcadings,lette
rs or other communic
ations that relate in any
way to the macter, Jan
tcø P ilk
Grenudle , v. Grenad
ier Investmønt Co.,
LlD, et aL , Case No
. CH010654, either in
per304 4
letter, by telephone
or electronic comm
unication. to the Cim
uit Couzt for the Ci
-:t! A.rtho ty of Alexandz i
r ordcr orth]3 Co
urt; and it is
FURTHER ORDE
RED that the Sheri
ff shall forthwith ser
ve acopyofthis Or
.>
der on Jal ce
Wolk Grenadier at
15 W. Spring Str
eet. Alexandria, VA
22301.
Pagc 1 of2, Or
der dated Octo
ber I k 2012
ik-
-h
4
ENTERED this --~-~.~da
y of October, 20
12
-*71 C{,tl-¢(/~
Judge Lisa.Kcm
ïcr
/72*.* ß. 136-4i-iL-
7uðie'NŠIEB.awxlnã
-
Uðãâlãnx,-/ZYTIJR,ir-----------
.- . A lopy 'fcjt:-
túv.,ard S®Eo
rie=. Clefi
»1 1*:.. ./
,- ; - . f -·- #V t ICT"
Page 2 of Z Ordc
r entered Octobc
r t k 2012
%=*
3
'~hese two examples sin
ce September ŽB, 2012 sho
keep the truth from being ws the extremes the Judges
head since Septombor O, are going tg
ZOOT. That Plalntifrs fundâm
Process the bâsic Freedóms that entâl right to Due
our country stands for. The rlgh
Lawyers, Judge's, Judicia t to due process without Fraud from
l, Elected offlclab is a pdm
ary component of Freedo
Trial - Due Process is the m. The rightto a Fair
basic Constltution right tha
that our Country has given t has bee n the source of the light of
the World. This basic Ube freedom
rty is what our flag stand
for and here is where
the standard of Liberty Is set for the rest
Partnership where one partne of tile World. This case Started out as
a Real Estate
r took advantage of anothe
showed how little Integrity r partner - that partner defend
she has from how she sto ant Ilona
on several occasions, etc le from the Sonla Grenadler
. etc. But, it is deeply sad Tru st - not once but
deprlvatlon of basic freedom denlng now to see how har
s, deprivation of constitution sh the effe cts of
human rights are to Plainti al rights are to Plaintiffs freedom
ffs freedom, and basic
On Wednesday September
26, 2012 In the City of Alexan
presiding, Judge Clark did dria Circuit Court room with
a roll call to see who was Judge Clark
was full. When Grenadler the re and how long they would
v. Grenadler was called Def take. The docket
informed Judge she was endants attorney's asked to
ready to go. As has bee go last - Plaintiff
n the situation since Sep
favorite the decision of the tember 5,2007 the Judge
Defendants -Which from
the past the Defendants and what took place in court by
the Judge had planned how all appearance as in
situation - through Favorttism he would rule and how he wou
and Cronyism and not the Law ld handle the
Showing the Basic Freedo or the Rules of the Supreme
m of Due Process had no Court.
Afit time so defendants cou place In his court room. Tak
ld go last in a locked down ing 3 % hou rs of
Js to pay Defendants attorne court room - then Judge Cla
ys for that time. It is stated rk rule d Plaintiff
well the Judges and lawyer In the City of Alexandria Bar
s work together. From all Magazine how
boating, once or twice a mo the pictures Ìn the magazine
nth together - how many live of them, dining,
When you have the Power tha s of Victims are decided at thes
t these Judges have over our e parties?
parties or by If you are par being - to have the decisions
t of the Old Boy Network made at
was made let's fix it: instea is dlsgusting. Many times
d they went to another Par Pla inti ff said a mistake
and her girl's lives. ty and thought how we can
further ruin Plaintiff
After all other's had been hea

rd and several did go past the
to litigants . The only litigant 30 minutes with the Judge bein
Judge Clark was rude to - g patient J
besides Plaintiff was anothe
r Pro se litigant.
After everyone had left and
Grenadier v. Grenad
the Court Room to make ler was heard - the Sheriffs we
sure that no one was allo re standing outside
wed In to watch the procee '~,
dings.
On the Plaintiff side you
had pro se Janice Wolk
Grenadier
On the Defendants side
you had John Tran
Michael Wieser for David for Ilona Ely Freedman .
Grenadier . (Defendan Grenadler Heckman et
t Ilona attorney was a Baìt and al, and
and Hillary were Involved switch as Ben DIMuro
in the Fraud on the
Court in the filing wlth the
Supreme Court of Virginia)
Plaintiff started out wi ~
th asking that Judge
Clark recuse himself for the fol
lowing reasons :
1 . Refusing to hear
2 Motions filed by Pl
*., 2. The letter deliv aintiff
ered In May that Plaint
because by all appeara iff planed on naming him
nce Plaintiff in a suit she plans to file
Judges to rule In Defen believe him to be in
dant's favor. Becaus Collusion With the
other Circuit Coult
e she is part of their
elite Old Boys Network
group.
6
VIRGINIA:
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF PRINCE WILLZAM COUNTY
ALAN C . LIDDET . T ., ET AL .
PLA Z NTT,T S
VS. CHANCERY NO. 30*11
ILONA ELY GRENADIER, ET AL.
DEFENDANTS
ILONA ELY GRENADIZR , onca of the Dcfendants ln the
above - styled CHANCERY MO . 30211 , ig a member of the local
Bar who. regularly practicgs law befora thl= Court.
Tharafora, the Judges of the Thlrty-First Judicial Circuit
deem .Lt improper for any one or them to preside in this
case, and the Chief Juatice of the Supreme court is

reque=t-d to de-igna.te another clreuit court juclge to
preside ever this case.
ENTERED thie rSL;_-day of

A ~t ß 1. ØG~
>ZL~,e-.457}0[*;3~
FERÖ-Ÿ- 'THOEÚ##-QF-r-5R., JUC,GE ~6
.«A=*C
M. SELWYN SMITH , JWRP# 0'
Id*A. ~UArZŽ*
, --+1/_-»-lt-*56•L. ezz>CÍ --
-*FAANK A. HOSS, JR., JU DG~W ·
l
* WILZ.ZAM D. »"l~AMBLEN, JUDGE
..
BKÜI SSPGO34 l
'~ ·
"t{'}*f
=
*
«. '.5"itk.7.
V iK Ul NIA:
IN THE CIRCUÏT COURT OF PRINCE WILLIAM COUNTY
JOSEPH RICHARD PERRY . JR . )
v. ) CL No. 14-8136. 07023762

)
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA )
FINAL ORDER
These cases came on Petition for Reinstatement filed by Petitioner,
And the Court having treated the Petition as an independcnl action under 8 . 01 -428
D filed by Petitioncr to vacate an Order o f Declaration entered by this court June 12.
1990. in Caseno. Law 23762, carried in this Court's scanned files as 07023762-00.
And it appearing that ihc Pctitioncr has previously litigated and had dccìdcd
againsl him thc i3311¢ ofthis Couñ's jurisdiction over him personally in case no 23762,
but has not previously had decided againsl him thc qucstion hc now presents, which is
whether the Judge who purportedly entered the order in question actually did 50,
And it appearing from affidavit ofsuch judge that therc is substantial doubt that
such judge entered the order in question, and that the Commonwealth does not oppose the
entry of this order, it is found and ORDERED as follows :
1. Notwithstanding the appearance in thc Court's file or art order apparently

signed by ajudge, no such order has been in fact been entered , and the matter
remains pending and unadjudicated, and the purported order is not in effect
2. The information filed by the Commonwealth, as well as Case no. 23762, is

DISMISSED without prejudice.
3. As a result of the foregoing, the Petitioner is not an habitual ofTender under

the order referenced above, and his privilege to operate a motor vehicle in the
Commonwealth of Virginia is fully reinstated, subject (o any requirements not
relating to the declaration as an habitual offender under the order referenced
above.
Thc Clcrk shall furnish a copy ofthis Order to the Fetitioner and to
the
Commonwealth.
--,/3 l-
ENTERED this / day of / 1
A,£>it, . 2~. /
CRAIG ÚÜØÍ{ÑSTON, JUDGE
l 8:*Xor this: , ~
\4§
en and *Ãrpedjj43~7~*.-
~äcph láchard Pérry, Jr.

Astishnt Commonweahh's Attorney
A COPY TESTE:
CLERK CIRCUrr COURT
The Faces of the Murdered / Suicide and Survivor's
of the Old Boys Network in Northern Virginia
The Many Victims of 'No Pictures

of
-- Michael Gardner
John Doe
The Young Girls
And
Molested who
im Bm. m:
Chrls Mackniy *Janlei Wolk Gr•nadl•r *Ruth Ann Lodato
*
Stood Up
After having a Hit Man
Dr. Robert Rixs
RIP
Hired to t•k• thom out ~Murder for Hire
*Ron Kirby *Nancy Dunnlng 'Megan Owen Barry
Suicide Survivor Murder for Hire Suicide Survivors Murder for Hlre
Still Figá,tinã & Needs HELP
Murder for Hire and Questionable Suicide's in

the City of Alexandria and Northern Virginia
This puts together several known facts - through the life

of Janice Wolk Grenadier and different News articles and
facts from *Burned to Deaüú the Chris Mackney story, EdMed book
and Published by FamllyCourl.corn, INC attorney Michelle
McDonald, written by: Mike Volpe. That the obvious Is
being covered up by the FBI, the Judiciary, the Government
Officials who are using there personal -POWER and FINANC and Elected
IAL POWER' to Illuminate those that they find annoylng or
may get In their way through Murder for Hire or Questio whom
nable Sulcldes, Illegal Jaltlng that when put together It shows
and practice of the "Old Boy, Network" In a pattern
the State of Virginia.
Pete Scamardo in 1968 hired a hit mart Charles Harrelso

n to kill his child hood friend Sam Delegia Jr, which brings
the question was the Idea of how to get
rid of your spouse / or other brought to the Old Boys Network
Sc@mardo as the hlts known begaln In In the 70' s by Pete
or around 1984 with Dr. Rlxsey. That
by the 1990 ' s in two Commercial / Land
Development Association known Nation
wide with headquarters In the City of Alexandria Pete
Chairman on lhe boards as an active citizen - hiding Scamardo was President,
his true Idenity and past criminal history from the locals.
unravel, to be exposed through the divorce of his This started to
daughter to Chris Mackney who would take his
own life In December of
2013 from the bullylng of Pete Scamardo, his attorney
s whom he paid handsomly and Judge Bellows who
Charles Severance. That Judge Bellows by all appera today is the Judge for
nce In the news and record has dlsallowed any negativ
truth on the spouses / third parties or Issues e Information or
the victims may have been having with others prior to opening
the City of Alexandrla and being MURDER their front doors in
ED.
That where Janice Wolle Grenadler live's In a circle around

Janice Ihler have been 5 known Murder type hits - Dr. Rixsey,
John Doe, Nancy Dunnlng ( which you will read came
to Janice's home twice to check on Janice, now believe
more and was from what Nancy said afraid of what could d Nancy knew
happen and maybe knew what was going to happen to
and Ruth Ann Lodato. That all five have strong her) Ron Kirby
connecüons to the Old Boys Network.
July 1. 1984 Who shot Dr. Robert Rlxsg / Murdered

for opening his front door. We know who hired the
his x-wife. But what Is the evidence of who shot him? killer -the boyfriend of
Did the bullets that killed Dr. Rlxse In 1984 match the
Dunnlng and others? Where they tested7 The story bullets of Nancy
the pollce released was the murderer with no eviden
In the Potornac d•ad whom h•d Mafia
tlos. Ëaey for tho City of Alexandria
ce was a man floaäng
police end the FBI as they consider
solved. this murder
We then have unknown date and name

of John Doe Murdered for opening his front door
connected to the Old Boys Nehwork and Murd Ìn the City of Alexandria, also t
ered, whom has received no real press that
can be found.
Then on or around September 34 of 1997
that on an unexpected cab ride to the airpor
Grenadler (son of the late Judge Albert Gren t as Janice's x-husband David Yt
adler and step-son of Divorce Lawyer ilona
Greanadier Anderson Starace Duffett and Ely Freedman Grenadler Heckr'nan of
Kleser) as he was suppose to take Janice to the
outside waitlng and not In her home . airport and was late, Janice was 4
Janice 's x-hsuband as Janice had called him
her and saying a cab was on the way. to find out where he was - started yelling at ·
Janice can persume now his disappoint
have Janice killed has come back to ment the money It appears he and Ilona
haunt them . When Janice got In the spent lo -
Janice hang up the phone, hang up cab and the driver could hear David yelling he
the phone If you don't hang up the said to '.
up the phone , the driver than said we phonel will pull overand hang It up
can take care of that for $ 5 , 000. 00 for you. Janic e hung
Janice was handed a phone num - you don 't have It - then $2, 000 we can
ber , Janice tossed ìt In the trash work ìt out. \
out question It was to be a hit can thinking It had been a set up - Janic
and today she was to be dea e now believes with
or the FBI even though she has reac d . Janice has never been questione
hed out several times with her Infor d by the City of Alexandria Police
Sherllff Lawhorcno (who hod hert mation.through Commonwealth Attor
ourturec ln jail)That ín February ney Brian Porter &
/ Marçh of 1980 Nancy Dunnlng
who wowld open hor front
1
door In 2003 came to Janice on different occations to check on her safty . The question know arrlses was she aware of the
iutcorne that was meant for Janice In September of 1997 .
Vovember 1997 That Lawyer Ilona in colluslon with David Grenadler, Andrea Grenadler, Robin Grenadler passed a rumor
iround that caused David Grenadler to pull a gun In the home with Janice's girls In the home.
February 2003 the Suicide of Megan Owen Barry wife of Fairfax County Sheriff Stan G. Barry - The Washington Post
- eported that at 12 : 30 am Sheriff Barry had stepped out and when he came back his wife had committed suicide . The Blue
Wall
Älls this a Murder, but of course no Investigation.
December 2003 the Murder of Nancy Dunnlng wife of City of Alexandria Sheriff James Dunnlng - never questioned -oops"
say the Police when Dunnlng dies in South Carolina a few days after Janice
Wolk Grenadier on the radio questions the
nvestlgation or lack of investigation into the Murder.
March of 2011 - City of Alexandria police, Fire and Arnbulance come to the home of Janice Wolk Grenadler while she Is on
travel - she Is supposedly " DEAD " In the home
? There Is no record of this In the City of Alexandrta. Two neighbors have
-ontírmed this wlth Janice and the one who convinced the police to not hack down
her door but to allow him to open it with the
key he had. It Was not till June of 2011 when Janice's neighbor shared this with her she became aware of IL When
researched
thler Is no record yet two other neighbors have conflrrned this.
December 2011 / February 2012 - Deliberate tamoerlna with knowledaeable Intend of the Grand Jun, by Judge Potter and
Commonwealth Attorney Randy Sengel
October 2012 - Janice's documents submitted Into the record , when she went to check that they had been filed - she Is told to
take them or they would throw them out, Janice refused to take them and then they are mailed back to her by Judge's Kemler,
Dawkins and Clark. The box about 4' thick has been x-rayed and shows the documents but, never opened still In the box
rr.//.'.
*Uil-*'6/'/'.
December / January time frame of 2012 & 2013 Lawyer Ilona in collusion with others
as a favor or
hired a gentleman that goes by the name of Mark Stuart who informs Janice he was to drua Janice
and get sexual
inaooroorlate Dlctures of Janice. or to rac>e one of Janice's dauahters, or to plant druas on Janice's dauahter
or in the
home to aive Circuit Court Judge's Kemler, Dawkins and Clark. Information to make JWG
Íncomoetent to file any
other documents. Mr. Stuart said the Lawyer Ilona will go to any length to harm Janice or Janice's
daughters. That
Lawyer ilona will continue to do what she can to dlstract Janice from becoming successful and moving
on with
Janice's life. That Lawyer Ilona is a "Greedy Jew" that all Lawyer Ilona's actions are
deliberate to cause harm to
Janice. When the Alexandria Police were called they Informed Janice they
were Instructed by
Commonwialth Attorney Randy Sengel to not
take any reports of Issue.
November of 2013 the Murder of Ron Kirby - Opening his front

door - Shot and Murdered. r..
December of 2013 - Ilona Grenadier Heckman and Presidential Candidat

e Loretta Lax Miller cio a 'HATE OF
CATHOLICS, CHRISTIONS et ar Blog - jwgrenadlerlsalair.
.P-" I
blogspot. com taken down while Janice is ìn jail. tC
Two. 0-0 24, 2013 .t 2:06 PM
~
vv=nt to h-=r sorn-thlng mor-
sc=rler l contacted ~Iona Ely ,-4:
Fr--drnan Gr-nadler Hec *
krnan your vvltch hunt Is Ove
r
Pi .in : Le - I ,L ,• x / 234 •,y ' s, oå .: onn ..k
r,Cro: Jvvsrenndlir<~psrr,mll.oo,n Tue. Dec I.
24 . 2013
.
vou wnew v-**R YOU o,ON-r HIL= -=
Javvs YOU ARe THE
KINO THAT VVOULD TURN
VHI~IN ,-CAUOI ON,
PSMSDN DIO SOMH-r)4;NO
TO YOU 7-HAT V#*AS JGVV:IH
. vou MAOG VOUPI DGQAN
L,SO IN CIZLTH,e PAMLY MCJSC- O YOU
r=DYOU ,©R NC)-r æi,NO J=VVI-H, ~
YOU YT-UfIC} OOY. YOU VVER
F
E
R
~
us., SI-AMING ALL JSVVS LJKE W- ITO-,-- ANO C,FMCAOINO
I HITLER FOR NOT LIVING ON EAS
~- Y
r~~~r. VVIL-L OITC»/P V<DUM AIL OOOD
VOU LC>-TAL-L VOLJR MC>N-Y MAKIO VOL:
MVMIL- ANO OOC»0
eaEŽSFSEF-EŽZÝE~DEB:~7RSEM**SR522
z,--.. u. -o .o-r
HAv= 2'e: H.= sex Wr™ A MeNT
ALLY SICK PIECE OF CRAP
-~~06*3 EŠR:eYEF:
YOU ARK THG NA UKE YOU.
ZI VVORSE A MUSLIN
YOLJRSSLP -T,4*-r IS %.~*·•rv' VOU HA-r~ J-vve ¥f=~L-A AM- ILC>
LOVING NAZI! YOU HATF
CKSC) ~ -
2
February 18, 2014 - FBI caut
ions residents ofpublic corru
ption tn Va. -
htto://www.wusc;9.com/storv/news/local/2014/OZ/18/
fbi-coutions-resldents-of-public-corruption-in-norther
n-
viralnio/5585877/ WÅSHINGTON OVUSA) - The Federal Bureau of Imestiga
tion'$ (FBI) Washington Field Oljlc:is Iooktnt to ldentlfy
publtc corruptlon occurring in Northern any
Virginia. The FB ! says public corruptton
can occur "when a public
state orfederal - does any omcia!, at any Iml ofgmernment - local,
omcial act tn exchange jor money, or other free goods or senices
employees w}!o taki:onwthingofvalu, forfhet . for prìvate gaîr Public corruption couldalso include
r own personat gain, publìc
thereby viotatini the public's fruit." The
public corruptton start once they receive FBI aayi manyoftheirlrrvc3:tgationã tnto
a tip from someone. Ifyou want to help
Norîhern Virginia Public Corruption identtfy poten:tal criminal acttvity, thi
Wa:hln:ton Field Oßce has set up a
Hotline ot 703486-6225 and you can also ø-mail them at NQVA
Some ofthe uamplzs ofcorniptlon includ PC@jc-fhi-*m~.
e:
• Government oßlcials such a: DMV
employees, city inspectorj, taxlngor
zontrtg assessor: or other regulatory
agency employees, oreven town
• Contracttni omcicls at all levels. including

thosø,•ho manage government controcn or
manage school accounts: regulalory permlt:; or. xhool rcource Oíßcers
who
• Local omciat: colludingwith real e: tate
tnvestor: torit the btddln: process atfore
closuri auctions.
, A nersoi, rev,esenllng the iudicîrtl branch . a
ludge, member ofthe lurv or court Dcrsonnel:
• A per:on rtpre,•nttns law enforcement. wl,o o[*
atgals drugzfrom criminals, Imbizzlgs :ovsrn
m•nt Jund:, fal31~c: recordi or amugzle; contra
band
February 2014 the Murder of Ruth
Ann Lodato for opening her front
door, daughter of Judge Giammittor
to Judge Bob Glammìttorio io & sister
FBI. Virginia senator

s
discussed corruption
t,y 05#OiZLQ[ŽCA
.t
October 9, 2015 The FBI & VA Senators in
(AP) VIFO,nla •ta
tl ølnolo,s qu-
lâv m,t wltn Iwm
omc-âl ,o, æ orl
v-tl
br..nno on he- .oe '0 /un
.-u' o. Nd..ml coin.DUon
•,ury f=u.d ronnir aoi lob
o¢ /Ii. /,nIZ ,/,Iivn///ræ
.v/. 'ho•:N .n.
Mioen,%-ugulty of o-Htno Rhl
br,Au-I.ci
loacl Th/ Ajsociz»:-a P/-,B
Oirnocrnuc L/æde, /h•/ wl/U. //n/t-
R,chwd L amst-w
.-•cl W-cn-sd-y E.
1
Justices- ChiefJudge Cynthia Kinser and
Justice Leroy Mülettc Jr. rcsigning, Judge
8~mi CA/n-'' /)c[Jx-• V
i :,/ L
/OH A
tnln•LG•cn-¤~nl*Ih.á,nxa
Ilj )/ P„bl Cnt,L•uu'Ia)6 TD,I>~_W'P!!ø,I t Potter retiring early, Commonwealth Attorney
Randy Sengcl retires at a young age. Thc Old
nzmumn-cnmmnnt.
Boys Network retires them early with all
, benefits - by all appearance as a"Thank
(~--.".-".*---*
u--m,*-"-0*
v--//N'*"**M
WM M'L-0//W
k
NWH
for hiding the Murder by Hirc and Suicides
you"
October 11, 2014 - Breaking news

Sonator Mark Warner and aid to
to offering a Federal Judgeship Governor Terry McAullffe guilty
to daughter of Phil Puckett and admit
October 14, 2014 - Janice exposes
on Blog Valaw2010.blogspot.cor
n information of corruption by Sena
tor Warner
October 22, 2014 Novemb
- er 12, 2014 - 22 days Jan
Solltaire Conflnement till Spm ice Illegally jailed and tortured In the City
on Election day Tuesday, Nov of Alexandria,
stop exposure of e-mails between ember 4, 2014. Illegally Jailed
herself and Mark Warner's office on to: 1. Silenc e her and
Mark Warner for help Instead the corruption In the Judiciary. Janic
he had her jailed , at the sam e went to
e time It waa exposed h] 3 "Pay
to Play' with a Federal
22de:92~NN;h*gel rgcnhoe~ obfyßä: aaunl~ytirnn Zod'~ä~'r committlng

Government and Elected Offic
ials
~*@oTZ ~*:.vtilt
accountable, as well as the crim ~~;
Virginia inal acts and actions of the Old
Boys Network in
December 19, 2014 Letter

exposed that Michael Gar
dner was looking for som
girls he had molested and eone to hire to Murder you
found guilty with DNA - yet ng
let out ofjail by Chief Justice
Cynthia Kinser.
(
December 31 , 201
4 Chief Justice Cynthia Kin
ser with no explanation to
her appointment) The App retire early (January 31 , 202
eals Court of the State 2 - expiration of
Cynthia Klnser let him out of Virginia had denied Mich
of jail by all appearance ael Gardner's appeal / release
for the Old Boys Networ -
women he had molested k , to hire a hit man to kill the
prior to his re-trail. She young
bidding of the Old Boys will receive her pension and
Network for ali her yea perks for cooperating and
rs. doing the
3
January 23, 2015 - The Virginia Republican Party wants the U.S. Senate to investigate
whether Democratic Sen.
Mark Warner violated federal law when he discussed possibl
e job opportunities for a former state senator' s daughter.
GOP Parly Chairman Pat Mullins sent a letter Friday to the U . S .
Senate Select Committee on Ethics asking it to
Investigate Warner. He was part of a group
of Democrats that tried unsuccessfully to prevent former state Sen. Phil
Puckett from reslgnlng last summer. Puckett's reslgnatlon gave Republicans control of the state
Senate. Warner has
acknowledged he 'brainstormed' with Puckett's son about possible job opportunities
for Puckett'ô daughter but did
not make any explicit job offers . Federal prosecutors Indicated In Decembe
r their Investigation Into Puckett' s
resignation was closed, they would ignore the criminal actions. That Janice
has followed up with a complaint to the
Ethics Committee by all appearance along with the Judiciary are Ignoring these facts, Murder
/ Sulcldes et al.
August 31, 2015 Janice Intervenes in the Charles Severance Case

September 2016 Judge Bellows "ORDER" Denies Janice Intervene with no hearing, and
Orders Clerks to take
no other filings by Janice
September 2015 Janice Intervenes in the Michael Gardner case - Michael Gardner
takes a plea. The Old
Boys Network cannot afford two Murder for Hire case's going at the same time. The question should
be for all -
What Is the back room deal the Old Boys Network made with Michael
Gardner for the plea and his silence .
On or around October 3, 2015 we come full cirde Charles Severance will be tried for the Murders
of Nancy Dunnlng,
Ron Kirby and Ruth Ann Lodato wlth a police office having told Janice they
had no real evidence that supports him
doing it, that the City of Alexandria was In the process of creating the needed evidence to support a
conviction. That
Judge Bellows who assisted Pete Scamado's Murder / Suicide of Chris Mackney will preslde over the
Charles
Severance trial. That Judge Bellows understands and will disallow evidence that
may find Charles Severance
innocent is without question, he has shown this In his pre-trlal Orders. That Judge Bellows
brings a Bias ln support
of Murder / Suicide Into the courtroom cannot be denied after reading
"Builled to Death". That Judge Bellows Is no
different than the Judge's that have ruled In Bias, Retribution, Retaliation with the
knowledgeable intend to ignore the
law and to protect the criminal acts of Dåvld Grenadler and Ilona Ely Grenadier
Heckman are obvious in all
documents and Orders filed In the courts. That Chris Mackney, Charles Severance
and Janice Wolk Grenadl•r
and MANY OTHERS have In common Is the Old Boys Network has made It
there mlsslon to kill or ruin there
lives to protect one of there owns criminal actlon
s.
No doubt the Murderer needs to be stopped , yet the person who

paid him to kill the above should be held
accountable - No one will out the Murderer for hire - because for free he will
take that person out. It is the belief of
Janice he does not killif he has met you - and talked to
you - He kills anonymous only , because if he didn't Janice
believes he would have killed her by now, but ,
that she has met him and he has spared her, as Mark Stuart did .
The "Old Boys Network' Is an evil Gang of men and few women
with no sole. They consist of the POWERFUL and
WEALTHY of the Judiciary, the Government and Elected Officials
in Virginia and the District of Columbia. They
believe they are above the law, and the truth supposedly your
best defense does not exist around them, that they are
no more then a bunch of low life bully's with money,
and no clæei, Th. l-æderæ tn thl, *Gang' ari Judg• Donald
Haddock and Judge Donald Kent at least in the case of Janice
Wolk Grenadler. In the case of Chris Mackney it was
Judge Bellows, who has now overiapped Into Janice's with the cover
up of the hits and the trial of Charles
Severance. That the following law firms have dirty hands
In colluslon of these actors: Grenadier Anderson Starace
Duffett and Kleser, Keller Heckman, DIMuroGInsb
erg, Troutman Sanders aka Mays & Valentine,
aka Bierman Geesling Ward and Wood, Parker BWW Law Group tr
Simon & Kokolls LLC, and other's that are known
and unknown.
Virginia Rategi 47th and 49th In Corrun
ilgn . Daily B•ast rated Virginia second
most Corrupt State -
http;//www.loudountlmes.com/Index,Dho/news/artlcle/realon
*urvev flnds vlralnlo second most corruot state98
Intogrity Gav• th•m •n F -47th most corrupt States 7/ - State
- htto:/hw,w.statelntearltv,ora/vlrqlnla That J,n/ce
and lack of over alt• or Du, Process In the cour /s not a/one th• corrupt/on
ts In Virginia, the Fodiræl Courts of DC and Virginia
Is and an a disgrace. 04
Yet to dætœ October 3, 2015 Janice has

not been Interviewed by the FBI in regar
even with her many phone calls to them d to the Information In this article
- for help to protect herself and her
girls.
4
William G. Truesdale Adult Dete
ntion Centcr Inmate Handbook
6
The Detention Center is a non-smoking

facility. If you bring or attempt to bring
such as cigarettes, cigars, lightcrs in smoking materials
or matches, you are violating ADC
disciplinary action. rules and are subject to
INMATE RIGHTS
You have certain rights which come from

the United States Constitution, the Cons
titution o f Virginia,
and federal, state and local laws. Thes
e rights are listed below. They arc diffe
services which are considered privilege rent than activities or
s. Privileges arc nicc to have, but the
required to give them to you. Priv Dete ntion Center is not
ileges include certain inmate programs
hygiene items, social telephone calls , com miss ary other than
, work assignments and your celt assig
your rights: nment. The following are
o Right to freedom from discrimination

based on race, religion, national origi
orientation or disability. n, gender, sexual
o Right to protection from perso

nal abuse, corporal punishment,
personal injury, disease,
property damage, harassment, sexu
al harassment or assault. Thc ADC
property while it is in our care. Ifyo staff will protect your
u experience problems relating
to your personal protection
or safety while in the Detention
Center, tell your Housing Unit
Deputy, Counselor or other
trusted staffmember. All complain
ts will be investigated.
o Right to unlimited access
to the courts and to address
uncensored communications to
governmental authorities . You
will not be subject to punishment or
or administrative relieffrom penalty if you seek judicial
the courts
o Right to equal access to Detention
Center program and work assignme
nts within the limits of
safety , security, program eligi
bility requirements, including healt
h mandates, and program
rules . This access includes inmat
es classified in Protective Custody.
Disciplinary Segregation inmates Administrative and
are afforded the same basic livin
g conditions and access to
Detention Center services as gene
ral population inmates.
o Right to send and receive mail
through the U.S. Postal Service.
Your right to use the mail can
only be curtailed by valid court
order, or except when there is a reas
your use of the mail is necessary onable belief that limiting
to protect public safety or facility
order and security.
o Right to the opportunity to
complete at least one telephon
e call during your admission
ADC. If you need assistance to to the
notify someone of your custody
o Right as a foreign national to status, please ask a Deputy.
your country' s diplomatic represen
tative.
o Right to access health care whi
le at the ADC , regardless ofyo
ur ability to pay.
YOUR FIRST HOURS AT THE

DETENTION CENTER
When you arrive at the ADC

, you will be held in the Boo
king area of the facility . Wh
you are allowcd THE OPP ile in Booking
ORT[JNrrY TO COMPLE
TE ONE local telephone call at no
to tell a family or friend charge to you
of your incarceration .
IF YOU HAVE NO FAM
LOCAL AREA, YOU MA ILY/FRIENDS IN THE
Y MAKE A COLLECT LO
NG DISTANCE CALL.
DEPUTY IF THE NUMB TELL A BOOKING
ER YOU WISH TO CA
LL IS LONG DISTANC
make collect or pre -paid E. You willonlybe able
phone calls once you to
arrive at your housing unit .
LIQUIDATION AGREEMENT
*d. 4
/ 7 day of
This Liquidation Agreement (the "Agreement") is made and entered into as of the
NT CO ., LTD ., a Virginia
'<~2,-/#, 10 -A, /1997 , by and between GRENADIER INVESTME
Góncral Partnership (the "Partnership"), ILONA ELY GRENADmR ("Ilona "), DAVID M.
GRENADIER ("David") and ( „ " ) (Ilona, David and being hereinafter referred to collectively as the
"Partners'.)
WITNESETH:
WHEREAS, David currently owns a Forty-nine (49%) percent interest in the Partnership, Ilona
currentiy owns a Fifty (51%) percent interest in the Partnership; and
WHEREAS, Ilona will be transferring 1% of her interest to Erika Ely Grenadier, and
WHEREAS , the Partnership has agreed to liquidate the interest of David pursuant to the terms
>
and conditions of this Agreement.
NOW THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency ofwhich
is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto do hereby agree as follows:
1. Liquidation or Interest The Partnership and the Partners hereby agree that David's
Forty-nine (49%) Percent interest in the Partnership shall be liquidated and that the Partnership shall
distrïbute to him the real prcpcrtìef listed on Ehibit "A", which is attached hereto and incorpo-•ted
herein (the "Properties") in full and finàlliquidation ofDavid's Partnership interest. David agrees that
he shall be solely liable for, and shall pay when due, all debts, liabilities, taxes, insurance, assessments, or
any other expenses of any nature which relate to, or arise out ofthe Properties, including, but not
limited to, the notes secured by deeds oftrust, mortgages ,taxes, insurance; etc . with respect to the
j'-1
f
Properties (the notes and deeds oftrust are listed on Exhibit "B", which is attached hereto and
m., incorporated herein). David wìll hold Ilona Grenadier, Erika Grenadier and the Grenadier partnership
harmless and indemnify them individually and collectively against any financial obligation with reference
to the propdes listed on Exhibit Å, including but not limited to the mortgages/deeds oftrust listed on
Exhibit B, taxes and insurânce. David agrees to provide to the Grenadier Investment partnership and
each of the Partners written notice of any default under the Mortgages and/or any delinquency with
respect to real estate taxes fòr any ofthe Properties. In addition, David shall provide the Partnership and
each of the Partners with copies of any notices óf default or delinquency received by him with respect to
any ofthe Properties within three (3) days of receipt ofsame. In any such event, David shall have a
reasonable linie to cure said default or delinquency, but in the event said default(s) is/are not cured
within said nincty days, and, in the event there is anv lìabilitv therefor on the part of the Partnership ,
Ilona Grenadier or Erika Grenadier, then David agrees that fee simple title to the real property that is
-
--
subject to the mortgage in default or for which the real estate taxes are delinquent shall be, at_the option
ofthe Partnership, transferred to the Partnership and David shall thereafter have no further interest in or
to said property. Further, David does hereby agree to an Assignment ofRents and Leases which shall be
activated by the necessity for the partnership or any ofthe individuals (Ilona or Erika) to make payment
ofany sort on any ofthe properties on Exhìbit A. David acknowledges and agrees that as ofthe
effective date of this Agreement he shall have no interest in the Partnership or in any of its properties,
which are listed on Exhibit C, and the partnership shail hold David harmless and indemnifr him against
financial obligations on the properties listed on Exhibit C.

2. Record Title of the Properties . Currently, record litlc to the Properties is held in
Partnership.
the name of Ilona Ely Grenadier, trustee, who has served in such capacity as Trustee for the
properties to be
All parties hereto acknowledge ~1 agree that the record title will be changed to the
transferred to David, provided the lender holding the notes secured by the deeds of trust will agree to
Grenadier, homme sole,

same. In any event however, lienà:forth the-þroperties shall belong to David
* - except as set out hereinabove. David shall immediately contact the lender(s) and obtain removal ofthe
Partnership and Ilona Grenadier Avm the loans. Should any ofthese properties be sold prior to transfer
into David's name, all tax obligations, income, capital gains and others, shall be the obligation ofDavid
Grenadier, who shall hold Ilona Ely Grenadier, Erika Ely Grenadier and the partnership harmless and
indemnifý them against same.
3. Reuresentations and Warrantie, or David. David represents, warrants, and
covenants to the Partnership and the Partners as follows, which representations, warranties, and '
covenants shall continue in füll force and effect after the execution ofthis Agreement:
(A) David is the legal and equitable owner of a Forty Nine percent Partnership
interest in the Partnership and the same is hereby being conveyed, in liquidation, free and clear ofany
and alltiens and encumbrances.
(B) David agreeã from time to time to execute all necessary and reasonable
documentation to effectuate the liquidation ofsuch Partnership interest.
4. Indemniflcation. David covenants and agrees to and docs hereby indemnify lhe
Partnership, its partners, and their successors and assigns, and hold them harmless from, against, and in
- respect of any and all costs, losses, claims, liabilities, fines taxes, penalties, damages, and expenses
(including interest which may be imposed in connection therewith, court costs, and reasonable fees and
disbursements ofcounsel), incurred by any ofthem in connection with:
(A) any misrcprescntation, omission, or breach of any ofthe representations,
warranties, covenants, or agreements made by David.in this Agreement, in the Exhibits hereto, or any ,
agreements delivered in connection with the transactions contemplated hereby;
(B) the Mortgages;
(C) the Properties; and
(D) any action, suit, proceeding, compromise, settlement, assessment, or judgment
arising out ofor incident to any ofthe matters indemnified against pursuant to this Section 4.
5. Resif~nation as Managing Partner. As ofthe effective date ofthis Agreement
David hereby resigns as the designated Managing Partner ofthe Partnersh*, it being recogrú,p<1 that
, :
I
Ilona has been Etìng as the managing partner since approximately 1991 with reference to the properties
and since December, 1994 with reference to alt except those now being transferred to David. The
Partners hereby acknowledge and designate Ilona as the new Managing Partner.
6, Misce!!aneous.
6.1. Survival. All representations, warranties covenants and agreements ofthe
þarties herein shall survive the execution ofüüs Agreement.
6.2. Governine Law. All questions concerning the construction, validity and
interpretation of this Agreement and the performance ofthe obligations imposed by this
Agreement will
be governed by the intemal laws, and not the law ofconflicts, ofthe Common
wealth of Virginia.
conveniencc only and shall
- 6.3 . Headingž· The headings set forth herein are for
the sections in which they appear.

not be used in interpreting the text of
ired , permitted or desirable

6.4 . Notices . Any notice or other communication requ
prepaid, addressed as
if sent by United States Mail, postage
hereunder, shall be m]fficiently given
follows:
Partncr3hip: c/o Ilona Ely Grenadier

Grenadier, Davis & Simpson, P . C .
Ilona: c/o Grenadier, Davis & Simpson, P.C.

Alexandrig Virginia 22314
With Copy To:

Neil Guyvitch, Wecheler, Selzer &
Esquire Gurvitch, Chartered
4550 Montgomery Avenue
Suite 900N -
Bethesda, MD 20814
David: c/o David Grenadier

532 N. Washington Street
Alexandriai Virginia
to
6.5. Succeisors and Assigns. This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure
tatives, successors and assigns.

the benefit ofthe parties hereto, their heirs persona] represen
6.6. Entire Agreement This Agreement and the Exhibits attached hereto , sets
and there are no other prior or

forth the entire agreement and understanding oftbe parties,
promises, warranties, or covenants not

contemporaneous written or oral agreements, undertakings,
waived , modified
ned herein . This Agreement cannot be
1 specifically referred to, attached hereto or contai
hereto.
or changed except by a writing signed by thc parties
date
have duly executed this Agreement as of the
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto
-
and year set forth above.
GRENADIER INVESTMENT CO., LTD.
BY:~~ ~\-
<ÍS->tibna Ely Gr~,ádier,~hrt~er *--
Q n;
BY: *#6**AE-+
David M. Gren,dier, Partner
BY:
Erika Grena(tier, Partner
r-> (ngí 9
díý j<5 c /ÚC/ \\-)
'Ilbna Elly Gre;padier -
-
PÁ,
r'/116I-w u
David M. Grenadier
'é
lû]CITTRIT " A"
n .
33 S. Gordon Street Alexandria. Virsdnia
224 Guthrie Avenue Alexandria. Virginia
636- 638.628 Four Mile Road Alexandria. Virginia
322 E. Hume Alexandriz Virßnía
28 East Bellefonte Alexandria. Vìrßnia
jw;
EX-HIBIT "B"
Mortgages
33 S. Gordon Approx.$84.Úôð
224 Guthrie Approx $86-000
636.638.628 Four Mile Road Approx. $64.000 each
322 E. Hume Approx. $ 92.000

.
28 East Bellefonte Approx. $175.000
1
ASSIGNMENT
I, ILONA ELY GRENADIER (the "Assignor"), do hereby transfer

and assign to
2.YL-~A. fl~Miw<Zp, (the 'Assignee"), all of thc Assignor's right, title

and interest in and to
¿~~
a One (1.0) perfnt general partnership interest held by Assigno
r in Grenadier Investment Co., Ltd. (the
"Property"),
The Assignor warrants and represents that the Assignor has the
full, complete and absolute right
and authority to transfer the Property to the Assignee and

agrees to defend the Assignee's title and right
in and to the same at the Assignor's sole and exclusi

ve cost and expense.
The parties intend that this Assignment shall vest in the Assigne
e full ownership ofthe Property,
and that no other document oftransfer or assignment shall

be required by the parties or any other
person. However, should any additional document or

action be required óf the Assignor to vest in the
Assignee ownership ofany ofthe Property, the Assign

or agrees to execute and deliver to the Assignee
any such document and to take such further action

as the Assignee deems necessaIy in its sole
discretion.
IN WITNESS WREREOF, the Assign

or h'™ caused thi < instrument to be executed as ofthe
.D/At)
l-Žfâiy of /f70*>,i,d-Lc, ..., igg72~>G<r.- -(Seal)
ILONA ELY GR~NADIER
The above assignment is hereby agreed to by

Grenadier Investment Co ,)]Prá .
By:& f /4 ~,
t~~~~~Sdl„_
™-*a Ely Grc~dicr, Partner
-XU A /---
By: V,/tg'/ L (Seal)
David Grenadier, Partner
1
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
ALEXANDRIA DIVISION
In re: Case No. 16 - 13028
Janice Wolk Grenadier (JWG) Chapter 13

V.
Divorce Lawyer Ilona Ely Freedman Grenadier Heckman (IEG)

Defendant
Exhibits to Adverse Complaint October 4, 2016
Exhibit No. Description No Pages
1 GIC Property Description May 1991 3

2 GIC Trust Agreement May 1993 2
3 Re-New of Note - Virginia Commerce December 1994 1
4 Burke & Herbert FDIC Enforcement July 1997 3
5 Liquidation Agreement of Partnership - Lawyer not Lic in VA 9
and Janice did not sign
6 Deed of Bargain & Sale shows Liquidation Agreement did not 3
hold up on March 13, 2000
7 Information sheet on Southampton 1
8 Information sheet on 404 E. Monroe Ave 1
9 Interest Calculation on Loan for $30,000. 1
10 Divorce Docket Sheet shows the collusion and Corruption to 3
cover up the truth
li
28 £ '@LU+*Jtr
-* 4 £ #Æmlroú Aue
L'._..-· Ely
Prepared
freedman Grenadier
May, A<1-
Heckman Investment Properties
-Øttl luaií_ -Ib!,XZLd,( Fb*A *66 gd=
~
(_l*p/T© (-3}3*Dw
GROSS
ACQUIS. CONTRACT CURRENT ASSESSMENT AMT. OF MORTGAGES NAME OF PAYMENTS RENTAL NET RENTAI
PROPERTY ADDRESS DATE PRICE PRESENT MKT. VALUE* 6 LIENS ( NOTES ) LIENHOLDER/ NO . P . I . r . I. INSURANCE INCOME INCOME/LOS
1623 Francis HA=mond PIG/Y $193.100.00 91,399.62 1st /5170931 2,017.90

Alexandria, VA 22302 Shearson
07-31-85 $115,700.00 $224,000.00* 30,230.12 2nd(IEF) 1,085.81 448.00 1,135 39.19
G.I.C.
16 Wesc Bellefonte Avenue $243.900.00 91,448.18 1.t #5170907 2,548.76

Ale]undria. VA. 22301 08-07-85 $107,500.00 $225,000.00* 22,909.32 2nd(IEF) Shearson 1.190.14 449.00 1,050 (140.14)
C.I.C.
44 East Taylor Run PKWY $131,100.00 73.372.26 1st #9106473-05 1.370.00

Alexandria. VA. 22314 08-23-85 $83.000.00 $145,000.00* 14,986.86 2nd(IEF) Citicorp 908.00 284.00 900 (8.00)
G. I.C.
1813 Leslie Avenue $117.700.00 64.684.24 1st #9106374-06 1,229.97

Alexandrla. VA. 22301 09-13-85 $73.000.00 $135,000.00* 12,861.91 2nd(IEF) Citicorp 825.00 233.00 825 (6.00)
G.I.C.
54 East Taylor Run PKWY $128,900.00 72,585.21 1st #5946541 1,347.01

Alexandria, VA. 22314 09-30-85 $86.500.00 $145.000.00 11.806.13 2nd(IEF) Bowest 938.62 285.00 952 13.38
G.I.C.
33 South Gordon Street $112,100.00 62,898.25 1st #9108520-18 1,171.45

Alexandría. VA. 22304 10-09-85 $71.000.00 $135.000.00* 11.217.30 Citicorp 807.00 233.00 800 (7.00)
G. I.C-
61 Eas t Taylor Run PKWY

$143.600.00 84.536.25 lat #909614-09 1.500.62
Alexandria, VA. 22314 10-24-85 $85,000.00 $145,000.00* 4.206.62 2nd(IEF) Citicorp 1.005.00 285.00
(currently under contract of sale) k~
*Dp Vûl
I SCJi'~Wcujl -ÏU Ald< Ziqe, 5*· 3, 24818
Ztq<îž/401 *ùa -lo4 g lð,Kll
íb*# 9¥i döü L Giwb. A*.~
, Lj UDAJ, N) ,1/tl líl Eéì _ : __ _ ._=-- - n
<341*tø 1*[
Iþll@9
GRENADIER HECKMAN INVESTMENT PROPERTIES
ILONA ELY FREEDMAN
Prepared May , 1991
Page 2
GBOSS
PAYMENTS TAXES 6 RENTAL NET RENTAL
AMT . OF MORTGAGES NAME OF
CONTRACT CURRENT ASSESSMENT INCOME/LOSS
ACQU15. P.I.T.I. INSURANCE INCOME
VALUE* & LIENS (NOTES) LIENHOLDEEUNO.
PRICE PRESENT MKT.
PROPERTY ADDRESS DATE
64,246.90 1st #9171677-18 1,206.98

Street $115,500.00 689.00 282.00 848 152.00
2943 Sycamre Citicorp
$140,000.00* 11.636.25 2nd(IEF)
Alexandria, VA. 22305 04-09-86 $73,000.00
G. I.C.
61,301.16 let #253635 1.128.60

$108.000.00 233.00 785 70.32
415 East Delray Avenue 10,567.02 2nd(IEF) Barclays 714.68
22301 08-05-86 $70.000.00 $130.000·00*
Alexandria, VA.
G. I.C.
70,958.00 1=t #1820575 1,191.00

2945 Sycaggre Street $114,000.00 Chemical 762.00 282.00 825 63.00
12,263.48 2nd
22305 09-05-86 $81,000.00 $140.000.00*
Alexandria, VA.
G. I.C.
58,394.40 ist #1875715 888.25

$85,000.00 170.00
710 Four tlile r»ad 9,959.51 2nd Chemical 615.00 211.00 785
22305 10~02-86 $63,000.00 $110,000.00*
Almdria, VA.
G.I.C.
70,313.16 1st #160603 1,171.45

224 Guthrie Avenue $112,100.00 285.00 845 87.22
Barclays 757.78
22305 lù-31-86 $140,200.00* 10.827.69 2nd
Alexandria. VA. $77,000.00
G.I.C.
#9852770-05 2,382.60
$228,000.00 121,166.87 let
28 East Belefonte Avenue 550.00 1,600 305.01
Citicorp 1,354.00
22301 12-31-86 $137,000.00 $325,000.00*
Alexandria, VA.
(1/2 G.I.C. 6 partnership (1/87)
w/J. Wolk)
79,309.86 Ist #4220646 1,735.75

322 East Hume Avenue $166,100.00 780.00 282.00 785 5.00
13,016.47 2nd SCG Mortg.
Al~¥andria. VA. 22301 03-31-87 $89,900.00 $150,000.00*
G.I.C.
ILOMA ELY FREEDMAN GRENADIER HECKMAN INVESTMENT PROPERTIES
MÄI, 1991
Page 3
GROSS
AMT. OF MORTGAGES NAME OF PAYMENTS TAXES 6 RENTAL NET RENTAL
ACQUIS. CONTRACT CURRENT ASSESSMENT
PRICE PRESENT HKT. VALUE* & LIENS (NOTES) LIENHOLDER/NO. P,I.T.I. INSURANCE INCOME INCOME/ LOSS
PROPERTY ADDRESS DATE
404 East Monroe Avenue $328,000.00 450,000.00 ist #2398001 3,427.60

Alexandria, VA. 22301 08-31-87 $550,000.00*
VA. Commerce 4,098.44 1,416.00 5.440
$400,000.00
1/2 G.I.C. &
1/2 Heckman (J 6 I)
70,000.00 1st #1022896 908.11

628 Notabene Drive $86,900.00
22305 15,000.00 +2nd B & H 686.00 215.00 775 168.64
Alaxandria, VA. 10-15-87 $80,000.00 $110,000.00*
G.I.C.
636 Nocabene Drive 70,000.00 1st #1022897 873.62

$83,600.00
15.000.00+2nd B&H 686.00 215.00 800 193.64
Alexandria, VA. 22305 10-15-87 $80,000.00 $110.000.00*
G.I.C.
70,000.00 1st #1022898 873.62

638 Notabene Drive $83,600.00
15,000.00+2nd BáH 686.00 215.00 795 188.64
Alexandria ,VA . 22305 10-15-87 $80,000.00 Sllo,000.00
G.I.C.
$83,300.00 70,000 læt #1022899 870.49

707 Four Mile Road
10-15-87 15.000+2nd 86X 686.00 215.00 175 168.64
Alexandria, VA. 22305 $80.000.00 $110,000.00*
G.I.C.
#1022900 868.40
713 Four Mile Road $83,100.00 70,000 Ist
15,000+2nd B&8 606.36 215.00 800 193. 64
Alexandria, VA. 22305 10-15-87 $80,000.00 $110,000.00*
G.I.C.
70,000 1st #1022901 864.22

715 Four Mile Road $82,700.00
VA. 22305 10-15-87 15,000+2nd B&H 606.36 215.00 845 238.64
Alexandria, $80,000.00 $110,000.00*
G.I.C.
..L
k gwtp
Íj 4• S i
r*-4 Ç. .
* Ü-l«
- Sex *bt'
3~
TRUST AGREEMENT -
into this 12th day of

TRUST AGREEMENT is enterod
THIS
May , 1993 , by and between ASJA A -* 44»~7; * klp
and Ilona Ely GRENADIER , TRUSTEE

( hereinafter called " Beneficiary ( ies )")
LTD.,( hereinafter called "Trustee" ).

for GRENADIER INVESTMENT COMPANY,
WITNESSETH
1§§ WHEREAS, the "Tru•tee' has/had acquired certain parcel(s) of
attached exhibit
real
d
Virginia , ( See
) N 1- estate located tn the City of Alexandria ,
1 n m
•4 -1 A for ~
in Ilona Ely Grenadier, Trustee
for property de•criptions vested
'A~
Grenadier Inv•etment Company, Ltd.,) and;

982
3 tn a,
of thi• Trugt Agreement
pursuant to the terms and conditions
D LO IA
WHEREAS,
30 to
"Beneficiaries- in
j S St of and in the interest of
"Trustee" has acted on behalf
so-doing.
888 1,
and conditions set
CS@ NOW , THEREFORE , in consideration of the covenants
1
consideration, the receipt and
ižž forth herein, and other good and valuable
as
~
the parties hereto agree
gufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged ,
(0
.
follows:
R Invegtment Company,
1. Ilona Ely Grenadler, as Trustee for Grenadier
E
all those parcelg located in the ~
hold the entire interest in
Ltd., shall
so named and in the ;

of Alexandria, Virginia for the Beneficiaries
City
percentages so described below :
'j
BENETICIARIES;
ÜuwRJAAI- W#*Lll &6(7, 4*
ØP
M u1 <>
6
2 . The terms , conditions , rights and responsbilitiis of the parti••
15*
shall be determined at a future
• hall be governed by guidelines , which
from time to time to change the

point in time , and may be amended
interest in the ownership of said real property

Ben•ficiaries percentage
as identified hereinabove.
3 . This Truit Agreement and all of its terms , conditions ,
provisions , and limitations aa set forth shall be congtrued in accordance
with the laws of the Commonwoalth of Virginia .
4 . To have and to hold tho land herein de , cribed , in trust , with th .
and authority, hereby granted unto the said trugtee, to

full power, right
sell, lease, exchange, encumber and or convey the said land, without the
necessity of joinder of any beneficiary, either in whole or in part, upon
such terms and conditions and for guch consideration that said trustee ,
may in his/her/their discretion deem advantageous, with the further right
to subdivide æuch land and to dedicate auch portions thereof for public
uæ• a• he/ghe/they shall deem degirable, togothar with th• right to grant
for utility or other purposes across, over and or

licenses and easements
the said land without the joinder of any beneficiary, and there
under
liability upon any purchaser or lessee of any

shall be no obligation or
loan or loans secured by deed or deeds of trust upon said land , or any
part thereof to see to the proper application of the proceeds of such
sale, 1•ase or loan.
may from time to time remove Trustee and appoint a

5. Beneficiaries
successor trustee to any trustee appointed hereunder. Without conveyance
of the Property, the successor trustee shall succeed to all the title,
power and duties conferred upon Trustee herein and by applicable law .
GRENADIER INVESTMENT COMPANY, LTD.
BY:
BY: *t.
1!
10/3/2016 FDIC: 1997 - Docket No. FDIC-97-048b
FDIC Enforcement Decisions and Orders
Il l wl l I:ä.âcâmâ l EQánEnln
{{10-31-99 p,C-4375}}
[ll,423] In the Matter of C.S. Taylor Burke, Burke & Herbert Bank & Trust
Company, Alexandria, Virginia, Brentwood, Missouri, Docket No. FDIC 97-048b (7-
1-97)
A cease-and desist order was issued, based on findings by the FDIC that it had reason
to believe that respondent had engaged in unsafe and unsound banking practices . (This
order was terminated by order of the FDIC dated 8-6-99; see 1\16, 237.)
Ll] Loans-lmprudent Loans-Cease-and-Desist Order

[,z] Directors-Loans-Prior Approval
[i] Disclosures-Directors-Personal Financial Dealings Il
6] Disclosures--Directors-Personal Ownership Interest or Service H
[t] Unsafe or Unsound Practices-Ethics Training
In the Matte r of
C.S. TAYLOR BURKE, Ill
individually, and as an
institution-affiliated party of
BURKE & HERBERT BANK AND
TRUST COMPANY
ALEXANDRIA, VIRGINIA
(Insured State Nonmember Bank)
ORDER TO CEASE AND DESIST
FDIC-97-048b
C.S. TAYLOR BURKE, Ill, ("Respondent"), individually, and as an institution-affiliated

party of Burke & Herbert Bank and Trust Company, Alexandria, Virginia ("Bank"), having
been advised of his right to receive a written Notice of Charges and of Hearing
("NOTICE") detailing the unsafe or unsound banking practices alleged to have been
committed by the Respondent and of his right to a hearing regarding such alleged charges
under section 8(b)(1) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act ("Act"), 12 U.S.C. §
1818(b)(1),
and having waived those rights, entered into a STIPULATION AND CONSENT TO THE
https://www.fdic.gov/banldindivldual/enforcemenU:11423.html
1/3
10/3/2016 FDIC: 1997 - Docket No. FDIC-97-048b
ISSUANCE OF AN ORDER TO CEASE AND DESIST ("CONSENT AGREEMENT") with a

representative of the Legal Division of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
("FDIC"), dated July 1, 1997, whereby solely for the purpose of this proceeding and
without admitting or denying any of the alleged charges of unsafe or unsound banking
practices the Respondent consented to the issuance of an ORDER TO CEASE AND
DESIST ("ORDER") by the FDIC.
The FDIC considered the matter and determined that it had reason to believe that the
Respondent had engaged in unsafe or unsound banking practices.
The FDIC, therefore, accepted the CONSENT AGREEMENT and issued the following:
{{10-31-99 p.C-4376}}
ORDER TO CEASE AND DESIST
[.1] IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that the Respondent cease and desist from the following
unsafe or unsound banking practices:
A. Making personal loans to Bank customers;

B. Purchasing loans from the Bank.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Respondent take affirmatke action as follows :
[.2] 1. Effective the date of this ORDER, the Respondent shall not cause the Bank to
extend loans in excess of $200,000 without the prior approval of the Bank's Loan
Committee and subsequent ratification by the Bank's board of directors;
[.3] 2. Effective the date of this ORDER and on an ongoing basis thereafter, the il
Respondent shall make full disclosure to the Bank's board of directors of any of I
Respondent's personal financial dealings with Bank customers. 1
[.4] 3. Effective the date of this ORDER and on an ongoing basis thereafter, the n
Respondent shall make full disclosure to the Bank's board of directors of any of
Respondent's personal ownership interest in and/or service in any official capacity for or
on behalf of any entity which is a Bank customer, including , but not limited to , service as
an employee, officer, director or independent contractor of such customer.
[.s] 4. Within sixty (60) days of the effective date of this Order, the Respondent shall
attend ethics training designed to highlight the impropriety and/or unsafe or unsound
practice relative to conflicts of interest, selfdealing or appropriation of corporate
opportunity.
5. The provisions of this ORDER shall become effective ten (10) days from the date of
its issuance and shall be binding upon the Respondent. The provisions of this ORDER
shall remain effective and enforceable except to the extent that, and until such time as,
any provisions of this ORDER shall have been modified, terminated, suspended, or set
aside by the FDIC.
Pursuant to delegated authority. ,
Dated at Atlanta, Georgia, this 1st day of July, 1997. 1
https:/Nmw.fdic.gov/banløndividual/enforcement/11423.html
2/3
lû/3/2016 FDIC: 1997 - Docket No. FDIC-97-048b
ED&0 Home I Search_Ecrm I Ie*tßea[Çh I EQAQ-Hn!2
Lag Updated 6/6/2003 legal¢Dfdic.aov
Holïir, Colìl:ICl US VA':Iisllt. POI'(:1('f, Se:ìlclì
https:/A,Aww.fdic.gov/bank/individual/enforcernenül.1423.htnil
3/3
/1
€t
N#i*8
NMNZ
j" *MM"
Z ":Mýi - ts Ig * ,=
ö
tp
:240.,53
0 /Ä g.
Þ
Š
-f P m i#ji i
1 1 .* ß B
-= M 'M .g
3 g. 3
C) :
i g :§8 Ii- ~ I Ii·i,

N ·-'
Z
g! i ° : 1 A
1 W 0
M Wo.U#i
Bhí' i
Mäao'
46=1
4'
.E
44
WK ß t 0
11@8
H
0, 4'
04 A
&4
A
lgtEi1
0
IMŠ' i' , - t;
wli=gi
mV A' ilgllä 1 0
{)((XZ '~*!A 'n}JI'd

M" Mins'P•o:i:n!H wqm=Xf" :
9006/hgl ·'¥=r'ql Jl 'Hi!15!RWH:)13(1 19 HNÃMÍ
VA ~~
'>lil[)HâtíNOHJS 'NOSMD *
REEMENT
LIQUIDATION AG
-Nk
de and ent ere d int o as of the / 7 day of
) is ma
ment (the "Agreement"
This Liquidation Agree
., a Virginia
MENT CO ., LTD
by and bet wee n GR ENADIER INVEST
~1997 ,
'<7 ~> i.r,: Ø -zf*.·d
VID M.
ADIER ("Ilona"), DA
e "Pa rtn ers hip "), ILONA ELY GREN
(th
Gd~ral Partnership
the
ed to collectively as
na , Da vid and bei ng hereinafter referr
") and (" ") (Ilo
GRENADIER ("David
"Paáners".)
WITNESETH:
Ilona
rest in the Partnership,
cur ren tly ow ns a For ty-nine (49%) percent inte
WHEREAS, David
i
; and
s a Fift y (51% ) per cen t interest in the Partnership
currently own
l
ka Ely Grcnadier, and
wil l be tra nsf err ing 1% of her interest to Eri
WHEREAS, Ilona
d pursuant to the terms
has agr eed to liqu ida te the interest ofDavi
tnership h >
WHEREAS, the Par
Agreement.
and conditions ofthis
ofwhich
receipt and sufficiency
RE, for goo d and val uable consideration, the
NOW THEREFO
agree 83 follows :
, the parties hereto do hereby
is hereby acknowledged
that David' s
Partners hereby agree
The Partnership and the
1. Llcluidation of Interest.
Partnership shall
be liquidated and that the
t in the Partnership shall
Forty-nine (49%) Percent interes
and incorpo•-,ted
, which is attached hereto
ribu te to him tlic real prc p.rtieq listed on E„hibit "A"
dist
David agrecs that
id's Partnership interest.
"Pr ope rtie s") in füll and final liquidation of Dav
herein (the
, or
taxes, insurance, assessments
le for, and shal l pay whe n due, all debts, liabilities,
he shall be solely liab
n*
Properties , including, but
othe r expe nses of any natu re, which relate to, or arise out of the
any
ect to the
,taxes, insurance, etc. with resp
by deeds of trust, mortgages
limited to, the notes secured
1,
/\
Í
on Exhibit "B", which is attached hereto and

Properties (the notes and deeds oftrust arc listed ~
Erika Grenadicr and the Grenadier partnership ~

incorporated herein). David will hold Ilona Grenadier,
financial obligation with reference

harmless and indemnify them individually and collectively against any
oftrust listed on
to the properties listed on Exhibit A, including but not limited to the mortgages/deeds
hip and ß
Exhibit B , taxes and insurance . David agrees to provide to the Grenadier Investment partners
and/or any delinquency with

each ofthe Partners written notice of any default under the Mortgages
the Partnership and

respect to real estate taxes for any of the Properties . In addition David shall provide
by him with respect to

each ofthe Partners with copies of any notices óf default or delinquency received
any ofthe Properties within three 0) days ofreceipt ofsame. In any such event David shall have a
is/arc not cured

reasonable time to cure said default or delinquency, but in the event said default(3)
within said ninety days, and, in the event there is any liabilitv therefor on the part ofthe Pannership,
that is
Ilona Grenadier or Erika Grenadier, then David agrees that fee simple title to the real property
subject to the mortgage in default or for which the real estate taxes are delinquent shall be, at the option
ofthe Partner*9: transferred to thc Partnership and David shall thereafter have no further interest in or
to said property. Further, David does hereby agree to an Assignment ofRents and Leases which shall be
activated by the necessity for thc partnership or any of the individuals (Uona or Erika) to make payment
ofany sort on any ofthc properties on Exhibit A. David acknowledges and agrees that as ofthe '
t
effective date ofthis Agreement he shall have no interest in the Partnership or in any of its properties,
which are listed on Exhibit C, and the partnership shall hold David harmless and indemnify him against
financìal obligations on the properties listed on Exhibit C.
?%
11
Properties is hcld in
Record Title of the Proverties . Currently, record title to the
2.
Trustee for the Partnership .

e, has served in such capacity as
the name of Ilona Ely Grenadier, truste who
to the propertiesto be !
the record title will be changed
All parties hereto acknowledge and agree that
by the deeds oftrust will agree to

lender holding the notes secured
transferred to David, provided the
sole,
ng to David Grenadier, homme
éeforth the -properties shall belo
same. In any event however, lión
val ofthd
diately contact the lender(s) and obtain remo
except as set out hereinabove. David shall imme
be sold prior to transfer

the loans. Should any ofthese properties
Partnership and Ilona Grenadier from
tion ofDavid
e, capital gains and others, shall be the obliga
into David ' s name, all tax obligations , incom
ess and
Erika Ely Grenadier and the partnership harml
Grenadier, who shall hold Ilona Ely Grenadier,
indemnify them against same.
3. Representations and Warranties of David. David represents, warrants, and ~.
'
s, which representations, warranties. and
covenants to the Partnership and the Partners as follow
,
after the execution of this Agreement:
covenants shall continue in full force and effect
percent Partnership
(A) David is the legal and equitable owner ofa Forty Nine ~
d, in liquidation, free and clear of an~

interest in the Partnership and the same is hereby being conveye
1
and alltiens and encumbrances .
necessary and reasonable ,

(B) David agrees *om time to time to execute all
ship interest.
documentation to effectuate the liquidation of such Partner
ify the ~ .
4. Jndemnlficntion. David covenants and agrees to and äoes hereby indcmn
harmless from, against, and in

Partnership , its partners, and their successors and assigns, and hold them
respect of any and all costs, losses, claims, liabilities, fines, taxes, penalties , damages , and expenses
8
Pe
1
Oncluding interest which may be imposed ill connection therewith, court costs, and reasonable fces and
disbursements ofcounsel), incurred by any ofthem in connection with:

1 . 1
1
(A) any misrepresentation, omission, or breach of any ofthe representations,
warranties, covenants, or agreements made by David in this Agreement, in the Exhibits hereto, or any
agreements delivered in connection with the transactions contemplated hereby;
(B) the Mortgages;

1
(C) thc Properties; and
(D) any action, suit, proceeding, compromise, settlement, assessment, or judgment ,I
arising out ofor incident to any ofthc matters indemnificd against pursuant to this Section 4.
5. Resienntion as Manafine Partner. As ofthe effective date ofthis Agreement,
' David hereby resigns as the designated Managing Partner of the Partnershiþ, it being recogNzed that '
Ilona has been acting as the managing partner since approximately 1991 with reference to the properties
and since December, 1994 with reference to all except those now being transferred to David. The "
1,
'1 l
Partners hereby acknowledge and designate Ilona as the new Managing Partner.
4 !
6. Miscellaneous.
6.1. Survivnl. All representations, warranties, covenants and agreements ofthe
parties herein shall survive the execution ofthis Agreement.
6 .2. Governine Law . All questions concerning the construction , validity and
interpretation ofthis Agreement and the performance ofthe obligatio

ns imposed by this Agreement will :
be governed by the internal laws, and not the law ofconflicts,

ofthe Commonwealth of Virginia. T,
i1
,
-4
- 6. 3. Bendinzž.
not be used in interpreting the text
6 .4. Notices .
The headings set forth herein are
ofthe sections in which they appear.
Any notice or other commun

for convenience only and
ication required , permitted or

shall
desirable
1
~
addressed as
sufi ìcie ntly give n if sen t by Uni ted States Mail, postage prepaid,
hereunder, shall bc
follows:
Partnership: c/o Ilona Ely Grenadier

Grenadier, Davis & Simpson, P . C .
P.C.
Ilona: c/o Grenadier, Davis & Simpson,
With Copy To:

Neil Gurvitch, Wechcler, Selzer &
Esqulre Gurvitch, Chartered 1 >
4550 Montgomery Avenue i
Suite 900N
Bethesda, MD 20814
David: c/o David Grcnadier

532 N. Washington Street
Alexandria, Virginia
and inure to
This Agreement shall be binding upon
6 .5 . Successors and Assiens .
sentatives, successors and assigns .

the benefit ofthe parties hereto, their heirs , personal repre
hed hereto, sets ~,

6 .6. Entire Aereement . This Agreement and the Exhibits attac
or
ofthe parties, and there are no other prior
forth the entire agreement and understanding
, or covenants not :
ments, undertakings, promises, warranties
contemporaneous written or oral agree
96>\
dified
cannot be waived, mo
o or con tain ed her ein, This Agreement
to, attached heret
specifically referred
ies hereto.
a writing signed by the part
or changed except by
reement as ofthe date
par ties her eto have duly executed this Ag
F, the
IN WITNESS WHEREO
r. . Il
ve.
and year set forth abo
MENT CO., LTD.

GRENADIER INVEST
1!
BY:qf& C«-
Yn-rtàer
63>Iibna Ely Gr«àdier, ~
3>7 *--£+
0 n;
BY: 2~àx= ~ 1,
David M. Gre niidier, Partner
BY:
Erika Grenadier, Partner
F .'
<í.--,Dllina Ely Gr~adier
~2-.sfž»SÚ'
ier
David M. Grenad
!1
EXHIBIT"A"
Z[QFÊdižâ
33 S. Gordon Street Alexandria. Virginia
224 Guthrie Avenue Alexandria. Virginia
636.638.628 Four Mile Road Alexandria. ·Virninia
322 E. Hume Alexandria. VirHiniü
28 East Bellefonte Alexandria. Vìrinia
S¥-
11
EXHIBIT " IL"
Mortöaees
33 S. Gordon Approx. $84.®Ò
224 Guthrie Approx $86.000
636.638.628 Four Mile Road Approx. $64.000 each
322 E. Hume Approx. $ 92.000

.
28 East Bellefonte Approx. $1-75.000
1
ASSIGNMENT
I, ILONA ELY GRENADIER (the "Assignor"), do hereby transfer and assign to
2!~¿,Z#. ¿~d~ c,~;~,~r/fø:* (the "Assignee'). allof the Assignor's light, title and intercstin and to
a One (1 . 0) perfnt general partnership interest held by Assignor in Grenadier Investment Co ., Ltd . (the
"Property").
The Assignor warrants and represents that the Assignor has the full, complete and absolute right ~
and authority to transfer the Property to the Assignee and agrees to defend the Assignee' s title and right
in and to the same at the Assignor's sole and exclusive cost and expense.
The parties intend that this Assignment shall vest in the Assignee full ownership ofthe Property,9
and that no othcr document of transfer or assignment shall be required by the parties or any other
~ ~
person . However, should any additional document or action be required ófthe Assignor to vest inthe f >
Assignee ownership ofany ofthe Property , the Assignor agrees to execute and deliver to the Assignee ,
any such document and to take such further action as the Assignee deems necessary in its sole
discretion.
IN WITNESS. WHEREOF, the Assignor has caused this ~nstrument to be executed as ofthe ~
/'Ž~áy of 47~'~*-ó.1,·i ,~-Lc,· -., 1997,»95«Y- .#/f- (Seal)
I 7 ILONA ELY G]~ÜÄDIER

~
The above assignment is hereby agreed to by Grenadier Investment Co:JI,Cá. /7 /7 0/

By: & 'I . ,/>i,~ /'~ylb,**tseall_L
~-
11*a Ely C}r~ddier, Parîàer
PA'-- :
By: <Z~ L (Seal) i
David Grenadier, Panner
!t
,
.
consideration: $280,000.00
DB No.: 14950000
Return to: .l
McGinley, Elsberg A Eutchason
627 S. Washington St.

Alexandria. VA 22314
DEED OF BARGAIN AND SALE
-1
THIS DE:E:D .Rae =Mß entered into this /3~y ©f March, 2000~ among
#Sf#
Ilona Ely c=Rno = ZXR . TXCSTEZ '01 rr,·r,o~nrzz nrvzs·rhrzwr coboxyý , Z,Tn ., a
Virginia gen..ral partnership , ·David GRENADIEP. and Janice WOLK , aka Janice
GRZNADIZZ, Granto:t:(s); »MA. MI:TM-rr.r. ZOZN a ASSOCIATES, INC., a Virginia
corporation, Grantee (s) .
EÊ o,§ RECITALS:
R-1 WHEREAS , Gr- r,- Aier Investment Company , Ltd ., a Virginia general
partnership , is the sole beneficiary of the Deed recorded Sept --ber 10 ,
1987 in Deed Book 1222 at Page 1917, among the land records of the City of
Alexandria, VA.
WITNZSSETH:
i1
THÁT FOR and in consideration cf Tan Dollars ($ 10.00), cuh in hand
paid by the Grantee (:) eo the Gran : or < 5 ), and other good and **lu , hle
consideration , the receipt oí which is hereby acknowledged , nhe Gra:tor ( s )
do hereby B-rgain, Grant, Ssll i:d Convey with GENERAL WAZRAWTY :md
ENGLISH COVENANTS of ticle , unto Mischell Eorn a Associates . Inc ., zhe
following described property v,·izh zh- ippurgsn, nces

thereto belc: eimg in
the Cizy .f Alf.=sndria, Vi=sini,
Lets N·=-bs:*d :---© (2) , Thr.a (3) g.z.3 Pp'Ur (4), 3&(tio= Nrgberad Twc
'·': . c= r-r: Subdivision of DZL Rk-Y, &.s z.hs Zvit Ckpp•.rs duly
Fr=
EXHIBIT
r :
C0
-
-.I...
7
6 i
,
11 1 P qø ó' 2~~ 8
,
;.
11
at Pagi 156 , mm - g
. Deed 3©ok 131
d and recorde,d in
d •dicnt~d . platte ty , Virglnia .
of lrlington Coun
th• land r , cgrd,
. VA
tho City of Al.Kxzndria.
This property iz now located in
at Page 1917
in Deed Book 1222
a property carreyed
And being thi sun
conditions, and
subj ecn to •isements.
1.s made
THIS CONVEYANCZ
affect the
the game may lawfully
insofar is
of record
re:zrictions
property.
·to convey said
have the right
that they
GRANTORCS) covenant
SAID
to encumber the
done no act
that they have
to the Grantee(s) ;
property
the said
have quiet possession 'of
Grantee(s) shall
that the said
same;
will execute such
that : aid Grantor ( s )
free from all encumbrances ;
land ,
as may be requisite.
to the said lAnd
further assurances
Üzld scal (s) :

following sigriature (s)
WITNESS the
Company, Ltd.
Grenadier Investment
general partnership
A Virginia
~- ~-
~~**
üqàßdi.tjlf .u,< &*. 62=1'ÒLF-- 7-- 7
*U <i *·4!2 0
Jt<*,1 ad< €'t-- (7<-
<-=r#)7 /L ) 3
David Grenišie:=
j; 11,£ , k *j*~~0- 1
i. üì:
6*Ul Janice
ktd '., ~v~
Mc· lk
«
'-%
~)
1Í
--
whicb pur=:r:5 to -----
Prcvisicn concained hžrein *CZ Or ------
Any
hc,lüiß..,o.c•-:panr/, .,csrship, re--czl j,eBSS =r crasZ.r c: any . ..Il- - -
--/-'I
on th- tzsi- Qf ric. c.lcx, sex ==liEÌ.=, -nces=ry, nf=ic=fl
1
fimilial 5 ( Rtug , ŽCZ , -
5 :XUKL orientzci.-. .r disabili:y :s -.
.
11 P
1
+ X 1, 0 www.lpl,tmenlf,ndm.com·Vli,gl,Il.i '11.„,ill„ t'~; i., linrr,1:,/:iot,11,~i,Il,to, ~ ,#p ji„n,i,r'., ..itl, nk *e
4.01:~ .*ma,k,
OWDI#S-dl ~Am.tidliliültwa OE=Piell,I~U- IÜ]AI.Ii,0,1•.Vlre,ái 0*næRF-Fa,E* *AOL-(1§70) ~ü-1**1-h,IA mEO ßC.UMW
Southampton Apartments *I... View Nearby Apartment,

$840 - $1,172
Short-Terml · 2 Beds
g)
4118 So,itliway Ln, Tr:a,igle. VA 22172
W upu~'ti . 'KAN' •*t
(703) 634-4149
1 Bed 2 Beds * rotl .i' Vel, 1..' .
2A 808 Sq F' Not Avo,Iable $1.046
2TH ~, 008 Sq Ft Not Av#Iable 11,172
Southampton Ap artrner,t j *.r

V.*vg .-# 'i. .......n-. i' ·
$840 · $1,172 qp
(/0~f, t·1. 1..·'

, O. a 2 O.d,
. t"%
..'.
3 C
/.... 1.'...
, 0#- Twr- t.p,n.,s
Dl'ÎN.·\1.l *,itx
t." '-/•.- ...
Apartments Sq Ft No . Apartments Mthly Rent Mthly Total
2A 808 8 1,046 $ 8,368

2 Townhome 1,008 8 1,172 9,376
1C 900 2 915. 1,830
1A 468 32 840. 26,880
1B 531 16 880. 14,080
EFF 441 2 c. 750 1,500
1 Bdr 648 16 C. 900 14,400 (76,434)
Southan,pton Con,munity U>

t'1-uhc C-
r
.''.'."s, ~,
~ - c'*: (702,2':.üa-
..,
Southampton Apartments *
Addøi**: 41 10 Sou:r¥**y Ln Ti,-f-. VA 22172

Phone: (8;6) *13 l )18
Compound Interest Calculator I The Calculator Site
10/3/2016
Calculation results + *i ÖDÔ l.£6& -iá I26 4- 0*26-

~,~
121 -Ílyjpt ..#FO'L, i
dLL,
(interest compounded daily - added at the end of each day) ttlp *ËL
lílter
Total Interest Balance
Year Year Interest
$3,154.67 $33,154.67
1 $3,154.67
$36.641.08
2 $3,486.41 $6,641.08
$10,494.10 $40,494.10
3 $3,853.02
$14,752.29 $44,752.29
4 $4,258.19
$19,458.25 $49,458.25
5 $4.705.96
$24,659.07 $54,659.07
6 $5,200.82
$30,406.79 $60.406.79
7 $5,747.72
$36,758.91 $66,758.91
8 $6,352.12
$43,779.00 $73,779.00
9 $7,020.09
$51,537.29 $81,537.29
10 $7,758.29
$60,111.40 $90,111.40
11 $8,574.12
$69,587.14 $99,587.14
12 $9,475.74
$110,059.30
13 $10,472.16 $80,059.30
$91,632.67 $121,632.67
14 $11,573.37
$104,423.05 $134,423.05
15 $12,790.38
$118,558.41 $148,558.41
16 $14,135.36
$134,180.19 $164,180.19
17 $15,621.78
$151,444.69 $181,444.69
18 $17,264.50
$170,524.64 $200,524.64
19 $19,079.96
20 $21,086.33 $191,610.97 $221,610.97
$214,914.65 $244,914.65
21 $23,303.67
$240,668.84 $270.668.84
22 $25,754.19
23 $28,462.39 $269,131.23 $299,131.23
24 $31,455.38 $300,586.61 $330,586.61
25 $34,763.09 $335,349.70 $365,349.70
26 $38,418.63 $373,768.33 $403,768.33
i
27 $42,458.57 $416,226.91 $446,226.91
28 $46,923.34 $463,150.25 $493,150.25
29 $51,857.60 $515.007.85 $545,007.85
30 $57,310.73 $572,318.57 $602,318.57
http:#www.thecalculatorsite.com/tinance/calculators/compoundinterestcalculator. php
j W
Case IN,toryl„Iges *.I,*4.iri,u,
F ie r. 0691253 tcìæd. ¥*sflsm Cdv SUDÆ *f:Af ~ E....tl D-SI¥ .- 0

04,11/ZOOZ ** 0'.m«t.* o..
SO+ GRENADER. JIMCE WOLKVS GAENAOER. DAVD MAFK K/,/* Usa S 2
m-004 9*ØC-'*
ÚIA»ME
loqmoo• Ia:I'. oq
Oxk JCME 2
- l, '1 Í lûqm004 ,[*,aion Order
Z @* 2
H/d, CGIL 0,»I// W
1 100S11'M Sutp. C..."va.g'. „* GRENUOÉR. DA«) I#
ICQ,/20* Il„* sd,IIJI C»Oe.
(*úe, Er.,ed K»ch.Wi E
2 @ lali/l,9, BSQI Coipla,l Fi// GREWOZR. jzv,CE Wll
11 +
01.78/2(os Me/*,g
G
Er....
:QOS/lægl /.ct=/ a,/ Wm F*d GAENØOEA,PNICE,a.K CUM/200~ *cnon 0*,
/ EO
Kidi j,ei E
EI"M oockj,1,E
@ l~Ilflm Pla@erm l" 0*' 0*12¢007 **ois Or,
2
Enhi«t WocN . Jon , E
09,199007 V.Iø-ai~ itü,se, ~dif
5 @ 122&/19H vsu'on 0* Efæfed **W.E 40 ~ O
*uddocl Do,/*8 U 2
Err«
G Olnln,00 Oeoee *Aeier™e Dde, Elli'. gecgj,IE 0§91,2007 P,e- S:NMNOO/
Al @ a
C*- öbe Prlstid ~4•w#/„ICN CO,/
P-d 9*** 1312?2007 AFMI~Id Aln Docå*¢
1 02,1<QOOO Saá,5 C•*«a 41 ,
1
E. err' Kloc~ Jol E
E.."./ 12/12#2007 *:M V»w*a~, C*del
@ 011/109 Jl~it,ICIY=110*le $-fiki AYI D 43 @ 0
R.'"wo Dcm Oocte,Megødr-C•C-*
Doc*[
EmM «joxj* E 07,21000* Ae-o- ~ Fem
@ Ol#1&4000 p,æ,i~ Scræe* ooe, U ,
Da'*'u. Notai 8
Ca#:10008 „Iiori DAY
10 OMS,2000 Sihpoeia[).Kes Tec~n-Pro,~ •,ued
Da.*.'ts. UOI."
0*/Z.~.. #*cn. 0.
Oaq]QOOO ***#.. Se,d TIFF/N¥*DCOI##Y *6 F
11
Oa-,S.N- §
10#ll/MOOI j„Iom D•y
CZQSRC 31 Lia- 0 Q (ir»d 0*I 6-,j Hadøo~ D- M
11 5
/OOWZOOS SL®p~ Chdei
Olt)t.000 /.*oea.. Depc... .".. .IKE ~:m 48 6 0
2
C'•*. J-e• C
49 @0 100*2013 Mxi. Oead Chie,
td oneo,O Sc£»oeml # Depcs~ Sen' d DVKE. W#R¥
C]*Ua..SC
2
Era·ed
:1092011 H»oa oerof CI/e,
aiued CR#E.•RY 50 90
15 OM,GOOO WI.ee.I k;r¥*ri:, a.** Ja,M, C 1
Erred
Sl @S 1120"ODD....' De..00..
CGUKE.A¥
@ 0*17£2000 Swtp.Iy#D.po,Ic/ #*
01,14001• $-*me,1 *Fln C»de,
)=ed (13*. Ja,nes C 15
sr,r..'.. /*,1 F
52 @ 0
· 17 0~42COOO De¢M~Úa-4 . PAM *. E,r,Ied WOI , 1 COU , 1 *l Npll !5
4
Enno
53 @S 06414201 $ WOCN Fr*M O/I
ZEWAI,< ê££)¿ CC»*4 1
18 E Soseoe Swtooer. D..' ...%./) *s,Id
OGOS/701$ lei/
Fèel
54 E) /
Kloch kh E 1
1 -ÛO F'nul ccr**Ie Cor™id br Tfd
Erkid *.*.C.* *v~
OGS)5/2015 üi-vm Oei/4 C»*er
55 E *
091(200* Cora pei P,DU:,Yl,=ogli/Il C»úi Er¥æd H//ock. Do"M U
20
Oá'10.* *Ca,$, ). e.'* Hadlock, ~**I
NEEE)+Vdl HELEN COIN

22 Q 054100©o S,b©oeaa Doœs ixim-P**£* Sefid
@ OWCOIO 54'<*'"'po"4 C)*! E..".d KIA Jr. E
Oeom* EQ:i,ab. [k,IO,Zin F./0.z.ee

24
Kloch. W.E
@ Olosqooo Rvl Oecœe E'1"f
/7Æ)/f2000 Pa,n¢fEOde¢ EQ, rd Nloch kkn E
Zl 0747~M@l Sro. C.Ie C*ie, E,1„Id Kl,A jom E
,@.* JdaE
m .&*7'xm 9-- C:m C,1/ Erm,fd
.S 08/*,2001 Rifno-d¢,e=Oick~1 CI„I„Id Fc~¥*=J
C=ned ,de=máe C,f C/g,t

30 1&0#Zvl Rern/*c Ffim DOCUI
*..',.. C, C-t
m =-1 Re,n,edF-n=. S./".- pf,=*1
1e
- ._P-tt.i#å~T~
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA Page 2
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE CÏTY OF ALEXANDRIA

March 2, 2000
39
JANICE WOLK GRENAD[ER Proofof Service
43
M,rçh 9,2000
VS Cl{99 l 253 .- Divd~i Pisoc.pe
46
March 17,2000
DAVID MARK GRENAD[ER Pnec,Pc
49
March 21.2000
ce
Certificate of Servi
TABLE OF CONTENTS
51
NAME OF PAPER I DAlli FILED I NUMBER April 3,2000
Proofof Sc,vi©c
52
Bill of Cornpt,ânt for Divorce October 5. I 999 l April 5,2000
Notice
54
Notice and Motioo October 5,1999 3 April 5,2000
e of-B-itncss
Motion to Compel A[lcndaoc
56
Subpoena in Chanccry October 5.1999 5 April 5,2000
Notice & Motion
65
Pendente Ute Order Odober 13,1999 6 Aprilll,2000
Letter from Colmscl
66
Oc,ober 14, 1999 Il Apfil Il, 2000
Pnecip¢ Atåcodancc o< Witness
Opposition lo Motion tö Compel
77
13 April 12.2000
Prœccipe December 2, 1999
(kdcy: Kotion $0 compel
79
De©cmbu 2.1999 l5 *:vcd on Ap,il 12.2000
Ndcc Ordrn motiam io compel is dcnied. Subpocma
Ms Drakc Is quashcd.
Motion to Establish Visiwion Deccmbü 2.1999 t7 80
April 28.2000
Notice
Visitation O,der Deocrnbcr 28. 1999 19 82
April 28.2000
Mc*ion to Cori,pcl
Decrec of Reference - Lisa B Kcmlcr is :,ppointed as Special Janwg 2 l, MOO 21 84
April 28.2000
Commissioner in Chx,ccry. Motion for Lcâvc io Amend
86
May 4,2000
Stalus Cc,Iference No(ice J=,uary 25' 2000 23 Pi,ecipe
89
kiay $,2000
to Show Cåuse
Notice & Pctiuon for Rule
Praccipe Fcbru,ry 4,2000 24
91
May L 2000
!™, Molion fo, Lcive to Amend
Order Substittlt,ln of cot~*!. Fcb,u@ry 14,2000 25 Dcfcndanl'$ Response to Pìaindf
93
ff'* Motion to Compel May 8.2000
Pretrial Order Fcbnury 14,2000 27 Dctcndant's Response to Plainti
95
May IO, 2000
Pra¢,-ipc Fcbruary 14,2000 28 Ruk to Show Cause
97
May 10,2000
Cooscnt Order Febru:ry 25, MOO 3l Order: motion %0 compel
99
May 10.2000
icaooo of Chld Support
Ànner md Cms:-Bill Febnnry 25,2000 33 Defendant's Pctition for Modif
IOI
May 12.2000
Notioe of Comm;«A„,ler's Hesring Marcb I. 2000 37 P:oor of scr~ice
Page 4
162
tion Schedule October 4 2004
pagc 3 Motìou io Esublish a Set Visita
165
Octobcr 22,2004
Affidavil of Service
166
Mayl 8,2000
104
October 27,2004
praecipe Order visitation schedule
105 161
y', fcc, in the arnowlof May 24,2000 October 27,2004
O,dec plainliffto pjy dcfend~nt's attoroe Uniforrn Pretrial Scheduling Orde
r
$250.00 ui,hin IOdays. 170
107 J/nuary 28,2005
Mzy 26,2000 Custody and Vi:iluion Ords
Praecipe 176
112 April 6,2005
M:y 31,2000 Pr*:cipe
Arfidævit of Service
l Tl
115 Septembcr 5,2007
Msy 31.2000 Pr*cipe
Notice and Motioa
1l7
l?E
June 2, 2000
Seí*cmber 5.2007
Notice 1*rxcipe
ilg 179
June 2.2000 rt Sepurnbcr 5.2007
issioner in Ch:1,rcfy Petilion ror Irxita,c Child Suppo
Reporl of Spccia! Comm
123 lit
July 5,2000 Scptember 19,2007
ANAL DECREEOF DIVORCE 0~ef of Wi#Wrml
/29 1:3
September 21,2007
Ccrlificale
Uniform Pietrial Schedgline Oider
135 l:5
Order: defendant to pay the
complainazl the sum of $522-00
. July 7,2000 October 2.2007
2..000
Ccrtiã calc of Discovcry
which stnll bc paid on of Äfore Augusi
1:7
137
October 2,2007
Jub 17.2001 Requests for Prodi,ction of Documcris
Moüon for I ssuå„ce o f Rulc lo Show Cause
191
139 October 2.2007
July 17.2001 Ccnificáte off)iscovcry
Affidawt
194
141 October 2,2007
July 17.2001
Rule lo Show Cause Irlcrrogatorics
143 216
August 7,2001 October 24.2007
Rutc to Show Cause Certificate of Discovery
145 218
August 14.2001 De©ember l 2,2007
modify is uithdrawn and thc
Proof of Service
Orden complainanl'$ motion lo
12121.'07 doc kci
mæltcý is removed from thc Court's
!45
A•gust 16. 2001
Praecipc 219
149 Support
July 9.2008
Odober 5.200! Nouce of Motion io Modify Child
P,aoci pc 220
150 rl July 9,2008
Alnl ll,2002 Motion to Modify Child Suppo
Order: Aowcause is disrnissel
222
l 52 July 11,2008
Odobcr 12,2004 s by Savicc Other Than by
[A kr from Counsel Affdavit for Return of Proces
'53 Vir:ináa She siff
Ociobcr I Z 2004
Cause
Notioe of Petizion for a Rule to Show
227
July 21,2008
Support
1$1 Re-Notice of Motion 10 Modify Child
Show Causc Ocvbcr 12. 2004
Vcrincd Petition for a Rulc to 263
Sepumbcr 10,2008
Sl®porl
Notice of Motion to Modify Child
151
October l 3.2004
Ordcr 1& a Ruåe lo Show Cm,sc 264
t _ - ._ _ - Scptcrnbcr IO, 200;
Ociobe, t 2.2004 l#__ Motioe to Modih Child Suppor 21
- -
Notice of Cl,Igc or Address
hgcs
Page 6
266
d N~cc of Moti= v Modìb Child Support Seøeœbei IS, 2001 415
~-* Their September 5,2013
st to Intervene to Protect
: 268 The Grcnadier Parlies' Reque
Septembs l S, 200 Oppo sition to Plaintiff's Molion to
Afñdavit of Service Interests and File This
nst Katz & Co
of Doc~nents Filed Agai
: rn Compel the Production
Septcmbcr 26, 200 418
Notice of Heæin: Molkw io Molfy Child Suppo' on Aug 26, September 5.201 3
Defendants Motions Filed
274 Plaintifrs Opposition to
Exhibks ~om October 8,2008 H¢Mie~ 2013

440
351 est io Intervcnc September l 6,2013
Ocwber 9,2008 The Grenadier Parlies Requ
Order of Su?port Plaintiffs Response to tiffs
intere st and Files This Opposition lo Plain
to Protect Their
st
356 The Produ ction of Documcnts filed Again
fuly I?. 201 ; Motion to Corn pel-
Cover Shccl Gor Fiíag Cyil Aclions
Katz & Co
357 446
Subpoena for Prodzftiom oí Docimcr; July 11.201;
oenas seeking October 3.2013
arc denied and thc subp
Ordcr: piaintiíf's motions
]59 are quashed-
Motion for lhe Ci,cuit Cou! Judges Konlcr, Dmtia uxj Jdy Ij.2013 pîoduction of documents
448
Difections of Lzw November 4,2013
Clark to Rmz lh<msehu Follouüi the TRIAL COURT
KUTICE OF APPEAL FROM
Under Viginiæ Suptcmc C=t Rule 17«2- 105(bk Mooon for 449
c bctnecæ Novcmber 4,2013
Propcrîy Settlement Agree™) m k Divo,c
Motion for Waiver of Bond
Plaánxiffand Defcâdw as Defcndart lus Actedl io ã Fnlidulc~ 013 450
November 5,2
Mmog Since Oc;obuof IHS - Ncvv Evüence m Recent Wcek, O,dcr: plaintiffs mdioo
for waiver ofbond is denie
d
Ju,y ~t Chazzc *f
S~po,ts ™*; Modoo Dcmmd Tdil by 452
November 15.2013
Venz by a Judge with Jurisdiction
Reconsideraiâon on Bond
364 460
mg E-Mails Rc©cvcd July M 2013 is denied. November 20,2013
AÎ*hei Aüidßit of Scn ice and Tbtcaten for reconsideration on bond
Order: pla,n,iffs motion
461
July 16' 2013
als of Virginia November 21,2013
of Facts for Court of Appe
g'ort has be¢ú 370 (Proposed) Stætemenl
fy 't,cn Propcr Pap¢T Julv 213013
Nolicc io Co,Æl to Noti
468
January 14; 2014
Filed and h,d:e Chogem ÍM Casc, cut Order: Swement of Facts
405
of Circuit AOM 13,2013
Dcfcndsl'$ Opposition * Motioe b k Rccas,l
r<l ~y Tri,1
Co,It Ju*1, Ax Piopcrty Scttlc=M NFö
na fo,
*,d Chmä ofvcn,c d lo So-fa!1¢d 5#bpoe
Pioduct™ of Doc,ineats-
401
Augœt 19,2013
Reques: for Productioo 0(Documcau ind Things
409
Auiut 19.2013
Noiìcc/lAotioe to Congl
411 herein, are
io', Il t}x Augløl 19,2013 rs listed abovc and filcd
PlaintiffOppoätioo io D:fendaiws Oi,Pesit Coun, ccrtify that the pape
of thc above mcntiõned
1. Edward Semonian, Clerk
Fo#9**€ above styled case.
dos oí the original papers in thc Clerk
l. So·Called -Subpoena foc Produc Tcste: Edward Semonian,
Documents- . Deputy Clerk
1 Motiœ for & Recusai of Circ,it
Cotsl by: 4.,4„b.<.4,/9
Jdges
ent
3- Fo, Pa~p¢rtl Sc„kæest Agreem
4. *ay Tä md Chaa# of Vemx
HAND
DELIVERED
Janice Wolk Grenadier RECEIVED
15 W. Spring Street
202-368-7178 D EC 1 2 2016
December 7, 2016
Virginia State Bar --1<'ZÍZ~ÍlsTArf~. f'L:

1111 East Main Street Suite 700
Richmond Virginia 23219
(804) 775-0570
RE: Links to testimony on December 2, 2016 to Virginia Legislature
Dear Members,
On December 2, 2016 I delivered to the VSB the information on the Criminal Activity of many in the
Judiciary of the State of Virginia.
The main complaint is the Criminal Spree and the back up documentation of Divorce Lawyer Ilona Ely
Grenadier Heckman. The others listed have acts and actions were to Cover Up her crimes.
The following links are from the Testimony to the legislature and other parts will be uploaded on to
you tube in the days to come.
The following links will take you to the recorded testimony: December 2,2016
• JIRC https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NapE1 NFROYI<&t=Ss
• Judge Johnston https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vmtaDPQ_w2A
• Judge Parker for Sally Minetree https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GvSeBt3WxU
• Judge Appeals Court VA https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eYSNHLLOFbO
Please contact me with any further questions you may have.
Thankyou for yo t me and lo g into these acts and actions of many.
rmly,
Janice W Grenadier
Ülù 6*KA da.
t
C'7 U.S. POSTAGE

~
g
PAID
FN ALEXANORIA, VA
t S 0 *í kó 9*- 22320
D EC 07 16
*...„WC,Í.
WN, rEOS...
ÁMOLJNT
hì UX \/A 61 S¿ *Ol lûOO

23219 $0.47
R2304E1 06332-08
Nij VS /Ò-
Il i c. /ÌW kji©<31
~YU-3~ 790
h ìòh *Ad \/í ü 3@-/3
-jz 1 =t :_1 W Z C :' = lilli,il, 'll" lll,Illl;,l j"lili, Jll, illl" ll, ll' li'Illl' J, l, Jl jl
From: JW Grenadier <jwgrenadier@gmail.com>
Sent: Sunday, April 9, 2017 1:45 PM
To: Davis, Ned <Davis@vsb.org>; McCauley, Jim <mccauley@vsb.org>; doris@cvlas.org; intakereb
<intakereb@vsb.org>
Subject: Re: Complaint Filed against Divorce Lawyer Ilona Grenadier Heckman and her gang of lawyers /
Judges
Dear Mr. Davis,
I hope you are having a wonderful holy season.
I wanted to know if you needed any other documents - such as

the ones that Ilona lied in court with - and or her lawyers lied in
court. I also have the back up to show that she knew she was
lying and the documentation of the "TRUTH".
Please let me know what you need.
Warmly,
JW Grenadier
AND NOW THESE THREE REMAIN:

Faith, Hope and Love
BUT THE GREATEST OF THESE IS LOVE
1 Corinthians 13:13
On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 8:18 AM, JW Grenadier <jwgrenadier@gmail.com> wrote:
Good Morning,
Thank you, I have at least anough 200 or more documents against her and the other lawyers - showing
the collussion with the Judges - lawyers not showing up in court, all my discovery denied - the police
called on me and Ilona lying to the police.
Thank you - and let me know what else u need from me.
Warmly,
On Apr 4, 2017 7:10 AM, "Davis, Ned" <Davis@vsb.org> wrote:

I have reviewed the 212 pages of materials you sent this past December and viewed some, but not all, of
the videos at the links you sent.
I will correspond with you before the end of the week.

Sent with Good (www.good.com)
-----Original Message-----
From: JW Grenadier [jwgrenadier@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, March 31, 2017 06:09 PM Eastern Standard Time
To: Davis, Ned; doris@cvlas.org
Judges
Mr. Davis,
There is an error on Page 1, The date February 14, 2016 should

be February 14, 1985.
I wanted to see if you did anything today before I agreed not to

include Ms. Causey in the e-mails.
She would not have been included if you had done your
job. But, you cover up for lawyers with money and power. My
complaint was field 4 months ago and you haven't looked at
it. While other lawyers who don't have the Power of past VSB
aka past President Ben DiMuro to be sure you look the other
way -
The professional code of ethics states clearly that if you are a

lawyer you must report. Yet lawyers aren't doing that. The VSB
by all appearance are ignoring there own rules for personal or
VSB financial gain or gifts.
By ignoring my past complaints you have created the
appearance of an Enterprise of corruption.
I am sorry you feel Ms. Causey should not be included in these

e-mails but, the laws and rules of professional conduct are
clear. She is now aware of the bad behavior - and that can not
be reversed.
Again I received no update which means the complaint is sitting
idly by.
Warmly,
jw
JW Grenadier
www.JAMJustice.org
www.Seeit-Tellit.com
www.mypillowpack.com
1 Corinthians 13:13
On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 10:02 AM, Davis, Ned <Davis@vsb.org> wrote:
Dear Ms. Grenadier,
I will try to work this today.
I understand that the Client Protection Fund is sending you an application pursuant to your request.
On another matter, this is to politely request that you cease copying VSB President-elect Doris Causey
on your messages. As President- elect, she serves as an officer of the bar having general administrative
authority over the operations of the bar. Her position is primarily policy oriented. The officers of the
bar are not involved in the review, investigation or disposition of disciplinary complaints. Because of
confidentiality, they do not have access to complaints or the names of attorneys involved. Bar counsel
may furnish confidential information to the officers under limited circumstances if bar counsel
determines that there is an need to do so. Otherwise, the officers do not have access to confidential
information. Additionally, they do not have the authority to review, reverse or amend the
determinations of the bar counsel on a disciplinary complaint.
Again, I will review your complaint and contact you.
From: JW Grenadier [mailto:jwgrenadier@gmail.com]

Sent: Friday, March 31, 2017 8:06 AM
To: Davis, Ned <Davis@vsb.org>; doris@cvlas.org
Judges
Is today the day someone can give me an update on my

complaint and which lawyers you are looking at - so I can
update it with other lawyers that are involved in the Cover Up
of the Criminal Spree of Divorce Lawyer Ilona Ely Freedman
Grenadier Heckman
Warmly,
jw
JW Grenadier
www.JAMJustice.org
1 Corinthians 13:13
On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 12:23 PM, JW Grenadier <jwgrenadier@gmail.com> wrote:
Please send me the information on the legal fund - for when

lawyers steal - Ilona has stolen close to if not more than $20
Million through the criminal scheme that stated with Judge
Albert Grenadier's mother with the forgery of her signature on
a trust agreement that Ilona ran out of her law office. She did
this with knowledgeable intend having helped other clients
steal from there families. These acts and actions have been
supported by the VSB and many Judges.
The appearance is you are now once again as you did in the
past - ignoring the criminal activity amongst your members of
power.
If I understand your e-mails correctly you have ignored my

complaint of December 2, 2017?
Warmly,
jw
JW Grenadier
www.JAMJustice.org

1 Corinthians 13:13
On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 8:05 AM, Davis, Ned <Davis@vsb.org> wrote:
Yes. I have several meetings today too but will try to get to this.
Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2017 04:38 PM Eastern Standard Time

Judges
Mr Davis,
Please confirm you have the complaint and all the EXHIBITs /
Evidence that was dropped off with it.
Thank you,
jw
JW Grenadier
www.JAMJustice.org
1 Corinthians 13:13
On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 12:20 PM, JW Grenadier <jwgrenadier@gmail.com> wrote:
Mr. Davis,
I want to understand the system in the VSB. You are the person
then that should be able to give me the update on the status of
my complaint - Which of the attorneys you are investigating so I
know which ones I need to add complaints and more direct
information about. Is this correct?
Warmly,
JW Grenadier
www.JAMJustice.org
1 Corinthians 13:13
On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 6:59 AM, Davis, Ned <Davis@vsb.org> wrote:
I had other business come up yesterday and have meetings this morning but will try again to get to this
today.
Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2017 06:18 PM Eastern Standard Time

Judges
Mr. Davis -
I have kept an eye on my eye mail all day. Please update me on

the complaint or who I need to call to find out the status and
what other information will be needed. As it was a complaint
that included many - I need to know who is being looked in
collusion to Cover Up so - If I need to file other complaints. For
the last 7 - 8 years I have been following who looses a license
and the information needed to hold accountable a lawyer.
Ilona has stolen, converted real estate et al of $20 Million

Dollars and by all appearance with her involvement in the
forgery of a trust agreement that she used to steal money and
real estate from as well as her using lawyers not licensed in
Virginia - the list goes on and on and on.
Please up date me.
Thank you,
Warmly,
jw
JW Grenadier
www.JAMJustice.org
1 Corinthians 13:13
On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 10:58 AM, JW Grenadier <jwgrenadier@gmail.com> wrote:
Thank you Mr. Davis,
I will keep an eye on my e-mail.
Warmly,
jw
JW Grenadier
www.JAMJustice.org
1 Corinthians 13:13
On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 9:33 AM, Davis, Ned <Davis@vsb.org> wrote:
Dear Ms. Grenadier,
I will contact you about this later today.

Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2017 9:22 AM
To: Davis, Ned <Davis@vsb.org>; doris@cvlas.org; McCauley, Jim <mccauley@vsb.org>
Cc: intakereb <intakereb@vsb.org>
Judges
Good Morning all,
I am having a difficult time finding the status of my Complaint

as of December 2, 2016. I have a stamped copy of it being
accepted at the front desk. You keep giving me information on
where to send a complaint but, not where to find the status of
the complaint and where the other information mailed in to
add to the complaint went.
Please just give me the name and phone number of the person
I should contact.
Warmly,
JW Grenadier
www.JAMJustice.org
1 Corinthians 13:13
On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 11:37 AM, JW Grenadier <jwgrenadier@gmail.com> wrote:
Mr. Davis,
As you can see on December 2, 2017 I delivered a complaint. I
am asking who I speak to - to find out what acts and actions in
investigating has taken place. Or has this complaint been
Covered UP?
As the past one was.
Warmly,
jw
JW Grenadier
www.JAMJustice.org
1 Corinthians 13:13
On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 10:28 AM, Davis, Ned <Davis@vsb.org> wrote:
Dear Ms. Grenadier:
If you wish to send a complaint by email, the address is: intakereb@vsb.org.

Sent: Monday, March 27, 2017 10:22 AM
To: McCauley, Jim <mccauley@vsb.org>
Cc: doris@cvlas.org; Davis, Ned <Davis@vsb.org>
Judges
Can you please give me the name of the person that I need to
contact.
Thank you
Janice
JW Grenadier
www.JAMJustice.org
1 Corinthians 13:13
On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 12:59 PM, JW Grenadier <jwgrenadier@gmail.com> wrote:
Can you please give me the name of the person that I need to
contact.
Thank you
Janice
JW Grenadier
www.JAMJustice.org
1 Corinthians 13:13
On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 12:37 PM, McCauley, Jim <mccauley@vsb.org> wrote:
OK. I thought you sent emailed the complaint. But, as I said earlier, my office does not handle
disciplinary complaints. That falls within Bar Counsel's purview. I do not have any information to give
you.
Sent: Saturday, March 25, 2017 10:49 AM Eastern Standard Time

To: McCauley, Jim; doris@cvlas.org
Cc: Davis, Ned
Judges
Mr. McCauley,
I didn't mail it in. I mail in the extra information, I had delivered
it. Please find just the introduction letter. It was has prior to
my delivering it as I discussed on the phone with you - hard to
put it all in order and all those involved in the COVER UP of
Divorce Lawyer Ilona Grenadier Heckman's Criminal spree that
started in her law firm that the documents show in or around
November of 1983 with the forgery of Sonia Grenadiers
signature on a trust agreement that she started stealing out of
the trust through her law firm. Ignored by the VSB. With Ben
DiMuro doing all he cans with his law firm to cover up her
criminal acts has acted in collusion lying in court and lying in
court documents.
Having watched all of you take several other attorney's licenses

for years for the exact less criminal activity of these two and
others I filed another complaint. I have since then mailed in
other information to add to it. I have yet to hear where it
stands in the VSB.
If it needs to be re-filed - I will re-file it but, I would like to hear

what has happened to letter and EXHIBITS.
Thank you,
Warmly,
JW Grenadier
www.JAMJustice.org
1 Corinthians 13:13
On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 2:53 PM, McCauley, Jim <mccauley@vsb.org> wrote:
Just so you know, I have checked my inbox, junk and spam folders and cannot see any material from you
referred to in your message. Ned Davis reviewed a similar complaint seven years ago. He suggested that
you send your information to intakereb@vsb.org
I'm sorry for the inconvenience.

Sent: Friday, March 24, 2017 01:25 PM Eastern Standard Time
To: doris@cvias.org; McCauley, Jim; davis@vsb.com
Subject: Complaint Filed against Divorce Lawyer Ilona Grenadier Heckman and her gang of lawyers /
Judges
Dear Mr. McCauley,
I have filed a complaint with you as discussed first on the

phone. I then followed up with other evidence. I would like an
update as to where it stands and which Lawyers are being
investigated as I need to file additional complaints if the
appropriate investigation is not taking place.
I have reached out to the Virginia State Bar President and have
included her in this e-mail.
Warmly,
JW Grenadier
www.JAMJustice.org
1 Corinthians 13:13
From: ProSe America <proseamerica@gmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, May 4, 2017 9:02 AM
To: jwgvbias@gmail.com
Cc: Mark Levine <mark@radioinsidescoop.com>; Dave Albo <dave@davealbo.com>;
DelLAdams@house.virginia.gov; DelLAird@house.virginia.gov; DelDAlbo@house.virginia.gov;
DelRAnderson@house.virginia.gov; DelTAustin@house.virginia.gov; DelLBagby@house.virginia.gov;
DelJBell@house.virginia.gov; DelDBell@house.virginia.gov; DelRBell@house.virginia.gov;
DelRBloxom@house.virginia.gov; deljbourne@house.virginia.gov; DelJBoysko@house.virginia.gov;
DelDBulova@house.virginia.gov; DelKByron@house.virginia.gov; DelJCampbell@house.virginia.gov;
DelBCarr@house.virginia.gov; DelBCline@house.virginia.gov; DelMCole@house.virginia.gov;
DelCCollins@house.virginia.gov; DelKCox@house.virginia.gov; DelGDavis@house.virginia.gov;
DelMDudenhefer@house.virginia.gov; DelJEdmunds@house.virginia.gov;
DelMFariss@house.virginia.gov; DelPFarrell@house.virginia.gov; DelEFiller-Corn@house.virginia.gov;
DelBFowler@house.virginia.gov; DelNFreitas@house.virginia.gov; DelRDance@house.virginia.gov,
DelRIngram@house.virginia.gov <DelRIngram@house.virginia.gov>, DelSGarrett@house.virginia.gov
<DelSGarrett@house.virginia.gov>, DelSIaquinto@house.virginia.gov
<DelSIaquinto@house.virginia.gov>, DelTGear@house.virginia.gov <DelTGear@house.virginia.gov>,
DelTGilbert@house.virginia.gov <DelTGilbert@house.virginia.gov>, DelTGreason@house.virginia.gov
<DelTGreason@house.virginia.gov>, DelTHugo@house.virginia.gov <DelTHugo@house.virginia.gov>,
DelTKilgore@house.virginia.gov <DelTKil <DelSGarrett@house.virginia.gov>;
DelRDance@house.virginia.gov, DelRIngram@house.virginia.gov <DelRIngram@house.virginia.gov>,
DelSGarrett@house.virginia.gov <DelSGarrett@house.virginia.gov>, DelSIaquinto@house.virginia.gov
DelTKilgore@house.virginia.gov <DelTKil <DelTGilbert@house.virginia.gov>;
DelTKilgore@house.virginia.gov <DelTKil <DelTGreason@house.virginia.gov>;
DelGHabeeb@house.virginia.gov; delchayes@house.virginia.gov; DelCHead@house.virginia.gov;
DelGHelsel@house.virginia.gov; DelSHeretick@house.virginia.gov; DelCHerring@house.virginia.gov;
DelDHester@house.virginia.gov; DelKHodges@house.virginia.gov; DelRHolcomb@house.virginia.gov;
DelPHope@house.virginia.gov; DelWHowell@house.virginia.gov; DelRDance@house.virginia.gov,
DelTKilgore@house.virginia.gov <DelTKil <DelTHugo@house.virginia.gov>;
DelTKilgore@house.virginia.gov <DelTKil <DelRIngram@house.virginia.gov>;
DelMJames@house.virginia.gov; DelCJones@house.virginia.gov; DelMKeam@house.virginia.gov;
DelTKilgore@house.virginia.gov <DelTKil <DelTKilgore@house.virginia.gov>;
DelBKnight@house.virginia.gov; DelKKory@house.virginia.gov; DelPKrizek@house.virginia.gov;
DelSLandes@house.virginia.gov; DelDLaRock@house.virginia.gov; DelJLeftwich@house.virginia.gov;
DelJLeMunyon@house.virginia.gov; Mark Levine <DelMLevine@house.virginia.gov>;
DelJLindsey@house.virginia.gov; DelSLingamfelter@house.virginia.gov; DelALopez@house.virginia.gov;
DelMLoupassi@house.virginia.gov; DelDMarshall@house.virginia.gov;
DelBMarshall@house.virginia.gov; DelJMassie@house.virginia.gov; DelDMcQuinn@house.virginia.gov;
DelJMiller@house.virginia.gov; DelRMinchew@house.virginia.gov; DelJMiyares@house.virginia.gov;
DelJMorefield@house.virginia.gov; DelRMorris@house.virginia.gov; delmmullin@house.virginia.gov;
DelKMurphy@house.virginia.gov; DelJOBannon@house.virginia.gov; delioquinn@house.virginia.gov;
DelBOrrock@house.virginia.gov; DelCPeace@house.virginia.gov; DelTPillion@house.virginia.gov;
DelKPlum@house.virginia.gov; DelBPogge@house.virginia.gov; DelCPoindexter@house.virginia.gov;
DelMPrice@house.virginia.gov; DelMRansone@house.virginia.gov; Delegate Sam Rasoul
<DelSRasoul@house.virginia.gov>; DelRRobinson@house.virginia.gov; DelNRush@house.virginia.gov;
DelMSickles@house.virginia.gov; DelMSimon@house.virginia.gov; DelCStolle@house.virginia.gov;
DelRSullivan@house.virginia.gov; DelLTorian@house.virginia.gov; DelDToscano@house.virginia.gov;
DelRTyler@house.virginia.gov; DelRVillanueva@house.virginia.gov; Delegate Jeion Ward
<DelJWard@house.virginia.gov>; DelLWare@house.virginia.gov; DelVWatts@house.virginia.gov;
DelMWebert@house.virginia.gov; DelTWilt@house.virginia.gov; DelTWright@house.virginia.gov;
DelDYancey@house.virginia.gov; DelJYost@house.virginia.gov; district39@senate.virginia.gov;
district13@senate.virginia.gov; district40@senate.virginia.gov; district38@senate.virginia.gov;
district25@senate.virginia.gov; district08@senate.virginia.gov; district12@senate.virginia.gov; district30
<district30@senate.virginia.gov>; district21@senate.virginia.gov; district31@senate.virginia.gov;
district27@senate.virginia.gov; district07@senate.virginia.gov; district33@senate.virginia.gov; intakereb
<intakereb@vsb.org>; doris@cvlas.org; McCauley, Jim <mccauley@vsb.org>; Davis, Ned
<Davis@vsb.org>; Brian.Moran@governor.va.gov; bryan.porter@alexandriava.gov; Allison Silberberg
<allison.silberberg@alexandriava.gov>; jkloch@juridicalsolutions.com;
asimpson@juridicalsolutions.com; jmcgrath@juridicalsolutions.com; lisa.kemler@alexandriava.com; jim
clark <james.clark@alexandriava.gov>; James Banks <James.Banks@alexandriava.gov>;
info@juridicalsolutions.com; Chicago FBI <chicago@ic.fbi.gov>; FBI- ( ( <civilrights.cv@ic.fbi.gov>;
Federal Bureau of Investigation <fbi@service.govdelivery.com>; marcusr@washpost.com;
wilsons@washpost.com; steven@markfordelegate.com; whistleblower@judiciary-rep.senate.gov;
whawkins@courts.state.va.us; whitej@washpost.com; Full Measure with Sharyl Attkisson
<fullmeasurenews@gmail.com>; Cook County States Attorney <statesattorney@cookcountyil.gov>;
doj@thegazette.southam.ca; wsj.lts@wsj.com; Elizabeth.a.vargas@abc.com;
elizabeth.vargas@abc.com; ABA Commission On Racial and Ethnic Diversity In the Profession
<diversitycommission@americanbar.org>; abcboozer@verizon.net; 60m Cbs News
<60m@cbsnews.com>; FoxFriends <friends@foxnews.com>; Shawnette.Wilson@foxtv.com;
aclu@aclu.org; Eric Blair <activistpost@gmail.com>; ACLU of Illinois <acluofillinois@aclu-il.org>;
ackmedtdt1 <wbagwell@verizon.net>; Adrienne Miranda <ad1543@hotmail.com>;
AElliot@courts.state.va.us; aeroberts@ci.richmond.va.us; aerosenb@vbgov.com;
afoster@courts.state.va.us; Aging Contact (Aging) <contact_aging@aging.senate.gov>;
agleckel@beankinney.com; JL Buzz Aguirre <cotoblogzz@gmail.com>; Alan Heavens
<aheavens@phillynews.com>; aharman@vafamilylaw.com; rbank@ainbanklaw.com;
dfeldman@ainbanklaw.com; lshea@ainbanklaw.com; AJCANADA@vbgov.com; ajackins@seyfarth.com;
Armin Kuder <AKuder@ksflaw.com>; Alexis Krell <akrell@thenewstribune.com>; don bailey
<attorneydonbailey@gmail.com>; bblevins@courts.state.va.us; bbaird@cov.com;
bchappell@courts.state.va.us; Bob Cronkleton <bcronkleton@kcstar.com>; bdavis@courts.state.va.us;
BDecatur@courts.state.va.us; bdimuro@dimuro.com; Ron Bonfilio <ronjoebon@gmail.com>; Isidoro
Rodriguez <business@isidororodriguez.com>; ISBA Main Discussion Group <isba@list.isba.org>; E.
Johnson <heliz5406@gmail.com>; Katherine Hine <kshine@wljaradio.net>; Mark Young
<markyoung12@yahoo.com>; alexandria@connectionnewspaper.com; andrew@eagleviewdc.com;
editor@connectionnewspaper.com; editor@washintonexaminer.com;
gazette@connectionnewspapers.com; kpeifer@mediageneral.com; lawyers@luxlaw.com;
letters@styleweekley.com; letters@timesdispatch.com; local@washintonexaminer.com;
metrobiz@timesdispatch.com; news@timesdispatch.com; reston@connectionnewspaper.com;
support@alextimes.com; alan.cooper@valawyersmedia.com; deborah.elkins@valawyersmedia.com;
dstone@fairfaxtimes.com; editor@valawyersmedia.com; info@jewishpolicycenter.org; Jenna Marie
Bostock <jennamariebostock@gmail.com>; mclean@connectionnewspapers.com;
peter.vieth@valawyersmedia.com; sarah.rodriquez@valawyersmedia.com; Washingtonian Magazine
<editorial@washingtonian.com>
Subject: * Law Day 2017 "We The People" Breakfast, Lunch, Dinner & Weekend Getaway Buys Your
Judge
Importance: Low
Good Morning Everyone.
Murder and Suicide the way Virginia does business, has to

change. The Slippery Slope started with the Criminal Spree of
Divorce Lawyer Ilona Grenadier Heckman in November of 1983
and has continued through today.
As disgusting as she and her son David Grenadier is - all of you

on here in this e-mail has worked to Cover it up. Indirectly or
directly ignoring your Professional Code of Ethics. Your Oath of
Office. But, the media, the Federal Government, Department
of Justice and having Bob Goodlatte in charge of the House
Judiciary doesn't hurt. Along with the ownership of James
Comey FBI aka adjunct professor and given several awards by
the Richmond Law School which many of you have a
relationship with.
I am going Nationally with the corruption - When people say

Virginia they are going to say - oh they are big on "Murder for
Hire", Bullying people till they commit "Suicide", There Judges
are empowered by the Supreme Court of Virginia, the JIRC, the
VSB and the Courts of Justice.
As stated in the talk on Law Day 2017 Please take a moment

and watch: https://youtu.be/gskC0LDNf-8
You can read more at VALaw2010.Blogspot.com and

ProSeAmerica.Blogspot.com
This is a National Problem
Warmly,
JW Grenadier
ProSeAmerica@gmail.com
Facebook.com/ProSeAmerica
@ProSeAm
202-368-7178
The Faces of the Murdered / Suicide and Survivor’s
The Many Victims of No Pictures of
Michael Gardner
John Doe
The Young Girls
Molested who
And
Stood Up Dr. Robert Rixse
After having a Hit Man RIP
Hired to take them out Murder for Hire
Chris Mackney *Janice Wolk Grenadier *Ruth Ann Lodato *Ron Kirby *Nancy Dunning *Megan Owen Barry
Still Fighting & Needs HELP
Murder for Hire and Questionable Suicide’s in the City of Alexandria and Northern Virginia
This puts together several known facts – through the life of Janice Wolk Grenadier and different News articles and book facts from
“Bullied to Death” the Chris Mackney story, Edited and Published by FamilyCourt.com, INC attorney Michelle McDonald, written by: Mike
Volpe. That the obvious is being covered up by the FBI, the Judiciary, the Government and Elected Officials who are using there personal
“POWER and FINANCIAL POWER” to illuminate those that they find annoying or whom may get in their way through Murder for Hire or
Questionable Suicides, illegal jailing that when put together it shows a pattern and practice of the “Old Boys Network” in the State of
Virginia.
Pete Scamardo in 1968 hired a hit man Charles Harrelson to kill his child hood friend Sam Delegia Jr, which brings the question
was the idea of how to get rid of your spouse / or other brought to the Old Boys Network in the 70’s by Pete Scamardo as the hits known begain
in or around 1984 with Dr. Rixsey. That by the 1990’s in two Commercial / Land Development Association known Nationwide with
headquarters in the City of Alexandria Pete Scamardo was President, Chairman on the boards as an active citizen – hiding his true idenity and
past criminal history from the locals. This started to unravel, to be exposed through the divorce of his daughter to Chris Mackney who would
take his own life in December of 2013 from the bullying of Pete Scamardo, his attorneys whom he paid handsomly and Judge Bellows who
today is the Judge for Charles Severance. That Judge Bellows by all apperance in the news and record has disallowed any negative information
or truth on the spouses / third parties or issues the victims may have been having with others prior to opening their front doors in the City of
Alexandria and being MURDERED.
That where Janice Wolk Grenadier live’s in a circle around Janice thier have been 5 known Murder type hits – Dr. Rixsey, John Doe, Nancy
Dunning ( which you will read came to Janice’s home twice to check on Janice, now believed Nancy knew more and was from what Nancy said
afraid of what could happen and maybe knew what was going to happen to her) Ron Kirby and Ruth Ann Lodato. That all five have strong
connections to the Old Boys Network.
July 1. 1984 Who shot Dr. Robert Rixse / Murdered for opening his front door. We know who hired the killer – the boyfriend of his x-wife.
But what is the evidence of who shot him? Did the bullets that killed Dr. Rixse in 1984 match the bullets of Nancy Dunning and others? Where
they tested? The story the police released was the murderer with no evidence was a man floating in the Potomac dead whom had Mafia ties.
Easy for the City of Alexandria police and the FBI as they consider this murder solved.
We then have unknown date and name of John Doe Murdered for opening his front door in the City of Alexandria, also connected to the Old
Boys Network and Murdered, whom has received no real press that can be found.
Then on or around September 3rd of 1997 that on an unexpected cab ride to the airport as Janice’s x-husband David Grenadier (son of the late
Judge Albert Grenadier and step-son of Divorce Lawyer Ilona Ely Freedman Grenadier Heckman of Greanadier Anderson Starace Duffett and
Kieser) as he was suppose to take Janice to the airport and was late, Janice was outside waiting and not in her home. Janice’s x-hsuband as
Janice had called him to find out where he was – started yelling at her and saying a cab was on the way. Janice can persume now his
disappointment the money it appears he and Ilona spent to have Janice killed has come back to haunt them. When Janice got in the cab and the
driver could hear David yelling he said to Janice hang up the phone, hang up the phone if you don’t hang up the phone I will pull over and hang
it up for you. Janice hung up the phone, the driver than said we can take care of that for $5,000.00 – you don’t have it – then $2,000 we can
work it out. Janice was handed a phone number, Janice tossed it in the trash can thinking it had been a set up – Janice now believes with out
question it was to be a hit and today she was to be dead. Janice has never been questioned by the City of Alexandria Police or the FBI even
though she has reached out several times with her information.through Commonwealth Attorney Brian Porter & Sheriiff Lawhorene (who had
her tourtured in jail)That in February / March of 1998 Nancy Dunning who would open her front door in 2003 came to Janice on different
occations to check on her safty. The question know arrises was she aware of the outcome that was meant for Janice in September of 1997.
November 1997 That Lawyer Ilona in collusion with David Grenadier, Andrea Grenadier, Robin Grenadier passed a rumor around that caused
David Grenadier to pull a gun in the home with Janice’s girls in the home.
1
February 2003 the Suicide of Megan Owen Barry wife of Fairfax County Sheriff Stan G. Barry – The Washington Post reported that at 12:30
am Sheriff Barry had stepped out and when he came back his wife had committed suicide. The Blue Wall calls this a Murder, but of course no
investigation.
December 2003 the Murder of Nancy Dunning wife of City of Alexandria Sheriff James Dunning – never questioned “oops” say the Police
when Dunning dies in South Carolina a few days after Janice Wolk Grenadier on the radio questions the investigation or lack of investigation
into the Murder.
March of 2011 – City of Alexandria police, Fire and Ambulance come to the home of Janice Wolk Grenadier while she is on travel – she is
supposedly “DEAD” in the home? There is no record of this in the City of Alexandria. Two neighbors have confirmed this with Janice and
the one who convinced the police to not hack down her door but to allow him to open it with the key he had. It was not till June of 2011 when
Janice’s neighbor shared this with her she became aware of it. When researched thier is no record yet two other neighbors have confirmed this.
December 2011 / February 2012 – Deliberate tampering with knowledgeable intend of the Grand Jury by Judge Potter and Commonwealth
October 2012 – Janice’s documents submitted into the record, when she went to check that they had been filed – she is told to take them or they
would throw them out, Janice refused to take them and then they are mailed back to her by Judge’s Kemler, Dawkins and Clark. The box about
4” thick has been x-rayed and shows the documents but, never opened still In the box
December / January time frame of 2012 & 2013 Lawyer Ilona in collusion with others as a favor or hired a gentleman that goes
by the name of Mark Stuart who informs Janice he was to drug Janice and get sexual inappropriate pictures of Janice, or to rape one of Janice’s
daughters, or to plant drugs on Janice’s daughter or in the home to give Circuit Court Judge’s Kemler, Dawkins and Clark, information to make
JWG incompetent to file any other documents. Mr. Stuart said the Lawyer Ilona will go to any length to harm Janice or Janice’s daughters. That
Lawyer Ilona will continue to do what she can to distract Janice from becoming successful and moving on with Janice’s life. That Lawyer Ilona is a
“Greedy Jew” that all Lawyer Ilona’s actions are deliberate to cause harm to Janice. When the Alexandria Police were called they informed
Janice they were instructed by Commonwealth Attorney Randy Sengel to not take any reports of issue.
November of 2013 the Murder of Ron Kirby – Opening his front door – Shot and Murdered.
December of 2013 – Ilona Grenadier Heckman and Presidential Candidate Loretta Lax Miller do a “HATE OF CATHOLICS, CHRISTIONS et al”
Blog – jwgrenadierisalair.blogspot.com taken down while Janice is in jail.
February 18, 2014 - FBI cautions residents of public corruption in Va. - http://www.wusa9.com/story/news/local/2014/02/18/fbi-cautions-residents-of-public-
corruption-in-northern-virginia/5585877/ WASHINGTON (WUSA) -- The Federal Bureau of Investigation's (FBI) Washington Field Office is looking to identify any public corruption occurring in Northern Virginia.
The FBI says public corruption can occur "when a public official, at any level of government – local, state or federal – does any official act in exchange for money, or other free goods or services, for private gain. Public
corruption could also include public employees who take something of value for their own personal gain, thereby violating the public's trust." The FBI says many of their investigations into public corruption start once they
receive a tip from someone. If you want to help identify potential criminal activity, the Washington Field Office has set up a Northern Virginia Public Corruption Hotline at 703-686-6225 and you can also e-mail them at
NOVAPC@ic.fbi.gov.
Some of the examples of corruption include:
Government officials such as DMV employees, city inspectors, taxing or zoning assessors or other regulatory agency employees, or even town councils or mayors;
Contracting officials at all levels, including those who manage government contracts or regulatory permits; or, school resource officers who manage school accounts;
2
Local officials colluding with real estate investors to rig the bidding process at foreclosure auctions;
A person representing the judicial branch - a judge, member of the jury or court personnel; or,
A person representing law enforcement, who steals drugs from criminals, embezzles government funds, falsifies records or smuggles contraband
The FBI has now refused to investigate Clinton’s emails after the following:
Comey tells the press he has prosecuted many for less and sent them to jail
Loretta Lynch then meets with Clinton privately in her private plan
It is reported that Clinton threatened Lynch with her life if it didn’t go away
Comey two days after the meeting in the plan reports that Clinton had “no intent it was only carelessness” did not thing she should be charged with any criminal intend
On or around October 26, 2016 the case is re-opened
February 2014 the Murder of Ruth Ann Lodato for opening her front door, daughter of Judge Giammittorio & sister to Judge Bob Giammittorio

Justices- Chief Judge Cynthia Kinser and
Justice Leroy Millette Jr. resigning, Judge
Randy Sengel retires at a young age. The Old
benefits - by all appearance as a “Thank you”
for hiding the Murder by Hire and Suicides
October 11, 2014 – Breaking news Senator Mark Warner and aid to Governor Terry McAuliffe guilty and admit to offering a Federal
Judgeship to daughter of Phil Puckett
October 14, 2014 – Janice exposes on Blog VaLaw2010.blogspot.com information of corruption by Senator Warner
October 22, 2014 – November 12, 2014 – 22 days Janice illegally jailed and tortured in the City of Alexandria, Solitaire Confinement till 5pm
on Election day Tuesday, November 4, 2014. Illegally Jailed to: 1. Silence her and stop exposure of e-mails between herself and Mark Warner’s
office on the corruption in the Judiciary. Janice went to Mark Warner for help instead he had her jailed, at the same time it was exposed his “Pay
to Play” with a Federal Judgeship for a favor. Being ignored by the Senate Ethics Committee. 2. To Bully / scare her into either committing
Suicide or to turning the other check of the corruption and not holding Virginia and the Federal Judiciary, the Government and Elected Officials
accountable, as well as the criminal acts and actions of the Old Boys Network in Virginia
That the law is very clear: That Judge Clarks actions have turned back time. Giving me less rights then a slave. Taking someone under Title 42
US Code 1994 and Title 18 US Code 1581(a): Whoever holds or returns any person to a condition of PEONAGE, shall be fined under this title
for imprisoned not more than 20 years or both. That on October 22, 2014 I was placed in jail for failure to pay legal fees in 30 days which is a
violation of my Thirteenth Amendment "Neither Slavery not involuntary servitude, except as punishment for a crime where of the party shall
have duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any subject to their Jurisdiction". Furthermore the right by placing me "under" a
state Peonage / Involuntary Servitude violating the Fourth Amendment right by malicious prosecution, false imprisonment and unconstitutional
arrest. This violation of my Eight Amendment Right as to Excessive Bail which in this case constitutes "Restitution Bail" which further shows
the knowledgeable malicious intent to silence me till the election was over on November 4th. 2014. Bias, Retaliation and Retribution to further
line the Lawyers pockets by Judge Clark.
Further: The system is one where the Lawyers and Judges have set it up to protect each other and line each others pockets with Cash.
December 2015 – Defendant Janice Wolk Grenadier Stands up and speaks out against the Criminal Acts of Judge Nolan Dawkins in Regard to
his re-appointment - In front of the Courts of Justice in the Virginia Legislature – Several other Victims also stood up and spoke out about the
criminal actions of other Virginia Judges Courts of Justice A group of Elected Officials / Lawyers who practice in front of these Judges
VOTED ALL JUDGE’S BACK INTO THERE POSITIONS KNOWING THE CRIMINAL ACTS & ACTIONS OF THE JUDGES
The Professional Code of Responsibility of the Lawyers on the Courts of Justice Rule 8.4 Misconduct It is professional misconduct for a
lawyer to:
3
(a) violate or attempt to violate the Rules of Professional Conduct, knowingly assist or induce another to do so, or do so through the acts
of another;
(b) commit a criminal or deliberately wrongful act that reflects adversely on the lawyer's honesty, trustworthiness or fitness to practice
law;
(c) engage in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation which reflects adversely on the lawyer’s fitness to practice
law;
The Courts of Justice further – GUARANTEES THE JUDGES against complaints being investigated by HAND SELECTING THE JIRC (
The Judicial Inquiry and Review Committee where complaints are filed against Judges – and never investigated – Read More at
www.proseamerica.blogspot.com the $602,000. SCAM on the Virginia Citizens
Guaranteeing all Judge’s the ability to ignore the law and rule to protect their own and as Judge Clark stated very clearly to his good friend
“I HAVE NO CHOICE BUT TO LET HER OUT OF JAIL, I AM SO SORRY I CANNOT COLLECT YOUR LEGAL FEES FOR YOU”
The Appearance and the collusion is that all Judges in the State of Virginia have a Secret “Handshake” of “You Scratch my Back, I will line
you pockets with WINS in the court room for your Clients – Call me – Buy me Lunch or Dinner or what ever – but, we will not turn on our
own”
So what about those young Men and Women who go off to war to fight for the Rights our Constitution Give’s Americans of Due
Process?
December 19, 2014 Letter exposed that Michael Gardner was looking for someone to hire to Murder young girls he had molested and found
guilty with DNA – yet let out of jail by Chief Justice Cynthia Kinser.
December 31, 2014 Chief Justice Cynthia Kinser with no explanation to retire early (January 31, 2022 – expiration of her appointment) The
Appeals Court of the State of Virginia had denied Michael Gardner’s appeal / release – Cynthia Kinser let him out of jail by all appearance for
the Old Boys Network, to hire a hit man to kill the young women he had molested prior to his re-trail. She will receive her pension and perks for
cooperating and doing the bidding of the Old Boys Network for all her years.
January 23, 2015 - The Virginia Republican Party wants the U.S. Senate to investigate whether Democratic Sen. Mark Warner violated federal
law when he discussed possible job opportunities for a former state senator’s daughter. GOP Party Chairman Pat Mullins sent a letter Friday to
the U.S. Senate Select Committee on Ethics asking it to investigate Warner. He was part of a group of Democrats that tried unsuccessfully to
prevent former state Sen. Phil Puckett from resigning last summer. Puckett’s resignation gave Republicans control of the state Senate. Warner
has acknowledged he “brainstormed” with Puckett’s son about possible job opportunities for Puckett’s daughter but did not make any explicit job
offers. Federal prosecutors indicated in December their investigation into Puckett’s resignation was closed, they would ignore the criminal
actions. That Janice has followed up with a complaint to the Ethics Committee by all appearance along with the Judiciary are ignoring these
facts, Murder / Suicides et al.
September 2015 Judge Bellows “ORDER” Denies Janice Intervene with no hearing, and Orders Clerks to take no other filings by Janice
September 2015 Janice Intervenes in the Michael Gardner case – Michael Gardner takes a plea. The Old Boys Network cannot afford
two Murder for Hire case’s going at the same time. The question should be for all – What is the back room deal the Old Boys Network made
with Michael Gardner for the plea and his silence.
On or around October 3, 2015 we come full circle Charles Severance will be tried for the Murders of Nancy Dunning, Ron Kirby and Ruth Ann
Lodato with a police office having told Janice they had no real evidence that supports him doing it, that the City of Alexandria was in the process
of creating the needed evidence to support a conviction. That Judge Bellows who assisted Pete Scamado’s Murder / Suicide of Chris Mackney
will preside over the Charles Severance trial. That Judge Bellows understands and will disallow evidence that may find Charles Severance
innocent is without question, he has shown this in his pre-trial Orders. That Judge Bellows brings a Bias in support of Murder / Suicide into the
courtroom cannot be denied after reading “Bullied to Death”. That Judge Bellows is no different than the Judge’s that have ruled in Bias,
Retribution, Retaliation with the knowledgeable intend to ignore the law and to protect the criminal acts of David Grenadier and Ilona Ely
Grenadier Heckman are obvious in all documents and Orders filed in the courts. That Chris Mackney, Charles Severance and Janice Wolk
Grenadier and MANY OTHERS have in common is the Old Boys Network has made it there mission to kill or ruin there lives to protect
No doubt the Murderer needs to be stopped, yet the person who paid him to kill the above should be held accountable – No one will out the
Murderer for hire – because for free he will take that person out. It is the belief of Janice he does not kill if he has met you – and talked to you –
4
He kills anonymous only, because if he didn’t Janice believes he would have killed her by now, but, that she has met him and he has spared her,
as Mark Stuart did.
The “Old Boys Network” is an evil Gang of men and few women with no sole. They consist of the POWERFUL and WEALTHY of the
Judiciary, the Government and Elected Officials in Virginia and the District of Columbia. They believe they are above the law, and the truth
supposedly your best defense does not exist around them, that they are no more then a bunch of low life bully’s with money, and no class. The
leaders in this “Gang” are Judge Donald Haddock and Judge Donald Kent at least in the case of Janice Wolk Grenadier. In the case of Chris
Mackney it was Judge Bellows, who has now overlapped into Janice’s with the cover up of the hits and the trial of Charles Severance. That the
following law firms have dirty hands in collusion of these actors: Grenadier Anderson Starace Duffett and Kieser, Keller Heckman,
DiMuroGinsberg, Troutman Sanders aka Mays & Valentine, BWW Law Group aka Bierman Geesling Ward and Wood, Parker Simon & Kokolis
LLC, and other’s that are known and unknown.
Virginia Rated 47th and 49th in Corruption - Daily Beast rated Virginia second most Corrupt State -
http://www.loudountimes.com/index.php/news/article/region_survey_finds_virginia_second_most_corrupt_state987/ - State Integrity
Gave them an F - 47th most corrupt States - http://www.stateintegrity.org/virginia That Janice is not alone the corruption and lack of
over site or Due Process in the courts in Virginia, the Federal Courts of DC and Virginia is and are a disgrace.
Yet to date October 3, 2015 Janice has not been interviewed by the FBI in regard to the information in this article even with her many phone
calls to them – for help to protect herself and her girls.
Update as of October 30, 2016 which does go back and forth –
Divorce Lawyer Ilona Grenadier Heckman in Collusion with Judge James Clark filed a lawsuit to forclose on Janice’s home with
illegally gotten legal fees by DiMuroGinsberg and Michael Weiser. She hired Heba Carter a lawyer who went to the University of
Richmond.
We have learned the University of Richmond is where in 1987 Judge Donald Kent best friend to Judge Donald Haddock was President
James Comey and Senator Tim Kaine were both adjunct Professors at the same time by all appearance at the University of Richmond.
That the corruption and the illegal acts and actions of Judge Clark can be found at www.valaw2010.blogspot.com in the case filed
against him in the City of Alexandria for injunctive relief for his financial conflict along with other criminal activities.
But this E-mail of January 28, 2016 may say it better then anything:
The lawyers did not show up in court. They did not have to file anything – Judge James Clark was on their side as stated in the below
links
JWG Links – Video Update October 28, 2016
5
June 22, 2016 Janice Circuit Court of the City of Alexandria VA - exposing the corruption - Judge James Clark states he and Carter Land were
Trustee's on all of Burke and Herbert Loans for Friendship as he did on June 8, 2016. That Judge Clark further stated no financial compensation
from Burke and Herbert band directly or indirectly. Which must mean the lawyer representing Burke & Herbert from his law firm would have
had to do it for free - "friendship" still illegal. Janice states this is a "Shame Hearing" - Judge Clark States - "Not on this side" since when does
Judge's take sides? https://youtu.be/Lo5U4FrvdwI
In May of 2016 learned that Judge Clark had a financial relationship - I contacted the FBI and here is the conversation with the FBI that has
ignored it: https://youtu.be/DbdcVaZkItQ
These two videos show that I spoke with Gov. Terry McAuliffe and Brian Moran and showed him my Box of evidence that - that I had been
illegally jailed and tortured https://youtu.be/kQ1hRnaxvRc https://youtu.be/JevLlGOtQBE
Janice Exposes the Corruption of the City of Alexandria - Nazi Virginia the place Terrorist's can Buy $$$$ Justice
Janice Wolk Grenadier asking / exposing Mark Warner for the 3rd time having the discussion
he lied. DSCF0005 - Jailed so Senator Mark Warner could be Re-elected and https://youtu.be/rRs7cBEYAjQ
DSCF0039 Mark Warner Exposed as he Lies about what he knows - YouTube https://youtu.be/O10opcNIqNA
These Videos are the tapes of Janice Wolk Grenadier Standing UP and speaking out at the City of Alexandria Council Meeting
June 2016 COA Council Meeting COA June 18,2016 Council Meeting exposing Judge James Clark https://youtu.be/MXa5aVqLPPI
June 2016 Burke & Herbert Bank - Lying to me about the subpoena and that he had no idea I was to come today after I had already had a
conversation with another person there. https://youtu.be/gisnNjOgVk0
October 2016 City Council Meeting further exposing the corruption in the City of Alexandria https://youtu.be/vNKZD4a_6Fw
October 2016 - City of Alexandria Council Meeting - These two tapes show the Financial Questionable activity
https://youtu.be/GaNI8TEzWLM and The disclosure of the City Corruption in the finances - Private School $70,000 - for tennis
September 2016 City Council Meeting https://youtu.be/7rSIZ2oTh7A
Right with Crime - CSPAN – Talking about the Corruption with Judges https://youtu.be/lYM6ULrTfM0
CATO - Judge Merrick Garland https://youtu.be/lVIUoBWr2vQ
February 2016 - The $602,000 SCAM of the JIRC https://youtu.be/poQ6uHhSLXM
DSCF0042 City of Alexandria Council Meeting January 2016 - YouTube https://youtu.be/IZGoo4Bov1o
DSCF0047 City of Alexandria City Council Meeting December 2015 - YouTube https://youtu.be/yd9qz2ukExE
DSCF0048 City of Alexandria Council Meeting November 2015 - YouTube https://youtu.be/OmJWgr_qf28
DSCF0050 City of Alexandria Council Meeting October 2015 - YouTube https://youtu.be/cqj5DcHGS3c
DSCF0051 City of Alexandria Council Meeting September 2015 - YouTube https://youtu.be/qGavoOLEcRY
DSCF0055 City of Alexandria Council Meeting June 2015 - YouTube https://youtu.be/2qAc_YqdVUw
DSCF0056 City of Alexandria Council Meeting May 2015 - YouTube https://youtu.be/2qAc_YqdVUw
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=poQ6uHhSLXM City of Alexandria $602,000 Scam Council Meeting Feb 2016 -

https://youtu.be/poQ6uHhSLXM
6
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GDZ8UkJv78I Cato Question where to go for Help with Sydney Powell – Licensed to Lie - On July 25,
shocked by the answer https://youtu.be/GDZ8UkJv78I
We send young men and women into harms way to fight for rights that we no longer have as American Citizens. It is very scary and until you
are involved in a Slippery Slope of the Collusion and Corruption of the Judicial System - it is difficult to understand.
The entire event can be heard at http://cdn.cato.org/archive-2014/cbf

https://www.scribd.com/doc/303506666/RicoRaci-2-v-4-FINAL-JWG-v Complaint-October-17-2015

https://www.scribd.com/doc/303508177/USDC-VA-Exhibits-for-Rico-Rackering-Jan-6-2015
Read more at:

www.VaLaw2010.blogspot.com
www.ProSeAmerica.blogspot.com
@ProSeAm
JAMJustice.org - the solution to the criminal acts
ProSeAmerica.net
JAMJustice.org
www.Facebook.com/ProSeAmerica
www.Facebook.com/PSA-Your State Name
www.Facebook.com/jwgrenadier3
E-mail ProSeAmerica@gmail.com
Contact Janice at: 202-368-7178
That on Friday October 21, 2016 DOJ Joesph Guzinski stated very clearly his not investigating the criminal acts and actions was his concern for
his own life, the retaliation and retribution as well as when asked who is supervisor was he stated “The White House” not the Department of
Outline FBI / DOJ corruption / Bankruptcy Cover Up and others
1. Janice has been reporting this corruption on a regular basis - I know how bad it is and how horrid I have been treated and could never
understand and I knew everyone was being paid off or afraid - but, I guess I never knew the extend -
2. On October 11, 2016 - Thomas Gorman (Bankruptcy Court Trustee) was at the table and insisted with this other women - that she had been
ripped off by her lawyer - that he was going to get the DOJ - Joseph Guzinski to investigate.
3. DOJ Mr. Guzinski came and interviewed her and Mr. Gorman
4. On October 13, 2016 in court. I was 3rd on the docket, at or around 1.25 pm told I would be called by Mr. Gorman in about or within 30
minutes
6. Then Mr. Gorman calls a women's name I unfortunately, did not pay attention to the name - will need to figure it out - DOJ - Mr. Guzinski
goes up - he doesn't want anything to do with it. Mr. Gorman fights for the women - who does not show up in court so losses by default - but,
Mr. Gorman puts on fight to have it continued - to give it time to be investigated - he fights with the Judge that she should be heard. He believes
her and he thinks she was taken advantage of.
7. I ask DOJ Mr. Guzinski to stay in the court, as I am to be heard in the next half hour. He agrees turns around to stay - Mr. Gorman and the
Judge had seen me do this and had looked me in the eye -
8. I believe one of them signaled him not to stay - after he turned around and was on his way to sit - because he then abruptly turned and said he
couldn't. I then asked if he had a card.
9. I now am sure Mr. Guzinski was motioned for him not to stay by either Thomas Gorman or Judge Kenny
7
10. I was then left to be heard at the end. But, it wasn't just the end. The Judge took a break, it was to be 10 minutes, Thomas Gorman went
running out of the court room - I believe and the appearance was to the Judge.
11. It was about a 20-minute break and the hearing started. The hearing was held after 4 pm - after court hours so no one else could hear. The
hearing was bulling to me and the ruling by the Judge was unreasonable with no questions of substance asked of me. At the end I stood and ask
12. I did get Exhibits into the record that show the TRUTH and the corruption. Shows the pattern and practice and the criminal acts and actions.
13. I would learn after research that Judge Kenny went to the University of Richmond. the one common denominator of all.
14. On Friday, October 14, 2016 I filed for the Judge to recuse and Thomas Gorman be removed I file Criminal Claims sheets with back up
against Judge Clark and Ilona Grenadier Heckman. I filed a Notice to be heard and was denied.
I take a copy to the Department of Justice as well as other Documents to Mr. Guzinski
I then e-mail other information and request a meeting on Friday the 14th with Mr. Guzinski of the DOJ
Mr. Guzinski refuses the meeting saying he would read everything and then get back to me.
I continue sending Mr. Guzinski information / things
Now on Friday, October 21, I have evidence that is confusing and want to meet with him to show it to him, it is time for a meeting
and he is ignoring me. I stop by his office late in the afternoon. He YELLS at me.
That he is not going to meet with me and any information I have e-mail it to him. When I state "This is my Life" in a very calm and
professional manner he states - angry and all red faced yelling at me "NO - THIS IS ABOUT MY LIFE - ME" I was extremely taken
back. shocked - to me it was one more person saying I was a NOBODY.
When I left the office since I had not recorded it - I sat down and wrote the whole thing out, that he was more concerned about himself
and how this would outcome him then me. That he was afraid of the Retaliation and Retribution on him, then what I had been through.
That he wasn't going to help me - because he most likely at or around 50 was to afraid of loosing his pension - is what I wrote. That he
didn't give a shit about me - he was only concerned about himself and the retaliation and retribution against him was not worth doing the
right thing.
As you may or may not know I reached out to everyone -
15. On Sunday night October 23, 2016 ( and now I am going to work back words with the evidence that shows the collusion of Gov. McAuliffe
and the DOJ / FBI.
16. The two articles released late on the 23rd show the collusion and the payoffs to the officials in the FBI - as everyone knows Terry McAuliffe
was the fund raiser and got Bill Clinton elected to the President. He was supposed to be 1st choice for VP. The plan was he would run for
Governor - and it was just a stepping stone - I have been loud and standing up and speaking out a problem for all of them since 2010. That they
couldn't control. As you can see in the above links
17. Clinton Ally Aided Campaign of FBI Official’s Wife – WSJ $675,000.
18. http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/2016/10/23/virginia-gov-terry-mcauliffe-donated-467500-to-campaign-of-wife-of-senior-fbi-official-
who-oversaw-clinton-email-probe/
VIRGINIA GOV. TERRY MCAULIFFE DONATED $467,500 TO CAMPAIGN OF WIFE OF SENIOR FBI OFFICIAL WHO OVERSAW
CLINTON EMAIL PROBE
Virginia Gov. Terry McAuliffe is a Clinton goon and as corrupt as it gets. So it should be no surprise that McAuliffe donated $467,500 to
campaign of state senate campaign of the wife of an FBI official. You say why is this a big deal? Because that senior FBI official is Andrew
McCabe who oversaw the Hillary Clinton email probe. Commie Comey’s corruption is looking much more clear these days.
The political organization of Virginia Gov. Terry McAuliffe, an influential Democrat with longstanding ties to Bill and Hillary Clinton, gave
nearly $500,000 to the election campaign of the wife of an official at the Federal Bureau of Investigation who later helped oversee the
investigation into Mrs. Clinton’s email use.
8
Campaign finance records show Mr. McAuliffe’s political-action committee donated $467,500 to the 2015 state Senate campaign of Dr. Jill
McCabe, who is married to Andrew McCabe, now the deputy director of the FBI.
The Virginia Democratic Party, over which Mr. McAuliffe exerts considerable control, donated an additional $207,788 worth of support to Dr.
McCabe’s campaign in the form of mailers, according to the records. That adds up to slightly more than $675,000 to her candidacy from entities
either directly under Mr. McAuliffe’s control or strongly influenced by him. The figure represents more than a third of all the campaign funds Dr.
McCabe raised in the effort.
Mr. McAuliffe and other state party leaders recruited Dr. McCabe to run, according to party officials. She lost the election to incumbent
Republican Dick Black.
19. In May of 2016 - Terry McAulliffe was going to be speaking in Alexandria - I decide to show up. My lucky day - the news media for all
stations was following him around like crazy. Not the sound, but, my picture as you can see in this video was everywhere - you will notice the
box and the picture. The box is the box of un-open evidence that I have and the picture is of the Mark Stuart who was hired - under Judge Clark's
direction to help him find me incompetent. When the Alexandria Police were called - I was told the Commonwealth Attorney - Randy Sengel
said they were not allowed to take any police reports from me. Same YouTube as above:
You tube me and Terry McAuliffe https://youtu.be/kQ1hRnaxvRc You will see in this that I am showing him my evidence and the
picture - the media according to them had deleted all the verbal conversation of me and him. This came from ABC
20 - The articles of the $120,000 from a Chinese business man and the other video that ABC gave me Youtube -
https://youtu.be/JevLlGOtQBE
The Articles - http://freebeacon.com/issues/doj-investigates-mcauliffe-donation-chinese-clinton-backer/

http://freebeacon.com/issues/doj-investigates-mcauliffe-donation-chinese-clinton-backer/ As you can see on my Facebook page most
of the links to this story are corrupt
21. BELOW is a link to the FBI one of the many conversations I have tried to have with them - I caught this one agent off guard - she even gave
her page # - but again she did not ever follow up with me - no matter how many e-mails etc - Unfortunately I was late to the record everything
Above you will see a link to the FBI for 06-08-2016 - with me very comely telling the investigator - what is happening. I also have the e-mails
showing that I sent the information in.
22. I start googling and doing outlines on all he players and learn the common ground is the University of Richmond and The University of
Richmond law School also known as TC Williams Law School. That in googling adjunct professor you learn they make between $5,000 -
$20,000. I have learned privately they make $35,000 - $50,000
23. I also learned that Judge Kent King or head of the Old Boys Network was the president of the school in 1987
24. Tim Kaine was an adjunct Professor for 6 years
25. James Comey was an Adjunct Professor, since being with the FBI speaks there regularly (Paid), has won awards from the school which
brings gifts, and then paid for commencement speech May of 2016.
o James Comey would then go on to do several interviews with the press that he had put several people in jail for far less then the
o James Comey stated it was his job to give the information to the DOJ and there job to decide the charges
o James Comey after Bill Clinton met with Loretta Lynch on the tar mac became the spokes person for stating "HRC did nothing
wrong was just sloppy" in direct conflict of what he had said in the past
The above evidence I believe shows without a doubt the corruption and the purchase of the FBI / DOJ why we can not get any help in our cases
and have nowhere to go for help
26. We also don't want to forget about the cover-up of Michael Gardner and how our Virginia Legislature and the FBI kept silent the removal of
our Supreme Court Justice Cynthia Kinser as she let him out of jail so he could hire ah Hitman to kill the girls.
27. Further in DC you don't want to forget about the removal of Judge Richard Roberts after RAPING a 16 year old Victim – the Judges have
https://www.washingtonian.com/2016/09/08/one-dcs-powerful-judges-got-accused-rape/
http://abovethelaw.com/2016/09/a-detailed-dive-into-the-rape-allegations-against-a-former-federal-judge/
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/mar/17/dc-federal-judge-to-retire-following-1980s-rape-ac/
He was closely involved in the Cover-Up of my cases in the District of Columbia Federal Court - He was retired with full benefits and we will all pay
for his fun and freedom for the rest of his life.
9
Sent: Friday, May 5, 2017 10:03 AM
To: Mark Levine <mark@radioinsidescoop.com>; Dave Albo <dave@davealbo.com>;
wilsons@washpost.com; mserrano@oag.state.va.us; whoriskeyp@washpost.com; Vernon Miles
<vmiles@connectionnewspapers.com>; whistleblower@judiciary-rep.senate.gov;
whitej@washpost.com; Raquel Okyay <raquelokyay@gmail.com>; john.cochran@abc.com;
john.donvan@abc.com; John Kennedy <john.kennedy@law360.com>; john.chapman@alexandria.gov;
tips@abajournal.com; tips@abovethelaw.com; newsletter@news.usmagazine.com; Newseditors
<newseditors@wsj.com>; newseditors@dowjones.com; 60m Cbs News <60m@cbsnews.com>;
2020@abc.com; abcboozer@verizon.net; FoxFriends <friends@foxnews.com>;
Shawnette.Wilson@foxtv.com; fox28news@fox28.com; newsdesk@wjla.com; Washingtonian Magazine
<editorial@washingtonian.com>; editor@valawyersmedia.com; alerts@wtvr.com; krskeen@sbgtv.com;
Tom Jackman <jackmant@washpost.com>; Full Measure with Sharyl Attkisson
<fullmeasurenews@gmail.com>; 48hours@cbsnews.com; ga_webeditor@alm.com;
nationallawjournal@alm.com; dailybrief@huffingtonpost.com; peter.vieth@valawyersmedia.com;
washington.field@ic.fbi.gov; novapc@ic.fbi.gov; marcus.wilson@ic.fbi.gov;
Wykema.C.Jackson2@usdoj.gov; Noah.Simon@mail.house.gov
Subject: * VICTIMS of Virginia - Breakfast, Lunch, Dinner and a Weekend Getaway buys a Virginia Judge
as The VA Legislature / Courts of Justice Covers it UP
Importance: Low
Good Morning,
I know how busy we all are. But, I am asking you to please take
a moment and listen to the video from Law Day 2017, and the
link to my and others testimony in front of the Courts of
Justice.
? The question becomes has the members of the Courts of

Justice violated their Professional Code of Ethics with the VSB
Reporting Misconduct
• (a) A lawyer having reliable information that another lawyer has committed a violation of the Rules of
Professional Conduct that raises a substantial question as to that lawyer's honesty,
trustworthiness or fitness to practice law shall inform the appropriate professional authority.
• (b) A lawyer having reliable information that a judge has committed a violation of applicable rules of
judicial conduct that raises a substantial question as to the judge's fitness for office shall inform
the appropriate authority.
The Cover Up of Divorce Lawyer Ilona Grenadier Heckman's

Criminal Spree includes all. You believe that the Judiciary, the
Government and Elected Officials all acting together against
just "ONE" person to Cover Up for Ilona will go away. THIS IS
Going NATIONAL and all Federal agency are being notified and
Federal Complaints being filed. The book is being written, one
that includes names - it is about the "TRUTH". The attached
Brief shows I am not alone.
I did send in a Demand letter that was ignored, I would like to

see the Government, the Elected Officials, and the Judiciary
man up and settle this. I believe because the Old Boys Network
believes they, and all of you - that you are above the
law. Remember it was the FBI that took down Chief Judge
Cynthia Kinser for letting Michael Gardner out of jail - which he
then tried to hire a "hit man" after molesting the young girls he
was convicted for and Chief Judge Richard Roberts for raping a
16-year-old.
Testimony in front of the Courts of Justice:
Greg Harrington: https://youtu.be/EQQlqzrCiqQ
Janice Wolk Grenadier:

JIRC https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NapE1NFROYk&t=5s
Judge Johnston https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vmtaDPQ_w2A
Judge Parker for Sally Minetree https://youtu.be/GvSeBt-3WxU
Judge Appeals Court VA https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eY5NHLLOFb0
Also ProSeAmerica.Blogspot.com and VALaw2010.Blogspot.com
Attached: Supreme Court Jackie Bogle Meuse

A FEW of the Other Victims in Virginia:
• Cynthia Haag
• John Arundel
• John Geer RIP
• Rick Perry
• Sally Minetree RIP
• Deanna Upson
• Edwina Rogers
• Kliegh
• Ashley O'Brien
• Victims of Micheal Gardner - Several young girls molested -
have started a group to empower those harmed
• Dr Rixsie RIP
• Ruth Ann Gimmitorio Lodato RIP
• John Doe RIP
• Nancy Dunning RiP
• Ron Kirby RIP
• Megan Owen Barry RIP
• Justin Wolfe
• Julian Dawkins RIP
• Robby Niese Raped by COA Police officer
• Julie Goble COA Police detective sued City of
Alexandria
• Brandon Raub
• Renee Walker
• Micheal Field
• Judge Tracy Thorne-Begland
• Rohini Hughs
• Martha Kent - x-wife Judge Kent
• Bev Hennager
• Renae Jennings
• Greg Harrington
• Janice Wolk Grenadier
• Amy Bird
• Sonia Grenadier
• Scott Subitski
• Isidoro Rodriguez
• Jane Doe - still in court with Ilona / minor children
• ? Charles Severance
• Lee Farkas
The List of Victims is growing and the stories are being exposed
- as "1" you can marginalize us - together we are strong?
And - Why so many dead?
Law Day 2017 "We the People" is living on - and next year will
be only better and bigger. JW Grenadier Law Day
2017 https://youtu.be/gskC0LDNf-8
If interested you can read more

at ProSeAmerica.Blogspot.com and VALaw2010.Blogspot.com
Thank you for your time to help here - I would like to settle this
- but, I am willing to take it to the DOJ, President Trump and the
Supreme Court of the United States of America.
Warmly,
JW Grenadier
@ProSeAm
202-368-7178
In The
Supreme Court of Virginia

______________________
RECORD NO. __________

______________________
JACQUELINE BOGLE MEUSE, individually and derivatively on behalf of

ALEXANDRIA INVESTMENTS, LLC, BOGLE INDUSTRIES, INC., KING
STREET METRO VENTURE, LLC, 4607 EISENHOWER ASSOCIATES,
LLC, 4601 EISENHOWER ASSOCIATES, LLC, and THE IRREVOCABLE
BOGLE TRUST,
Petitioners – Appellants,
v.
BRUCE HENRY, individually and as the Co-Trustee of the Irrevocable Bogle

Trust, the Manager of Alexandria Investments, LLC, the Manager of King
Street Metro Venture, LLC, the Manager of 4607 Eisenhower Associates, LLC,
and the Manager of 4601 Eisenhower Associates, LLC, PAUL MACDONALD,
individually and as a Director and Officer of Bogle Industries, Inc., and as the
Trustee of the Irrevocable Bogle Trust, NANCY FIFE, HENRY &
O’DONNELL, P.C., and DONNA H. HENRY,
Respondents – Appellees.
_________________________
BRIEF AMICI CURIAE OF LECTURERS AND PROFESSORS IN ETHICS IN

THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA LAW SCHOOLS IN SUPPORT OF
GRANTING THE PETITION FOR APPEAL
_________________________
William T. Woodrow III (VSB No. 88122)

STONE & WOODROW LLP
250 West Main Street, Suite 201
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902
(855) 275-7378 (Telephone)
(646) 873-7529 (Facsimile)
will@stoneandwoodrowlaw.com
Counsel for Amici Curiae

THE LEX GROUP  1108 East Main Street  Suite 1400  Richmond, VA 23219
(804) 644-4419  (800) 856-4419  Fax: (804) 644-3660  www.thelexgroup.com
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
TABLE OF AUTHORITIES .........................................................................iii
I. INTEREST OF THE AMICI ................................................................ 1
II. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................... 2
III. NATURE OF THE CASE, MATERIAL PROCEEDINGS

BELOW, AND STATEMENT OF FACTS ........................................... 4
IV. ARGUMENT ...................................................................................... 4
A. The Alexandria Investments Operating Agreement

(“AIOA”) Reflects A Violation Of Rule 1.8(A) And 1.8(H),
Both In The Document Itself And In The Circumstances
Of Its Adoption .......................................................................... 7
1. The Terms of the AIOA Were Not Fair and

Reasonable ..................................................................... 8
2. Consent in Writing ......................................................... 11
3. Bruce Henry Limited His Liability For Malpractice

With A Forfeiture Clause That Would Trigger Even
Against A Successful Claim ........................................... 11
B. The AIOA Is Void As Against Public Policy ............................. 12
1. The Forfeiture Clause Is Unconscionable ...................... 13
2. A Forfeiture Clause Cannot Abrogate The Law ............. 15
C. No Free Right To Contract This Forfeiture Clause .................. 18
D. The Buck Stops at the Virginia Supreme Court ....................... 18
VI. CONCLUSION .................................................................................... 18
i
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE .................................................................... 21
ATTACHMENT A
ii
TABLE OF AUTHORITIES
Page(s)
CASES
Byars v. Stone,
186 Va. 518 (1947) .......................................................................... 16
Cartos v. Hartford Acci. & Indem, Co.,

160 Va. 505 (1933) .......................................................................... 12
Dissolution of Validation Review Associates [Berkun],

223 AD2d 134, 646 NYS2d 149 (2nd Dept. 2001) ........................... 17
Dunford Roofing v. Dunford,

2001 WL 396869 (W. D. Va. 2001) .................................................. 15
Flippo v. CSC Associates III, L.L.C.,

262 Va. 48 (2001) ............................................................................ 15
Giannotti v. Hamway,
239 Va. 14 (1990) ............................................................................ 15
Heinzman v. Fine, Fine, Legum Fine,

217 Va. 958 (1977) .......................................................................... 13
Hume v. United States,

132 U.S. 406 (1889) ........................................................................ 13
Krippner v. Matz,
205 Minn. 497, 287 N.W. 19 (1939) ................................................. 13
LK Operating, LLC v. Collection Grp., LLC,

331 P.3d 1147 (Wash. 2014) ........................................................... 12
Musselman v. Willoughby Corp.,

230 Va. 337 (1985) .......................................................................... 16
iii
Philyaw v. Platinum Enters.,
54 Va. Cir. 364 (Spotsylvania Cnty. Jan. 9, 2001)............................ 13
Remora Investments, L. L. C. v. Orr,

277 Va. 316 (2009) .................................................................... 15, 16
Simmons v. Miller,
261 Va. 561 (2001) .................................................................... 15, 16
W.R. Grace & Co. v. Local Union 759, Int’l Union of United Rubber,
461 U.S. 757 (1983) ........................................................................ 13
Youngwall v. Youngwall Realty, LLC, et al.,

Supreme Court of the State of New York for Nassau County,
New York, Short Form Order,
Index No. 22266/07 (June 24, 2008)........................................... 16-17
Yukon Pocahontas Coal Co. v. Consolidation Coal Co.,

72 Va. Cir. 75 (Buchanan 2006)....................................................... 12
STATUTES
Va. Code § 13.1-1023 ............................................................................... 10
Va. Code § 13.1-1023.1 .............................................................................. 8
Va. Code § 13.1-1024 ............................................................................... 14
Va. Code § 13.1-1024.1 .............................................................................. 8
Va. Code § 13.1-1025 ................................................................................. 8
Va. Code § 13.1-1028 ................................................................................. 8
Va. Code § 13.1-1028C .............................................................................. 9
iv
RULES
Va. Sup. Ct. R. 5:30(b)(2) ........................................................................... 1
VCPR 1.7.................................................................................................. 16
VCPR 1.7(b)(1) ......................................................................................... 16
VCPR 1.7(b)(4) ......................................................................................... 16
VCPR 1.8........................................................................................ 7, 18, 19
VCPR 1.8(a) ...................................................................................... passim
VCPR 1.8(a)(3) ......................................................................................... 11
VCPR 1.8(h) ......................................................................................... 7, 19
OTHER AUTHORITIES
LE Op. 1606 ............................................................................................. 17
Lyman Johnson, Delaware’s Non-Waivable Duties,

91 Boston Univ. L.R. 701 (2011) ............................................................... 18
v
I. INTEREST OF THE AMICI1
The amici are interested in this case because of its potential
ramifications upon the practice of law in Virginia, and the manner in which it
could practically impact the application of the Virginia Rules of Professional
Conduct (“VRPC”). Specifically, whether Virginia courts will uphold
arbitration orders when the arbitrators clearly ignore or disregard egregious
violations of the VRPC in reaching their decision, and the message this
sends to the profession.
Amici curiae, consisting of former and current ethics professors
from Virginia law schools, respectfully move for leave of Court to file the
accompanying brief under Virginia Supreme Court Rule 5:30 in support of
the Petition for Appeal. In support whereof, the amici say as follows:
1
Pursuant to Rule 5:30(b)(2), the Petitioners but not the Respondents have
consented to the filing of this brief amicus curiae. A list of the Amici is
included at Attachment A. The Amici all are currently or have recently
taught professional responsibility at a law school in the Commonwealth.
The Petitioner has contributed resources towards the preparation of this
Brief, consistent with the practice of Amicus briefs in this Court. Counsel to
the Amicus Curiae has taken external advice and followed what it believes
are appropriate steps under the Virginia Code of Professional
Responsibility for the waiver of conflicts and acting zealously for the Amici
herein. No Amici were involved in the arbitration or the confirmation of the
award in Circuit Court. Mr. Stone and Mr. Woodrow served as counsel to
the Petitioner after the final award was confirmed in order to pursue
settlement discussions and then to bond the underlying proceedings for
appeal and suspend enforcement. Their engagement terminated on April
25, 2017.
1
The amici are:
• George M. Cohen, Professor of Law, University of Virginia
• Thatcher A. Stone, Lecturer in Law, University of Virginia
and lawyer in private practice
• Victoria S. Sahani, Associate Professor of Law,
Washington & Lee University
ramifications upon the practice of law in Virginia and the teaching of legal
ethics. Specifically, this case raises the question whether Virginia courts
will uphold arbitration orders when the arbitrators clearly ignore or
disregard egregious violations of the Virginia Rules of Professional Conduct
in reaching their decision. The amici believe that the duty rests ultimately
with this Court to police the Virginia legal community. The fear that this
important responsibility could be usurped and tarnished by the misguided
actions of an arbitration panel, and our general concern with ensuring that
Virginia lawyers and our students uphold the highest ethical standards,
motivate the amici to write.
II. INTRODUCTION
The facts of this case read as if they came straight from the sort of
nightmare hypothetical encountered in a law school ethics class exam:
2
Bruce Henry, a Virginia attorney, enthroned himself as the lifelong
manager of an LLC, Alexandria Investments (“AI”) – his legal client –
bestowing upon himself the right to pass his position on to his heirs and
immunizing himself from all challenges to his behavior, excepting solely
that of a successful action of removal for cause. Even if he were to steal
from or defraud the LLC, the client was barred from any monetary remedy.
Bruce Henry accomplished this feat by drafting a clause for the new
Alexandria Investments Operating Agreement that he was demanding, and
that resulted in the complete and immediate expulsion of a Member if she
dared even to initiate any action for any remedy (other than removal for
cause) against Bruce Henry’s wrongful conduct. The clause would operate
even in the event that the action proved to be successful. Bruce Henry, the
Attorney for AI, drafted that self-serving, unfair and unreasonable clause for
the benefit of Bruce Henry, the Guarantor of a loan to a related LLC and he
did it with the full blessing of Bruce Henry, the manager of AI. No party to
the operating agreement ever consented in writing. Bruce Henry, in the
proceedings below, invoked that self-serving and unfair clause that facially
contravenes this Court’s Rules. The arbitrators and the Circuit Court, in
violation of public policy and in usurping this Court’s sole authority for
regulating attorney conduct, enforced the clause and took away a
3
Member’s 50% ownership interest because she, on behalf of all members,
derivatively, initiated a challenge to Bruce Henry’s conduct as lawyer (and
LLC manager) and to the forfeiture clause itself. To protect the citizens of
this Commonwealth and to uphold the high standards to which lawyers
educated and licensed in the Commonwealth should be held, this Court
should reverse and vacate the award.

BELOW, AND STATEMENT OF FACTS
The Amici adopt the Nature of the Case, Material Proceedings Below,
and Statement of Facts set forth in the Petition for Appeal filed by the
Petitioners.
IV. ARGUMENT2
This case presents an important and necessary opportunity for this
Court to consider and clarify whether it will allow an arbitration panel and
the Circuit Court to dismiss and downplay outright violations of the Virginia
Code of Professional Responsibility (VCPR) in furtherance of a ruling that
2
Amici have been unable to confirm that the entire record from the City of
Alexandria Circuit Court was properly available to the Supreme Court at the
time this brief was due to be filed. Accordingly in some instances where
factual assertions are made, amici base them upon similar assertions made
in either the expert report of Lyman Johnson, Plaintiff’s Memorandum in
Opposition to Sanctions and Fees, or Plaintiffs' Response To The “Joint
Motion Of The Defendants And The Bogle Entities To Confirm Arbitration
And Enter Final Judgment" And Plaintiffs' Application To Vacate Arbitration
Award.
4
affronts Virginia public policy or whether the Court will protect the public
and the integrity of the bar, by upholding the VCPR despite the Arbitrators’
neglect and error.
Specifically, the issue is whether an arbitration order is void as
against public policy when it enforces a membership interest forfeiture
clause in an LLC Operating Agreement (the “Forfeiture Clause”) that is
triggered by the mere seeking of any monetary or equitable or fiduciary
remedy (in arbitration or in court) against a wrongdoing manager (other
than an action solely for removal for cause), even if that manager were to
steal LLC funds or knowingly commit deliberate fraud where, as in this
case:
(i) Bruce Henry organized and represented the LLC, AI, that was bound
by the Forfeiture Clause;
(ii) Bruce Henry, who drafted the Forfeiture Clause, is also the
beneficiary of the Clause because he is the sole manager of AI (a
condition that he also demanded);
(iii) AI, the LLC client, did not consent to the Forfeiture Clause in writing;
(iv) The sole initial member of AI, Jack Bogle, did not consent to the
Forfeiture Clause in writing;
5
(v) Bruce Henry did not inform Meuse of the existence of AI (and her
50% interest) until after her father died in 2012; and
(vi) The Forfeiture Clause purports to protect Bruce Henry from all
challenges, other than removal for cause, whether they be based on
statute or common law, equity or fiduciary responsibility, in a way that
is not fair and reasonable for the LLC nor the assignees nor their
transferees and also in a way that clearly violates public policy.
The draconian forfeiture provision reads:
11.01 Forfeiture. If any Member(s) shall, directly or indirectly,

contest or dispute before any tribunal (including without
limitation that contemplated by Section 10.01 of this
Agreement) the exercise by the Managers of their powers
hereunder or call into question before any tribunal the validity,
legality or enforceability of any of the provisions of this
Agreement, then, such Member(s) shall be expelled from the
Company and shall cease to have any Membership Interest or
any of the other rights, status or privileges of a Member, but
such former Member(s) shall not be released or discharged
from any of the obligations of a Member under the provisions of
this Agreement unless provided otherwise by the affirmative
vote (or written consent) of the Managers taken in accordance
with the provisions of Article IV; provided, however, the
foregoing forfeiture provision shall not apply to any Member
who has prevailed on the merits of an action seeking solely to
remove for cause the Designated Manager or any successor
Manager designated by him.
6
A. The Alexandria Investments Operating Agreement (“AIOA”)
Reflects A Violation Of Rule 1.8(A) And 1.8(H), Both In The Document
Itself And In The Circumstances Of Its Adoption
VCPR 1.8 provides in pertinent part as follows:
(a) A lawyer shall not enter into a business transaction with a

client or knowingly acquire an ownership, possessory, security
or other pecuniary interest adverse to a client unless:
(1) the transaction and terms on which the lawyer acquires the
interest are fair and reasonable to the client and are fully
disclosed and transmitted in writing to the client in a manner
which can be reasonably understood by the client;
(2) the client is given a reasonable opportunity to seek the
advice of independent counsel in the transaction; and
(3) the client consents in writing thereto.
....
(h) A lawyer shall not make an agreement prospectively limiting

the lawyer’s liability to a client for malpractice, except that a
lawyer may make such an agreement with a client of which the
lawyer is an employee as long as the client is independently
represented in making the agreement.
Bruce Henry was bound to comply with the requirements of Rule
1.8(a) because he was simultaneously acting as the LLC’s attorney and
serving as the LLC’s manager. Henry would be compensated by the LLC
for his role as a manager, which is a “transaction” with a client, and Henry
drafted a provision that would redound to his pecuniary benefit to the
potential detriment of the LLC client. The attorney bound by Rule 1.8
carries the burden of proof that he complied with it, yet Bruce Henry did not
offer any evidence that the Rule’s conditions were met. He did not even
7
argue that the Forfeiture Clause was fair; he just made the specious
argument that Jack Bogle wanted it. A claim that was belied by the clear
documentary evidence that it was he who demanded and imposed the
condition.
1. The Terms of the AIOA Were Not Fair and Reasonable
The Forfeiture Clause and enforcement contravene longstanding,
fundamental, unalterable principles of Virginia LLC law, including Va. Code
13.1-1023.1,13.1-1024.1,13.1-1025 and 13.1-1028. The Clause effectively
renders the attorney-manager immune as a fiduciary from any legal
accountability whether under statute or common law. Any action by any
Member, acting either on the Member’s own behalf (“directly”) or on behalf
of the LLC (“indirectly”), that challenges Mr. Henry’s conduct and seeks any
remedy other than the removal of Mr. Henry for cause would trigger the
Clause upon the moment of filing. Even the one action (removal for cause)
that does not trigger the Clause automatically is greatly discouraged by the
risk of a Member losing her entire interest if unsuccessful.
If the Clause is triggered, not only does a Member lose automatically
her entire Membership Interest in the LLC and all membership rights, the
other Member, who may agree that Mr. Henry’s behavior is wrongful,
nonetheless has no incentive to join any challenge because the second
8
Member stands to potentially gain the entire membership interest of the
LLC by remaining silent. This forfeiture coupled with the accompanying
unjust enrichment creates a perverse incentive never to challenge Mr.
Henry’s conduct even if it is illegal or criminal. The unjust Operating
Agreement, coupled with the insulating Forfeiture Clause, bestows on
Henry complete control of the business with almost zero accountability, a
lifetime of this despotic condition, plus assured succession to his wife or
whomever she might appoint after his death.
Of course LLC draftsmen, managers and members have freedom of
contract to arrange their affairs, but under Virginia statutory and decisional
law the statutory managerial standard of conduct cannot be altered, no
exculpation for willful or knowing misconduct is contractually permitted, and
access to records cannot be denied. See for example, Va. Code 13.1-
1028C. Moreover, strikingly here, Section 5.11 of the Operating Agreement
specifically provides that Mr. Henry, as manager, is not exculpated from
willful misconduct, but this provision is rendered mere lip service by the
accompanying Forfeiture Clause.
The Forfeiture Clause unfairly and unreasonably restricts  upon
pain of forfeiting a Member’s entire ownership interest and rights in the LLC
 one (or all) Member(s), and the LLC itself, from pursuing, in both
9
arbitration and in court, any money damages or equitable remedy against
the wrongdoing manager (other than removal) even if he steals LLC funds,
commits intentional fraud, deliberately destroys or wastes LLC assets, or
engages in any other egregious misconduct.
The Forfeiture Clause prevents a Member, and the LLC itself, from
acting to recover, in both arbitration and in court, monetary damages
caused by a willfully or knowingly misbehaving LLC manager, in
contravention of Virginia LLC law, equity, and public policy.
The Forfeiture Clause precludes a Member, and the LLC itself, from
seeking injunctive or other equitable relief against a willfully or knowingly
misbehaving LLC manager to prevent or halt such misconduct, in
contravention of Virginia LLC law, equity, and public policy. See, e.g., Va.
Code 13.1-1023.
The Forfeiture Clause unfairly and unreasonably prohibits an LLC
(and any or all of its members acting on its behalf) from pursuing or
initiating a petition for dissolution of the LLC based on willful or knowing
manager misconduct, in contravention of Virginia LLC law, equity, and
public policy.
The Forfeiture Clause was unfairly and unreasonably exercised in
this case when Meuse on behalf of all members brought a derivative action
10
on behalf of AI to assess alleged wrongs, and in addition to denying access
to evidence as pointed out in Appellant’s brief, Bruce Henry exercised the
Forfeiture Clause to oust Meuse as a member from AI, at a loss of millions
of dollars in value.
2. Consent in Writing
The undisputed evidence in this case is that no party to the AIOA
communicated their consent to the agreement in writing as required by
VCPR 1.8(a)(3). There is no written consent by the LLC client itself,
whether from a disinterested person acting on behalf of the LLC or from
Jack Bogle; there is no written consent from Jackie Meuse; there is no
written consent from Nancy Fife; there is no written consent from anyone.
3. Bruce Henry Limited His Liability For Malpractice With A Forfeiture

Clause That Would Trigger Even Against A Successful Claim
The arbitrators held, inexplicably, that “the AI Operating Agreement
limits suits against Henry in his capacity as manager. It does not purport to
limit claims of attorney malpractice.” This was truly a baffling finding for a
number of reasons, not least of which was the fact that Henry himself
invoked the forfeiture provision in the context of Meuse suing him for
malpractice on behalf of Alexandria Investments. Moreover, as manager of
the LLC, Mr. Henry would not sue himself for malpractice on the LLC’s
behalf.
11
B. The AIOA Is Void As Against Public Policy
Agreements that violate the VRPC, violate public policy and are void.
Yukon Pocahontas Coal Co. v. Consolidation Coal Co., 72 Va. Cir. 75, 103
(Buchanan 2006) (“Moreover because the agreement violates the Virginia
Rules of Professional Conduct, the Agreement violates public policy and is
void.”) This conclusion has been established in Virginia and in sister
states. LK Operating, LLC v. Collection Grp., LLC, 331 P.3d 1147, 1163
(Wash. 2014) (“[c]ontracts formed in violation of the RPCs are
unenforceable to the extent that they contravene public policy,” and finding
here that a violation of Rule 1.8(a) violates public policy).
“Forfeitures are never favored either at law or in equity, and
provisions for a forfeiture are strictly construed against the party for whose
benefit they are inserted.” Cartos v. Hartford Acci. & Indem, Co., 160 Va.
505, 518 (1933).
A forfeiture, then, inserted into an agreement between a lawyer and
his client must be scrutinized with even greater vigor.
“(I)t is a misconception to attempt to force an agreement

between an attorney and his client into the conventional modes
of commercial contracts. While such a contract may have
similar attributes, the agreement is, essentially, in a
classification peculiar to itself. Such an agreement is permeated
with the paramount relationship of attorney and client which
necessarily affects the rights and duties of each.”
12
Heinzman v. Fine, Fine, Legum Fine, 217 Va. 958, 962-63 (1977) (quoting
Krippner v. Matz, 205 Minn. 497, 506, 287 N.W. 19, 24 (1939)).
Matters of public policy are for the courts to decide, not arbitrators.
W.R. Grace & Co. v. Local Union 759, Int’l Union of United Rubber, 461
U.S. 757, 766 (1983)(“the question of public policy is ultimately one for
resolution by the courts.”) (review of arbitration decision).
1. The Forfeiture Clause Is Unconscionable
The Court should void as a matter of public policy an agreement
made between a lawyer and his client that fails to meet the fairness
standard established by Rule 1.8(a). The question here is not even close.
In fact the Forfeiture Clause is so unfair that it is unconscionable – a far
heightened standard of unfairness than what is necessary to establish a
Rule 1.8(a) violation.
Unconscionability is concerned with the intrinsic fairness of the

terms of the agreement in relation to all attendant
circumstances. It has been said that an agreement is
unconscionable if no person in his senses would make it on the
one hand and no fair and honest person would accept it on the
other.
Philyaw v. Platinum Enters., 54 Va. Cir. 364, 367 (Spotsylvania Cnty. Jan.
9, 2001) (citing Hume v. United States, 132 U.S. 406 (1889) (finding an
unconscionable arbitration provision unenforceable).
13
No person in their senses would agree to forfeit their interest in a
company and agree to remain indefinitely liable for any number of unknown
future obligations simply for pointing out in official proceedings the manager
had stolen assets or breached a statutory or common law duty. Moreover,
no person in their senses would agree that he can never challenge the
manager (who does not even own an interest in the LLC) without forfeiting
his interests. To illustrate the unconscionable nature of this provision – if
Meuse and Fife together challenged Henry’s actions, Henry would enforce
this provision against them both and there would be NO members left to
ever challenge him again, but they would remain liable for all of his actions
and those of his successors (his wife) until they die. Thus, Henry would
essentially own and control the company, and have responsibility
exclusively for dissolution, creditors’ rights, and solvency. Even worse,
Henry is a lawyer, Alexandria Investments is his client, and Henry and
Henry & O’Donnell drafted this provision to benefit Henry. It goes without
saying that no fair and honest person would accept this forfeiture provision.
The Member whose interest was obtained by assignment from her father
before the Forfeiture Clause came into effect never consented to it in
writing or even saw the Operating Agreement in which the Clause appears.
14
2. A Forfeiture Clause Cannot Abrogate The Law
In his capacity as the Manager of Alexandria Investments, Henry was
subject to the Virginia Limited Liability Company Act, decisional law, and
the AIOA. The Virginia Supreme Court has likened the standards
applicable to an LLC Manager to those of a corporate director. Flippo v.
CSC Associates III, L.L.C., 262 Va. 48, 56-57 (2001); Remora Investments,
L. L. C. v. Orr, 277 Va. 316, 321-22 (2009). Thus, the “good faith business
judgment” statutory standard under Virginia’s LLC Act (Va. Code Ann.
§ 13.1-1024) applies only to actual business judgments made on behalf of
the LLC itself- Flippo, 262 Va. at 57 (citing authority) and Simmons v.
Miller, 261 Va. 561 at 577 (2001) - and does not apply where an LLC
Manager, similar to a corporate director, engages in self-dealing, such as
by causing the LLC to make payments to, or for the benefit of, the Manager
or his affiliates, whether in the form of management fees or attorney fees or
otherwise. Giannotti v. Hamway, 239 Va. 14, 24-25 (1990); Dunford
Roofing v. Dunford, 2001 WL 396869 (W. D. Va. 2001) (Virginia
corporation guarantee of a director- stockholder obligation voided as a
conflict of interest transaction). No Virginia Supreme Court decision has
ever held that an LLC manager’s statutory or common law fiduciary duty
can be extinguished by agreement.
15
As attorney for Alexandria Investments, Henry and his law firm also
owed the LLC’s a fiduciary duty of utmost good faith, fidelity, and fairness,
as well as a duty of exercising reasonable care. Byars v. Stone, 186 Va.
518, 529 (1947). This includes an obligation not to act adversely to the
interests of his client without client knowledge and consent.3 Id. No consent
was ever given by Alexandria Investments, or its Members, to Henry’s
extensive self-dealing because neither Jack Bogle nor Meuse nor Fife ever
consented. Henry also owed a duty to make full disclosure of material
information to the client. Musselman v. Willoughby Corp., 230 Va. 337, 343
(1985).
The forfeiture clause attempts to abrogate membership rights that
were established by statute and refined through decisional law and seeks
to remove accountability for breaching fiduciary duties – also established
by statute and decisional law – that attorneys and LLC management owe
their clients and members. This is an impermissible use of a forfeiture
clause that operates against Virginia public policy, decisional law and the
Va. Code. Orr and Simmons. Other states are in accord. See, Youngwall
3
This is also a problem under Rule 1.7. There is a potential personal
interest conflict between the lawyer and the client. The lawyer is by virtue of
the Clause effectively having the client agree to an advance waiver of this
conflict, which is unenforceable under Rule 1.7(b)(1) and (b)(4). To raise
the conflict problem would potentially call into dispute Henry’s role as a
manager.
16
v. Youngwall Realty, LLC, et al., Supreme Court of the State of New York
for Nassau County, New York, Short Form Order dated June 24, 2008,
Index No. 22266/07 (Forfeiture clause prohibiting the pursuit of judicial
dissolution of LLC held unenforceable because judicial dissolution is a
statutory right.); Dissolution of Validation Review Associates [Berkun], 223
AD2d 134, 646 NYS2d 149 (2nd Dept. 2001)(provision within shareholders
agreement to waive statutory and common-law right to petition for judicial
dissolution was unenforceable as against public policy evidenced by
statute).
Further, the Clause effectively constrains what should be the client’s
unfettered right to terminate the lawyer-client relationship, imposing a
penalty of forfeiting a member’s entire ownership interest in the LLC on a
decision to terminate the relationship by making a claim against the lawyer.
Such a penalty also violates public policy and the Clause should be
rendered unenforceable by this unreasonable impairment of the client’s
right to end the lawyer-client relationship. See LE Op. 1606 (“A client
retains the absolute right to discharge the lawyer at any time for any reason
or without reason”).
17
C. No Free Right To Contract This Forfeiture Clause
Any attempt to characterize the Forfeiture Clause as an element of
free rights to contract as the parties may do so, now popular in Delaware
Chancery actions involving LLC’s, must fail because Virginia has no law
similar to Delaware permitting such departures from equity’s imposition of
fiduciary duties through contract in LLC’s. See, Lyman Johnson,
Delaware’s Non-Waivable Duties, 91 Boston Univ. L.R. 701 (2011). Virginia
is not Delaware and fiduciary duties may not be eliminated in Virginia.
D. The Buck Stops at the Virginia Supreme Court
The Virginia Supreme Court promulgates the VCPR to determine the
propriety or impropriety of attorney conduct. This Court also has the final
power to supervise lawyer conduct in the Commonwealth. Review of this
arbitration award would be an exercise of that power and a reassurance to
current and future members of the Virginia Bar that the high standards and
ideals to which they adhere and to which every aspiring Virginia lawyer is
exhorted will not be allowed to fade and tarnish on this Court’s watch.
VI. CONCLUSION
The award and confirmation thereof should be vacated as requested
in the Appellant’s brief, because the arbitration panel failed to properly
identify and give weight to the issues arising under VCPR 1.8. This failure
18
directly impacted the award and resulted in Meuse losing all of her property
rights in Alexandria Investments. The Forfeiture Clause is not fair and
reasonable, its substance and implementation broke every provision in
VCPR 1.8(a) and (h), and it operates in violation of Virginia public policy
and is unconscionable.
The courts, not arbitrators, are the ones to determine if there has
been a violation of CPR 1.8 such that the forfeiture Clause is void and
unenforceable. This court should find such a violation and Meuse should
be restored to her membership in AI. Her fees and expenses bringing her
derivative action on behalf of all members should also be addressed. If the
Court fails to serve justice in this case, then no justice will be done. A
disheartening message will be sent to the watching Virginia Bar and those
who teach legal ethics will be at a loss to explain to their students how such
conduct could be ignored by the courts.
19
Respectfully Submitted,
William T. Woodrow III, Esq. (VSBN 88122)

Stone & Woodrow LLP
Charlottesville, VA 22902
Ph. (855) 275-7378
Fax (646) 873-7529
Counsel for Amici Curiae.
20
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I certify that, on this 2nd day of May, 2017, a copy of this Brief of
Amici Curiae was served, via U.S. Mail, postage prepaid, upon:
William H. Hurd John H. Craddock, Jr.

Stephen C. Piepgrass Michele Burke Craddock
TROUTMAN SANDERS LLP CRADDOCK LAW PLC
1001 Haxall Point 2304 West Main Street
Richmond, Virginia 23219 Richmond, Virginia 23220
william.hurd@troutmansanders.com jcraddock@craddocklawfirm.com
stephen.piepgrass@troutmansanders.com mcraddock@craddocklawfirm.com
(804) 697-1335 (804) 309-4200
(804) 697-1320
Counsel for Petitioners-Appellants Counsel for Petitioners-Appellants
Stephen M. Sayers Robert E. Scully, Jr.

Arthur E. Schmalz STITES & HARBISON, PLLC
Erin P. Thompson 1199 N. Fairfax Street, Suite 900
HUNTON & WILLIAMS LLP Alexandria, VA 22314
1751 Pinnacle Drive, Suite 1700 Telephone: (703) 837-3929
McLean, VA 22102 rscully@stites.com
Telephone: (703) 714-7400
ssayers@hunton.com - and –
aschmalz@hunton.com
Michael P. DeGrandis
ethompson@hunton.com
DEGRANDIS LAW OFFICE PLLC
Counsel for Defendant Bruce W. Old Gallows Road, Suite 350
Henry Vienna, VA 22182
Telephone: (703) 752-6269
mdegrandis@degrandislaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Paul

Macdonald
21
Thomas M. Buchanan Michael J. Holleran
WINSTON & STRAWN LLP Evan M. Stepanick
1700 K Street NW WALTON & ADAMS, P.C.
Washington, DC 20006 1925 Isaac Newton Square, Suite
Telephone: (202) 282-5000 250
tbuchana@winston.com Reston, VA 20190
Telephone: (703) 790-8000
Counsel for Defendant Nancy Fife mholleran@walton-adams.com
estepanick@walton-adams.com
Counsel for Defendant Donna H

Henry
John O. Easton Robert J. Stoney

Carol T. Stone William B. Porter
JORDAN COYNE LLP BLANKINGSHIP & KEITH, P.C.
10509 Judicial Drive, Suite 200 4020 University Drive, Suite 300
Fairfax, VA 22030 Fairfax, VA 22030
Telephone: (703) 246-0900 Telephone: (703) 691-1235
Facsimile: (703) 591-3673 Facsimile: (703) 691-3913
c.stone@jocs-law.com rstoney@bklawva.com
j.easton@jocs-law.com wporter@bklawva.com
Counsel for Defendant Henry & Counsel for Alexandria Investments,

O’Donnell, P.C. LLC; King Street Metro Venture,
LLC; and 4607 Eisenhower
Associates, LLC
Bernard J. DiMuro
Stacey Rose Harris
DIMUROGINSBERG, PC
Telephone: (703) 684-4333
Facsimile: (703) 548-3181
bdimuro@dimuro.com
sharris@dimuro.com
Counsel for Bogle Industries, Inc.
22
William T. Woodrow III
23
ATTACHMENT A
5/2/2017 George M. Cohen | University of Virginia School of Law
FǺČŲĿȚỲ
Faculty Search s
George M. Cohen
Břǿķǻẅ Přǿfěșșǿř ǿf Čǿřpǿřǻțě Ŀǻẅ
Ěmǻįŀ
ģmč3ỳ@vįřģįňįǻ.ěđų
https://content.law.virginia.edu/faculty/profile/gmc3y/1154200 1/2
Pħǿňě
(434) 924-3814
Řǿǿm
ẄB171Ǻ
Ǻșșįșțǻňț
Ķǻřěň Șǿẅěřș
Ħį-řěș Pħǿțǿ
ĚXPĚŘȚİȘĚ
Čǿňțřǻčțș
Přǿfěșșįǿňǻŀ řěșpǿňșįbįŀįțỳ
Ǻģěňčỳ ǻňđ pǻřțňěřșħįp
Ŀǻẅ ǻňđ ěčǿňǿmįčș
Biography
Publications
Courses
Media
George Cohen joined the faculty in 1993 as an associate professor of law after a oneyear visit to the Law School. He became a full
professor in 1995. He teaches contracts, professional responsibility and agency and partnership. He has also taught antitrust and
law and economics.
A summa cum laude and Phi Beta Kappa graduate of Yale University, Cohen earned his J.D. in 1986 and a Ph.D. in economics in
1992 from the University of Pennsylvania. During law school, he served as articles editor of the University of Pennsylvania Law
Review. Cohen was a clerk to Judge Walter K. Stapleton of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit in Wilmington,
Delaware, before joining the law faculty at the University of Pittsburgh in 1988.
Cohen was chair of the UVA Faculty Senate from 201213 and has served as an ethics consultant and expert for several law firms.
ĚĐŲČǺȚİǾŇ
J.D., University of Pennsylvania Law School, 1986
Ph.D., University of Pennsylvania, 1992
B.A., Yale University, 1982
Fǻčųŀțỳ įň țħě Ňěẅș

Ģěǿřģě Ķ. Ỳįň, Ň.Ỳ. Ŀǻẅmǻķěřș Đěvįșě Ŀǻẅ țǿ Șěě Přěșįđěňț Țřųmp'ș Țǻxěș (Ǻșșǿčįǻțěđ Přěșș)
Țǿbỳ J. Ħěỳțěňș, Șẅěěț Řěvěňģě fǿř ŲVǻ Mǿčķ Țřįǻŀ Țěǻm (Țħě Đǻįŀỳ Přǿģřěșș)
Ǻ. Běňjǻmįň Șpěňčěř, Bįŀŀ Țǻřģěțș 'Fřįvǿŀǿųș' Șųįțș, Bųț Čřįțįčș Șǻỳ İț Mįșșěș Mǻřķ (Bŀǿǿmběřģ BŇǺ)
5/2/2017 Victoria Shannon Sahani :: Faculty :: W&L Law School
For Faculty/Staff | For Students
Calendar | Directory | Contact Us
Search: Search Go
Academics
Admissions
Alumni and Giving
Career Strategy
Faculty
Law Library
News and Media
W&L Home
Law Home > Faculty
Victoria Shannon Sahani
Associate Professor of Law
B.A., Harvard University; J.D., Harvard Law School.
Biography
Email: sahaniv@wlu.edu
Victoria Shannon Sahani is an Associate Professor of Law at Washington and
Office: 445 Sydney Lewis Lee University School of Law. She received the Lewis Prize for Excellence in
Hall Legal Scholarship given by the Francis Lewis Law Center in 2014 and the
Phone: 5404588016 Law Alumni Faculty Fellowship Award for Teaching in 2015. Her articles and
Fax: 5404588488 essays have been or will be published in the UCLA Law Review, the Tulane
Law Review, the Cardozo Law Review, the Tennessee Journal of Business
Biography
Law, and the Journal of International Arbitration. Her scholarship examines
Publications innovations in international and domestic dispute resolution, like thirdparty
SSRN Page
financing. She currently teaches or has previously taught civil procedure,
Curriculum Vitae alternative dispute resolution, professional responsibility, and international
investment treaty arbitration. She is an expert on all aspects of domestic and
international dispute resolution procedures, including civil procedure,
negotiation, mediation, domestic arbitration, international arbitration, and
investment treaty arbitration. She also previously served as an Adjunct
Professor at Fordham Law School where she cotaught “Introduction to
Investment Arbitration.”
In addition to authoring several articles, essays, and blog posts, Professor
Sahani is working on the second edition of her 2012 book entitled ThirdParty
Funding in International Arbitration (2012: Wolters Kluwer). She is also
https://law2.wlu.edu/faculty/profiledetail.asp?id=686 1/3
working on a chapter discussing thirdparty funders as stakeholders in
international arbitration for the forthcoming book entitled Cambridge
Compendium of International Commercial and Investment Arbitration (Andrea
Bjorklund, Franco Ferrari & Stefan Kröll eds., Cambridge University Press)
(forthcoming in 2017). She also previously published a book chapter entitled
“The 2012 ICC Rules of Arbitration” in Contemporary Issues in International
Arbitration and Mediation: The Fordham Papers (2011), Arthur Rovine, ed.
(2012: Brill / Martinus Nijhoff Publishers).
Professor Sahani is a Member of the Academic Council of the Institute for
Transnational Arbitration (ITA), made up of the top academics in the field of
international arbitration from around the globe, and the Task Force on Third
Party Funding jointly organized by the International Council for Commercial
Arbitration (ICCA), which is the premier international commercial arbitration
policy and membership organization, and Queen Mary University of London.
The mission of the Task Force is to develop guidelines and norms for third
party funding by bringing together leading thirdparty funders, State parties,
private parties, arbitrators, counsel, arbitral institutions, leading academics in
the field, and representatives from trade and regulatory authorities, such as
national bar associations, the Civil Justice Council, the Association of
Litigation Funders, the International Bar Association, and the American Bar
Association (ABA) Section on International Law. She is also a Member of the
Advisory Council of the Alliance for Responsible Consumer Legal Funding
(ARC Legal Funding), which is a multistakeholder alliance involving
litigation funders, consumers, academics, community activists, policy makers
and other industry supporters that advocates for responsible regulation and
best practices on the consumer side of the litigation finance industry. In
addition, she served on the Editorial Committee for the forthcoming update to
the Benchbook on International Law published by the American Society of
International Law (ASIL).
Prior to joining the academy, Professor Sahani served for five years as Deputy
Director of Arbitration and ADR in North America for the International Court
of Arbitration of the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC). In this
capacity, Professor Sahani advised government attorneys, inhouse counsel
and law firm attorneys on all phases of arbitration, mediation, and ADR,
including negotiating and drafting dispute resolution clauses, selecting neutrals
and enforcing arbitral awards. She also assisted the United States Council for
International Business (USCIB), which serves as the United States National
Committee to the ICC, in nominating arbitrators, mediators, and experts for
ICC Cases.
Prior to joining the ICC, Professor Sahani served as an associate attorney with
Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP, where she specialized in complex tax
credit and municipal bond financing arrangements for affordable housing and
community development real estate transactions, as well as matters involving
American Indian tribes. In the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina, she traveled to
New Orleans in January 2006 to assist the Washington Lawyers’ Committee
for Civil Rights Fair Housing Project with two housing discrimination claims.
Professor Sahani participated in the inaugural 20032004 class of the Harvard
University Management Fellowship Program, during which time she served as
External Relations Fellow in Harvard’s Office of Government, Community,
and Public Affairs.
Professor Sahani holds a bachelor's degree from Harvard University and a law
degree from Harvard Law School. She is an active member of the bar in New
York and the District of Columbia.
For the Media
Professor Sahani is available to be interviewed on the following subjects:
• Alternative Dispute Resolution
• Arbitration
• Civil Procedure
• International Law
• Litigation Funding
• Mediation
Find subject matter experts.
Faculty
Department Navigation:
Faculty Profiles
Deans & Department Heads
Faculty Scholarship Blog
Law Centers
Publications Archive
Looking for Something?
Search Site Find People
Get Directions Browse Calendar
5/2/2017 Thatcher A. Stone | University of Virginia School of Law
FǺČŲĿȚỲ
Faculty Search s
Thatcher A. Stone
Ŀěčțųřěř
Ěmǻįŀ
țħǻțčħěř@șțǿňěǻňđẅǿǿđřǿẅŀǻẅ.čǿm
https://content.law.virginia.edu/faculty/adjunctprofile/tas8sa/1212389 1/2
Biography
Courses
Since 1982 Thatcher A. Stone has been practicing at the highest domestic and international levels of finance, banking, assetbased
lending, structured finance, insurance company regulation and licensing and associated credit rating issues. Stone has extensive
experience with export credit agencies and banks in financing, enforcing agreements relating to and repossessing intercontinental
commercial jet aircraft all over the world. In addition, he provides litigation services in the complete aviation arena, including
financing, bankruptcy and passenger claims. In 2013 Thatcher relocated his practice from New York to Virginia. Stone has made
new law, including Stone v. Continental Air Lines, which established nonaccident passenger claims for denied boarding. A
second victory, James H. Hunter v. Lufthansa, Etihad Airways and United Air Lines, in an interim decision dated March 28,
2012, and recently settled in the Eastern District of New York, clarified when the Warsaw and Montreal Conventions do not apply
to airline negligence, despite a tariff provision to the contrary. Finally, in a jury decision dated Dec. 12, 2016, Stone won a verdict
finding KLM Airways guilty of abuse of process, rarely proven in the U.S.
Stone was the founder of Xavian Holdings, Inc., an export credit insurance company. He is rated AV by Martindale Hubbell, the
highest peer review rating a U.S. lawyer can achieve. He also holds a Martindale client distinction award, won by less than 1
percent of lawyers nationally.
Stone has taught aviation law at the School of Law since 2005. He is a member of the Law School’s Executive Committee and
formerly served as the chairman of the National Selection Committee for Jefferson Law Fellows. He is a trustee of the Madison
Lane and Rugby Road Charitable Trust. He serves on two nonprofit boards in the Charlottesville Community, Ash Lawn Opera
and the Fralin Museum.
Stone is admitted in all New York federal and state courts, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second and Ninth Circuits, the U.S.
Supreme Court and other state and federal courts for particular cases around the country. He is an active skier and sailor, and a
retired pilot. He is a 1978 graduate of the College, with distinction, and a 1982 graduate of the Law School. In 2008 he was named
an Alumni Raven at Final Exercises by former University President John Casteen.
ĚĐŲČǺȚİǾŇ
J.D., University of Virginia School of Law, 1982
University of Virginia, 1978

Bǻřbǻřǻ Ǻ. Șpěŀŀmǻň, Șčįěňčě įň Șpįțě ǿf İțșěŀf (Ňǻțųřě)
The Many Victims of No Pictures of
Michael Gardner
John Doe
The Young Girls
Molested who
And
Stood Up Dr. Robert Rixse
After having a Hit Man RIP
Hired to take them out Murder for Hire
Chris Mackney *Janice Wolk Grenadier *Ruth Ann Lodato *Ron Kirby *Nancy Dunning *Megan Owen Barry
Murder for Hire and Questionable Suicide’s in the City of Alexandria and Northern Virginia
This puts together several known facts – through the life of Janice Wolk Grenadier and different News articles and book facts from
“Bullied to Death” the Chris Mackney story, Edited and Published by FamilyCourt.com, INC attorney Michelle McDonald, written by: Mike
Volpe. That the obvious is being covered up by the FBI, the Judiciary, the Government and Elected Officials who are using there personal
“POWER and FINANCIAL POWER” to illuminate those that they find annoying or whom may get in their way through Murder for Hire or
Questionable Suicides, illegal jailing that when put together it shows a pattern and practice of the “Old Boys Network” in the State of
Virginia.
Pete Scamardo in 1968 hired a hit man Charles Harrelson to kill his child hood friend Sam Delegia Jr, which brings the question
was the idea of how to get rid of your spouse / or other brought to the Old Boys Network in the 70’s by Pete Scamardo as the hits known begain
in or around 1984 with Dr. Rixsey. That by the 1990’s in two Commercial / Land Development Association known Nationwide with
headquarters in the City of Alexandria Pete Scamardo was President, Chairman on the boards as an active citizen – hiding his true idenity and
past criminal history from the locals. This started to unravel, to be exposed through the divorce of his daughter to Chris Mackney who would
take his own life in December of 2013 from the bullying of Pete Scamardo, his attorneys whom he paid handsomly and Judge Bellows who
today is the Judge for Charles Severance. That Judge Bellows by all apperance in the news and record has disallowed any negative information
or truth on the spouses / third parties or issues the victims may have been having with others prior to opening their front doors in the City of
Alexandria and being MURDERED.
That where Janice Wolk Grenadier live’s in a circle around Janice thier have been 5 known Murder type hits – Dr. Rixsey, John Doe, Nancy
Dunning ( which you will read came to Janice’s home twice to check on Janice, now believed Nancy knew more and was from what Nancy said
afraid of what could happen and maybe knew what was going to happen to her) Ron Kirby and Ruth Ann Lodato. That all five have strong
connections to the Old Boys Network.
July 1. 1984 Who shot Dr. Robert Rixse / Murdered for opening his front door. We know who hired the killer – the boyfriend of his x-wife.
But what is the evidence of who shot him? Did the bullets that killed Dr. Rixse in 1984 match the bullets of Nancy Dunning and others? Where
they tested? The story the police released was the murderer with no evidence was a man floating in the Potomac dead whom had Mafia ties.
Easy for the City of Alexandria police and the FBI as they consider this murder solved.
We then have unknown date and name of John Doe Murdered for opening his front door in the City of Alexandria, also connected to the Old
Boys Network and Murdered, whom has received no real press that can be found.
Then on or around September 3rd of 1997 that on an unexpected cab ride to the airport as Janice’s x-husband David Grenadier (son of the late
Judge Albert Grenadier and step-son of Divorce Lawyer Ilona Ely Freedman Grenadier Heckman of Greanadier Anderson Starace Duffett and
Kieser) as he was suppose to take Janice to the airport and was late, Janice was outside waiting and not in her home. Janice’s x-hsuband as
Janice had called him to find out where he was – started yelling at her and saying a cab was on the way. Janice can persume now his
disappointment the money it appears he and Ilona spent to have Janice killed has come back to haunt them. When Janice got in the cab and the
driver could hear David yelling he said to Janice hang up the phone, hang up the phone if you don’t hang up the phone I will pull over and hang
it up for you. Janice hung up the phone, the driver than said we can take care of that for $5,000.00 – you don’t have it – then $2,000 we can
work it out. Janice was handed a phone number, Janice tossed it in the trash can thinking it had been a set up – Janice now believes with out
question it was to be a hit and today she was to be dead. Janice has never been questioned by the City of Alexandria Police or the FBI even
though she has reached out several times with her information.through Commonwealth Attorney Brian Porter & Sheriiff Lawhorene (who had
her tourtured in jail)That in February / March of 1998 Nancy Dunning who would open her front door in 2003 came to Janice on different
occations to check on her safty. The question know arrises was she aware of the outcome that was meant for Janice in September of 1997.
November 1997 That Lawyer Ilona in collusion with David Grenadier, Andrea Grenadier, Robin Grenadier passed a rumor around that caused
David Grenadier to pull a gun in the home with Janice’s girls in the home.
1
February 2003 the Suicide of Megan Owen Barry wife of Fairfax County Sheriff Stan G. Barry – The Washington Post reported that at 12:30
am Sheriff Barry had stepped out and when he came back his wife had committed suicide. The Blue Wall calls this a Murder, but of course no
investigation.
December 2003 the Murder of Nancy Dunning wife of City of Alexandria Sheriff James Dunning – never questioned “oops” say the Police
when Dunning dies in South Carolina a few days after Janice Wolk Grenadier on the radio questions the investigation or lack of investigation
into the Murder.
March of 2011 – City of Alexandria police, Fire and Ambulance come to the home of Janice Wolk Grenadier while she is on travel – she is
supposedly “DEAD” in the home? There is no record of this in the City of Alexandria. Two neighbors have confirmed this with Janice and
the one who convinced the police to not hack down her door but to allow him to open it with the key he had. It was not till June of 2011 when
Janice’s neighbor shared this with her she became aware of it. When researched thier is no record yet two other neighbors have confirmed this.
December 2011 / February 2012 – Deliberate tampering with knowledgeable intend of the Grand Jury by Judge Potter and Commonwealth
October 2012 – Janice’s documents submitted into the record, when she went to check that they had been filed – she is told to take them or they
would throw them out, Janice refused to take them and then they are mailed back to her by Judge’s Kemler, Dawkins and Clark. The box about
4” thick has been x-rayed and shows the documents but, never opened still In the box
December / January time frame of 2012 & 2013 Lawyer Ilona in collusion with others as a favor or hired a gentleman that goes
by the name of Mark Stuart who informs Janice he was to drug Janice and get sexual inappropriate pictures of Janice, or to rape one of Janice’s
daughters, or to plant drugs on Janice’s daughter or in the home to give Circuit Court Judge’s Kemler, Dawkins and Clark, information to make
JWG incompetent to file any other documents. Mr. Stuart said the Lawyer Ilona will go to any length to harm Janice or Janice’s daughters. That
Lawyer Ilona will continue to do what she can to distract Janice from becoming successful and moving on with Janice’s life. That Lawyer Ilona is a
“Greedy Jew” that all Lawyer Ilona’s actions are deliberate to cause harm to Janice. When the Alexandria Police were called they informed
Janice they were instructed by Commonwealth Attorney Randy Sengel to not take any reports of issue.
December of 2013 – Ilona Grenadier Heckman and Presidential Candidate Loretta Lax Miller do a “HATE OF CATHOLICS, CHRISTIONS et al”
Blog – jwgrenadierisalair.blogspot.com taken down while Janice is in jail.
February 18, 2014 - FBI cautions residents of public corruption in Va. - http://www.wusa9.com/story/news/local/2014/02/18/fbi-cautions-residents-of-public-
corruption-in-northern-virginia/5585877/ WASHINGTON (WUSA) -- The Federal Bureau of Investigation's (FBI) Washington Field Office is looking to identify any public corruption occurring in Northern Virginia.
The FBI says public corruption can occur "when a public official, at any level of government – local, state or federal – does any official act in exchange for money, or other free goods or services, for private gain. Public
corruption could also include public employees who take something of value for their own personal gain, thereby violating the public's trust." The FBI says many of their investigations into public corruption start once they
receive a tip from someone. If you want to help identify potential criminal activity, the Washington Field Office has set up a Northern Virginia Public Corruption Hotline at 703-686-6225 and you can also e-mail them at
NOVAPC@ic.fbi.gov.
2

October 11, 2014 – Breaking news Senator Mark Warner and aid to Governor Terry McAuliffe guilty and admit to offering a Federal
Judgeship to daughter of Phil Puckett
October 14, 2014 – Janice exposes on Blog VaLaw2010.blogspot.com information of corruption by Senator Warner
October 22, 2014 – November 12, 2014 – 22 days Janice illegally jailed and tortured in the City of Alexandria, Solitaire Confinement till 5pm
on Election day Tuesday, November 4, 2014. Illegally Jailed to: 1. Silence her and stop exposure of e-mails between herself and Mark Warner’s
office on the corruption in the Judiciary. Janice went to Mark Warner for help instead he had her jailed, at the same time it was exposed his “Pay
to Play” with a Federal Judgeship for a favor. Being ignored by the Senate Ethics Committee. 2. To Bully / scare her into either committing
Suicide or to turning the other check of the corruption and not holding Virginia and the Federal Judiciary, the Government and Elected Officials
accountable, as well as the criminal acts and actions of the Old Boys Network in Virginia
That the law is very clear: That Judge Clarks actions have turned back time. Giving me less rights then a slave. Taking someone under Title 42
US Code 1994 and Title 18 US Code 1581(a): Whoever holds or returns any person to a condition of PEONAGE, shall be fined under this title
for imprisoned not more than 20 years or both. That on October 22, 2014 I was placed in jail for failure to pay legal fees in 30 days which is a
violation of my Thirteenth Amendment "Neither Slavery not involuntary servitude, except as punishment for a crime where of the party shall
have duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any subject to their Jurisdiction". Furthermore the right by placing me "under" a
state Peonage / Involuntary Servitude violating the Fourth Amendment right by malicious prosecution, false imprisonment and unconstitutional
arrest. This violation of my Eight Amendment Right as to Excessive Bail which in this case constitutes "Restitution Bail" which further shows
the knowledgeable malicious intent to silence me till the election was over on November 4th. 2014. Bias, Retaliation and Retribution to further
line the Lawyers pockets by Judge Clark.
December 2015 – Defendant Janice Wolk Grenadier Stands up and speaks out against the Criminal Acts of Judge Nolan Dawkins in Regard to
his re-appointment - In front of the Courts of Justice in the Virginia Legislature – Several other Victims also stood up and spoke out about the
criminal actions of other Virginia Judges Courts of Justice A group of Elected Officials / Lawyers who practice in front of these Judges
The Professional Code of Responsibility of the Lawyers on the Courts of Justice Rule 8.4 Misconduct It is professional misconduct for a
lawyer to:
3
(a) violate or attempt to violate the Rules of Professional Conduct, knowingly assist or induce another to do so, or do so through the acts
of another;
(b) commit a criminal or deliberately wrongful act that reflects adversely on the lawyer's honesty, trustworthiness or fitness to practice
law;
(c) engage in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation which reflects adversely on the lawyer’s fitness to practice
law;
The Courts of Justice further – GUARANTEES THE JUDGES against complaints being investigated by HAND SELECTING THE JIRC (
The Judicial Inquiry and Review Committee where complaints are filed against Judges – and never investigated – Read More at
Guaranteeing all Judge’s the ability to ignore the law and rule to protect their own and as Judge Clark stated very clearly to his good friend
“I HAVE NO CHOICE BUT TO LET HER OUT OF JAIL, I AM SO SORRY I CANNOT COLLECT YOUR LEGAL FEES FOR YOU”
The Appearance and the collusion is that all Judges in the State of Virginia have a Secret “Handshake” of “You Scratch my Back, I will line
you pockets with WINS in the court room for your Clients – Call me – Buy me Lunch or Dinner or what ever – but, we will not turn on our
own”
Process?
December 19, 2014 Letter exposed that Michael Gardner was looking for someone to hire to Murder young girls he had molested and found
guilty with DNA – yet let out of jail by Chief Justice Cynthia Kinser.
December 31, 2014 Chief Justice Cynthia Kinser with no explanation to retire early (January 31, 2022 – expiration of her appointment) The
Appeals Court of the State of Virginia had denied Michael Gardner’s appeal / release – Cynthia Kinser let him out of jail by all appearance for
the Old Boys Network, to hire a hit man to kill the young women he had molested prior to his re-trail. She will receive her pension and perks for
cooperating and doing the bidding of the Old Boys Network for all her years.
January 23, 2015 - The Virginia Republican Party wants the U.S. Senate to investigate whether Democratic Sen. Mark Warner violated federal
law when he discussed possible job opportunities for a former state senator’s daughter. GOP Party Chairman Pat Mullins sent a letter Friday to
the U.S. Senate Select Committee on Ethics asking it to investigate Warner. He was part of a group of Democrats that tried unsuccessfully to
prevent former state Sen. Phil Puckett from resigning last summer. Puckett’s resignation gave Republicans control of the state Senate. Warner
has acknowledged he “brainstormed” with Puckett’s son about possible job opportunities for Puckett’s daughter but did not make any explicit job
offers. Federal prosecutors indicated in December their investigation into Puckett’s resignation was closed, they would ignore the criminal
actions. That Janice has followed up with a complaint to the Ethics Committee by all appearance along with the Judiciary are ignoring these
facts, Murder / Suicides et al.
September 2015 Judge Bellows “ORDER” Denies Janice Intervene with no hearing, and Orders Clerks to take no other filings by Janice
September 2015 Janice Intervenes in the Michael Gardner case – Michael Gardner takes a plea. The Old Boys Network cannot afford
two Murder for Hire case’s going at the same time. The question should be for all – What is the back room deal the Old Boys Network made
with Michael Gardner for the plea and his silence.
On or around October 3, 2015 we come full circle Charles Severance will be tried for the Murders of Nancy Dunning, Ron Kirby and Ruth Ann
Lodato with a police office having told Janice they had no real evidence that supports him doing it, that the City of Alexandria was in the process
of creating the needed evidence to support a conviction. That Judge Bellows who assisted Pete Scamado’s Murder / Suicide of Chris Mackney
will preside over the Charles Severance trial. That Judge Bellows understands and will disallow evidence that may find Charles Severance
innocent is without question, he has shown this in his pre-trial Orders. That Judge Bellows brings a Bias in support of Murder / Suicide into the
courtroom cannot be denied after reading “Bullied to Death”. That Judge Bellows is no different than the Judge’s that have ruled in Bias,
Retribution, Retaliation with the knowledgeable intend to ignore the law and to protect the criminal acts of David Grenadier and Ilona Ely
Grenadier Heckman are obvious in all documents and Orders filed in the courts. That Chris Mackney, Charles Severance and Janice Wolk
Grenadier and MANY OTHERS have in common is the Old Boys Network has made it there mission to kill or ruin there lives to protect
No doubt the Murderer needs to be stopped, yet the person who paid him to kill the above should be held accountable – No one will out the
Murderer for hire – because for free he will take that person out. It is the belief of Janice he does not kill if he has met you – and talked to you –
4
He kills anonymous only, because if he didn’t Janice believes he would have killed her by now, but, that she has met him and he has spared her,
as Mark Stuart did.
Judiciary, the Government and Elected Officials in Virginia and the District of Columbia. They believe they are above the law, and the truth
supposedly your best defense does not exist around them, that they are no more then a bunch of low life bully’s with money, and no class. The
leaders in this “Gang” are Judge Donald Haddock and Judge Donald Kent at least in the case of Janice Wolk Grenadier. In the case of Chris
Mackney it was Judge Bellows, who has now overlapped into Janice’s with the cover up of the hits and the trial of Charles Severance. That the
following law firms have dirty hands in collusion of these actors: Grenadier Anderson Starace Duffett and Kieser, Keller Heckman,
DiMuroGinsberg, Troutman Sanders aka Mays & Valentine, BWW Law Group aka Bierman Geesling Ward and Wood, Parker Simon & Kokolis
LLC, and other’s that are known and unknown.
http://www.loudountimes.com/index.php/news/article/region_survey_finds_virginia_second_most_corrupt_state987/ - State Integrity
Gave them an F - 47th most corrupt States - http://www.stateintegrity.org/virginia That Janice is not alone the corruption and lack of
over site or Due Process in the courts in Virginia, the Federal Courts of DC and Virginia is and are a disgrace.
Yet to date October 3, 2015 Janice has not been interviewed by the FBI in regard to the information in this article even with her many phone
calls to them – for help to protect herself and her girls.
Divorce Lawyer Ilona Grenadier Heckman in Collusion with Judge James Clark filed a lawsuit to forclose on Janice’s home with
illegally gotten legal fees by DiMuroGinsberg and Michael Weiser. She hired Heba Carter a lawyer who went to the University of
Richmond.
We have learned the University of Richmond is where in 1987 Judge Donald Kent best friend to Judge Donald Haddock was President
James Comey and Senator Tim Kaine were both adjunct Professors at the same time by all appearance at the University of Richmond.
The lawyers did not show up in court. They did not have to file anything – Judge James Clark was on their side as stated in the below
links
5
June 22, 2016 Janice Circuit Court of the City of Alexandria VA - exposing the corruption - Judge James Clark states he and Carter Land were
Trustee's on all of Burke and Herbert Loans for Friendship as he did on June 8, 2016. That Judge Clark further stated no financial compensation
from Burke and Herbert band directly or indirectly. Which must mean the lawyer representing Burke & Herbert from his law firm would have
had to do it for free - "friendship" still illegal. Janice states this is a "Shame Hearing" - Judge Clark States - "Not on this side" since when does
Judge's take sides? https://youtu.be/Lo5U4FrvdwI
In May of 2016 learned that Judge Clark had a financial relationship - I contacted the FBI and here is the conversation with the FBI that has
ignored it: https://youtu.be/DbdcVaZkItQ
These two videos show that I spoke with Gov. Terry McAuliffe and Brian Moran and showed him my Box of evidence that - that I had been
illegally jailed and tortured https://youtu.be/kQ1hRnaxvRc https://youtu.be/JevLlGOtQBE
June 2016 Burke & Herbert Bank - Lying to me about the subpoena and that he had no idea I was to come today after I had already had a
conversation with another person there. https://youtu.be/gisnNjOgVk0
https://youtu.be/GaNI8TEzWLM and The disclosure of the City Corruption in the finances - Private School $70,000 - for tennis

6
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GDZ8UkJv78I Cato Question where to go for Help with Sydney Powell – Licensed to Lie - On July 25,
shocked by the answer https://youtu.be/GDZ8UkJv78I
We send young men and women into harms way to fight for rights that we no longer have as American Citizens. It is very scary and until you
are involved in a Slippery Slope of the Collusion and Corruption of the Judicial System - it is difficult to understand.


Read more at:

@ProSeAm
ProSeAmerica.net
JAMJustice.org
That on Friday October 21, 2016 DOJ Joesph Guzinski stated very clearly his not investigating the criminal acts and actions was his concern for
his own life, the retaliation and retribution as well as when asked who is supervisor was he stated “The White House” not the Department of
2. On October 11, 2016 - Thomas Gorman (Bankruptcy Court Trustee) was at the table and insisted with this other women - that she had been
ripped off by her lawyer - that he was going to get the DOJ - Joseph Guzinski to investigate.
4. On October 13, 2016 in court. I was 3rd on the docket, at or around 1.25 pm told I would be called by Mr. Gorman in about or within 30
minutes
6. Then Mr. Gorman calls a women's name I unfortunately, did not pay attention to the name - will need to figure it out - DOJ - Mr. Guzinski
goes up - he doesn't want anything to do with it. Mr. Gorman fights for the women - who does not show up in court so losses by default - but,
Mr. Gorman puts on fight to have it continued - to give it time to be investigated - he fights with the Judge that she should be heard. He believes
her and he thinks she was taken advantage of.
7. I ask DOJ Mr. Guzinski to stay in the court, as I am to be heard in the next half hour. He agrees turns around to stay - Mr. Gorman and the
Judge had seen me do this and had looked me in the eye -
8. I believe one of them signaled him not to stay - after he turned around and was on his way to sit - because he then abruptly turned and said he
couldn't. I then asked if he had a card.
7
10. I was then left to be heard at the end. But, it wasn't just the end. The Judge took a break, it was to be 10 minutes, Thomas Gorman went
running out of the court room - I believe and the appearance was to the Judge.
11. It was about a 20-minute break and the hearing started. The hearing was held after 4 pm - after court hours so no one else could hear. The
hearing was bulling to me and the ruling by the Judge was unreasonable with no questions of substance asked of me. At the end I stood and ask
12. I did get Exhibits into the record that show the TRUTH and the corruption. Shows the pattern and practice and the criminal acts and actions.
14. On Friday, October 14, 2016 I filed for the Judge to recuse and Thomas Gorman be removed I file Criminal Claims sheets with back up
against Judge Clark and Ilona Grenadier Heckman. I filed a Notice to be heard and was denied.
Now on Friday, October 21, I have evidence that is confusing and want to meet with him to show it to him, it is time for a meeting
and he is ignoring me. I stop by his office late in the afternoon. He YELLS at me.
That he is not going to meet with me and any information I have e-mail it to him. When I state "This is my Life" in a very calm and
professional manner he states - angry and all red faced yelling at me "NO - THIS IS ABOUT MY LIFE - ME" I was extremely taken
back. shocked - to me it was one more person saying I was a NOBODY.
When I left the office since I had not recorded it - I sat down and wrote the whole thing out, that he was more concerned about himself
and how this would outcome him then me. That he was afraid of the Retaliation and Retribution on him, then what I had been through.
That he wasn't going to help me - because he most likely at or around 50 was to afraid of loosing his pension - is what I wrote. That he
didn't give a shit about me - he was only concerned about himself and the retaliation and retribution against him was not worth doing the
right thing.
15. On Sunday night October 23, 2016 ( and now I am going to work back words with the evidence that shows the collusion of Gov. McAuliffe
and the DOJ / FBI.
16. The two articles released late on the 23rd show the collusion and the payoffs to the officials in the FBI - as everyone knows Terry McAuliffe
was the fund raiser and got Bill Clinton elected to the President. He was supposed to be 1st choice for VP. The plan was he would run for
Governor - and it was just a stepping stone - I have been loud and standing up and speaking out a problem for all of them since 2010. That they
couldn't control. As you can see in the above links
18. http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/2016/10/23/virginia-gov-terry-mcauliffe-donated-467500-to-campaign-of-wife-of-senior-fbi-official-
who-oversaw-clinton-email-probe/
VIRGINIA GOV. TERRY MCAULIFFE DONATED $467,500 TO CAMPAIGN OF WIFE OF SENIOR FBI OFFICIAL WHO OVERSAW
CLINTON EMAIL PROBE
campaign of state senate campaign of the wife of an FBI official. You say why is this a big deal? Because that senior FBI official is Andrew
McCabe who oversaw the Hillary Clinton email probe. Commie Comey’s corruption is looking much more clear these days.
The political organization of Virginia Gov. Terry McAuliffe, an influential Democrat with longstanding ties to Bill and Hillary Clinton, gave
nearly $500,000 to the election campaign of the wife of an official at the Federal Bureau of Investigation who later helped oversee the
investigation into Mrs. Clinton’s email use.
8
Campaign finance records show Mr. McAuliffe’s political-action committee donated $467,500 to the 2015 state Senate campaign of Dr. Jill
McCabe, who is married to Andrew McCabe, now the deputy director of the FBI.
The Virginia Democratic Party, over which Mr. McAuliffe exerts considerable control, donated an additional $207,788 worth of support to Dr.
McCabe’s campaign in the form of mailers, according to the records. That adds up to slightly more than $675,000 to her candidacy from entities
either directly under Mr. McAuliffe’s control or strongly influenced by him. The figure represents more than a third of all the campaign funds Dr.
McCabe raised in the effort.
19. In May of 2016 - Terry McAulliffe was going to be speaking in Alexandria - I decide to show up. My lucky day - the news media for all
stations was following him around like crazy. Not the sound, but, my picture as you can see in this video was everywhere - you will notice the
box and the picture. The box is the box of un-open evidence that I have and the picture is of the Mark Stuart who was hired - under Judge Clark's
direction to help him find me incompetent. When the Alexandria Police were called - I was told the Commonwealth Attorney - Randy Sengel
said they were not allowed to take any police reports from me. Same YouTube as above:
You tube me and Terry McAuliffe https://youtu.be/kQ1hRnaxvRc You will see in this that I am showing him my evidence and the
picture - the media according to them had deleted all the verbal conversation of me and him. This came from ABC

http://freebeacon.com/issues/doj-investigates-mcauliffe-donation-chinese-clinton-backer/ As you can see on my Facebook page most
of the links to this story are corrupt
21. BELOW is a link to the FBI one of the many conversations I have tried to have with them - I caught this one agent off guard - she even gave
her page # - but again she did not ever follow up with me - no matter how many e-mails etc - Unfortunately I was late to the record everything
Above you will see a link to the FBI for 06-08-2016 - with me very comely telling the investigator - what is happening. I also have the e-mails
22. I start googling and doing outlines on all he players and learn the common ground is the University of Richmond and The University of
Richmond law School also known as TC Williams Law School. That in googling adjunct professor you learn they make between $5,000 -
$20,000. I have learned privately they make $35,000 - $50,000
25. James Comey was an Adjunct Professor, since being with the FBI speaks there regularly (Paid), has won awards from the school which
brings gifts, and then paid for commencement speech May of 2016.
o James Comey would then go on to do several interviews with the press that he had put several people in jail for far less then the
o James Comey after Bill Clinton met with Loretta Lynch on the tar mac became the spokes person for stating "HRC did nothing
wrong was just sloppy" in direct conflict of what he had said in the past
The above evidence I believe shows without a doubt the corruption and the purchase of the FBI / DOJ why we can not get any help in our cases
and have nowhere to go for help
26. We also don't want to forget about the cover-up of Michael Gardner and how our Virginia Legislature and the FBI kept silent the removal of
our Supreme Court Justice Cynthia Kinser as she let him out of jail so he could hire ah Hitman to kill the girls.
27. Further in DC you don't want to forget about the removal of Judge Richard Roberts after RAPING a 16 year old Victim – the Judges have
He was closely involved in the Cover-Up of my cases in the District of Columbia Federal Court - He was retired with full benefits and we will all pay
for his fun and freedom for the rest of his life.
9
Sent: Sunday, May 7, 2017 4:03 PM
Wykema.C.Jackson2@usdoj.gov; Noah.Simon@mail.house.gov
Subject: * Re: VICTIMS of Virginia - Breakfast, Lunch, Dinner and a Weekend Getaway buys a Virginia
Judge as The VA Legislature / Courts of Justice Covers it UP
Importance: Low
Good Morning,
Please watch:
be only better and bigger. JW Grenadier Law Day 2017
"Celebrating the People Law Day" https://youtu.be/gskC0LDNf-8

Warmly,
JW Grenadier
ProSeAmerica.net
@ProSeAm
202-368-7178
On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 10:03 AM, ProSe America <proseamerica@gmail.com> wrote:

Good Morning,
Justice.



16-year-old.


• Cynthia Haag
• John Arundel
• John Geer RIP
• Rick Perry
• Deanna Upson
• Edwina Rogers
• Kliegh
• Ashley O'Brien
• Dr Rixsie RIP
• John Doe RIP
• Ron Kirby RIP
• Justin Wolfe
Alexandria
• Brandon Raub
• Renee Walker
• Micheal Field
• Rohini Hughs
• Bev Hennager
• Renae Jennings
• Greg Harrington
• Amy Bird
• Sonia Grenadier
• Scott Subitski
• Lee Farkas

Warmly,
JW Grenadier
@ProSeAm
202-368-7178
Sent: Tuesday, May 9, 2017 10:35 PM
Wykema.C.Jackson2@usdoj.gov; Noah.Simon@mail.house.gov; Isidoro Rodriguez
<business@isidororodriguez.com>; violations@humanrightstribunal.international; Blue Virginia
<info@bluevirginia.us>; jkorman@beankinney.com
Subject: * Re: VICTIMS of Virginia - Breakfast, Lunch, Dinner and a Weekend Getaway buys a Virginia
Judge as The VA Legislature / Courts of Justice Covers it UP
Importance: Low
Looks like Virginia lost it's FBI Protection - You all have been
covering up for Divorce Lawyer Ilona Grenadier Heckman, the
Judiciary, the Government and Elected Officials for years -
Maybe now the JIRC and the VSB will start doing their job,
because just maybe - President Trump is taking over the Mafia-
style criminal enterprise of Virginia -
Empowering Murder for Hire - Those games look like they are
over
Warmly,
JW Grenadier
ProSeAmerica.net
@ProSeAm
202-368-7178
On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 10:03 AM, ProSe America <proseamerica@gmail.com> wrote:

Good Morning,
Justice.



16-year-old.


• Cynthia Haag
• John Arundel
• John Geer RIP
• Rick Perry
• Deanna Upson
• Edwina Rogers
• Kliegh
• Ashley O'Brien
• Dr Rixsie RIP
• John Doe RIP
• Ron Kirby RIP
• Justin Wolfe
Alexandria
• Brandon Raub
• Renee Walker
• Micheal Field
• Rohini Hughs
• Bev Hennager
• Renae Jennings
• Greg Harrington
• Amy Bird
• Sonia Grenadier
• Scott Subitski
• Lee Farkas

Warmly,
JW Grenadier
@ProSeAm
202-368-7178
Sent: Tuesday, May 9, 2017 1:04 PM
To: Davis, Ned <Davis@vsb.org>; doris@cvlas.org; McCauley, Jim <mccauley@vsb.org>; intakereb
<intakereb@vsb.org>
Subject: Divorce Lawyer Ilona Grenadier Heckman and others
Mr. Davis,
Over a month ago you told me you would be getting back to

me by the end of the week - on information or questions. Let
us put on the table what Divorce lawyer Ilona Ely Freedman
Grenadier Heckman did was worse than Glenn Lewis out of her
law firm.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/attorney-glenn-c-
lewis-disbarred-by-virginia-for-numerous-ethical-
violations/2013/05/21/8506c5c2-c240-11e2-914f-
a7aba60512a7_story.html?utm_term=.b1d31a793896#comme
nts
The common denominator in my case and one I have attached

with Jackie - Ben DiMuro represents or is involved in the Cover
Up and thefts of other lawyers. I have attached the document
because it spells out the criminal activity so well, and Jackie and
I share judges and lawyers who have acted criminally.
He and Andrea Mosley in their Malicious prosecution of me.
I spoke with the ABA president last week in Washington

DC. The suggestion she had is a complaint be filed against each
and every one of you who have the knowledge and have not
done your job. Such as the lunch that Mr. McCauley and I had -
she was appalled when she heard about that, and saw the FB
conversation, and learned of his activity to Cover Up criminal
enterprise. She also was concerned of the ignoring of a lawyer
doing work in a state he is not licensed in, to help the criminal
spree and enterprise that is being allowed in the Virginia
Judiciary.
I would like an update by the end of the day and if you need
any other information from me?
Warmly,
JW Grenadier

1 Corinthians 13:13
In The
Supreme Court of Virginia

______________________
RECORD NO. __________

______________________
JACQUELINE BOGLE MEUSE, individually and derivatively on behalf of

ALEXANDRIA INVESTMENTS, LLC, BOGLE INDUSTRIES, INC., KING
STREET METRO VENTURE, LLC, 4607 EISENHOWER ASSOCIATES,
LLC, 4601 EISENHOWER ASSOCIATES, LLC, and THE IRREVOCABLE
BOGLE TRUST,
Petitioners – Appellants,
v.
BRUCE HENRY, individually and as the Co-Trustee of the Irrevocable Bogle

Trust, the Manager of Alexandria Investments, LLC, the Manager of King
Street Metro Venture, LLC, the Manager of 4607 Eisenhower Associates, LLC,
and the Manager of 4601 Eisenhower Associates, LLC, PAUL MACDONALD,
individually and as a Director and Officer of Bogle Industries, Inc., and as the
Trustee of the Irrevocable Bogle Trust, NANCY FIFE, HENRY &
O’DONNELL, P.C., and DONNA H. HENRY,
Respondents – Appellees.
_________________________
BRIEF AMICI CURIAE OF LECTURERS AND PROFESSORS IN ETHICS IN

THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA LAW SCHOOLS IN SUPPORT OF
GRANTING THE PETITION FOR APPEAL
_________________________
William T. Woodrow III (VSB No. 88122)

STONE & WOODROW LLP
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902
(855) 275-7378 (Telephone)
(646) 873-7529 (Facsimile)
Counsel for Amici Curiae

THE LEX GROUP  1108 East Main Street  Suite 1400  Richmond, VA 23219
(804) 644-4419  (800) 856-4419  Fax: (804) 644-3660  www.thelexgroup.com
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
TABLE OF AUTHORITIES .........................................................................iii
I. INTEREST OF THE AMICI ................................................................ 1
II. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................... 2

BELOW, AND STATEMENT OF FACTS ........................................... 4
IV. ARGUMENT ...................................................................................... 4
A. The Alexandria Investments Operating Agreement

(“AIOA”) Reflects A Violation Of Rule 1.8(A) And 1.8(H),
Both In The Document Itself And In The Circumstances
Of Its Adoption .......................................................................... 7
1. The Terms of the AIOA Were Not Fair and

Reasonable ..................................................................... 8
2. Consent in Writing ......................................................... 11
3. Bruce Henry Limited His Liability For Malpractice

With A Forfeiture Clause That Would Trigger Even
Against A Successful Claim ........................................... 11
B. The AIOA Is Void As Against Public Policy ............................. 12
1. The Forfeiture Clause Is Unconscionable ...................... 13
2. A Forfeiture Clause Cannot Abrogate The Law ............. 15
C. No Free Right To Contract This Forfeiture Clause .................. 18
D. The Buck Stops at the Virginia Supreme Court ....................... 18
VI. CONCLUSION .................................................................................... 18
i
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE .................................................................... 21
ATTACHMENT A
ii
TABLE OF AUTHORITIES
Page(s)
CASES
Byars v. Stone,
186 Va. 518 (1947) .......................................................................... 16
Cartos v. Hartford Acci. & Indem, Co.,

160 Va. 505 (1933) .......................................................................... 12
Dissolution of Validation Review Associates [Berkun],

223 AD2d 134, 646 NYS2d 149 (2nd Dept. 2001) ........................... 17
Dunford Roofing v. Dunford,

2001 WL 396869 (W. D. Va. 2001) .................................................. 15
Flippo v. CSC Associates III, L.L.C.,

262 Va. 48 (2001) ............................................................................ 15
Giannotti v. Hamway,
239 Va. 14 (1990) ............................................................................ 15
Heinzman v. Fine, Fine, Legum Fine,

217 Va. 958 (1977) .......................................................................... 13
Hume v. United States,

132 U.S. 406 (1889) ........................................................................ 13
Krippner v. Matz,
205 Minn. 497, 287 N.W. 19 (1939) ................................................. 13
LK Operating, LLC v. Collection Grp., LLC,

331 P.3d 1147 (Wash. 2014) ........................................................... 12
Musselman v. Willoughby Corp.,

230 Va. 337 (1985) .......................................................................... 16
iii
Philyaw v. Platinum Enters.,
54 Va. Cir. 364 (Spotsylvania Cnty. Jan. 9, 2001)............................ 13
Remora Investments, L. L. C. v. Orr,

277 Va. 316 (2009) .................................................................... 15, 16
Simmons v. Miller,
261 Va. 561 (2001) .................................................................... 15, 16
W.R. Grace & Co. v. Local Union 759, Int’l Union of United Rubber,
461 U.S. 757 (1983) ........................................................................ 13
Youngwall v. Youngwall Realty, LLC, et al.,

Supreme Court of the State of New York for Nassau County,
New York, Short Form Order,
Index No. 22266/07 (June 24, 2008)........................................... 16-17
Yukon Pocahontas Coal Co. v. Consolidation Coal Co.,

72 Va. Cir. 75 (Buchanan 2006)....................................................... 12
STATUTES
Va. Code § 13.1-1023 ............................................................................... 10
Va. Code § 13.1-1023.1 .............................................................................. 8
Va. Code § 13.1-1024 ............................................................................... 14
Va. Code § 13.1-1024.1 .............................................................................. 8
Va. Code § 13.1-1025 ................................................................................. 8
Va. Code § 13.1-1028 ................................................................................. 8
Va. Code § 13.1-1028C .............................................................................. 9
iv
RULES
Va. Sup. Ct. R. 5:30(b)(2) ........................................................................... 1
VCPR 1.7.................................................................................................. 16
VCPR 1.7(b)(1) ......................................................................................... 16
VCPR 1.7(b)(4) ......................................................................................... 16
VCPR 1.8........................................................................................ 7, 18, 19
VCPR 1.8(a) ...................................................................................... passim
VCPR 1.8(a)(3) ......................................................................................... 11
VCPR 1.8(h) ......................................................................................... 7, 19
OTHER AUTHORITIES
LE Op. 1606 ............................................................................................. 17
Lyman Johnson, Delaware’s Non-Waivable Duties,

91 Boston Univ. L.R. 701 (2011) ............................................................... 18
v
I. INTEREST OF THE AMICI1
ramifications upon the practice of law in Virginia, and the manner in which it
could practically impact the application of the Virginia Rules of Professional
Conduct (“VRPC”). Specifically, whether Virginia courts will uphold
arbitration orders when the arbitrators clearly ignore or disregard egregious
violations of the VRPC in reaching their decision, and the message this
sends to the profession.
Amici curiae, consisting of former and current ethics professors
from Virginia law schools, respectfully move for leave of Court to file the
accompanying brief under Virginia Supreme Court Rule 5:30 in support of
the Petition for Appeal. In support whereof, the amici say as follows:
1
Pursuant to Rule 5:30(b)(2), the Petitioners but not the Respondents have
consented to the filing of this brief amicus curiae. A list of the Amici is
included at Attachment A. The Amici all are currently or have recently
taught professional responsibility at a law school in the Commonwealth.
The Petitioner has contributed resources towards the preparation of this
Brief, consistent with the practice of Amicus briefs in this Court. Counsel to
the Amicus Curiae has taken external advice and followed what it believes
are appropriate steps under the Virginia Code of Professional
Responsibility for the waiver of conflicts and acting zealously for the Amici
herein. No Amici were involved in the arbitration or the confirmation of the
award in Circuit Court. Mr. Stone and Mr. Woodrow served as counsel to
the Petitioner after the final award was confirmed in order to pursue
settlement discussions and then to bond the underlying proceedings for
appeal and suspend enforcement. Their engagement terminated on April
25, 2017.
1
The amici are:
• George M. Cohen, Professor of Law, University of Virginia
• Thatcher A. Stone, Lecturer in Law, University of Virginia
and lawyer in private practice
• Victoria S. Sahani, Associate Professor of Law,
Washington & Lee University
ramifications upon the practice of law in Virginia and the teaching of legal
ethics. Specifically, this case raises the question whether Virginia courts
will uphold arbitration orders when the arbitrators clearly ignore or
disregard egregious violations of the Virginia Rules of Professional Conduct
in reaching their decision. The amici believe that the duty rests ultimately
with this Court to police the Virginia legal community. The fear that this
important responsibility could be usurped and tarnished by the misguided
actions of an arbitration panel, and our general concern with ensuring that
Virginia lawyers and our students uphold the highest ethical standards,
motivate the amici to write.
II. INTRODUCTION
The facts of this case read as if they came straight from the sort of
nightmare hypothetical encountered in a law school ethics class exam:
2
Bruce Henry, a Virginia attorney, enthroned himself as the lifelong
manager of an LLC, Alexandria Investments (“AI”) – his legal client –
bestowing upon himself the right to pass his position on to his heirs and
immunizing himself from all challenges to his behavior, excepting solely
that of a successful action of removal for cause. Even if he were to steal
from or defraud the LLC, the client was barred from any monetary remedy.
Bruce Henry accomplished this feat by drafting a clause for the new
Alexandria Investments Operating Agreement that he was demanding, and
that resulted in the complete and immediate expulsion of a Member if she
dared even to initiate any action for any remedy (other than removal for
cause) against Bruce Henry’s wrongful conduct. The clause would operate
even in the event that the action proved to be successful. Bruce Henry, the
Attorney for AI, drafted that self-serving, unfair and unreasonable clause for
the benefit of Bruce Henry, the Guarantor of a loan to a related LLC and he
did it with the full blessing of Bruce Henry, the manager of AI. No party to
the operating agreement ever consented in writing. Bruce Henry, in the
proceedings below, invoked that self-serving and unfair clause that facially
contravenes this Court’s Rules. The arbitrators and the Circuit Court, in
violation of public policy and in usurping this Court’s sole authority for
regulating attorney conduct, enforced the clause and took away a
3
Member’s 50% ownership interest because she, on behalf of all members,
derivatively, initiated a challenge to Bruce Henry’s conduct as lawyer (and
LLC manager) and to the forfeiture clause itself. To protect the citizens of
this Commonwealth and to uphold the high standards to which lawyers
educated and licensed in the Commonwealth should be held, this Court
should reverse and vacate the award.

BELOW, AND STATEMENT OF FACTS
The Amici adopt the Nature of the Case, Material Proceedings Below,
and Statement of Facts set forth in the Petition for Appeal filed by the
Petitioners.
IV. ARGUMENT2
This case presents an important and necessary opportunity for this
Court to consider and clarify whether it will allow an arbitration panel and
the Circuit Court to dismiss and downplay outright violations of the Virginia
Code of Professional Responsibility (VCPR) in furtherance of a ruling that
2
Amici have been unable to confirm that the entire record from the City of
Alexandria Circuit Court was properly available to the Supreme Court at the
time this brief was due to be filed. Accordingly in some instances where
factual assertions are made, amici base them upon similar assertions made
in either the expert report of Lyman Johnson, Plaintiff’s Memorandum in
Opposition to Sanctions and Fees, or Plaintiffs' Response To The “Joint
Motion Of The Defendants And The Bogle Entities To Confirm Arbitration
And Enter Final Judgment" And Plaintiffs' Application To Vacate Arbitration
Award.
4
affronts Virginia public policy or whether the Court will protect the public
and the integrity of the bar, by upholding the VCPR despite the Arbitrators’
neglect and error.
Specifically, the issue is whether an arbitration order is void as
against public policy when it enforces a membership interest forfeiture
clause in an LLC Operating Agreement (the “Forfeiture Clause”) that is
triggered by the mere seeking of any monetary or equitable or fiduciary
remedy (in arbitration or in court) against a wrongdoing manager (other
than an action solely for removal for cause), even if that manager were to
steal LLC funds or knowingly commit deliberate fraud where, as in this
case:
(i) Bruce Henry organized and represented the LLC, AI, that was bound
by the Forfeiture Clause;
(ii) Bruce Henry, who drafted the Forfeiture Clause, is also the
beneficiary of the Clause because he is the sole manager of AI (a
condition that he also demanded);
(iii) AI, the LLC client, did not consent to the Forfeiture Clause in writing;
(iv) The sole initial member of AI, Jack Bogle, did not consent to the
Forfeiture Clause in writing;
5
(v) Bruce Henry did not inform Meuse of the existence of AI (and her
50% interest) until after her father died in 2012; and
(vi) The Forfeiture Clause purports to protect Bruce Henry from all
challenges, other than removal for cause, whether they be based on
statute or common law, equity or fiduciary responsibility, in a way that
is not fair and reasonable for the LLC nor the assignees nor their
transferees and also in a way that clearly violates public policy.
The draconian forfeiture provision reads:
11.01 Forfeiture. If any Member(s) shall, directly or indirectly,

contest or dispute before any tribunal (including without
limitation that contemplated by Section 10.01 of this
Agreement) the exercise by the Managers of their powers
hereunder or call into question before any tribunal the validity,
legality or enforceability of any of the provisions of this
Agreement, then, such Member(s) shall be expelled from the
Company and shall cease to have any Membership Interest or
any of the other rights, status or privileges of a Member, but
such former Member(s) shall not be released or discharged
from any of the obligations of a Member under the provisions of
this Agreement unless provided otherwise by the affirmative
vote (or written consent) of the Managers taken in accordance
with the provisions of Article IV; provided, however, the
foregoing forfeiture provision shall not apply to any Member
who has prevailed on the merits of an action seeking solely to
remove for cause the Designated Manager or any successor
Manager designated by him.
6
A. The Alexandria Investments Operating Agreement (“AIOA”)
Reflects A Violation Of Rule 1.8(A) And 1.8(H), Both In The Document
Itself And In The Circumstances Of Its Adoption
VCPR 1.8 provides in pertinent part as follows:
(a) A lawyer shall not enter into a business transaction with a

client or knowingly acquire an ownership, possessory, security
or other pecuniary interest adverse to a client unless:
(1) the transaction and terms on which the lawyer acquires the
interest are fair and reasonable to the client and are fully
disclosed and transmitted in writing to the client in a manner
which can be reasonably understood by the client;
(2) the client is given a reasonable opportunity to seek the
advice of independent counsel in the transaction; and
(3) the client consents in writing thereto.
....
(h) A lawyer shall not make an agreement prospectively limiting

the lawyer’s liability to a client for malpractice, except that a
lawyer may make such an agreement with a client of which the
lawyer is an employee as long as the client is independently
represented in making the agreement.
Bruce Henry was bound to comply with the requirements of Rule
1.8(a) because he was simultaneously acting as the LLC’s attorney and
serving as the LLC’s manager. Henry would be compensated by the LLC
for his role as a manager, which is a “transaction” with a client, and Henry
drafted a provision that would redound to his pecuniary benefit to the
potential detriment of the LLC client. The attorney bound by Rule 1.8
carries the burden of proof that he complied with it, yet Bruce Henry did not
offer any evidence that the Rule’s conditions were met. He did not even
7
argue that the Forfeiture Clause was fair; he just made the specious
argument that Jack Bogle wanted it. A claim that was belied by the clear
documentary evidence that it was he who demanded and imposed the
condition.
1. The Terms of the AIOA Were Not Fair and Reasonable
The Forfeiture Clause and enforcement contravene longstanding,
fundamental, unalterable principles of Virginia LLC law, including Va. Code
13.1-1023.1,13.1-1024.1,13.1-1025 and 13.1-1028. The Clause effectively
renders the attorney-manager immune as a fiduciary from any legal
accountability whether under statute or common law. Any action by any
Member, acting either on the Member’s own behalf (“directly”) or on behalf
of the LLC (“indirectly”), that challenges Mr. Henry’s conduct and seeks any
remedy other than the removal of Mr. Henry for cause would trigger the
Clause upon the moment of filing. Even the one action (removal for cause)
that does not trigger the Clause automatically is greatly discouraged by the
risk of a Member losing her entire interest if unsuccessful.
If the Clause is triggered, not only does a Member lose automatically
her entire Membership Interest in the LLC and all membership rights, the
other Member, who may agree that Mr. Henry’s behavior is wrongful,
nonetheless has no incentive to join any challenge because the second
8
Member stands to potentially gain the entire membership interest of the
LLC by remaining silent. This forfeiture coupled with the accompanying
unjust enrichment creates a perverse incentive never to challenge Mr.
Henry’s conduct even if it is illegal or criminal. The unjust Operating
Agreement, coupled with the insulating Forfeiture Clause, bestows on
Henry complete control of the business with almost zero accountability, a
lifetime of this despotic condition, plus assured succession to his wife or
whomever she might appoint after his death.
Of course LLC draftsmen, managers and members have freedom of
contract to arrange their affairs, but under Virginia statutory and decisional
law the statutory managerial standard of conduct cannot be altered, no
exculpation for willful or knowing misconduct is contractually permitted, and
access to records cannot be denied. See for example, Va. Code 13.1-
1028C. Moreover, strikingly here, Section 5.11 of the Operating Agreement
specifically provides that Mr. Henry, as manager, is not exculpated from
willful misconduct, but this provision is rendered mere lip service by the
accompanying Forfeiture Clause.
The Forfeiture Clause unfairly and unreasonably restricts  upon
pain of forfeiting a Member’s entire ownership interest and rights in the LLC
 one (or all) Member(s), and the LLC itself, from pursuing, in both
9
arbitration and in court, any money damages or equitable remedy against
the wrongdoing manager (other than removal) even if he steals LLC funds,
commits intentional fraud, deliberately destroys or wastes LLC assets, or
engages in any other egregious misconduct.
The Forfeiture Clause prevents a Member, and the LLC itself, from
acting to recover, in both arbitration and in court, monetary damages
caused by a willfully or knowingly misbehaving LLC manager, in
contravention of Virginia LLC law, equity, and public policy.
The Forfeiture Clause precludes a Member, and the LLC itself, from
seeking injunctive or other equitable relief against a willfully or knowingly
misbehaving LLC manager to prevent or halt such misconduct, in
contravention of Virginia LLC law, equity, and public policy. See, e.g., Va.
Code 13.1-1023.
The Forfeiture Clause unfairly and unreasonably prohibits an LLC
(and any or all of its members acting on its behalf) from pursuing or
initiating a petition for dissolution of the LLC based on willful or knowing
manager misconduct, in contravention of Virginia LLC law, equity, and
public policy.
The Forfeiture Clause was unfairly and unreasonably exercised in
this case when Meuse on behalf of all members brought a derivative action
10
on behalf of AI to assess alleged wrongs, and in addition to denying access
to evidence as pointed out in Appellant’s brief, Bruce Henry exercised the
Forfeiture Clause to oust Meuse as a member from AI, at a loss of millions
of dollars in value.
2. Consent in Writing
The undisputed evidence in this case is that no party to the AIOA
communicated their consent to the agreement in writing as required by
VCPR 1.8(a)(3). There is no written consent by the LLC client itself,
whether from a disinterested person acting on behalf of the LLC or from
Jack Bogle; there is no written consent from Jackie Meuse; there is no
written consent from Nancy Fife; there is no written consent from anyone.
3. Bruce Henry Limited His Liability For Malpractice With A Forfeiture

Clause That Would Trigger Even Against A Successful Claim
The arbitrators held, inexplicably, that “the AI Operating Agreement
limits suits against Henry in his capacity as manager. It does not purport to
limit claims of attorney malpractice.” This was truly a baffling finding for a
number of reasons, not least of which was the fact that Henry himself
invoked the forfeiture provision in the context of Meuse suing him for
malpractice on behalf of Alexandria Investments. Moreover, as manager of
the LLC, Mr. Henry would not sue himself for malpractice on the LLC’s
behalf.
11
B. The AIOA Is Void As Against Public Policy
Agreements that violate the VRPC, violate public policy and are void.
Yukon Pocahontas Coal Co. v. Consolidation Coal Co., 72 Va. Cir. 75, 103
(Buchanan 2006) (“Moreover because the agreement violates the Virginia
Rules of Professional Conduct, the Agreement violates public policy and is
void.”) This conclusion has been established in Virginia and in sister
states. LK Operating, LLC v. Collection Grp., LLC, 331 P.3d 1147, 1163
(Wash. 2014) (“[c]ontracts formed in violation of the RPCs are
unenforceable to the extent that they contravene public policy,” and finding
here that a violation of Rule 1.8(a) violates public policy).
“Forfeitures are never favored either at law or in equity, and
provisions for a forfeiture are strictly construed against the party for whose
benefit they are inserted.” Cartos v. Hartford Acci. & Indem, Co., 160 Va.
505, 518 (1933).
A forfeiture, then, inserted into an agreement between a lawyer and
his client must be scrutinized with even greater vigor.
“(I)t is a misconception to attempt to force an agreement

between an attorney and his client into the conventional modes
of commercial contracts. While such a contract may have
similar attributes, the agreement is, essentially, in a
classification peculiar to itself. Such an agreement is permeated
with the paramount relationship of attorney and client which
necessarily affects the rights and duties of each.”
12
Heinzman v. Fine, Fine, Legum Fine, 217 Va. 958, 962-63 (1977) (quoting
Krippner v. Matz, 205 Minn. 497, 506, 287 N.W. 19, 24 (1939)).
Matters of public policy are for the courts to decide, not arbitrators.
W.R. Grace & Co. v. Local Union 759, Int’l Union of United Rubber, 461
U.S. 757, 766 (1983)(“the question of public policy is ultimately one for
resolution by the courts.”) (review of arbitration decision).
1. The Forfeiture Clause Is Unconscionable
The Court should void as a matter of public policy an agreement
made between a lawyer and his client that fails to meet the fairness
standard established by Rule 1.8(a). The question here is not even close.
In fact the Forfeiture Clause is so unfair that it is unconscionable – a far
heightened standard of unfairness than what is necessary to establish a
Rule 1.8(a) violation.
Unconscionability is concerned with the intrinsic fairness of the

terms of the agreement in relation to all attendant
circumstances. It has been said that an agreement is
unconscionable if no person in his senses would make it on the
one hand and no fair and honest person would accept it on the
other.
Philyaw v. Platinum Enters., 54 Va. Cir. 364, 367 (Spotsylvania Cnty. Jan.
9, 2001) (citing Hume v. United States, 132 U.S. 406 (1889) (finding an
unconscionable arbitration provision unenforceable).
13
No person in their senses would agree to forfeit their interest in a
company and agree to remain indefinitely liable for any number of unknown
future obligations simply for pointing out in official proceedings the manager
had stolen assets or breached a statutory or common law duty. Moreover,
no person in their senses would agree that he can never challenge the
manager (who does not even own an interest in the LLC) without forfeiting
his interests. To illustrate the unconscionable nature of this provision – if
Meuse and Fife together challenged Henry’s actions, Henry would enforce
this provision against them both and there would be NO members left to
ever challenge him again, but they would remain liable for all of his actions
and those of his successors (his wife) until they die. Thus, Henry would
essentially own and control the company, and have responsibility
exclusively for dissolution, creditors’ rights, and solvency. Even worse,
Henry is a lawyer, Alexandria Investments is his client, and Henry and
Henry & O’Donnell drafted this provision to benefit Henry. It goes without
saying that no fair and honest person would accept this forfeiture provision.
The Member whose interest was obtained by assignment from her father
before the Forfeiture Clause came into effect never consented to it in
writing or even saw the Operating Agreement in which the Clause appears.
14
2. A Forfeiture Clause Cannot Abrogate The Law
In his capacity as the Manager of Alexandria Investments, Henry was
subject to the Virginia Limited Liability Company Act, decisional law, and
the AIOA. The Virginia Supreme Court has likened the standards
applicable to an LLC Manager to those of a corporate director. Flippo v.
CSC Associates III, L.L.C., 262 Va. 48, 56-57 (2001); Remora Investments,
L. L. C. v. Orr, 277 Va. 316, 321-22 (2009). Thus, the “good faith business
judgment” statutory standard under Virginia’s LLC Act (Va. Code Ann.
§ 13.1-1024) applies only to actual business judgments made on behalf of
the LLC itself- Flippo, 262 Va. at 57 (citing authority) and Simmons v.
Miller, 261 Va. 561 at 577 (2001) - and does not apply where an LLC
Manager, similar to a corporate director, engages in self-dealing, such as
by causing the LLC to make payments to, or for the benefit of, the Manager
or his affiliates, whether in the form of management fees or attorney fees or
otherwise. Giannotti v. Hamway, 239 Va. 14, 24-25 (1990); Dunford
Roofing v. Dunford, 2001 WL 396869 (W. D. Va. 2001) (Virginia
corporation guarantee of a director- stockholder obligation voided as a
conflict of interest transaction). No Virginia Supreme Court decision has
ever held that an LLC manager’s statutory or common law fiduciary duty
can be extinguished by agreement.
15
As attorney for Alexandria Investments, Henry and his law firm also
owed the LLC’s a fiduciary duty of utmost good faith, fidelity, and fairness,
as well as a duty of exercising reasonable care. Byars v. Stone, 186 Va.
518, 529 (1947). This includes an obligation not to act adversely to the
interests of his client without client knowledge and consent.3 Id. No consent
was ever given by Alexandria Investments, or its Members, to Henry’s
extensive self-dealing because neither Jack Bogle nor Meuse nor Fife ever
consented. Henry also owed a duty to make full disclosure of material
information to the client. Musselman v. Willoughby Corp., 230 Va. 337, 343
(1985).
The forfeiture clause attempts to abrogate membership rights that
were established by statute and refined through decisional law and seeks
to remove accountability for breaching fiduciary duties – also established
by statute and decisional law – that attorneys and LLC management owe
their clients and members. This is an impermissible use of a forfeiture
clause that operates against Virginia public policy, decisional law and the
Va. Code. Orr and Simmons. Other states are in accord. See, Youngwall
3
This is also a problem under Rule 1.7. There is a potential personal
interest conflict between the lawyer and the client. The lawyer is by virtue of
the Clause effectively having the client agree to an advance waiver of this
conflict, which is unenforceable under Rule 1.7(b)(1) and (b)(4). To raise
the conflict problem would potentially call into dispute Henry’s role as a
manager.
16
v. Youngwall Realty, LLC, et al., Supreme Court of the State of New York
for Nassau County, New York, Short Form Order dated June 24, 2008,
Index No. 22266/07 (Forfeiture clause prohibiting the pursuit of judicial
dissolution of LLC held unenforceable because judicial dissolution is a
statutory right.); Dissolution of Validation Review Associates [Berkun], 223
AD2d 134, 646 NYS2d 149 (2nd Dept. 2001)(provision within shareholders
agreement to waive statutory and common-law right to petition for judicial
dissolution was unenforceable as against public policy evidenced by
statute).
Further, the Clause effectively constrains what should be the client’s
unfettered right to terminate the lawyer-client relationship, imposing a
penalty of forfeiting a member’s entire ownership interest in the LLC on a
decision to terminate the relationship by making a claim against the lawyer.
Such a penalty also violates public policy and the Clause should be
rendered unenforceable by this unreasonable impairment of the client’s
right to end the lawyer-client relationship. See LE Op. 1606 (“A client
retains the absolute right to discharge the lawyer at any time for any reason
or without reason”).
17
C. No Free Right To Contract This Forfeiture Clause
Any attempt to characterize the Forfeiture Clause as an element of
free rights to contract as the parties may do so, now popular in Delaware
Chancery actions involving LLC’s, must fail because Virginia has no law
similar to Delaware permitting such departures from equity’s imposition of
fiduciary duties through contract in LLC’s. See, Lyman Johnson,
Delaware’s Non-Waivable Duties, 91 Boston Univ. L.R. 701 (2011). Virginia
is not Delaware and fiduciary duties may not be eliminated in Virginia.
D. The Buck Stops at the Virginia Supreme Court
The Virginia Supreme Court promulgates the VCPR to determine the
propriety or impropriety of attorney conduct. This Court also has the final
power to supervise lawyer conduct in the Commonwealth. Review of this
arbitration award would be an exercise of that power and a reassurance to
current and future members of the Virginia Bar that the high standards and
ideals to which they adhere and to which every aspiring Virginia lawyer is
exhorted will not be allowed to fade and tarnish on this Court’s watch.
VI. CONCLUSION
The award and confirmation thereof should be vacated as requested
in the Appellant’s brief, because the arbitration panel failed to properly
identify and give weight to the issues arising under VCPR 1.8. This failure
18
directly impacted the award and resulted in Meuse losing all of her property
rights in Alexandria Investments. The Forfeiture Clause is not fair and
reasonable, its substance and implementation broke every provision in
VCPR 1.8(a) and (h), and it operates in violation of Virginia public policy
and is unconscionable.
The courts, not arbitrators, are the ones to determine if there has
been a violation of CPR 1.8 such that the forfeiture Clause is void and
unenforceable. This court should find such a violation and Meuse should
be restored to her membership in AI. Her fees and expenses bringing her
derivative action on behalf of all members should also be addressed. If the
Court fails to serve justice in this case, then no justice will be done. A
disheartening message will be sent to the watching Virginia Bar and those
who teach legal ethics will be at a loss to explain to their students how such
conduct could be ignored by the courts.
19
Respectfully Submitted,
William T. Woodrow III, Esq. (VSBN 88122)

Stone & Woodrow LLP
Charlottesville, VA 22902
Ph. (855) 275-7378
Fax (646) 873-7529
Counsel for Amici Curiae.
20
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I certify that, on this 2nd day of May, 2017, a copy of this Brief of
Amici Curiae was served, via U.S. Mail, postage prepaid, upon:
William H. Hurd John H. Craddock, Jr.

Stephen C. Piepgrass Michele Burke Craddock
TROUTMAN SANDERS LLP CRADDOCK LAW PLC
1001 Haxall Point 2304 West Main Street
Richmond, Virginia 23219 Richmond, Virginia 23220
william.hurd@troutmansanders.com jcraddock@craddocklawfirm.com
stephen.piepgrass@troutmansanders.com mcraddock@craddocklawfirm.com
(804) 697-1335 (804) 309-4200
(804) 697-1320
Counsel for Petitioners-Appellants Counsel for Petitioners-Appellants
Stephen M. Sayers Robert E. Scully, Jr.

Arthur E. Schmalz STITES & HARBISON, PLLC
Erin P. Thompson 1199 N. Fairfax Street, Suite 900
HUNTON & WILLIAMS LLP Alexandria, VA 22314
1751 Pinnacle Drive, Suite 1700 Telephone: (703) 837-3929
McLean, VA 22102 rscully@stites.com
Telephone: (703) 714-7400
ssayers@hunton.com - and –
aschmalz@hunton.com
Michael P. DeGrandis
ethompson@hunton.com
DEGRANDIS LAW OFFICE PLLC
Counsel for Defendant Bruce W. Old Gallows Road, Suite 350
Henry Vienna, VA 22182
Telephone: (703) 752-6269
mdegrandis@degrandislaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Paul

Macdonald
21
Thomas M. Buchanan Michael J. Holleran
WINSTON & STRAWN LLP Evan M. Stepanick
1700 K Street NW WALTON & ADAMS, P.C.
Washington, DC 20006 1925 Isaac Newton Square, Suite
Telephone: (202) 282-5000 250
tbuchana@winston.com Reston, VA 20190
Telephone: (703) 790-8000
Counsel for Defendant Nancy Fife mholleran@walton-adams.com
estepanick@walton-adams.com
Counsel for Defendant Donna H

Henry
John O. Easton Robert J. Stoney

Carol T. Stone William B. Porter
JORDAN COYNE LLP BLANKINGSHIP & KEITH, P.C.
10509 Judicial Drive, Suite 200 4020 University Drive, Suite 300
Fairfax, VA 22030 Fairfax, VA 22030
Telephone: (703) 246-0900 Telephone: (703) 691-1235
Facsimile: (703) 591-3673 Facsimile: (703) 691-3913
c.stone@jocs-law.com rstoney@bklawva.com
j.easton@jocs-law.com wporter@bklawva.com
Counsel for Defendant Henry & Counsel for Alexandria Investments,

O’Donnell, P.C. LLC; King Street Metro Venture,
LLC; and 4607 Eisenhower
Associates, LLC
Bernard J. DiMuro
Stacey Rose Harris
DIMUROGINSBERG, PC
Telephone: (703) 684-4333
Facsimile: (703) 548-3181
bdimuro@dimuro.com
sharris@dimuro.com
Counsel for Bogle Industries, Inc.
22
William T. Woodrow III
23
ATTACHMENT A
FǺČŲĿȚỲ
Faculty Search s
George M. Cohen
Břǿķǻẅ Přǿfěșșǿř ǿf Čǿřpǿřǻțě Ŀǻẅ
Ěmǻįŀ
ģmč3ỳ@vįřģįňįǻ.ěđų
Pħǿňě
(434) 924-3814
Řǿǿm
ẄB171Ǻ
Ǻșșįșțǻňț
Ķǻřěň Șǿẅěřș
Ħį-řěș Pħǿțǿ
ĚXPĚŘȚİȘĚ
Čǿňțřǻčțș
Přǿfěșșįǿňǻŀ řěșpǿňșįbįŀįțỳ
Ǻģěňčỳ ǻňđ pǻřțňěřșħįp
Ŀǻẅ ǻňđ ěčǿňǿmįčș
Biography
Publications
Courses
Media
George Cohen joined the faculty in 1993 as an associate professor of law after a oneyear visit to the Law School. He became a full
professor in 1995. He teaches contracts, professional responsibility and agency and partnership. He has also taught antitrust and
law and economics.
A summa cum laude and Phi Beta Kappa graduate of Yale University, Cohen earned his J.D. in 1986 and a Ph.D. in economics in
1992 from the University of Pennsylvania. During law school, he served as articles editor of the University of Pennsylvania Law
Review. Cohen was a clerk to Judge Walter K. Stapleton of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit in Wilmington,
Delaware, before joining the law faculty at the University of Pittsburgh in 1988.
Cohen was chair of the UVA Faculty Senate from 201213 and has served as an ethics consultant and expert for several law firms.
ĚĐŲČǺȚİǾŇ
J.D., University of Pennsylvania Law School, 1986
Ph.D., University of Pennsylvania, 1992
B.A., Yale University, 1982

For Faculty/Staff | For Students
Calendar | Directory | Contact Us
Search: Search Go
Academics
Admissions
Alumni and Giving
Career Strategy
Faculty
Law Library
News and Media
W&L Home
Law Home > Faculty
Victoria Shannon Sahani
Associate Professor of Law
B.A., Harvard University; J.D., Harvard Law School.
Biography
Email: sahaniv@wlu.edu
Victoria Shannon Sahani is an Associate Professor of Law at Washington and
Office: 445 Sydney Lewis Lee University School of Law. She received the Lewis Prize for Excellence in
Hall Legal Scholarship given by the Francis Lewis Law Center in 2014 and the
Phone: 5404588016 Law Alumni Faculty Fellowship Award for Teaching in 2015. Her articles and
Fax: 5404588488 essays have been or will be published in the UCLA Law Review, the Tulane
Law Review, the Cardozo Law Review, the Tennessee Journal of Business
Biography
Law, and the Journal of International Arbitration. Her scholarship examines
Publications innovations in international and domestic dispute resolution, like thirdparty
SSRN Page
financing. She currently teaches or has previously taught civil procedure,
Curriculum Vitae alternative dispute resolution, professional responsibility, and international
investment treaty arbitration. She is an expert on all aspects of domestic and
international dispute resolution procedures, including civil procedure,
negotiation, mediation, domestic arbitration, international arbitration, and
investment treaty arbitration. She also previously served as an Adjunct
Professor at Fordham Law School where she cotaught “Introduction to
Investment Arbitration.”
In addition to authoring several articles, essays, and blog posts, Professor
Sahani is working on the second edition of her 2012 book entitled ThirdParty
Funding in International Arbitration (2012: Wolters Kluwer). She is also
working on a chapter discussing thirdparty funders as stakeholders in
international arbitration for the forthcoming book entitled Cambridge
Compendium of International Commercial and Investment Arbitration (Andrea
Bjorklund, Franco Ferrari & Stefan Kröll eds., Cambridge University Press)
(forthcoming in 2017). She also previously published a book chapter entitled
“The 2012 ICC Rules of Arbitration” in Contemporary Issues in International
Arbitration and Mediation: The Fordham Papers (2011), Arthur Rovine, ed.
(2012: Brill / Martinus Nijhoff Publishers).
Professor Sahani is a Member of the Academic Council of the Institute for
Transnational Arbitration (ITA), made up of the top academics in the field of
international arbitration from around the globe, and the Task Force on Third
Party Funding jointly organized by the International Council for Commercial
Arbitration (ICCA), which is the premier international commercial arbitration
policy and membership organization, and Queen Mary University of London.
The mission of the Task Force is to develop guidelines and norms for third
party funding by bringing together leading thirdparty funders, State parties,
private parties, arbitrators, counsel, arbitral institutions, leading academics in
the field, and representatives from trade and regulatory authorities, such as
national bar associations, the Civil Justice Council, the Association of
Litigation Funders, the International Bar Association, and the American Bar
Association (ABA) Section on International Law. She is also a Member of the
Advisory Council of the Alliance for Responsible Consumer Legal Funding
(ARC Legal Funding), which is a multistakeholder alliance involving
litigation funders, consumers, academics, community activists, policy makers
and other industry supporters that advocates for responsible regulation and
best practices on the consumer side of the litigation finance industry. In
addition, she served on the Editorial Committee for the forthcoming update to
the Benchbook on International Law published by the American Society of
International Law (ASIL).
Prior to joining the academy, Professor Sahani served for five years as Deputy
Director of Arbitration and ADR in North America for the International Court
of Arbitration of the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC). In this
capacity, Professor Sahani advised government attorneys, inhouse counsel
and law firm attorneys on all phases of arbitration, mediation, and ADR,
including negotiating and drafting dispute resolution clauses, selecting neutrals
and enforcing arbitral awards. She also assisted the United States Council for
International Business (USCIB), which serves as the United States National
Committee to the ICC, in nominating arbitrators, mediators, and experts for
ICC Cases.
Prior to joining the ICC, Professor Sahani served as an associate attorney with
Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP, where she specialized in complex tax
credit and municipal bond financing arrangements for affordable housing and
community development real estate transactions, as well as matters involving
American Indian tribes. In the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina, she traveled to
New Orleans in January 2006 to assist the Washington Lawyers’ Committee
for Civil Rights Fair Housing Project with two housing discrimination claims.
Professor Sahani participated in the inaugural 20032004 class of the Harvard
University Management Fellowship Program, during which time she served as
External Relations Fellow in Harvard’s Office of Government, Community,
and Public Affairs.
Professor Sahani holds a bachelor's degree from Harvard University and a law
degree from Harvard Law School. She is an active member of the bar in New
York and the District of Columbia.
For the Media
Professor Sahani is available to be interviewed on the following subjects:
• Alternative Dispute Resolution
• Arbitration
• Civil Procedure
• International Law
• Litigation Funding
• Mediation
Find subject matter experts.
Faculty
Department Navigation:
Faculty Profiles
Deans & Department Heads
Faculty Scholarship Blog
Law Centers
Publications Archive
Looking for Something?
Search Site Find People
Get Directions Browse Calendar
FǺČŲĿȚỲ
Faculty Search s
Thatcher A. Stone
Ŀěčțųřěř
Ěmǻįŀ
țħǻțčħěř@șțǿňěǻňđẅǿǿđřǿẅŀǻẅ.čǿm
Biography
Courses
Since 1982 Thatcher A. Stone has been practicing at the highest domestic and international levels of finance, banking, assetbased
lending, structured finance, insurance company regulation and licensing and associated credit rating issues. Stone has extensive
experience with export credit agencies and banks in financing, enforcing agreements relating to and repossessing intercontinental
commercial jet aircraft all over the world. In addition, he provides litigation services in the complete aviation arena, including
financing, bankruptcy and passenger claims. In 2013 Thatcher relocated his practice from New York to Virginia. Stone has made
new law, including Stone v. Continental Air Lines, which established nonaccident passenger claims for denied boarding. A
second victory, James H. Hunter v. Lufthansa, Etihad Airways and United Air Lines, in an interim decision dated March 28,
2012, and recently settled in the Eastern District of New York, clarified when the Warsaw and Montreal Conventions do not apply
to airline negligence, despite a tariff provision to the contrary. Finally, in a jury decision dated Dec. 12, 2016, Stone won a verdict
finding KLM Airways guilty of abuse of process, rarely proven in the U.S.
Stone was the founder of Xavian Holdings, Inc., an export credit insurance company. He is rated AV by Martindale Hubbell, the
highest peer review rating a U.S. lawyer can achieve. He also holds a Martindale client distinction award, won by less than 1
percent of lawyers nationally.
Stone has taught aviation law at the School of Law since 2005. He is a member of the Law School’s Executive Committee and
formerly served as the chairman of the National Selection Committee for Jefferson Law Fellows. He is a trustee of the Madison
Lane and Rugby Road Charitable Trust. He serves on two nonprofit boards in the Charlottesville Community, Ash Lawn Opera
and the Fralin Museum.
Stone is admitted in all New York federal and state courts, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second and Ninth Circuits, the U.S.
Supreme Court and other state and federal courts for particular cases around the country. He is an active skier and sailor, and a
retired pilot. He is a 1978 graduate of the College, with distinction, and a 1982 graduate of the Law School. In 2008 he was named
an Alumni Raven at Final Exercises by former University President John Casteen.
ĚĐŲČǺȚİǾŇ
J.D., University of Virginia School of Law, 1982
University of Virginia, 1978

Bǻřbǻřǻ Ǻ. Șpěŀŀmǻň, Șčįěňčě įň Șpįțě ǿf İțșěŀf (Ňǻțųřě)
Sent: Friday, May 19, 2017 11:24 AM
To: intakereb <intakereb@vsb.org>; doris@cvlas.org; McCauley, Jim <mccauley@vsb.org>; Davis, Ned
<Davis@vsb.org>
Cc: NOVAPC <novapc@ic.fbi.gov>; Wilson, Marcus H. (WF) (FBI) <marcus.wilson@ic.fbi.gov>; Mark
Levine <mark@radioinsidescoop.com>; Dave Albo <dave@davealbo.com>; Washington Field FBI Email
<washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>; DelLAdams@house.virginia.gov; DelLAird@house.virginia.gov;
DelDAlbo@house.virginia.gov; DelRAnderson@house.virginia.gov; DelTAustin@house.virginia.gov;
DelLBagby@house.virginia.gov; DelJBell@house.virginia.gov; DelDBell@house.virginia.gov;
DelRBell@house.virginia.gov; DelRBloxom@house.virginia.gov; deljbourne@house.virginia.gov;
DelJBoysko@house.virginia.gov; DelDBulova@house.virginia.gov; DelKByron@house.virginia.gov;
DelJCampbell@house.virginia.gov; DelBCarr@house.virginia.gov; DelBCline@house.virginia.gov;
DelMCole@house.virginia.gov; DelCCollins@house.virginia.gov; DelKCox@house.virginia.gov;
DelGDavis@house.virginia.gov; DelMDudenhefer@house.virginia.gov;
DelJEdmunds@house.virginia.gov; DelMFariss@house.virginia.gov; DelPFarrell@house.virginia.gov;
DelEFiller-Corn@house.virginia.gov; DelBFowler@house.virginia.gov; DelNFreitas@house.virginia.gov;
district27@senate.virginia.gov; district07@senate.virginia.gov; district33@senate.virginia.gov
Subject: * Re: You have a new encrypted message from the Virginia State Bar
Importance: Low
The Internet states clearly that the VSB is an agency of the
Supreme
Court.
It nowhere states since we receive no money from the State do

we get to decide which complaints to follow through and which
ones we can ignore. IE one where someone Helps divorce
lawyer Ilona Grenadier Heckman steal Real Estate. Lawyers
acts and actions that are criminal the public is suppose to
inform your agency weather you accept money from the State
or not.
I am giving as required by the law notice to the lawyers that run

the bar - Mr. Bodey and Mr. McCauley that I am filing
complaints against each of you. This is your opportunity to
work it out, as required by the Bar Rules. A person wishing to
file a complaint should first try and work it out with the
lawyer. If you would like to work it out please let me know.
Warmly,
JW Grenadier
www.JAMJustice.org

1 Corinthians 13:13
On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 5:52 PM, JW Grenadier <jwgrenadier@gmail.com> wrote:

Dear Mr. Brodie and others,
I have included in this e-mail the Virginia Legislature who does

through the Courts of Justice have Over site over the Supreme
Court of Virginia and the JIRC, which since you stated you do
not have to do what any one tells you as you except no money
from the State of Virginia
The Virginia State Bar is a state agency that protects the

public by educating and assisting lawyers to practice ethically
and competently, and by disciplining those who violate the
Supreme Court's Rules of Professional Conduct, all at no cost
to Virginia taxpayers.
I thought it was important that they saw that the Virginia State
Bar did not believe they were required to treat all Lawyers
Equally.
I thought it was important for all elected members to see how
the Virginia State Bar treats the Virginia Citizens and how the
rules do not apply to all members of the bar - just those that
you can bully.
That you have not in over a week gotten back to me with the
law the lawyers are aloud to practice law in Virginia without a
license - I thought it important that the legislature knows this.
It think it is also important for the legislature to know that you,

Mr. Davis and Mr. McCauley have been covering up the
Criminal spree of Divorce Lawyer Ilona Ely Freedman Grenadier
Heckman now for - 9 or more years. WHY because she is one of
the OLD BOYS NETWORK. That Ben Dimurio et al has her back
and she very generously buys tables at parties, makes large
donations with Mr. DiMuro who has made it very public he is
donating 10% of his estate to you.
Again - I ask you - and you can explain to everyone here - where
it states a lawyer not licensed in Virginia can practice law
legally. The other question I have is for you to explain your
statement above - because to me you state very Clearly "We
get to pick and chose who we hold to the Professional Code of
Ethics because the state does not give us money"
I look forward to hearing from you - as I am sure others do.
Thank you
Warmly,
JW Grenadier
\
1 Corinthians 13:13
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 5:20 PM, JW Grenadier <jwgrenadier@gmail.com> wrote:

Mr. Brodie,
This is your response to me for asking where the law is that you
can practice law in Virginia without a Virginia Law license or
being part of the BAR.
The Virginia State Bar is a state agency that protects the public by educating
and assisting lawyers to practice ethically and competently, and by disciplining
those who violate the Supreme Court's Rules of Professional Conduct, all at
no cost to Virginia taxpayers.
I have shared this wisdom with people you have taken there license from - they live
in Fear of the Bar because it does not follow the rules for everyone - only those that
are not part of the Old Boys Network. Those with power and money are treated
differently - as I had put in my complaint the following I will remind you it is ILLEGAL
and against the Professional Rules of conduct to practice law without a license in
Virginia.
According to Google:
The Court has promulgated the definition of the practice of law. See "PRACTICE OFLAW IN THE
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA," infra. The public is best served inlegal matters by lawyers. ...
By statute, any person practicing law without being duly authorized or licensed is guilty of a
misdemeanor.Feb 25, 2010
Search ResultThe Court has promulgated the

definition of the practice of law. See
"PRACTICE OFLAW IN THE COMMONWEALTH
OF VIRGINIA," infra. The public is best served
inlegal matters by lawyers. ... By statute, any
person practicing law without being duly authorized
or licensed is guilty of a misdemeanor.Feb 25, 2010
Unauthorized Practice Rules - Professional ... - Virginia State Bar
www.vsb.org/pro-guidelines/index.php/unauthorized-practice-rules/
Unauthorized Practice of Law - Virginia State Bar
www.vsb.org › Professional Regulation
1.
2.
Apr 28, 2016 - The full text of UPL Opinions can be found at UPL Opinions and can be
searched by a topical index. UPL Opinions are also published in two ...
You've visited this page 2 times. Last visit: 4/4/17
Rule 5.5 - Professional Guidelines and Rules of ... - Virginia State Bar
www.vsb.org/pro-guidelines/index.php/rules/law-firms-and-associations/rule5-5/
1.
2.
(c) A lawyer shall not practice law in a jurisdiction in violation of the ... to practice
law in Virginia;; (ii) the jurisdiction(s) in which the lawyer is licensed to ... is admitted
to practice without limitation in Virginiaor admitted under Part I of Rule 1A:5 ...
You've visited this page 2 times. Last visit: 4/4/17
Practice of Law in the Commonwealth of Virginia - Professional ...
www.vsb.org/pro...php/...practice.../practice-of-law-in-the-commonwealth-of-virginia...
1.
2.
Feb 25, 2010 - (3) One undertakes, with or without compensation, to represent the
interest ... However, any lawyer not licensed to practice law in Virginia, but ...
Unauthorized Practice Rules - Professional ... - Virginia State Bar
www.vsb.org/pro-guidelines/index.php/unauthorized-practice-rules/
1.
2.
Feb 25, 2010 - The Court has promulgated the definition of the practice of law. See
"PRACTICE OF LAWIN THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA," infra. The public is
best served in legal matters by lawyers. ... By statute, any person practicing law
without being duly authorized or licensed is guilty of a misdemeanor.
Penalty for practicing without authority (§ 54.1-3904)—Virginia ...
https://vacode.org/2016/54.1/IV/39/1/54.1-3904/
1.
54.1-3904. Penalty for practicing without authority. Any person who practices law
without being authorized or licensed shall be guilty of a Class 1 misdemeanor.
You visited this page on 4/4/17.
Unlawful to practice without license (§ 54.1-2902)—Virginia Decoded ...
https://vacode.org/2016/54.1/III/29/1/54.1-2902/
1.
Unlawful to practice without license. It shall be unlawful for any person
to practice medicine, osteopathic medicine, chiropractic, podiatry, or as a physician's
or ...
VBBE - Admission Without Exam - Rules & Regulations
barexam.virginia.gov/motion/motionrules.html
1.
2.
Application - An applicant for admission to practice law without examination in this ... or
condition placed on the applicant's license to practice law in that jurisdiction. ... A
member of the Virginia State Bar who is qualified to practice before the ...
§ 54.1-3904. Penalty for practicing without authority - Virginia Law
law.lis.virginia.gov/vacode/title54.1/chapter39/section54.1-3904/
1.
54.1-3904. Penalty for practicing without authority. Any person who practices law
without being authorized or licensed shall be guilty of a Class 1 misdemeanor.
Va. Law License Change Encourages Out-of-State Lawyers | Rosslyn ...
www.rosslynva.org/feature/va-law-license-change-encourages-out-of-state-lawyers
1.
2.
Before this year, lawyers from other states who wanted to join the Virginia State
Bar without taking the state's bar exam had to work at a full-time law practice in ...
Legal Ethics Opinion 1856 - Virginia CLE
www.vacle.org/opinions/1856.htm
1.
2.
Sep 19, 2011 - (c) A lawyer shall not practice law in a jurisdiction in violation of the ....
and without the supervision or association of a Virginia licensed attorney, ...
Mr. Brodie all you have to do is google it to know it is part of the Professional
Code of Ethics. See 10 years ago I was stupid / Nieve and you and Mr.
McCauley, could have me mail things to his house and think you, Ned Davis
and he were good guys. I know better now. I know you three white men
believe you are above the law and could give a SHIT about me. But, you get
a pay check every week to do a job, just like Mr McCauly and Mr. Davis. That
job is not to pick and chose who has to follow the rules and who doesn't.
I am no longer rolling over and allowing the three of you to rape me. and I
would hope that the new President for the first time not to be a white man
would have more respect for the law then the three of you do.
I am in contact and have been for years with those that you choose to punish -
they are aware of the Fraud - yes the public does not pay for your services -
but, that does not mean you get to run a criminal enterprise.
Now please give me the law that states a lawyer has the right to practice law
in Virginia without a license or do your job and hold this guy accountable so
he doesn't do it to someone else.
I look forward to hearing back from you.
Warmly,
Search Resul
JW Grenadier
www.JAMJustice.org

1 Corinthians 13:13
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 4:35 PM, <intakereb@vsb.org> wrote:

You have received an encrypted message from the Virginia State Bar. The sender intended for the
message contents to be secured using a secure email encryption service. You can retrieve the message
from the Barracuda Networks Message Center.
To view your secure message, click here, or copy and paste the following URL into your browser:
https://encrypt.barracudanetworks.com/login?nid=U2FsdGVkX19i3QMdhVRWADsgguy7FQpq38%2FUA
mtX5LqawgLWN79thCcErRr8SgBxGzGa8%2BXwhHZwh2c80idpUDRdilQ3m71Vw%2B3hVeFcIE4nXj69Q9
HZBcdzvSB2RLNEWj7LMGGtzjPCySpavd3CawjYQDnQyRtboVvA49ClWos2cxO9x%2BtxBUFVrWybMtrB2rX
CcFOtqESTXllFzHNvdZfnjXdFI5cJHXS88M%2F086M%3D
The secure message will expire in 30 days.

Sent: Friday, July 14, 2017 1:41 PM
To: doris@cvlas.org; Davis, Ned <Davis@vsb.org>; jim clark <james.clark@alexandriava.gov>; James
Banks <James.Banks@alexandriava.gov>; Whistleblower (Judiciary-Rep) <whistleblower@judiciary-
rep.senate.gov>; Wilson, Marcus H. (WF) (FBI) <marcus.wilson@ic.fbi.gov>; Washington Field FBI Email
<washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>; NOVAPC <novapc@ic.fbi.gov>; Doug Robelen <drobelen@vacourts.gov>;
McCauley, Jim <mccauley@vsb.org>; Simon, Noah <Noah.Simon@mail.house.gov>;
mherring@oag.state.va.us; Serrano, Margeaux S. <mserrano@oag.state.va.us>
Cc: Mark Levine <mark@radioinsidescoop.com>; Dave Albo <dave@davealbo.com>;
<intakereb@vsb.org>; Brian.Moran@governor.va.gov; bryan.porter@alexandriava.gov; Allison
Silberberg <allison.silberberg@alexandriava.gov>; jkloch@juridicalsolutions.com;
asimpson@juridicalsolutions.com; jmcgrath@juridicalsolutions.com; lisa.kemler@alexandriava.com;
info@juridicalsolutions.com
Subject: * Re: Janice Wolk Grenadier
Importance: Low
Dear Ms Doris H. Causey,
On or around December 2, 2016 I field a VSB complaint against

several lawyers who have worked in collusion to cover up the
criminal acts and actions of Divorce Lawyer Ilona Ely Freedman
Grenadier Heckman and her law firm. I have attached the
documents you should take a serious look at - as well as the FBI
et al as these are the documents that the Scheme and was used
to steal money and Real Estate through her law firm. That
Iloana being a VERY RICH JEWISH lawyer is rumored now to be
sleeping with the Federal Judges to ensure an outcome in her
favor for her "GANG" members which include several Judges
and Lawyers.
Your Oath of Office demands you investigate and the VSB may
not take direct funds from the Virginia Legislature the
appearance is they are regulated through the Supreme Court
which has an obligation as you do to report any and all criminal
activity by a lawyer or Judge to the appropriate authorities
which include and not limited to the Virginia State Legislatures
cc'd in this e-mail.
The two documents the Forged Trust agreement and a

liquidation agreement done by a lawyer not licensed in Virginia,
who has admitted he did it for Ilona, along with the supporting
documents show this to be deliberate with knowledgeable
intent to convert illegally real estate by a lawyer for personal
financial gain through her law firm. That the VSB has been
involved and actively helped cover this up should be a real
concern to you and every lawyer or legislature in Virginia.
That the Governor Terry McAuliffe - Lt Gov Ralph Northam and

Attorney General Mark Herring have also actively covered it
up.
The Very POWERFUL lawyers and law firms include Troutman

Sanders aka Mays and Valentine, BWW Law Group, Equity
Trusties, DimuroGinsberg, Reed Smith Ilona Grenadier – Grenadier.
Anderson, Starace, Duffett & Kieser
Ben DiMuro - DiMuroGinsberg
Hillary J. Collyer - DiMuro Ginsberg / Lasher et al
Judge John Tran - DiMuro Ginsberg / Fairfax C
ity Judge for his collusion in hiring Mark Stuart
Andrea Molsley - DiMruoGinsberg
Michael Weiser Esq
Reed Smith -
KellerHeckman
Fagelson Law Firm
Kermit Rosenberg
Robert Mayer
Roy Zimmerman
Stonewall Title
Heba Carter
I understand and need to know if I am wrong that the Bar

recommends and uses the Insurance Co. Alps and only Alps by
the appearance of your website. So in return, the collusion to
ignore the criminal activity ensures fewer payouts by Alps and
more "Kick Back" to the Bar? This is I believe Insurance Fraud?
Further, the Appearance is that there is a belief that ignoring

me with the help of many - you can "KILL ME"
The Virginia Constitution, the United States Constitution has
been made a mockery out of all of you. I would appreciate and
update on my complaint.
I have kept today's attachments to the most incriminating and

the documents that were used to steal Real Estate and Money:
The Liquidation agreement and one of the Deeds signed by

Iloan acknowledging it.
The documents showing the tampering with the Grand Jury by
Judge Potter and Commonwealth Attorney Randy Sengel
The Document that shows the Forged Trust addendum that this
by all appearance started with and has been used to steal
through today, also two letters one that made Ilona the most
nervous of being exposed to the car dealership as it is on her
stationary showing the Scheme was run out of her law firm
along with all the lawyers in her firm today and past being
aware of and colluding to Cover Up.
Warmly,
JW Grenadier
www.JAMJustice.org
1 Corinthians 13:13
On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 11:16 AM, JW Grenadier <jwgrenadier@gmail.com> wrote:

I have included you in E-mails with the VSB. I would like the
opportunity to meet with you or at least talk to you on the
phone. I field complaints against / about Divorce Lawyer Ilona
Grenadier Heckman years ago. My complaints were covered up
and since then she feels she and her GANG of lawyers and
Judges all party to the Old Boys Network that they are above
the law in Virginia. To be honest, they should feel that way as
in Northern Virginia I can show the Judges, the police, the FBI
with the help of our Governor allow the courts to be run as the
mafia.
I have all along by Judges and others in power I am a nobody - I

am no longer one of the Old Boys Network, and I can not get
justice and fairness in the court. I have believe in the Bible and
in God. I have a David and Goliath story. I believe if I don't
stand up and speak out it will only continue to happen and it
will only get worse. I am not alone and can give you names of
others that are victims and have instead of speaking out paid
the price and have committed suicide or are living like a dead
person, as I am. When they illegally jailed me and had me
tortured - the goal was I would commit suicide -since there
Murder for hire did not work.
I know you are very busy but, I would ask you review the
following testimony in front of the Virginia State Legislature
Courts of Justice - all lawyers ignoring the rule of the VSB if you
know of criminal activity of another lawyer your responsibility
to report it. Instead this crowd supports the criminal activity of
Judges - as they practice in front of them. Virginia through the
ACLU is known as the worst state for any type of Justice or over
site. Reading about you - I pray someone is in a place of power
to make a change and not just look the other way as your
predecessors have done.
Find attached an outline mostly about me - But, also goes into how active
Murder for Hire is. It shows the stepping down of Cynthia Kinser for letting
Michael Gardner out of jail et al.
Fighting B.A.C.K. with Host Sandra Grazzini-Rucki

http://www.blogtalkradio.com/futureofourchildren/2017/03/03/fighting-back-
with-host-sandra-grazzini-rucki
1. An Article about Nancy Dunning and the fact that the guy in the
video in target a subject of interest.
2. Find in the conversation that is that gentlemen and the evidence is
with his sister and much other information He also talks about
other suspects that he was aware of. He is a friend of
Severance’s. He talks about the lawyers throwing the case - which
I sat two days and saw the same thing happen. I also was in the
courtroom when Commonwealth Attorney Bryan Porter who stated
to me “Do not talk to the City of Alexandria Police only talk to the
FBI” neither has ever talked to me. Just the opposite they have
tried to marginalize me and state that I am crazy as everyone
else. But, the evidence shows differently.
3. Copy of a few pages of the book - Bullied to Death. I do not believe
it is a coincidence that Pete Scamado was a President and on the
board of two Professional Development / Real Estate Association’s
here in Alexandria on King Street - less than a mile from my home.
4. Nor do I think it was a coincidence that he use Jim Cotterll as his
daughters attorney - he took over Marty Gannon’s office who
worked hand in hand with my x-mother in law Ilona Grenadier
Heckman as divorce attorneys. He met with me once and had me
taped and then he had a rate I could not afford. He also wanted to
make it crazy and now I see - I would have lost my children and I
most likely would be dead today.
5. Is it a coincidence that Gov Terry McAuliffe lied about the $120,000
donation and know the Chinese gentleman that made the donation
and he introduced to the Clintons or that he gave $650 thousand
dollars to the wife of the FBI agent who over saw the Clinton e-
mails? Or that over $1.3 million went into McAuliffe’s fund raising
from Clinton donors?
6. That James Comey was celebrated by the University of Richmond
Law School with being the Commencement Speaker or other
special awards recently. The same school the head of the Old
Boys Network Judge Donald Kent was President and sits on the
board. That Judge Donald Kent controls the JIRC.
7. From what I know the Seth Rich murder, even though he was not in
his home, he was on his way home and close to his home. Beeing
Shot the way he was makes his murder similar to the other five
murders where people open their front door that were shot to
death. That the appearance is he was the leaker to
WikiLeaks. That the hierarchy of the state of Virginia is on the
Hillary Clinton team.
Just some thoughts
The coincidences - go on and on and on.
Please find attached the information we talked about. To read more you
can also go to www.VALaw2010.blogspot.com or
www.ProseAmerica.blogspot.com I spoke in front of the City Council and
you will find other videos at
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jKJM8g-H8mA How safe is Trump Family FBI involved in

COVER UP Murder for Hire in Virginia?
October 31, 2015 Janice Wolk Grenadier - Murder for Hire

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Eocg-MFj_Qs
Other links in front of the Virginia Legislature
These are not all the links - I can supply you with more. I spoke twice in
the morning prior to going to over to the Supreme Court to find an
“ORDER” issued denying my Emergency Motion to “Stay” all of Judge
Clarks orders. Justice Lemons Retaliation and Retribution was swift.
Judge Johnston - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vmtaDPQ_w2A
Judge Parker for Sally Minetree - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GvSeBt-3WxU
Greg Harrington as you will see in this link - the retaliation and
disingenuous statements by Judge Parker.
Judge Parker abused his power and it was clear. Giving the Judge's the
last word is a practise to protect the lawyers on the panel to win in his court
room.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NapE1NFROYk&t=13s
This is the Link for June 22 2016 hearing in the City of Alexandria - Where you hear Judge
James Clark state that he is on the side of the Defendants further state that he never made a
cent off of his being a Trustee for every loan Burke & Herbert did and he was Trustee for each
one. It was a shame hearing by a Judge who will go to any length to Cover Up the criminal
spree of Divorce Lawyer Ilona Grenadier Heckman.
https://youtu.be/Lo5U4FrvdwI
We all must support Trump as he is supporting us in the Corruption of the Courts - Consider
Intervene or a Declaration more will be coming out in the next few days through ProSe America how
to support President Donald J. Trump and his EO in keeping Americans safe.
http://www.therevolutionaryconservative.com/articles/civil-rights/2017-02-18-pro-trump-advocates-
intervene-ACLU-lawsuit.html
JW Grenadier
www.JAMJustice.org
1 Corinthians 13:13
Sent: Friday, July 14, 2017 3:32 PM
To: John Ries <jries@alpsnet.com>; claims@alpsnet.com; customerservice@alpsnet.com;
rtameler@alpsnet.com; doris@cvlas.org
Cc: Davis, Ned <Davis@vsb.org>; jim clark <james.clark@alexandriava.gov>; James Banks
<James.Banks@alexandriava.gov>; Whistleblower (Judiciary-Rep) <whistleblower@judiciary-
<washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>; NOVAPC <novapc@ic.fbi.gov>; Doug Robelen <drobelen@vacourts.gov>;
McCauley, Jim <mccauley@vsb.org>; Simon, Noah <Noah.Simon@mail.house.gov>;
mherring@oag.state.va.us; Serrano, Margeaux S. <mserrano@oag.state.va.us>; Cc: Mark Levine
<mark@radioinsidescoop.com>; Dave Albo <dave@davealbo.com>; DelLAdams@house.virginia.gov;
DelLAird@house.virginia.gov; DelDAlbo@house.virginia.gov; DelRAnderson@house.virginia.gov;
DelTAustin@house.virginia.gov; DelLBagby@house.virginia.gov; DelJBell@house.virginia.gov;
DelDBell@house.virginia.gov; DelRBell@house.virginia.gov; DelRBloxom@house.virginia.gov;
deljbourne@house.virginia.gov; DelJBoysko@house.virginia.gov; DelDBulova@house.virginia.gov;
DelKByron@house.virginia.gov; DelJCampbell@house.virginia.gov; DelBCarr@house.virginia.gov;
DelBCline@house.virginia.gov; DelMCole@house.virginia.gov; DelCCollins@house.virginia.gov;
DelKCox@house.virginia.gov; DelGDavis@house.virginia.gov; DelMDudenhefer@house.virginia.gov;
info@juridicalsolutions.com; Noah Bookbinder <info@citizensforethics.org>
Subject: * Fwd: Janice Wolk Grenadier
Importance: Low
Dear Mr. Ries,
I have reviewed your past e-mails of supporting the criminal

actions of Divorce Lawyer Ilona Grenadier Heckman and many
other lawyers - I understand with a bit of an investigation
where you feel empowered to ignore the criminal acts and
actions of many lawyers against me. I am looking at filing a
state and federal complaint against Alps insurance or a law suit
only against Alps as due to the insurance by the lawyers listed
below and the ones that have been reported to you in the
past.
There appears to be collusion with Alps Insurance and the

Virginia State Bar. The VSB has agreed by all appearance to
only advertise you on there site, agree to not find lawyers
guilty and agree to all different types of donations in classes et
al from alps insurance.
JW Grenadier
www.JAMJustice.org
1 Corinthians 13:13
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 1:44 PM
Subject: Fwd: Janice Wolk Grenadier
To: jennifer@markobenshain.com
Please Review and I would appreciate Mark getting back to me.
Thank you,
Warmly,
JW Grenadier
www.JAMJustice.org
1 Corinthians 13:13

Date: Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 1:41 PM
Subject: Re: Janice Wolk Grenadier
To: doris@cvlas.org, "Davis, Ned" <davis@vsb.org>, jim clark <james.clark@alexandriava.gov>, James
Banks <James.Banks@alexandriava.gov>, "Whistleblower (Judiciary-Rep)" <whistleblower@judiciary-
rep.senate.gov>, "Wilson, Marcus H. (WF) (FBI)" <marcus.wilson@ic.fbi.gov>, Washington Field FBI
Email <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, NOVAPC <novapc@ic.fbi.gov>, Doug Robelen
<drobelen@vacourts.gov>, "McCauley, Jim" <mccauley@vsb.org>, "Simon, Noah"
<Noah.Simon@mail.house.gov>

On or around December 2, 2016 I field a VSB complaint against
several lawyers who have worked in collusion to cover up the
criminal acts and actions of Divorce Lawyer Ilona Ely Freedman
Grenadier Heckman and her law firm. I have attached the
documents you should take a serious look at - as well as the FBI
et al as these are the documents that the Scheme and was used
to steal money and Real Estate through her law firm. That
Iloana being a VERY RICH JEWISH lawyer is rumored now to be
sleeping with the Federal Judges to ensure an outcome in her
favor for her "GANG" members which include several Judges
and Lawyers.
Your Oath of Office demands you investigate and the VSB may
not take direct funds from the Virginia Legislature the
appearance is they are regulated through the Supreme Court
which has an obligation as you do to report any and all criminal
activity by a lawyer or Judge to the appropriate authorities
which include and not limited to the Virginia State Legislatures
cc'd in this e-mail.
The two documents the Forged Trust agreement and a

liquidation agreement done by a lawyer not licensed in Virginia,
who has admitted he did it for Ilona, along with the supporting
documents show this to be deliberate with knowledgeable
intent to convert illegally real estate by a lawyer for personal
financial gain through her law firm. That the VSB has been
involved and actively helped cover this up should be a real
concern to you and every lawyer or legislature in Virginia.
That the Governor Terry McAuliffe - Lt Gov Ralph Northam and
Attorney General Mark Herring have also actively covered it
up.
The Very POWERFUL lawyers and law firms include Troutman

Sanders aka Mays and Valentine, BWW Law Group, Equity
Trusties, DimuroGinsberg, Reed Smith Ilona Grenadier – Grenadier.
Anderson, Starace, Duffett & Kieser
Ben DiMuro - DiMuroGinsberg
Hillary J. Collyer - DiMuro Ginsberg / Lasher et al
Judge John Tran - DiMuro Ginsberg /
Fairfax City Judge for his collusion in hiring Mark Stuart
Andrea Molsley - DiMruoGinsberg

Michael Weiser Esq
Reed Smith -
KellerHeckman
Fagelson Law Firm
Kermit Rosenberg
Robert Mayer
Roy Zimmerman
Stonewall Title
Heba Carter
I understand and need to know if I am wrong that the Bar

recommends and uses the Insurance Co. Alps and only Alps by
the appearance of your website. So in return, the collusion to
ignore the criminal activity ensures fewer payouts by Alps and
more "Kick Back" to the Bar? This is I believe Insurance Fraud?
Further, the Appearance is that there is a belief that ignoring
me with the help of many - you can "KILL ME"
The Virginia Constitution, the United States Constitution has
been made a mockery out of all of you. I would appreciate and
update on my complaint.
I have kept today's attachments to the most incriminating and

the documents that were used to steal Real Estate and Money:
The Liquidation agreement and one of the Deeds signed by

Iloan acknowledging it.
The documents showing the tampering with the Grand Jury by
Judge Potter and Commonwealth Attorney Randy Sengel
The Document that shows the Forged Trust addendum that this
by all appearance started with and has been used to steal
through today, also two letters one that made Ilona the most
nervous of being exposed to the car dealership as it is on her
stationary showing the Scheme was run out of her law firm
along with all the lawyers in her firm today and past being
aware of and colluding to Cover Up.
Warmly,
JW Grenadier
www.JAMJustice.org
1 Corinthians 13:13
On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 11:16 AM, JW Grenadier <jwgrenadier@gmail.com> wrote:

I have included you in E-mails with the VSB. I would like the
opportunity to meet with you or at least talk to you on the
phone. I field complaints against / about Divorce Lawyer Ilona
Grenadier Heckman years ago. My complaints were covered up
and since then she feels she and her GANG of lawyers and
Judges all party to the Old Boys Network that they are above
the law in Virginia. To be honest, they should feel that way as
in Northern Virginia I can show the Judges, the police, the FBI
with the help of our Governor allow the courts to be run as the
mafia.
I have all along by Judges and others in power I am a nobody - I

am no longer one of the Old Boys Network, and I can not get
justice and fairness in the court. I have believe in the Bible and
in God. I have a David and Goliath story. I believe if I don't
stand up and speak out it will only continue to happen and it
will only get worse. I am not alone and can give you names of
others that are victims and have instead of speaking out paid
the price and have committed suicide or are living like a dead
person, as I am. When they illegally jailed me and had me
tortured - the goal was I would commit suicide -since there
Murder for hire did not work.
I know you are very busy but, I would ask you review the
following testimony in front of the Virginia State Legislature
Courts of Justice - all lawyers ignoring the rule of the VSB if you
know of criminal activity of another lawyer your responsibility
to report it. Instead this crowd supports the criminal activity of
Judges - as they practice in front of them. Virginia through the
ACLU is known as the worst state for any type of Justice or over
site. Reading about you - I pray someone is in a place of power
to make a change and not just look the other way as your
predecessors have done.
Find attached an outline mostly about me - But, also goes into how active
Murder for Hire is. It shows the stepping down of Cynthia Kinser for letting
Michael Gardner out of jail et al.

http://www.blogtalkradio.com/futureofourchildren/2017/03/03/fighting-back-
with-host-sandra-grazzini-rucki
1. An Article about Nancy Dunning and the fact that the guy in the
video in target a subject of interest.
2. Find in the conversation that is that gentlemen and the evidence is
with his sister and much other information He also talks about
other suspects that he was aware of. He is a friend of
Severance’s. He talks about the lawyers throwing the case - which
I sat two days and saw the same thing happen. I also was in the
courtroom when Commonwealth Attorney Bryan Porter who stated
to me “Do not talk to the City of Alexandria Police only talk to the
FBI” neither has ever talked to me. Just the opposite they have
tried to marginalize me and state that I am crazy as everyone
else. But, the evidence shows differently.
3. Copy of a few pages of the book - Bullied to Death. I do not believe
it is a coincidence that Pete Scamado was a President and on the
board of two Professional Development / Real Estate Association’s
here in Alexandria on King Street - less than a mile from my home.
4. Nor do I think it was a coincidence that he use Jim Cotterll as his
daughters attorney - he took over Marty Gannon’s office who
worked hand in hand with my x-mother in law Ilona Grenadier
Heckman as divorce attorneys. He met with me once and had me
taped and then he had a rate I could not afford. He also wanted to
make it crazy and now I see - I would have lost my children and I
most likely would be dead today.
5. Is it a coincidence that Gov Terry McAuliffe lied about the $120,000
donation and know the Chinese gentleman that made the donation
and he introduced to the Clintons or that he gave $650 thousand
dollars to the wife of the FBI agent who over saw the Clinton e-
mails? Or that over $1.3 million went into McAuliffe’s fund raising
from Clinton donors?
6. That James Comey was celebrated by the University of Richmond
Law School with being the Commencement Speaker or other
special awards recently. The same school the head of the Old
Boys Network Judge Donald Kent was President and sits on the
board. That Judge Donald Kent controls the JIRC.
7. From what I know the Seth Rich murder, even though he was not in
his home, he was on his way home and close to his home. Beeing
Shot the way he was makes his murder similar to the other five
murders where people open their front door that were shot to
death. That the appearance is he was the leaker to
WikiLeaks. That the hierarchy of the state of Virginia is on the
Hillary Clinton team.
Just some thoughts
The coincidences - go on and on and on.
Please find attached the information we talked about. To read more you
can also go to www.VALaw2010.blogspot.com or
www.ProseAmerica.blogspot.com I spoke in front of the City Council and
you will find other videos at
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jKJM8g-H8mA How safe is Trump Family FBI involved in
COVER UP Murder for Hire in Virginia?
October 31, 2015 Janice Wolk Grenadier - Murder for Hire

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Eocg-MFj_Qs
Other links in front of the Virginia Legislature
These are not all the links - I can supply you with more. I spoke twice in
the morning prior to going to over to the Supreme Court to find an
“ORDER” issued denying my Emergency Motion to “Stay” all of Judge
Clarks orders. Justice Lemons Retaliation and Retribution was swift.
disingenuous statements by Judge Parker.
Judge Parker abused his power and it was clear. Giving the Judge's the
last word is a practise to protect the lawyers on the panel to win in his court
room.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NapE1NFROYk&t=13s
This is the Link for June 22 2016 hearing in the City of Alexandria - Where you hear Judge
James Clark state that he is on the side of the Defendants further state that he never made a
cent off of his being a Trustee for every loan Burke & Herbert did and he was Trustee for each
one. It was a shame hearing by a Judge who will go to any length to Cover Up the criminal
spree of Divorce Lawyer Ilona Grenadier Heckman.
https://youtu.be/Lo5U4FrvdwI
We all must support Trump as he is supporting us in the Corruption of the Courts - Consider
Intervene or a Declaration more will be coming out in the next few days through ProSe America how
to support President Donald J. Trump and his EO in keeping Americans safe.
http://www.therevolutionaryconservative.com/articles/civil-rights/2017-02-18-pro-trump-advocates-
intervene-ACLU-lawsuit.html
JW Grenadier
www.JAMJustice.org
1 Corinthians 13:13
7/14/2017 Virginia State Bar -
SEARCH RESULTS
About 49 results (0.24 seconds)
Virginia State Bar - Events - ALPS Bar Leaders Retreat

ALPS Bar Leaders Retreat. Wed, July 12, 2017 - Sun, July 16, 2017. Missoula, Montana.
Updated: Jan 21, 2016 ...
www.vsb.org/site/events/item/alps_bar_leaders_retreat
Virginia State Bar - An Agency of the Supreme Court of Virginia

7/12/2017 - 7/16/2017: ALPS Bar Leaders Retreat; 7/13/2017: VSB
Professionalism Course; 7/14/2017: Standing Committee on Legal Ethics; 7/17/
2017: VSB ...
www.vsb.org/
Lawyer Malpractice Insurance

ALPS Property & Casualty Insurance Company is the VSB's endorsed professional liability
insurance carrier. .... February 16, 2017 VSB office, Richmond.
www.vsb.org/site/about/lawyer_malpractice_insurance_report_2016
Virginia State Bar | Conference of Local Bar Associations

5/25/2017 | Charlottesville-Albemarle Bar Named Bar Association of the Year ... 5
/19/2017 | Andrew J. Reinhardt to Receive First Specialty Bar Leader of the ...
www.vsb.org/site/conferences/clba/
Virginia State Bar | Pro Bono/Access

Virginia Legal Aid & Oliver Hill Pro Bono Awards Luncheon. June 16, 2017 ... Sponsor: ALPS.
© 1996 - 2017 Virginia State Bar | Privacy Policy 1111 East Main ...
www.vsb.org/site/pro_bono/pro_bono.../awards_luncheon_2017
Virginia State Bar - Events

The 2017 VSB TECHSHOW will feature CLE, Virginia Supreme Court Justice
Cleo E. Powell and a national panel of ABA TECHSHOW® speakers. Agenda:.
www.vsb.org/site/events/item/vsb_lawyer_insurance_committee1
Virginia State Bar - Events

July 2017. 07/12 - 07/16: ALPS Bar Leaders Retreat; 07/12: Access to Legal ... 10 /12 -
10/14: Local Government Attorneys of Virginia Fall 2017 Conference ...
www.vsb.org/site/events
Winter 2017.pub
File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat
The 2017 CLBA Bar Leader's Institute will be held March 10 at the Lewis Ginter Botanical
Garden in ..... ALPS—contact Amy Esp at aesp@alpsnet.com or.
www.vsb.org/docs/conferences/clba/Winter_2017.pdf
Risk Management
VIRGINIA LAWYER | April 2017 | Vol. 65. 48. Risk Management. Theft of .... Mark
Bassingthwaight, ALPS risk manager, has conducted more than 1,000 law firm ...
http://www.vsb.org/site/search/results?cx=004114476644798646042%3Adzmpoo_umj4&cof=FORID%3A10&ie=UTF-8&q=alps+2017&sa=Search 1/2
Bassingthwaight, ALPS risk manager, has conducted more than 1,000 law firm ...
www.vsb.org/docs/valawyermagazine/vl0417-risk.pdf
Virginia Lawyer
65 | February 2017 | VIRGINIA LAWYER. 53 www.vsb.org. Classified Ads. Positions
Available. PI JUNIOR ASSOCIATE ATTORNEY. (JACKSONVILLE, FL).
www.vsb.org/docs/valawyermagazine/vl0217-classifieds.pdf
1 2 3 4 5
powered by Custom Search
http://www.vsb.org/site/search/results?cx=004114476644798646042%3Adzmpoo_umj4&cof=FORID%3A10&ie=UTF-8&q=alps+2017&sa=Search 2/2
SEARCH RESULTS
About 440 results (0.31 seconds)
Virginia State Bar - News - Bar Endorsement of ALPS Reaffirmed

Mar 18, 2014 ... Bickmore, an insurance and risk management consulting firm, has completed
its review of the VSB's endorsement relationship with ALPS.
https://www.vsb.org/site/news/item/alps-reaffirmed-2014
Virginia State Bar - Events - ALPS Bar Leaders Retreat

ALPS Bar Leaders Retreat. Wed, July 12, 2017 - Sun, July 16, 2017. Missoula, Montana.
Updated: Jan 21, 2016 ...
www.vsb.org/site/events/item/alps_bar_leaders_retreat
Virginia State Bar - News - ALPS Announces Southern Title Problems

Sep 20, 2011 ... The VSB's endorsed professional liability carrier, ALPS (Attorneys Liability
Protection Society), has announced that Southern Title, the title ...
www.vsb.org/site/news/item/alps-announces-southern-title-problems
report's
Mar 13, 2014 ... Meetings in Missoula, Montana with Senior Managers of ALPS Property &
Casualty. Insurance Company, the insurer that has underwritten the ...
www.vsb.org/docs/VSB-report-031314.pdf
Lawyer Malpractice Insurance

ALPS Property & Casualty Insurance Company is the VSB's endorsed professional liability
insurance carrier. The Special Committee on Lawyer Malpractice ...
www.vsb.org/site/about/lawyer_malpractice_insurance_report_2016
PRE-RE GIS T RA TION FOR ALPS VSB FALL 2006 CLE TOUR
PRE-RE GIS T RA TION FOR ALPS VSB FALL 2006 CLE TOUR. ALPS in conjunction with
the Virginia State Bar is pleased to announce the dates of their.
www.vsb.org/docs/alps-cle-fall06.pdf
Virginia State Bar - News - Wendy F. Inge Named ALPS Risk ...
Jun 2, 2011 ... Attorneys Liability Protection Society (ALPS) has named Virginia attorney
Wendy F. Inge as ALPS risk manager for Virginia. Inge will educate ...
www.vsb.org/site/news/item/inge-alps-risk-manager
Special Committee on Lawyer Malpractice Insurance

Jul 13, 2015 ... ALPS RRG (Attorneys Liability Protection Society Inc., A Risk Retention
Group) is the VSB's endorsed professional liability insurance carrier.
www.vsb.org/site/about/lawyer_malpractice_insurance_2015
VA Lawyer
ALPS, the endorsed malpractice insurance carrier for the. Virginia State Bar, takes a deep
interest and active involvement in the evolution of the practice and ...
http://www.vsb.org/site/search/results?cx=004114476644798646042%3Adzmpoo_umj4&cof=FORID%3A10&ie=UTF-8&q=alps&sa=Search 1/2
interest and active involvement in the evolution of the practice and ...
www.vsb.org/docs/valawyermagazine/dec05alps.pdf
Trust Management
The Virginia State Bar's Lawyers Malpractice. Insurance Committee (LMIC) has partnered
with Attorneys Liability Protection Society. (ALPS), the bar's endorsed ...
www.vsb.org/docs/valawyermagazine/vl0707_trust.pdf
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
powered by Custom Search
http://www.vsb.org/site/search/results?cx=004114476644798646042%3Adzmpoo_umj4&cof=FORID%3A10&ie=UTF-8&q=alps&sa=Search 2/2
7/14/2017 Virginia State Bar - Member Resources - Risk Management
MEMBER RESOURCES
Risk Management
Virginia Claims Prevention Hotline

Powered by ALPS
For new and seasoned Virginia lawyers with concerns or questions about the day-to-
day practice of law.
John J. Brandt, Esquire

Note new phone number effective 1/1/17: (703) 659-6567
Do you have questions related to risk management within your practice?
Did you know that the Virginia State Bar provides a free and confidential risk
management hotline as one of its benefits to members?
The Malpractice Prevention Hotline is operated by John J. Brandt, a Virginia trial

attorney with 50 years in the profession.
John J. Brandt operates a confidential telephone hotline

attorney consultation service for all members of the VSB, free
of charge. He is a Virginia trial lawyer with over 50 years
experience.
Mr. Brandt is with Nolan & Mroz, PLC in Dunn Loring (Fairfax
County) VA. Mr. Brandt represents personal injury clients and
mediates/arbitrates personal injury and professional liability
disputes. He has been in law practice in Virginia since 1963
and holds both a JD (1961) and an LL.M. (1962) from the
Georgetown University Law School.
He is a Fellow of the renowned American College of Trial Lawyers and has lectured
extensively at continuing legal education seminars.
Mr. Brandt will answer your questions which may minimize the risk of your being sued
for malpractice or receiving a bar complaint. There are no limits to the topics you can
discuss with him, including:
Starting a law practice

Obtaining legal malpractice insurance
Fee arrangements
http://www.vsb.org/site/members/your-risk-manager 1/2
7/14/2017 Virginia State Bar - Member Resources - Risk Management
Types of ownership entities, i.e., sole proprietorship and limited liability

co.
Sharing office space
Leaving law practice (and either joining another firm or retiring)
Substantive/procedural legal questions dealing with transactional, trial
and appellate issues.
Dealing with a difficult client
Withdrawing from representation
Fee disputes
For more information, visit Mr. Brandt's helpful hints in law practice
If you have a legal ethics question, please email the VSB Ethics Hotline.
Updated: Jan 05, 2017
http://www.vsb.org/site/members/your-risk-manager 2/2
A GUIDE TO PURCHASING LAWYER’S PROFESSIONAL
LIABILITY INSURANCE IN VIRGINIA
Presented By
The Virginia State Bar's

Special Committee on Lawyer Malpractice Insurance
May 2008
Error! Unknown document property name.

The Need For Professional Liability Insurance
Malpractice insurance is essential to:
• Reduce the chance that a claim will result in a severe financial hardship.
• Provide the insured attorney with objective advice when faced with a
malpractice claim.
• Assure a prompt and reasonable settlement or dismissal of a claim.
• Provide access to valuable risk management resources.
• Save time and reduce the frustration of dealing with spurious claims.
• Provide protection for an attorney’s reputation and
• Ultimately, protect the client’s interests in the face of a credible claim.
Although the debate over mandatory insurance continues, as of today attorneys in Virginia are not
required to maintain malpractice coverage. However, many of the Commonwealth's citizens assume
to their detriment that they will have access to compensation in the event a mistake is made. To our
credit as a profession, most Virginia lawyers in private practice recognize malpractice litigation as an
ever present risk for today's professional.
To help our members meet that threat head on, the Virginia State Bar supports the work of its
Special Committee on Lawyer Malpractice Insurance and endorses and works closely with one
malpractice insurance carrier: the Attorneys Liability Protection Society ("ALPS"). ALPS provided
this committee with concrete data to help understand the risks and the solutions available in today’s
market place.
For example, about 4% of lawyers insured by ALPS submitted potential malpractice claims in 2007.
ALPS’ clients represent a cross-section of the attorneys in Virginia, so we can conclude that a firm of
20 lawyers will likely have a malpractice claim every year of its existence. In spite of this substantial
and growing risk of claims, the Bar's records indicate that as of 2007 approximately 2,000 of its
members who represent clients drawn from the general public (almost 12%) are practicing without
any malpractice coverage. We respectfully submit that this lack of preventative action is
unacceptable.
The Special Committee on Lawyer Malpractice Insurance has created this guide as a resource to
assist a lawyer in making an informed decision when purchasing professional liability coverage.
The Parties
The insured is you, the attorney or law firm purchasing legal malpractice coverage. The named
insured is also sometimes referred
to as “the policy holder”. The Policy Pointer: Coverage is generally only valid for work
insurance company or "carrier" is done on behalf of the “named insured.” If you do or did
the primary company that provides work on behalf of other firms or outside agencies, it is likely
the policy form, terms, conditions, that this work will not be covered under your standard
and limits. The carrier handles your policy. Be sure to disclose any prior outside work to your
claim in conjunction with the local insurance provider and discuss what coverage options are
1
defense attorney assigned to your claim. It is the source of your insurance product and provides
coverage for claims against you. In some cases the carrier will be a direct writer and in other
instances the carrier will be represented by a broker. A direct writer markets and sells its products
through employees of the carrier or agents who have substantial expertise in the specific company’s
policy. A broker works as an intermediary between multiple carriers and the lawyer requesting
insurance.
Both direct writer agents and intermediary brokers will assist you in obtaining the proper coverage,
answer questions about coverage and detail the limits of liability that fit your practice profile. They
will also discuss current claim trends and assist with legal malpractice prevention programs. You
should work with direct writer agents or brokers with specific expertise in lawyers’ professional
liability insurance within the Virginia market.
The Paperwork
There are four basic documents you need to know about: the Application, the Declarations Page,
the Certificate of Insurance, and the Policy.
In the Application you provide the

carrier with information regarding Policy Pointer: Some companies use the term Maturing
yourself, your firm and your Attorney to refer to lawyers whose loss inclusion date is
practice. The carrier then takes relatively recent. As an attorney builds up a longer client
that information and determines history, the window of exposure opens wider, and
what type of risk you present, in consequently the premium for that individual attorney will
what is called the underwriting increase. Because of this rating procedure you should be
process. The most important aware that premiums in the first year of the policy tend to
factors in the underwriting and be lower but increase steadily for the length of the
premium setting process are: claims history, firm size, jurisdiction, loss inclusion date and areas of
practice. To obtain an accurate quote, it is essential that you report this information fully.
For most purchasers, completing the application is the most difficult and time consuming part of the
insurance process. Some carriers provide forms that
can be completed digitally or as online applications that Application Pointer: When filling out
you can complete at your convenience. If you are the Application, never withhold
evaluating whether it is worth your time to complete a specifically requested information,
new application, you can usually submit a copy of your however damaging it may appear to
last full insurance application to other carriers to get an be. Dishonesty at the application
idea of what the pricing is like. A few companies even stage can result in the carrier voiding
have short-form indication sheets that you can the policy leaving you without
complete in just a few minutes to get a non-binding
estimate.
The Declarations Page, as its name suggests, is generally a one page document that the carrier will
provide outlining the terms of your coverage including: the identity of the named insured, the policy's
period the limits of liability on a per claim and aggregate basis, and your deductible. Some policies
list the prior acts (retroactive) date on the declarations page and others identify this date in an
endorsement. This short summary details all the most important features of your policy in a simple to
understand format, and is generally sufficient proof of insurance if requested by one of the groups or
individuals for whom you provide legal services.
The Certificate of Insurance is a similar form, which also serves as proof of insurance, but in
circumstances where a more up to date document is required. If you are working, for example, with
2
a Real Estate Title company, they will often require proof of insurance as of the date of closing. In
this case, the Certificate of Insurance is the best document available because it is generated not at
the date of policy issuance, but as of the date requested, which assures that there has not been a
lapse in coverage. Also, unlike the Declarations Page, which is provided directly to the named
insured, the Certificate of Insurance is sent from the insurance company to the agency requesting
the proof of insurance, adding an additional layer of security. Most companies require that the
Certificate be requested in writing, but some companies will accept a verbal request or have
developed an automated online process for generating Certificates to help streamline the process for
attorneys who need faster service.
The Policy is the contract which governs the relationship between the company and the insured.
The standard parts of the policy are: the Definitions, Coverage Agreement, Exclusions, Defense &
Settlement Provisions, Limits of Liability, Conditions and Endorsements.
Definitions usually identify for whom coverage is provided. Examples of terms commonly used in the
policy include: Named Insured;
Predecessor Firms; Former Policy Pointer: Be cautious when reviewing the definitions.
lawyers, partners & For example most, but not all, policies provide coverage for
shareholders; Future lawyers, work done on behalf of the firm by former attorneys. This is
partners & shareholders; important to determine whether and under what
Former, current, or future non- circumstances departing attorneys will need to purchase
attorney employees; and extended reporting endorsements to protect them from
Attorneys serving in an "Of
Counsel" capacity.
The Coverage Agreement identifies the services, activities or actions that may be covered. It is well
to keep in mind, that malpractice policies are generally "claims made" coverage rather than
"occurrence" coverage. Auto and property insurance, for example, are occurrence types of coverage.
With an "occurrence" based policy, even though the policy may have expired, provided the policy
was in force at the time that the loss occurred, a claim can still be made against it. Where a policy is
written on a "claims-made" basis, this means that the policy in force at the time a claim against you is
made will pay for losses, regardless of when the error occurred in the past. This is true so long as
there has not been a constraint placed upon the retroactive date due to occurrences such as gaps in
coverage.
In general, legal malpractice policies may cover the following activities:
• Services as an attorney; • Services as a trustee or executor;

• Services as a mediator or arbitrator; • Services as a notary public.
• Services as a title agent;
The Exclusions identify what activities are not covered by a policy. If and when you file a claim with
the carrier, it will make a determination whether the claim is covered or excluded. Often times, it
utilizes outside coverage counsel to make this determination. If the carrier concludes that coverage
for the claim is excluded under the policy, then it will issue a detailed, written notice to you setting
forth the basis of its denial.
Many times, a malpractice plaintiff will plead several causes of action in the alternative. For example,
a legal malpractice claim may be expressed in Virginia as,
Policy Pointer: When choosing either, a negligence or breach of contract claim. Plaintiffs
malpractice insurance, it is well to routinely plead both of these claims in their complaints,
speak with other attorneys about their and in so doing, include claims of fraud or other intentional
experiences with their current and
prior malpractice carriers 3
torts, which are not covered under a standard malpractice policy. When faced with a lawsuit
containing covered and uncovered claims, the carrier will issue what is known as a "reservation of
rights" letter identifying the claims it will not provide indemnity coverage for in the face of an adverse
judgment. Because a carrier's duty to defend is broader than its duty to indemnify, many times a
carrier will continue to pay the costs of defense, even for the uncovered claims.
Examples of excluded activities can include:
• Dishonest acts; • Discrimination;

• Fraudulent acts (Actual Fraud); • Activities on Behalf of Family Members;
• Criminal Acts; • Disciplinary Proceedings
• Malicious Acts; • An attorney's actions or omissions while
• Worker's Compensation Claims; serving as an officer, director, etc., of a
• Bodily Injury or Property Damage; business not owned or controlled by the
• Punitive Damages; firm (including an attorney's service in a
• Sexual Harassment; local or specialty bar association).
Some carriers will provide limited coverage for certain types of claims through the use of special
policy or endorsement even if the carrier would normally be excluded. For example, attorneys who
regularly provide services on behalf of not-for-profit agencies on whose board they serve can request
that coverage be added to the policy for that work, so long as it is requested as part of the application
process and approved by the underwriter. Also, you should be aware that there can be protection
under the "innocent actor/party" provision in most policies for partners who did not participate in the
intentional dishonest, criminal, fraudulent or malicious acts of the co-defendants to a claim.
Defense & Settlement Provisions include items such as choice of defense counsel and consent to
settle provisions. Under most policies, the carrier has a list or panel of approved defense counsel it
uses for each jurisdiction. When an insured submits a claim, the carrier will then assign one of its
approved counsel to represent the insured. Some carriers have a standard policy provision which
allows the insured to participate in the selection process rather than forcing policy holders to rely
solely upon the carrier's decision.
Likewise, most policies require an insured's consent prior to a settlement. This issue can be quite
important for the lawyer who believes that he or she did not breach the standard of care.
Nevertheless, most policies also have a "hammer clause." If the carrier makes a determination that a
settlement is appropriate and you still withhold consent, the hammer clause allows the insurer to
protect itself by limiting its liability to the amount of the proposed settlement, leaving you on the hook
for any judgment above and beyond that settlement proposal.
The Limits of Liability are perhaps the most important part of any malpractice policy. In this section, a
policy will identify the per claim and aggregate limits of liability, defense cost allocation, and the
deductible.
A policy's limit is usually expressed in a per claim/annual aggregate manner. For example, given the
current claims experience most companies are seeing, the minimum recommended coverage for a
solo private practitioner is $250,000 per claim and $500,000 aggregate or “$250,000/$500,000.”
This means a lawyer has $250,000 in indemnity coverage for each claim filed for that policy period
and up to a total of $500,000 per policy period for all tendered claims. In determining the proper
policy limit, a lawyer should consider the nature and extent of his or her practice. Obviously firms
with more attorneys should generally carry higher limits, as should firms who handle cases of larger
than average monetary worth at stake.
1
However, when it comes to Defense Costs, some
Policy Pointer: To account for policies can be misleading. Most malpractice policies
differences between “inside the limits” provide that defense costs are "inside the limits of
and “outside the limits” policies, you liability." A policy that has defense costs inside the limits
can subtract the anticipated defense of liability is "self-liquidating" or "cannibalizing" in nature.
costs from the per claim policy limit.
This means that each dollar expended in defending the
You must be cautious when estimating
lawsuit, i.e., attorney's fees and expenses, is deducted
your defense costs, because complex
from the policy's limit thus decreasing the amount
litigation can be very expensive.
available to pay the client in settlement or judgment.
By way of example, let us assume the
average cost for defending
Some policies also have what is known as a "claims
substantiated claim in the State of allowance expense." A policy with this type of clause
Virginia is $40,000. A $250,000 per provides that the insurance carrier will pay a certain
l i li li it ith d f t amount of money towards defense costs before the
policy's limits begin to self liquidate. After that figure is
expended, the remaining defense costs are deducted from that policy's limits. Obviously, a policy
with these types of provisions can drastically reduce the indemnity coverage you thought you were
purchasing. As such, when you are purchasing a policy you should carefully consider whether you
want either of these provisos.
Another important factor is a policy's Deductible. Most malpractice policies contain deductible
clauses. A deductible can be applied on both a per claim and an aggregate basis. There are many
different options regarding when and why an insured may have to pay his or her deductible and this
issue should be fully discussed with the carrier or broker in obtaining a policy. If that deductible is
what as known as a "first dollar defense" or a "loss only" deductible then you only pay your
deductible if and when a settlement is reached or an adverse judgment is entered. Based upon
ALPS’ experience in Virginia, 62% of all claims for which defense costs were incurred resulted in no
actual losses. If those attorneys all had first dollar defense, they would not have incurred any out of
pocket expenses to resolve what were, by-and-large unsubstantiated claims. For obvious reasons,
this is an attractive option in many malpractice policies.
The Conditions section of a policy may include, but is not limited to, the following:
• A requirement that you, the insured, provide • A requirement that you, the insured, assist
timely notice to the carrier of all claims and and cooperate with the carrier and defense
potential claims; counsel in defending against the claim;
• A subrogation provision in favor of the
carrier;
Lastly, you should closely review the Endorsements and/or Riders to the policy. Whereas the body
of the policy is form in nature and meant to apply to all insureds, the Endorsements tailor a policy on
a lawyer-by-lawyer basis. Endorsements can do many things, including, adding or limiting a policy's
coverage, and identifying additional insureds.
Perhaps the most important endorsement any attorney will obtain in his or her career is when an
existing policy is about to lapse because the firm is dissolving or the lawyer is retiring. At that point,
the lawyer should consider obtaining an "Extended Reporting Period Endorsement." This
endorsement is often times colloquially, and indeed erroneously, referred to as "tail coverage." It is
not, in fact, new or different coverage or a new policy. Rather, the Endorsement simply extends the
time under the old, lapsing policy in which the attorney can submit a covered claim to the insurance
carrier for defense and indemnity coverage. Unless the departing attorney is covered by “former
attorney language”, he or she should strongly consider purchasing this additional endorsement,
6
especially since several companies offer free and/or low cost extended reporting if the attorney
becomes disabled, dies, retires, after being insured for a specified number of consecutive years with
the same carrier.
Conclusion
The legal malpractice insurance market is complex and offers many different options for Virginia
attorneys. Exercise caution and good judgment when you compare your options to make sure that
you and your client are going to be protected if and when a claim is presented. The Committee
would like to acknowledge and thank ALPS for its assistance in preparing this Guide.
7
7/14/2017 Virginia State Bar - Events - ALPS Bar Leaders Retreat
MEETINGS AND EVENTS
ALPS Bar Leaders Retreat

Wed, July 12, 2017 - Sun, July 16, 2017
Missoula, Montana
Updated: Jan 21, 2016
http://www.vsb.org/site/events/item/alps_bar_leaders_retreat 1/1
7/14/2017 Virginia State Bar - An Agency of the Supreme Court of Virginia
Latest News
Virginia State Bar E-News, July 2017

This month's news from the Virginia State Bar
Read More
6/29/2017 OAG, Department of Veterans Services and VSB Offer Legal Clinic for Veterans
6/23/2017 Nominations Sought for Board and Committee Vacancies
6/22/2017 VSB Seeks Nominations for Two Pro Bono Awards
6/20/2017 2017 Annual Meeting Featured Remarkable Words and Moments
6/19/2017 Highlights of the June 15, 2017, Virginia State Bar Council Meeting
6/17/2017 Leonard C. Heath Jr. is President-Elect of the VSB
More News
Meetings, Hearings, and Events

7/12/2017 - 7/16/2017 ALPS Bar Leaders Retreat
7/14/2017 Standing Committee on Legal Ethics
7/17/2017 VSB MCLE Board Meeting
7/17/2017 Lawyers Helping Lawyers
7/20/2017 - 7/22/2017 127th Virginia Bar Association Summer Meeting
7/20/2017 VSB Trusts and Estates Section Board of Governor’s Teleconference
7/27/2017 - 7/28/2017 VSB 37th Annual Disciplinary Conference
7/27/2017 VSB COLD Meeting
8/8/2017 2017 ABA Annual Meeting
8/9/2017 Criminal Discovery Reform Task Force
Complete calendar and featured events
http://www.vsb.org/ 1/1
Sent: Monday, July 24, 2017 12:03 PM
To: aghdami@williamsmullen.com; kb3sd@richmond.edu; ebarnes@barnesfamilylaw.com;
bbenos@williamsmullen.com; dboelzner@goodmanallen.com; corey.booker@leclairryan.com;
gborder@richmond.edu; claudia.brand@richmond.edu; lbrice@courts.state.va.us;
craig.burshem@dss.virginia.gov; jburtch@richmond.edu; harris.butler@butlerroyals.com;
sbyrne@richmond.edu; brian.cannon@richmond.edu; claire@stonecardwell.com;
ccollins@richmond.edu; ncook@richmond.edu; jcosby@vanblk.com; ashley.davis@allenandallen.com;
mdecker@richmond.edu; jellis3@richmond.edu; mellis@richmond.edu; astone2@richmond.edu;
stephen.faraci@leclairryan.com; lfrisina@pennstuart.com; fred@fgattorney.com; mike.gill@usdoj.gov;
paul_gill@fd.org; mgoodman@goodmanallen.com; carolyn_grady@fd.org; egriffin@oag.state.va.us;
tguare@guarelaw.com; elizabeth.wilson@richmond.edu; michael.herring@richmondgov.com;
vernon.inge@leclairryan.com; jivins@hf-law.com; djohnson@adm.idc.virginia.gov;
pkatz@richmond.edu; mary.langer@richmondgov.com; mary_maguire@fd.org;
bruce.matson@leclairryan.com; kmccaule@richmond.edu; McCauley, Jim <mccauley@vsb.org>;
mmccollum@jvrlawpc.com; jmeath@williamsmullen.com; lmelton@pcmglaw.com;
traci.miller@richmondgov.com; dmullen@mcguirewoods.com; dnovak@richmond.edu;
lparker@williamsmullen.com; rpartin@sandsanderson.com; jpembertonlaw@gmail.com;
jphillip@richmond.edu; jford@richmond.edu; briopel2@richmond.edu; jvr@jvrlawpc.com;
trohman@mcguirewoods.com; stephen.romine@leclairryan.com; mross@goodmanallen.com;
rrowlett@richmond.edu; mrubin@richmond.edu; connelia.savage@owens-minor.com;
cseltzer@richmond.edu; jsanchez@richmond.edu; bshelley@richmond.edu; bsnukals@richmond.edu;
jsteele@hf-law.com; jthomas@ip-counsel.net; tracy_thorne@icloud.com; ititley@richmond.edu;
robert_wagner@fd.org; michellew2005@yahoo.com; thomas.wolf@leclairryan.com;
aalhibri@richmond.edu; sallred@richmond.edu; rbacigal@richmond.edu; mbacigal@richmond.edu;
wberryhi@richmond.edu; pbirch@richmond.edu; cbrown5@richmond.edu; hbryson@richmond.edu;
jcampbe4@richmond.edu; tcasey@richmond.edu; dmargoli@richmond.edu; hchamber@richmond.edu;
tcoggins@richmond.edu; ecollin2@richmond.edu; ccorts@richmond.edu; ccotropi@richmond.edu;
pcrane@richmond.edu; ashley.dobbs@richmond.edu; jdougla2@richmond.edu; jeisen@richmond.edu;
depstein@richmond.edu; jerickso@richmond.edu; bfisher@richmond.edu; afrank@richmond.edu;
dfrisch@richmond.edu; jgibson@richmond.edu; cgiorget@richmond.edu; mharbach@richmond.edu;
mheen@richmond.edu; ahodges@richmond.edu; jjanto@richmond.edu; jjones@richmond.edu;
kklepfer@richmond.edu; clain@richmond.edu; mlo@richmond.edu; jmcconne@richmond.edu;
gmcdowel@richmond.edu; amoensse@richmond.edu; smotro@richmond.edu;
dmurphy@richmond.edu; kosenga@richmond.edu; jpagan@richmond.edu; wperdue@richmond.edu;
jpreis@richmond.edu; epaulett@richmond.edu; krobins2@richmond.edu; nsachs@richmond.edu;
dsamuels@richmond.edu; tschwartz@richmond.edu; rskalbeck@richmond.edu;
aspaldin@richmond.edu; jstubbs@richmond.edu; rsuddart@richmond.edu; atait@richmond.edu;
mtate@richmond.edu; ctobias@richmond.edu; avolenik@richmond.edu; mwalker1@richmond.edu;
kwalsh@richmond.edu; lawebb@richmond.edu; cwilliam@richmond.edu; jzarin@richmond.edu;
Wilson, Marcus H. (WF) (FBI) <marcus.wilson@ic.fbi.gov>; nova.corruption@ic.fbi.gov; doris@cvlas.org;
homeland.security@mail.house.gov; Whistleblower (Judiciary-Rep) <whistleblower@judiciary-
rep.senate.gov>
<James.Banks@alexandriava.gov>; Washington Field FBI Email <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>; NOVAPC
<novapc@ic.fbi.gov>; Doug Robelen <drobelen@vacourts.gov>; Simon, Noah
<Noah.Simon@mail.house.gov>; mherring@oag.state.va.us; Serrano, Margeaux S.
<mserrano@oag.state.va.us>; Cc: Mark Levine <mark@radioinsidescoop.com>; Dave Albo
<dave@davealbo.com>; DelLAdams@house.virginia.gov; DelLAird@house.virginia.gov;
info@juridicalsolutions.com; David Townsend <DavidMTownsendJD@yahoo.com>; Tom Jackman
<jackmant@washpost.com>; Robert.Michael@bww-law.com; Reza, S. Mohsin
<mohsin.reza@troutmansanders.com>; Zinsner, Mary C. <mary.zinsner@troutmansanders.com>; The
Washington Times <member@washingtontimesemail.com>; Howie Bierman <howie.bierman@bww-
law.com>; Perle, Scott I. <SPerle@mcguirewoods.com>; Lee, N. Patrick <plee@mcguirewoods.com>;
Noah Bookbinder <info@citizensforethics.org>; Response Action Network <info@responseaction.com>;
info@altright.com; newsdesk@wjla.com; Assignment Manager <newsroom@whsv.com>; Randy
Shulman <editor@metroweekly.com>; editor@washintonexaminer.com;
gazette@connectionnewspapers.com; editor@valawyersmedia.com; Adam Prather
<aprather@thehill.com>; John Arundel <jonarundel@aol.com>
Subject: * The Corruption in the Judiciary empowered by the VSB James McCauley, the JIRC, the
Supreme Court of Virginia and many others
Importance: Low
Dear Ladies and Gentlemen,
I have reached out to you before for help and been ignored. On
or around January 25, 2011 I had lunch in Arlington VA with Mr.
McCauley. The law and ethics are very clear. The Judiciary, the
Government and Elected Officials all police themselves are
COVERING UP for each other to line there pockets with money.
You will see Mr. McCauley had me send the criminal acts and
actions of Divorce Lawyer Ilona Ely Freedman Grenadier
Heckman my x-mother in law to his home, not to his office. He
then went on to Bully me and harass me for expecting him to
do his job that he is paid very well to do.
That this Cover Up includes our Attorney General Herring who

wants to be re-elected, our Governor as you will see in the
videos - If the Judiciary, the Government and the Elected
Officials are going to ignore the law and harm the public then
just state clearly that Virginia is NAZI Germany and move on if
you don't want to be our Slaves.
I attaching just one of my suits the Rico and Racketeering along

with an Outline of MURDER FOR HIRE has there has been
several attempts on my life. I was illegally Jailed and tortured
in the City of Alexandria - held in solitary confinement for 14
days with the hopes I would come out of jail and commit
Suicide - instead I am standing up and speaking out while Mr.
McCauley all others look the other way as I become homeless
so Divorce Lawyer Ilona Grenadier and Ben DiMuro can
continue on there crime spree stealing money and Real Estate
from many. But, they give great donations to the VSB et al and
isn't it about the money and how much you can steal from
someone like me. How you can force me to be homeless and
or to commit Suicide - How many peoples blood do you have
on your hands for your selfish acts or actions?
Why has this happened to me? Because I was naive - I didn't

know the Mafia Judiciary, Government and Elected Officials of
Virginia were so active in MURDER FOR HIRE - I had no clue
how there were no ethics or extremes you would go to protect
one of your own. I thought there would be one person - just
one person who would stand up for me - while I told the Truth -
But, there isn't. I am a dead person and my blood is on James
Macaulay's and many others hands.
The leaders in this “Gang” are Judge Donald Haddock and Judge
Donald Kent at least in the case of Janice Wolk Grenadier. In
the case of Chris Mackney it was Judge Bellows, who has now
overlapped into Janice’s with the cover up of the hits and the
trial of Charles Severance. That the following law firms have
dirty hands in collusion of these actors: Grenadier Anderson
Starace Duffett and Kieser, Keller Heckman, DiMuroGinsberg,
Troutman Sanders aka Mays & Valentine, BWW Law Group aka
Bierman Geesling Ward and Wood, Parker Simon & Kokolis LLC,
and other’s that are known and unknown.
Virginia Rated 47th and 49th in Corruption - Daily Beast rated

Virginia second most Corrupt State
- http://www.loudountimes.com/index.php/news/article/regio
n_survey_finds_virginia_second_most_corrupt_state987/ -
State Integrity Gave them an F - 47th most corrupt States

- http://www.stateintegrity.org/virginia That Janice is not alone
the corruption and lack of over site or Due Process in the courts
in Virginia, the Federal Courts of DC and Virginia is and are a
disgrace.
Yet to date October 3, 2015 Janice has not been interviewed by

the FBI in regard to the information in this article even with her
many phone calls to them – for help to protect herself and her
girls.
Update: Charles Severance was found guilty of the 3 killings

with no real evidence. - The evidence is clear he was not the
person at Target who stalked Nancy Dunning - his father stated
in the trial very clearly "That is not my son"
Divorce Lawyer Ilona Grenadier Heckman in Collusion with

Judge James Clark filed a lawsuit to foreclose on Janice’s home
with illegally gotten legal fees by DiMuroGinsberg and Michael
Weiser. Ilona has hired Heba Carter a lawyer who went to the
University of Richmond.
We have learned the University of Richmond is where in 1987

Judge Donald Kent best friend to Judge Donald Haddock was
President of the School and still today is on the Board.
James Comey and Senator Tim Kaine were both adjunct

Professors at the same time by all appearance at the University
of Richmond.
Clark can be found at www.valaw2010.blogspot.com in the case
filed against him in the City of Alexandria for injunctive relief
for his financial conflict along with other criminal activities.
But this E-mail of January 28, 2016 may say it better then
anything:
The lawyers did not show up in court. They did not have to file
anything – Judge James Clark was on their side as stated in the
below links
June 22, 2016 Janice Circuit Court of the City of Alexandria VA -

exposing the corruption - Judge James Clark states he and
Carter Land were Trustee's on all of Burke and Herbert Loans
for Friendship as he did on June 8, 2016. That Judge Clark
further stated no financial compensation from Burke and
Herbert band directly or indirectly. Which must mean the
lawyer representing Burke & Herbert 8 from his law firm would
have had to do it for free - "friendship" still illegal. Janice states
this is a "Shame Hearing" - Judge Clark States - "Not on this
side" since when does Judge's take
sides? https://youtu.be/Lo5U4FrvdwI
In May of 2016 learned that Judge Clark had a financial

relationship - I contacted the FBI and here is the conversation
with the FBI that has ignored it: https://youtu.be/DbdcVaZkItQ
These two videos show that I spoke with Gov. Terry McAuliffe
and Brian Moran and showed him my Box of evidence that -
that I had been illegally jailed and
tortured https://youtu.be/kQ1hRnaxvRc https://youtu.be/JevLl
GOtQBE
Janice Exposes the Corruption of the City of Alexandria - Nazi
Virginia the place Terrorist's can Buy $$$$
Justice https://youtube.com/watch?v=qhBZLmVynXc
Janice Wolk Grenadier asking / exposing Mark Warner for the

3rd time having the discussion he lied.
DSCF0005 - Jailed so Senator Mark Warner could be Re-elected
and https://youtu.be/rRs7cBEYAjQ
DSCF0039 Mark Warner Exposed as he Lies about what he
knows - YouTube https://youtu.be/O10opcNIqNA
These Videos are the tapes of Janice Wolk Grenadier Standing

UP and speaking out at the City of Alexandria Council Meeting
June 2016 COA Council Meeting COA June 18,2016 Council

Meeting exposing Judge James
Clark https://youtu.be/MXa5aVqLPPI
June 2016 Burke & Herbert Bank - Lying to me about the

subpoena and that he had no idea I was to come today after I
had already had a conversation with another person
there. https://youtu.be/gisnNjOgVk0
October 2016 City Council Meeting further exposing the

corruption in the City of
Alexandria https://youtu.be/vNKZD4a_6Fw
October 2016 - City of Alexandria Council Meeting - These two

tapes show the Financial Questionable
activity https://youtu.be/GaNI8TEzWLM and The disclosure of
the City Corruption in the finances - Private School $70,000 - for
tennis courts - COA funded $400,000 for tennis courts - the City
Paid $1.6 Million September 2016 City Council
Meeting https://youtu.be/7rSIZ2oTh7A
Right with Crime - CSPAN – Talking about the Corruption with

Judges https://youtu.be/lYM6ULrTfM0
February 2016 - The $602,000 SCAM of the
JIRC https://youtu.be/poQ6uHhSLXM
DSCF0008 - The Mortgage Crisis - Eric Holder Eric Holder and
the SCAM on the American People https://youtu.be/GjaZ6a--
aRM
DSCF0042 City of Alexandria Council Meeting January 2016 -
YouTube https://youtu.be/IZGoo4Bov1o
DSCF0047 City of Alexandria City Council Meeting December
2015 - YouTube https://youtu.be/yd9qz2ukExE
DSCF0048 City of Alexandria Council Meeting November 2015 -
YouTube https://youtu.be/OmJWgr_qf28
DSCF0050 City of Alexandria Council Meeting October 2015 -

YouTube https://youtu.be/cqj5DcHGS3c
DSCF0051 City of Alexandria Council Meeting September 2015 -
YouTube https://youtu.be/qGavoOLEcRY
DSCF0055 City of Alexandria Council Meeting June 2015 -
YouTube https://youtu.be/2qAc_YqdVUw
DSCF0056 City of Alexandria Council Meeting May 2015 -
YouTube https://youtu.be/2qAc_YqdVUw https://www.youtub
e.com/watch?v=poQ6uHhSLXM
City of Alexandria $602,000 Scam Council Meeting Feb 2016 -
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GDZ8UkJv78I Cato
Question where to go for Help with Sydney Powell – Licensed to
Lie - On July 25, 2014 Janice Wolk Grenadier asked "Where do
you go for help when your Due Process rights as an American
Citizen are violated?" You will be shocked by the
answer https://youtu.be/GDZ8UkJv78I 9
We send young men and women into harms way to fight for
rights that we no longer have as American Citizens. It is very
scary and until you are involved in a Slippery Slope of the
Collusion and Corruption of the Judicial System - it is difficult to
understand.
The entire event can be heard at http://cdn.cato.org/archive-

2014/cbf
Rico Information:
Complaint: https://www.scribd.com/doc/303506666/RicoRaci-
2-v-4-FINAL-JWG-vComplaint-October-17-2015 Documents the
Back up the RICO
Claims:https://www.scribd.com/doc/303508177/USDC-VA-
Exhibits-for-Rico-Rackering-Jan-6-2015
Read more at:
@ProSeAm
ProSeAmerica.net
That on Friday October 21, 2016 DOJ Joesph Guzinski stated

very clearly his not investigating the criminal acts and actions
was his concern for his own life, the retaliation and retribution
as well as when asked who is supervisor was he stated “The
White House” not the Department of Justice Or Loretta Lynch.
1. Janice has been reporting this corruption on a regular basis - I

know how bad it is and how horrid I have been treated and
could never understand and I knew everyone was being paid off
or afraid - but, I guess I never knew the extend -
2. On October 11, 2016 - Thomas Gorman (Bankruptcy Court

Trustee) was at the table and insisted with this other women -
that she had been ripped off by her lawyer - that he was going
to get the DOJ - Joseph Guzinski to investigate.
4. On October 13, 2016 in court. I was 3rd on the docket, at or

around 1.25 pm told I would be called by Mr. Gorman in about
or within 30 minutes
6. Then Mr. Gorman calls a women's name I unfortunately, did

not pay attention to the name - will need to figure it out - DOJ -
Mr. Guzinski goes up - he doesn't want anything to do with it.
Mr. Gorman fights for the women - who does not show up in
court so losses by default - but, Mr. Gorman puts on fight to
have it continued - to give it time to be investigated - he fights
with the Judge that she should be heard. He believes her and
he thinks she was taken advantage of.
7. I ask DOJ Mr. Guzinski to stay in the court, as I am to be

heard in the next half hour. He agrees turns around to stay -
Mr. Gorman and the Judge had seen me do this and had looked
me in the eye -
8. I believe one of them signaled him not to stay - after he

turned around and was on his way to sit - because he then
abruptly turned and said he couldn't. I then asked if he had a
card.
9. I now am sure Mr. Guzinski was motioned for him not to stay
by either Thomas Gorman or Judge Kenny
10. I was then left to be heard at the end. But, it wasn't just the
end. The Judge took a break, it was to be 10 minutes, Thomas
Gorman went running out of the court room - I believe and the
appearance was to the Judge.
11. It was about a 20-minute break and the hearing started. The
hearing was held after 4 pm - after court hours so no one else
could hear. The hearing was bulling to me and the ruling by the
Judge was unreasonable with no questions of substance asked
of me. At the end I stood and ask for the Judge's recusal he
refused.
12. I did get Exhibits into the record that show the TRUTH and
the corruption. Shows the pattern and practice and the criminal
acts and actions. 10 13. I would learn after research that Judge
Kenny went to the University of Richmond. the one common
denominator of all.
14. On Friday, October 14, 2016 I filed for the Judge to recuse
and Thomas Gorman be removed I file Criminal Claims sheets
with back up against Judge Clark and Ilona Grenadier Heckman.
I filed a Notice to be heard and was denied. I take a copy to the
Department of Justice as well as other Documents to Mr.
Guzinski I then e-mail other information and request a meeting
on Friday the 14th with Mr. Guzinski of the DOJ Mr. Guzinski
refuses the meeting saying he would read everything and then
get back to me. I continue sending Mr. Guzinski information /
things Now on Friday, October 21, I have evidence that is
confusing and want to meet with him to show it to him, it is
time for a meeting and he is ignoring me. I stop by his office
late in the afternoon. He YELLS at me. That he is not going to
meet with me and any information I have e-mail it to him.
When I state "This is my Life" in a very calm and professional
manner he states - angry and all red faced yelling at me "NO -
THIS IS ABOUT MY LIFE - ME" I was extremely taken back.
shocked - to me it was one more person saying I was a
NOBODY. When I left the office since I had not recorded it - I sat
down and wrote the whole thing out, that he was more
concerned about himself and how this would outcome him
then me. That he was afraid of the Retaliation and Retribution
on him, then what I had been through. That he wasn't going to
help me - because he most likely at or around 50 was to afraid
of loosing his pension - is what I wrote. That he didn't give a shit
about me - he was only concerned about himself and the
retaliation and retribution against him was not worth doing the
right thing. As you may or may not know I reached out to
everyone -
15. On Sunday night October 23, 2016 ( and now I am going to

work back words with the evidence that shows the collusion of
Gov. McAuliffe and the DOJ / FBI.
16. The two articles released late on the 23rd show the
collusion and the payoffs to the officials in the FBI - as everyone
knows Terry McAuliffe was the fund raiser and got Bill Clinton
elected to the President. He was supposed to be 1st choice for
VP. The plan was he would run for Governor - and it was just a
stepping stone - I have been loud and standing up and speaking
out a problem for all of them since 2010. That they couldn't
control. As you can see in the above links
17. Clinton Ally Aided Campaign of FBI Official’s Wife – WSJ

$675,000.
18. http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/2016/10/23/virginia-
gov-terry-mcauliffe-donated-467500-to-campaign-of-wife-of-
senior-fbiofficial-who-oversaw-clinton-email-probe/VIRGINIA
GOV. TERRY MCAULIFFE DONATED $467,500 TO CAMPAIGN OF
WIFE OF SENIOR FBI OFFICIAL WHO OVERSAW CLINTON EMAIL
PROBE Virginia Gov. Terry McAuliffe is a Clinton goon and as
corrupt as it gets. So it should be no surprise that McAuliffe
donated $467,500 to campaign of state senate campaign of the
wife of an FBI official. You say why is this a big deal? Because
that senior FBI official is Andrew McCabe who oversaw the
Hillary Clinton email probe. Commie Comey’s corruption is
looking much more clear these days. The political organization
of Virginia Gov. Terry McAuliffe, an influential Democrat with
longstanding ties to Bill and Hillary Clinton, gave nearly
$500,000 to the election campaign of the wife of an official at
the Federal Bureau of Investigation who later helped oversee
the investigation into Mrs. Clinton’s email use. Campaign
finance records show Mr. McAuliffe’s political-action
committee donated $467,500 to the 2015 state Senate
campaign of Dr. Jill McCabe, who is married to Andrew
McCabe, now the deputy director of the FBI. The Virginia
Democratic Party, over which Mr. McAuliffe exerts considerable
control, donated an additional $207,788 worth of support to
Dr. McCabe’s campaign in the form of mailers, according to the
records. That adds up to slightly more than $675,000 to her
candidacy from entities either directly under Mr. McAuliffe’s
control or strongly influenced by him. The figure represents
more than a third of all the campaign funds Dr. McCabe raised
in the effort. Mr. McAuliffe and other state party leaders
recruited Dr. McCabe to run, according to party officials. She
lost the election to incumbent Republican Dick Black.
19. In May of 2016 - Terry McAuliffe was going to be speaking

in Alexandria - I decide to show up. My lucky day - the news
media for all stations was following him around like crazy. Not
the sound, but, my picture as you can see in this video was
everywhere - you will notice the box and the picture. The box is
the box of un-open evidence that I have and the picture is of
the Mark Stuart who was hired - under Judge Clark's direction
to help him find me incompetent. When the Alexandria Police
were called - I was told the Commonwealth Attorney - Randy
Sengel said they were not allowed to take any police reports
from me. Same YouTube as above: 11 You tube me and Terry
McAuliffe https://youtu.be/kQ1hRnaxvRc You will see in this
that I am showing him my evidence and the picture - the media
according to them had deleted all the verbal conversation of
me and him. This came from ABC
20 - The articles of the $120,000 from a Chinese business man
and the other video that ABC gave me Youtube
- https://youtu.be/JevLlGOtQBE
The Articles - http://freebeacon.com/issues/doj-investigates-

mcauliffe-donation-chinese-clinton-
backer/ http://freebeacon.com/issues/doj-investigates-
mcauliffe-donation-chinese-clinton-backer/ As you can see on
my Facebook page most of the links to this story are corrupt
21. BELOW is a link to the FBI one of the many conversations I

have tried to have with them - I caught this one agent off guard
- she even gave her page # - but again she did not ever follow
up with me - no matter how many e-mails etc - Unfortunately I
was late to the record everything Above you will see a link to
the FBI for 06-08-2016 - with me very comely telling the
investigator - what is happening. I also have the e-mails
22. I start googling and doing outlines on all he players and

learn the common ground is the University of Richmond and
The University of Richmond law School also known as TC
Williams Law School. That in googling adjunct professor you
learn they make between $5,000 - $20,000. I have learned
privately they make $35,000 - $50,000
23. I also learned that Judge Kent King or head of the Old Boys
Network was the president of the school in 1987 24. Tim Kaine
was an adjunct Professor for 6 years
25. James Comey was an Adjunct Professor, since being with
the FBI speaks there regularly (Paid), has won awards from the
school which brings gifts, and then paid for commencement
speech May of 2016.
o James Comey would then go on to do several interviews with

the press that he had put several people in jail for far less then
the criminal actions of Hillary Clinton
o James Comey came to Richmond from NYC - where he
worked with Loretta Lynch
o James Comey stated it was his job to give the information to
the DOJ and there job to decide the charges
o James Comey after Bill Clinton met with Loretta Lynch on the
tar mac became the spokes person for stating "HRC did nothing
wrong was just sloppy" in direct conflict of what he had said in
the past The above evidence I believe shows without a doubt
the corruption and the purchase of the FBI / DOJ why we can
not get any help in our cases and have nowhere to go for help
26. We also don't want to forget about the cover-up of Michael

Gardner and how our Virginia Legislature and the FBI kept silent
the removal of our Supreme Court Justice Cynthia Kinser as she
let him out of jail so he could hire ah Hit man to kill the girls.
27. Further in DC you don't want to forget about the removal of

Judge Richard Roberts after RAPING a 16 year old Victim – the
Judges have ignored his crimes and his retired with full pay and
benefits https://www.washingtonian.com/2016/09/08/one-
dcs-powerful-judges-got-accused-
rape/ http://abovethelaw.com/2016/09/a-detailed-dive-into-
the-rape-allegations-against-a-former-federal-
judge/ http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/mar/17/
dc-federal-judge-to-retire-following-1980s-rape-ac/ He was
closely involved in the Cover-Up of my cases in the District of
Columbia Federal Court - He was retired with full benefits and
we will all pay for his fun and freedom for the rest of his life.
I fight back Standing Up and Speaking out December 2016 with

the Virginia Legislature I spoke twice during the morning prior
to going to over to the Supreme Court to find an “ORDER”
issued denying my Emergency Motion to “Stay” all of Judge
Clarks orders. Justice Lemons Retaliation and Retribution was
swift.
Outing of the $602,000 SCAM the

Judge Johnston
- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vmtaDPQ_w2A
Judge Parker for Sally Minetree

- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GvSeBt-3WxU
Judge Appeals Court

VA https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eY5NHLLOFb0
disingenuous statements by Judge Parker. Judge Parker abused
his power and it was clear. Giving the Judge's the last word is a
practice to protect the lawyers on the panel to win in his court
room. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NapE1NFROYk&t=1
3s 12
This is the Link for June 22 2016 hearing in the City of

Alexandria - Where you hear Judge James Clark state that he is
on the side of the Defendants further state that he never made
a cent off of his being a Trustee for every loan Burke & Herbert
did and he was Trustee for each one. It was a shame hearing by
a Judge who will go to any length to Cover Up the criminal
spree of Divorce Lawyer Ilona Grenadier
Heckman. https://youtu.be/Lo5U4FrvdwI
We all must support Trump as he is supporting us in the

Corruption of the Courts - Consider Intervene or a Declaration
more will be coming out in the next few days through ProSe
America how to support President Donald J. Trump and his EO
in keeping Americans
safe. http://www.therevolutionaryconservative.com/articles/ci
vil-rights/2017- 02-18-pro-trump-advocates-intervene-ACLU-
lawsuit.html
Fighting B.A.C.K. with Host Sandra Grazzini-

Rucki http://www.blogtalkradio.com/futureofourchildren/2017
/03/03/fighting-back-with-host-sandra-grazzini-rucki
Videos Exposing the Corruption:
The Banks and Foreclosure https://youtu.be/GjaZ6a--aRM

Law Day May 2017 the
Solution https://youtu.be/bFOB33A8yaM
COA October 2017 https://youtu.be/vNKZD4a_6Fw
Right with Crime What about those
COA Dec 2015 https://youtu.be/yd9qz2ukExE
COA Jan 2016 https://youtu.be/IZGoo4Bov1o Mark Warner
Exposed https://youtu.be/O10opcNIqNA
COA Sept 2015 https://youtu.be/qGavoOLEcRY COA June
2015 https://youtu.be/2qAc_YqdVUw
COA Sept 2016 https://youtu.be/7rSIZ2oTh7A COA Oct
2016 https://youtu.be/GaNI8TEzWLM
COA Feb 2016 https://youtu.be/poQ6uHhSLXM COA Oct
2015 https://youtu.be/cqj5DcHGS3c
COA June 2017 Murder Stuart back June 14,
DOJ Hangs up on JWG June 2017 https://youtu.be/Rz28-
NiXaDg
DC Police March 2017 on Seth Rich
Severance https://youtu.be/TjV7kZl8q4g
May 2017 Federal Society on
Comey https://youtu.be/NBXNNCrcdsI
COA May 2017 https://youtu.be/wQ8zvWECIds
COA Council Meeting 12-17-
2016 https://youtu.be/WEMNcWjMQwY
NAN Breakfast MLK Jan 2017 https://youtu.be/wEEbTrlnXRU
Jan 2017 COA https://youtu.be/iMNDABk19uE
FBI conv 10 30 2016 video 6m26s webcamera
io https://youtu.be/nxuqNc75T-c
COA July 22, 2016 Court hearing video RAPE by Judge James
Clark https://youtu.be/Lo5U4FrvdwI
Oct 2016 subpoena Grenadier https://youtu.be/JevLlGOtQBE

COA June 2016 Nazi Virginia the place Terrorist's can Buy $$$$
Justice https://youtu.be/qhBZLmVynXc
Burke & Herbert Bank Lies have they acted
Criminally? https://youtu.be/gisnNjOgVk0
JWG Spring St Feb 2013 2 https://youtu.be/NePveOTCupE
DSCF0007 - Murder of Hire in Virginia the
Norm https://youtu.be/Eocg-MFj_Qs
DSCF0008 - The Mortgage Crisis - Eric
Holder https://youtu.be/GjaZ6a--aRM
Copy of City of Alexandria, Virginia Council Meeting May 16,
2015 267 https://youtu.be/pRIBnUYh-4Y DSCF0055 City of
Alexandria Council Meeting June
DSCF0048 City of Alexandria Council Meeting November
2015 https://youtu.be/OmJWgr_qf28
DSCF0050 City of Alexandria Council Meeting October
Please - I beg you to look at this information and the injustice
that has been done to me and to Sonia Grenadier the mother of
Judge Albert Grenadier - I need someone to help me. I don't
want to believe that everyone in the Judiciary, the Government
and the Elected Officials are this EVIL.
JW Grenadier
www.JAMJustice.org
1 Corinthians 13:13
Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2017 5:03 PM
To: aghdami@williamsmullen.com; kb3sd@richmond.edu; Edward Barnes
<ebarnes@barnesfamilylaw.com>; bbenos@williamsmullen.com; dboelzner@goodmanallen.com;
corey.booker@leclairryan.com; gborder@richmond.edu; claudia.brand@richmond.edu;
lbrice@courts.state.va.us; Craig Burshem <craig.burshem@dss.virginia.gov>; jburtch@richmond.edu;
harris.butler@butlerroyals.com; Sean Byrne <sbyrne@richmond.edu>; brian.cannon@richmond.edu;
claire@stonecardwell.com; ccollins@richmond.edu; ncook@richmond.edu; Austin Cosby
<jcosby@vanblk.com>; ashley.davis@allenandallen.com; mdecker@richmond.edu;
jellis3@richmond.edu; mellis@richmond.edu; astone2@richmond.edu; stephen.faraci@leclairryan.com;
lfrisina@pennstuart.com; fred@fgattorney.com; mike.gill@usdoj.gov; paul_gill@fd.org;
mgoodman@goodmanallen.com; carolyn_grady@fd.org; egriffin@oag.state.va.us;
pkatz@richmond.edu; mary.langer@richmondgov.com; mary_maguire@fd.org; Bruce Matson
<bruce.matson@leclairryan.com>; kmccaule@richmond.edu; McCauley, Jim <mccauley@vsb.org>;
lparker@williamsmullen.com; rpartin@sandsanderson.com; Jayne Pemberton
<jpembertonlaw@gmail.com>; jphillip@richmond.edu; jford@richmond.edu; briopel2@richmond.edu;
John Robinson <jvr@jvrlawpc.com>; trohman@mcguirewoods.com; stephen.romine@leclairryan.com;
mross@goodmanallen.com; rrowlett@richmond.edu; mrubin@richmond.edu; connelia.savage@owens-
minor.com; cseltzer@richmond.edu; jsanchez@richmond.edu; bshelley@richmond.edu;
bsnukals@richmond.edu; jsteele@hf-law.com; jthomas@ip-counsel.net; tracy_thorne@icloud.com;
ititley@richmond.edu; robert_wagner@fd.org; michellew2005@yahoo.com;
thomas.wolf@leclairryan.com; aalhibri@richmond.edu; Steve Allred <sallred@richmond.edu>;
rbacigal@richmond.edu; mbacigal@richmond.edu; wberryhi@richmond.edu; pbirch@richmond.edu;
cbrown5@richmond.edu; hbryson@richmond.edu; jcampbe4@richmond.edu; tcasey@richmond.edu;
dmargoli@richmond.edu; hchamber@richmond.edu; tcoggins@richmond.edu; ecollin2@richmond.edu;
ccorts@richmond.edu; ccotropi@richmond.edu; pcrane@richmond.edu; ashley.dobbs@richmond.edu;
jdougla2@richmond.edu; Joel Eisen <jeisen@richmond.edu>; depstein@richmond.edu;
jerickso@richmond.edu; bfisher@richmond.edu; afrank@richmond.edu; dfrisch@richmond.edu; Jim
Gibson <jgibson@richmond.edu>; cgiorget@richmond.edu; mharbach@richmond.edu;
rep.senate.gov>
info@altright.com; newsdesk@wjla.com; Assignment Manager <newsroom@whsv.com>
Subject: * James McCauley Ethics Guru - Had the information to prevent all the criminal acts and actions
described below against Janice Wolk Grenadier
Importance: Low
Dear Ladies and Gentlemen.
or around January 25, 2011 I had lunch in Arlington VA with
Mr. McCauley. The law and ethics are very clear. The Judiciary,
the Government and Elected Officials all police themselves are
See Attached
actions of Divorce Lawyer Ilona Ely Freedman
Grenadier Heckman my x-mother in law to his home, not to his
office. He then went on to Bully me and harass me for
expecting him to do his job that he is paid very well to do.


Suicide - instead I am standing up and speaking out while
Mr. McCauley all others look the other way as I become
homeless so Divorce Lawyer Ilona Grenadier and
Ben DiMuro can continue on there crime spree stealing money
and Real Estate from many. But, they give great donations to
the VSB et al and isn't it about the money and how much you
can steal from someone like me. How you can force me to be
homeless and or to commit Suicide - How many peoples blood
do you have on your hands for your selfish acts or actions?

dirty hands in collusion of these actors: Grenadier
Anderson Starace Duffett and Kieser,
Keller Heckman, DiMuroGinsberg, Troutman Sanders aka Mays
& Valentine, BWW Law Group aka Bierman Geesling Ward and
Wood, Parker Simon & Kokolis LLC, and other’s that are known
and unknown.


disgrace.
girls.


with illegally gotten legal fees by DiMuroGinsbergand
Michael Weiser. Ilona has hired Heba Carter a lawyer who went
to the University of Richmond.


of Richmond.
anything:
below links

These two videos show that I spoke with Gov.

Terry McAuliffe and Brian Moran and showed him my Box of
evidence that - that I had been illegally jailed and
GOtQBE






tennis courts - COAfunded $400,000 for tennis courts - the City

February 2016 - The $602,000 SCAM of
the JIRC https://youtu.be/poQ6uHhSLXM
aRM

understand.
2014/cbf
Rico Information:
Back up the RICO
Read more at:

@ProSeAm
ProSeAmerica.net

Outline FBI / DOJcorruption / Bankruptcy Cover Up and others



me in the eye -

card.
end. The Judge took a break, it was to be 10 minutes,
Thomas Gorman went running out of the court room - I believe
and the appearance was to the Judge.
refused.
denominator of all.
14. On Friday, October 14, 2016 I filed for the Judge

to recuse and Thomas Gorman be removed I file Criminal
Claims sheets with back up against Judge Clark
and IlonaGrenadier Heckman. I filed a Notice to be heard and
was denied. I take a copy to the Department of Justice as well
as other Documents to Mr. Guzinski I then e-mail other
information and request a meeting on Friday the 14th with
Mr. Guzinski of the DOJ Mr. Guzinski refuses the meeting saying
he would read everything and then get back to me. I continue
sending Mr. Guzinski information / things Now on Friday,
October 21, I have evidence that is confusing and want to meet
with him to show it to him, it is time for a meeting and he is
ignoring me. I stop by his office late in the afternoon. He YELLS
at me. That he is not going to meet with me and any
information I have e-mail it to him. When I state "This is my
Life" in a very calm and professional manner he states - angry
and all red faced yelling at me "NO - THIS IS ABOUT MY LIFE -
ME" I was extremely taken back. shocked - to me it was one
more person saying I was a NOBODY. When I left the office
since I had not recorded it - I sat down and wrote the whole
thing out, that he was more concerned about himself and how
this would outcome him then me. That he was afraid of the
Retaliation and Retribution on him, then what I had been
through. That he wasn't going to help me - because he most
likely at or around 50 was to afraid of loosing his pension - is
what I wrote. That he didn't give a shit about me - he was only
concerned about himself and the retaliation and retribution
against him was not worth doing the right thing. As you may or
may not know I reached out to everyone -

17. Clinton Ally Aided Campaign of FBI Official’s Wife

– WSJ $675,000.
corrupt as it gets. So it should be no surprise
that McAuliffe donated $467,500 to campaign of state senate
campaign of the wife of an FBI official. You say why is this a big
deal? Because that senior FBI official is Andrew McCabe who
oversaw the Hillary Clinton email probe. Commie Comey’s
corruption is looking much more clear these days. The political
organization of Virginia Gov. Terry McAuliffe, an influential
Democrat with longstanding ties to Bill and Hillary Clinton, gave
nearly $500,000 to the election campaign of the wife of an
official at the Federal Bureau of Investigation who later helped
oversee the investigation into Mrs. Clinton’s email use.
Campaign finance records show Mr. McAuliffe’s political-action
campaign of Dr. Jill McCabe, who is married to
Andrew McCabe, now the deputy director of the FBI. The
Virginia Democratic Party, over which Mr. McAuliffe exerts
considerable control, donated an additional $207,788 worth of
support to Dr. McCabe’s campaign in the form of mailers,
according to the records. That adds up to slightly more than
$675,000 to her candidacy from entities either directly under
Mr. McAuliffe’s control or strongly influenced by him. The
figure represents more than a third of all the campaign funds
Dr. McCabe raised in the effort. Mr. McAuliffe and other state
party leaders recruited Dr. McCabe to run, according to party
officials. She lost the election to incumbent Republican Dick
Black.

were called - I was told the Commonwealth Attorney -
Randy Sengel said they were not allowed to take any police
reports from me. Same YouTube as above: 11 You tube me and
Terry McAuliffe https://youtu.be/kQ1hRnaxvRc You will see in
this that I am showing him my evidence and the picture - the
media according to them had deleted all the verbal
conversation of me and him. This came from ABC

and the other video that ABC gave
me Youtube - https://youtu.be/JevLlGOtQBE


learn they make between $5,000 - $20,000. I
have learned privately they make $35,000 - $50,000

speech May of 2016.




issued denying my Emergency Motion to “Stay” all of
Judge Clarks orders. Justice Lemons Retaliation and Retribution
was swift.
Outing of the $602,000 SCAM
the JIRC https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NapE1NFROYk&t
=5s
Judge Johnston
Judge Parker for

Sally Minetree - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GvSeBt-
3WxU
Judge Appeals Court

3s 12

spree of Divorce
Lawyer Ilona Grenadier Heckman. https://youtu.be/Lo5U4Frvd
wI

more will be coming out in the next few days
through ProSe America how to support President Donald J.
Trump and his EO in keeping Americans
lawsuit.html


NiXaDg
May 2017 Federal Society
on Comey https://youtu.be/NBXNNCrcdsI
FBI conv 10 30 2016 video
6m26s webcamera io https://youtu.be/nxuqNc75T-c


Warmly,
JW Grenadier
www.JAMJustice.org
1 Corinthians 13:13
The Many Victims No Pictures of

of Michael Gardner John Doe
The Young Girls And
Molested who
Dr. Robert
Stood Up
After having a Hit Rixse
Man Hired to take RIP
Chris Mackney *Janice Wolk Grenadier *Ruth Ann Lodato *Ron Kirby them out Murder for
*Nancy Dunning *Megan Owen Barry
Suicide Survivor Murder for Hire Suicide Survivors
Hire
Murder for Hire
Murder for Hire and Questionable Suicide’s in the City of Alexandria / Northern Virginia / DC
This puts together several known facts – through the life of Janice Wolk Grenadier and different News articles and book facts
from “Bullied to Death” the Chris Mackney story, Edited and Published by FamilyCourt.com, INC attorney Michelle McDonald, written
by: Mike Volpe. That the obvious is being covered up by the FBI, the Judiciary, the Government and Elected Officials who are using
there personal “POWER and FINANCIAL POWER” to illuminate those that they find annoying or whom may get in their way through
Murder for Hire or Questionable Suicides, illegal jailing that when put together it shows a pattern and practice of the “Old Boys
Network” in the State of Virginia. What do they all have in Common Governor Terry McAuliffe had something at Stake?
Pete Scamardo in 1968 hired a hit man Charles Harrelson to kill his child hood friend Sam Delegia Jr, which brings the
question was the idea of how to get rid of your spouse / or other brought to the Old Boys Network in the 70’s by Pete Scamardo as the
hits known begain in or around 1984 with Dr. Rixsey. That by the 1990’s in two Commercial / Land Development Association known
Nationwide with headquarters in the City of Alexandria Pete Scamardo was President, Chairman on the boards as an active citizen –
hiding his true idenity and past criminal history from the locals. This started to unravel, to be exposed through the divorce of his daughter
to Chris Mackney who would take his own life in December of 2013 from the bullying of Pete Scamardo, his attorneys whom he paid
handsomly and Judge Bellows who today is the Judge for Charles Severance. That Judge Bellows by all apperance in the news and record
has disallowed any negative information or truth on the spouses / third parties or issues the victims may have been having with others
prior to opening their front doors in the City of Alexandria and being MURDERED.
That where Janice Wolk Grenadier live’s in a circle around Janice thier have been 5 known Murder type hits – Dr. Rixsey, John Doe,
Nancy Dunning ( which you will read came to Janice’s home twice to check on Janice, now believed Nancy knew more and was from
what Nancy said afraid of what could happen and maybe knew what was going to happen to her) Ron Kirby and Ruth Ann Lodato. That
all five have strong connections to the Old Boys Network.
July 1. 1984 Who shot Dr. Robert Rixse / Murdered for opening his front door. We know who hired the killer – the boyfriend of his x-
wife. But what is the evidence of who shot him? Did the bullets that killed Dr. Rixse in 1984 match the bullets of Nancy Dunning and
1
others? Where they tested? The story the police released was the murderer with no evidence was a man floating in the Potomac dead
whom had Mafia ties. Easy for the City of Alexandria police and the FBI as they consider this murder solved.
We then have unknown date and name of John Doe Murdered for opening his front door in the City of Alexandria, also connected to
the Old Boys Network and Murdered, whom has received no real press that can be found.
Then on or around September 3rd of 1997 that on an unexpected cab ride to the airport as Janice’s x-husband David Grenadier (son of
the late Judge Albert Grenadier and step-son of Divorce Lawyer Ilona Ely Freedman Grenadier Heckman of Greanadier Anderson Starace
Duffett and Kieser) as he was suppose to take Janice to the airport and was late, Janice was outside waiting and not in her home. Janice’s
x-hsuband as Janice had called him to find out where he was – started yelling at her and saying a cab was on the way. Janice can persume
now his disappointment the money it appears he and Ilona spent to have Janice killed has come back to haunt them. When Janice got in
the cab and the driver could hear David yelling he said to Janice hang up the phone, hang up the phone if you don’t hang up the phone I
will pull over and hang it up for you. Janice hung up the phone, the driver than said we can take care of that for $5,000.00 – you don’t
have it – then $2,000 we can work it out. Janice was handed a phone number, Janice tossed it in the trash can thinking it had been a set up
– Janice now believes with out question it was to be a hit and today she was to be dead. Janice has never been questioned by the City of
Alexandria Police or the FBI even though she has reached out several times with her information.through Commonwealth Attorney Brian
Porter & Sheriiff Lawhorene (who had her tourtured in jail)That in February / March of 1998 Nancy Dunning who would open her front
door in 2003 came to Janice on different occations to check on her safty. The question know arrises was she aware of the outcome that
was meant for Janice in September of 1997.
November 1997 That Lawyer Ilona in collusion with David Grenadier, Andrea Grenadier, Robin Grenadier passed a rumor around that
caused David Grenadier to pull a gun in the home with Janice’s girls in the home.
February 2003 the Suicide of Megan Owen Barry wife of Fairfax County Sheriff Stan G. Barry – The Washington Post reported that at
12:30 am Sheriff Barry had stepped out and when he came back his wife had committed suicide. The Blue Wall calls this a Murder, but
of course no investigation.
December 2003 the Murder of Nancy Dunning wife of City of Alexandria Sheriff James Dunning – never questioned “oops” say the
Police when Dunning dies in South Carolina a few days after Janice Wolk Grenadier on the radio questions the investigation or lack of
investigation into the Murder.
March of 2011 – City of Alexandria police, Fire and Ambulance come to the home of Janice Wolk Grenadier while she is on travel – she
is supposedly “DEAD” in the home? There is no record of this in the City of Alexandria. Two neighbors have confirmed this with
Janice and the one who convinced the police to not hack down her door but to allow him to open it with the key he had. It was not till
June of 2011 when Janice’s neighbor shared this with her she became aware of it. When researched their is no record yet two other
neighbors have confirmed this.
December 2011 / February 2012 – Deliberate tampering with knowledgeable intend of the Grand Jury by Judge Potter and
October 2012 – Janice’s documents submitted into the record, when she went to check that they had been filed – she is told to take them
or they would throw them out, Janice refused to take them and then they are mailed back to her by Judge’s Kemler, Dawkins and Clark.
The box about 4” thick has been x-rayed and shows the documents but, never opened still In the box
December / January time frame of 2012 & 2013 Lawyer Ilona in collusion with others as a favor or hired a
gentleman that goes by the name of Mark Stuart who informs Janice he was to drug Janice and get sexual inappropriate pictures of Janice,
or to rape one of Janice’s daughters, or to plant drugs on Janice’s daughter or in the home to give Circuit Court Judge’s Kemler, Dawkins
and Clark, information to make JWG incompetent to file any other documents. Mr. Stuart said that “Lawyer Ilona will go to any length to
harm Janice or Janice’s daughters”. That Lawyer Ilona will continue to do what she can to distract Janice from becoming successful and
moving on with Janice’s life. That Lawyer Ilona is a “Greedy Jew” that all Lawyer Ilona’s actions are deliberate to cause harm to Janice.
When the Alexandria Police were called they informed Janice they were instructed by Commonwealth Attorney Randy Sengel to
not take any reports of issue.
*****The FIRST Picture of the person who Murdered Ruth Ann Ladoto resembled Mark Stuart
2
******On JUNE 14, 2017 at the shootings of the Congressman the following pictures show him walking
away from me – and then as I hid he came back and I got the following pictures Secret Service, Capital
Police all are ignoring the threat this man plays:
3
December of 2013 – Ilona Grenadier Heckman and Presidential Candidate Loretta Lax Miller do a “HATE OF CATHOLICS, CHRISTIONS
et al” Blog – jwgrenadierisalair.blogspot.com taken down while Janice is in jail.
February 18, 2014 - FBI cautions residents of public corruption in Va. - http://www.wusa9.com/story/news/local/2014/02/18/fbi-cautions-
residents-of-public-corruption-in-northern-virginia/5585877/ WASHINGTON (WUSA) -- The Federal Bureau of Investigation's (FBI) Washington Field Office is looking to identify any public corruption
occurring in Northern Virginia. The FBI says public corruption can occur "when a public official, at any level of government – local, state or federal – does any official act in exchange for money, or other free
goods or services, for private gain. Public corruption could also include public employees who take something of value for their own personal gain, thereby violating the public's trust." The FBI says many of
their investigations into public corruption start once they receive a tip from someone. If you want to help identify potential criminal activity, the Washington Field Office has set up a Northern Virginia Public
Corruption Hotline at 703-686-6225 and you can also e-mail them at NOVAPC@ic.fbi.gov.

4
October 11, 2014 – Breaking news Senator Mark Warner and aid to Governor Terry McAuliffe guilty and
admit to offering a Federal Judgeship to daughter of Phil Puckett
October 14, 2014 – Janice exposes on Blog VaLaw2010.blogspot.com information of corruption by Senator
Warner
October 22, 2014 – November 12, 2014 – 22 days Janice illegally jailed and tortured in the City of Alexandria,
Solitaire Confinement till 5pm on Election day Tuesday, November 4, 2014. Illegally Jailed to: 1. Silence her and stop exposure of e-
mails between herself and Mark Warner’s office on the corruption in the Judiciary. Janice went to Mark Warner for help instead he had
her jailed, at the same time it was exposed his “Pay to Play” with a Federal Judgeship for a favor. Being ignored by the Senate Ethics
Committee. 2. To Bully / scare her into either committing Suicide or to turning the other check of the corruption and not holding
Virginia and the Federal Judiciary, the Government and Elected Officials accountable, as well as the criminal acts and actions of the Old
Boys Network in Virginia
That the law is very clear: That Judge Clarks actions have turned back time. Giving me less rights then a slave. Taking someone under
Title 42 US Code 1994 and Title 18 US Code 1581(a): Whoever holds or returns any person to a condition of PEONAGE, shall be fined
under this title for imprisoned not more than 20 years or both. That on October 22, 2014 I was placed in jail for failure to pay legal fees in
30 days which is a violation of my Thirteenth Amendment "Neither Slavery not involuntary servitude, except as punishment for a crime
where of the party shall have duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any subject to their Jurisdiction". Furthermore the
right by placing me "under" a state Peonage / Involuntary Servitude violating the Fourth Amendment right by malicious prosecution, false
imprisonment and unconstitutional arrest. This violation of my Eight Amendment Right as to Excessive Bail which in this case
constitutes "Restitution Bail" which further shows the knowledgeable malicious intent to silence me till the election was over on
December 2015 – Defendant Janice Wolk Grenadier Stands up and speaks out against the Criminal Acts of Judge Nolan Dawkins in
Regard to his re-appointment - In front of the Courts of Justice in the Virginia Legislature – Several other Victims also stood up and spoke
out about the criminal actions of other Virginia Judges Courts of Justice A group of Elected Officials / Lawyers who practice in front of
these Judges
The Professional Code of Responsibility of the Lawyers on the Courts of Justice Rule 8.4 Misconduct It is professional misconduct
for a lawyer to:
(a) violate or attempt to violate the Rules of Professional Conduct, knowingly assist or induce another to do so, or do so through
the acts of another;
(b) commit a criminal or deliberately wrongful act that reflects adversely on the lawyer's honesty, trustworthiness or fitness to
practice law;
(c) engage in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation which reflects adversely on the lawyer’s fitness to
practice law;
The Courts of Justice further – GUARANTEES THE JUDGES against complaints being investigated by HAND SELECTING THE
JIRC ( The Judicial Inquiry and Review Committee where complaints are filed against Judges – and never investigated – Read More at
Guaranteeing all Judge’s the ability to ignore the law and rule to protect their own and as Judge Clark stated very clearly to his good
friend Attorney Michael Weiser
“I HAVE NO CHOICE BUT TO LET HER OUT OF JAIL, I AM SO SORRY I CANNOT COLLECT YOUR
LEGAL FEES FOR YOU”
The Appearance and the collusion is that all Judges in the State of Virginia have a Secret “Handshake” of “You Scratch my Back, I
will line you pockets with WINS in the court room for your Clients – Call me – Buy me Lunch or Dinner or what ever – but, we will not
turn on our own”
Process?
5
December 19, 2014 Letter exposed that Michael Gardner was looking for someone to hire to Murder young
girls he had molested and found guilty with DNA – yet let out of jail by Chief Justice Cynthia Kinser.
December 31, 2014 Chief Justice Cynthia Kinser with no

explanation to retire early (January 31, 2022 – expiration of her appointment) The Appeals Court of the State of Virginia had denied
Michael Gardner’s appeal / release – Chief Judge of the Supreme Court of Virginia Cynthia Kinser let him out of jail by all
appearance for the Old Boys Network, to hire a hit man to kill the young women he had molested prior to his re-trail. Cynthia Kinser will
receive her pension and perks for cooperating and doing the bidding of the Old Boys Network for all her years, and has been re-hired as
the ETHICS COUNCIL FOR THE SUPRME COURT
January 23, 2015 - The Virginia Republican Party wants the U.S. Senate to investigate whether Democratic Sen. Mark Warner violated
federal law when he discussed possible job opportunities for a former state senator’s daughter. GOP Party Chairman Pat Mullins sent a
letter Friday to the U.S. Senate Select Committee on Ethics asking it to investigate Warner. He was part of a group of Democrats that tried
unsuccessfully to prevent former state Sen. Phil Puckett from resigning last summer. Puckett’s resignation gave Republicans control of
the state Senate. Warner has acknowledged he “brainstormed” with Puckett’s son about possible job opportunities for Puckett’s daughter
but did not make any explicit job offers. Federal prosecutors indicated in December their investigation into Puckett’s resignation was
closed, they would ignore the criminal actions. That Janice has followed up with a complaint to the Ethics Committee by all appearance
along with the Judiciary are ignoring these facts, Murder / Suicides et al.
September 2015 Judge Bellows “ORDER” Denies Janice Intervene with no hearing, and Orders Clerks to take no other filings by
Janice
September 2015 Janice Intervenes in the Michael Gardner case – Michael Gardner takes a plea. The Old Boys Network cannot
afford two Murder for Hire case’s going at the same time. The question should be for all – What is the back room deal the Old Boys
Network made with Michael Gardner for the plea and his silence.
On or around October 3, 2015 we come full circle Charles Severance will be tried for the Murders of Nancy Dunning, Ron Kirby and
Ruth Ann Lodato with a police office having told Janice they had no real evidence that supports him doing it, that the City of Alexandria
was in the process of creating the needed evidence to support a conviction. That Judge Bellows who assisted Pete Scamado’s Murder /
Suicide of Chris Mackney will preside over the Charles Severance trial. That Judge Bellows understands and will disallow evidence that
may find Charles Severance innocent is without question, he has shown this in his pre-trial Orders. That Judge Bellows brings a Bias in
support of Murder / Suicide into the courtroom cannot be denied after reading “Bullied to Death”. That Judge Bellows is no different than
the Judge’s that have ruled in Bias, Retribution, Retaliation with the knowledgeable intend to ignore the law and to protect the criminal
acts of David Grenadier and Ilona Ely Grenadier Heckman are obvious in all documents and Orders filed in the courts. That Chris
Mackney, Charles Severance and Janice Wolk Grenadier and MANY OTHERS have in common is the Old Boys Network has
made it there mission to kill or ruin there lives to protect one of there owns criminal actions.
No doubt the Murderer needs to be stopped, yet the person who paid him to kill the above should be held accountable – No one will out
the Murderer for hire – because for free he will take that person out. It is the belief of Janice he does not kill if he has met you – and
talked to you – He kills anonymous only, because if he didn’t Janice believes he would have killed her by now, but, that she has met him
and he has spared her, as Mark Stuart did.
Judiciary, the Government and Elected Officials in Virginia and the District of Columbia. They believe they are above the law, and the
truth supposedly your best defense does not exist around them, that they are no more then a bunch of low life bully’s with money, and no
6
class. The leaders in this “Gang” are Judge Donald Haddock and Judge Donald Kent at least in the case of Janice Wolk Grenadier. In the
case of Chris Mackney it was Judge Bellows, who has now overlapped into Janice’s with the cover up of the hits and the trial of Charles
Severance. That the following law firms have dirty hands in collusion of these actors: Grenadier Anderson Starace Duffett and Kieser,
Keller Heckman, DiMuroGinsberg, Troutman Sanders aka Mays & Valentine, BWW Law Group aka Bierman Geesling Ward and Wood,
Parker Simon & Kokolis LLC, and other’s that are known and unknown.
http://www.loudountimes.com/index.php/news/article/region_survey_finds_virginia_second_most_corrupt_state987/ - State
Integrity Gave them an F - 47th most corrupt States - http://www.stateintegrity.org/virginia That Janice is not alone the
corruption and lack of over site or Due Process in the courts in Virginia, the Federal Courts of DC and Virginia is and are a disgrace.
Yet to date October 3, 2015 Janice has not been interviewed by the FBI in regard to the information in this article even with her many
phone calls to them – for help to protect herself and her girls.
Divorce Lawyer Ilona Grenadier Heckman in Collusion with Judge James Clark filed a lawsuit to foreclose on Janice’s home with
illegally gotten legal fees by DiMuroGinsberg and Michael Weiser. Ilona has hired Heba Carter a lawyer who went to the
We have learned the University of Richmond is where in 1987 Judge Donald Kent best friend to Judge Donald Haddock was
James Comey and Senator Tim Kaine were both adjunct Professors at the same time by all appearance at the University of
Richmond.
The lawyers did not show up in court. They did not have to file anything – Judge James Clark was on their side as stated in the
below links
June 22, 2016 Janice Circuit Court of the City of Alexandria VA - exposing the corruption - Judge James Clark states he and Carter
Land were Trustee's on all of Burke and Herbert Loans for Friendship as he did on June 8, 2016. That Judge Clark further stated no
financial compensation from Burke and Herbert band directly or indirectly. Which must mean the lawyer representing Burke & Herbert
7
from his law firm would have had to do it for free - "friendship" still illegal. Janice states this is a "Shame Hearing" - Judge Clark States
- "Not on this side" since when does Judge's take sides? https://youtu.be/Lo5U4FrvdwI
In May of 2016 learned that Judge Clark had a financial relationship - I contacted the FBI and here is the
conversation with the FBI that has ignored it: https://youtu.be/DbdcVaZkItQ
These two videos show that I spoke with Gov. Terry McAuliffe and Brian Moran and showed him my Box of evidence that - that I had
been illegally jailed and tortured https://youtu.be/kQ1hRnaxvRc https://youtu.be/JevLlGOtQBE
June 2016 Burke & Herbert Bank - Lying to me about the subpoena and that he had no idea I was to come today after I had already had
a conversation with another person there. https://youtu.be/gisnNjOgVk0
https://youtu.be/GaNI8TEzWLM and The disclosure of the City Corruption in the finances - Private School $70,000 - for
tennis courts - COA funded $400,000 for tennis courts - the City Paid $1.6 Million

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GDZ8UkJv78I Cato Question where to go for Help with Sydney Powell – Licensed to Lie - On July
25, 2014 Janice Wolk Grenadier asked "Where do you go for help when your Due Process rights as an American Citizen are violated?"
You will be shocked by the answer https://youtu.be/GDZ8UkJv78I
8
We send young men and women into harms way to fight for rights that we no longer have as American Citizens. It is very scary and until
you are involved in a Slippery Slope of the Collusion and Corruption of the Judicial System - it is difficult to understand.


Read more at:

www.VaLaw2010.blogspot.com www.Facebook.com/ProSeAmerica
www.ProSeAmerica.blogspot.com www.Facebook.com/PSA-Your State Name
@ProSeAm www.Facebook.com/jwgrenadier3
JAMJustice.org - the solution to the criminal acts E-mail ProSeAmerica@gmail.com
ProSeAmerica.net Contact Janice at: 202-368-7178
JAMJustice.org
That on Friday October 21, 2016 DOJ Joesph Guzinski stated very clearly his not investigating the criminal acts and actions was
his concern for his own life, the retaliation and retribution as well as when asked who is supervisor was he stated “The White
House” not the Department of Justice Or Loretta Lynch.
2. On October 11, 2016 - Thomas Gorman (Bankruptcy Court Trustee) was at the table and insisted with this other women - that she had
been ripped off by her lawyer - that he was going to get the DOJ - Joseph Guzinski to investigate.
4. On October 13, 2016 in court. I was 3rd on the docket, at or around 1.25 pm told I would be called by Mr. Gorman in about or
within 30 minutes
6. Then Mr. Gorman calls a women's name I unfortunately, did not pay attention to the name - will need to figure it out - DOJ - Mr.
Guzinski goes up - he doesn't want anything to do with it. Mr. Gorman fights for the women - who does not show up in court so losses
by default - but, Mr. Gorman puts on fight to have it continued - to give it time to be investigated - he fights with the Judge that she
should be heard. He believes her and he thinks she was taken advantage of.
7. I ask DOJ Mr. Guzinski to stay in the court, as I am to be heard in the next half hour. He agrees turns around to stay - Mr. Gorman
and the Judge had seen me do this and had looked me in the eye -
8. I believe one of them signaled him not to stay - after he turned around and was on his way to sit - because he then abruptly turned and
said he couldn't. I then asked if he had a card.
10. I was then left to be heard at the end. But, it wasn't just the end. The Judge took a break, it was to be 10 minutes, Thomas Gorman
went running out of the court room - I believe and the appearance was to the Judge.
11. It was about a 20-minute break and the hearing started. The hearing was held after 4 pm - after court hours so no one else could hear.
The hearing was bulling to me and the ruling by the Judge was unreasonable with no questions of substance asked of me. At the end I
stood and ask for the Judge's recusal he refused.
12. I did get Exhibits into the record that show the TRUTH and the corruption. Shows the pattern and practice and the criminal acts and
actions.
9
14. On Friday, October 14, 2016 I filed for the Judge to recuse and Thomas Gorman be removed I file Criminal Claims sheets
with back up against Judge Clark and Ilona Grenadier Heckman. I filed a Notice to be heard and was denied.
Now on Friday, October 21, I have evidence that is confusing and want to meet with him to show it to him, it is time for a
meeting and he is ignoring me. I stop by his office late in the afternoon. He YELLS at me.
That he is not going to meet with me and any information I have e-mail it to him. When I state "This is my Life" in a very calm
and professional manner he states - angry and all red faced yelling at me "NO - THIS IS ABOUT MY LIFE - ME" I was
extremely taken back. shocked - to me it was one more person saying I was a NOBODY.
When I left the office since I had not recorded it - I sat down and wrote the whole thing out, that he was more concerned about
himself and how this would outcome him then me. That he was afraid of the Retaliation and Retribution on him, then what I had
been through. That he wasn't going to help me - because he most likely at or around 50 was to afraid of loosing his pension - is
what I wrote. That he didn't give a shit about me - he was only concerned about himself and the retaliation and retribution
against him was not worth doing the right thing.
15. On Sunday night October 23, 2016 ( and now I am going to work back words with the evidence that shows the collusion of Gov.
McAuliffe and the DOJ / FBI.
16. The two articles released late on the 23rd show the collusion and the payoffs to the officials in the FBI - as everyone knows Terry
McAuliffe was the fund raiser and got Bill Clinton elected to the President. He was supposed to be 1st choice for VP. The plan was he
would run for Governor - and it was just a stepping stone - I have been loud and standing up and speaking out a problem for all of them
since 2010. That they couldn't control. As you can see in the above links
18. http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/2016/10/23/virginia-gov-terry-mcauliffe-donated-467500-to-campaign-of-wife-of-senior-fbi-
official-who-oversaw-clinton-email-probe/
VIRGINIA GOV. TERRY MCAULIFFE DONATED $467,500 TO CAMPAIGN OF WIFE OF SENIOR FBI OFFICIAL WHO
OVERSAW CLINTON EMAIL PROBE
campaign of state senate campaign of the wife of an FBI official. You say why is this a big deal? Because that senior FBI official is
Andrew McCabe who oversaw the Hillary Clinton email probe. Commie Comey’s corruption is looking much more clear these days.
The political organization of Virginia Gov. Terry McAuliffe, an influential Democrat with longstanding ties to Bill and Hillary Clinton,
gave nearly $500,000 to the election campaign of the wife of an official at the Federal Bureau of Investigation who later helped oversee
the investigation into Mrs. Clinton’s email use.
Campaign finance records show Mr. McAuliffe’s political-action committee donated $467,500 to the 2015 state Senate campaign of Dr.
Jill McCabe, who is married to Andrew McCabe, now the deputy director of the FBI.
The Virginia Democratic Party, over which Mr. McAuliffe exerts considerable control, donated an additional $207,788 worth of support
to Dr. McCabe’s campaign in the form of mailers, according to the records. That adds up to slightly more than $675,000 to her candidacy
from entities either directly under Mr. McAuliffe’s control or strongly influenced by him. The figure represents more than a third of all
the campaign funds Dr. McCabe raised in the effort.
19. In May of 2016 - Terry McAuliffe was going to be speaking in Alexandria - I decide to show up. My lucky day - the news media
for all stations was following him around like crazy. Not the sound, but, my picture as you can see in this video was everywhere - you
will notice the box and the picture. The box is the box of un-open evidence that I have and the picture is of the Mark Stuart who was
hired - under Judge Clark's direction to help him find me incompetent. When the Alexandria Police were called - I was told the
Commonwealth Attorney - Randy Sengel said they were not allowed to take any police reports from me. Same YouTube as above:
10
You tube me and Terry McAuliffe https://youtu.be/kQ1hRnaxvRc You will see in this that I am showing him my evidence and
the picture - the media according to them had deleted all the verbal conversation of me and him. This came from ABC

http://freebeacon.com/issues/doj-investigates-mcauliffe-donation-chinese-clinton-backer/ As you can see on my Facebook page
most of the links to this story are corrupt
21. BELOW is a link to the FBI one of the many conversations I have tried to have with them - I caught this one agent off guard - she
even gave her page # - but again she did not ever follow up with me - no matter how many e-mails etc - Unfortunately I was late to the
record everything Above you will see a link to the FBI for 06-08-2016 - with me very comely telling the investigator - what is
happening. I also have the e-mails showing that I sent the information in.
22. I start googling and doing outlines on all he players and learn the common ground is the University of Richmond and The University
of Richmond law School also known as TC Williams Law School. That in googling adjunct professor you learn they make between
$5,000 - $20,000. I have learned privately they make $35,000 - $50,000
25. James Comey was an Adjunct Professor, since being with the FBI speaks there regularly (Paid), has won awards from the school
which brings gifts, and then paid for commencement speech May of 2016.
o James Comey would then go on to do several interviews with the press that he had put several people in jail for far less
then the criminal actions of Hillary Clinton
o James Comey after Bill Clinton met with Loretta Lynch on the tar mac became the spokes person for stating "HRC did
nothing wrong was just sloppy" in direct conflict of what he had said in the past
The above evidence I believe shows without a doubt the corruption and the purchase of the FBI / DOJ why we can not get any help in our
cases and have nowhere to go for help
26. We also don't want to forget about the cover-up of Michael Gardner and how our Virginia Legislature and the FBI kept silent the
removal of our Supreme Court Justice Cynthia Kinser as she let him out of jail so he could hire ah Hit man to kill the girls.
27. Further in DC you don't want to forget about the removal of Judge Richard Roberts after RAPING a 16 year old Victim – the Judges
have ignored his crimes and his retired with full pay and benefits
He was closely involved in the Cover-Up of my cases in the District of Columbia Federal Court - He was retired with full benefits and we will
all pay for his fun and freedom for the rest of his life.
I fight back Standing Up and Speaking out December 2016 with the Virginia Legislature I spoke twice during the
morning prior to going to over to the Supreme Court to find an “ORDER” issued denying my Emergency Motion
to “Stay” all of Judge Clarks orders. Justice Lemons Retaliation and Retribution was swift.
Outing of the $602,000 SCAM the JIRC https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NapE1NFROYk&t=5s

Greg Harrington as you will see in this link - the retaliation and disingenuous statements by Judge Parker.
Judge Parker abused his power and it was clear. Giving the Judge's the last word is a practice to protect the lawyers on the
panel to win in his court room. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NapE1NFROYk&t=13s
11
This is the Link for June 22 2016 hearing in the City of Alexandria - Where you hear Judge James Clark state
that he is on the side of the Defendants further state that he never made a cent off of his being a Trustee for
every loan Burke & Herbert did and he was Trustee for each one. It was a shame hearing by a Judge who will go
to any length to Cover Up the criminal spree of Divorce Lawyer Ilona Grenadier Heckman. https://youtu.be/Lo5U4FrvdwI
We all must support Trump as he is supporting us in the Corruption of the Courts - Consider Intervene or a
Declaration more will be coming out in the next few days through ProSe America how to support President Donald
J. Trump and his EO in keeping Americans safe. http://www.therevolutionaryconservative.com/articles/civil-rights/2017-
02-18-pro-trump-advocates-intervene-ACLU-lawsuit.html
http://www.blogtalkradio.com/futureofourchildren/2017/03/03/fighting-back-with-host-sandra-grazzini-rucki

Law Day May 2017 the Solution https://youtu.be/bFOB33A8yaM
Right with Crime What about those Judges https://youtu.be/lYM6ULrTfM0
COA Jan 2016 https://youtu.be/IZGoo4Bov1o
Mark Warner Exposed https://youtu.be/O10opcNIqNA
COA Sept 2015 https://youtu.be/qGavoOLEcRY
COA June 2015 https://youtu.be/2qAc_YqdVUw
COA Sept 2016 https://youtu.be/7rSIZ2oTh7A
COA Oct 2016 https://youtu.be/GaNI8TEzWLM
COA Feb 2016 https://youtu.be/poQ6uHhSLXM
COA Oct 2015 https://youtu.be/cqj5DcHGS3c
COA June 2017 Murder Stuart back June 14, 2017 https://youtu.be/cqj5DcHGS3c
DOJ Hangs up on JWG June 2017 https://youtu.be/Rz28-NiXaDg
DC Police March 2017 on Seth Rich Severance https://youtu.be/TjV7kZl8q4g
May 2017 Federal Society on Comey https://youtu.be/NBXNNCrcdsI
COA Council Meeting 12-17-2016 https://youtu.be/WEMNcWjMQwY
FBI conv 10 30 2016 video 6m26s webcamera io https://youtu.be/nxuqNc75T-c
COA July 22, 2016 Court hearing video RAPE by Judge James Clark https://youtu.be/Lo5U4FrvdwI
COA June 2016 Nazi Virginia the place Terrorist's can Buy $$$$ Justice https://youtu.be/qhBZLmVynXc
Burke & Herbert Bank Lies have they acted Criminally? https://youtu.be/gisnNjOgVk0
DSCF0005 - Jailed so Senator Mark Warner could be Re-elected and https://youtu.be/rRs7cBEYAjQ
DSCF0007 - Murder of Hire in Virginia the Norm https://youtu.be/Eocg-MFj_Qs
DSCF0008 - The Mortgage Crisis - Eric Holder https://youtu.be/GjaZ6a--aRM
Copy of City of Alexandria, Virginia Council Meeting May 16, 2015 267 https://youtu.be/pRIBnUYh-4Y
DSCF0055 City of Alexandria Council Meeting June 2015 https://youtu.be/2qAc_YqdVUw
DSCF0048 City of Alexandria Council Meeting November 2015 https://youtu.be/OmJWgr_qf28
DSCF0050 City of Alexandria Council Meeting October 2015 https://youtu.be/cqj5DcHGS3c
12
Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2017 5:03 PM
To: aghdami@williamsmullen.com; kb3sd@richmond.edu; Edward Barnes
<ebarnes@barnesfamilylaw.com>; bbenos@williamsmullen.com; dboelzner@goodmanallen.com;
corey.booker@leclairryan.com; gborder@richmond.edu; claudia.brand@richmond.edu;
lbrice@courts.state.va.us; Craig Burshem <craig.burshem@dss.virginia.gov>; jburtch@richmond.edu;
harris.butler@butlerroyals.com; Sean Byrne <sbyrne@richmond.edu>; brian.cannon@richmond.edu;
claire@stonecardwell.com; ccollins@richmond.edu; ncook@richmond.edu; Austin Cosby
<jcosby@vanblk.com>; ashley.davis@allenandallen.com; mdecker@richmond.edu;
jellis3@richmond.edu; mellis@richmond.edu; astone2@richmond.edu; stephen.faraci@leclairryan.com;
lfrisina@pennstuart.com; fred@fgattorney.com; mike.gill@usdoj.gov; paul_gill@fd.org;
mgoodman@goodmanallen.com; carolyn_grady@fd.org; egriffin@oag.state.va.us;
pkatz@richmond.edu; mary.langer@richmondgov.com; mary_maguire@fd.org; Bruce Matson
<bruce.matson@leclairryan.com>; kmccaule@richmond.edu; McCauley, Jim <mccauley@vsb.org>;
lparker@williamsmullen.com; rpartin@sandsanderson.com; Jayne Pemberton
<jpembertonlaw@gmail.com>; jphillip@richmond.edu; jford@richmond.edu; briopel2@richmond.edu;
John Robinson <jvr@jvrlawpc.com>; trohman@mcguirewoods.com; stephen.romine@leclairryan.com;
mross@goodmanallen.com; rrowlett@richmond.edu; mrubin@richmond.edu; connelia.savage@owens-
minor.com; cseltzer@richmond.edu; jsanchez@richmond.edu; bshelley@richmond.edu;
bsnukals@richmond.edu; jsteele@hf-law.com; jthomas@ip-counsel.net; tracy_thorne@icloud.com;
ititley@richmond.edu; robert_wagner@fd.org; michellew2005@yahoo.com;
thomas.wolf@leclairryan.com; aalhibri@richmond.edu; Steve Allred <sallred@richmond.edu>;
rbacigal@richmond.edu; mbacigal@richmond.edu; wberryhi@richmond.edu; pbirch@richmond.edu;
cbrown5@richmond.edu; hbryson@richmond.edu; jcampbe4@richmond.edu; tcasey@richmond.edu;
dmargoli@richmond.edu; hchamber@richmond.edu; tcoggins@richmond.edu; ecollin2@richmond.edu;
ccorts@richmond.edu; ccotropi@richmond.edu; pcrane@richmond.edu; ashley.dobbs@richmond.edu;
jdougla2@richmond.edu; Joel Eisen <jeisen@richmond.edu>; depstein@richmond.edu;
jerickso@richmond.edu; bfisher@richmond.edu; afrank@richmond.edu; dfrisch@richmond.edu; Jim
Gibson <jgibson@richmond.edu>; cgiorget@richmond.edu; mharbach@richmond.edu;
rep.senate.gov>
info@altright.com; newsdesk@wjla.com; Assignment Manager <newsroom@whsv.com>
Subject: * James McCauley Ethics Guru - Had the information to prevent all the criminal acts and actions
described below against Janice Wolk Grenadier
Importance: Low
Dear Ladies and Gentlemen.
or around January 25, 2011 I had lunch in Arlington VA with
Mr. McCauley. The law and ethics are very clear. The Judiciary,
the Government and Elected Officials all police themselves are
See Attached
actions of Divorce Lawyer Ilona Ely Freedman
Grenadier Heckman my x-mother in law to his home, not to his
office. He then went on to Bully me and harass me for
expecting him to do his job that he is paid very well to do.


Suicide - instead I am standing up and speaking out while
Mr. McCauley all others look the other way as I become
homeless so Divorce Lawyer Ilona Grenadier and
Ben DiMuro can continue on there crime spree stealing money
and Real Estate from many. But, they give great donations to
the VSB et al and isn't it about the money and how much you
can steal from someone like me. How you can force me to be
homeless and or to commit Suicide - How many peoples blood
do you have on your hands for your selfish acts or actions?

dirty hands in collusion of these actors: Grenadier
Anderson Starace Duffett and Kieser,
Keller Heckman, DiMuroGinsberg, Troutman Sanders aka Mays
& Valentine, BWW Law Group aka Bierman Geesling Ward and
Wood, Parker Simon & Kokolis LLC, and other’s that are known
and unknown.


disgrace.
girls.


with illegally gotten legal fees by DiMuroGinsbergand
Michael Weiser. Ilona has hired Heba Carter a lawyer who went
to the University of Richmond.


of Richmond.
anything:
below links

These two videos show that I spoke with Gov.

Terry McAuliffe and Brian Moran and showed him my Box of
evidence that - that I had been illegally jailed and
GOtQBE






tennis courts - COAfunded $400,000 for tennis courts - the City

February 2016 - The $602,000 SCAM of
the JIRC https://youtu.be/poQ6uHhSLXM
aRM

understand.
2014/cbf
Rico Information:
Back up the RICO
Read more at:

@ProSeAm
ProSeAmerica.net

Outline FBI / DOJcorruption / Bankruptcy Cover Up and others



me in the eye -

card.
end. The Judge took a break, it was to be 10 minutes,
Thomas Gorman went running out of the court room - I believe
and the appearance was to the Judge.
refused.
denominator of all.
14. On Friday, October 14, 2016 I filed for the Judge

to recuse and Thomas Gorman be removed I file Criminal
Claims sheets with back up against Judge Clark
and IlonaGrenadier Heckman. I filed a Notice to be heard and
was denied. I take a copy to the Department of Justice as well
as other Documents to Mr. Guzinski I then e-mail other
information and request a meeting on Friday the 14th with
Mr. Guzinski of the DOJ Mr. Guzinski refuses the meeting saying
he would read everything and then get back to me. I continue
sending Mr. Guzinski information / things Now on Friday,
October 21, I have evidence that is confusing and want to meet
with him to show it to him, it is time for a meeting and he is
ignoring me. I stop by his office late in the afternoon. He YELLS
at me. That he is not going to meet with me and any
information I have e-mail it to him. When I state "This is my
Life" in a very calm and professional manner he states - angry
and all red faced yelling at me "NO - THIS IS ABOUT MY LIFE -
ME" I was extremely taken back. shocked - to me it was one
more person saying I was a NOBODY. When I left the office
since I had not recorded it - I sat down and wrote the whole
thing out, that he was more concerned about himself and how
this would outcome him then me. That he was afraid of the
Retaliation and Retribution on him, then what I had been
through. That he wasn't going to help me - because he most
likely at or around 50 was to afraid of loosing his pension - is
what I wrote. That he didn't give a shit about me - he was only
concerned about himself and the retaliation and retribution
against him was not worth doing the right thing. As you may or
may not know I reached out to everyone -

17. Clinton Ally Aided Campaign of FBI Official’s Wife

– WSJ $675,000.
corrupt as it gets. So it should be no surprise
that McAuliffe donated $467,500 to campaign of state senate
campaign of the wife of an FBI official. You say why is this a big
deal? Because that senior FBI official is Andrew McCabe who
oversaw the Hillary Clinton email probe. Commie Comey’s
corruption is looking much more clear these days. The political
organization of Virginia Gov. Terry McAuliffe, an influential
Democrat with longstanding ties to Bill and Hillary Clinton, gave
nearly $500,000 to the election campaign of the wife of an
official at the Federal Bureau of Investigation who later helped
oversee the investigation into Mrs. Clinton’s email use.
Campaign finance records show Mr. McAuliffe’s political-action
campaign of Dr. Jill McCabe, who is married to
Andrew McCabe, now the deputy director of the FBI. The
Virginia Democratic Party, over which Mr. McAuliffe exerts
considerable control, donated an additional $207,788 worth of
support to Dr. McCabe’s campaign in the form of mailers,
according to the records. That adds up to slightly more than
$675,000 to her candidacy from entities either directly under
Mr. McAuliffe’s control or strongly influenced by him. The
figure represents more than a third of all the campaign funds
Dr. McCabe raised in the effort. Mr. McAuliffe and other state
party leaders recruited Dr. McCabe to run, according to party
officials. She lost the election to incumbent Republican Dick
Black.

were called - I was told the Commonwealth Attorney -
Randy Sengel said they were not allowed to take any police
reports from me. Same YouTube as above: 11 You tube me and
Terry McAuliffe https://youtu.be/kQ1hRnaxvRc You will see in
this that I am showing him my evidence and the picture - the
media according to them had deleted all the verbal
conversation of me and him. This came from ABC

and the other video that ABC gave
me Youtube - https://youtu.be/JevLlGOtQBE


learn they make between $5,000 - $20,000. I
have learned privately they make $35,000 - $50,000

speech May of 2016.




issued denying my Emergency Motion to “Stay” all of
Judge Clarks orders. Justice Lemons Retaliation and Retribution
was swift.
Outing of the $602,000 SCAM
the JIRC https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NapE1NFROYk&t
=5s
Judge Johnston
Judge Parker for

Sally Minetree - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GvSeBt-
3WxU
Judge Appeals Court

3s 12

spree of Divorce
Lawyer Ilona Grenadier Heckman. https://youtu.be/Lo5U4Frvd
wI

more will be coming out in the next few days
through ProSe America how to support President Donald J.
Trump and his EO in keeping Americans
lawsuit.html


NiXaDg
May 2017 Federal Society
on Comey https://youtu.be/NBXNNCrcdsI
FBI conv 10 30 2016 video
6m26s webcamera io https://youtu.be/nxuqNc75T-c


Warmly,
JW Grenadier
www.JAMJustice.org
1 Corinthians 13:13

The Young Girls And
Molested who
Dr. Robert
Stood Up
Hire
Murder for Hire
1
2
3

4
Warner
these Judges
for a lawyer to:
practice law;
practice law;
turn on our own”
Process?
5

Janice
6
Richmond.
below links
7

8


Read more at:

JAMJustice.org
within 30 minutes
actions.
9
10


11

12
Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2017 9:13 AM
To: intakereb <intakereb@vsb.org>; jake.rubenstein@governor.virginia.gov; doris@cvlas.org
Subject: Complaint against Divorce Lawyer Ilona Ely Freedman Grenadier Heckman and others
Dear Chuck,
Thank you for taking the time on Monday to meet with me at

the VSB. My understanding of our meeting was that you
pointed out you are a government agency. Where others in the
VSB have stated "We can pick and choose what complaints we
look into as we don't take money from the Legislature".
As a state agency I have included in this e-mail a representative

from Gov Terry McAuliffe's office who has been designated to
help with my issues through this. Because of this I am attaching
the Exhibits in regard to Divorce Lawyer Ilona Grenadier - which
has the crimes she has committed in it, with the Criminal
Complaint that is done. The 1st one is Epson 011 - they were
split up in order for scanning purposes
EPSON011.PDF
EPSON012.PDF
EPSON013.PDF
EPSON014.PDF
EPSON015.PDF
I have sent in several complaints on the lawyers the appearance

is they are being ignored - as my updates were promised by Mr.
Davis and then when requested he just ignored the e-mails,
because of that and since I have included the president of the
VSB .
I understand from our conversation updates are not given in

person only by e-mail or letters. I would like my updates by e-
mail and to please include the Governor's office in such
updates.
I look forward to hearing from you with the list of all complaints
and the out come of them.
Warmly,
JW Grenadier
202-368-7179
www.JAMJustice.org
1 Corinthians 13:13

The Young Girls And
Molested who
Dr. Robert
Stood Up
Hire
Murder for Hire
1
2
3

4
Warner
these Judges
for a lawyer to:
practice law;
practice law;
turn on our own”
Process?
5

Janice
6
Richmond.
below links
7

8


Read more at:

JAMJustice.org
within 30 minutes
actions.
9
10


11

12
Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2017 3:13 PM
Subject: Re: Complaint against Divorce Lawyer Ilona Ely Freedman Grenadier Heckman and others
Dear Chuck,
When we spoke the other day - I understood that you would

have an answer for me at the time I e-mailed you. Please
advice on timing
Thank you,
JW Grenadier
www.JAMJustice.org
1 Corinthians 13:13
On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 9:13 AM, JW Grenadier <jwgrenadier@gmail.com> wrote:

Dear Chuck,

EPSON011.PDFError! Filename not specified.


VSB .

updates.
Warmly,
JW Grenadier
202-368-7179
www.JAMJustice.org
1 Corinthians 13:13
Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2017 3:13 PM
Subject: Re: Complaint against Divorce Lawyer Ilona Ely Freedman Grenadier Heckman and others
Dear Chuck,
When we spoke the other day - I understood that you would

have an answer for me at the time I e-mailed you. Please
advice on timing
Thank you,
JW Grenadier
www.JAMJustice.org
1 Corinthians 13:13
On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 9:13 AM, JW Grenadier <jwgrenadier@gmail.com> wrote:

Dear Chuck,



VSB .

updates.
Warmly,
JW Grenadier
202-368-7179
www.JAMJustice.org
1 Corinthians 13:13
Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2017 9:47 AM
To: doris@cvlas.org; jake.rubenstein@governor.virginia.gov; Simon, Noah
<Noah.Simon@mail.house.gov>; Abby Moynihan <amoynihan@mwc-law.com>; mcantrell@mwc-
law.com; mcohen@mwc-law.com; MCohen2@mwc-law.com; Marc Weisberg <mweisberg@mwc-
law.com>; Mary Felch <mfelch@dls.virginia.gov>; homeowner.help@ocwen.com; rma@ocwen.com;
Aging Contact (Aging) <contact_aging@aging.senate.gov>; McCarroll, Kate (Kaine)
<kate_McCarroll@kaine.senate.gov>; Reza, S. Mohsin <mohsin.reza@troutmansanders.com>;
claims@alpsnet.com; John Ries <jries@alpsnet.com>; John Arundel <jonarundel@aol.com>;
Robert.Michael@bww-law.com; Howie Bierman <howie.bierman@bww-law.com>; Zinsner, Mary C.
<mary.zinsner@troutmansanders.com>; Lee, N. Patrick <plee@mcguirewoods.com>; Perle, Scott I.
<SPerle@mcguirewoods.com>; aswartz@mwc-law.com; msposato@mwc-law.com; hspivak@mwc-
law.com; cgraham@mwc-law.com; Janet Charlton <jcharlton@mwc-law.com>; Laura H.G. O'Sullivan
<losullivan@mwc-law.com>; Margaret Gairo <mgairo@mwc-law.com>; tMcCabe@mwc-law.com;
econway@mwc-law.com; Relationship Manager <relationshipmanager@ocwen.com>; twelsh@mwc-
law.com
<James.Banks@alexandriava.gov>; Whistleblower (Judiciary-Rep) <whistleblower@judiciary-
<washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>; NOVAPC <novapc@ic.fbi.gov>; McCauley, Jim <mccauley@vsb.org>;
mherring@oag.state.va.us; Serrano, Margeaux S. <mserrano@oag.state.va.us>; Cc: Mark Levine
<mark@radioinsidescoop.com>; Dave Albo <dave@davealbo.com>; DelLAdams@house.virginia.gov;
DelLAird@house.virginia.gov; DelDAlbo@house.virginia.gov; DelRAnderson@house.virginia.gov;
DelTAustin@house.virginia.gov; DelLBagby@house.virginia.gov; DelJBell@house.virginia.gov;
DelDBell@house.virginia.gov; DelRBell@house.virginia.gov; DelRBloxom@house.virginia.gov;
deljbourne@house.virginia.gov; DelJBoysko@house.virginia.gov; DelDBulova@house.virginia.gov;
DelKByron@house.virginia.gov; DelJCampbell@house.virginia.gov; DelBCarr@house.virginia.gov;
DelBCline@house.virginia.gov; DelMCole@house.virginia.gov; DelCCollins@house.virginia.gov;
DelKCox@house.virginia.gov; DelGDavis@house.virginia.gov; DelMDudenhefer@house.virginia.gov;
<jackmant@washpost.com>; The Washington Times <member@washingtontimesemail.com>; Noah
Bookbinder <info@citizensforethics.org>; Response Action Network <info@responseaction.com>;
info@altright.com; newsdesk@wjla.com; Assignment Manager <newsroom@whsv.com>; Randy
Shulman <editor@metroweekly.com>; editor@washintonexaminer.com;
gazette@connectionnewspapers.com; editor@valawyersmedia.com; Adam Prather
<aprather@thehill.com>; Arlington Editor <arlingtonnews@gmail.com>; John Chapman
<john.taylor.chapman@alexandriava.gov>; maureensm@ffww.com; cochs@ap.org;
rvizcon@telemundo.com; evaldez@univision.net; tom.lea@nbc.com; mimi.gurbst@abc.com;
diefenbach@foxnews.com; stella.dawson@reuters.com; jcohen@bloomberg.net;
brian_hill@metronetworks.com; mark.nelson@abc.com; virginia.moseley@abc.com;
ftn@cbsnews.com; betsy.fischer@nbc.com; dibella@foxnews.com; dmedrano@telemundo.com;
plorris@univision.net; abenitez@univision.net; steve.majors@nbc.com; mcurtis@njn.org;
meredith.white@abc.com; gil.pimentel@abc.com; stu.schutzman@abc.com;
thismorning@cbsnews.com; sundays@cbsnews.com; 48hours@cbsnews.com;
jonathan.wald@nbc.com; penny.britell@abc.com; Muriel Pearson <muriel.pearson@abc.com>;
dij@cbsnews.com; sharon.newman@abc.com; realitycheck@cbsnews.com; lisa.hsia@nbc.com;
mail@uttm.com; susan.dutcher@nbc.com; rod.prince@nbc.com; pjh@cbsnews.com;
browne@foxnews.com; gramshaw@newshour.org; pls@cbsnews.com; dtalbot@salon.com;
modonnell@salon.com; kamiya@salon.com; scottr@salon.com; lauram@salon.com; Ruth Henrich
<ruth@salon.com>; kaufman@salon.com; bwyman@salon.com; jstark@salon.com;
jmillman@salon.com; boehlert@salon.com; szacharek@salon.com; jsweeney@salon.com;
abenfer@salon.com; ayork@salon.com; fmorgan@salon.com; dawn@salon.com;
klauerman@salon.com; jtapper@salon.com; daryl@salon.com; amontgomery@salon.com;
dcruickshank@salon.com; cchocano@salon.com; ccolin@salon.com; areiter@salon.com;
letters@rollingstone.com; letters@timesdispatch.com; letters@nytimes.com; SUNTIMES
<letters@suntimes.com>; letters@newsweek.com; Imus@msnbc.com; AbramsReport@msnbc.com;
Hardball@msnbc.com; TheNews@msnbc.com; Banfield@msnbc.com; Nachman@msnbc.com;
MSNBCInvestigates@msnbc.com; Headliners@msnbc.com; Today@nbc.com; weekendtoday@nbc.com;
Nightly@nbc.com; Dateline@nbc.com; MTP@nbc.com; letters@msnbc.com; World@msnbc.com;
WebEditors@newsweek.com; Editors@newsweek.com; dave.berg@nbc.com;
chouinard@incorrect.com; janesang@aol.com; rkendler@biznet-news.com;
christian.hudson@turner.com; gail.evans@turner.com; tina.cowles@cnn.com; jason.cahill@turner.com;
jamie.allen@turner.com; lori.blackman@turner.com; laura.molta@turner.com; molly.young@cbn.org;
nate.fredman@foxnews.com; zorich@foxnews.com; striegel@foxnews.com;
gregg.cockrell@msnbc.com; hitalie@ap.org; dbauder@ap.org; kschwartz@ap.org; ddivis@upi.com;
lborden@gns.gannett.com; craasch@gns.gannett.com; Peggy Fox <pfox@wusa9.com>;
hannity@foxnews.com; pnn@pacifica.org; VSPBCI@vsp.virginia.gov; BCIGID7@vsp.virginia.gov;
cynthia.jones@vsp.virginia.gov; VSPDiv7@vsp.virginia.gov; JP.Koushel@vsp.virginia.gov;
Paul.Savel@vsp.virginia.gov; James.DeFord@vsp.virginia.gov; Judge_Kenney@vaeb.uscourts.gov
Subject: * Re: The Virginia JIRC - the $602,000 SCAM just got BIGGER - Does the VSB have any authority
over Judges that have law licenses - THE CITIZENS OF VIRGINIA DESERVE JUSTICE
Importance: Low
Hello,
The press won’t do our stories. So I have started a new website for us to self-publish our stores
www.AmLegalNews.com
Other Social Media:
Google Blog: American Legal News https://amlegalnews.blogspot.com/
FaceBook: American Legal @AmLegalNews

https://www.facebook.com/AmLegalNews
Twitter: @AmLegalNews https://twitter.com/AmLegalNews
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/amlegalnews/
I am looking for reporters to volunteer to write others stories and for donations to hire reporters
to tell stories.
We must have our stories told by others.

I have attached a sheet for you to copy paste or fill out and send back to me to get your story
told. Please do not just write a part of it in an e-mail. I need these back so I can forward to
reporters as we can afford them or as we have volunteers -
All our stories need to be told by someone else -
Friend us on Facebook, Follow us on Twitter and more important share the information
Thank you
Warmly,
jw
We need to get a list of people with each of these lawyers and lenders and others -
JW Grenadier
www.JAMJustice.org
1 Corinthians 13:13
On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 12:30 PM, JW Grenadier <jwgrenadier@gmail.com> wrote:

Dear Ms. Doris Causey
Congratulations I understand you have now taken over as President of the Virginia
State Bar. In past and in this e-mail I have exposed the ignoring of the Criminal Acts
and Actions of some of the most powerful law firms in the State of Virginia and across
the United States of America, these criminal acts and actions were done maliciously
and with knowledgeable intend with the knowledge that those in Power had there back.
Please find those e-mails (copies) attached.
Ms. Causey, I am not sure if you are aware of or I have mentioned to you, but, being the
x-wife of the son of a Judge (the late Judge Albert Grenadier of the City of Alexandria) I
have the unique knowledge and have seen Judges outcomes purchased for SEX,
breakfast, lunch, dinner and a weekend getaway, with Judge James Clark he states he
sells himself for "friendship". Judges should not be for SALE to lawyers.
The question is are you going to go along and get along or do the right thing by law for
the people of the State of Virginia.
The JIRC which in this Video I exposed the $602,000 SCAM testifying in front of the
Virginia Legislature Courts of Justice (all lawyers). These Judges all across Virginia are
past lawyers and my understanding and if I am wrong please let me know but, still hold
law licenses and come under the Professional Code of Ethics. This would include
lawyers working with the VSB and especially those working at the JIRC. The Oath of
Office is clear the law is clear when a Lawyer or Judge acts in conflict of the law, the
Virginia Constitution, the US Constitution, their Oath of Office, the Judicial Canons or
the Professional Code of Ethics they are to report and the VSB and JIRC are to hold
them accountable and decide the correct punishment or remove them from there
duties to protect the public.
The $602,000 SCAM of the JIRC I exposed on December 2, 2016 to the Virginia
Legislature for them to only further the COVER UP. I have attached the 2015 Report to
the Legislature and the 2016 report and you can see it is more Vague and does not
have any transparency for the Public as to what is really going on.
You can read more about this and see the Statistics for the last 15 years -
that format and the way of reporting has now changed to help COVER UP
for Judges and Lawyers. http://proseamerica.blogspot.com/2016/02/ You
can read on line or I have attached it.
I feel the whole system of the Judiciary the Government and the Elected
Officials goals are to line each others pockets and "FUCK" the citizens. I
apologize for using such a harsh word but, the truth is harsh. This reflects
on OAG Mark Herring it is his job to insure Justice for all Citizens of the
State of Virginia while protecting the employees of Virginia. Most people
misunderstand the job of the OAG as it is double sworded.
I filed on July 10, 2017 complaints again on Judge Clark, Judge Postin and
Chief Justice Donald Lemons for the collusion and corruption to deny me
any Justice against Divorce Lawyer Ilona Ely Freedman Grenadier
Heckman - I did this to protect the rest of Virginia. The letter I received on
July 15, 2017 shows they did not investigate as they have none of my
complaints. This letter is a form letter that goes out to all citizens who
report and ask for help.
I was very clear in my complaints I was not asking for a change in the
outcome of my case but, to stop the criminal activity in our courts and that a
citizen in Virginia can get justice.
I ask that you get back to me, on how through within the VSB I can
complain about the Professional Code of Ethics that not only the Judges,
but the lawyers that work for the JIRC, for the VSB are acting in collusion to
ignore the criminal acts and actions and working to COVER UP the criminal
Acts of Divorce Lawyer Ilona Grenadier Heckman and her law firm.
I look forward to hearing back from you on not only cleaning up the VSB
and Alps Insurance but also the JIRC and protecting the Virginia Citizens
from corrupt Courts / Judges et al
I also ask that you do your job as President of the Virginia State Bar (VSB)
and not look the other way. That you Stand Up and demand Equal Justice
for all and those that have ignored there duties you STAND UP and SPEAK
OUT about how Powerful law firms have bribed there way out of complaints
being heard and how the JIRC has empowered Judges to ignore the law,
the Virginia Constitution and the United States Constitution.
Attached:
Recent past E-Mails to Doris and John Ries
JIRC 2015 and 2016 reports to Virginia Legislature
JIRC Post on ProSeAmerica.Blogspot.com
Letter from JIRC on 3 complaints sent 1 day after receipt of Complaints
Other information on the JIRC to show it is going in a direction of COVER UP
Warmly,
JW Grenadier
www.JAMJustice.org
1 Corinthians 13:13
American Legal

Looking to tell your story:

Name
Address

Phone Number
E-mail

Please Share:

● Who was involved?
● What happened?
● When did it take place?
● Where did it take place?
● Why did that happen?
● How did it happen?

Your Social Media:
Facebook
Blog
Twitter
Instagram

We will get back with you when we have someone to write your story.

You will be able to read it at www.AmLegalNews.com
Google Blog: American Legal News https://amlegalnews.blogspot.com/
FaceBook: American Legal @AmLegalNews https://www.facebook.com/AmLegalNews
Twitter: @AmLegalNews https://twitter.com/AmLegalNews
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/amlegalnews/

Sent: Tuesday, October 3, 2017 3:12 PM
To: Abby Moynihan <amoynihan@mwc-law.com>; Marc Weisberg <mweisberg@mwc-law.com>;
mcantrell@mwc-law.com; rma@ocwen.com; Relationship Manager
<relationshipmanager@ocwen.com>; homeowner.help@ocwen.com; Robert.Michael@bww-law.com;
Howie Bierman <howie.bierman@bww-law.com>; Reza, S. Mohsin
<mohsin.reza@troutmansanders.com>; Zinsner, Mary C. <mary.zinsner@troutmansanders.com>;
claims@alpsnet.com; John Ries <jries@alpsnet.com>; jake.rubenstein@governor.virginia.gov;
stephen.lewis@troutmansanders.com; joseph.a.guzinski@usdoj.gov; Whistleblower (Judiciary-Rep)
<whistleblower@judiciary-rep.senate.gov>; Wilson, Marcus H. (WF) (FBI) <marcus.wilson@ic.fbi.gov>;
Washington Field FBI Email <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>; NOVAPC <novapc@ic.fbi.gov>;
aswartz@mwc-law.com; msposato@mwc-law.com; hspivak@mwc-law.com; cgraham@mwc-law.com;
mcohen@mwc-law.com; Janet Charlton <jcharlton@mwc-law.com>; Laura H.G. O'Sullivan
<losullivan@mwc-law.com>; Margaret Gairo <mgairo@mwc-law.com>; tMcCabe@mwc-law.com;
econway@mwc-law.com; Brian.Moran@governor.va.gov; Perle, Scott I. <SPerle@mcguirewoods.com>;
Jackson, Wykema C. (OAG) (JMD) <Wykema.C.Jackson2@usdoj.gov>; ACLU of Virginia
<acluva@acluva.org>; anthony.cammarata@flofr.com; Full Measure with Sharyl Attkisson
<fullmeasurenews@gmail.com>; atur.desai@cfpb.com; citizenservices@myfloridalegal.com;
doris@cvlas.org; ffetf@usdoj.gov; intakereb <intakereb@vsb.org>; homeland.security@mail.house.gov;
jan.singelmann@cfpb.gov; jean.healey@cfpb.gov; jennifer.pinder@myfloridalegal.com;
jkloch@juridicalsolutions.com; jmcgrath@juridicalsolutions.com
Subject: Filed today
EPSON003.PDF
EPSON004.PDF
EPSON005.PDF
Any questions - Please feel free to contact me.
Thank you
Warmly,
JW Grenadier
www.JAMJustice.org
1 Corinthians 13:13
Sent: Wednesday, October 4, 2017 8:46 AM
To: Irvin, David <dirvin@oag.state.va.us>; Sutherlin, Kaci C. <ksutherlin@oag.state.va.us>; Reza, S.
Mohsin <mohsin.reza@troutmansanders.com>; steve.lewis@troutman.com; rma@ocwen.com;
homeowner.help@ocwen.com; Abby Moynihan <amoynihan@mwc-law.com>; mcantrell@mwc-
law.com; mchoen2@mwc-law.com; cgraham@mwc-law.com; Janet Charlton <jcharlton@mwc-
law.com>; econway@mwc-law.com; ffetf@usdoj.gov; Margaret Gairo <mgairo@mwc-law.com>; Laura
H.G. O'Sullivan <losullivan@mwc-law.com>; Jackson, Wykema C. (OAG) (JMD)
<Wykema.C.Jackson2@usdoj.gov>; Travis Salisbury <tsalisbury@mwc-law.com>; Perle, Scott I.
<SPerle@mcguirewoods.com>; Robert.Michael@bww-law.com; Zinsner, Mary C.
<mary.zinsner@troutmansanders.com>; twelsh@mwc-law.com; tMcCabe@mwc-law.com; ACLU of
Virginia <acluva@acluva.org>; Marc Weisberg <mweisberg@mwc-law.com>; Relationship Manager
<relationshipmanager@ocwen.com>; aswartz@mwc-law.com; atur.desai@cfpb.com;
jkloch@juridicalsolutions.com; claims@alpsnet.com; doris@cvlas.org; hspivak@mwc-law.com;
intakereb <intakereb@vsb.org>; John Ries <jries@alpsnet.com>; Ben Lane <blane@housingwire.com>;
Lee, N. Patrick <plee@mcguirewoods.com>
Subject: Illegal and Fraudulant Foreclosure scheduled for October 5, 2017
Good Morning All,
Since 2012 I have been requesting information on the alleged

loan at 15 W. Spring Street. Everyone has ignored those
requests.
But, yesterday at the end of the day I received from Troutman

Sanders again a bunch of Bull Shit, but there were 3 documents
I had never seen before that are called Allonge to Note. Those
three documents helped me to realize the 3 Loan Numbers and
that at least one of those Allonge was manufactured and Dated
two days prior to the actual settlement.
I could tell by the loan being in 2 different Security Portfolios

that it had to be on at least 2 if not 3 Balance sheets of Banks at
the same time. I believe now I can prove that with these
numbers and the manufactured documents
I can't personally stop the Foreclosure - but, I will re-open all
cases with new evidence that shows FRAUD after FRAUD after
FRAUD
I am asking you to postpone the Foreclosure as you have not

provided the requested information, but to further stop the
Foreclosure due to the manufactured documents and the fact
there is no owner to this loan. Bank of America and Wells
Fargo have walked away from it. OCWEN is a Server that has
no rights to foreclose as it has no employer.
That it is a very interesting Scheme and Artifice that OCWEN

and the lawyers have created.
I look forward to hearing back from you.
Warmly,
JW Grenadier
202-368-7178

1 Corinthians 13:13
15 W. Spring St.
202-368-7178
jw grenadier@gmail.com
October 3, 2017
Syed Moshin Reza

Troutman Sanders
1850 Towers Crescent Plaza , Suite 500
Tysons Corner, Virginia 22182
OCWEN Loan Servicing

PO Box 659826
San Antonio TX 78265-9126
McCabe Weisberg & Conway LLC

722 East Market Street Suite 203
Leesburg, VA 20176
Surety Trustees
aka McCabe Weisberg & Conway LLC
722 East Market Street Suite 203
Leesburg, VA 20176
Attorney General Mark Herring

℅ Kaci Sutherlin
℅ David Irvin
Office of the Attorney General
202 North 9th Street
Richmond, Virginia 23219
(804) 786-2115 Office
ksutherlin@oag.state.va.us
http://www.ag.virginia.gov
RE: Wells Fargo Bank, Bank of America, Surety Trustees, McCabe Weisberg & Conway LLP and
OCWEN as Servicer HAVE NO STANDING TO FORECLOSE ON 15 W. Spring Street and if they do - will
have created an illegal and Fraudulent Foreclosure for personal profit. - The FACTS and the
DOCUMENTS do not show that anyone has STANDING to foreclose on October 5, 2017. That the alleged
Loan has three different Loan Numbers: Exhibit 1: The National Mtg Settlement of 2012 with Bank of
America Loan No. 0015847247 Exhibit 9: Fraudulent - Allonge to Note dated Feb 2, 2005 - 2 days prior to
actual settlement of Feb 4, 2005 Wells Fargo Bank stamped on it Loan No. 691002604. Exhibit 10: Allonge
to Note OCWEN signing as Attorney in Fact for Wells Fargo Bank Loan No. 7143312465
Dear Moshin,
Wells Fargo Bank, Bank of America and OCWEN as Servicer HAVE NO STANDING TO
FORECLOSE ON 15 W. Spring Street and if they do - Troutman Sanders aka Mays & Valentine (who
1
SWINDLED $30,000. From Janice Wolk Grenadier in 1990 to COVER UP the monies stolen out of the Sonia
Grenadier Trust by Ilona Grenadier Heckman) will have perpetuated the illegal and Fraudulent Foreclosure with
the knowledgeable and help of McCabe Weisberg & Conway whose Lawyer Abby Moynihan (who by all
appearance worked for either Ilona Grenadier or her attorney Ben DiMuro / DiMuroGinsberg she refuses to
answer which one) and the Attorney General Mark Herring
Further you by all appearance waited to two days prior to the foreclosure to give little time to contest and show
the FRAUD you and the other lawyers are committing. That you ignored all requested documentation since
2012 is in violation of the FDCPA.
Let me make it very clear: The documentation Troutman Sanders provided for OCWEN was lacking in
what was requested, and the documentation you did provide showed fraudulent, false and misleading
representation, and did not validate the alleged debt or Ownership of the alleged debt.
You state I am confusing one situation with the other - the law and the Professional Code of Ethics is clear on
conflict of interest:
The law is clear when collecting a debt you must without a shadow of doubt show who is the owner of
such debt. - You can not do this - the documentation and the Statements from Wells Fargo Bank and Bank of
America to Janice and the CFPB are in direct conflict of what was presented in court and what they Claim.
● BOTH WELLS FARGO BANK and BANK of AMERICA claim no interest

● OCWEN is a servicer not a Owner must show who the Owner is and can’t because there are too
many conflicting document’s filed against the home and letters sent by lawyers that state otherwise.
This can not be shown to Janice because of all the made up and fraudulent documents that have been
created: As Janice has shown time and time again to be ignored by all That the law and the Constitution is
clear, and Congress made it even clearer that you can not take a person's property without clear and concise
rights also per the FDCPA Laws & Guidelines of the FDCPA.
Fair Debt Collection Practices Act - As amended by Public Law 111-203,

title X, 124 Stat. 2092 (2010)
As a public service, the staff of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has prepared the following complete text of the Fair
Debt Collection Practices Act
§§ 1692-1692p.
Please note that the format of the text differs in minor ways from the U.S. Code and West’s U.S. Code Annotated. For
example, this version uses FDCPA section numbers in the headings. In addition, the relevant U.S. Code citation is
included with each section heading. Although the staff has made every effort to transcribe the statutory material
accurately, this compendium is intended as a convenience for the public and not a substitute for the text in the U.S. Code.
Table of Contents
§801. Short title
§802. Congressional findings and declaration of purpose
2
§803. Definitions
§804. Acquisition of location information
§805. Communication in connection with debt collection
§806. Harassment or abuse § 1692d - Harassment or abuse
§807. False or misleading representations § 1692e - False or misleading representations
§808. Unfair practices § 1692f - Unfair practices
§809. Validation of debts § 1692g - Validation of debts

§810. Multiple debts
§811. Legal actions by debt collectors § 1692i - Legal actions by debt collectors
§812. Furnishing certain deceptive forms § 1692j - Furnishing certain deceptive forms
§813. Civil liability § 1692k - Civil liability
§814. Administrative enforcement § 1692l - Administrative enforcement
§815. Reports to Congress by the Bureau; views of other Federal agencies § 1692m - Reports to Congress
by the Bureau; views of other Federal agencies
§816. Relation to State laws § 1692n - Relation to State laws

§817. Exemption for State regulation
§818. Exception for certain bad check enforcement programs operated by private entities
§819. Effective date
That all of the above and others have violated the rights of Janice Wolk Grenadier under the FDCPA
NO DIFFERENT than what Troutman Sanders sent to Janice On October 2, 2017 in hopes of defrauding the
Attorney General's Office who also requested such documentation. that the documents were sent LATE on
October 2, 2017 after being requested since 2012 several times. That the documents sent were lacking in
what was requested by Janice to show that OCWEN had standing.
The 3 new documents sent that Janice does not recall having seen further show a FRAUD. These are under
Exhibit C - behind the Adjustable Rate Note Called Note Allonge
1. Allonge to Note Shows Pay to the Order of Option One Mortgage for Note dated February 4, 2005 if you
look at the Copy of the Note this is the date it was allegedly signed
2. The Next one the Allonge to Note - Dated February 2, 2005 - with the stamp Wells Fargo Bank -
stating the Note Date was February 2, 2005 - THIS is on FACE VALUE a FRAUDULENT document.
The Date of the Note and the Date of the Document show it being signed two days prior to the alleged
loan being signed by the borrow who as a refinance had a period of right of rescission under RESPA
would have caused such document and resale to be much later than the day of signing. .This document
according to the dates was done two days prior to the alleged settlement and other documents as late as
December 2012 state that Bank of America is the alleged owner of such note. That further a later dated
3
Allonge was attached as shown in 1. Which would override this Allonge. NULL and VOIDING this which
shows or on FACE VALUE is trying to show Wells Fargo Bank. This shows misleading and fraudulent
documents starting two days prior to any settlement. Or § 1692e - False or misleading
representations
3. Allonge to Note - signed as ATTORNEY IN FACT (An attorney in fact is a person who is authorized to
perform business-related transactions on behalf of someone else (the principal). In order to become
someone's attorney in fact, a person must have the principal sign a power of attorney document.)
Darryl Millet signed for OCWEN as attorney in fact. His title at OCWEN apparently according to his
Linkedin Profile Servicing Operations Specialist at Ocwen Financial Corporation - according to
Glassdoor this is a $30, 000 - $34, 000 a year job. Just as Wells Fargo stated they did not give Evette
Morales Power of Attorney to allow Surety Trustee to sell 15 W. Spring Street - I feel comfortable in
assuming Wells Fargo did not give Darryl Millet a Power of Attorney to give OCWEN ownership of such
loan
The big QUESTION here is does OCWEN - SURETY TRUSTEES aka McCABE WEISBERG & CONWAY
have standing to Foreclose on 15 W. Spring St , Alexandria Virginia 22301 and the answer is “NO” that to do
so with ignoring the request to prove the right from more than copied documents and Fraudulent documents
violates Janice’s rights as a property owner protected by the Virginia and the United States Constitution along
with Federal Law.
You can show there was a settlement / a refinance
You can show a bunch of xeroxed copies of documents that Janice had filed in the courts - in bankruptcy
But, because of the Fraudulent documents that have been filed against the house - that have been mailed to
Janice and the misleading statements, letters et al by BWW Law Group, Equity Trustees, McCabe Weisberg &
Conway, Surety Title (and ignoring the request for the copy of the power of attorney given to Evett Morales of
OCWEN to sign as attorney in fact for Wells Fargo) and now Troutman Sanders with the Allonge to Note
Fraudulent dates.
Further since 2012 Janice has sent a very specific letter requesting the information and detailed
information on all monies on this loan that was received through insurance, HAMP programs et al. This 7 page
detailed request has been ignored by OCWEN, Hunoval, BWW Law Group, Equity Trustees, McCabe Weisberg
& Conway, Surety Title and now Troutman Sanders as all of Janice’s rights have been. This letter has been
ignored by all
Why has it been ignored.

1. Because Janice can’t afford a lawyer
2. Because Janice has been Blackballed by the Old Boys Network
3. Because Janice is considered “TRASH” by the STATE and FEDERAL JUDGES, the Virginia Judiciary,
the Government and the Elected Officials for outing the COVER UP of the Criminal Spree of one of their
own Divorce Lawyer Ilona Grenadier Heckman
4. Because the Virginia Bar is paid to protect lawyers - who make a lot of money and donate dinners et al
5. Because the Virginia Courts of Justice is a bunch of lawyers who practice in front of the Judges and are
guaranteed to win as long as they stay silent about the corruption
6. Because Troutman Sanders gave $2, 533, 857 in political donations according to VPAP.org to insure that
they are not held to the law?
4
That OCWEN has dirty hands, as does Mohsin Reza who will by all appearance state anything, but has a
powerful law firm backing him. That thinks by xeroxing and creating documents that he can show and COVER
UP that OCWEN has no STANDING - OCWEN can not show an Employer of an alleged note which it must do
by the BASIC Consumer Protection Laws.
They can show a loan was taken, but, the law is clear they have 4 - 5 years to collect on such note from the last
payment - which was according to OCWEN November 2, 2008.
That in December of 2012 I received a letter from BWW Law Group a mandated letter from the Section IV
D.6 of the National Mortgage Settlement that my alleged loan was involved in this settlement and there
were other options for me than Foreclosure. Exhibit 1
When I responded to this letter the Slippery Slope of Cover Up for Bank of America - Wells Fargo - BWW Law
Group at that time Homeward Residential Inc aka The American Home Mortgage now OCWEN would begin.
With this letter and the disingenuous answers I got from BWW Law Group, Bank of America, Wells Fargo and
AHM started the investigation into what was going on and what I found was one FRAUD after another and
complete disregard to any RIGHTS under the FDCPA
That while I was illegally Jailed and Tortured from October 22, 2014 - November 12, 2014 where I was held in
solitary Confinement for 14 days - 5 pm on Election day - with the hopes that I would get out of jail and commit
suicide to prevent all TRUTHS from and collusion of many to be exposed. Why is this important because I had
to ask for the one hearing that might have been an open court hearing requested by Troutman Sanders as the
Jail was denying me access to getting to court for the hearing. My not showing up at that hearing would have
meant most likely an automatic default. I had to ask for a new date. Instead Judge Brinkema a friend of Divorce
Lawyer Ilona Grenadier Heckman and who had lost 60% of her portfolio in the Mortgage debacle ignored Janice
request for a Jury Trial and acted as Judge, Jury and Executioner in the case from her Chambers. Creating a
fiction that Janice was a piece of Trash who just didn’t want to pay her loan which was a fictitious and erroneous
Fact. Judge Brinkema by her Orders et al ruled against the law. That Howard Bierman and BWW Law Group
did not answer the Complaint and after giving them an extra 3 weeks Janice filed for a default judgement. Judge
Brinkema instead put the default on Janice the Plaintiff. The Question no one can answer is how does a
Plaintiff DEFAULT on their own COMPLAINT.
The Judiciary, the Government and Elected Officials police themselves and are required by law to be self
reporting - instead they have created a smoke and mirrors of having each others back and ignoring the law.
I was jailed for $8,100 I didn’t have for illegally gotten legal fees by Divorce lawyer Ilona Grenadier Heckman. In
America we are not supposed to have debtors prison, But, there were other issues that I needed to be silenced
for - like the fact Divorce Lawyer Ilona Grenadier’s Criminal spree that started in or around November 1983
where a Trust Agreement was forged and she would steal MILLIONS from Sonai Grenadier - then with
knowledgeable malicious intent steal over $20 Million in Real Estate and monies from Janice Wolk Grenadier
when she was divorced in June of 2000 without a property settlement agreement. Ilona did it with a Fraudulent
Liquidation Agreement done for a Virginia Partnership that held all Virginia properties - done by a lawyer not
licensed in Virginia and a Virginia Lawyer found it be “VOID” have no standing.
5
That Moshin Reza well try and state that has no bearing on this - but, it does it shows the lengths the lawyers
and Judges will go to COVER UP for one of there own.
1. BWW Law Group aka Equity Trustees: It can be shown owed a favor to Ben DiMuro - Divorce Lawyer
Ilona Grenadier Heckman and even when OCWEN stated you can not foreclose in February of 2013
stated very clearly that Equity Trustees owned the loan and they were going to foreclose no matter what
This video says a lot: JWG Spring St Feb 2013 2 BWW Law Group https://youtu.be/NePveOTCupE
2. The Allonge stated above shows the misleading and Fraudulent Document that the loan was never owned
by Wells Fargo as Wells Fargo has stated to the CFPB and Janice -
emily wells fargo 8 10 2017 video 27m50s webcamera io Wells Fargo https://youtu.be/ol0n-EDveLk
3. That Bank of America has always stated that they had no Ownership in any alleged loan even though the
Letter dated December 2012 states it was part of a National Settlement that Wells Fargo was not party to. That
Bank of America or the SEC or whomever had stated that 15 W. Spring St. , Alexandria VA 22301 was a party to
such settlement.
That the Documents filed in the City of Alexandria Virginia are riddled with Robo Signers aka Forgeries and
show the Loan in a 2003 Structured Trust which had a cutoff of July 2003. Exhibits 2 - 6
But, the foreclosure ignores this and states the alleged loan owned by Wells Fargo is in a 2005 Structured Trust.
There is no documentation that has ever been presented how it can be in both or if it is in either.
But, with this foreclosure Wells Fargo has now stated we don’t have anything to do with this foreclosure - again
misleading and false representations and we do not know for sure by whom.
Janice asks this Foreclosure to be postponed till all documents requested since 2012 be forthcoming as
required by law.
That the Virginia Attorney General’s office request to postpone be taken seriously.
That it should be noted the Consent Order that OCWEN agreed to in order to prevent criminal charges against its
employees has been rescinded by all appearance as a New case in West Palm Beach Florida has been filed by
the CFPB.
That Florida OAG Pam Bondi has filed their own case against OCWEN with criminal and civil charges.
That the little evidence Janice has been able to put together with no real discovery supports that a new
SCHEME and ARTIFICE to foreclose on innocent homeowners has been created by OCWEN and there lawyers
Troutman Sanders, McCabe Weisberg & Conway LLP aka Surety Trustees.
That with the new evidence supplied by Troutman Sanders lawyers for Wells Fargo in Federal Court and
OCWEN of False and Misleading Allonge Notes that are dated prior to the organization of the alleged loan -
creates new evidence for reopening of a lawsuit. Along with the new knowledge Troutman Sanders created a
Fraud on the Court in the BWW Law Group case in it’s representation of Wells Fargo Bank.
6
Again Janice asks this Foreclosure to be postponed till all documents requested since 2012 be
forthcoming as required by law, and or settle the situation.
Warmly,
Sent by email due to lack of time for USPS mail.
Exhibits Attached
Exhibit No. Description No. of Pages
1 Letter BWW Law Group to Janice that the alleged loan is involved in a 1
National Mortgage Settlement. This settlement did not include Wells
Fargo. The letter according to the phone call to BWW Law group was
in reference to Bank of America Loan No. 0015847247
2 Goes into the LaSalle Bank aka Bank of America debacle 3
3 Filed against 15 W. Spring St. Shows home is in a 2003 Structured 1

Trust with LaSalle Bank Filed on or around 2-24-2009
4 Filed against 15 W. Spring St. Shows home in 2003 Structured Trust 1

to Wells Fargo Bank Trustee Filed 6-18-2009
5 Exhibits 3 & 4 were signed by Robo Signers Tywanna Thomas, Korell 2

Harp and Linda Green - you will note the signature are different on the
documents. Linda Green
6 Tywana Thomas 2
7 Korell Harp 2
8 Note Allonge Mortgage and Equity Funding Corporation States Note 1

Date Feb 4, 2005
9 Allonge to Note (Investor) FRAUDULENT Dated 2 days prior to 1

the alleged signing of a Note and or settlement Feb 2, 2005
Misleading and VOID on face value Further the Loan # and Servicing
# does not match any other of this property Uses Loan No.
691002604 Settlement and alleged Note date is Feb 4, 2005
10 Allonge to Note Uses Loan No. 7143312465 signed by OCWEN 1

attorney in fact for Wells Fargo Bank NA but, again the POA was not
included in the documents
7
Sent: Friday, November 3, 2017 7:29 AM
To: Davis, Ned <Davis@vsb.org>; McCauley, Jim <mccauley@vsb.org>; doris@cvlas.org; intakereb
<intakereb@vsb.org>; Mark Levine <mark@radioinsidescoop.com>; Dave Albo <dave@davealbo.com>;
Wilson, Marcus H. (WF) (FBI) <marcus.wilson@ic.fbi.gov>; NOVAPC <novapc@ic.fbi.gov>; Washington
Field FBI Email <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>; DelBCarr@house.virginia.gov;
DelBCline@house.virginia.gov; DelBFowler@house.virginia.gov; DelCCollins@house.virginia.gov;
DelDAlbo@house.virginia.gov; DelDBell@house.virginia.gov; DelDBulova@house.virginia.gov; DelEFiller-
Corn@house.virginia.gov; DelGDavis@house.virginia.gov; DelJBell@house.virginia.gov;
DelJBoysko@house.virginia.gov; DelJCampbell@house.virginia.gov; DelJEdmunds@house.virginia.gov;
DelKByron@house.virginia.gov; DelKCox@house.virginia.gov; DelLAdams@house.virginia.gov;
DelLAird@house.virginia.gov; DelLBagby@house.virginia.gov; DelMCole@house.virginia.gov;
DelMDudenhefer@house.virginia.gov; DelMFariss@house.virginia.gov; DelNFreitas@house.virginia.gov;
DelPFarrell@house.virginia.gov; DelRAnderson@house.virginia.gov; DelRBell@house.virginia.gov;
DelRBloxom@house.virginia.gov; DelTAustin@house.virginia.gov; deljbourne@house.virginia.gov
Subject: Fwd: Filed Case No. 1:17 -cv- 819
FYI
JW Grenadier
www.JAMJustice.org
1 Corinthians 13:13

Date: Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 7:12 AM
Subject: Filed Case No. 1:17 -cv- 819
To: jwgvbias@gmail.com, Ilona Grenadier <igrenadier@vafamilylaw.com>, Ben Dimuro
<BDimuro@dimuro.com>, John Ries <jries@alpsnet.com>, bduffett@vafamilylaw.com,
timberlakelewis@msn.com, Nina Ginsberg <NGinsberg@dimuro.com>, "mjwesq@erols.com"
<mjwesq@erols.com>, "Reza, S. Mohsin" <mohsin.reza@troutmansanders.com>,
steve.lewis@troutman.com, "Zinsner, Mary C." <mary.zinsner@troutmansanders.com>, Heba Girgis
<hgirgis@pskfirm.com>, claims@alpsnet.com, intakereb <intakereb@vsb.org>, "Davis, Ned"
<davis@vsb.org>, "McCauley, Jim" <mccauley@vsb.org>, Marc Weisberg <mweisberg@mwc-law.com>,
tMcCabe@mwc-law.com, econway@mwc-law.com, Abby Moynihan <amoynihan@mwc-law.com>
Cc: Washington Field FBI Email <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, NOVAPC <novapc@ic.fbi.gov>,
"Whistleblower (Judiciary-Rep)" <whistleblower@judiciary-rep.senate.gov>, "Wilson, Marcus H. (WF)
(FBI)" <marcus.wilson@ic.fbi.gov>, Chicago FBI <chicago@ic.fbi.gov>, Eric Holder <askdoj@usdoj.gov>,
ABA Commission On Racial and Ethnic Diversity In the Profession
<diversitycommission@americanbar.org>, Katherine Hine' via JudicialMisconduct
<judicialmisconduct@googlegroups.com>, Probate Sharks <verenusl@gmail.com>, Doug Franks
<mactechworks@mac.com>, "Dr. Rich Swier" <drswier@gmail.com>, Newseditors
<newseditors@wsj.com>, Reboot Illinois <comments@rebootillinois.com>, Douglas Kinan
<dougkinan@yahoo.com>, The New York Times <public@nytimes.com>, FBI-
<fraud_aging@aging.senate.gov>, Bridge To Justice <bridge2justice@gmail.com>, Dow Jones
<newseditors@dowjones.com>, ABA Commission On Racial and Ethnic Diversity
<abaminority@americanbar.org>, Angela Woodhull <chachaangelina@yahoo.com>, Governor Bruce
Rauner <officeofgovernor@illinois.gov>, "Truthbetoldradio ( <truthbetoldradio@gmail.com>, Kenneth
Ditkowsky' via Lawsters <lawsters@googlegroups.com>, ACLU <aclu@aclu.org>, The Weekly Standard
<reply-ff011570726707-2196_html-8581477-6247534-
0@weeklystandard.mediadc.com>,govcuff@googlegroups.com, Rabbi Moshe Soloveitchik
<zamirkatan@aol.com>, Jay Goldman <jnjgldmn@aol.com>, Fiduciary Watch
<fiduciarywatch@gmail.com>, 60m Cbs News <60m@cbsnews.com>, Mary Richards
<maryrichards45@gmail.com>, J. Ditkowsky <jdit@aol.com>, JoAnne M Denison
<JoAnne@denisonlaw.com>, The Wall Street Journal <support@wsj.com>, LUCINDA LAMBERT
<gmbauer@q.com>, Andy Ostrowski <ajo@bsolaw.com>, Alyece Russell <llessura@gmail.com>, The
New York Times <letters@nytimes.com>, Marty Prehn <mprehn2004@yahoo.com>, Tribune Alert
<chicagotribune@em.chicagotribune.com>, Diane Nash <sa3456@msn.com>, Robert Grundstein
<rgrunds@pshift.com>, CONTACT US REGARDING HEALTH CARE FRAUD
<https://marygsykes.com/2017/07/26/from-the-us-dept-of-justice-on-health-care-fraud>
<joseph.beemsterboer@usdoj.gov>, ABAJournal.com <webmaster@abajournal.com>, Attorney General
Pam Bondi <agnews@myfloridalegal.com>, Marti Oakley <ppj1@hush.com>, Human Rights FBI DOJ
<hrsptips@usdoj.gov>, Iardc Postmaster <postmaster@iardc.org>, Candice Schwager
<schwagerlawfirm@live.com>, JoAnne M. Denison <joanne@justice4every1.com>, Attorneygeneral Info
<info@attorneygeneral.gov>, Dr. Sam Sugar AAAPG USA <aaapgusa@gmail.com>, Aging Contact
(Aging)" <contact_aging@aging.senate.gov>, Endxploitation <endxploitation@aaapg.net>, Cook Sheriff
<sheriff.dart@cookcountyil.gov>, Edward Carter <ecarter@atg.state.il.us>, Elaine Renoire
<elaine@abusiveguardianships.com>, DOEA INFO <information@elderaffairs.org>, Chicago Lawyer
Magazine <headlines@lbpc.com>, Better Government Association <info@bettergov.org>, PA Governor's
Office <governorsoffice2@pa.gov>, Kevin Pizzarello <kev_pizz@hotmail.com>, AARP Inc
<member@email.aarp.org>, Martha Jantho <utterby@sbcglobal.net>, Sylvia Rudek NASGA
<nasga.us@gmail.com>, The Huffington Post <dailybrief@huffingtonpost.com>, Frontline Press Club
Founder Vaughan Smith <vaughan.smith@frontlineclub.com>, Bev Cooper
<bev.cooperscorner@yahoo.com>, Governor Rick Scott <rick.scott@eog.myflorida.com>, Cook County
States Attorney <statesattorney@cookcountyil.gov>, AMERICANS AGAINST ABUSIVE PROBATE
GUARDIANSHIP — AAAPG <drsam@aaapg.net>, White House <info@messages.whitehouse.gov>, ISBA
Main Discussion Group <isba@list.isba.org>, Summer Chicago <summer.chicago@yahoo.com>, Legal
Abuse Syndrome <legalabuse@gmail.com>, Lisa Madigan Ill Atty Gen Office
<aag_consumer@atg.state.il.us>, The State of Illinois <gov.goca@illinois.gov>, Len Holland
<consult4lj@yahoo.com>, "Paul K. Ogden" <pogden297@gmail.com>, Cynthia Stephens
<cynthiastphns@gmail.com>, The Wall Street Journal <wsj.lts@wsj.com>, ACLU of Illinois
<acluofillinois@aclu-il.org>, Nasga Us <nasga.org@gmail.com>, "David (NBC Universal WRC) Silver"
<david.silver@nbcuni.com>, KRISTI HOOD <khood490@aol.com>, Garr Sanders
<kickdragon7@yahoo.com>, Eric Blair <activistpost@gmail.com>, SUNTIMES <letters@suntimes.com>,
American Bar Association <abajournalereport@americanbar.org>, Illinois ARDC
<illinois.ardc@gmail.com>, Scott Evans <scottcevans@hotmail.com>, John Howard Wyman
<johnhowardwyman@gmail.com>, Harry Heckert <vahrh1135@aol.com>, Roger Weissenberg
<rweissenberg@rothschildinv.com>
Dear Mr. DiMuro,
Please fine attached by response to your Nov 2, filing.
I believe your involvement in Ilona et al's "GANG" started with

your letter April 2009 accusing me of EXTORTION for going
after money that was owed to me. I spent several hours being
interviewed and insisted on it being taped. Detective Pak /
Commonwealth Attorney Randy Sengel - going over all the
documents and the cash flow from what I knew. It was decided
I was going after money that was owed me - THERE WAS NO
EXTORTION - THE MONEY CAN BE PROVEN IT IS OWED TO ME
You are a big FAT LIAR - and it is you and your GANG that
Libeled and Slandered me. It is you and Ilona / GANG that has
ABUSED Your POWER and used BRIBERY to COVER UP.
I am curious were you involved in my being poisoned? I was in

the hospital for 3 days in September after being poisoned.
Judge Hilton does not have JURISDICTION - Judge Anderson

was removed from one case - I wonder why?
If you have heard or read - This might interest you - I have also
attached the recent filing in my Bankruptcy which gives you the
intervene of Linda Kennedy - Which shows this is a pattern and
practice of the Virginia State Bar - oh ya you were president and
to ensure they never investigate you have STATED Clearly and
made it known that you are giving 10% of your estate to them -
that is the appearance of BRIBERY especially when Alps
Insurance hires you and pays your bills. Alps is the only
insurance Co that the Bar recommends and they pay for
dinners, classes, trips of executives etc - VERY COZY
Complaint: Case No. 1:17 -cv- 1106

https://www.scribd.com/document/360592481/Judges-v-Jwg-v-FINAL-USDC-VA-DC-Complaint-
Aug-Sept-2017
Exhibits
https://www.scribd.com/document/361295397/JWG-v-Judges-Exhibits-Certificate-of-Service-
Pic-Oct-2017
Read more at
www.VALaw2010.blogspot.com
See the appearance and your actions are that I am a piece of TRASH for
being Catholic and Standing Up for myself and holding Ilona Accountable -
your friend and one of your GANG. Well you see I am a MOM, I am a person
and I have the same rights you have whether you or your GANG believe that.
YOU AND ILONA ET AL are everything that is wrong in our Country today.
YOU TWO have the POWER TO DESTROY ME AND HAVE - you have also
harmed my girls. I will not do the things you all have done that are illegal - I
will continue to follow the law - but, there is no statue of limitations on the
crimes everyone has committed against me - illegally jailing me et al -
If you have any questions or you wish to settle this - Please feel free to
contact me. But, why should you settle with me. YOU OWN THE JUDGES
JW Grenadier
www.JAMJustice.org
1 Corinthians 13:13
From: JW G <jwgrenadier@gmail.com>
Sent: Sunday, November 19, 2017 6:50 PM
To: McCauley, Jim <mccauley@vsb.org>; intakereb <intakereb@vsb.org>; doris@cvlas.org; Davis, Ned
<Davis@vsb.org>
Subject: The Cover Up of Linda Kennedy by the VSB
Dear All,
It is clear ya'll were involved in the Cover-up of Linda Kennedy -

exposing the Corruption - her documents showing you
tampered with the transcripts and she has assured me that is
just a bit of what she can expose.
Warmly,
JW Grenadier
Courage (Courage (also called bravery or valour) is the choice and willingness to confront agony,
pain, danger, uncertainty, or intimidation. Physical courage is bravery in the face of physical pain,
hardship, death or threat of death, while moral courage is the ability to act rightly in the face of
popular opposition, shame, scandal, discouragement, or personal loss.) So the Injustice does not
happen to someone else.
10/30/2017 ABOUT LINKDA KENNEDY,the national public is becoming aware of what the Virginia State Bar is doing and, not just to Ms. Kennedy, but to a…
Virginia State Bar

Eight and Main Building
707 E. Main Street, Suite 1500
Richmond, Virginia 23219
Dear Virginia State Bar:
Repeatedly, The Virginia State Bar has ignored complaints against its own and its cronies. The mishandling of the Linda Kennedy
matter will be known from now on, on radio and TV and before open court, as "The Virginia State BarGate" and I am putting the bar
on notice that I am exercising my rights to file this in a more public forum due to the bar's insistence on persecuting a leader of the
judicial reform movement for alternative purposes, and not taking complaints and investigating itself and its friends.
The example of injustice will be your fraternity.
Like the farce the bar claimed on the David Murray case, claiming they did not know in spite of Bernie Vaughan repeatedly reporting
Murray for scamming his clients for over $40,000,000, the bar states that they cannot investigate claims against itself and its friends
without more evidence. Oh please. You have the evidence and you know you can look at the file anytime you want to. Just look at the
brief in question which is signed by Linda Cupit.
Look into the secret dismissals. You understand, that you are not the only ones who know about some of this. Do you think we are not
aware of your secret dismissals? I know Ms. Kennedy has not started this battle with the bar, but in case you did not know, she is not
going to just lay down to the mighty, corrupt bar, and I hope she exposes all she knows about this secret society who persecute the
good who speak for the people and bless those who make the legal system a joke. You need to correct this matter immediately and act
properly.
I am making this bar complaint against the following Virginia State Bar attorneys and request that you contact me only in writing:
Thomas Edmonds, Paul Georgiadis, Barbara Williams, and Jim

Mccauley, Rhysa Griffith South
I am also reporting the following private attorneys:
Thomas Lucas, Ruthie Litvin, Henry Sadler, President-elect B.

Dimuro, President M. Glasser, Delgate Johnny Joannou
I am very concerned that the Virginia State Bar is actively protecting those who violate solid; the code of ethics, while at the same
time, persecuting the few attorneys who stand up to the system like Linda Kennedy. As I understand it, Ms. Kennedy has tried to bring
some unethical behavior to the bar's attention, but it has been ignored and she is now being prosecuted for the very things she fights
against. In fact, I understand that her bar complaint against bar staff, Paul Georgiadis was treated administratively by the bar, and then
dismissed secretly as usual by Barbara Williams without even one conversation with Ms. Kennedy first.
I am of the understanding, and please correct me if I am wrong, that at least the last two; or three of your past presidents, also had
secret dismissals of claims of misconduct against them. I am re-reporting any president including, Condo and Keith.
You need to understand that the national public is becoming aware of what the Virginia State Bar is doing and, not just to Ms.
Kennedy, but to a number of innocent victims, while protecting those who are guilty. We will not be silenced any longer when we see
these injustices. The persecution of Ms. Kennedy is an outrage! The country is catching on and Virginia is catching on.
I am making this complaint against Williams, Edmonds, Mccauley, and Georgiadis because I believe that Jim Mccauley was involved
in the scheme to discredit Ms. Kennedy, changing his story until he found out Ms. Kennedy had credible witnesses and evidence to
the contrary. He additionally told Ms. Kennedy, as did Georgiadis, that they were not permitted to speak to each other but then did.
Then the story changed again to cover up for being caught speaking to each other.
I am reporting Mr. Edmonds, and Ms. Williams because they are actively covering up and permitting the persecution of Ms. Kennedy,
while dismissing valid complaints while directing this continuing fraud against the few good attorneys left. I also believe that they
have been involved in the firing or dismissal of any prosecutors that actually are doing their jobs and prosecuting the public without
bias. In fact, the prosecutor who "voluntarily" left the bar to seek other opportunities we believe was involved with the cover-up of the
David Murray theft, which many know the bar had full knowledge, and we believe was involved with several other cover-ups, pulling
cases from others, and secretly and quietly dismissing these complaints and even sealing trial records of fraud, forgery, and other
http://www.freedom-school.com/truth/bar_complaint.htm 1/3
abuses against the public (please see Alan Croft representation of Soland and others). I am reporting Thomas Edmonds specifically for
the handling of the Soland case where he intentionally pulled off a prosecutor and dismissed the matter, in spite of overwhelming
evidence to the contrary. I understand that she was later disbarred or suspended anyway, however, this cronyism must end.
I am reporting President Glasser because the persecution of Ms. Kennedy, is going on under his watch and with his firm's knowledge.
I am reporting the bar for secretly dismissing Delegate Johnny Joannou, who it appears, because of his connections politically and
otherwise, was not prosecuted on some very serious allegations
I am also concerned about an adoption that one of your bar staff may have handled before being employed, which may have been a
part of a fraud perpetrated on the court, as well as a matter which one of your staff may have handled in regard to the immigration of a
family member who was wanted by the federal government, but due to the cover-up, that person is now residing in Virginia a free man.
This needs to be investigated further as we do not need the most unethical attorneys prosecuting those who are not unethical, and
handling claims made by the public in such an unethical manner. I suggest you start your investigation with Mr. Georgiadis. If I am
mistaken, then please provide me with the evidence that proves this.
I am interested in hearing why Linda Cupit who wrote and signed a brief in question, and
Mr. Lucas who may have tape recorded a third-party conversation and then used it to try
to force the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission to give him back damaging documents were ignored by the bar (to name
just two allegations being made by Ms. Kennedy were ignored). Doesn't this sound like malicious prosecution to you? Doesn't it seem
that the public would raise concern that only after a very popular Ms. Kennedy reported the bar back to the bar, did she receive a third
complaint against her brought by the bar prosecutor, Georgiadis, himself, who she made a bar complaint against? I understand that
Ms. Litvin was also involved in keeping evidence from Ms. Kennedy during the underlying case, as well as several other unethical
behaviors while teaming with Mr. Lucas, so I am reporting her too.
I am wondering how Mr. Sadler, who I understand has brought forth cases for the claimant and her boyfriend and their "friends" on
many other matters, using the same type of approach, which included trying to hold the opposing party hostage (do this or else), and
involved bearing false witness has not been investigated. I understand that Mr. Sadler was involved in the past action against a "mom
and pop" who was unfortunate enough to have stumbled into their litigation web. It is my understanding that, Mr. Sadler handled
some of the complainants and their friends bankruptcies, including one of the defendants the claimant was actually suing, and
alleging harassed her. I understand that this same defendant was making behind the scenes deals with the complainant's boyfriend. As
I understand it, the complainants in this matter are known to be litigious. And, I also understand that Mr. Sadler even hired a school
friend to bear witness against Ms. Kennedy but although he tried, could not do so. I am reporting Mr. Sadler.
President-Elect Dimuro is presently involved in what I believe should be considered a frivolous law suit, with no basis in fact,
however his client does have money to pay him. Instead of being investigated, he is going to be the next bar president. I am reporting
him.
I am reporting Rhysa Griffith South for allowing these secret and unfair procedures used by the bar, including dismissing complaints
against Linda Cupit who wrote and signed the brief in question. Ms. South also dismissed Thomas Lucas for serious violations.
I make a Freedom of Information Request to the Virginia State Bar: Disclose

any gifts that were either given to you or received by you either personally or in your capacity as a bar agent, which had anything
whatsoever to do with your connection with the Virginia State Bar. I want to know the amount and description of the gift, who it was
from and to, the purpose for the gift, and the date given or received. I define the word "gift" in the most expansive way possible. Please
provide me this information for the last 5 years, beginning in 1997. I understand that this request has been made several times, without
the bar responding to the request so you should not need any extensions on time past the statutory period given.
Additionally, through FOIA I would like the names of all who are reporting the bar back to the bar for its mishandling of Ms. Kennedy,
which is for purposes of harassing Ms. Kennedy, The People's Attorney." I understand that you are actually using her writings which
call for accountability in the judiciary against her as evidence of her alleged crimes. Although I am not a lawyer, doesn't that sound
like Mr. Georgiadis is trying to falsely poison the judiciary against her, while stifling her Freedom of Speech? I report him for
harassing Ms. Kennedy, and for bringing forth this evidence for the sole purpose of attempting to unduly influence the judiciary. If
someone becomes a lawyer, do they have to then keep their mouths shut or suffer these consequences? Is this how the Virginia State
Bar is protecting the public? It sounds to me that you are actually sending a message to attorneys who might otherwise be more public
friendly.
I hope these matters will finally be looked into in a good faith manner, and that you will disclose the information timely so that these
matters can be resolved or taken to the next level. If they are not treated in good faith, however, there are plenty of Virginians that are
fed up with what the bar is doing. Ms. Kennedy is one of the few attorneys who still cares about the public and we do not appreciate
you trying to take her from the community, which is not in our best interest. We understand we have statutory rights to take care of
this matter in a more open court forum if this matter is not properly handled from here on by the bar.
I have not filed a Virginia complaint before. I know Ms. Kennedy as she is nationally recognized as a leader for the underdog litigant
and has a radio show heard nationally (and I believe internationally as well). Ms. Kennedy is not my attorney, but I would have no
problem hire or trusting her, unlike those who you have protected.
__________________________________
cc:
All VA Supreme Court Justices: I am requesting that my complaint be filed in your court as public record and that an immediate
investigation into the bar's activitives begin including but not limited to the bar's persecution of Linda Kennedy:
100 North Ninth Street, Fifth Floor, Richmond, VA 23219

Clerk for:
Hon. Harry L. Carrico, Chief Justice
Hon. Elizabeth B. Lacy, Justice
Hon. Leroy Rountree Hassell, Sr., Justice
Hon. Barbara Milano Keenan, Justice
Hon. Lawrence L. Koontz, Jr., Justice
Hon. Cynthia D. Kinser, Justice
Hon. Donald W. Lemons, Justice
and to:
Porsmouth Circuit Court: I am requesting that my complaint be filed in your court as public record and that an immediate
investigation into the bar's activitives begin including but not limited to the bar's persecution of Linda Kennedy:
Portsmouth Circuit Court

601 Crawford Parkway, P.O. Box Drawer 1217, Portsmouth, VA 23705
BACK
Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2017 4:58 AM
To: jwgvbias@gmail.com; Ilona Grenadier <igrenadier@vafamilylaw.com>; Ben Dimuro
<BDimuro@dimuro.com>; John Ries <jries@alpsnet.com>; bduffett@vafamilylaw.com;
timberlakelewis@msn.com; Nina Ginsberg <NGinsberg@dimuro.com>; mjwesq@erols.com; Reza, S.
Mohsin <mohsin.reza@troutmansanders.com>; steve.lewis@troutman.com; Zinsner, Mary C.
<mary.zinsner@troutmansanders.com>; Heba Girgis <hgirgis@pskfirm.com>; claims@alpsnet.com;
intakereb <intakereb@vsb.org>; Davis, Ned <Davis@vsb.org>; McCauley, Jim <mccauley@vsb.org>;
Marc Weisberg <mweisberg@mwc-law.com>; tMcCabe@mwc-law.com; econway@mwc-law.com; Abby
Moynihan <amoynihan@mwc-law.com>
Cc: Washington Field FBI Email <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>; NOVAPC <novapc@ic.fbi.gov>;
Whistleblower (Judiciary-Rep) <whistleblower@judiciary-rep.senate.gov>; Wilson, Marcus H. (WF) (FBI)
<marcus.wilson@ic.fbi.gov>; Chicago FBI <chicago@ic.fbi.gov>; Eric Holder <askdoj@usdoj.gov>; ABA
Commission On Racial and Ethnic Diversity In the Profession <diversitycommission@americanbar.org>;
Katherine Hine' via JudicialMisconduct <judicialmisconduct@googlegroups.com>; Probate Sharks
<verenusl@gmail.com>; Doug Franks <mactechworks@mac.com>; Dr. Rich Swier
<drswier@gmail.com>; Newseditors <newseditors@wsj.com>; Reboot Illinois
<comments@rebootillinois.com>; Douglas Kinan <dougkinan@yahoo.com>; The New York Times
<public@nytimes.com>; FBI- <fraud_aging@aging.senate.gov>; Bridge To Justice
<bridge2justice@gmail.com>; Dow Jones <newseditors@dowjones.com>; ABA Commission On Racial
and Ethnic Diversity <abaminority@americanbar.org>; Angela Woodhull <chachaangelina@yahoo.com>;
Governor Bruce Rauner <officeofgovernor@illinois.gov>; Truthbetoldradio (
<truthbetoldradio@gmail.com>, Kenneth Ditkowsky' via Lawsters <lawsters@googlegroups.com>, ACLU
<aclu@aclu.org>, The Weekly Standard <reply-ff011570726707-2196_html-8581477-6247534-
0@weeklystandard.mediadc.com>,govcuff@googlegroups.com, Rabbi Moshe Soloveitchik
<zamirkatan@aol.com>, Jay Goldman <jnjgldmn@aol.com>, Fiduciary Watch
<fiduciarywatch@gmail.com>, 60m Cbs News <60m@cbsnews.com>, Mary Richards
<maryrichards45@gmail.com>, J. Ditkowsky <jdit@aol.com>, JoAnne M Denison <JoAnne@denis
<contact_aging@aging.senate.gov>; Endxploitation <endxploitation@aaapg.net>; Cook Sheriff
<sheriff.dart@cookcountyil.gov>; Edward Carter <ecarter@atg.state.il.us>; Elaine Renoire
<elaine@abusiveguardianships.com>; DOEA INFO <information@elderaffairs.org>; Chicago Lawyer
Magazine <headlines@lbpc.com>; Better Government Association <info@bettergov.org>; PA Governor's
Office <governorsoffice2@pa.gov>; Kevin Pizzarello <kev_pizz@hotmail.com>; AARP Inc
<member@email.aarp.org>; Martha Jantho <utterby@sbcglobal.net>; Sylvia Rudek NASGA
<nasga.us@gmail.com>; The Huffington Post <dailybrief@huffingtonpost.com>; Frontline Press Club
Founder Vaughan Smith <vaughan.smith@frontlineclub.com>; Bev Cooper
<bev.cooperscorner@yahoo.com>; Governor Rick Scott <rick.scott@eog.myflorida.com>; Cook County
States Attorney <statesattorney@cookcountyil.gov>; AMERICANS AGAINST ABUSIVE PROBATE
GUARDIANSHIP — AAAPG <drsam@aaapg.net>; White House <info@messages.whitehouse.gov>; ISBA
Main Discussion Group <isba@list.isba.org>; Summer Chicago <summer.chicago@yahoo.com>; Legal
Abuse Syndrome <legalabuse@gmail.com>; Lisa Madigan Ill Atty Gen Office
<aag_consumer@atg.state.il.us>; The State of Illinois <gov.goca@illinois.gov>; Len Holland
<consult4lj@yahoo.com>; Paul K. Ogden <pogden297@gmail.com>; Cynthia Stephens
<cynthiastphns@gmail.com>; The Wall Street Journal <wsj.lts@wsj.com>; ACLU of Illinois
<acluofillinois@aclu-il.org>; Nasga Us <nasga.org@gmail.com>; David (NBC Universal WRC) Silver
<david.silver@nbcuni.com>; KRISTI HOOD <khood490@aol.com>; Garr Sanders
<kickdragon7@yahoo.com>; Eric Blair <activistpost@gmail.com>; SUNTIMES <letters@suntimes.com>;
American Bar Association <abajournalereport@americanbar.org>; Illinois ARDC
<illinois.ardc@gmail.com>; Scott Evans <scottcevans@hotmail.com>; John Howard Wyman
<johnhowardwyman@gmail.com>; Harry Heckert <vahrh1135@aol.com>; Roger Weissenberg
<rweissenberg@rothschildinv.com>; Donald J. Trump for President, Inc. <info@donaldtrump.com>;
district12@senate.virginia.gov; district30 <district30@senate.virginia.gov>;
district07@senate.virginia.gov; district33@senate.virginia.gov; Brian.Moran@governor.va.gov;
bryan.porter@alexandriava.gov; Allison Silberberg <allison.silberberg@alexandriava.gov>;
jkloch@juridicalsolutions.com; asimpson@juridicalsolutions.com; jmcgrath@juridicalsolutions.com;
lisa.kemler@alexandriava.com; info@juridicalsolutions.com; Mark Levine
<DelMLevine@house.virginia.gov>; nce@house.virginia.gov, DelRDance@house.virginia.gov,
DelTKilgore@hou <DelWAbbitt@house.virginia.gov>; nce@house.virginia.gov,
DelTKilgore@hou <DelWArmstrong@house.virginia.gov>; nce@house.virginia.gov,
DelTKilgore@hou <DelWBarlow@house.virginia.gov>; DelTKilgore@house.virginia.gov;
DelJLeMunyon@house.virginia.gov; DelJLindsey@house.virginia.gov;
DelSLingamfelter@house.virginia.gov; DelALopez@house.virginia.gov;
DelMWebert@house.virginia.gov; DelTWilt@house.virginia.gov; jake.rubenstein@governor.virginia.gov;
Simon, Noah <Noah.Simon@mail.house.gov>; Noah Bookbinder <info@citizensforethics.org>; Vernon
Miles <Vmiles@connectionnewspapers.com>; Response Action Network <info@responseaction.com>;
info@altright.com; Attorneygeneral Info <info@attorneygeneral.gov>; Randy Shulman
<editor@metroweekly.com>; editor@valawyersmedia.com; Arlington Editor
<arlingtonnews@gmail.com>; editor@washintonexaminer.com; Washingtonian Magazine
<editorial@washingtonian.com>; editor@connectionnewspaper.com; Editors@newsweek.com; Law360
Editor <editor@law360.com>; editor.reuters@reuters.com; NLJ Weekend Edition
<nationallawjournal@alm.com>; editor@aol.com; elizabeth.wilson@richmond.edu; Turrell, Elizabeth
<eturrell@wusa9.com>; Elizabeth.a.vargas@abc.com; elizabeth.vargas@abc.com;
news@timesdispatch.com; 60m Cbs News <60m@cbsnews.com>; Assignment Manager
<newsroom@whsv.com>; traci.miller@richmondgov.com; Shannon Heard <sheard@dls.virginia.gov>;
Full Measure with Sharyl Attkisson <fullmeasurenews@gmail.com>; AbramsReport@msnbc.com; Ben
Lane <blane@housingwire.com>; The Washington Times <member@washingtontimesemail.com>; The
New York Times <letters@nytimes.com>; themorningemail@huffingtonpost.com; FBI- ( (
<civilrights.cv@ic.fbi.gov>; Federal Bureau of Investigation <fbi@service.govdelivery.com>; Human
Rights FBI DOJ <hrsptips@usdoj.gov>
Subject: Re: Filed Case No. 1:17 -cv- 819
Happy Thanksgiving - I still Live in the "HELL" of what you have

done to protect and ignore the criminal acts and actions of
Divorce Lawyer Ilona Grenadier Heckman -
But, why should any of you do the right thing when you "OWN"
the Judges - yet Judge Hilton has admitted to and Recused due
to his BIAS -
When the abuse of the Judges comes Public - Will the abuse of
Lawyers?
JW Grenadier
www.VALaw2010.Blogspot.com
Sent with
On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 7:12 AM, JW Grenadier <jwgrenadier@gmail.com> wrote:

Dear Mr. DiMuro,
Please fine attached by response to your Nov 2, filing.

I believe your involvement in Ilona et al's "GANG" started with
your letter April 2009 accusing me of EXTORTION for going
after money that was owed to me. I spent several hours being
interviewed and insisted on it being taped. Detective Pak /
Commonwealth Attorney Randy Sengel - going over all the
documents and the cash flow from what I knew. It was decided
I was going after money that was owed me - THERE WAS NO
EXTORTION - THE MONEY CAN BE PROVEN IT IS OWED TO ME
You are a big FAT LIAR - and it is you and your GANG that
Libeled and Slandered me. It is you and Ilona / GANG that has
ABUSED Your POWER and used BRIBERY to COVER UP.
I am curious were you involved in my being poisoned? I was in

the hospital for 3 days in September after being poisoned.
Judge Hilton does not have JURISDICTION - Judge Anderson

was removed from one case - I wonder why?
If you have heard or read - This might interest you - I have also
attached the recent filing in my Bankruptcy which gives you the
intervene of Linda Kennedy - Which shows this is a pattern and
practice of the Virginia State Bar - oh ya you were president and
to ensure they never investigate you have STATED Clearly and
made it known that you are giving 10% of your estate to them -
that is the appearance of BRIBERY especially when Alps
Insurance hires you and pays your bills. Alps is the only
insurance Co that the Bar recommends and they pay for
dinners, classes, trips of executives etc - VERY COZY
Complaint: Case No. 1:17 -cv- 1106
https://www.scribd.com/document/360592481/Judges-v-Jwg-v-FINAL-USDC-VA-DC-Complaint-
Aug-Sept-2017
Exhibits
https://www.scribd.com/document/361295397/JWG-v-Judges-Exhibits-Certificate-of-Service-
Pic-Oct-2017
Read more at
www.VALaw2010.blogspot.com
See the appearance and your actions are that I am a piece of TRASH for
being Catholic and Standing Up for myself and holding Ilona Accountable -
your friend and one of your GANG. Well you see I am a MOM, I am a person
and I have the same rights you have whether you or your GANG believe that.
YOU AND ILONA ET AL are everything that is wrong in our Country today.
YOU TWO have the POWER TO DESTROY ME AND HAVE - you have also
harmed my girls. I will not do the things you all have done that are illegal - I
will continue to follow the law - but, there is no statue of limitations on the
crimes everyone has committed against me - illegally jailing me et al -
If you have any questions or you wish to settle this - Please feel free to
contact me. But, why should you settle with me. YOU OWN THE JUDGES
JW Grenadier
www.JAMJustice.org
1 Corinthians 13:13
Sent: Friday, December 1, 2017 7:12 AM
To: McCauley, Jim <mccauley@vsb.org>; intakereb <intakereb@vsb.org>; Doris Causey
<doris@cvlas.org>; Davis, Ned <Davis@vsb.org>; Mark Levine <mark@radioinsidescoop.com>; Dave
Albo <dave@davealbo.com>; Wilson, Marcus H. (WF) (FBI) <marcus.wilson@ic.fbi.gov>; NOVAPC
<novapc@ic.fbi.gov>; Washington Field FBI Email <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>;
DelCHerring@house.virginia.gov; Adam Ebbin <ebbinoffice@gmail.com>;
jake.rubenstein@governor.virginia.gov; Gould, Karen <Gould@vsb.org>; Brennan, Renu
<brennan@vsb.org>; Bodie, James <Bodie@vsb.org>
Subject: Re: The Cover Up of Linda Kennedy by the VSB
Dear Ms. Blanton,
I had hoped to hear back from you on the complaints against

Ilona Grenadier Heckman and others. As it appears again you
are using as you did with Linda Kennedy the same injustice
against me. It appears http://www.vsb.org/docs/Hartke-
100711.pdf Home / News in Brief / Lawyer suspended until 2024
Lawyer suspended until 2024

By: Peter Vieth September 15, 2017
A lawyer discipline panel has tacked on an additional five years to a prior three-year suspension for a Reston
attorney who allegedly made a false statement to a judge. The Virginia State Bar Disciplinary Board said bar
prosecutors had proven that Wayne R. Hartke knowingly made a false statement of fact to a tribunal when
he ...
It appears you pick and choose who you wish to allow to Lie in
Court, Lie in Court documents - Mislead and lie in court to have
me jailed as Andrea Mosley and best friend to Judge James
Clark / Micheal Wieser did. To help cover up the Criminal Spree
of Divorce Lawyer Ilona Grenadier Heckman - using a Forged
Trust Document to steal Real Estate and Monies from Sonia
Grenadier and then me with a Liquidation Agreement done by a
lawyer not licensed in Virginia. The Intervene from Linda
Kennedy shows the corruption and collusion of the BAR in the
SALE for Money when it comes to any type of Justice in Virginia.
AGAIN - please update me on my complaint which started years

ago - at the demand of the Ethics council the information first
being sent to his home - his attempt to cover up for his friends
as he did in the Linda Kennedy situation, he according to her
and documents shows tampered with the transcripts.
Again please update me on my complaints.

Warmly,
JW Grenadier
On Sun, Nov 19, 2017 at 6:50 PM, JW G <jwgrenadier@gmail.com> wrote:

Dear All,
It is clear ya'll were involved in the Cover-up of Linda Kennedy -

exposing the Corruption - her documents showing you
tampered with the transcripts and she has assured me that is
just a bit of what she can expose.
Warmly,
JW Grenadier
From: JW Grenadier <jwgrenadier3@gmail.com>
Sent: Monday, February 26, 2018 8:04 AM
To: Rhetta M. Daniel <rhettamdaniel@rhettaesq.com>
Cc: Bodie, James <Bodie@vsb.org>; Gould, Karen <Gould@vsb.org>; Davis, Ned <Davis@vsb.org>;
Montgomery, Kathryn <Montgomery@vsb.org>; Davis, Davida <ddavis@vsb.org>; vsb fax
<18047750597@myfax.com>; david gogal <17036913913@myfax.com>; doris causey
<doris@cvlas.org>; james whitener <invwhitener@gmail.com>; intakereb <intakereb@vsb.org>;
McCauley, Jim <mccauley@vsb.org>; Whistleblower (Judiciary-Rep) <whistleblower@judiciary-
rep.senate.gov>; sarah.isgur.flores@usdoj.gov; Human Rights FBI DOJ <hrsptips@usdoj.gov>; Wilson,
Marcus H. (WF) (FBI) <marcus.wilson@ic.fbi.gov>; Washington Field FBI Email
<washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>; NOVAPC <novapc@ic.fbi.gov>; Simon, Noah
<Noah.Simon@mail.house.gov>; Kempf, Donald (ATR) <donald.kempf@usdoj.gov>;
andrew.finch@usdoj.gov
Subject: Re: 2/17/18 - Notice as Counsel for Janice Wolk Grenadier VSB Complaints against Bernard J.
DiMuro, Esquire, and Multiple Other Attorneys
To the Virginia State Bar,
Ms. Rhetta Daniel is my council for all VIRGINIA STATE BAR

complaints filed by me Janice Wolk Grenadier. That at the
advice of ETHICS Council James Micheal McCauley all
complaints were combined, to as he STATED made it easier for
the BAR to investigate this came after his having me send all
evidence to his home where he sat on such evidence for over
one year.
THERE IS NO STATUE of LIMITATIONS as all criminal acts and

actions of all involved are tolling and involve the title of REAL
PROPERTY that has by lawyers been DAMAGED with the use of
fraudulent documents through FORGERY (on a TRUST
Addendum et al), USE of a LIQUIDATION AGREEMENT
WITHOUT my SIGNATURE and done by a lawyer not licensed in
Virginia, with the JUDGE (ie: Trustee on all Loans et al) ruling
having a FINANCIAL interest in the outcome HIS ORDERS. That
the VALUE of my LOSSES is over $100 Million with the Libel and
Slander / RELIGIOUS HATE shown by lawyer Ilona Grenadier
Heckman and her "GANG" as documents in support of
Complaints along with the Cover Up for Financial gain by many
throughout the STATE of VIRGINIA.
That the Complaints against Lawyers were hand delivered and

stamped into the RECORD and others mailed in for
DiMuroGinsberg: Ben DiMuro and others, Reed Smith - Ann
Schmidt, TroutmanSanders aka Mays and Valentine: Reza
Moshin and others, BWW Law Group: Howard Bierman and
others, Michael Wieser Esq, Grenadier Anderson Strace and
Duffett: Ilona Grenadier and others et al
That all emails and request for updates have been ignored since
then, and so I stopped by the BAR in Richmond and spoke with
intake and have evidence of such conversation and was
ensured I would receive updates which have not happened.
AGAIN I DEMAND all information on Complaints with the

Virginia State Bar including and not limited to any documents
that are deemed sealed, to be listed with any documents sealed
be given in a list, and what the document states to have it
sealed and or any documents that are for PERSONAL OR SHOW
FINANCIAL misconduct by all lawyers including VIRGINIA STATE
BAR LAWYERS who have acted inappropriately in this
investigation to be sent to my lawyer in this investigation
Rhetta Daniels. That all documents are to be transmitted
through electronic e-mail to Rhetta Daniels
at rhettamdaniel@rhettaesq.com
That all past complaints that have been denied were denied
with no law only as Intake lawyer Mr. Brodie stated very clearly
to me "We don't have to investigate anything we don't want to,
as we don't take money from the STATE" I have learned this is
a LIE - no different than what FAKE NEWS reports. That by all
appearance Mr. Brodie a lawyer I believe has violated the
Professional Code of Ethics, his Oath of office and several laws
violated for financial gain of himself and the VSB.
If this is not done by 5 pm on Tuesday, February 27, 2018, I will

request Ms. Daniels on my behalf to immediately take the next
legal steps to ensure JUSTICE for me against the VIRGINIA
STATE BAR due to the appearance that the VSB has colluded,
violated my rights through Virginia and the United States
Constitution to Justice and monies owed me by law. That the
VSB has EMPOWERED the above lawyers to lie in court, to lie in
court documents using finanacil gain of Judges who have active
law licenses by all appearance with the VSB. That I will look to
be made whole by the VSB for the COVER-UP / Collusion /
FINANCIAL gain of the BAR and BAR lawyers by ignoring these
complaints and violating the law and there own Professional
Code of Conduct.
I appreciate your help in resolving this before we MUST take

the next steps. If you have any other questions please contact
my attorney Rhetta Daniels. That all documents are to be
transmitted through electronic e-mail to Rhetta Daniels
at rhettamdaniel@rhettaesq.com
Warmly,
On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 1:40 PM, Rhetta M. Daniel <rhettamdaniel@rhettaesq.com> wrote:
Dear Counsel:
No one from the VSB has responded to me regarding my representation of Janice Wol-
Grenadier and the VSB Complaints that she has filed with the VSB.
I must have this information promptly in order to represent my client.
Sincerely,
Rhetta
On Sat, Feb 17, 2018 at 3:47 PM, Rhetta M. Daniel <rhettamdaniel@rhettaesq.com> wrote:
DATE: FEBRUARY 17, 2018
TO: VSB COUNSEL LISTED ABOVE & VSB DISCIPLINARY CLERK
RE: NOTICE OF COUNSEL FOR JANICE WOLK-GRENADIER
FROM: RHETTA M. DANIEL, ESQUIRE
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL
&
REQUEST FOR WRITTEN STATUS REPORTS
FOR ALL PENDING AND PRIOR VSB COMPLAINTS
FILED BY JANICE WOLK-GRENADIER
NOTICE OF COUNSEL:
I am counsel for Janice Wolk-Grenadier for all pending Complaints and all prior
Complaints filed by Ms. Grenadier against Bernard J. DiMuro, Esquire, and all other
attorneys, including Ms. Wolk-Grendier's VSB Complaint(s) filed against Ilona Grenadier
Heckman, Esquire.
Ms. Grendier informed me that many of her VSB Complaints appear to be lying dormant
and that despite her requests, she has been unable to obtain any status information is
writing from the VSB.
REQUEST FOR STATUS UPDATES:
I would appreciate receiving an immediate written update from all assigned bar counsel
for all pending and prior Complaints filed by Ms. Wolk-Grenadier.
Please send me the written updates on the status of all the Wolk-Grenadier filed VSB
Complaints by February 24, 2018.
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED.
Rhetta M..Daniel, Esquire
Counsel for Janice Wolk-Grenadier
cc: Jance Wolk-Grenadier

Inv. James Whitener
--
Rhetta M. Daniel, Esquire

Attorney at Law
Email: rhettamdaniel@gmail.com
Website: rhettaesq.com
Mailing Address:
3420 Pump Road, # 170

Richmond, VA 23233
(804) 641-9574 (Office)

(866) 431-2331 (FAX)
NOTICE OF CONFIDENTIALITY
This transmittal may contain a confidential attorney-client communication from
the Law Office of Rhetta M. Daniel.
The information is for the use of person(s) identified by address or content. Any
disclosure, including the intended recipient, is expressly prohibited. Disclosure of
contents includes, without limitation, forwarding, copying, or other publication.
The information in this e-mail is confidential and is not legal advice, unless you
have signed a written contract with the firm. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or
copying is strictly prohibited.If you are not the intended recipient, you have
received this transmittal in error. Please notify us immediately by email reply or
by telephone (804-641-9574) and delete this message and attachments from your
system. Thank you.
Get a signature like this. CLICK HERE.
--
Rhetta M. Daniel, Esquire

Attorney at Law
Email: rhettamdaniel@gmail.com
Website: rhettaesq.com
Mailing Address:
3420 Pump Road, # 170

Richmond, VA 23233
(804) 641-9574 (Office)

(866) 431-2331 (FAX)
NOTICE OF CONFIDENTIALITY
This transmittal may contain a confidential attorney-client communication from

the Law Office of Rhetta M. Daniel.
The information is for the use of person(s) identified by address or content. Any
disclosure, including the intended recipient, is expressly prohibited. Disclosure of
contents includes, without limitation, forwarding, copying, or other publication.
The information in this e-mail is confidential and is not legal advice, unless you
have signed a written contract with the firm. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or
copying is strictly prohibited.If you are not the intended recipient, you have
received this transmittal in error. Please notify us immediately by email reply or
by telephone (804-641-9574) and delete this message and attachments from your
system. Thank you.
Get a signature like this. CLICK HERE.
--
JW Grenadier
popular opposition, shame, scandal, discouragement, or perso
From: JW Grenadier <jwgtruth@gmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, March 1, 2018 1:20 PM
To: Davis, Davida <ddavis@vsb.org>; wilson, marcus h. (wf) (fbi) <marcus.wilson@ic.fbi.gov>; novapc
<novapc@ic.fbi.gov>; simon, noah <noah.simon@mail.house.gov>; washington field fbi email
<washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>; kozeny, jill (grassley) <jill_kozeny@grassley.senate.gov>; kempf, donald
(atr) <donald.kempf@usdoj.gov>; andrew.finch@usdoj.gov; sarah.isgur.flores@usdoj.gov; Gould, Karen
<Gould@vsb.org>; Bodie, James <Bodie@vsb.org>; Davis, Ned <Davis@vsb.org>; Montgomery, Kathryn
<Montgomery@vsb.org>; david gogal <17036913913@myfax.com>; doris causey <doris@cvlas.org>;
james whitener <invwhitener@gmail.com>; intakereb <intakereb@vsb.org>; dana.boente@fbi.gov;
Brennan, Renu <brennan@vsb.org>; Shoenfeld, Elizabeth <shoenfeld@vsb.org>; Corey, Christine
<corey@vsb.org>; Saunders, Brent <saunders@vsb.org>; Prince, Scott <prince@vsb.org>; McCauley, Jim
<mccauley@vsb.org>; Franco, Paulo <Franco@vsb.org>; Uston, Katie <uston@vsb.org>; Dillon, Ed
<dillon@vsb.org>; Martelino, Mary <martelino@vsb.org>; Saunders, Barbara <bsaunders@vsb.org>;
Booberg, Laura <booberg@vsb.org>; Moffatt, Cam <Moffatt@vsb.org>; david fennessey vsb
<fennesseyvsb@gmail.com>; Sterling, Bill <sterling@vsb.org>; Jackson, David <Jackson@vsb.org>;
McCall, Ron <mccall@vsb.org>; Marshall, Lisa <marshall@vsb.org>; powell@vsb.org; Byrd, Vivian
<Byrd@vsb.org>; baker@vvsb.org; Fuller, Laurie <Fuller@vsb.org>; Daniel, Sylvia <Daniel@vsb.org>;
Waldeck, Bonnie <Waldeck@vsb.org>; vsb fax <18047750597@myfax.com>; virginia supreme court
<18047866249@myfax.com>; Guggenheim, Seth <Guggenheim@vsb.org>; Hedrick, Emily
<hedrick@vsb.org>
Cc: rhettamdaniel@rhettaesq.com
Subject: JWgGenadier3@gmail.com Account Corrupted / HACKED
My account has been corrupted / hacked from this e-mail earlier sent. You will need to respond to this
e-mail address
The lase e-mail READ:
To the Virginia State Bar:
My lawyer Retta Daniels forwarded to me an e-mail that

once again had no STATUS UPDATE
Nowhere does this give a STATUS UPDATE or state
where a lawyer who is not licensed in VIRGINIA can be
hired by a lawyer in VIRGINIA to create a document to use
to DEFRAUD all the homeowners that such document was
used to sell properties now creating a cloud on
their PROPERTY titles. The only way this works is to
use a JUDGE like JUDGE JAMES CLARK who was the
TRUSTEE on all the loans.
JUDGE CLARK lost immunity when he illegally jailed me

for BEN DIMURO and MICHEAL WEISER to collect there
illegally gotten legal fees which you seem to wish to
ignore.
I also have not had explained to me WHY you EMPOWER

lawyers to lie in court and lie in court documents - or to
have ETHICS lawyers employed by you have documents
sent to his HOME and not to his OFFICE and then to
THREATEN ME?
I understand that you have held other lawyers in other
states accountable - I have spoken with and will be
forwarding them and there lawyers the facts that you PICK
and CHOSE which LAWYERS by MONIES and POWER
whom you INVESTIGATE
1. AGAIN UPDATE the STATUS of WHERE

COMPLAINTS are -
2. PROVIDE LAW used to allow lawyers not licensed in

Virginia to PRACTICE law and create documents for other
POWERFUL and WEALTHY lawyers to use to STEAL
REAL ESTATE and MONIES through there law firm is
legal?
3. WHERE FORGERY of a signature is used by a lawyer

to further steal REAL ESTATE and MONIES is legal
through there law firm
4. Where a JUDGE to further illegally jail a victim to line

the pockets of lawyers financially is legal
5. WHERE a lawyer who represented me / JWG is then

legally allowed to represent the opposing side when I have
stated clearly I do not give permission for such
representation
I am sure I will have other questions - but, I look forward to

the answers to these - as do some of the VICTIMS of the
VSB
PLEASE TAKE NOTE ALL DOCUMENTS ARE NOT TO
BE SHREDDED this includes any and all documents,
internal e-mails for subpoena purposes if need be.
That a response to me and my lawyer RHETTA DANIELS

and others cc'd by 5 pm today. Thursday, March 1, 2018,
especially the Lawyers form the Department of Justice and
FBI agents and lawyer Dana Boenta and please STOP all
the BULLSHIT and do your jobs answer the above
questions.
Thank you,
Warmly,

202-368-7178
Courage (Courage (also called bravery or valour) is the choice and willingness to
confront agony, pain, danger, uncertainty, or intimidation. Physical courage is bravery in the face of
physical pain, hardship, death or threat of death, while moral courage is the ability to act rightly in
the face of popular opposition, shame, scandal, discouragement, or personal loss.) So the Injustice
does not happen to someone else.
3/1/2018 Gmail - 2/17/18 - Notice as Counsel for Janice Wolk Grenadier VSB Complaints against Bernard J. DiMuro, Esquire, and Multiple Other Attorneys
JW Grenadier <jwgrenadier3@gmail.com>
2/17/18 - Notice as Counsel for Janice Wolk Grenadier VSB Complaints against Bernard J. DiMuro,
Esquire, and Multiple Other Attorneys
JW Grenadier <jwgrenadier3@gmail.com> Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 10:06 AM
Reply-To: jwgrenadier3@gmail.com
To: "davis, davida" <ddavis@vsb.org>, "wilson, marcus h. (wf) (fbi)" <marcus.wilson@ic.fbi.gov>, novapc <novapc@ic.fbi.gov>, "simon, noah"
<noah.simon@mail.house.gov>, washington field fbi email <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, "kozeny, jill (grassley)" <jill_kozeny@grassley.senate.gov>,
"kempf, donald (atr)" <donald.kempf@usdoj.gov>, "andrew.finch@usdoj.gov" <andrew.finch@usdoj.gov>, "sarah.isgur.flores@usdoj.gov"
<sarah.isgur.flores@usdoj.gov>, karen gould <gould@vsb.org>, james <bodie@vsb.org>, ned <davis@vsb.org>, kathryn <montgomery@vsb.org>, david
gogal <17036913913@myfax.com>, doris causey <doris@cvlas.org>, james whitener <invwhitener@gmail.com>, intakereb <intakereb@vsb.org>,
"dana.boente@fbi.gov" <dana.boente@fbi.gov>, renu brennan <brennan@vsb.org>, "shoenfeld, elizabeth" <shoenfeld@vsb.org>, christine corey
<corey@vsb.org>, brent saunders <saunders@vsb.org>, scott prince <prince@vsb.org>, jim mccauley <mccauley@vsb.org>, paulo franco
<franco@vsb.org>, katie uston <uston@vsb.org>, "dillon@vsb.org" <dillon@vsb.org>, mary martelino - vsb <martelino@vsb.org>, barbara saunders
<bsaunders@vsb.org>, "booberg, laura" <booberg@vsb.org>, cam moffatt <moffatt@vsb.org>, david fennessey vsb <fennesseyvsb@gmail.com>,
"sterling@vsb.org" <sterling@vsb.org>, david jackson <jackson@vsb.org>, ron mccall <mccall@vsb.org>, "marshall@vsb.org" <marshall@vsb.org>,
"powell@vsb.org" <powell@vsb.org>, vivian byrd <byrd@vsb.org>, "baker@vvsb.org" <baker@vvsb.org>, laurie fuller <fuller@vsb.org>, sylvia daniel
<daniel@vsb.org>, bonnie waldeck <waldeck@vsb.org>, vsb fax <18047750597@myfax.com>, virginia supreme court <18047866249@myfax.com>,
"guggenheim@vsb.org" <guggenheim@vsb.org>, "hedrick@vsb.org" <hedrick@vsb.org>
Cc: "rhettamdaniel@rhettaesq.com" <rhettamdaniel@rhettaesq.com>
To the Virginia State Bar:
My lawyer Retta Daniels forwarded to me an e-mail that once again had no STATUS UPDATE
Nowhere does this give a STATUS UPDATE or state where a lawyer who is not licensed in VIRGINIA can be
hired by a lawyer in VIRGINIA to create a document to use to DEFRAUD all the homeowners that such
document was used to sell properties now creating a cloud on their PROPERTY titles. The only way this
works is to use a JUDGE like JUDGE JAMES CLARK who was the TRUSTEE on all the loans.
JUDGE CLARK lost immunity when he illegally jailed me for BEN DIMURO and MICHEAL WEISER to collect
there illegally gotten legal fees which you seem to wish to ignore.
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ui=2&ik=9eb375e03c&jsver=CPly5ZWiTxk.en.&view=pt&msg=161e219dfbad7eca&search=inbox&siml=161e219dfba… 1/2
3/1/2018 Gmail - 2/17/18 - Notice as Counsel for Janice Wolk Grenadier VSB Complaints against Bernard J. DiMuro, Esquire, and Multiple Other Attorneys
I also have not had explained to me WHY you EMPOWER lawyers to lie in court and lie in court documents -
or to have ETHICS lawyers employed by you have documents sent to his HOME and not to his OFFICE and
then to THREATEN ME?
I understand that you have held other lawyers in other states accountable - I have spoken with and will be
forwarding them and there lawyers the facts that you PICK and CHOSE which LAWYERS by MONIES and
POWER whom you INVESTIGATE
1. AGAIN UPDATE the STATUS of WHERE COMPLAINTS are -
2. PROVIDE LAW used to allow lawyers not licensed in Virginia to PRACTICE law and create documents for
other POWERFUL and WEALTHY lawyers to use to STEAL REAL ESTATE and MONIES through there law
firm is legal?
3. WHERE FORGERY of a signature is used by a lawyer to further steal REAL ESTATE and MONIES is legal
through there law firm
4. Where a JUDGE to further illegally jail a victim to line the pockets of lawyers financially is legal
5. WHERE a lawyer who represented me / JWG is then legally allowed to represent the opposing side when
I have stated clearly I do not give permission for such representation
I am sure I will have other questions - but, I look forward to the answers to these - as do some of the VICTIMS
of the VSB
PLEASE TAKE NOTE ALL DOCUMENTS ARE NOT TO BE SHREDDED this includes any and all
documents, internal e-mails for subpoena purposes if need be.
That a response to me and my lawyer RHETTA DANIELS and others cc'd by 5 pm today. Thursday, March 1,
2018, especially the Lawyers form the Department of Justice and FBI agents and lawyer Dana Boenta and
please STOP all the BULLSHIT and do your jobs answer the above questions.
Thank you,
[Quoted text hidden]
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ui=2&ik=9eb375e03c&jsver=CPly5ZWiTxk.en.&view=pt&msg=161e219dfbad7eca&search=inbox&siml=161e219dfba… 2/2
Sent: Friday, March 9, 2018 5:57 PM
To: Bodie, James <Bodie@vsb.org>; Gould, Karen <Gould@vsb.org>; Davis, Ned <Davis@vsb.org>;
Montgomery, Kathryn <Montgomery@vsb.org>; Davis, Davida <ddavis@vsb.org>; david gogal
<17036913913@myfax.com>; doris causey <doris@cvlas.org>; james whitener
<invwhitener@gmail.com>; intakereb <intakereb@vsb.org>; McCauley, Jim <mccauley@vsb.org>;
Whistleblower (Judiciary-Rep) <whistleblower@judiciary-rep.senate.gov>; sarah.isgur.flores@usdoj.gov;
Human Rights FBI DOJ <hrsptips@usdoj.gov>; Wilson, Marcus H. (WF) (FBI) <marcus.wilson@ic.fbi.gov>;
Washington Field FBI Email <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>; NOVAPC <novapc@ic.fbi.gov>; Simon, Noah
andrew.finch@usdoj.gov; Rhetta M. Daniel <rhettamdaniel@rhettaesq.com>
Subject: Further Information of the Corruption and Collusion of Divorce Lawyer Ilona Grenadier
Heckman and her "GANG " of Lawyers et al
To Intake at VSB: On March 4, 2018 I field on line a

complaint against Ilona Ely Grenadier Heckman to
coordinate with the open Complaint from 2016 that has by
all appearance been ignored and myself and my attorney
Rhetta Daniels have received no updates of substance.
If you have any other questions I can be reached at 202-368-

7178
Please include the attached and following:
Virginia State Bar Complaint to be coordinated with Virginia State Bar Complaint of December
2016 that the past Virginia State Bar Complaints that the Law has been ignored and have
been acknowledged, that all letters denying investigation is criminal within the BAR and the
December 2016 Complaint is still open and being investigated by all appearance.
That ALL Lawyers should be held EQUALLY responsible for the CRIMINAL acts and
actions against Janice Wolk Grenadier. That they knew the Scheme by Divorce Lawyer Ilona
Grenadier Heckman and contributed to it. That they knew or should have had Knowledge of the
law and under the Professional Code of Ethics as listed below should have reported the Criminal
acts and actions of Judges and other lawyers, government employees and or Elected Officials
involved in the Cover Up by Divorce lawyer Ilona Grenadier Heckman who all acts and
actions were with Knowledgeable Intend.
The appearance is documents that should not have been shredded have been shredded by the
Virginia State Bar.
That NO update has been given and or documents shared with me or my lawyer Rhetta Daniels
as requested.
The following lawyers knew and collided with each other to Foreclose on 15 W. Spring Street,
Alexandria Virginia.
This process was through illegally gotten legal fees “ORDERED” by Judge James Clark the
Trustee on all loans from properties and monies stolen from Janice by Divorce Lawyer Ilona
Grenadier Heckman and David Mark Grenadier. Judge James Clark was a trustee on
a past loan on 15 W. Spring Street. The properties and monies were stolen through a forged
Trust Amendment and a Liquidation Agreement of Real Estate done without my signature and
by Lawyer Neil Gurvitch at Selzer Gurvitch Rabin & Obecny Chartered.
The law firms in the foreclosure of illegally gotten legal fees include DiMuroGinsberg,
Michael Weiser Esq., Parker, Simon & Kokolis, LLC, Troutman Sanders aka Mays &
Valentine, Wade Grimes Friedman Meinken & Leischner, PLLC,
This process is now though OCWEN Servicing on fraudulent documents done by Joe Simmons
claiming to be a lawyer under BAR No. 1079 that belongs to Judge Donald R. Alexander ( that
2 other examples are attached with 2 other bar No’s). The law firms include Hunoval, BWW
Law Group, McCabe Weisberg & Conway, Brock & Scott, Troutman Sanders aka
Mays & Valentine,
Virginia State Bar complaints can not be against law firms but be against agents / lawyers of the
law firm - so a complaint has been filed or will be filed against the people who have signed
documents have knowledge of the documents being fradulunt with includes and is not limited to
the information that the Virginia State Bar already has on file in its dropbox link:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/607yc93nyb85f52/Files%20requested%20by%20Janice%20Wolk%
20Grenadier.pdf?dl=0
That all information already filed should be included with each complaint and no more
documents should be shredded by the Virginia State Bar.
That all lawyers that have and are involved in this are POWERFUL firms that all are friends and
colleagues with Divorce Lawyer Ilona Grenadier Heckman and favor by all appearance with
her lawyer Ben DiMuro past president and who has been very vocal in his arrangement with his
wife to donate 10% of his Estate to the Virginia State Bar. That by appearance and the way the
Bar ignores the criminal acts and actions of these powerful law firms should be looked at as
Bribery by all appearance. “The Appearance of Justice is Just as Important as Justice Itself”
Lawyers:
Please Note a separate Complaint is filed on each one:
Bernard Joseph DiMuro

Judge John Tran
Andrea Lynn Moseley
DiMuro Ginsberg, P.C.
1101 King St Ste 610
703-684-4333
Hillary J. Collyer
Lasher Holzapfel Sperry & Ebberson
PRINCIPAL
collyer@lasher.com
(206) 838-2895
Ilona Ely (Freedman) Grenadier
Heather Jenquine
Lisa Levi
Arlene Starace
Ben Duffett
Grenadier, Starace, Duffett & Levi, P.C.
649 S Washington St
Alexandria, VA 22314-4109
Phone: 703-683-9000
Michael Jay Weiser

Suite 416
510 King Street
703-836-7003
Neil Gurvitch
Selzer Gurvitch Rabin & Obecny Chartered
Selzer Gurvitch
4416 East West Hwy 4th FL
Bethesda, MD 20814
301-634-3172
Heba Kristina Carter

Craig A. Parker
Parker, Simon & Kokolis, LLC
110 N Washington St, Rockville, MD 20850
(301) 656-5775
S. Mohsin Reza
Mary Catherine Zinsner
Troutman Sanders LLP
1850 Towers Crescent Plaza Ste 500
Tysons Corner, VA 22182
703-734-4363
mohsin.reza@troutman.com
Kermit A. Rosenberg Jr
Bailey & Ehrenberg PLLC
1015 18th Street NW
Washington DC 20036
202-350-4670
Ann Schmidt aka Louise Anna Schmidt

Reed Smith
2025 Turtle Pond Dr
Reston VA 20191
703-391-9360
Howard Norman Bierman

Allison Melton
BWW Law Group
702 North Irving St
Arlington, VA 22201
301-961-6555 ext. 3358
Foster Samuel Burton Friedman

Wade, Grimes, Friedman, Meinken & Leischner, PLLC
616 N Washington St
703-836-9030
Brian Lawrence Campbell

Thomas E. Brock
Gregory A. Scott
Brock & Scott PLLC
5431 Oleander Dr
Wilmington, NC 28403
910-392-4988
McCabe Weisberg & Conway

TERRENCE J. McCABE - Pennsylvania, New Jersey and New York
MARC S. WEISBERG - Pennsylvania and New York
EDWARD D. CONWAY - Pennsylvania
ABBY K. MOYNIHAN - Massachusetts in 2008, the District of Columbia in 2009, Virginia in 2010
and Maryland in 2015.
312 Marshall Avenue Suite 800
Laurel, MD 20707
301-490-3361
That the paper that Brock & Scott and or OCWEN has as no value. It has less value the
toilet paper you use to wipe after you shit. That they have no STANDING and all lawyers have
professional knowledge of it. Part of the Scheme spelled out:
The key element of the paper strategy has been to create the illusion of transfers of assets, thus
supporting the erroneous narrative that with all those parties purchasing the loans, a lot of due
diligence MUST have been done and therefore the screaming defense of homeowners (attacking
ownership) is nothing but a dilatory stall tactic.
What is consistently missed, even by people who are completely fed up with the banks and
regulatory agencies that have given a wink and nod at plainly fraudulent practices, is that the
only "asset" is the paper, and that the debt itself has never moved. In a true securitization the
debt would indeed be transferred. But all claims of securitization of debt that are based upon
CLAIMS of ownership rather than the ownership itself are groundless. Thus neither Vulture
Firms nor any of their predecessors ever owned the debt.
This is why we have lawyers go to law schools. Such convoluted schemes are not easily
deciphered without experts and lawyers. Lawyers understand the distinction between the debt,
the note and the mortgage. But lawyers forget and lay people never knew about the distinction. It
isn't technical. It is all about keeping transactions on paper honest.
And right now nearly all of the hundreds of millions of documents are being used around the
world to foreclose, or support the sale of the paper note and mortgage and derivatives based
upon the value of those millions of documents containing false recitations and inferences of fact.
So borrowers, whether their payments (to the wrong party) are "current" or not, like the one in
the story found in the link below are stuck in the very place that legislators and regulators have
said could never happen in a legal mortgage lending situation: no knowledge about the identity
of the obligee of the debt. Foreclosure defense lawyers who win cases punch holes in the
foreclosure case simply by knowing they are not dealing with anyone who owns the debt nor
anyone who is representing the obligee in the underlying debt (i.e., the real world).
The pattern and practice of the below lawyers with the NEW documents and the NEW evidence
just learned though Wells Fargo Bank, Bank of America and investigation into OCWEN ROBO
signers. The following is realized and supports the evidence that Janice showed and pointed out
to OCWEN and the lawyers and or there lawyer representatives:
1. That the Affidavit of Lost Assignment filed against 15 W. Spring St. by OCWEN states
clearly that it was done by: Prepared By: Joe Simmons, OCWEN Loan Servicing,
LLC, 1661 Worthington Road, Suite 100, West Palm Beach, Florida 33409, (561) 682-
8000, 52714331246563, Attorney Code: 01079 BR
2. That the above Attorney Code belongs to JUDGE Donald R. Alexander
3. Joe Simmons is not a licensed attorney. See Exhibit 12 and other Barcodes he has
used
4. Further Joe Simmons title with OCWEN according to Linkedin is: Corporate Consultant
Results Coach Strategy Trainer and or Process Lender-Document Execution /
5. That lawyers and Judges can not say there was an error as MANY other examples with
fake Attorney No. are attached as examples Exhibit to show the pattern and
practice of deceit by all. Exhibit 12
6. Evette Morales with McCabe Weisberg & Conway claimed to have Power of Attorney
for Wells Fargo Bank while Carrie is the Notary Exhibit 4
7. Evette Morales is the Notary with Brock and Scott for who claims to have a Power of
Attorney for Wells Fargo Bank While Marlene Saunders is the POA Exhibit 3
8. Wells Fargo Bank in taped conversation https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ol0n-
EDveLk&t=477s states clearly no loan on 15 W. Spring St. Wells Fargo further
stated to the CFPB they had no loan on 15 W. Spring St.
9. Bank of America aka LaSalle Bank states clearly to CFPB and to JWG no loan against 15
W. Spring St.
10. Freddie Mac states clearly no loan against 15 W. Spring St. Exhibit 1
11. Fannie Mae states clearly no loan against 15 W. Spring St. Exhibit 1
12. All three of JWG’s Credit reports state there is no loan in her name against 15 W. Spring
St. upon request
13. OCWEN CLAIMS that Wells Fargo Bank is the owner of the loan - OCWEN when they
took over as Servicers gave the alleged loan a New No. ignoring the Modification -
OCWEN by all appearance started the SCHEME with the NEW aledge loan No.
creating a loan with at the value of the 1st loan. Further with all other Servicers I was
never able to get an accounting. This gave OCWEN the opportunity to MAKE UP
AN ACCOUNTING which is wrong.
14. The Trustee in Bankruptcy states clearly there is no right for anyone to attack 15 W.
Spring St for a loan
15. That the below lawyers were involved in and Covered Up the collusion to steal over $20
Million in Real Estate and monies by Divorce Lawyer Ilona Grenadier Heckman with a
Liquidation Agreement done by a lawyer not Licensed in Virginia Neil Gurvitch
- Exhibit 15
16. OCWEN represents in all Documents and in taped conversations that they are not the
owner of any loan against 15 W. Spring St. but, Wells Fargo Bank is whom they are
serving a loan for - AGAIN Wells Fargo Bank states clearly they have no such loan.
17. That the 1st two Affidavits against the home include Wells Fargo, Bank of America aka
LaSalle Bank and show the loan on two - three Bank Balance Sheets at the same time.
Exhibit 9
18. Other documents filed with the court and lawyers are aware of such documents - have
ignored them.
19. That ROBO signers for the first two are from 60 minutes expose: Ron Meharp, Tywana
Thomas, Linda Green, Cheryl Denise Thomas, Korel Harp and Brittany Snow Exhibit 9
20. The ROBO signers for OCWEN consists of: pass em Exhibits 3, 4, 6, 7, 11, 12
21. The ROBO signers for OCWEN are titled mostly Contract Management Coordinator but,
they use all different TITLEs and Bar Code Nos without being lawyers
22. That requests to lawyers and OCWEN directly by JWG, through Attorney General
of Virginia Mark Herring's office and through the CFPB for documents such as there
Service Agreement, the Power of Attorney giving the ROBO signers the rights to sign for
15 W. Spring St. and any and all documents that would show any rights or STANDING
to Foreclose have been denied. Exhibit 14
23. That BWW Law Group attempted to foreclose by Howard Bierman whose signature
was forged several times. That Howard Bierman by all appearance did this as favor for
Ben DiMuro who represented him in a Virginia State Bar Complaint. Exhibit 8
24. That BWW Law Group’s name was Bierman Geesing Ward & Wood until Geesing lost
license for exactly what Howard Bierman did here as shown in Exhibit
25. Ben DiMuro is Past President of the Virginia State Bar and has donated 10% of his and
his wife;s estate to the Virginia State Bar - giving him the Power to have the Virginia
State Bar Cover Up and ignore complaints of those of Power and Money.
26. Ben DiMuro represented JWG prior and now without her permission violating the
Professional Code of Ethics represent Divorce Lawyer Ilona Grenadier Heckman
colluding with her and others to STEAL from JWG with the Liquidation Agreement that
was done by a lawyer not licensed in Virginia and without JWG’s signature.
27. Ilona Grenadier Heckman sold several properties with JWG’s signature and has created a
cloud on several titles of Real Property throughout the City of Alexandria, Exhibit 15
28. That the appearance is that BWW Law Group aka Bierman Geesing Ward & Wood ,
McCabe Weisberg & Conway, Parker, Simon & Kokolis, LLC, Troutman Sanders
aka Mays & Valentine, Brock and Scott et al are no different than Friedman &
McFadden and or Shapiro & Burson considered Foreclosure Mills and finally closed.
29. That as a lay person for me to know the law better than the above law firms who should
know the law and have a fiduciary responsibility to follow the law and to enforce and
report the corruption. Oh ya - that is the pattern and practice of lawyers today.
30. That all lawyers and or law firms colluded with knowledgeable INTENT to maliciously
use False imprisonment, Intentional infliction of emotional distress, Transferred
intent, Conversion, With Negligence: Duty of / standard of care, Calculus of
negligence, Rescue doctrine, Duty to rescue, Negligent infliction of emotional distress,
Entrustment, Malpractice legal, Proximate cause, Res ipsa loquitur, Defamation,
Invasion of privacy, Breach of Confidence, Abuse of process, Malicious prosecution,
Criminal Conversation, Breach of promise, Fraud, Tortious interference, Conspiracy,
Torts and conflict of laws, Joint and several liability, Perjury,
31. The damages are Exemplary damages and all should be punished to make an example
of the wrongdoers in order to deter others from the sae wrongful conduct. The defendant's
willful acts were malicious, violent, oppressive, fraudulent, wanton or grossly reckless.
Links to Videos that show the Corruption:
OCWEN Wells Fargo BWW you tube Links Sept 2017
Wells Fargo https://youtu.be/ol0n-EDveLk

OCWEN No 4 Legal Brenda video 12m34s webcamera io https://youtu.be/qXIy54bvCIo
8 11 2017 OCWEN No 3 video 34m10s webcamera io https://youtu.be/iwMIBXHWtj8
OCWEN 2 Video Fri 8011 2017 video 39m22s webcamera io
https://youtu.be/SKZtWosXiUk
OCWEN 8 11 2017 video 10m15s webcamera io https://youtu.be/EUenT0aKsHk
Emily Wells Fargo 8 10 2017 video 27m50s webcamera io Wells Fargo
https://youtu.be/ol0n-EDveLk
OCWEN 8 9 2017 video 26m26s webcamera io https://youtu.be/ZU_JP9w5sDQ
JWG Spring St Feb 2013 2 BWW Law Group https://youtu.be/NePveOTCupE
Other Links and Videos can me found on YouTube jwgrenadier@gmail.com and

VSB Professional Code of Ethics Violated by the above:

Knowledgeable intent of lawyers to ignore the Professional Code of Ethics and Empower
Criminal Activity Violations
RULE 1.1 Competence
RULE 1.2 Scope of Representation
RULE 1.3 Diligence
RULE 1.4 Communication
RULE 1.5 Fees
RULE 1.6 Confidentiality of Information
RULE 1.7 Conflict of Interest: General Rule
RULE 1.8 Conflict of Interest: Prohibited Transactions
RULE 1.9 Conflict of Interest: Former Client
RULE 1.10 Imputed Disqualification: General Rule
RULE 1.15 Safekeeping Property
RULE 1.16 Declining Or Terminating Representation
RULE 3.1 Meritorious Claims And Contentions
RULE 3.3 Candor Toward The Tribunal
RULE 3.4 Fairness To Opposing Party And Counsel
RULE 3.5 Impartiality And Decorum Of The Tribunal
RULE 3.6 Trial Publicity
RULE 3.7 Lawyer As Witness
RULE 4.1 Truthfulness In Statements To Others
RULE 4.2 Communication With Persons Represented By Counsel
RULE 4.3 Dealing With Unrepresented Persons
RULE 4.4 Respect For Rights Of Third Persons
RULE 5.1 Responsibilities Of Partners And Supervisory Lawyers
RULE 5.3 Responsibilities Regarding Nonlawyer Assistants .
RULE 5.4 Professional Independence Of A Lawyer
RULE 5.5 Unauthorized Practice Of Law; Multijurisdictional Practice of Law.
MAINTAINING THE INTEGRITY OF THE PROFESSION . . . . .
RULE 8.1 Bar Admission And Disciplinary Matters
RULE 8.2 Judicial Officials .RULE 8.3 Reporting Misconduct .
RULE 8.4 Misconduct
RULE 8.5 Disciplinary Authority; Choice Of Law
State and Federal Laws Violated along with other laws:
Intentional Fraudulent Transfer of Real Estate and Money and for the recovery of money and
Real Estate stolen
U.S. constitution Article 11 Section 4
Constructive Fraudulent transfer of Real Estate with knowledgeable INTEND
Conversion
Collusion
Malicious Prosecution
Obstruction of Justice
Alter Ego
Violations of Civil Rights Act of 1871 (42 USC § 1983, 1985, 1986)
Racketeering and Corrupt Organizations Act of 1970 (18 USC § 1962)
Libel and Slander
False Imprisonment
Turnover of Property SOLD / and or Still Collecting Rents as Trustee
Fraud on the Court by Lawyers
Criminal Activity Violations 1.6, 3.3, 8.0 -8.5,
Perjury by lawyers in Court, in Court documents
Breach of Contract
Breach of Duty
Virginia and United States of America Constitution violations as a pattern and practice
18 USC § 371 Conspiracy

18 USC § 1341 Frauds and Swindles
18 USC § 1343 Fraud by Wire,
18 USC §1344 Bank Fraud
18 USC §1346 Honest Services
18 USC § 1348 Securities and commodities fraud
18 USC §1349 Attempt and Conspiracy Sarbanes – Oxley Act
18 U.S. Code § 666 - Theft or bribery concerning programs receiving Federal funds
15 U.S. Code Subchapter V - DEBT COLLECTION PRACTICES § 1692d - Harassment or

abuse § 1692e -False or misleading representations § 1692f - Unfair practices § 1692g -
Validation of debt § 1692j - Furnishing certain deceptive forms Fair Debt. Collection Act
(FDCPA) § 806 Harassment, § 807 False and misleading, § 808 Unfair practices, § 809
Validation of debts, § 812 Furnishing deceptive forms, et al
31 U.S.C. § 3729 Federal False Claims Act Violation of the Consent Order in 2014 with the DOJ
and 48 states including Virginia.
CFPB has filed new suit USDC Southern District of Florida West Palm Beach Div Case No. 9:17
– cv-80495
Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi has also a new suit filed against OCWEN and Judge
Donald Alexander has stated she is his counsel in this matter through his Judges Chambers
Theft by deceptive taking

Illegal Conversion of Real Estate
Exhibit 1- 3 EPSON110.PDF
Exhibit 4 EPSON111.PDF
Exhibit 6 - 7 EPSON113.PDF
Final for E Virginia State Bar Complaint to be ...

Warmly,
--
JW Grenadier
popular opposition, shame, scandal, discouragement, or personal loss
Sent: Friday, March 9, 2018 5:57 PM
To: Bodie, James <Bodie@vsb.org>; Gould, Karen <Gould@vsb.org>; Davis, Ned <Davis@vsb.org>;
Montgomery, Kathryn <Montgomery@vsb.org>; Davis, Davida <ddavis@vsb.org>; david gogal
<17036913913@myfax.com>; doris causey <doris@cvlas.org>; james whitener
<invwhitener@gmail.com>; intakereb <intakereb@vsb.org>; McCauley, Jim <mccauley@vsb.org>;
Whistleblower (Judiciary-Rep) <whistleblower@judiciary-rep.senate.gov>; sarah.isgur.flores@usdoj.gov;
Human Rights FBI DOJ <hrsptips@usdoj.gov>; Wilson, Marcus H. (WF) (FBI) <marcus.wilson@ic.fbi.gov>;
Washington Field FBI Email <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>; NOVAPC <novapc@ic.fbi.gov>; Simon, Noah
andrew.finch@usdoj.gov; Rhetta M. Daniel <rhettamdaniel@rhettaesq.com>
Subject: Further Information of the Corruption and Collusion of Divorce Lawyer Ilona Grenadier
Heckman and her "GANG " of Lawyers et al
To Intake at VSB: On March 4, 2018 I field on line a

complaint against Ilona Ely Grenadier Heckman to
coordinate with the open Complaint from 2016 that has by
all appearance been ignored and myself and my attorney
Rhetta Daniels have received no updates of substance.
If you have any other questions I can be reached at 202-368-

7178
Please include the attached and following:
Virginia State Bar Complaint to be coordinated with Virginia State Bar Complaint of December
2016 that the past Virginia State Bar Complaints that the Law has been ignored and have
been acknowledged, that all letters denying investigation is criminal within the BAR and the
December 2016 Complaint is still open and being investigated by all appearance.
That ALL Lawyers should be held EQUALLY responsible for the CRIMINAL acts and
actions against Janice Wolk Grenadier. That they knew the Scheme by Divorce Lawyer Ilona
Grenadier Heckman and contributed to it. That they knew or should have had Knowledge of the
law and under the Professional Code of Ethics as listed below should have reported the Criminal
acts and actions of Judges and other lawyers, government employees and or Elected Officials
involved in the Cover Up by Divorce lawyer Ilona Grenadier Heckman who all acts and
actions were with Knowledgeable Intend.
The appearance is documents that should not have been shredded have been shredded by the
Virginia State Bar.
That NO update has been given and or documents shared with me or my lawyer Rhetta Daniels
as requested.
The following lawyers knew and collided with each other to Foreclose on 15 W. Spring Street,
Alexandria Virginia.
This process was through illegally gotten legal fees “ORDERED” by Judge James Clark the
Trustee on all loans from properties and monies stolen from Janice by Divorce Lawyer Ilona
Grenadier Heckman and David Mark Grenadier. Judge James Clark was a trustee on
a past loan on 15 W. Spring Street. The properties and monies were stolen through a forged
Trust Amendment and a Liquidation Agreement of Real Estate done without my signature and
by Lawyer Neil Gurvitch at Selzer Gurvitch Rabin & Obecny Chartered.
The law firms in the foreclosure of illegally gotten legal fees include DiMuroGinsberg,
Michael Weiser Esq., Parker, Simon & Kokolis, LLC, Troutman Sanders aka Mays &
Valentine, Wade Grimes Friedman Meinken & Leischner, PLLC,
This process is now though OCWEN Servicing on fraudulent documents done by Joe Simmons
claiming to be a lawyer under BAR No. 1079 that belongs to Judge Donald R. Alexander ( that
2 other examples are attached with 2 other bar No’s). The law firms include Hunoval, BWW
Law Group, McCabe Weisberg & Conway, Brock & Scott, Troutman Sanders aka
Mays & Valentine,
Virginia State Bar complaints can not be against law firms but be against agents / lawyers of the
law firm - so a complaint has been filed or will be filed against the people who have signed
documents have knowledge of the documents being fradulunt with includes and is not limited to
the information that the Virginia State Bar already has on file in its dropbox link:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/607yc93nyb85f52/Files%20requested%20by%20Janice%20Wolk%
20Grenadier.pdf?dl=0
That all information already filed should be included with each complaint and no more
documents should be shredded by the Virginia State Bar.
That all lawyers that have and are involved in this are POWERFUL firms that all are friends and
colleagues with Divorce Lawyer Ilona Grenadier Heckman and favor by all appearance with
her lawyer Ben DiMuro past president and who has been very vocal in his arrangement with his
wife to donate 10% of his Estate to the Virginia State Bar. That by appearance and the way the
Bar ignores the criminal acts and actions of these powerful law firms should be looked at as
Bribery by all appearance. “The Appearance of Justice is Just as Important as Justice Itself”
Lawyers:
Please Note a separate Complaint is filed on each one:
Bernard Joseph DiMuro

Judge John Tran
Andrea Lynn Moseley
DiMuro Ginsberg, P.C.
1101 King St Ste 610
703-684-4333
Hillary J. Collyer
Lasher Holzapfel Sperry & Ebberson
PRINCIPAL
collyer@lasher.com
(206) 838-2895
Ilona Ely (Freedman) Grenadier
Heather Jenquine
Lisa Levi
Arlene Starace
Ben Duffett
Grenadier, Starace, Duffett & Levi, P.C.
649 S Washington St
Alexandria, VA 22314-4109
Phone: 703-683-9000
Michael Jay Weiser

Suite 416
510 King Street
703-836-7003
Neil Gurvitch
Selzer Gurvitch Rabin & Obecny Chartered
Selzer Gurvitch
4416 East West Hwy 4th FL
Bethesda, MD 20814
301-634-3172
Heba Kristina Carter

Craig A. Parker
Parker, Simon & Kokolis, LLC
110 N Washington St, Rockville, MD 20850
(301) 656-5775
S. Mohsin Reza
Mary Catherine Zinsner
Troutman Sanders LLP
1850 Towers Crescent Plaza Ste 500
Tysons Corner, VA 22182
703-734-4363
mohsin.reza@troutman.com
Kermit A. Rosenberg Jr
Bailey & Ehrenberg PLLC
1015 18th Street NW
Washington DC 20036
202-350-4670
Ann Schmidt aka Louise Anna Schmidt

Reed Smith
2025 Turtle Pond Dr
Reston VA 20191
703-391-9360
Howard Norman Bierman

Allison Melton
BWW Law Group
702 North Irving St
Arlington, VA 22201
301-961-6555 ext. 3358
Foster Samuel Burton Friedman

Wade, Grimes, Friedman, Meinken & Leischner, PLLC
616 N Washington St
703-836-9030
Brian Lawrence Campbell

Thomas E. Brock
Gregory A. Scott
Brock & Scott PLLC
5431 Oleander Dr
Wilmington, NC 28403
910-392-4988
McCabe Weisberg & Conway

TERRENCE J. McCABE - Pennsylvania, New Jersey and New York
MARC S. WEISBERG - Pennsylvania and New York
EDWARD D. CONWAY - Pennsylvania
ABBY K. MOYNIHAN - Massachusetts in 2008, the District of Columbia in 2009, Virginia in 2010
and Maryland in 2015.
312 Marshall Avenue Suite 800
Laurel, MD 20707
301-490-3361
That the paper that Brock & Scott and or OCWEN has as no value. It has less value the
toilet paper you use to wipe after you shit. That they have no STANDING and all lawyers have
professional knowledge of it. Part of the Scheme spelled out:
The key element of the paper strategy has been to create the illusion of transfers of assets, thus
supporting the erroneous narrative that with all those parties purchasing the loans, a lot of due
diligence MUST have been done and therefore the screaming defense of homeowners (attacking
ownership) is nothing but a dilatory stall tactic.
What is consistently missed, even by people who are completely fed up with the banks and
regulatory agencies that have given a wink and nod at plainly fraudulent practices, is that the
only "asset" is the paper, and that the debt itself has never moved. In a true securitization the
debt would indeed be transferred. But all claims of securitization of debt that are based upon
CLAIMS of ownership rather than the ownership itself are groundless. Thus neither Vulture
Firms nor any of their predecessors ever owned the debt.
This is why we have lawyers go to law schools. Such convoluted schemes are not easily
deciphered without experts and lawyers. Lawyers understand the distinction between the debt,
the note and the mortgage. But lawyers forget and lay people never knew about the distinction. It
isn't technical. It is all about keeping transactions on paper honest.
And right now nearly all of the hundreds of millions of documents are being used around the
world to foreclose, or support the sale of the paper note and mortgage and derivatives based
upon the value of those millions of documents containing false recitations and inferences of fact.
So borrowers, whether their payments (to the wrong party) are "current" or not, like the one in
the story found in the link below are stuck in the very place that legislators and regulators have
said could never happen in a legal mortgage lending situation: no knowledge about the identity
of the obligee of the debt. Foreclosure defense lawyers who win cases punch holes in the
foreclosure case simply by knowing they are not dealing with anyone who owns the debt nor
anyone who is representing the obligee in the underlying debt (i.e., the real world).
The pattern and practice of the below lawyers with the NEW documents and the NEW evidence
just learned though Wells Fargo Bank, Bank of America and investigation into OCWEN ROBO
signers. The following is realized and supports the evidence that Janice showed and pointed out
to OCWEN and the lawyers and or there lawyer representatives:
1. That the Affidavit of Lost Assignment filed against 15 W. Spring St. by OCWEN states
clearly that it was done by: Prepared By: Joe Simmons, OCWEN Loan Servicing,
LLC, 1661 Worthington Road, Suite 100, West Palm Beach, Florida 33409, (561) 682-
8000, 52714331246563, Attorney Code: 01079 BR
2. That the above Attorney Code belongs to JUDGE Donald R. Alexander
3. Joe Simmons is not a licensed attorney. See Exhibit 12 and other Barcodes he has
used
4. Further Joe Simmons title with OCWEN according to Linkedin is: Corporate Consultant
Results Coach Strategy Trainer and or Process Lender-Document Execution /
5. That lawyers and Judges can not say there was an error as MANY other examples with
fake Attorney No. are attached as examples Exhibit to show the pattern and
practice of deceit by all. Exhibit 12
6. Evette Morales with McCabe Weisberg & Conway claimed to have Power of Attorney
for Wells Fargo Bank while Carrie is the Notary Exhibit 4
7. Evette Morales is the Notary with Brock and Scott for who claims to have a Power of
Attorney for Wells Fargo Bank While Marlene Saunders is the POA Exhibit 3
8. Wells Fargo Bank in taped conversation https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ol0n-
EDveLk&t=477s states clearly no loan on 15 W. Spring St. Wells Fargo further
stated to the CFPB they had no loan on 15 W. Spring St.
9. Bank of America aka LaSalle Bank states clearly to CFPB and to JWG no loan against 15
W. Spring St.
10. Freddie Mac states clearly no loan against 15 W. Spring St. Exhibit 1
11. Fannie Mae states clearly no loan against 15 W. Spring St. Exhibit 1
12. All three of JWG’s Credit reports state there is no loan in her name against 15 W. Spring
St. upon request
13. OCWEN CLAIMS that Wells Fargo Bank is the owner of the loan - OCWEN when they
took over as Servicers gave the alleged loan a New No. ignoring the Modification -
OCWEN by all appearance started the SCHEME with the NEW aledge loan No.
creating a loan with at the value of the 1st loan. Further with all other Servicers I was
never able to get an accounting. This gave OCWEN the opportunity to MAKE UP
AN ACCOUNTING which is wrong.
14. The Trustee in Bankruptcy states clearly there is no right for anyone to attack 15 W.
Spring St for a loan
15. That the below lawyers were involved in and Covered Up the collusion to steal over $20
Million in Real Estate and monies by Divorce Lawyer Ilona Grenadier Heckman with a
Liquidation Agreement done by a lawyer not Licensed in Virginia Neil Gurvitch
- Exhibit 15
16. OCWEN represents in all Documents and in taped conversations that they are not the
owner of any loan against 15 W. Spring St. but, Wells Fargo Bank is whom they are
serving a loan for - AGAIN Wells Fargo Bank states clearly they have no such loan.
17. That the 1st two Affidavits against the home include Wells Fargo, Bank of America aka
LaSalle Bank and show the loan on two - three Bank Balance Sheets at the same time.
Exhibit 9
18. Other documents filed with the court and lawyers are aware of such documents - have
ignored them.
19. That ROBO signers for the first two are from 60 minutes expose: Ron Meharp, Tywana
Thomas, Linda Green, Cheryl Denise Thomas, Korel Harp and Brittany Snow Exhibit 9
20. The ROBO signers for OCWEN consists of: pass em Exhibits 3, 4, 6, 7, 11, 12
21. The ROBO signers for OCWEN are titled mostly Contract Management Coordinator but,
they use all different TITLEs and Bar Code Nos without being lawyers
22. That requests to lawyers and OCWEN directly by JWG, through Attorney General
of Virginia Mark Herring's office and through the CFPB for documents such as there
Service Agreement, the Power of Attorney giving the ROBO signers the rights to sign for
15 W. Spring St. and any and all documents that would show any rights or STANDING
to Foreclose have been denied. Exhibit 14
23. That BWW Law Group attempted to foreclose by Howard Bierman whose signature
was forged several times. That Howard Bierman by all appearance did this as favor for
Ben DiMuro who represented him in a Virginia State Bar Complaint. Exhibit 8
24. That BWW Law Group’s name was Bierman Geesing Ward & Wood until Geesing lost
license for exactly what Howard Bierman did here as shown in Exhibit
25. Ben DiMuro is Past President of the Virginia State Bar and has donated 10% of his and
his wife;s estate to the Virginia State Bar - giving him the Power to have the Virginia
State Bar Cover Up and ignore complaints of those of Power and Money.
26. Ben DiMuro represented JWG prior and now without her permission violating the
Professional Code of Ethics represent Divorce Lawyer Ilona Grenadier Heckman
colluding with her and others to STEAL from JWG with the Liquidation Agreement that
was done by a lawyer not licensed in Virginia and without JWG’s signature.
27. Ilona Grenadier Heckman sold several properties with JWG’s signature and has created a
cloud on several titles of Real Property throughout the City of Alexandria, Exhibit 15
28. That the appearance is that BWW Law Group aka Bierman Geesing Ward & Wood ,
McCabe Weisberg & Conway, Parker, Simon & Kokolis, LLC, Troutman Sanders
aka Mays & Valentine, Brock and Scott et al are no different than Friedman &
McFadden and or Shapiro & Burson considered Foreclosure Mills and finally closed.
29. That as a lay person for me to know the law better than the above law firms who should
know the law and have a fiduciary responsibility to follow the law and to enforce and
report the corruption. Oh ya - that is the pattern and practice of lawyers today.
30. That all lawyers and or law firms colluded with knowledgeable INTENT to maliciously
use False imprisonment, Intentional infliction of emotional distress, Transferred
intent, Conversion, With Negligence: Duty of / standard of care, Calculus of
negligence, Rescue doctrine, Duty to rescue, Negligent infliction of emotional distress,
Entrustment, Malpractice legal, Proximate cause, Res ipsa loquitur, Defamation,
Invasion of privacy, Breach of Confidence, Abuse of process, Malicious prosecution,
Criminal Conversation, Breach of promise, Fraud, Tortious interference, Conspiracy,
Torts and conflict of laws, Joint and several liability, Perjury,
31. The damages are Exemplary damages and all should be punished to make an example
of the wrongdoers in order to deter others from the sae wrongful conduct. The defendant's
willful acts were malicious, violent, oppressive, fraudulent, wanton or grossly reckless.
Links to Videos that show the Corruption:
OCWEN Wells Fargo BWW you tube Links Sept 2017
Wells Fargo https://youtu.be/ol0n-EDveLk

OCWEN No 4 Legal Brenda video 12m34s webcamera io https://youtu.be/qXIy54bvCIo
8 11 2017 OCWEN No 3 video 34m10s webcamera io https://youtu.be/iwMIBXHWtj8
OCWEN 2 Video Fri 8011 2017 video 39m22s webcamera io
https://youtu.be/SKZtWosXiUk
OCWEN 8 11 2017 video 10m15s webcamera io https://youtu.be/EUenT0aKsHk
Emily Wells Fargo 8 10 2017 video 27m50s webcamera io Wells Fargo
https://youtu.be/ol0n-EDveLk
OCWEN 8 9 2017 video 26m26s webcamera io https://youtu.be/ZU_JP9w5sDQ
JWG Spring St Feb 2013 2 BWW Law Group https://youtu.be/NePveOTCupE
Other Links and Videos can me found on YouTube jwgrenadier@gmail.com and

VSB Professional Code of Ethics Violated by the above:

Criminal Activity Violations
RULE 1.1 Competence
RULE 1.2 Scope of Representation
RULE 1.3 Diligence
RULE 1.4 Communication
RULE 1.5 Fees
RULE 1.6 Confidentiality of Information
RULE 1.7 Conflict of Interest: General Rule
RULE 1.8 Conflict of Interest: Prohibited Transactions
RULE 1.9 Conflict of Interest: Former Client
RULE 1.10 Imputed Disqualification: General Rule
RULE 1.15 Safekeeping Property
RULE 1.16 Declining Or Terminating Representation
RULE 3.1 Meritorious Claims And Contentions
RULE 3.3 Candor Toward The Tribunal
RULE 3.4 Fairness To Opposing Party And Counsel
RULE 3.5 Impartiality And Decorum Of The Tribunal
RULE 3.6 Trial Publicity
RULE 3.7 Lawyer As Witness
RULE 4.1 Truthfulness In Statements To Others
RULE 4.2 Communication With Persons Represented By Counsel
RULE 4.3 Dealing With Unrepresented Persons
RULE 4.4 Respect For Rights Of Third Persons
RULE 5.1 Responsibilities Of Partners And Supervisory Lawyers
RULE 5.3 Responsibilities Regarding Nonlawyer Assistants .
RULE 5.4 Professional Independence Of A Lawyer
RULE 5.5 Unauthorized Practice Of Law; Multijurisdictional Practice of Law.
MAINTAINING THE INTEGRITY OF THE PROFESSION . . . . .
RULE 8.1 Bar Admission And Disciplinary Matters
RULE 8.2 Judicial Officials .RULE 8.3 Reporting Misconduct .
RULE 8.4 Misconduct
RULE 8.5 Disciplinary Authority; Choice Of Law
State and Federal Laws Violated along with other laws:
Intentional Fraudulent Transfer of Real Estate and Money and for the recovery of money and
Real Estate stolen
U.S. constitution Article 11 Section 4
Constructive Fraudulent transfer of Real Estate with knowledgeable INTEND
Conversion
Collusion
Malicious Prosecution
Obstruction of Justice
Alter Ego
Violations of Civil Rights Act of 1871 (42 USC § 1983, 1985, 1986)
Racketeering and Corrupt Organizations Act of 1970 (18 USC § 1962)
Libel and Slander
False Imprisonment
Turnover of Property SOLD / and or Still Collecting Rents as Trustee
Fraud on the Court by Lawyers
Criminal Activity Violations 1.6, 3.3, 8.0 -8.5,
Perjury by lawyers in Court, in Court documents
Breach of Contract
Breach of Duty
Virginia and United States of America Constitution violations as a pattern and practice
18 USC § 371 Conspiracy

18 USC § 1341 Frauds and Swindles
18 USC § 1343 Fraud by Wire,
18 USC §1344 Bank Fraud
18 USC §1346 Honest Services
18 USC § 1348 Securities and commodities fraud
18 USC §1349 Attempt and Conspiracy Sarbanes – Oxley Act
18 U.S. Code § 666 - Theft or bribery concerning programs receiving Federal funds
15 U.S. Code Subchapter V - DEBT COLLECTION PRACTICES § 1692d - Harassment or

abuse § 1692e -False or misleading representations § 1692f - Unfair practices § 1692g -
Validation of debt § 1692j - Furnishing certain deceptive forms Fair Debt. Collection Act
(FDCPA) § 806 Harassment, § 807 False and misleading, § 808 Unfair practices, § 809
Validation of debts, § 812 Furnishing deceptive forms, et al
31 U.S.C. § 3729 Federal False Claims Act Violation of the Consent Order in 2014 with the DOJ
and 48 states including Virginia.
CFPB has filed new suit USDC Southern District of Florida West Palm Beach Div Case No. 9:17
– cv-80495
Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi has also a new suit filed against OCWEN and Judge
Donald Alexander has stated she is his counsel in this matter through his Judges Chambers
Theft by deceptive taking

Illegal Conversion of Real Estate
Exhibit 1- 3 EPSON110.PDF
Final for E Virginia State Bar Complaint to be ...

Warmly,
--
JW Grenadier
popular opposition, shame, scandal, discouragement, or personal loss

Grenadier.076104.Response To FOIA Request, 12-11-19

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Grenadier.076104.Response To FOIA Request, 12-11-19

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

August 12,2009

Janice Wolk Grenadier

Re: In the Matter of Ilona Ely (Freedman) Grenadier

Dear Ms. Grenadier:

Subsequently,on November 25,2008 Jane A. Fletcher,VSB Deputy Intake Counsel,wrote you

Accordingly,please note that no further reviews will be conducted.

Very truly yours,

_ Mr. _ Mrs. _ Miss _

15 W Spring St. Daytime Telephone No.:

LAWYER’S Ilona Ely Freedman Grenadier Heckman

LAWYER’S Grenadier, Anderson, Starace & Duffe Lawyer’s Telephone No.:

FORM MUST BE SIGNED AND DATED

PLEASE ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS:

3. Did you hire this lawyer? ❑ yes ❑

LAWYER’S ACTIONS COMPLAINED OF:

my complaints.. i have decided to go to the public and see how many

other peoples lives you have screwed with.

_ Mr. _ Mrs. _ Miss _

15 West Spring Street Daytime Telephone No.:

LAWYER’S Ilona Ely Freedman Grenadier Heckman

LAWYER’S Grenadier Anderson, Starace & Duffet Lawyer’s Telephone No.:

Amy Bird, (540) 635-5390

Andrea Grenadier, (703) 624-4557

Scotty , (571) 438-5627

FORM MUST BE SIGNED AND DATED

PLEASE ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS:

In 2008/2009/2010 - would like to believe Edward Davis - VSB wants to

do the Right thing - investigate the Truth.

Ilona Grenadier is with holding from me.

3. Did you hire this lawyer? ❑ yes ❑

Ilona -late wife Albert stepmther David - mismanage Sonia Grenadier

Trust (mther to Albert)

LAWYER’S ACTIONS COMPLAINED OF:

Ilona Grenadier representing herself was disingenuous in court in

September of 2007, She filed false and disingenuous statements knowingly

Ilona insisted on for a loan of a commission which she negotiated a

firm. I have requested the Note on several occasions to be returned and

mismanaged these funds manipulated me into believing differently. Ilona

with everyone involved with the mismanagement of the Sonia Grenadier

wanted. In the summer of 2008 Ilona Grenadier turned to Janice Wolk

an accounting I had done that at least $54,000 - $ 60,000. had been

LAWYER’S ACTIONS COMPLAINED OF (continued)

rules of the VSB:

Virginia Code Responsibilities:

LAWYER’S ACTIONS COMPLAINED OF (continued)

DR 9 - 101 / 102 / 103

Everything can be backed up in writing with documents from arms length

details in day timers that I keep.

_ Mr. _ Mrs. _ Miss _

15 West Spring Street Daytime Telephone No.:

LAWYER’S Charles A Anderson

LAWYER’S Grenadier Anderson, Starace & Duffet Lawyer’s Telephone No.:

Ilona Grenadier Heckman, (703) 683-9000

Arlene Starace, (703) 683-9000

Benton S Duffett , (703) 683-9000

Elaine M Vadas, (703) 683-9000

FORM MUST BE SIGNED AND DATED

PLEASE ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS:

3. Did you hire this lawyer? ❑ yes ❑

Partner @ Grenadier Anderson Starace & Duffett PC

LAWYER’S ACTIONS COMPLAINED OF:

Charles A. Anderson is aware of Ilona Grenadier's infractions - being

disingenuous in court - filing false documents - with holding my Note by